Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141216IPC to Staff 5.pdf3Effi*. An IDACORP Companv Pt{ tr: 56 DONOVAN E. WALKER Lead Counsel dwalker@idahopower.com December 16,2014 VIA HAND DELIVERY Jean D. Jewell, Secretary ldaho Public Utilities Commission 47 2 W est Wash i ngto n Street Boise, ldaho 83702 Re: Case No. IPC-E-14-27 Pocatello Solar 1, LLC - ldaho Power Company's Response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff Dear Ms. Jewell: Enclosed for filing in the above matter are an original and three (3) copies of ldaho Power Company's Response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff. An external hard drive containing the requested provided on the external hard drive are confidential accordance with the Protective Agreement in this matter. DEW:csb Enclosures files and is provided. The files should be handled in .r/L '1221 W. ldaho 5t PO. Box 70 Boise, lD 83707 onovan E. Walker DONOVAN E. WALKER (lSB No. 5921) ldaho Power Company 1221West ldaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5317 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 dwalker@idahopower. com Attomey for ldaho Power Company IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF AN ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT WITH POCATELLO SOLAR 1, LLC FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC ENERGY. 2illtr0[C l6 PFI h:57 rt1 F, I Il!ri\r i"-' , !- .i, tlT I L lTl l; $ C0i'l i'{ i [i$ i t.]i'l BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. |PC-E-14-27 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY COMES NOW, ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Powef'), and in response to the Third Production Request of the Commission Staff to ldaho Power Company dated December 10, 2014, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 1 REQUEST NO. 5: Please re-calculate the rates for the project by using in AURORA the exact generation quantities and hourly and monthly shapes as are represented in Appendix I of the Agreement. Please compare the resulting rates to those contained in Replacement Appendix E included as Attachment 1 to ldaho Powe/s lnitial Comments. Please compare the 2O-year levelized rates under both scenarios and calculate the difference in the total 20-year contractual obligation. With your answer, please provide copies of all AUROM and Excel files used for the analysis. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5: ldaho Power already uses the exact generation quantities and hourly and monthly shapes as contained within Appendix I in the incremental cost Integrated Resource Plan ("lRP") model in the incremental pricing tool. One input into the AURORA model that is required to establlsh the hourly generation resource stack of existing resources (not including the proposed qualifying facility ('QF') project) is the estimated hourly generation from all available resources that exist prior to the addition of the proposed QF project. ln many cases, ldaho Power does not have specific hourly energy estimates from the various QF projects; instead, ldaho Power only has monthly energy estimates. Therefore, to create an hourly energy shape of these QF resources, ldaho Power shapes the monthly energy estimates by using generic information related to the resource types. ln the case of solar projects, this hourly shaping has been based upon industry and loca! information with regards to solar radiation and the expected energy deliveries from generic solar projects. Because some solar projects are now providing hourly energy estimates, a potential enhancement to the incremental cost IRP model will be to include the project specific hourly energy estimates (when available) in the cumulative solar hourly energy shapes IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2 that are used in establishing the hourly generation resource stack. ldaho Power has included the applicable information for the revised incremental cost IRP model runs with this response. A comparison of the 20-year levelized rates under both scenarios is listed below. 20-year Levelized Rates1st 3rdProduction ProductionPocatello Solar 1 Request $61.52 Request $61.33 Difference ($o.t s1 Below is the difference in the total 2O-year contractual obligation. 20-year Gontractual O bl i gation-l ncl ud i ng I nteg ration Pocatello Solar 1 lst 3rdProduction Production Difference Request Request $75,034,621 $74,734,154 ($300,467) Please see the directory titled "IPC-E-14-26 thru 29 IPUC Staffs Third Production Request" and the confidential subdirectory titled "CONFIDENTIAL-IPC-E-14- 27-Pocatello Solar 1-IPUC 3rd PROD Request-Response 5" on the external hard drive for the Excel files used for the analysis. ln addition, please see the directory titled "lPC- E-14-26 thru 29 IPUC Staff's Third Production Request" and the confidential subdirectory titled 'CONFIDENTIAL-IPC-E-14-26 thru 29-AURORA Change Set-!PUC 3rd PROD Request-Response 5" for the AURORA files. Because of the very large size of the requested files, they are being provided to Staff on the accompanying external hard drive. The files and data contain non-public, confidential, and proprietary dispatch costs or project generation of ldaho Power resources and should be handled in accordance with the Protective Agreement. The external hard drive and file IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3 subdirectories are marked .CONFIDENTIAL.' However, to maintain the integrity of the files, the files themselves are not further marked or identified as confidential. The response to this Request is sponsored by Randy C. Allphin, Energy Contracts Coordinator Leader, ldaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, ldaho, this 16th day of December 2014. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4 Attorney for ldaho Power Company CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ! HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 16th day of December 2014 I served a true and correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Kristine A. Sasser Deputy Attomey General ldaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington (83702) P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4 Pocatello Solar 1, LLC Dean J. Miller McDEVITT & MILLER, LLP 420 West Bannock Boise, ldaho 83702 Mark van Gulik Pocatello Solar 1, LLC P.O. Box 7354 Boise, ldaho 83707 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAXX Emai! kris.sasser@puc.idaho.qov Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAXX Email ioe@mcdevitt-miller. com Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Ovemight Mail FAXX Email mvanqulik@sunerqyworld.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REOUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 5