HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130325IPC to Staff 1-4.pdfaqMN
991310MR6
IDAHO
An IDACORP Company
Zfl•11MAR25 pM
LISA D. NORDSTROM -
Lead Counsel 1 1 Inordstrom(idahopower.com ILl I CMMISSIO.
March 25, 2013
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
Re: Case No. IPC-E-13-04
EnerNOC 2' Amendment - Idaho Power Company's Responses to the
Commission Staffs ("Staff') First Production Request
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed for filing in the above matter are an original and three (3) copies of Idaho
Power Company's responses to Staffs First Production Request.
Very truly yours,
Lisa D. Nordstrom
LDN :evp
Enclosures
1221 W. Idaho St. (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, ID 83707
LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733)
JULIA A. HILTON (ISB No. 7740)
Idaho Power Company
1221 West Idaho Street (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
Telephone: (208) 388-5825
Facsimile: (208) 388-6936
Inordstrom(idahoDower.com
ihiItonidahopower.com
ThI3 MAR 2S PM !:t +8
.) ) UIT IL IT
Attorneys for Idaho Power Company
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR
APPROVAL OF ITS AGREEMENT WITH
ENERNOC TO IMPLEMENT AND
OPERATE A VOLUNTARY
COMMERCIAL DEMAND RESPONSE
PROGRAM.
CASE NO. IPC-E-13-04
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S
RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSION STAFF'S FIRST
PRODUCTION REQUEST
COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "Company"), and in
response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power
Company dated March 14, 2013, herewith submits the following information:
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSIONSTAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST -1
REQUEST NO. 1: Under what conditions will the Company pay EnerNoc an
energy payment?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1: The Company pays EnerNOC for all
megawatt-hour reduction which occurs as a result of demand response events after the
first two events in a calendar week.
The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer
Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D.
Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSIONSTAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST -2
REQUEST NO. 2: What scenario(s) will the Company dispatch FlexPeak in 2013
under the proposed amendment?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2: The process of deciding if the Company will
dispatch the FlexPeak Management program would be the same under the proposed
amendment and under the current amendment. The only difference is that under the
proposed amendment the program would be available for 30 total hours during the
season while under the current contract the program is available for 60 total hours of
dispatch during the season.
Each week during the program season, representatives from the Energy
Efficiency, Power Supply, Compliance, System Dispatch, Regulatory Affairs,
Transmission Planning, and Generation Dispatch departments meet to discuss the
dispatch potential for the following week. At this meeting, the Company considers a
combination of factors, including: load forecast, temperature forecast, generation
availability, on-peak energy prices, transmission availability, and FlexPeak program
parameters and availability to determine whether the program will be dispatched. The
dispatch of the program can be decided up to two hours prior to the event, depending
on load and resource conditions.
The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer
Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D.
Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSIONSTAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST -3
REQUEST NO. 3: What scenario(s) will the Company dispatch FlexPeak in
2013 under the current contract?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3: Each week during the program season,
representatives from the Energy Efficiency, Power Supply, Compliance, System
Dispatch, Regulatory Affairs, Transmission Planning, and Generation Dispatch
departments meet to discuss the dispatch potential for the following week. At this
meeting, the Company considers a combination of factors, including: load forecast,
temperature forecast, generation availability, on-peak energy prices, transmission
availability, and FlexPeak program parameters and availability to determine whether the
program will be dispatched. The dispatch of the program can be decided up to two
hours prior to the event, depending on load and resource conditions.
The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer
Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D.
Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSIONSTAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST -4
REQUEST NO. 4: Given the Company's answers to Request Nos. 2 and 3, what
is the Company's anticipated cost for the Flex Peak Program for 2013? Please
delineate by customer incentive, labor/administrative, other expense, and purchased
services.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4: Idaho Power does not have the anticipated
cost for the FlexPeak program delineated in the cost categories that Staff has
requested. However, the Company estimates labor/administrative expenses to be
approximately $120,000 and program evaluation costs to be approximately $60,000
under both scenarios in Staffs Production Request Nos. 2 and 3. The Company
estimates that under the proposed amendment the contractor costs will be between
approximately $2.5 and $2.8 million for 2013 and under the current contract Idaho
Power estimates the contractor costs will be between approximately $3.0 and $3.3
million for 2013.
The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer
Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D.
Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company.
DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 25th day of March 2013.
6 ~ ~. - " S, : 1j, V", -~~
LISA D. NORDS1LROM
Attorney for Idaho Power Company
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSIONSTAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST -5
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 25 th day of March 2013 I served a true and
correct copy of the within and foregoing IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES
TO THE COMMISSION STAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST upon the following
named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following:
Commission Staff
Weldon Stutzman
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington (83702)
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Industrial Customers of Idaho Power
Peter J. Richardson
RICHARDSON & O'LEARY, PLLC
515 North 27th Street (83702)
P.O. Box 7218
Boise, Idaho 83707
Dr. Don Reading
6070 Hill Road
Boise, Idaho 83703
X Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
X Email Weldon .StutzmanDuc. idaho.ciov
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
X Email Pete rrichardsonandoIeary.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
X Email dreadinqmindsDrinci.com
AV P-
Elizabeth PaynterXgaI Assistant
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSES TO THE
COMMISSIONSTAFF'S FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST -6