The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20111219Exhibits Volumes III-VI.pdfORIGINAL.BEFORE THE IDAHO ~itef:c'Vt¡:TILITIES COMMISSION zou DEC' 9 AM 11 :48 IN THE MATTER OF OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES. AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE IN IDAHO E X H I. BI T S BEFORE.COMMISSIONERMARSHA H. SMITH (Presiding) COMMISSIONER MACKA. REDFORD COMMI SS lONER PAULKJELLANDER PLACE:Commission Hearing Room 472 West Washington Boise, Idaho DATES:December 5& 6, 2011 VOLUMES III - VI - Pages 10 - 873 . CSB REPORTING Constance S.Bucy, CSRNo. 187 23876 Applewood Way*Wìlder,Idaho83676 (208)890-5198 * (208) 337-4807 Emaìl csbCÐeritagewìficom . l!V)Lo:: CJLoa:zo 6::coa:0. V)).zc:0.~ou a: Lo ~o0.o:ic:c-ot- LoV)Zo0.V)Loa: V) . . -c:0. :3 ~ c:t-ZLo~:iu ~ co.. IV E...ec ..- .. 1; 0.- N.. -.Cl øc c .. :JIV .. 3= ~c: a. 5 ~uu a. 5w * IV ~ ¡¡ a. 5uen 5 wen Exhibit No. 49 Case No. IPC-E-11-08 T. Drake, IPC Page 1 of 1 IDAHO RIDER FORECAST, with a Funding Rate of 4. 75% a b c d 2011*2012 2013 2014 1 Beginning Balance $(17,592,938)$(6,228,936)$5,194,373 $20,204,986 2 Move balance To PCA $10,000,000 3 Rider Funding $37,536,678 $40,089,458 $40,770,978 $41,464,085 4 Carrying Charges $(89,823) $(62,289)$51,944 $202,050 5 Total Funding $37,446,855 $40,027,168 $40,822,922 $41,666,135 6 Incentives-Demand Response $(12,738,599)7 Incentives-Other $(11,341,579)$(15,155,179)$(12,591,590)$(13,048,793) 8 Expenses $(12,002,675) $(13,448,681 )$(13,220,719)$(13,501,416) 9 Totallncentives/Expenses $(36,082,853) $(28,603,860)$(25,812,309)$(26,550,209) 10 Fund Balance $'6,228,936) $5,194,373 $20,204,986 $35,320,911 "2011 includes Actuals from Jan-Oct Incentives from Other Funding Sources 11 Custom Effciency Incentives (5,641,549) $(4,794,356)$(4,837,392) $(4,310,617) 12 Incentives-Demand Response $(15,286,000)$(15,286,000) $(15,286,000) Total forecasted DSM Expenses, Idaho 13 Rider and Other Funding $(41,724,402) $(48,684,216)$(45,935,701) $(46,146,826) IDAHO RIDER FORECAST, with a Funding Rate of 4.00% 2011*2012 2013 2014 14 Beginning Balance $(17,592,938)$(6,228,936)$(1,135,542) $7,374,249 15 Move balance To PCA $10,000,000 16 Rider Funding*$37,536,678 $33,759,543 $34,333,455 $34,917,124 17 Carrying Charges**$(89,823) $(62,289)$(11,355) $73,742 18 Total Funding $37,446,855 $33,697,254 $34,322,100 $34,990,867 19 Incentives-Demand Response $(12,738,599) 20 Incentives-Other $(11,341,579)$(15,155,179)$(12,591,590)$(13,048,793) 21 Expenses $(12,002,675)$(13,448,681)$(13,220,719)$(13,501,416) 22 Totallncentives/Expenses $(36,082,853)$(28,603,860)$(25,812,309)$(26,550,209) 23 Fund Balance $(6,228,936) $(1,135,542) $7,374,249 $15,814,907 *2011 includes Acla/s from Jan-Oct Incentives from Other Funding Sources 24 Custom Effciency Incentives (5,641,549) $(4,794,356)$(4,837,392) $(4,310,617) 25 Incentives-Demand Response $(15,286,000)$(15,286,000) $(15,286,000) Total forecasted DSM Expenses, Idaho 26 Rider and Other Funding $(41,724,402)$(48,684,216) $(45,935,701) $(46,146,826) ASSUMPTIONS SOURCE Funding Based on 2011 IRP Sales and Load Forecast, dated Sept 1, 2010. Canying Charges 1 % of average annual baance Incentives Based on 2011 IRP w/expansion programs beginning in 2012 Indudes addition of OER incentives for 2011 ($700k) & 2012 ($2.8m) . .;,Exhibit No. 50 Case No. IPC-E-11-08 T. Drake, IPC Page 1 of 1 .Customer Relationship Index Burke Survey Participated in Programs vs. Not - Total . Percent in Group Average Points Min = 0, Max = 4 3.62 3.56 3.19 3.44 3.24 3.53 3.48 2.91 3.26 3.01 . Exhibit No. 51 Case No. IPC-E-11-08 T. Drake, IPC Page 1 of 1 . . . Idaho Power Company I.P.U.C. No. 29, Tariff No. 101 Original Sheet No. M-1 RULEM FACILITIES CHARGE SERVICE This rule applies to eligible customers taking Primary or Transmission Service under Schedules 9 and 19 or Transmission Service under Schedule 24. Eligible Customers may request that the Company design, install, own, and operate transformers and other facilties beyond the Point of Delivery that are solely provided to meet the Customer's service requirements. This service is provided at the Customer's request and at the option of the Company in exchange for the Customer paying a monthly facilties charge to the Company. Primary and Transmission Service level Customers not taking facilties charge services are responsible for providing the transformation of power beyond the Point of Delivery needed to meet the Customer's service requirements. See Rule B. 1. Company-Owned Facilties Beyond the Point of Delivery Under a facilties charge arrangement, the Company will own and operate facilties beyond the Point of Delivery that are installed to solely benefit the Customer, and the Customer will pay a monthly facilities charge to the Company based on a percentage of the value of the facilities installed. As part of this arrangement, the Customer agrees to allow Idaho Power access to the Customer's propert to provide installation of facilties, operation and maintenance, alteration, relocation, upgrade, conversion, and/or removal in order to meet the Customer's service requirements. The Customer agrees to provide rights-of-way as outlined in Rule C. Company-owned facilties beyond the Point of Delivery wil be set forth in a Distribution Facilties Investment Report (DFI) provided to the Customer. As the Company's investment in facilities beyond the Point of Delivery changes in order to meet the Customer's service requirements, the Company shall notify the Customer of the additions and/or deletions of facilties by forwarding to the Customer a revised DF!. The Company wil also adjust the monthly facilties charge to be paid by the Customer based on any increase or decrease in the value of the Company-owned facilties resulting from additions and/or deletions as set forth in the revised DF!. 2.Alteration and Failure of Company-Owned Facilties In the event the Customer requests the Company to alter (remove, reinstall, or change) Company-owned facilties beyond the Point of Delivery, the Customer shall pay to the Company the "non-salvable cost" of such removal, reinstallation, or change. Non-salvable cost as used herein is comprised of the total depreciated costs of materials, labor, and overheads of the facilties, less the difference between the salvable cost of material removed, and removal labor cost including appropriate overhead costs. Failed equipment will be replaced by the Company as part of providing ongoing operation and maintenance of Company-owned facilties installed beyond the Point of Delivery. When a failed piece of equipment is replaced by the Company, the value of the failed piece of equipment wil be removed from the Customer's DFI and replaced with the value of the new piece of equipment to calculate the Customer's monthly facilities charge. Exhibit No. 52 Case No. IPC-E-11-08 M. Youngblood, IPC Page 1 of 3 IDAHO Issued per Order No. Effective - January 1, 2012 Issued by IDAHO POWER COMPANY Gregory W. Said, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho Idaho Power Company I.P.U.C. No. 29. Tariff No. 101 Original Sheet No. M-2 . RULEM FACILITIES CHARGE SERVICE 3. Sale of Company-Owned Facilties Customers paying a facilties charge may request to purchase Company-owned facilties installed beyond the Point of Delivery. All sales of facilties must be approved by the Commission and meet the following provisions: a. Idaho Code Section 61-328. b. No mixed ownership of facilties. A Customer purchasing Company-owned facilties installed beyond the Point of Delivery must purchase all facilties listed on the DFI for that location. c. The Customer must provide the operation and maintenance of all facilties installed beyond the Point of Delivery after the sale is complete. d. The Customer must prepay engineering costs for sales determinations taking greater than 16 estimated hours of preparation. Sales determinations equal to or less than 16 estimated hours of preparation wil be biled to the Customer as part of the sales agreement, or after the engineering is completed in instances where the sale is not finalized. 4.Monthly Facilties Charge Rate . Effective January 1, 2012, a facilties charge, as specified in Schedule 66, wil be assessed on each facilties charge customer's monthly biling. 5. Consent and Acknowledge Form Prior to entering into a facilties charge arrangement, the Customer and Company must agree to and sign the Facilties Charge Service Consent and Acknowledgement Form attached to this rule. Exhibit No. 52 Case No. IPC-E-11-08 M. Youngblood, IPC . Page 2 of3 IDAHO Issued per Order No. Effective - January 1, 2012 Issued by IDAHO POWER COMPANY Gregory W. Said, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho . . . Idaho Power Company I.P.U.C. No. 29. Tariff No. 101 Original Sheet No. M-3 RULEM FACILITIES CHARGE SERVICE Idaho Power Company Facilties Charge Service Consent and Acknowledgement Form By signing this form, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power") and ("Customer") hereby consent to and acknowledge the following: 1. Idaho Power wil design, install, own, and operate transformers and other facilties on the Customets propert which are beyond Idaho Powets Point of Delivery and are solely provided to meet the Customer's service requirements at the following Customer location: 2. This service is provided at the Customets request and at the option of Idaho Power in exchange for the Customer paying a monthly facilties charge to Idaho Power as listed in Schedule 66 of Idaho Power's current and effective tariff. 3. Idaho Power and the Customer agree that this arrangement is provided under the terms and conditions of Rule M, Facilities Charge Service, of Idaho Power's current and effective tarif. Dated: IDAHO POWER COMPANY CUSTOMER Exhibit No. 52 Case No. IPC-E-11-08 M. Youngblood, IPC Page 30f3 IDAHO Issued per Order No. Effective - January 1, 2012 Issued by IDAHO POWER COMPANY Gregory W. Said, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs 1221 West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho . . . LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) JASON B. WILLIAMS Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 Inordstrom£midahopower.com dwalker£midahooower.com jwilliams£midahooower.com Attorneys for Idaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MA TIER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR, ) CASE NO. IPC-E-11-Q8 AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES ) AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC ) STIPULATIONSERVICE IN IDAHO. ) ) This stipulation ("Stipulation") is entered into by and among Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "Company"), the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilties Commission ("Staff), and other parties to the above referenced case as indicated by their signatures to this settlement Stipulation. The Company, Staff, and other signing parties are referr to individually as a "Signing Part or collectively referrd to as the "Signing Parties."1 I. INTRODUCTION 1. The terms and conditions of this Stipulation are set forth herein. The Signing Parties agree that this Stipulation reresents a fair, just, and reasonable comprmise ofthe 1 Although all partes to this case (including the Sta, the Company, and all intervenor identied in paragraph 11.3) participated in settement discussions, CAPAI is not a Signing Part. STIPULATION - 1 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 1 of 53 EXIBIT . . . issues in this proceeding and that this Stipulation is in the public interest. The Signing Parties maintain that the Stipulation and its acceptance by the Idaho Public Utilties Commission (ill PUC" or "Commission") represent a reasonable resolution of most issues identified in this matter. The issues that remain unresolved, as specified below, will be addressed either in this rate case proceeding or in separate proceedings, but wil not disturb the agreements reached in this Stipulation. Therefore, the Signing Parties recommend that the Commission, in accrdance with RP 274, approve the Stipulation and all of its terms and conditions wihout material change or condition. II. BACKGROUND 2. On June 1, 2011, Idaho Power filed an Application in this case seeking authority to increase the Company's base rates an average of 9.9 percent. If approved, the Company's revenues would have increased approximately $83 milion annually. Idaho Power proposed that the rate increase be spread in varyng degrees among all major customer classes and special contract customers. The Company requested that new raes become effective July 1, 2011, with the expectation that the Commission would suspend implementation of the Company's proposed rates for the statutory period set forth in Idaho Code § 61.622. The Commission suspended the effective date of the proposed rates for thirt (30) days plus five (5) months from July 1, 2011, in Order No. 32272, which also aligned with the terms of the stipulation approved in Case No. IPC-E.09-30 requiring that any changes to the Company's base rates would not become effective until 2012. 3. Petitions to intervene in this proceeding were filed by the Communit Action Partnership Association of Idaho ("CAPAI"), Idaho Irration Pumpers Association, Inc. ("IlPA"), the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power ("ICIP"), Micron Technology, Inc. STIPULATION - 2 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E- 1 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 2 ofS3 . . . ("Micron"), the United States Department of Energy ("DOE"), The Kroer Co. ("Kroget'), the Idaho Conservation League, Snake River Allance, the NW Energy Coaliton, and Hoku Materials, Inc. ("Hoku"). By various orders, the Commission granted these interventions. IPUC Order Nos. 32266, 32267, 32282, 32285, 32288, 32289, 32316, and 32349. 4. On July 20, 2011, an informal scheduling conference was convened by Staff for the purpse of developing a schedule for holding hearings and completing discovery. All parties attended the settlement conferences on August 31, 2011, and September 8, 2011. 5. Based upon these settlement discussions, as a compromise of the positions In this case, and for other consideration as set forth below, the Signing Parties agree to the following terms: II. TERMS OF THE STIPULATION 6.Revenue Requirement. The Signing Parties agree that Idaho Power shall be allowed to implement revised tari schedules designed to recover $34 milion in additional annual revenue from Idaho jurisdictional base rates, which is a 4.07 percnt overall increase in the Company's annual Idaho jurisdictional base rate revenues. The Signing Parties further agree that the $34 milion increase represents a compromise of the revenue requirement positions in the case for the purpse of settlement and that the agre upon amount should be approved by the Commission in Its entirety wihout furter adjustment for any factors other than those described in Section 11 of this Stipulation. In determining the $34 milion additional revenue requirement, the Signing Parties agree on certain revenue requirement inputs to be explicitly identified in this Stipulation. These are as follows: STIPULATION - 3 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E- i 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff i 010711 i Page 3 of 53 . . . (a) Net Power Supply Expense ("NPSE"). For purpses of calculating the Power Cost Adjustment ("PCA") mechanism, the system net power supply cost used to determine the $34 milion of additional revenue requirement increase is $208,100,936. This base level of NPSE includes $11,252,265 of base level demand response incntive payments that the Signing Parties agree should be tracked as part of the PCA as propose by the Company in its original Application and includes $23.921,466 of retail sales revenue associated with Hoku's First Block energy sales that is crated as an offset to power supply expenses in the PCA. Exhibit No.1 attached hereto details the indivdual PCA component amounts by Federal Energ Regulatory Commission account that have been agre upon by the Signing Parties. (b) Amortizations. The Signing Parties agree to a deferrl of certin 2011 expenses with multi-year amortizations of those deferr amounts. The Signing Parties agree to a deferral of $299,546 in expenses associated with the Bennett Mountain combustor inspecion with a four-year amortiztin period beginning on the date that the Company's new base rates become effective. Further, the Signing Parties agree to a deferrl of $436,047 in expenses associated with the Light Detection and Ranging ("LiDAR") survey with a ten-year amortization period beinning on the date that the Company's new base rates become effective. (c) Rate of Return. The Signing Parties agree that it would be just and reasonable for the Commission to allow the Company to earn a 7.86 percent rate of return on an authorized Idaho jurisdictional rate base of $2,355,906,412. In addition, the Signing Parties agree that it would be just and reasonable for the Commission to allow the Company to earn an authorized rate of return of 7.86 percent in any Idaho Power STIPULATION - 4 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 4 of 53 . . . regulatory matter to be determined by the Commission until it is subsequently changed by Commission order. 7. Rate Spread. The Signing Partes agre that the above-escribe $34 millon revenue requirement incrase should be recovere by implementing taris in conformance with the attached Exhibit No.2, which increase the rates for each customer class and special contracts customers by a uniform percentage amount of approximately 4.19 percnt.2 The Signing Parties further agree that the Company's proposed cost-of-service study wil be used to determine fixed costs for purpses of the Fixed Cost Adjustment ("FCA") mechanism until the Commission approves a different cost-of-service study. The Signing Parties agree that the accptance of the use of the Company's cost-of-service study in the context of the FCA for the purpses of settlement is not acceptance of any methodology underlying the Company's cost-of-servce study results, is not binding on the Signing Parties in future general rate case proceedings, and does not imply agreement on the meris of the methodology. 8. Rate Design. In determining the indivdual rates for each tari schedule, the Signing Parties agree to use the 2011 Test Year customer billng determinants as proposed by the Company in this case wih the exception of agreed upon adjustment in Schedule 1 residential energy components. The Signing Parties agree that the existing tariff rate components for all schedules should be increased in a manner that is consistent with the rate design originally filed by the Company in this case, including incrasing the 2 The resulting uniform percntae increase amount of approimat 4.19 pent is grte thn th overall increase of 4.07 pent beuse the overall increase doe not apply to First Block rates for speial contract customer Hoku Materials, inc. STIPULATION - 5 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07111 Page 5 of 53 . . . monthly Service Charge for residential Schedules 1, 4, and 5 from $4.00 to $5.00. The attached Exhibit No. 3 details the specific rates for each schedule. 9. Load Change Adjustment Rate. In determining the agreed-upon Load Change Adjustment Rate ("LCAR") to be applied in the Company's PCA, the Signing Parties agree to use Idaho Powets filed class cost-of-servce methodology to determine the generation-related Idaho jurisdictional revenue reuirement that has been classi as energy-related. The resulting LCAR of $18.16 per megawat-hour was developed using 2011 normalized system-wide firm loads in the amount of 14,822,063 megawatt-hours as proposed by the Company in this case. Exhibit No. 4 to the Stipulation details the derivation of the agreed upon LCAR that is to become effecive on the date that the Company's new base rates beme effective. 10. Separate Proceedings. To facilitate further investigation and participation, the Signing Parties agree that Idaho Power will initiate separate, subsequent proceedings related to: (a) Increasing overhead amounts paid by persons or entities requesting servces under the Company's Rule H line extension tariff; and (b) Whether the FCA pilot program should be made permanent. The Signing Parties agree, however, that the FCA case should be processed to allow a final Order to be issued no later than March 30, 2012. To allow for the timely processing of the FCA case, the Signing Parties request that the Commission decide at its earliest convenience (after a 14-day response perid per RP 256) whether to process the FCA case as a separate docket. The Signing Parties further agree that if the Commission approves or extends the FCA program beyond 2011, no Signing Part will object to STIPULATION - 6 Exhibit No. 1 0 1 Case No. IPC-E-l 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 6 of 53 . retroactively applying the subsequently determined fixed costs per customer ("FCC") and fixed costs per energy ("FCE") inputs to January 1, 2012. 11. Unresolved Issues. The Signing Parties were not able to rech consensus on the following issues, which will proceed to hearing under the schedule established in Order No. 32316: (a) The level of the Energy Effciency Rider; (b) Low-income Weatherization Assistance for Qualified Customer program funding; and (c) The facilit charge rate determination methodology used to develop facilties charges assessed to Schedule 19 customers and issues relating to the ownership .of facilities subject to facilities charges. However, the Signing Parties agree that any revenue requirement impacts resulting from changes to the facilty charge methodology or changes in propert ownership shall be directly assigned to Schedule 19 customers in the form of a base rate increase or reduction so that no other customer classes shall be impacted by any resulting change. 12. Rate Effective Date. The Signing Parts encourage the Commission to issue its Order approving the agreed-upon rates contained in this Stipulation to beme effecve on January 1, 2012. 13. The Signing Parties agree that this Stipulation represents a compromise of the positions of the Signing Parties in this case. As provided in RP 272, other than any testimony filed in support of the approval of this Stipulation, and except to the extent necessary for a Signing Part to explain before the Commission its own statements and positions with respect to the Stipulation, all statements made and positions taken in. STIPULATION - 7 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 7 of 53 .negotiations relating to this Stipulation shall be confidential and will not be admissible in evidence in this or any other proeding. 14. The Signing Parties submit this Stipulation to the Commission and recommend approval in its entirety pursuant to RP 274. The Signing Parties shall support this Stipulation before the Commission, and shall not appeal a Commission Order approving the Stipulation or an issue resolved by the Stipulation. If this Stipulation is challenged by anyone who is not a Signing Part, the Signing Parties reserve the right to file testimony, cross-examine witnesses, and put on such case as they deem appropriate to respond fully to the issues presented, including the right to raise issues that are incorporated in the settlements embodied in this Stipulation. Notwhstanding this .reservation of rights, the Signing Parties agree that they will continue to support the Commission's adoption of the terms of this Stipulation. 15. If the Commission rejects any part or all of this Stipulation, or imposes any additional material conditions on approval of this Stipulation, each Signing Part reserves the right, upon written notice to the Commission and the other Signing Parties to this proceeding, within fourteen (14) days of the date of such a~tion by the Commission, to wihdraw from this Stipulation. In such case, no Signing Part shall be bound or prejudice by the terms of this Stipulation, and each Signing Part shall be entitled to seek reconsideration of the Commission's Order, file testimony as it chooses, cross-examine winesses, and do all other things necessary to put on such case as it deems appropriate. In such case, the Signing Parties immediately wil request the prompt reconvening of a prehearing conference for purpses of establishing a proceural schedule for the completion of the case. The Signing Parties agree to cooperate in development of a. STIPULATION - 8 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 8 of 53 . . . , schedule that concludes the proceeding on the ear1iest possible date, taking into accunt the needs of the Signing Parties in participating in hearings and preparing briefs. 16. The Signing Parties agree that this Stipulation is in the public interest and that all of its terms and conditions are fair, just, and reasonable. 17. No Signing Part shall be bound, benefited, or prejudiced by any position asserted in the negotiation of this Stipulation, except to the extent expressly stated herein, nor shall this Stipulation be construed as a waiver of rights unless such rights are expressly waived herein. Except as otherwise expressly provided for herein, execution of this Stipulation shall not be deemed to constitute an acknowledgment by any Signing Part of the validit or invalidity of any particular method, theory, or principle of regulation or cost recvery. No Signing Part shall be deemed to have agreed that any method, theory, or principle of reulation or cost recovery employed in arrving at this Stipulation is appropriate for resolvng any issues in any other proceing in the future. No findings of fact or conclusions of law other than those stated herein shall be deemed to be implicit in this Stipulation. 18. The obligations of the Signing Parties are subject to the Commission's approval of this Stipulation in accrdance with its terms and conditions and upon such approval being upheld on appeal, if any, by a court of competent Jurisdiction. 19. This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and each signed counterpart shall constitute an original document. /I /I /I STIPULATION - 9 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07111 Page 9 of 53 . . . 1iDATED this ~O day of September 2011. Idaho Power Company By~P~A~ Lisa D. NordSt Attomey for Ida 0 Power Company Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Association, Inc. By Eric L. Olsen Attomey for Idaho Irration Pumpers Association, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. By Thorvald Nelson Attomey for Micron Technology, Inc. The Kroger Co. By Kurt J. Boehm Attomey for The Kroger Co. Hoku Materials, Inc. By Dean J.Miler Attomey for Hoku Materials, Inc. Snake River Alliance By Ken Miler Clean Energy Program Director for Snake River Allance STIPULATION -10 Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff By Donald H. Howell, II Attomey for Commission Staff Industrial Customers of Idaho Power By Peter J. Richardson Attomey for Industrial Customers of Idaho Power U.S. Department of Energy By Arthur Perr Bruder Attomey for U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Conservation League By Benjamin J. Oto Attorney for Idaho Conservation League NW Energy Coalition By Nancy Hirsh Policy Director for NW Energy Coalition Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 10 of 53 . . . day of September 2011. Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff BA-¿PiÍ~ Donald H. Howell, II Attorney for Commission Staff Industrial Customers of Idaho Power DATED this Idaho Power Company By Lisa D. Nordstrom Attorney for Idaho Power Company Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Association, Inc. By Eric L. Olsen Attorney for Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Assciation, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. By Thorvald Nelson Attorney for Micron Technology, Inc. The Kroger Co. By Kurt J. Boehm Attorney for The Kroger Co. Hoku Materials, Inc. By Dean J. Miler Attorney for Hoku Materials, Inc. Snake River Allance By Ken Miler Clean Energy Proram Director for Snake River Allance STIPULATION - 10 By Peter J. Richardson Attorney for Industrial Customers of Idaho Power U.S. Department of Energy By Arthur Perr Bruder Attorney for U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Conservation League By Benjamin J. Otto Attorney for Idaho Conservation League NW Energy Coalition By Nancy Hirsh Policy Director for NW Energy Coalition Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-II-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10107111 Page 11 of 53 . DATED this _ day of Septeber 2011. Idaho Power Company By Lisa D. Nordstom Attorney for Idaho Power Company ie. sen Attorney for Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Assation, Inc. Micron Tecnoloy, Inc. ByThorvld Neln Attrney for Micron Technolog, Inc..The Kroger Co. ByKurt J. Bohm Attorny for The Kroer Co. Hoku Matenals, Inc. By Dean J. Miller Attmey for Hoku Matenals, Inc. Snake River Allance By Ken Mille Clean Enegy Program Diretor for snake River Ainance .STPULATIN -10 Idaho Public Utlites Commissio Sta By Donal H. Howell, II Attorney for Commission Sta Industnal Customers of Idaho Powr By Peter J. Richardson Attorney for Indusnal Cusomers of Idaho Power U.S. Departnt of Energ By Artur Perr Bruder Attomey for U.S. Departent of Energ Idaho Conservation Leaue By Benjamin J. Oto Attrney for Idaho Conservatin League NW Energ Coalition By Nancy Hirsh . Policy Direcor for NW Energ Coalion Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07111 Page 12 of 53 .ø: DATED this 2. day of September 2011. Idaho Power Company By Lisa D. Nordstrom Attorney for Idaho Powr Company Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Association, Inc. By Eric L. Olsen Attorney for Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Association, Inc. Micron Tecnology, Inc. By Thorvald Nelson Attorney for Micron Technology, Inc..The Kroer Co. By Kurt J. Boehm Attrney for The Kroger Co. Hoku Materials, Inc. By Dean J. Miller Attorney for Hoku Materials, Inc. Snake River Allance By Ken Miler Clean Energy Program Director for Snake River Allance .STIPULATION - 10 Idaho Public Utilits Commission Staff By Donald H. Howell, II Attorney for Commission Staff Industrial Customers of Idaho PowerByo.~~ardson Attorney for Industrial Customers of Idaho Power ~ U.S. Departent of Energy By Benjamin J. Oto Attorney for Idaho Conservation League NW Energy Coalition By Nancy Hirsh Policy Direcor for NW Energy Coalition Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-II-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 13 of 53 .../ It DATED this .., .)0 -" day of September 2011. Idaho Power Company BY/i\~': ).¡ i Li :.'~ t içi'io,Ît,, Lisa D. Nordstoom Attorney for Idaho Power Company Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. By Eric Li Olsen Attorney for Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Association, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. By t/rz ~;æ nlefVle ~.el8eA ~S""~""'.'''-t Attorney for Micron Technology, Inc..The Kroer Co. By Kurt J. Boehm Attorney for The Kroger Coi Hoku Materials, Inc. By Dean J. Miler Attorney for Hoku Materials, Inc. Snake River Allance By Ken Miler Clean Energy Program Director for Snake River Allance .STIPULATION - 10 Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff By Donald H. Howell, II Attorney for Commission Staff Industrial Customers of Idaho Power By Peter J. Richardson Attorney for Industrial Customers of Idaho Power u.s. Department of Energy By Arthur Perr Bruder Attorney for U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Conservation League By Benjamin J. Otto Attorney for Idaho Conservation League NW Energy Coalition By Nancy Hirsh Policy Director for NW Energy Coalition Exhibit No. 101 Case No. ¡PC-E- 11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 14 of 53 .1 I. I . I i. Ii.,I .' . 1i . .DATEth~ òadSt~011.. 1d.Pcr CO lda PU tJ. Cø st .. .. . .~.~'.. ,ÄI,w Pø~ ld Ir P. ~ Inc. ( By' .i: ~ QI . .~ fo Id :lnJ Il~,~lnc .~~Im.' I i,.1 i t )BY .. .Th Nl ,~ MI T8t1 ~ TI.l( f?. .. .Sy., KurU. Bo , ', .. ,~1hKr,Co.Ho~_. .Ely' .De~."" .~foHa Ma. Ik &A -".lil fil .i' . .BV ~2n~ ,kl=~~ DIfo . . S~-tâ . 81 J'.~ H. HGW. II At foOG"n St I~ Cu at ldah P. . By .P_r J. .RI '. .~.'nd~~..of.~fI, ., u..~OfI:-~ " , ~....-.. \-...u " '8£l, '42 c.. 4 l ., Mh~Sil. ·~'JQ(J;S Oøll8t,(i.i: .. ..1V ,Idah CoL.1J . , I By ~J.9t .A!.fald~. i.:¡;~d . N8 ., Pø DIr"t NW'~1I I~_., " . .. .-. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E- 1 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/1 1 Page 15 of 53 . Micn Tecnolog,lnc. ByThrvald Ne Attmey for Micr Tecol, Inc. The Kr Co.~ii~K.Boehm Attorey fo The Kr Co. Hoku Materials. Inc. .By Den J. MUte Att fo Hoku Materals, Inc. Snake RI Alliance By Ken MIerClen Ener Prom DIrer for Snake RI Anlance STPULATION .12 . U.S. Departt of Ener By Arur Pwr Bner At for U.S. Dertent ofEner Idaho Conservtion League By Benjmin J. Ot Attrn for Idaho Consetion League tl Ener Coaßton By Nency Hirs Pol DIre for tN EnerColltl Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E- 11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 16 of 53 ! I ~;',i"' ,. . DATE"~.d""201. Id Po,,., Co BYl1ii11'¡¡¡¡õMAI.. Iokl Pc.~ Id .... Pu., AllDå..1n Byií L óiMa... lDld Ir roii Pu.A...... II Tec. In BYThlí ¡¡AI.. fa MI Tec, In Th Kl Co. ØyicJ... .- to n. KI Co. Ho niill ri.... In BybíJ... AI fa Ha 1_11 r1.tl, In.....'.... ByR8 a. II..,. DI*, fo8n.. Al.. 81TI. 10 .."lU.I..C..'.'... In Cu.,,,,, U.8...-e. Bym~ ...u." ___It"en Id Can... IIll Lle,~ AI.., lD id CDII.red"'" L.... NW e. ea..m.,...¡¡ , PaOl.- fD --WC..., Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 17 of 53 , ~~I~.~ .,7,.,...": . --:;t';' " -~ '¿',',,'," 'ii i j it".':,i.i,,:"J,! 'Y';;. d .;.~' -:i'7!: .-f DATED this ~() day of Septembe 2011. Idaho Po Company B~.QiHn Lisa D. Nordšt Attrney for Ida Por Company Idaho Irration Pumpe Assatn, Inc. By Eri L. Olsen Attrny for Idaho Irrtin Pumpe Asation, Inc. Micn Technolo, Inc. ByThrvld Neln Attrney for Micn Tecnolo, Inc..Th Kr Co. By Kurt J. Bohm Attrney fo The Krr Co. Hoku Marils, Inc.B~~ Attrny for Ho Materila, Inc. Snake Rir Alliance By Ken Miller Clean Ener Proram Direr for Snake RIr Allianc .STIPULATIN -10 Idah Public Utlit Commission Staff By Dold H. Holl, II Attorney for Commission Staff Indusril Custome of Idaho Por By Peer J. Richrdson Attrny for Industal Custrsof Idaho Por U.S. Departnt of Ene By Arur Per BNder Attrney for U.S. Departnt ofEney Idaho Consrvn Leaue By Benjmin J. OtAtt fo Idaho Consrvn Le NW Ene Colitn By Nanc Hirsh Polic Dire for NW Eney Colitn Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-S R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page ISo£53 I ~.! . I ii I ii', i ! I i ¡.' . . ". --_._._- " 1; " .DATED th ~() " daY,~ Seember :l011. . ldhe' P0Vr COi:an" .ii~ J2\iith. ..sa D. Nø ' . ." . "Altorney"fO Ida. ' oP'COný' Jdaho Intat Pum~er ~", 100.. i By'En L~ Q1 . ..A fu Idah :In:ati Pu~.A1o Inc . ~çrn reç.~io.. Inc" , )By .Thorv Nèlii , . ¡Atrn1Ø MlQln TscAO lnc. Th~rt?. .." ß~ . Kurt.J. Boem . .' " " " Aliifor Th ~er Cø. Hof Mari~, Jllc. By Den J.Mller Alrn to Holm Maenals, InC. 8A RM.Atli~_. . BY lL "'YJZ .Kêñl4 Qln En'Proia QI faSna RI PJao Sï.IP,1' -1"1) Idaho PubliC Utlit" Colnis st By g."~IdH. Howl, IIAttey for'Comrn Stff IndUØ1 CustOrs of ldat Po " By,Petr J.Rlim.AtOJ~r'ndimEl Çwme ."of.ld'Po ~.S. "~rt()( Energ By'. ArturP8.f Sr.~.fprQ;S. J)i:øf"En Idaho CorvnL.eagtJ . . i , By . Bemin J.:( "Alt:fOr"k; ~"rn. Leae :¡;~.Nana¡H1 . . PØl1ëY D1rèor"ro NW'E~'Gllii ( .. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 19 of 53 . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 IDAHO POWER COMPANY . EXHIBIT NO. 1.Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-II-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 20 of 53 .. : : ( J l : e. I l ~ Ol ' V l : r -. 0 C Ð _ . ;: e r z S : .. e r 0 . . u . z "' : 4 - 0 il i l " ' . OQ : : ( J . . CÐ , . , I 0 N m . . i.. o'"VIW ..I00 i¡ i t . .. i s 9. . . . i .. ~ ~ : . ï.I: : : ~ i ~ . . . $$$$$$$.$$.$ Po w e r C o s t A d j u s t m e n t C o m p o n e n t u s i n g J S S A l l o c t i o n F a c t r s To t a l N P S E $ To t a l S y s t e m A l l o c a t i o n 16 7 , 7 1 8 , 0 8 4 1, 8 2 8 , 6 4 0 6, 0 6 2 , 4 7 2 66 , 6 8 9 , 6 0 1 8, 2 6 2 , 0 0 0 92 , 6 4 2 , 1 1 4 23 , 9 2 1 , 4 6 6 13 3 , 9 9 7 , 2 1 7 Id a h o J u r i s d i c t i o n 95 . 0 0 % $ 1 5 9 , 3 2 7 , 2 6 8 95 . 2 2 % $ 1 , 7 4 1 , 2 9 9 95 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 5 9 , 1 8 3 95 . 0 0 % $ 6 3 , 3 5 3 , 1 9 2 95 . 0 0 % $ 7 , 8 4 , 6 6 1 95 . 0 0 $ 8 8 , 0 0 7 , 3 0 8 95 . 3 7 % $ 2 2 , 8 1 4 , 5 8 3 $ 1 2 7 , 2 0 7 , 7 1 2 ac c o u n t 5 0 1 , c o a l ac c o u n t 5 3 6 , w a t e r f o r p o w e r ac c o u n t 5 4 7 , g a s ac c o u n t 5 5 5 , n o n P U R P A ac c o u n t 5 6 5 , t r a n s m i s s i o n ac c o u n t 4 4 7 , s u r p l u s s a l e s ac c o u n t 4 4 2 , H o k u F i r s t B l o c k R e v e n u e s Ne t o f 9 5 % a c c o u n t s ac c o u n t 5 5 5 , P U R P A Ne t o f 1 0 0 % A c c o u n t s ac c o u n t 5 5 5 , D e m a n d R e s p o n s e I n c e n t i v e s $ 62 , 8 5 1 , 4 5 4 62 , 8 5 1 , 4 5 4 95 . 0 0 % $ $ 59 , 7 0 7 , 0 6 3 59 , 7 0 7 , 0 6 3 11 , 2 5 2 , 2 6 5 10 0 . 0 0 % $ 11 , 2 5 2 , 2 6 5 . 0 0 20 8 , 1 0 0 , 9 3 6 $ 19 8 , 1 6 7 , 0 4 0 . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 IDAHO POWER COMPANY . EXHIBIT NO.2. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 22 of 53 .Li n e .t Ja p i Yn o i T a M R a 1 R ø e l S e i c 2 M a t e M e e n M o i l e H o I 1 P a r k 3 R e d e a l S e E n e w a 4 R e d e n S e T i m e - D 5 S m a G e s e i c i. G e e n S e c e 7 D u s I I 0 - . U g n g 8 L a P ~ S e r v c e 9 A g l u l l r r S e 10 U n m ø G e e n S e c e 11 s i n L i g n g 12 T r a e o i r L i g h l i g 13 T o t U n i f T I I -: ; ( J m S: ' ~ ; . ol ' ' ' 0 - -. 0 G _ . :: 0 " Z 9 ' -9 " 0 . . '" e n : - Z ~S " ' " ~ OC : : ( J - G , . , i 0 N m W ~ o - .. I Vl ( ) W 15 s r e ! C o n c i ' 18 M i a o 17 J R S i m p 18 D O E 19 H o - B l o 1 :l H o . B l 2 21 T o t S p C o n 23 T o t l d o R e t a s a "O g ' ° t r i§ 1 = 1 g ; .. Z : = ~. , 9 ä = N" - . f ~ N ( 1 ) 2 0 1 1 T e s Y e a S t i p E n ci . ! ci . . ~g ~ Ra e A v e g e Se . N u m b o f ~ C u ! ! o m ( \ , 1 3 4 5 7 9 15 19 24 40 41 42 26 29 30 32 32 39 7 , 2 22 42 74 26 , 3 5 1 30 , 5 8 o 11 4 16 , 6 0 7 l, l l 31 4 35 47 5 , i i 47 5 , 8 9 7 No En~5,0 0 3 , 5 7 8 . 7 5 2 5, 1 7 5 , 3 1 1 74 3 , 9 3 1, 1 7 8 , 8 0 14 8 , 9 4 , 6 7 0 3, 4 9 2 . 1 4 0 , 6 5 1 6,5 6 2 , 0 9 2, 0 4 0 , 8 8 1 , 7 9 1, 6 7 9 , 7 7 6 , 7 3 4 10 , 0 0 , 9 4 1 23 , 0 1 8 , 6 4 9 3, 4 7 7 , 1 1 3 12 , 4 2 1 , 2 6 1 , 4 5 4 4& , 6 5 , 0 7 0 18 0 , 7 5 8 , 7 9 7 23 5 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 37 0 . 0 0 , 2 1 9 19 7 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 1, 4 4 7 , 8 1 7 , 0 9 13 , 8 8 8 , 8 9 8 , 5 5 1 Id m P o C o f * C. l c u l 8 o f R - . I m p su o f l e i 20 1 1 G R C 8 l p u o n F u n d n g Et r J - . 1 , 2 0 1 2 Su o f " - I m p Cu r r Ba Bm $3 7 9 , 9 3 3 , 7 6 7 $3 7 2 , 8 1 2 $5 . 4 8 $8 7 , 8 f l $1 4 , 3 8 , 8 0 $1 8 9 , 0 8 , 7 4 7 $1 , 1 2 6 , 7 4 4 $1 2 , 8 7 2 , 1 0 8 $1 0 3 , 0 6 , 5 2 9 $1 , 0 6 . 1 1 5 $2 , 7 8 , 7 5 $1 8 0 , 1 9 1 $7 7 4 , 9 7 6 . 1 1 4 $1 6 , 1 8 6 , 3 3 3 $! , 8 9 , 2 9 $7 , 8 8 1 , 3 6 $2 4 , 2 0 , 3 4 $7 , 0 8 , 0 0 7 $8 1 , 0 2 , 3 8 $8 , 0 0 , 0 6 . Mi l i a~75 . 9 3 72 . 0 0 74 . 5 5 74 . 5 5 98 4 2 M. l ! ! 17 2 . G 40 . 0 1 01 . 3 6 88 . 3 8 12 1 . 0 6 40 . 0 7 62 . 3 9 34 . 6 4 32 . 6 0 32 . 5 9 65 . 4 2~42 . 1 8 80 . 2 6 To t a Ad j u s t t s to B aBI $1 5 , 9 1 5 , 2 0 $1 5 , 6 0 ($ 2 4 ) $3 , 8 8 $6 1 , 4 8 57 , 9 1 9 . 4 7 0 $4 7 , 2 7 0 $3 , 4 7 0 , 8 8 $4 , 3 1 8 , 7 2 7 $4 , 4 8 $1 1 8 . 8 8 7 ~ $3 . 4 5 7 , 7 4 8 $6 8 , 0 6 1 $2 6 , 7 1 6 S3 , 8 0 $0 52 , 8 7 4 $1 , 5 4 2 , 2 4 $3 3 , 9 l , 9 9 Pr BaBI 53 5 , 8 4 , 9 7 0 $3 8 , 2 2 1 $5 , 0 3 8 $9 1 , 5 4 $1 4 , 9 6 2 , 2 7 1 $1 9 7 , 0 0 , 2 1 7 $1 , 1 7 6 , 0 1 4 $8 , 3 4 2 , 9 7 2 $1 0 7 , 3 8 , 2 5 6 $1 , 1 0 6 , _ $2 , 9 0 , 4 3 9 $1 8 8 , 9 0 1 $8 7 , 4 3 , 4 4 $1 6 , 8 8 , 3 6 16 . 1 3 9 , 0 1 5 $7 , 9 8 , 1 8 9 $2 4 , 2 0 , 3 4 3 $7 , 3 8 , 8 8 1 $8 , 5 7 0 , 6 1 2 $9 7 0 , 0 0 , 0 5 2 Mil l fi 79 . 1 1 75 . 0 1 73 . 9 8 77 8 7 10 0 . 4 5 !l . 4 2 17 9 . 2 1 42 . 3 1 63 . 9 3 89 . 1 6 12 6 . 1 3 46 . 0 0 65 . 0 0 38 . 2 9 33 . 9 6 33 . 9 5 65 . 4 2~43 . 2 2 62 . 7 3 . Pe r t Ch a Sa & 8 1 l B a Bm 4. 1 1 1 4. 1 9 % (0 . 7 6 ) % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 %~4.1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 4. 1 9 % 0. 0 0 %~2.5 3 % 4.0 7 % - : ; ( ì r r ~. $ : ? ( ol ' ' ' : : -i 0 ( Ð _ . ;: O " z 5 r 0" . . -~ ~ Z 'i e n - 0 $: S " " " . (J . . ( J - (Ð 0 - I 0 IV t r - .¡ ~ o - -+ 0 0 VIVo . . .. kI ' " r C o i p l Cl l c u l o f R _ u e I m P l 8t o f I d h o 20 1 1 O R C 8 l p u F u n d i n El I J . - 1 . 2 0 1 2 Bu r o f R e I m P l . R . I . i I , e n d 2 4 D I 8 L w D e l l Pe t Ra t Av e No r i D d Cu r r Ad j u t s Pr o p o ei li n e SC . Nu m b of En Ba s e Mi l to B a s e Ba Mi l l Ba to Ba !l Ts i D e No . CU S O L ( 1 ) (k W h ) (1 ) Re v u e Pe kW Re v Re v e u e Pe r kW Re v u e Un ¡ i T a B a l : 1 La G e S e d a r 9S 30 , 3 8 1 3, 0 9 , 0 9 , 5 1 4 $1 7 0 , 5 9 , 7 9 8 55 . 2 1 $7 , 1 4 4 , 9 3 4 $1 7 7 , 7 4 1 , 7 3 2 57 . 5 2 4. 1 9 % 2 la r e G e P r i m a 9P 17 9 39 , 5 5 , 3 9 7 $1 8 , 3 7 7 . 8 1 8 46 . 0 0 $7 8 9 , 7 1 4 $1 9 , 1 4 7 , 5 3 47 . 9 2 4. 1 9 % 3 la r G t T r a s m s s i o 9T 2 2, 4 6 8 , 7 4 0 $1 1 5 , 1 3 1 46 . 2 8 $4 , 8 2 2 $1 1 9 , 9 5 46 . 2 0 4. 1 9 % 4 To t S d I e 9 30 , 5 6 3, 4 9 , 1 4 0 , 8 5 1 $1 8 9 , 0 8 , 7 4 7 54 . 1 5 $7 , 9 1 9 , 4 7 0 $1 9 7 , 0 0 9 . 1 7 58 . 2 4. 1 9 % 8 La P o s e c l r y 19 S 1 7, 1 8 8 , 3 0 53 7 , 4 7 1 4l . 7 0 $1 3 , 7 1 3 $3 1 , 1 8 4 47 . 8 1 4. 1 9 % 7 La P o w P r m e 19 P 11 0 1, 9 9 , 0 1 2 , 7 8 2 $8 , 8 9 , 0 7 8 40 . 8 5 53 , 3 8 7 , 9 8 1 $8 , 2 8 , 0 5 42 . 3 5 4. 1 9 % 8 La r P o w T r a s m 19 T 3 43 , l l , 7 1 1 $1 , 6 5 0 , 5 5 37 . 9 4 $8 , 1 7 0 $1 , 7 1 9 , 7 2 39 . 5 3 4. 1 9 % 9 To t S c l e 1 9 11 4 2, 0 4 , 1 l 1 , 7 9 $8 2 , 8 7 2 , 1 0 8 40 . 6 1 $3 , 4 7 0 , 8 6 $8 , 3 4 , 9 7 2 42 . 3 1 4. 1 9 % 11 ln i i o S e r y 24 8 16 , 5 0 7 1, 6 7 9 , 7 7 8 , 7 3 4 $1 0 3 , 0 6 , 5 2 81 . 3 6 $4 , 3 1 6 , 7 2 7 $1 0 7 , 3 8 , 2 5 6 63 . 9 3 4.1 9 % 12 Ir r B l I o T i a o n 24 T 0 0 SO 0. 0 0 SO SO 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 13 T o t S d I e 2 4 18 , 5 0 7 1, 8 7 9 , 7 7 8 , 7 3 $1 0 3 , 0 6 , 5 2 61 . 3 6 $4 , 3 1 6 , 7 2 7 $1 0 7 , 3 8 , 2 5 6 63 . 9 3 4.1 9 % "" W O ~ l i ¡ õ ' N3 Z : : 01 1 0 Z -; ) . 0 N. . - . sa ~ N ( 1 ) 2 0 1 1 T . . V . . S t i p u l i E n e if i ' 5. ~ 1I i : ~ .0 $ C l ~ . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 IDAHO POWER COMPANY . EXHIBIT NO.3. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-II-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 25 of 53 - ; ; ( ì r r s: . ~ ~ o l ' t i : : -. 0 ( Ð _ . :: o - Z 2 ' 0- . . -y 9 Z '" c n - o ~ ¡ ¡ ' " . (J ' " ( ) - (Ð ' " i 0 IV t ; - 0\ - o - .. I Vl 0 0 v. ll i ~ ~ z ! sa , . ~ ~ N" - ' .. e n ~ ( i € j l e. , ID . . !. . ;i g ~ . Li n e~ D e p t i o n 1 S e r v i c e C h a r g e 2 M i n i n u m C h a r g e 3 E n e r g y B l o c 4 ~ 0- 8 0 0 k W h 6 8 0 1 - 2 0 0 k W h 7 O v e r 2 0 0 k W h 8 N o n - s u m m e r 9 0 - 8 kW h 10 8 0 1 - 2 0 0 0 k W h 11 O v r 2 0 0 k W h 12 T o t a l E n e r g y . Id a h o P o w e r C o p a n y Ca l u l a t n o f R e v e n u e I m p a c t St a o f I d a 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a n F u n d i n g Ef c t J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 Re i d e n t i a l S e r v c e SC h e u l e 1 . (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o Pr o p o Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t YH Bm Re v e n u e Ra t e Re v e n u e Di f f r e n c e ~ 4, 7 6 7 , 1 8 6 $4 . 0 0 $1 9 , 0 6 , 7 4 3 $5 . 0 0 $2 3 , 8 3 5 , 9 2 9 $4 , 7 6 7 , 1 8 6 25 . 0 0 % 38 , 1 4 3 $2 . 0 0 $7 6 , 2 8 7 $2 . 0 0 $7 6 , 2 8 7 $0 0. 0 0 % 79 5 , 0 8 3 , 0 6 5 35 6 , 1 7 5 , 2 8 8 62 , 5 2 0 , 8 8 9 2, 2 4 2 , 8 8 , 7 4 6 1, 1 2 0 , 4 3 3 , 5 9 7 42 6 . 4 8 1 1 1 6 7 5, 0 0 3 , 5 7 8 , 7 5 2 0. 0 7 1 0 2 6 0. 0 8 6 5 3 0 0. 1 0 3 3 6 $5 , 4 7 1 , 5 7 0 $3 0 , 8 1 9 , 8 4 8 $6 , 4 9 1 , 9 1 9 $1 4 8 , 6 1 1 , 3 0 0 $8 2 , 4 8 7 , 4 4 2 $3 6 , 1 0 6 , 7 4 9 $3 0 , 9 8 , 8 2 8 $3 0 , 9 8 8 , 8 2 8 ($ 1 , 2 2 4 , 3 6 ) $3 5 9 , 7 6 4 , 4 6 0 $1 , 0 2 4 , 2 n $3 0 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 7 0. 0 6 2 5 9 0. 0 7 3 6 2 1 0. 0 8 2 13 T o t a l E n e r g y R e v n u e a t S t i p u l a t e E n e r g y a n d c u n t r a t e 14 R e c c i l i n g a d j u s t m e n t t o s t p u l a t e n e r g r e v e n u e 15 O r i g i n a l l y m e d T o t l E n e r g y R e v e n u e 16 N o n a l i z i n g R e v e n u e A d j u s t e n t a c c p t e d i n S t i p u l a t i o n 17 R e v i s e T o t l E n e r g y R e v e u e 18 T o t a l R e v e n u e $3 7 9 , 9 3 3 1 7 6 7 0. 0 7 3 9 4 0 0. 0 9 0 1 0. 1 0 8 0 0. 0 6 8 2 9 4 0. 0 7 5 8 0. 0 8 4 6 6 2 $5 , 7 8 8 , 4 4 2 $2 , 3 1 6 , 8 7 2 4. 1 0 % $3 , 0 8 , 6 2 6 $1 , 2 6 , 7 7 8 4. 1 0 % $6 , 7 5 8 , 3 8 3 $2 6 , 4 6 4. 1 0 % $1 5 3 , 1 7 5 , 5 7 1 $4 , 5 6 , 2 7 1 3. 0 7 % $8 , 0 2 2 , 9 8 3 $2 , 5 3 5 , 5 4 1 3. 0 7 % $3 6 , 1 0 6 , 7 4 9 $0 0. 0 0 % $3 7 1 , 9 3 , 7 5 4 $1 0 , 9 4 7 , 9 2 6 3. 0 3 % $3 9 5 , 8 4 8 , 9 7 0 $1 5 , 9 1 5 , 2 0 3 4. 1 9 % . *' *'*'~ ~! 88 I'r .... on ci ....t:al .r N Q. ìb ~on mN~ 1 ..iñ iñ:i c ;;r 1.- ..~ o~.... pj.g ~"hi r ~ii..a.. -- e a:Q. 88 en ..11 S on ~ fì .. ~~ ~~Q:0Q. ¡at L l8 ~l8 NC ìõ-N .o.on_~Q, l" g 3 r r ÑIi ::=~ I ...... 8! !~~; t CO ¡;~Ic ~&i -- :i IV.u!lli ¡~..() a: Q:o 1i ::I;~j~:I ;: i i l rX 88 vQ.cl~l ens-e ~ fì ..iltnl!i I!..N~ I~..lj ~w 0..cil-- 8 a:(J =:I 00 ..~ ci ..I'N iñ....l ..::iñ I CD CD iI CD~~:iIV II C.r .r ~() () 8 §æ .2; .~l~~ §~..N I' v on. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 27 of 53 Exibit No.3 case No. 1PC-11-0 Sement Stipulaton, IPC Page 2 of 24 .Li n e l! De r i D t i o n 1 Se r v i c e C h a r g 2 Min i n u m C h a r g e 3 En e r g y C h a r g e 4 Sy m m e r En e r g y W a t c h H o u r s 6 Al l o t h e r h o u r s 7 No n : s u m m e r 8 0- 8 kW h 9 80 1 - 2 0 0 k W h 10 Ov r 2 0 0 k W h 11 To t a E n e r g y 12 Pr o P O E n e m y C h a r a 13 Su m m e r -: ; n t T 14 On - P e k o. i l š - 15 Of f - P e a k Ö t " r 6 _ . 16 No n - S u m m e r -. 0 i : :: i : Z : = 0 17 Mi d - P e k -~ i : 9 Z 18 Of - P e a k "' C Z - O 19 To t a l E n e r g y S- " ' . r¡ ( l - (J : 4 i 0 (l m - 12 To t a l R e v e n u e N i 00 - 0 -I .. 00 VIW ~f t ~ ~ !! ~ i o c i 0 z ~a : . ~ .. ( I ~ C o f i ' m~ c: . . $l i ~ . . Id a P o w r C o m p a n y Ca l c u l a n o f R e v e n u e I m p a t St a o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t F u n d i n g Ef f c t v e J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 Re a d e t l a l s e r v i c . E n e r g W a t c h P r o SC h e u l . 4 (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s Pr o o s Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e YH Bò Re v e n y e BI Re v e n u e 51 0 $4 . 0 0 $2 , 0 3 8 $5 . 0 0 $2 , 5 4 8 1 $2 . 0 0 $1 $2 . 0 0 $1 (6 ) ( 7 ) Re v e n u e P e r c n t Di f f r e n c e ~ $5 1 0 2 5 . 0 2 % $0 0 . 0 0 % 60 0. 2 0 0 0 0 0 $1 2 1 0. 4 0 0 $2 4 2 $1 2 1 10 0 . 0 0 % 14 8 , 2 8 9 0. 0 7 3 3 6 $1 0 , 8 7 9 30 3 , 2 8 7 0. 0 6 2 5 9 $2 0 , 0 9 5 21 4 , 9 2 4 0. 0 7 3 6 2 1 $1 5 , 8 2 3 76 , 8 3 3 0. 0 8 4 2 $6 , 5 0 5 74 3 , 9 3 9 $5 3 , 4 2 3 53 , 3 8 4 0. 1 0 8 0 9 5 $5 , 7 7 1 $1 , 8 5 4 47 . 3 5 % 94 , 9 0 0. 0 5 9 2 $5 , 6 5 7 ($ 1 , 3 0 6 ) (1 8 . 7 5 ) % 28 5 , 6 2 1 0. 0 7 8 3 4 $2 , 3 7 7 $2 , 0 1 4 9. 8 9 % 30 9 , 4 2 3 0. 0 5 9 6 2 $1 8 , 4 4 2 ($ 3 , 6 1 8 ) (1 6 . 4 0 ) % 74 3 , 9 3 9 $5 2 , 4 8 9 ($ 9 3 4 ) (1 . 7 5 ) % $5 , 4 6 2 $5 5 , 0 3 8 ($ 4 2 4 ) (0 . 7 6 ) % - ~ ( " r r ~. I : x ol ' ' ' : : -. 0 ( l _ . :: 0 ' z g o _0 " 0 . . ~ . Z '" ~ - o I: I : ' " . 0C : : ( " - (l . . , ' 0 N r r - \0 ~ o - .. I VI ( ) W .Un e D e p t j o n rm 1 s e r v i c e C h a r g e 2 M i n i n u m C h a r g e 3 C u r r e n t E n e m y C h a r g e 4 ~ On - P e a k 6 M i d - P e a k 7 O f - P e a k 8 N o n - s u m m e r 9 0 - 8 0 0 k W h 10 8 0 1 - 2 0 0 k W h 11 O v r 2 0 0 k W h 12 T o t a l E n e r g y 13 P r o p o s E n e r g y C h a r g e 14 ~ 15 O n - P e a k 16 O f - P e a k 17 N o n - s y m m e r 18 M i d - P e a k 19 O f f - P e a k 20 T o t a l E n e r g y 21 T o t a l R e v e n u e "t W O ~ .. i : Q l : : :I ~ ~ g, a ! J ~ ~i ~ ë . i: m 5' ~g. . _: d ~ ~ . . Id a h o P o r C o m p a y Ca l l a t n o f R e v e n u e I m p a t St a o f I d h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 R. . l d e n t a l 5 e r v . T l m e . D a y P r o r a Sc h u l e S (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s Pr o Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e U. Em Re v e n u e 8m Re v e n u e 88 2 $4 . 0 0 $3 , 5 2 8 $5 . 0 0 $4 , 4 1 0 1 $2 . 0 0 $2 $2 . 0 0 $2 (6 ) (7 ) Re v e n u e P e r c n t Di f f r e n c e ~ $8 8 2 2 5 . 0 0 % $0 0 . 0 0 % 72 , 0 9 0. 1 0 6 2 1 5 $7 , 6 5 7 42 , 9 1 4 0. 0 7 8 1 4 6 $3 , 3 5 4 13 6 . 9 3 7 0. 0 5 8 5 6 5 $8 , 0 2 0 52 2 , 8 8 6 0. 0 6 2 5 9 $3 , 6 4 31 9 , 8 6 3 0. 0 7 3 6 2 1 $2 3 , 5 4 9 83 , 9 1 8 0. 0 8 4 2 $7 , 1 0 5 1, 1 7 8 , 6 0 8 $8 4 , 3 3 1 90 , 6 9 9 0. 1 1 3 5 0 $1 0 , 2 9 4 $1 , 1 8 3 12 . 9 8 % 16 1 , 2 4 3 0. 0 6 2 5 8 2 $1 0 , 0 9 1 $1 7 2 1. 7 3 % 44 , 8 0 0 0. 0 8 2 6 1 $3 , 5 9 0 $5 , 2 4 6 16 . 7 4 % 48 1 , 8 6 6 0. 0 6 2 5 8 2 $3 0 , 1 5 6 ($ 3 , 8 0 ) (1 1 . 1 9 ) % 1, 1 7 8 , 6 0 $8 7 , 1 3 1 $2 , 8 0 3. 3 2 % $8 7 , 8 6 1 $9 1 , 5 4 3 $3 , 6 8 2 4. 1 9 % - : : ( ' t T ~. r : x o l ' V J : : -. 0 ( l _ . :: g : z g : -~ ~ z "' ~ - 0 r: r : " ' . 0C ! " ( ì - (l " ' ' 0 w t T - o ~ o - .. Ó o VIW ll i ~ CD c i C D e o ui 3 Z ; : o i i 0 Z ~ = . : . ~ .( i ~ W .g , c: r r iI . . $g ~ . . . Id P o w . r C o m p a y ca l c u o n o f R e v e n u e I m p a St a o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef f v e J . . u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 Sm a l l G e n e r a l S e r v c e Sc h e u l e 7 Li n e !i De D t i o n 1 Se r v i c e C h a r g e 2 Mi n i n u m C h a r g e 3 En e r g y C h a r g 4 Su m m e r Q- o o k W h 6 Ov 30 0 kW h 7 Su m m e r E n e r g y 8 No n § u m m e r 9 0- 3 0 0 kW h 10 Ov e r 30 0 kW h 11 No n - S u m m e r E n e r g y 12 To t a l E n e r g y 13 To t a l R e v e n u e (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s e Pr o o s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t UK Bi Re n u e Bi Re n u e Dj f f r e n c e ~ 34 0 , 2 0 8 . 4 $4 . 0 0 $1 , 3 6 0 , 8 3 4 $5 . 0 0 $1 , 7 0 1 , 0 4 2 $3 0 , 2 0 8 25 . 0 0 % 1, 1 0 0 . 3 $2 . 0 0 $2 , 2 0 1 $2 . 0 0 $2 , 2 0 1 $0 0. 0 0 % 16 , 8 8 0 , 8 4 1 0. 0 8 3 0 7 5 $1 , 4 0 2 , 3 7 6 0. 0 8 7 4 4 $1 , 4 3 0 , 5 5 0 $2 8 , 1 7 4 2. 0 1 % 20 , 8 7 2 , 1 0 4 0. 0 9 9 1 1 $2 , 0 6 , 4 8 1 0. 1 0 2 0 3 0 $2 , 1 2 9 , 5 8 1 $6 5 , 1 0 0 3. 1 5 % 37 , 7 5 2 , 9 4 5 $3 , 4 6 , 8 5 7 $3 , 5 6 0 , 1 3 1 $9 3 , 2 7 4 2. 6 9 % 49 , 2 2 2 , 5 7 4 0. 0 8 3 0 7 5 $4 , 0 8 9 , 1 6 5 0. 0 8 4 7 4 4 $4 , 1 7 1 , 3 1 8 $8 2 , 1 5 3 2. 0 1 % 61 , 9 7 1 , 1 5 2 0. 0 8 7 8 1 1 $5 , 4 4 1 , 7 4 9 0. 0 8 9 1 9 6 $5 , 5 2 7 , 5 7 9 $8 , 8 3 0 1. 5 8 % 11 1 , 1 9 3 , 7 2 5 $9 , 5 3 , 9 1 4 $9 , 6 9 8 , 8 9 7 $1 6 7 , 9 8 3 1. 7 6 % 14 8 , 9 4 , 6 7 0 $1 2 , 9 9 7 , 7 7 1 $1 3 , 2 5 9 , 0 2 8 $2 6 1 , 2 5 7 2. 0 1 % $1 4 , 3 6 , 8 0 $1 4 , 9 6 2 , 2 7 1 $6 1 , 4 6 5 4. 1 9 % - ; ; ( J t T s: . t \ t ¡ o l ' ' " : : -. 0 ( l _ . ;: g : z g -~ ~ Z "' c n - o t\ f t " ' . OQ . . ( J - (l ' " ' 0 w t i - i - - o - .. I VI 0 0 W "l f ( ' ~ l I I ~ Øl z ; : sa ~ ~ N - . .. w : : w :: \ 1 I i p II . . g. . _: : l i ~ . Li n e No De p t i o n 1 Se r v i c e C h a r g e 2 Mi n i n u m C h a r g e 3 Ba s i c C h a r g e 4 Su m m e r a n d N o n - u m m e r 0- 2 0 k W 6 Ov r 2 0 k W 7 To t a l B a s i c C h a r g e 8 De a n d C h a r g e 9 0- 2 0 k W 10 Su m m e r a n d N o n - 5 u m m e r 11 Ov e r 2 0 k W 12 Su m m e r 13 No n - 5 u m m e r 14 To t a l D e m a n d 15 En e r g y C h a r g e 16 Su m m e r 17 0- 2 0 0 0 kW h 18 Ov r 2 0 0 0 k W h 19 No n - 5 u m m e r 20 0-2 0 0 kW h 21 Ov e r 2 0 0 k W h 22 To t a l E n e r g y 23 To t a l R e v e n u e . . Id a P o w e r C o m p a y Ca l c u l a t o n o f R e v e n u e I m p a St a o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef f c t e J a n u a 1 , 2 0 1 2 La e G e n e r a s e r v c e Sc u l e 9 S e n d a r s e r v c e (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s e Pr o p o s Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t !! Bm Re v e n u e Bs Re v n u e Di f f r e n c e Q! 36 4 , 5 7 1 . 4 $1 4 . 4 3 $5 , 2 6 0 , 7 6 5 $1 6 . 0 0 $5 , 8 3 3 , 1 4 2 $5 7 2 , 3 7 7 10 . 8 8 % 59 3 . 9 5. 0 0 $2 , 9 6 9 5. 0 0 $2 , 9 6 9 $0 0. 0 0 % 5, 4 2 6 , 6 5 0. 0 0 $0 0. 0 0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 7, 7 8 1 , 1 6 5 0. 7 8 $6 , 0 6 9 , 3 0 9 0. 9 5 $7 , 3 9 2 , 1 0 7 $1 , 3 2 2 , 7 9 8 21 . 7 9 % 13 , 2 0 7 , 8 2 1 $6 , 0 6 9 , 3 0 9 $7 , 3 9 2 , 1 0 7 $1 , 3 2 2 , 7 9 8 21 . 7 9 % 4, 6 4 7 , 5 3 1 $0 . 0 0 $0 $0 . 0 0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 1, 5 0 1 , 8 5 4. 6 1 $6 , 9 2 3 , 5 5 5 5. 5 9 $8 , 3 9 5 , 3 7 3 $1 , 4 7 1 , 8 1 8 21 . 2 6 % 3, 9 6 5 , 8 7 9 3. 6 8 $1 4 , 5 9 4 , 4 3 5 4. 1 0 $1 6 , 2 6 0 , 1 0 5 $1 , 6 6 5 , 6 7 0 11 . 4 1 % 10 , 1 1 5 , 2 6 6 $2 1 , 5 1 7 , 9 9 $2 4 , 6 5 5 , 4 7 8 $3 , 1 3 7 , 4 8 8 14 . 5 8 % 15 0 , 6 8 9 , 9 5 5 0. 0 9 0 1 2 2 $1 3 , 5 8 0 , 4 8 0 0. 0 9 1 3 8 5 $1 3 , 7 7 0 , 8 0 2 $1 9 0 , 3 2 2 1. 4 0 67 9 , 9 1 8 , 2 9 4 0. 0 3 8 3 9 $2 , 2 7 1 , 3 6 3 0. 0 3 9 1 8 4 $2 6 , 6 4 1 , 9 1 8 $3 7 0 , 5 5 5 1. 4 1 % 43 5 , 8 2 0 , 8 6 9 0. 0 8 0 7 $3 5 , 0 4 3 , 0 4 9 0. 0 8 1 6 8 2 $3 5 , 5 9 8 , 7 2 0 $5 5 5 , 6 7 1 1. 5 9 % 1, 8 2 3 , 6 6 7 . 3 9 7 0. 0 3 4 $6 2 , 8 5 0 , 8 7 3 0. 0 3 5 0 1 0 $6 3 . 8 4 , 5 9 6 $9 9 5 , 7 2 3 1. 5 8 % 3, 0 9 . 0 9 , 5 1 4 $1 3 7 , 7 4 5 , 7 6 5 $1 3 9 , 8 5 8 . 0 3 6 $2 , 1 1 2 , 2 7 1 1. 5 3 % $1 7 0 , 5 9 6 , 7 9 8 $1 7 7 , 7 4 1 , 7 3 2 $7 , 1 4 4 , 9 3 4 4. 1 9 % -; ; ( ì I T S2 . I I X ot ' t n : : .. 0 C D _ . :: c : z g : c: 0 . . -~ . Z '" ~ - o II I I ' " . (J : ì ( ì - CD - . , i 0 w t r - N ~ o - .. I Vl 0 0 W "' ! o ~ l 1 I ~ .. z : = sa a 9 ~ ~~ ~ è . ~ i I~$2 ~ . . . Id a h o P o e r C o m p a y Ca l u l a n o f R e v e n u e I m p a St o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef f t i J a n u a r 1 , 2 0 1 2 La G e n e r a S e r v c e SC h e u l e 9 P r i m a r S e r v c e (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s Pr o p o s e d Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v n u e Pe r c n t .u Bi Re y u e Ra t e Re v e n u e Di f f r e n c e Qw 2, 1 4 5 . 7 $2 4 7 . 2 7 $5 3 0 , 5 6 7 $2 8 5 . 0 0 $6 1 1 , 5 2 5 $8 , 9 5 8 15 _ 2 6 % 0. 2 10 . 0 0 $2 10 . 0 0 $2 $0 0. 0 0 % 1, 2 0 3 , 7 5 8 1. 1 2 $1 , 3 4 , 2 0 9 1. 1 8 $1 , 4 2 0 , 4 3 5 $7 2 , 2 2 6 5. 3 6 % 25 7 , 1 6 8 4. 2 4 $1 , 0 9 0 , 3 9 1 4. 7 5 $1 , 2 2 1 , 5 4 7 $1 3 1 , 1 5 6 12 . 0 3 % 72 3 , 1 1 7 3. 9 1 $2 , 8 2 7 , 3 8 6 4. 1 6 $3 , 0 0 , 1 6 5 $1 8 0 , 7 7 9 6. 3 9 % 98 0 , 2 8 4 $3 , 9 1 7 , 7 7 7 $4 , 2 2 , 7 1 2 $3 1 1 , 9 3 5 7. 9 6 % 23 9 , 3 8 8 0. 7 9 $1 8 9 , 1 1 7 0. 8 8 $2 1 0 , 6 6 1 $2 1 , 5 4 11 . 3 9 % 29 , 2 6 3 , 1 5 5 0. 0 3 7 9 5 3 $1 , 1 1 0 , 6 2 5 0_ 0 3 8 7 1 0 $1 , 1 3 2 , 7 7 7 $2 , 1 5 2 1. 9 9 % 45 , 6 5 0 , 2 3 9 0. 0 3 4 5 1 1 $1 , 5 7 5 , 4 3 5 0. 0 3 5 1 9 3 $1 , 6 0 , 5 6 $3 1 , 1 3 4 1. 9 8 % 29 , 4 9 6 , 9 9 8 0. 0 3 2 2 5 4 $9 5 1 , 3 9 6 0. 0 3 2 8 9 2 $9 7 0 , 2 1 5 $1 8 , 8 1 9 1. 9 8 % 10 4 , 4 1 0 , 3 9 2 $3 , 6 3 7 , 4 5 6 $3 , 7 0 9 , 5 6 1 $7 2 , 1 0 5 1. 9 8 % 18 4 , 1 8 6 , 7 9 3 0. 0 3 0 1 2 7 $5 , 5 4 8 , 9 9 6 0. 0 3 0 8 5 3 $5 , 6 8 2 , 7 1 5 $1 3 3 , 7 1 9 2. 4 1 % 11 0 , 9 5 8 , 2 1 2 0. 0 2 8 8 9 1 $3 , 2 0 5 , 6 9 4 0. 0 2 9 5 8 7 $3 , 2 8 2 , 9 2 1 $7 7 , 2 2 7 2. 4 1 % 29 5 , 1 4 5 , 0 0 5 $8 , 7 5 4 , 6 9 0 $8 , 9 6 , 6 3 6 $2 1 0 , 9 4 2. 4 1 % 39 9 , 5 5 5 , 3 9 7 $1 2 , 3 9 2 , 1 4 6 $1 2 , 6 7 5 , 1 9 7 $2 8 3 , 0 5 1 2. 2 8 % $1 8 , 3 7 7 , 8 1 8 $1 9 , 1 4 7 , 5 3 2 $7 6 9 , 7 1 4 4. 1 9 % Li n e~ De s c r o t i o n 1 Se r v i c e C h a r g e 2 Mi n i n u m C h a r g e 3 Ba s i c C h a r g e 4 To t a l B a s i c C h a r g 5 De m a n d C h a r g e 6 Su m m e r 7 No n - 5 u m m e r 8 To t a l D e a n d 9 On - P e a k S u m m e r 10 En e r g y C h a r g e 11 On - p e a k 12 Mi d - p a k 13 Of a k 14 Su m m e r E n e r g y C h a r g e 15 Mi d - P e a k 16 Of - p a k 17 No n - 5 u m m e r E n e r g y C h r g e 18 To t a l E n e r g y C h a r g e 19 To t a l R e v e n u e . I! *' "$*'"$ "$;*'*' *' "$*'"$ "$ ~ *'*' r:8 ~S~~l8 .. .. ..0....01 is . ia ""ia ca r-I'.. ir ci CI ci u:~...... .................... §i C'01 N ..;¡8 01 C'ä il CD co N!.. 10 Si_49~ ~I ~-~a..... ê I .,.....,., fl ..tfl fl ., ~~a: 0 00 N 10 ..~~ ¡ Ø) co ~2~§10 C' i fl ..Sl ~~ ::~10 ,,1. ; N .... ..01 ~~rD oi ~..~oi..å ..('¡~oi., ...,., fl &l~..fl .. ~ ~i! ~ ll a. a: 88 C'..0 co N co 2l .. C' ~lil CD ", 0 co 8 ~ C'~~ ir ci ci ....c:t; ~ PI o Ø) co ..a~~000 a.c: c: c:00 11 iN C ~i 01 CD 01 l8 A ;¡ 0 C'~ co N 81 !i .. ¡;.. ",.. .... ..C' j c'"8 .2 ..0 ....NO N.... =,0 '! J ~ I iõ ~i~~..~~t,ij ~Ñ iì iõ iõ u. N M ~ 91 c .,.,&l~t;.. & I 0 c ~ii i .,¡;-:Jca~.u tjl ¡"! !(, ai a: ..i-- ='I~ ~i~! i-. GIa.cl(Il C) .!r:8 :8 8 ie Ø)co CD .... 10 01 ~l='N ~ 9l! ..e; õ i t: è3 j g ~ am ~l ~c:c:"M c:..~..01 co ", ..SoB ~n~~:: i!~ ~ iW (,ci ci c:ci ci 00 ..l~æ C5 01 C' C'10 ~ ¡;is 0 ~$.. 10 ",..",.........N ..10 01 .. oi ..",fl ~~~i rD ~E rD ~l\A..co..NN "'.~N I ~ Gl J: Gl E!(, E!..II ~Gl ~~J:E!eiII(,CD I G E IV II II II I i c .s::W ei ei r II .. "C (f ..(,Gl IV IV J: Gl i:II ~:: J: J:.~.i c:E ei c u (,E IV ~ J: W ~.. E l .i.i.i ...i .¥ E II ~ §:;c:CD ::IIIVIV~t3 l' ::W a:.- i:E Cf-8 c: ~l! §Or R (f l l~ .2 E c l':2 8 gCD .- ai i2 :: 0-(f :I (f z i2 O:lO(f :I Z ~~..N C' ",IOCOr-CO Ø)O..NC'",10 co ..co 01~., -r...............Exhibit No.3 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E.11-0 settment Stipulati, IPC Case No. IPC-E-II-8 Pag 8 of 24 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 33 of 53 . -; : ( ì t T ~. I : x ol ' O O : : -. 0 ( 1 _ . :: c : z g : _ u c : 0 . . . Z '" ~ - 0 I: I : ' " . (J : : ( ì - (1 . . , ' 0 w t T - ~ ~ o - .. I VI 0 0 W J' ~ ~ ~ ig i a i ~ co ¡ z = a: : p ~ N" ' - ' .l ~ w l~~ . . Id a h o P o w r C o m p a y Ca l u l n o f R e v e n u I m St a o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t n F u n d i n g Ef J a n u . - 1 , 2 0 1 2 Du s k - t o D a w C u s t e r U g h t n g Sc e d u l e 1 5 Li n e t: De r i D t i o n 1 ~ 2 10 0 W a t S o d i u m V a p o r ( A ) 3 20 0 - W a t t S o d i u m V a p o r ( A ) 4 4O D W a t S o i u m V a p o r ( A ) 5 2O D W a t t S o i u m V a p o r ( D ) 4O D W a t t S o d i u m V a p o r ( D ) 7 4O D W a t t M e l H a l i d ( D ) 8 10 0 W a t t M e t a H a l i d e ( D ) 9 To t a l 10 Mi n i n u m C h a r g e 11 To t a l R e v e n u e (0 ) (1 ) ~ !l 99 , 8 8 2 3, 8 9 5 , 3 5 0 8, 3 9 5 62 1 , 2 1 0 1, 2 8 7 20 2 , 0 5 2 9, 3 3 9 69 1 , 0 9 2 5, 3 9 3 84 , 6 1 4 78 5 12 1 , 6 9 8 50 9 18 4 , 0 7 9 12 5 , 5 9 0 6, 5 6 2 , 0 9 5 20 9 . 5 (2 ) Cu r r n t Sa s e Em 7. 2 0 11 . 6 5 18 . 6 7 14 . 1 7 21 . 1 8 23 . 6 8 43 . 2 0 3. 0 0 (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Pr o p o s e d Pr o o s Ba s e Sa s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t Re v e n u e Em Re v e n u e Di f f r e n c e ~ $7 1 9 , 1 5 0 8. 5 6 $8 5 4 , 9 9 0 $1 3 5 , 8 4 0 18 . 8 9 % $9 7 , 8 0 2 10 . 2 4 $8 , 9 6 5 $( 1 1 , 8 3 7 ) (1 2 . 1 0 ) % $2 4 , 0 2 8 14 . 0 0 $1 8 , 0 1 8 $( 6 , 0 1 0 ) (2 5 . 0 1 ) % $1 3 2 , 3 3 12 . 3 9 $1 1 5 , 7 1 0 $( 1 6 , 6 2 4 ) (1 2 . 5 6 ) % $1 1 4 , 2 2 4 14 . 6 8 $7 9 , 1 6 9 $( 3 5 , 0 5 5 ) (3 0 . 6 9 ) % $1 8 , 5 8 9 13 . 4 4 $1 0 , 5 5 0 $( 8 , 0 3 9 ) (4 3 . 2 5 ) % $2 1 , 9 8 9 21 . 5 8 $1 0 , 9 8 4 $( 1 1 , 0 0 5 ) (5 0 . 0 5 ) % 1, 1 2 8 , 1 1 6 1, 1 7 5 , 3 8 $4 7 , 2 7 0 4. 1 9 % 62 8 3. 0 0 62 8 $0 0. 0 0 % $1 , 1 2 8 , 7 4 4 $1 , 1 7 6 , 0 1 4 $4 7 , 2 7 0 4. 1 9 % -: ; ( J t n ~. ~ x Ot " V l : r -. 0 ( ' _ . ;: 0 " Z s r 0" 0 - -~ . Z 'i e n - 0 ~ S " ' i . (J : : ( J - (' . " ' 0 w t r - \J ~ o - .. , VI 0 0 W " ! l ( ' ~ Il l ! 1 \ : : CD i r l a ' ~3 z ; : o C D 0 z a a : . p N( J ~ W .. . g ì ! ~ i II ~ $. g ~ . Li n e No De P t o n Se r v c e C h a r g e 2 B a s i c C h a r g e 3 T o t l B a s i c C h a r g e De m a n d C h a r g e 5 S u m m e r 6 N o n - S u m m e r 7 T o t a l D e m a n d C h a r g e 8 O n - P e a k S u m m e r 9 E n e r g y C h a r g e 10 O n - p a k 11 M i d - p a k 12 O f - p k 13 S u m m e r E n e r y C h a r g e 14 M i d - P e a k 15 O f - p a k 16 N o n - S u m m e r E n e r g y C h r g e 17 T o t a l E n e r g y C h a r g e 18 T o t a l R e v e n u e . . Id a h o P o w e r C o m p a n y Ca l u l a t i n o f R e w n u e I m p a St o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef f J a n u a 1 , 2 0 1 2 La P o w r s e r v c e Sc h e d u l e 1 9 S e o n a r (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s Pr o p o s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v n u e Pe r c n t UK Ra t e Re v e n u e Ra t e Re v e n u e Di f f r e n c e ~ 12 . 0 $1 4 . 3 8 $1 7 3 $3 9 . 0 0 $4 8 $2 5 17 0 . 5 2 % 16 , 0 2 7 0. 7 8 $1 2 , 5 0 1 0. 8 6 $1 3 , 7 8 3 $1 , 2 8 2 10 . 2 6 % 3, 1 3 2 3. 9 2 $1 2 , 2 7 9 5. 5 5 $1 7 , 3 8 5 $5 , 1 0 6 41 . 5 8 % 11 , 4 2 2 3. 6 7 $4 1 , 9 1 9 3. 9 7 $4 5 , 3 4 6 $3 , 4 2 7 8. 1 8 % 14 , 5 5 5 $5 , 1 9 8 $6 2 , 7 3 1 $8 , 5 3 3 15 . 7 4 % 2, 8 2 2 0. 7 9 $2 , 2 3 0 0. 9 5 $2 , 6 8 1 $4 5 1 20 . 2 2 % 38 8 , 2 9 1 0. 0 5 1 8 6 3 $2 0 , 1 3 8 0. 0 5 2 7 6 5 $2 0 , 4 8 8 $3 5 0 1. 7 4 % 67 8 , 7 4 8 0. 0 3 9 7 4 1 $2 6 , 9 7 4 0. 0 4 0 3 4 3 $2 7 , 3 8 3 $4 0 9 1. 5 2 % 47 4 , 0 5 0 0. 0 3 4 5 5 5 $1 6 , 3 8 1 0. 0 3 5 0 3 0 $1 6 , 6 0 6 $2 5 1. 3 7 % 1, 5 4 1 , 0 8 9 $6 , 4 9 3 $6 , 4 7 7 $9 1. 5 5 % 3, 3 1 5 , 6 6 2 0. 0 3 6 1 2 $1 2 1 , 3 9 3 0. 0 3 7 0 4 1 $1 2 2 , 8 1 5 $1 , 4 2 2 1. 1 7 % 2, 3 0 9 , 5 5 2 0. 0 3 1 8 1 7 $7 3 , 4 8 0. 0 3 2 1 4 0 $7 4 , 2 2 9 $7 4 6 1. 0 2 % 5, 6 2 5 , 2 1 4 $1 9 4 , 8 7 6 $1 9 7 , 0 4 $2 , 1 6 8 1. 1 1 % 7, 1 6 6 , 3 0 3 $2 5 8 , 3 6 9 $2 6 1 , 5 2 1 $3 , 1 5 2 1. 2 2 % $3 2 7 , 4 7 1 $3 4 1 , 1 8 4 $1 3 , 7 1 3 4. 1 9 % -: ; ( ) t T ~. t i ; . Ot " V l : : -. 0 ( l _ . ;: g : Z g : -u 9 Z '" V l - o ti S ' " . (J : : ( ) - (l . , . ' 0 w t r - 0\ ~ o - .. I VI 0 0 i. li ~ ~ CI J I l 5 .. z : : .. 0 z o a . . 0 ~ ( I = t ( . .. - 8 ~ c: m l. : : :: 6 _ a i ~ . . . Id a h o P o w r C o m p a n y Ca l c u l o n o f R e v e u e I m p a c St a o f I d a 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a n F u n d i n g Ef c t J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 La r g P o w e r S e r v SC h e u l e 19 P r i m a r y (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s e Pr o o s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t lJ Ra t e Re v e n y e 8m Re v e n u e Di f f r e n c e ~ 1, 3 1 6 . 0 0 $2 4 7 . 2 7 $3 2 5 , 4 0 7 $2 9 9 . 0 0 $3 9 3 , 4 8 $6 , 0 7 7 20 . 9 2 % 4, 7 4 3 , 2 7 0 1. 1 2 $5 , 3 1 2 , 4 6 2 1. 1 8 $5 , 5 9 7 , 0 5 8 $2 8 4 , 5 9 6 5. 3 6 % 1, 0 5 1 , 4 9 1 4. 2 4 $4 , 4 5 8 . 3 2 0 5. 6 5 $5 , 9 4 0 , 9 2 2 $1 , 4 8 2 , 6 0 2 33 . 2 5 % 3, 0 2 4 , 9 5 0 3. 9 1 $1 1 , 8 2 7 , 5 5 5 4. 1 8 $1 2 , 6 4 4 , 2 9 2 $8 1 6 , 7 3 7 6. 9 1 % 4, 0 7 6 , 4 4 1 $1 6 , 2 8 5 , 8 7 5 $1 8 , 5 8 , 2 1 4 $2 , 2 9 9 , 3 3 9 14 . 1 2 % 99 6 , 7 6 6 0. 7 9 $7 8 7 , 4 4 5 0. 8 9 $8 7 , 1 2 2 $9 9 , 6 7 7 12 . 6 6 % 13 0 , 9 5 7 , 3 4 0. 0 4 1 8 1 9 $5 , 4 7 6 , 5 0 5 0. 0 4 2 3 0 $5 , 5 4 0 , 0 2 0 $6 , 5 1 5 1. 1 6 % 21 7 , 5 4 2 , 1 8 2 0. 0 3 1 8 5 6 $6 , 9 3 0 , 0 2 4 0. 0 3 2 1 2 8 $6 , 9 8 9 , 1 9 5 $5 9 , 1 7 1 0. 8 5 % 16 0 , 5 9 1 , 6 0 0. 0 2 7 6 9 2 $4 , 4 4 7 , 1 0 3 0. 0 2 7 8 7 1 $4 , 4 7 5 , 8 4 9 $2 8 , 7 4 6 0. 6 5 % 50 , 0 9 1 , 1 3 2 $1 6 , 8 5 3 . 3 2 $1 7 , 0 0 5 , 0 6 $1 5 1 , 4 3 2 0. 9 0 % 87 1 , 8 4 3 , 7 2 8 0. 0 2 9 4 9 0 $2 5 , 7 1 0 , 6 7 2 0. 0 2 9 8 6 1 $2 6 , 0 3 4 , 1 2 6 $3 2 3 , 4 5 4 1. 2 6 % 60 9 , O n , 9 2 1 0. 0 2 5 6 3 $1 5 . 6 1 8 , 5 8 5 0. 0 2 5 9 0 8 $1 5 , 7 7 9 , 9 9 1 $1 6 1 , 4 0 1. 0 3 % 1, 4 8 , 9 2 1 , 6 5 0 $4 1 , 3 2 9 , 2 5 7 $4 1 , 8 1 4 , 1 1 7 $4 , 8 6 1. 1 7 % 1, 9 9 0 , 0 1 2 , 7 8 2 $5 8 , 1 8 2 , 8 8 9 $5 , 8 1 9 , 1 8 1 $6 3 6 , 2 9 2 1. 0 9 % $8 , 8 9 4 . 0 7 8 $8 , 2 8 2 , 0 5 9 $3 , 3 8 7 , 9 8 1 4. 1 9 % Li n e f: De c r p t i o n Se r v i c e C h a r g 2 B a s i c C h a r g e 3 T o t a l B a s i c C h a r g De m a n d C h a m e 5 S u m m e r 6 N o n - 5 u m m e r 7 T o t a l D e m a n d C h a r g e 8 O n - P e a k S u m m e r 9 En e r g y C h a r g 10 On - p a k 11 Mi d - p e a k 12 Of f - p a k 13 Su m m e r E n e r g y C h a r g e 14 Mi d - P e a k 15 Of f - p a k 16 No n - 5 u m m e r E n e r g y C h r g e 17 To t a l E n e r g y C h a r g e 18 To t a l R e v n u e . E II §: lI ~~. -11 I~ ~Æ:o ll a: ~lu ¡ll .I '~N r.Ë 1&i5 i. N § Ii 15~(S;i,,¡. ieii~lll~l;g B ~ ~~ fi Ñ~IlJ~ :J Æ ò:() 6 Ii II l .. I! I~ a. .. CD .! ei ::~i & 1: iM~Ilc:~:i Æ() a: -..~~ ~ciN ~..Cl !c:..Cl 51 m ,.N ã ° ~ il I:N.. iI iI iI S 8lB~..~,N.. iI iI iI iI~~~~ c: c: c: c: iI iI iI~8~ .- ci .. in Ø) ~~ ~ inrs rr aiCl fi Cl Ø) Ø) CI S ~ rõc: å"'~ ,.Cl ~ N..Ø) co S Iõ~~ ci c: ~ ~;zin,. N~""Ñ~ai ..N ~ Vi ~g c: c: e- ° B~~,. ai ir ':~;z ~rtÑ"'.. .. e- iI lSc: ~.... in,.N ~ ~~~~,. ,.Cl"~ N.... ~ co e- e- N~f8~~* Cl fi .. Cl Ic:..Cl R.. ¡ æ ~ ~:g :t e- . liai~ai:: N ~Cl Cl W ~rt..Cl cocoin,.° f' e- ..,. e- .. N rr .. in c:C" co ~..ww_i ~ ~..Cl ~,.ai..f'...Cl incoci ~8it),':mc: CI .. Ø) !8 l8 ;l.... ,.gB~ c: c: c: ~m L..Cl I. ii e- CO Ø)~ ~;z !~§~w ¡rs..fI ~~~irr c: . ci'e-co..¡.... .. Cl Cl fi '"..f' C'..Cl ....,. ~et. ~ I II Q).s Q)ei () ei "-II :0 lD CD CD .s ei eiIIEuei I õ E Q)II. I i c:.s Ql :J W ()ei i~ .. og en ..Q):i II .s ~ i ~Q):0 c:.s .W E ei !().s lØ .. E E Q) ~t~ ..ii §lD Æ c: ~ ~ ~IT c: .~II II Ql W a:c:!~:~8. ~ CJ 2:. j E E c: .s 0 :2 8 lš l ~Æ ~J3~ ~O~OCl ~ Z I- ~~N e-in co f'CI CJ0..Ne-. II co ,.CI~.......... .......Exibit No. 3 Case No. IPC-E-11-0 Exhibit No. 101 selement Stipulatn, IPC Case No. IPC-E-11-8 Page 12 of 24 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page37of53 ~ci 8 ie"'t' ¡ ~ CJ N .. i: ie ~ .. rs rtN in,. CJ,. ci Ø) ~ in ~,. f6.... f'gB~ c: c: c: ~....N ig8f8~CIØ)..O ig ': ;l rtNÕ..~rr it. Ñ.. . . . li gi~ B. i~ls :ififiljg":~Jll i E'õ'õŠ.1iQ. stili ll(I~iš'O:i C)~- u ..i; ..u fi 8li c: c:08 ¡ .ai(l 'E ~¡lš) ~ tXi E:Il !è ~I~ &! b ~l5li::~ Q.Æ£ a: _lll$ :! fÆ à:1 Il M~ II i..::ÆU a: ~~ ll$ ~8Æà: ~:: "$ '# ':g_ co0-~ ~ ci1' ~~ico 1'ii~~ ~ 10 CO üS .. ..M1~~!.. 00001010~M~., CO _ CO~~..~atæN_~.. CD co 0-.. 10ac M ~-., l1 - 0 10~g~ .. CD co ,. .," co CO.. '#"* "*10 0 10..0.. it ci it.. - ~i~ &i &i1' 1' &i &i ~i~CO COM M1' 1'.. .. å å ;, 8 eQ ci ~i~ ~ ~ & & 10 0co 0 it ci ~8~lt~M..iñ "$ "*..0Q) 0 C' ci ~i ..i 8 :g1'..có~ il COcó iñ~a ~~ CO MCD ..- CO ,. ..""..~ .. It_ CD~ ;,~~ ci ci CO Itm~MÑ m Pi .. iñ~a .. It10 ~ l (l ci ci _1'f:~l~ ri iëIt .. *-.. ..1'.. lD C; ~ l81' ~..o-., o ~oci It COCO _.. CDlDÑ~ ;,..ò..~ ~lå-., 1' ¡ci o~.. .. Sf iëco .. ~~ c:0 I ~~01: r~ c:c: II fS = :-c: i ei i lQ s: s:~51 Q) ~: e. ~1I~~II es c:lQ en U s: .i ~ !!c7 "S E c: ~ 8 ~;i ..e a 2 _ s:o~E!! l c: ~ g - lQ ~II w.-~~ff ff i :: :: l-I- ~~- 1' CO ..co ..CD Q) s:_1'CO- -- Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-II-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page38of53 Exibit No.3 case No. IPc..11-0 sement Stiula, IPC Page 13 of 24 .. " " n m ~. r i ; X Ot ' V l : : -. 0 ( l _ . :: e r Z 2 : er - .. ~ 9 Z "' ~ - 0 ri r i " ' . (J . . n . . (l ' " 1 0 W t r . . \0 ~ o . . .. i \J C X W ~l t 0 ~ '8 ~ I g ; ~3 z " " .D . 0 z g, a . : " 9 ~~ ~ c . "0 m 5. i l~~. g ~ . Li n e 1m De s c D t i o n 1 Bil l s - I n S e a s o n 2 Bi l s - u t S e a s o n 3 De m a n d C h a r g e 4 To t a l l n - S e a s o n To t a l O u - S a s o n 6 To t a l k W 7 En e r g y C h a r g e 8 Fi r s t 1 6 4 k W h p e r k W 9 Al l O t h e r k W h I n - S e a s o n 10 To t a l O u t - S a s n 11 To t a l E n e r g y 12 To t a l R e v n u e . . Id a h o P o w r C o m p a y Ca l c u l a n o f R e v e n u e I m p a St a o f I d a h o 20 1 1 O R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef f c t J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 Ag r i c u l t r a l I r r g a t o n S e r v i c e Sc h e u l e 2 4 T r a n s m i s i o n (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s e Pr o p o Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t lA B. Re y e n y e B. Re v n u e Di f f ! J t n c e ~ 0. 0 $2 4 8 . 2 2 $0 $2 9 9 . 0 0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 3. 4 6 $0 3. 5 0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 5. 3 2 $0 6. 1 6 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 0. 0 0 $0 0. 0 0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 $0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 0. 0 4 6 5 3 $0 0. 0 4 9 2 3 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 0. 0 4 2 3 8 2 $0 0. 0 4 2 3 8 2 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 0. 0 5 2 5 0 9 $0 0. 0 5 2 3 7 7 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 $0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % $0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % . Il ~~"$ß'Q) Ë .... ci ci ~~ li li It 13~'I II 'I i§:~ 0: . o It It li_..CI'I_..It -1.1 ..ic 8-0....- !! c.f!;..e - i: 0: 8~,. ~lJl c: ,.æfi0ci a. I aI o It ~It,¡ N 8 _....~ "&'!"'-,... Iii §N "i .1 ..0 Ñ !llÎi aJ fi ~~,!s -::f!....-fi.! .() I;-c!~cl ¡ Uiil ¡i 8~Q) ë 0"'~.N~ lll tl ~ -l ~~ E ..::f!ciC:;() o It .. ~~~ ~ ri g..N tD.... I .! ~Gl:= ai ,.::CD .i ~c:Õ ()~ .. E c:Gl.. ::W 0: E .~l j:: .-~z :: ~~..N It. Exhibit No. i 0 i Case No. IPC-E- i i-8 R. Lobb, Staff i 0/07 II i Page 40 of 53 Exhibit No. 3 Case No. IPCE-11-D Settment StilaiOn, IPC Page 15 of 24 . il ;P ~~;P ~C'oCO8~ E ;;ici~Æ N~.. .. ~*l~~! I i~w ,. :g§: J.~ ~---- C'8~~~ il C' C' "hi ~~a ~~t;..Il-- 0 II Il à: ¡ ~i 9ll~ &I Q. l fN ;!~8~:g~ i-S CO 0 C'C' Ii :i~"hi u) ai iñ eo~..sll ,. ! 11.~Il ..E 0 c-rZ ;Il 8 iii i rõm~ Il.ci . I ~ õ ii~! '5ci!a.cjii :i .s .8 0 U J i §:lJ!l IIl u ~w ûS ß fa 0 E: ll 8~ ¡~.q ,j jC IV 8 !! II C c,S: jc~l!!.s._.- s !~!.s:~ it~ t~-_llIl i.e ãglèliHH iUll00 '0 II . ~ I :¡c(1l1l00 l! 0:: Z .. l' CO .. 10. g;-.. ¡eo....Il ~. §l ~ ~,. ~~ ~¡ C' rt..o rj ljC II .c I~~a: i¡ s ~ t= t=l- eo ,.co Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 41 of 53 Exhibit No. 3 Case No. IPCE-11-08 Settlent Stipulation, IPC Page 16 0124 . -: ; ( ì t i ~. ~ ; x ot " t n : : -. 0 C D _ . ;: g : z g -~ ~ Z 'i v : - 0 ~S " ' " . 0C : : ( ì - CD ~ ' " 0 .¡ t r - tv ~ o - .. I VI 0 0 W "l o ~ !, ! g -. ~ 0 z 9. _ : - ! : ~c n ~ w -. g i em5" ~ gg ~ . Id o P o w e r C o p a n y Ca l c l a i o n o f R e v e n u e I m p a St o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t o n F u n d i n g Ef f t i v e J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 Sc h e u l e 4 1 . S t r e t L i g h t i n g s e r v e ( c o n t d ) (1 ) (2 ) Cu r r n t Ba s e Bå (3 ) Cu r r t Ba s Re v e n u e (4 ) Pr o Ba s e ßg (5 ) Pr o s e Ba s e Re v n u e li n e No An n u a l l. De o t i o n 1 A. C o m p a n y n e d , N o n - e t e r e d , M a i n t n a n c e 2 So i u m V a p o r 3 7D - W a l t 45 2 $8 . 7 1 $3 , 9 3 9 $1 0 . 3 4 $4 , 6 7 6 4 1O Q W a t t 17 6 . 8 0 $7 . 8 3 $1 , 3 8 4 , 4 1 6 $9 . 8 4 $1 , 7 3 9 , 8 0 5 20 W a t t 21 , 9 1 7 $9 . 1 7 $2 0 0 , 9 7 9 $1 3 . 3 0 $2 1 , 4 9 6 6 25 D - W a t t 1. 1 7 9 $1 0 . 3 7 $1 2 , 2 2 2 $1 4 . 5 1 $1 7 , 1 0 1 7 4O W a l t 81 4 $1 3 . 0 6 $1 0 , 6 2 5 $1 6 . 6 0 $1 3 . 5 0 5 8 To t a l S o d i u m V a p o r 20 1 , 1 7 0 $1 , 6 1 2 , 1 8 1 $2 , 0 6 . 5 8 9 No n - t e r e - V a n a b l E n e r g U s e 62 , 2 8 0 0. 0 6 2 9 0 $4 , 1 2 9 0. 0 6 7 0 $4 , 3 0 10 A - C o m n y - . N o n - M e r e d . M a i n t n a n c e $1 , 6 1 6 , 3 1 0 $2 , 0 7 0 . 8 8 . (6 ) (7 ) Re v e u e Pe r c n t Di f f e r e n C l ~ $7 3 7 18 . 7 1 % $3 5 5 , 3 8 25 . 6 7 % $9 0 , 5 1 7 45 . 0 4 % $4 , 8 7 9 39 . 9 2 % $2 , 8 8 0 27 . 1 1 % $4 5 4 , 3 9 9 28 . 1 9 % $1 7 3 4. 1 9 % $4 , 5 7 2 28 . 1 2 % . . Id a P o w e r C o m p a y Ca l c u l i o n o f R e v n u e I m p a St a t e o f I d l l o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t i o n F u n d i n g Ef c t i J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 Sc h e d u l e 4 1 . S t r e e L i g h t i n g S e r v ( c o n t d ) (1 ) (2 ) Cu r r n t BaBi (3 ) Cu r r n t Ba s e Re v e n u e (4 ) Pr o p o Ba s eBi (5 ) Pr o p o s Ba s e Re v e i i Li n e No An n u a l Ii De t i o n 1 B . C u a o m e r . ( n e d , N o n - M t e r e , M a i n t n a n c e 2 Me r c r y V a p o r 3 17 5 - W a t t 96 $6 . 4 3 $6 1 9 $4 . 0 7 $3 9 2 4 40 W a t t 70 10 . 1 6 $7 1 3 7. 8 8 $5 5 3 5 To t a l M e r c r y V a p o r 16 6 $1 , 3 3 2 $9 4 5 6 So d i u m V a p o r 7 7o - W a t t 60 3. 7 4 $2 2 5 2. 5 4 $1 5 3 8 1O D W a t t 12 9 , 4 6 2 4. 2 4 $5 8 , 9 1 8 2. 8 6 $3 7 0 , 2 6 0 9 20 W a t t 5, 2 1 8 5. 8 8 $3 0 , 6 8 4. 3 0 $2 2 , 4 3 9 10 25 0 W a t 41 , 9 4 7 6. 9 9 $2 9 , 2 1 0 5. 3 8 $2 2 5 , 6 7 5 11 40 W a t t 11 , 7 6 9 9. 7 2 $1 1 4 , 3 9 4 7. 7 6 $9 1 , 3 2 7 12 To t a l S o d i u m V a p o r 18 8 , 4 5 $9 8 7 , 4 3 1 $7 0 9 , 8 5 13 No n - M e t e - V a n a b l E n e r g y U s e 4, 1 2 8 0. 0 6 $2 7 4 0. 0 6 9 0 7 0 $2 8 5 14 B - C u s t o m r - O n e d , N o n - M e t e , M a i n t e a n c e $9 9 , 0 3 7 $7 1 1 , 0 8 15 8M - C u s t e r - O n e d , M e t e n i d , M a i n t e n a n c e 16 Me r c r y V a p r -; ; ( J t i 17 17 5 - W a t t 0 1. 9 6 $0 1. 2 2 $0 o. ~ ~ Òl ' V ) = r 18 40 W a t t 0 2. 0 3 $0 1. 2 3 $0 -. 0 ( b _ . 19 To t a l M e r c r y V a p o r 0 $0 $0 .. c : Z ~ - c : . . -~ ~ Z 20 So d i u m V a p r ." v . - 0 Il S . " . 21 7o - W a t 0 2. 5 3 $0 1. 2 8 $0 (J ~ ( J - 22 1O O - W a t t 0 2. 2 3 $0 1. 1 8 $0 (b " " 1 0 ~ t ; - 23 20 W a t t 0 2. 3 1 $0 1. 1 7 $0 Vo - 24 25 0 W a t t 19 2 2. 2 3 $4 2 9 1. 2 8 $2 4 6 - 0 i 25 40 W a t t 23 0 2. 2 9 $5 2 6 1. 2 8 $2 9 4 ~ OQ VI 26 To t a l L a m p C h a r g s 42 2 $9 5 5 $5 4 Vo "' f C O ~ 27 Me t e r C h a r g 11 2 8. 5 7 $9 6 3. 3 6 $3 7 6 l: = l l : : ii I I ¡ ; 28 En e r g y C h a r g .. ¡ z = CD 0 z 29 Pe r kW h 55 , 3 1 8 0. 0 5 9 3 8 5 $3 , 2 8 5 0. 0 4 1 6 0 $2 , 3 0 1 g, a : . ! ' 30 8M . C u s t o r - o e d , M e t e r e , M a i n t e n a n c e $5 , 2 0 0 $3 , 2 1 7 .. c n Ç l w .. g i~ .g g ~ . (6 ) (7 ) Re v e n u e pi f r e c e Pe r c n t~ ($ 2 2 7 ) ( 3 6 . 6 7 ) % ($ 1 6 0 ) ( 2 2 . 4 4 ) % ($ 3 7 ) ( 2 9 . 0 5 ) % ($ 7 ) ( 3 2 . 0 0 ) % ($ 1 7 8 , 6 5 8 ) ( 3 2 . 5 5 ) % ($ 8 , 2 4 5 ) ( 2 6 . 8 7 ) % ($ 6 7 , 5 3 5 ) ( 2 3 . 0 3 ) % ($ 2 3 , 0 6 V ( 2 0 . 1 6 ) % ($ 2 n , 5 7 7 ( 2 8 . 1 1 ) % $1 1 4 . 0 1 % ($ 2 n , 9 5 ) ( 2 8 . 1 0 ) % $0 0 . 0 0 $0 0 . 0 0 % $0 0 . 0 0 $0 0 . 0 0 % $0 0 . 0 0 % $0 0 . 0 0 % ($ 1 8 3 ) ( 4 2 . 6 6 ) % ($ 2 3 2 ) ( 4 4 . 1 1 ) % ($ 4 1 5 ) ( 4 3 . 4 6 ) % ($ 5 ) ( 6 0 . 8 3 ) % ($ 9 8 ) ( 2 9 . 9 5 ) % ($ 1 , 9 8 ) ( 3 8 . 1 3 ) % . .. : : ( J t T o. I : ; ) ôt " ' ' : : -. 0 ( l _ . :: g : z g : .. ~ ~ Z "i C Z - O i: i : " i . (K ~ r . . . (l - i I 0 .t t T . . .t ~ o . . .. I Vl O C W ;1 g i 0 l l co i l l = r CD I ¡ ; .. z ; : CO 0 z g, a : . t i ~i ~ w c , Jg ~ . St o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u i a l F u n d i n g Ef c t i v J a n u a r y 1 , 2 0 1 2 (1 ) Sc e d u l e 4 1 - S t r t L i g h t i n g S e r v c e ( c o n t ' d ) Li n e No De c r i D l i o n An n u a l I. (2 ) Cu r r n t Ba s e BI 1 C - C u s t o m e r - O n e , N o n r e , N o M a i n t n a n c e 2 E n e r g y C h a r g 3 P e r k W h 0 0 . 0 5 9 3 8 5 4 C - C u s t o m e - C n e d , N o n - M e t e r , N o M a i n t e n a n c e 5 C M - C u s t e r . ( n e d , M e n t d , N o M a n t e n a n c e 6 M e t e r C h a r g 1 , 9 6 7 E n e r g y C h a r g 8 P e r kW h 2, 6 8 3 , 6 8 2 0 . 0 5 9 3 9 C M - C u s t o r - C n e d , M e t e r e , N o M a i n t e a n c e (3 ) Cu r r t Ba s e Re v n u e 8. 5 7 $1 6 , 8 2 (4 ) Pr o p BaBi $0 0 . 0 4 1 6 0 $0 3. 3 6 $1 7 6 , 2 0 5 $1 5 9 , 3 8 2 0 . 0 4 1 6 0 (5 ) Pr o p o Ba s e Re v e n u e $6 , 5 9 6 $1 1 1 , 6 6 $1 1 8 , 2 5 6 (6 ) Re v e n u e Di f r e c e $0 $0 . (7 ) Pe r c n t~ $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % ($ 1 0 , 2 2 7 ) ( 6 0 . 7 9 ) % ($ 4 7 , 7 2 2 ) ( 2 9 . 9 4 ) % ($ 5 7 , 9 4 9 ) ( 3 2 . 8 9 ) % . II '¡'¡0)0) E ...... 0 0..~ II .. !Æ ~~ .... €IJi li li U)lŠU)....CI CI~ a: -131 l 8 0 c;~~~&la:gQ. ~l l~....l 0)0) fi.E ::~ .... Q, ! La .I:~hl g g E c 0 C'":!~~~.8 iii ~- .I --8 II Ilr'õl¡g ::'õl=-'51Q. c wi o u 0,g8wu uW ..i i:0.. ci c;~"0 "5 C)§;§! i-l ..l-..w g~u 0 M ~....I'r--~ ......'i_--M I I/CDflCIQ.::r:,§E Jii~ ()~šÒI!t!z l- eD :5 ~..I'M. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-1l-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 45 of 53 Exhibit No.3 Case No. IPC-E-11-D Settlemnt Stiulatn, IPC Page 20 of 24 . . . i !':. i ~ l.Ë :i~8!!~ ".U IiI l i ~ -a l~lll~l!i¡ ~l u ~ ~ ~lJi 1 :I .c ~ ri Ë Il ~ ~ ~ II ~ § __iil ~!e8.11 .- ct ai 0: fI i: ~ ~iJl ¡;Q. ~ ë II g §:li!~ ¡; ~ N~ IlI ¡;- ::ÆæI(. --:: o § l ~ ri.-N~ ~.- ~ ~ti co.-o ¡; ~"' ~g on"' cÐfI o 0o.-on g ~o ~~ ~.-~ i N.."' GO a 8as ¡ i ~i6~ ~ ~ ~ rD ¡; reo l8..Ø)(;o g o.. GO ~ ~ ~ l8.. rD ¡; ~o ~GO.-oo ~ ~ ~ I ~i:i:lII ~E i: ts ~i!~!~:i i::¡Æ :¡198iiii~ ~~i .-N CO v on Exhibit No. 101 Case No. ¡PC-E- 1 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 46 of 53 Exhibit No. 3 ca No. 1PC-11-Qa settnt Stipulatin, IPC Page 21 of 24 . ..~....t: )1 ..co co~0 ......s ..ci ... 8 i n)n)co..0 ..0 I"0 I" 21 ,.ö 0) ã~~n)..W!£!. §i m ~It It ..0"hi ai ö 0)ain)N l"n)~0 .... ~n)~~ e ai fl Q. n):8 co 0)i ..N .. ~N r.N..&ll!ci 0)..:: 11 0e ai ciQ. M Cl 0 0 co n)0)c ~fl l"N 0)=- a. :¡ ~Il ..N.i. e Co =-N ai 0 æ- ~ C\ l ll "i .1 ..gt ~81!¡~~w n);g~:i Æ fl. u !l_!o.(. a: 1;'& &i ii l =-i i~~co I"0llU)¡l N~ I! I"0)!~N iOa:ci ..J! G .. ~-i Cl ~ 2 ~ 8 ai 0 8 0 Il I"..~0 n) ~rr 18I"..l N I":S g.. I ~"ti:II E i! ~:2 II:i ~ fI ~ i:fI ~tí ~"t !i:~g b 11 ei li: ~l ~0(.w .. ~~i N n)..It. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-I 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/1 1 Page 47 of 53 Exhibit No.3 Case No. IPCE-11-0 Settnt Stipulatn, IPC Page 22 of 24 . . . I ~N (:i § iii;!j¡": g ll¡ ¡.. . - - :I i~ilijlll~ß· - ø ii3!il "w11 ..(J ~ f if ~ 'õ .!.. ::C) i~ E j i 5 If ëŠ ..!e ~ ~I ~ c: _~ .,!.- ~.. .e fi.. .e ~N ~..., ~ ã ~ ~ æo .. ....1311 ~ ~ ~ ~lÆl ~ :; lì "2 lì lì .. ll 31 ~ &i è!oN:! ~Æ ~Q. 0 ~ êli 1 ~ (J l :g ..~ai~ &i ~8Æ~ ....~ ~- ~~ ~ lg :; ~ æi-., r-CD lñ..oo §8..iñ~ I G);::: ei c: "0 l!Jc:wialŠ Š~~ ~~N M Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-II-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 48 of 53 Exibit NO.3 case No. 1PC-11-0 selent Stiulatin, IPC Pae 23 of 24 .. : : ( ' t T e. i i ; ' o t " t i : : -. 0 ( l _ . :: g : Z g : .. ~ ? Z "' C / - O ii S " " ' . (J " ' ( ' . . (l ~ 1 0 .¡ t T . . \0 ; . o . . .. I VI 0 0 W "' ~ o ~ l i i g N3 Z = .i ~ 0 z g, a . : . p N ( I " ' ~ .i . g n 5. i ; l : : ~ I i ~ . Li n e D e o t i o n ~1 F i r s B l o c k C o n t r a c t D e m a n d 2 F i r s t B l o c k E n e r g y 3 S e c o n d B l o c C o n t r c t D e a n d 4 s e c o n d B l o c E n e r g y Ad d i t i o n a l M i n . E n e r g y R e v e n u e 6 E x æ D e a n d C h a r g e s 7 D a i l y E x c e D e m a n d 8 M o n t h l y e x c e s s D e m a n d 9 E x E n e r g y C h a r 10 T o t a l R e v e n u e - B l o c k 1 11 T o t l R e v n u e - B l o c 2 12 T o t l R e v n u e . . Id a h o P o C o p a n y Ca l c u l a t n o f R e v e n u e I m p a St a o f I d a h o 20 1 1 G R C S t i p u l a t i o n F u n d i n g Ef f J a n u a r 1 , 2 0 1 2 Ho u Sc h e d u l e 32 (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) Cu r r n t Cu r r n t Pr o p o s e d Pr o p o s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Ba s e Re v e n u e Pe r c n t l, ~ Re v e n u e 8m Re v e n u e Di f r e n c e Qi 59 1 , 3 8 7 $2 . 3 5 $1 , 3 8 9 , 7 6 0 $2 . 3 5 $1 , 3 8 9 , 7 6 0 $0 0. 0 0 % 37 0 , 0 0 6 , 2 1 9 0. 0 6 1 6 6 $2 2 , 8 1 4 , 5 8 3 0. 0 6 1 6 6 0 $2 2 , 8 1 4 , 5 8 3 $0 0. 0 0 % 30 , 0 0 $4 . 6 3 $1 , 3 8 9 , 0 0 $4 . 8 2 $1 , 4 4 , 0 0 0 $5 7 , 0 0 4. 1 0 % 19 7 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0. 0 2 8 8 9 4 $5 , 6 9 5 , 0 0 7 0. 0 3 0 1 1 0 $5 , 9 3 4 , 6 8 1 $2 3 9 , 6 7 4 4. 2 1 % 0 $0 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 $0 . 5 7 $0 $0 . 5 9 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 $5 . 7 1 $0 $5 . 9 5 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % 0 0. 0 8 8 7 $0 0. 0 9 2 3 6 1 $0 $0 0. 0 0 % $2 4 , 2 0 4 , 3 4 3 $2 4 , 2 0 4 , 3 4 3 $0 0. 0 0 % $7 , 0 8 , 0 0 7 $7 , 3 8 0 , 6 8 1 $2 9 6 , 6 7 4 4. 1 9 % $3 1 , 2 8 8 , 3 5 0 $3 1 , 5 8 5 , 0 2 4 $2 9 6 , 6 7 4 0. 9 5 % . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTiliTIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E.11.08 IDAHO POWER COMPANY . EXHIBIT NO.4. Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page50of53 .Q) E an 8 C'co.s ,... C'u.an C'.m C'~:5 LlB rs :iC/ Q)..:i C'lls Ie0 15 oiwZ:l co.... ãi I Ñ oi Õ C/..~....clëc Q)I c N -a E .. i c I i i C' l!l.9 ~8 :8:i c d1 ~M -,.,!f 0 ~! ~ d1 !.... a:ë !K C'&l N!ia:i: ë ~11 eQ)Q)w )0 i a: ~~êli:ëi ~~z !J l u 0 !&:ac( ;¡u Q)C/iô Q)0. c( i:E =i8 ll :i 0 Q)~ & æ ~:!C'C's....c .,~!s ..o c _ i: ;.¡ ~a:-Q)O.w&:-i:a:oil!..t"J...~ 'U to !.. E an an as ~ 0. .9 c?...... .0 ~:i 8 o Ii :t 1i ¡ .. .c0.. i a:~ ..-m ~,.J! ~ ~~ ~ .m :i i .. e I Q)~ ..an .".s - K ~.a · ~Do If c(:i :io ~_ ¡ c- ei ! ~~ Q).s C) ! ! i5 E ..11 ~ .õ ..:i t:." ..!~¡ ~ = 11i:ia .a; êl0c(~J C) l ..o ;,..&: 0 Q)oi co N ~as Q) Cl~K :5 S Q)u c(Ii õ ~ i: C .co~ _ -¡ 8. ~II ..C 15 as Q) :i0.c &: .¥ tš ."tš ."." to 0ælC s s .:i:i .! l 0 IIu. Q)~~~C a:ji.9 :& "! E!ei~ ~ co ~II !; !! II .. C'~w iw Il!!!! C)=::_~~~'Uc;~~~ ~~t~~~~:i :i I~~~~~ 0 0C/C/-NC'..an."" "- .. "" .. exhibit No.4 Case NO.IPCE-11.( Exhibit No. 101 Setnt Stiule, IPC Case No. IPC-E- 1 1-8 Page 1 of3 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 51 of 53 . . . c!c~II CS t 1 cc .t~.a ..z! "oC;; .Q; c l ~ 8. ~u C = ëiix!...w u.a C l" ~ Wl! B so.. I:: '5 = a -. ~- i .E E 8' 0_ u.. C)0 - ! '5 g I w o 12 .! ..aJ N IX (l l i3i- " CD.!c:ãi ~ liix CD.J(. a:~Cl/.~!~&l~~~ § x if II W ID ~ 8 Ø)C Na; i; ..Š i- IIU) (l i ai c( i! )( ClCD aJ N i i- ..u. ~ . li 8 ~~ .s i3 i ~.. g §iñ~Ñ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~..fI ..oCl m.... l"§ .! u. l l5 ~ '! ~.. CD c: c:CD W~ ~ J3 Exhibit No. 101 Case No. IPC-E-l 1-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10107/11 Page52of53 Exhibit No. 4 case No. IPC-E-11-0 Settlent Stiulation, IPC Page2of3 . o co.- cO.-~ ~ ti ias '" :: as igl; .9 'i (' I .-ig1I- ~..a:,. l! ~~Ñ..- 0 NClIñ C COII~.- :8 iñ .li .. ~ l!.. ~! c 0:; !-e:¡ ~N'" ÆIi c llo II -(, ~= Ë Cø:! i.0.W u i!:i l! II~'"~s II :;::Do ~ Ii C c-..II II C e5 llCl ¡; ~..0_"i 0 ma .e c('" a: ~ .1:S c'-.-e i IL .! g :;l mEII 't II 'f c a:~Na.~æ ~ i IIc:W C.2gj:I asu. 15 c: a:o i:i ~l! ~ II c:liw Cl ~:I0U) . Exhibit No. 101 Case No. ¡PC-E- 11-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07/11 Page 53 of 53 Exhibit No.4 Cas No. IPC-E-11-DSetnt Stipultin, IPC Page3of3 . . . coU) c'¡: 0 ~C' .- "" Co ñi '"E :; ":o Co w0'- i C) èñ ~c" -:. c o.= CDm E Z :-.! CI- = U) ;; CI C'c en 0o:: r- Q)3"0 Q).co(J ~.~ Q)(J ~ Q)c: Q)(! eÜ E(J §: cu+o UC Ccu ~VI i: .. cu ~~ Q. i5 ~ N.-l ~oU..+o~ oW ~ ~.. ~ :: cuu ex "' cu~ :: l! c:: CUQ. ;:.'¡ CU VI ex E ~ CU+o UC CCU ~i:CU ~a. i5.. CU "t E CU CU E !i ~ :: :: CU '1 Q. ~ g ~ ex Z -~ ~ +o CUc ::~ c .. CU :: ;:U & -!2 CU+o UC CCU ~i:CU ~Q. i5 Ñ-.. ~ CUø +o :: E .! C:: CUE Q. ~ ~ ~ ex ;: +o CUC ::~ C .. ~ :: CUu ex 6" ..i ~ ~C ~w § ~I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N VI ~ N VI e N VI N .- N e ~ N ~ .. .- VI ~ .-~ ~ .. e ~ ~ ~ N .- a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI ~ m N N~ ~ VI ~ m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N ~ VI N~ ~ em .- Ó.- N m ~Oe~m~""VI~~.-m~~.-m~OÓOÓ""I.VlVlO~meVl~~oo~.- ~ mII ~m N.- N.- .- ~.-.-.-NNNamVl~~rr~N.-~m~N:-meoom~~_.-.-.-NNme ~~~~~S~~~~~~ú1rñ~~N ó oó ,. ~ I. VI ~ m N ,. Ó ~ oó ~ N.- N N m e VI ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 .- .- N m 00.- .- .- .- .- .- .-O~~N II 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N N m e ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00 ~ ~ VI N ~ .- .- ~ m m e ~ .- ~ ~ VI ~ ~ .-e ~ .- m ~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ rr .- a ~ 00 ~~ ~ VI ~ m m m m N N N N N N N N N .- ,. .- ~ VI N~ ~ em .- Ó.- N m e~~ONe~~ONe~~VlVlVlerr N .- .- 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI ~ a ~ ~ e ~~ oó ~ I. ~ m N .- Ó ~ oó ~ N I. .- Ó ~meVl~~oo~S~~~~~~~~~ .- N N 0 ~ ~ VI m .. ~ ~ VI m .- 0 0 .-m ~ ~ ~ e N 0 ~ ~ m .- ~ ~ II m N .- N Ó oó ,. I. VI ~ N .- Ó ~ ~ I. VI ~ oó N.- N N m e VI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .- N m ~ N.- .- .- .- .- N .. N mo ~ ~I. m .- ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- 0 N VI 0 VI .- ~ VI VI ~ VI 0 ~~ e .- ~ m .- 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI VI ~ rr rr rr ~~ I. VI ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m m m m m m m m m m ~ VI N m m m e e e e VI VI VI ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 m ~~ ~ e ~ ~ a N ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~m .- Ó Ó Ó .- .- .- .- .- N N N N N m ~ VI ~ ~.- N m e VI ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 .- N m e VI 0 VI 0 0 0.- .- .- .- .- .- N N m e VI .- N N .- 0 0 ~ 00 ~ ~ VI e m N N ~ m ~ ~ 0m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e m N .- 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ a II ~ 00 ~ N Ó oó 00 oó 00 oó oó oó oó oó ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI ~ m.- N N m e VI ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 .- N m e ~ e ~ ~ ~.- .- .- .- .- .- N N m e 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 08 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8808 8.-NmeVl~~~~ .-Nm~VlOVlO 0.-' ,. .-' .-' .-' .-' N' N' l' e' iñ .- N m e VI ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 .- N m e VI ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- N Exhibit No. i 02 Case No. IPC-E- i i-8 R. Lobb, Staff 10/07 II i Page i of 2 EXHIBIT . . . Mo n t h l y B i l i n g C o m p a r i s o n Se t t l e m e n t S t i p u l a t i o n Ca s e N o . I P C - E - 1 1 - 0 8 Re s i d e n t i a l S e r v i c e , S c h e d u l e 1 (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) (8 ) (9 ) Su m m e r No n - S u m m e r Av g M t h C o s t - 1 2 M t h s Li n e En e r g y Cu r r e n t St i p u l a t e d Pe r c e n t Cu r r e n t St i p u l a t e d Pe r c e n t Cu r r e n t St i p u l a t e d Pe r c e n t No kW h Re v e n u e Re v e n u e Di f f e r e n c e Re v e n u e Re v e n u e D i f f e r e n c e Re v e n u e Re v e n u e Di f f e r e n c e 1 0 4. 0 0 5. 0 0 25 . 0 0 % 4. 0 0 5. 0 0 25 . 0 0 % 4. 0 0 5. 0 0 25 . 0 0 % 2 10 0 11 . 1 0 12 . 3 9 11 . 6 2 % 10 . 6 3 11 . 8 3 11 . 2 9 % 10 . 7 5 11 . 9 7 11 . 3 5 % 3 20 0 18 . 2 1 19 . 7 9 8. 6 8 % 17 . 2 5 18 . 6 6 8. 1 7 % 17 . 4 9 18 . 9 4 8. 2 9 % 4 30 0 25 . 3 1 27 . 1 8 7. 3 9 % 23 . 8 8 25 . 4 9 6. 7 4 % 24 . 2 4 25 . 9 1 6. 8 9 % 5 40 0 32 . 4 1 34 . 5 8 6. 7 0 % 30 . 5 0 32 . 3 2 5. 9 7 % 30 . 9 8 32 . 8 9 6. 1 7 % 6 50 0 39 . 5 1 41 . 9 7 6. 2 3 % 37 . 1 3 39 . 1 5 5. 4 4 % 37 . 7 3 39 . 8 6 5. 6 5 % 7 60 0 46 . 6 2 49 . 3 6 5. 8 8 % 43 . 7 6 45 . 9 8 5. 0 7 % 44 . 4 8 46 . 8 3 5. 2 8 % 8 70 0 53 . 7 2 56 . 7 6 5. 6 6 % 50 . 3 8 52 . 8 1 4. 8 2 % 51 . 2 2 53 . 8 0 5. 0 4 % 9 80 0 60 . 8 2 64 . 1 5 5. 4 8 % 57 . 0 1 59 . 6 4 4. 6 1 % 57 . 9 6 60 . 7 7 4. 8 5 % 10 90 0 69 . 4 7 73 . 1 6 5. 3 1 % 64 . 3 7 67 . 2 3 4. 4 4 % 65 . 6 5 68 . 7 1 4. 6 6 % -; : ( J t ' 11 1, 0 0 0 78 . 1 3 82 . 1 7 5. 1 7 % 71 . 7 3 74 . 8 2 4. 3 1 % 73 . 3 3 76 . 6 6 4. 5 4 % o. ~ ; . Ô t " ~ = : 12 1, 0 5 0 82 . 4 5 86 . 6 7 5. 1 2 % 75 . 4 2 78 . 6 1 4. 2 3 % 77 . 1 8 80 . 6 3 4. 4 7 % -: 0 a - -- a - Z _ . :: s r ~ Z 13 1, 1 0 0 86 . 7 8 91 . 1 7 5. 0 6 % 79 . 1 0 82 . 4 1 4. 1 8 % 81 . 0 2 84 . 6 0 4. 4 2 % ", V l - O 14 1, 2 0 0 95 . 4 3 10 0 . 1 8 4. 9 8 % 86 . 4 6 89 . 9 9 4. 0 8 % 88 . 7 0 92 . 5 4 4. 3 3 % ~ 6 t ' " . OC ' " ( 1 - ai " " i 0 15 1, 3 0 0 10 4 . 0 9 10 9 . 1 9 4. 9 0 % 93 . 8 2 97 . 5 8 4. 0 1 % 96 . 3 9 10 0 . 4 8 4. 2 4 % IV c ; I V 0 - 16 1, 4 0 0 11 2 . 7 4 11 8 . 2 0 4. 8 4 % 10 1 . 1 8 10 5 . 1 7 3. 9 4 % 10 4 . 0 7 10 8 . 4 3 4. 1 9 % - .. i IV CX 17 1, 5 0 0 12 1 . 3 9 12 7 . 2 1 4. 7 9 % 10 8 . 5 4 11 2 . 7 6 3. 8 9 % 11 1 . 7 5 11 6 . 3 7 4. 1 4 % 18 2, 0 0 0 16 4 . 6 6 17 2 . 2 5 4. 6 1 % 14 5 . 3 6 15 0 . 7 0 3. 6 7 % 15 0 . 1 9 15 6 . 0 9 3. 9 3 % 19 2, 5 0 0 21 6 . 5 8 22 6 . 3 0 4. 4 9 % 18 7 . 6 9 19 3 . 0 3 2. 8 5 % 19 4 . 9 1 20 1 . 3 5 3. 3 0 % 20 3, 0 0 0 26 8 . 5 0 28 0 . 3 5 4. 4 1 % 23 0 . 0 2 23 5 . 3 6 2. 3 2 % 23 9 . 6 4 24 6 . 6 1 2. 9 1 % 21 4, 0 0 0 37 2 . 3 3 38 8 . 4 5 4. 3 3 % 31 4 . 6 8 32 0 . 0 2 1. 7 0 % 32 9 . 0 9 33 7 . 1 3 2. 4 4 % 22 5, 0 0 0 47 6 . 1 7 49 6 . 5 4 4. 2 8 % 39 9 . 3 5 40 4 . 6 9 1. 3 4 % 41 8 . 5 6 42 7 . 6 5 2. 1 7 % . N LI 0"""* N i.LI LI N N "* N i.LI 'I LI u1 N'('' ('0 0 'I N a\N 0 LI LI'0' 00 O" i.O"LI 0' 'I' N .-.-0 0 'I .-'LI' 0 ('00'0' 00 i. .-.-'I'i.'"('00 .- QJ::c: ~;: QJ c: 0:ci ëa. QJ E E 00 .l~o 2 iQ. ~o ~ ~ Vl"C -c c:ci E ~ QJ::c: QJ~QJ0:2LIoo..ci"Co.-oN. .- ci~ .9-..LI -LI'INN(' Òz~ QJ "Eo- LUVIQ.Z c: "C QJ "C::Uc: ..QJII .' ~o..~::ti Q)a: IIciII Q);:.'¡ c: Q)uc: ;:uc: Q).üæ LU Eo..II::UIIII~ II..c: Q) E;:ciQ. QJ.~..c: Q)uc: Q)IIc:oa.II Q)0: "Cc:ci E Q)o IIII Q).. N (' ~ .EII"Cc:::LI 2VIo Q):e~ci ~o.-oN 'I ~ II('iNi.- II E ~ ëQ.ti .= .=ci E Q)0: -a..'¡ LI~ Q)a. Q)::c: Q);: Q)a: "C Q).!: ci E~oZ~ QJ....ci QJS.-.-oN LI i. " ~ QJ :E0::i.C ~2LIo "C QJIIoa.o~Q. -" IIi.*LI- QJ::c: Q);: Q)a:~ Q)'" ëi:i.C ~2VIoo..ci'" '" Q).!: ci E~oz õõ II'Ii" ~ Q)~ Q)o.-oN~ QJ~otic: '"c:::LI cic:o :-e'"'"c: 00 ãì II ~ II Eci~tio~Q.ti.= .=ci E Q)a:~ .E QJ::c: Q)~Q)a:~ Q) :E0::i.C ~2VIo c: QJIIci Q)~uc: QJtici..c: QJu~ Q)Q. O" EXHIBIT £)3 Exhibit No. 103 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 D. English, Staff 10/07111 ,,'. . . "¡ About I Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho (CAPAII - Mozila Firefox . Eile ~dit ~iew Hi~tory ~ookmarlc lools t!eI CJ:,="~~ C W U.;t~t~Pj~~:~~~~~~:ill~l'~~~.. i~;t'.:o~~~:~Cli~O li Most Vied 'Getting Staed ci About I Comminly Aitin Parts... South Eastern Coiimuiiitv Actíon Paitnership FeillowUs641 N. 8th Avenue, Pocatello,ldaho 83201 Serving: Bannock. Bear lake. Bingham, C.lfiboii. Franklin. Oneida, and Power Counties I:I Thf' homisf' (If C\'llHlHiiit-r AliIiD 1~ Community Action changes people's iives, embodies the spirit of hope, improves communities and makes America a better place to live. We care about the entire community, and we are dedica1ed to helping people help themselves and each other. Ni"rs +-1 Idaho and the Food Stamp Program on NBC's Nightlv News - 9 pm (MST) Community Council ofldaho's Ribbon Cutting Ceremonv SCCAP Featured in Home Energv Magazine Eastern Idaho Community Action Partnership Receives Major Gift 2011 Weatherization Day Proclamation \ n.n-"n.iu-n¡ -1';\.'Do : 'J: -staÌ1 i Inbox' Microsoft Out." II FINAL DRAFT. Re~ie". . ¡ AbolJ I COfI~lunlt1 A.. '(,il I ¡¡ i EXHIBIT õ'- Exhbit No. 104 Case No. IPC-E-11-8 12/05/11 Page 1 of 3 . . . :', About I Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho (CAPAII- Mozílla Firefox I. I Ede i¡dl !£w Hior 0."""""'-.'_.!'iii..' C ll00arks 10015 tilp ûJ ¡LL~~~~~.:~~~~~eitÍ(n,~~_utJ~EI~__ i; Most Vied . Getting stared i& Lates Heads r15.~1£~;;;~';;~~:131::.:'.'.....~:=~"_.~"__,~._.,.~____..___,_ ._~-~--._-,.-OC",.. Eastern Idaho Special Services Agency P.O. Box 51098, 357 Const~utionWay, Idaho Fans, Idaho 83402 ~2 ~2 /1:. communly actÏ?_id~ , ..:.'..¡.tipí¡'r.d~r..:"...:"."..-=.,-....'..:, :f '....""..,-..""=.-...... i Find Local Off Foilow Us-I). The Promise of Community l\:~tlcn Communiy .Ilctn changes people's lives, embodies the spirU of hope, improves commuUies and makes America a beler Piace to Ove. We care about the entire communiy, and we are dediated to helping people help themselves and each other. i.ie"v:'~ Idaho and the Food stamp Program on NBC's Nighty News - 9 pm (MST) CommunUy Councn of Idaho's Ribbon CUling Ceremoy SCCAP Featured in Home Energy Magazine Eastern Idaho Communfty Action Parnership Receives Major Gift 2011 Weatherization Day Proclaation Ariri(I'Jricerúents Idaho and the Food Stamp Program on NBC's Nihtly News - 9 pm (MST) Do ,; start 11 Inbo" - r'1IcrO,üfr Out" 'Abour i ':On1n1Unlr, A t¡ DoclJrnentl . r11crosof " "( l IIr¡ 11 Exhbit No. 104 Case No. IPC-E-1l-8 12/05/11 Page 2 of3 .' . . . .P IPUC Annual Report 2010 SERVICE AREAS OF INVESTOR OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITIES IN IDAHO _ Avista Utilties _ Idaho Power Utah Power 451 Page Exhbit No. 104 Case No. IPC..E..11..8 12/05/11 Page 3 of3 . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMSSION . CASE NO. IPC-E-ll-08 INDUSTRI CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXHIBIT NO. 301 Dr. Don Reading's Curriculum Vitae. EXHIBIT . Prese n I po.rtio n Educ alion Honors and awards Profs uio naJ and business hislory . Expe rie n ce . Don C. Reading Don C. Reading Vice Preside nt and Consulting Ec onom ist B.S., Economics - Utah State University M.S., Economics - University of Oregon Ph.D., Economics - Utah State University Omicron Delta Epsilon, NSF Felowship Ben Johnson Associates, Inc.:1989 Vice President 1986 ---- Con suiting Econ omist Idaho Public Utilites Commission: 1981-86 Economist/Director of Poliy and Administration Teaching: 1980-81 Associate Professor, University ofHawai-Hilo 1970-80 Associate and Assistant Professor, Id aho State University 1968-70 Assistant Professor, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Reading provides expert testimony concerning economic and regulatory issues. He has testified on more than 35 occasions before utity regulatory commissions in Alaska, California, Colorado, the District of Co lumbia, Hawai, Idaho, Nevada, North Dakota, Texas, Utah, Wyoming, and Washington. Dr. Reading has more than 30 years experience in the field of economics. He has participated in the development of indices reflecting economic trends, GNP growt rates, foreign exchange markets, the money supply, stock market levels, and inflation. He has analyzed such public policy issues as the minimum wage, federal spending and taxation, and import/ export balances. Dr. Reading is one of four economists providing yearly forecasts of statewide personal income to the State of Idaho fo r purposes 0 f establishing state per sonal incom e tax rates. In the field of telecommunications, Dr. Reading has provided expert testimony on the issues of maxginal cost, price elasticity, and measured service. Dr. Reading prepared a state-specific study of the price elastcity of demand for local telephone service in Idaho and recentl conducted research for, and directed the preparatin of, a repor to the Idaho legislature regarding the status of telecommunicatins competition in that state. . Exhibit No. 301 IPC-E-ii-oS Reading, ICIP Page 1 Don C. Reading . Dr. Readings areas of expertse in the field of electric power inchide demand forecasting, long-range planing, price elasticity, marginal and average cost pricing, production-simultion modeling, and econometric modeling. Among his recent cases was an electric rate design analysis for the Industral Customers of Idaho Power. Dr. Reading is currently a consultant to the Idaho Legislatue's Committee on Electric Restructuring. Since 1999 Dr. Reading has been affilted with the Climate Impact Group (CIG) at the University of Washingtn. His WOi: with the CIG has involved an analysis of the impact of Global Warming on the hydo facities on the Snake River. It also includes an investigation into water markets in the Northwest and Florida. In addition he has analyzed the economics of snowmaking fOr ski area's impacted by Global Warming. Among Dr. Readings recent projects are a FERC hydropower relicensing study (for the Skokomish Indian Tribe) and an analysis of Northern States Power's Nort Dakota rate design proposals aff.cting large industria customers (fOr J .R. Simplot Company). Dr. Reading has also perormed analysis for the Idaho Governor's Office 0 f the impa ct on the Nortwest Po wer Gr id of various plans to increase salmon runs in the Columbia Rier Basin. Dr. Reading has prepared econometric forecast for the Southeast Idaho Counci of Governments and the Revenue Projection Committee of the Idaho Stare Legislatue. He has also been a member of several Northwest Power Planning Council Statistical Advisory Committees and was vice chairman of the Governor's Economic Research Council in Idaho . While at Idaho State University, Dr. Reading performed demographic studies using a cohort/ survval model and several economic impact studies using input/ output analysis. He has also provided expert testmony in cases concerning loss of income resulting from wrongful death, injur, or employment discriination. He is currently a adjunct professor of economics at Boise State University (Idaho economic history, urban/regional economics and labor economic.) Dr. Readg has recendy completed a public interest water rights trnsfer case. He is currently a member of the Boise City Public Works Commssion. Exhibit No. 301 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 2 . . .. . PubJications . . Don C. Reading "Energizing Idaho", Idaho Issues Online, Boise Stite Universit, Fall 2006. ww.boisestate.edu/history/issuesonline/fa1l2006_issues/index.htm 1 The Economic Impact of the 2001 Salmon Season In Idaho, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Foundation, April 2003. The Economic Impact of a Restored Salmon Fishery in Idaho, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Aprii 1999. The &0 nom ic 1m pact 0 f Ste elhea d Fish ing and the R etum of Sa ImoD Fishing in Idaho, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Foundation, September, 1997. "Cost Savings from Nuclear Resources Reform: An Econometric Model. (with E. Ray Can terbery and Ben J olinson) Southern Economic journaJ, Spring 1996. A Visitor Anaysis for a Birds of Prey Public Attraction, Peregrne Fu nd, Inc., November, 1988. Investigation of a Capitalization Rate for Idaho Hydroelectrc Projects, Idaho State Tax Commission, June, 1988. "Post-PURPA Views," In Proceedings of the N ARUC Biennial Regulatory Conference, 1983. An Input-Output Analysis of the Impact from Proposed Mining in the Challs Area (with R. Davies). Public Policy Research C enter, Idaho State University, February 1980. Phophfl/e and Soiitheast: AS ocio Economic Analsis (with J. Eyre, etal). Government Research Institute of Idaho State University and the Southeast Idaho Council ofGovernments, August 1975. Estimfltig GeneraJ Fund Revenues of the State ofIdflho (with S. Ghazanfar and D. Holley). Center for Business and Economic Research, Boise State Universit, June 1975. "A Note on the Distribution of Federal Expenditures: An Interstate Comparison, 1933-1939 and 1961-1965." In The American Economist, Vol. XVII, No.2 (Fall 1974), pp. 125-128. "New Deal Actiity and the States, 1933-1939." In JournaJ of Economic History, VoL. XXXII, December 1973, pp. 792-810. Exhibit No. 301 IPC-E-l i-os Reading, ICIP Page 3 . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-I1-08 INDUSTRIL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXHBIT NO. 302 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request No. 28 Regarding Idaho Power's Authorized Rates of Return Since 1987 EXHIBIT 'N.~lQ..p .. .... . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 28: Reference Direct Testimony of Scott Spars, p. 41, lines 1-3 (stating that the primary cost component that has driven the reuction in the facilities charge rates is the Rate of Return, which has decreased since the last update). (a) Please admit or deny that the Rate of Return used in the 1987 calculation for Scheule 19 was 9.952%. If deny, please identi the Rate of Return used in 1987. (b) Please identif the Commission case number for all general rate cases filed by Idaho Power since 1987, and the Company's autrized Rate of Return in each of those cases. (e) Please admit or deny that the Rate of Return autorized in 2005 (IPC-E- 05-28),2007 (IPC-E-07-DS), 2008 (lpc-e-oS-10), was less than the Rate of Return used to calculate the facilties charge since 1987. If deny, please explain. (d) Please explain why the Company has not updated the facilities charge since 1987 in light of the decrase in Rate of Return occurrng at the time of general rate case filings listed in (c). Has the Company been overcharging for the facilities charge by failng to update the charge prior to now? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 28: (a) The rate of return use in the 1987 calculation for Schedule 19 was 9.902 percnt, which corresponds to a levelized rate of return of 6.905 percent. In comparison, the 2010 rate of return used in the proposed facilties charg calculation is 8.013 percent which corrsponds to a levelized rate of return of 4.81 percnt; as shown on page 40 ofthe Dire Testimony of Mr. Sparks. IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAl CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POER - 31 Exhibit No. 302 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP Page 1 (b) The Commission case numbers for all general rate cases fied by Idaho Power since 1987 and the Company's authorized rates of retum in each of those cases are shown in the table below. General Rate Rate of Case Year Filed case Number Return 1994 IPC-E-94-5 9.199% 2003 IPC-E-Q3-13 7.852% 2005 IPC-E-Q5-28 8.1% 2007 IPC-E-Q7 -08 8.1% 2008 IPC-E-08-10 8.18% (c) Please see the Company's responses to (a) and (b) above. (d) The Company has not updated the facilities charges since 1987 because its penodic validatins of the existing facilites charges did not warrant an update when using the currnt approved calculation methdology. The response to this Request was prepare by SCtt D. Sparks. Senior Regulatory Analyst. Idaho Power Company, in consulttion with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporae Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 32 Exhibit No. 302 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 2 , . - . . . . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-I1-08 INDUSTRI CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXHIBIT NO. 303 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request Nos. 6, 7, 46, and 47 Regarding Idaho Power's Facilities Charge "Credit" EXHIBIT ¡¡.3! ~ TlJ . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIN NO.6: Reference Dire Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 41 (stating that the estimated reduction in revenue received by the Company through the facilties charge "wil result in increases in the revenue requirements for each customer class that collect facilits charge revenue"). (a) Please admit or deny that the Company's filing submits tha a fair, just and reasonable facilites charge for Schedule 9, 19, and 24 customers would be 1.41% monthly, which is a reucion from the charge currently in effec of 1.7 % monthly. If deny, please explain. (b) Please admit or deny that the Company's filing submits that the reuction in revenue collected from customer classes attbutble to the proposed reductn in the facilti charge should result in a corrsponding increase in revenue reuirement for those cusomer classes. If deny, plese explain. (c) If the response to the (a) and (b) is to admit, please explain the Company's justification. Speically, please fully explain why a reuction in Company's rate of return since 1987 (or any other reducton in any other component of the facilites charge) and a corrsponding need to reuce the facilities charge should be couple wih a corrponding Increase the revenue requirement for thes customer classes. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIN NO.6: (a) The Company's filing submits that a monthly facilties charge rate of 1.41 percent is a fair, just, and reasonable facilites charg for Schedule 9, 19, and 24 customers. (b) A reuction in revenue collected frm customer classs attbutable to the proposed reuction in the facilities charges will result in a corrnding incrase in revenue requirement for those customer classes. IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR 'PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 4 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 1 . (c) Revenue received frm customers paying facilities charges is directy related to the Company's cost of owing, operating, and maintaining facilities that are solely dedicated to these customers. As a result, the revenue received frm these customers is applied as a dire offet or creit to the revenue reuirement for the corresponding customer class. Because these facilities are only used by customers subject to facilties charges, it is reasonable to offset the respective customer classes' revenue requirement. Therefore, a reduction in the revenue crit assated with facilties charges result in a corrsponding increase in the revenue reuirement. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consulttion wih Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company.. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 5 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 2 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.7: Reference Dire Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 41 (stting that the estimate reduction in revenue reived by the Company through the facilites charge "will result in increases in the revenue reuirements for each customer class that collecs facilities charge revenue"). (a) Does the Company believe that it is entitled to remain revenue neutrl with reard to any changes in the faciltie charge calculated in 1987? Does the Company consider th level of facilities charge set for Schedule 19 customers in 1987 in Case No. U-1006298 to be a "grandfathere" rate to which it is entitled into perpetuity If not, please explain. (b) Please identif any other rate revery mechanism authorize by the Commisson which allows the Company to increase a customer class's revenue requirement solely to keep the Company revenue neutl when it is fair, just and resonable to reuce some component of that customer class's rates. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.7: (a) As wi all rates, charges, and creits in Idaho Power's tariff, the Company files to update costs peridically in order to keep all rates, charges, and creit currnt wit the actal cost incurrd by the Company. In the Company's revenue requirement calculation for the determination of base rates, facilities charges are treated as a revenue credit. Thereore, a reucton in the revenue creit results in an increse in the revenue require from base rates. The Company believes this is the appropriate manner in which to determlne its revenue requirement regardless of the year in which the currntly effve facilties charge rate was determined. The Company does not consider the level of facilties charge set for Scheule 19 custmers in 1987 in Case No. IDAO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER _ 6 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 3 . U-1006-298 to be a "grandfathere" rate to which it is entiled into perpetuity. This is evidence by the Company's current request to adjust the facilties charge rae. The Company believes that it should have an opportnity to recver it prudently incurrd cost and earn it authorized rate of return. This is tru whether th assciate revenue comes from facilites charges or base ras. (b) All of the Company's revenue for "non-rurrng charges" such as connecion and disconnection charges as well as field visit charges and servce establishment charges are treate in the same manner as facilities charges in the Company's revenue requirement determination for each class. That is, as revenues frm non-reurrng charges move up or down reuftng frm changes in the charge amounts without a corresponding change in costs, the revenue requird from base rates is naturally adjusted accordingly. Furter, under the Company's Rule H, New Servce Attachments and Distribution Line Installations or Alteratins, revenue colleced from contributions in aid of constrcton ("CIAC") are booked as a direct offset to the . corresponding customer classs' revenue reuirement. As a result, if the Company's collecion of CIAC's is reduce for a partcular customer class, thn the classes' revenue requirement wil increase as a result. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Spark, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporae Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 7 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 4 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 46: In respnse to ICIP's Request for Production NO.6 (c) the Company stated, "Revenue received from customers paying facilities charges is directly related to the Company's cost of owning, operating, and maintaining facilities that are solely dedicated to these customers." Plese explain why a decrease in the cost of owning, operating, and maintining facilties should cause the rates for the customer class to increase. Does Idaho Power agre that this is counterintuitive to basic ratemaking principles? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 46: The cost of owning, operating, and maintaining all Idaho Power facilities, including those subject to facilites charges, is included in the Company's base rate revenue requirement determinations. However, in renition that Idaho Power receives revenue from customers through facilities charges on certin isolated facilites, the Company offsets the revenue requirement that would otherwse be recovered through base rates wih annual facilites charge revenues reived for thos isolated facilities. If the facilties charge rate was increased, thereby incrasing facilties revenue, there would have to be an associated reduction in base rates. The opposite is tru when the facilties rate is decreased, as proposed by the Company in this case. The Company does not agree that this is counterintuitive to basic raemaking principles, but rather the Company believes that its tratment of facilities charge revenue is aligne wi basic rate making principles. The sum of the revenue frm base rates and the revenue frm facilites charges alwys reflects the recovery of the most currntly approved cost of owning, operating, and maintaining facilities. This would be the case regardless of the amount of the facilities charge rate. The amount of the facilities charge rate and the resulting level of IDAH POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 2 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-ll-oS Reading, ICIP PageS revenue included in a revenue reuirement case simply determines the amount of the overall revenue requirements that the Company expec to collect frm facilities charg customers.and the amount to be recovered in base rates. The response to this Request was prepare by Timothy E. Tatum, Senior Manager of Cost of Servce, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wih Jason B. Williams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 3 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 6 . ' . . . . . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 47: In response to ICIP's Request for Production NO.7 (a) the Company stated, "In the Company's revenue requirement calculation for the determination of base rates, facilities charges are trated as a revenue credit." (a) Please explain why the monthly payment of a facilties charge is considere a "creit rather thn revenue to th Company such as the rate per kWh. (b) Please explain fully how a "revenue credil difers frm other monthly revenue the Company receives from a customer. Please also identif the Commission order, page and line number authorizing this "revenue credit" treatment. (c) Please explain whether there is a corrsponding "debit" or charge to the custmer class (or all customer classe) for the Company's costs associated with the facilties charge prior to payment of the facilties charge by the customer and the "creit" to the customer class revenue requirement calculation. Please fully explain how the costs associated with and reovered for the facilities charge are factored into each phase of th calculation of revenue requirement and base rates. (d) Please explain how the customer class's revenue requirement and base rates would be affected by a failure of all customers in the class to pay the facilities charge. In that case, would the Company recover its costs assoated with the facilties charge through the customer class's base rates rather than through individual customers' payments of their facilitie charges? If not, please explain how the Copany would recover the costs associated wih the facilities beyond the point of delivery for that customer class. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 4 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 7 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 47: (a) Monthly facilities charges are booked as other revenue to the Company for revenue requirement determinations. Revenue recived frm customers paying a facilities charge is applied as a credit or offt to the assciated customer classes' base rate revenue requirement. This accunting tratment is no different than how all "Oter Revenue" Is credited to the assciated customer classes' revenue requirements. (b) Idaho Power prepares its revenue requirement in a general rate case for the purpose of determining the level of revenue to be collected through base rates. Because the purpse of the revenue requirement determination is related to base rate development, all "Other Revenue" is applied as an offt. This accounting tretment has been authorized in the Idaho Public Utilties Commission's ("Commission") approval of previously filed cost-of-service models, including the Company's last general rate case, IPC-E-08-10, Order No. 30722. (c) Prior to accounting for the revenue from facilties charges, all costs for the facilties installed beyond the Company's point of delivery are included in the assoiated customer classes' revenue requirement. When the facilities charge revenue is applied as a revenue crit or offset, the associated customer classs' revenue requirement is thereby reuced. Please see the Company's response to Micron's Request No. 3-3 for an explanation of how revenues are applied as a creit in the Company's cost-of- service modeling. (d) If the Company receives revenue frm facilities charge customers that is either reuce or eliminated, then the amount of the offet or revenue creit to the associated customer classes' revenue will be reduced and the overall revenue IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 5 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-ll-0S Reading, ICIP PageS ~.. I . . . . . . . .. ~ requirement for that assciated customer dass wil increase as a result. In a case where all customers in a class failed to pay the facilities charge, the Company would recover all of its costs associated with the facilities charge through the customer class's base rates as thre would be no offet (revenue credit) to the customer class. See the Direct Testimony of Scott D. Sparks, p. 41, the Company's response to the Industrial Customers of Idaho Powets ("ICIP") Request for Production Nos. 6(b), 7(a), and 46 which explain how reuctions in revenue wil result in a corresponding increase in . revenue requirement for the associated customer class. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulator Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wi Jason B. Willams, Cororate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 6 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 9 REQUEST NO. 3-: How.are Acc. 456 and each sub-accun creit to retail and any other customer group? Cite filing reerences for such crit. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3-3: The firs step in creditng Account 456 revenues to customer groups is to classif and functonalize each sub-account. As shown on lines 290-297 of Larkin Exhibit No. 31, each sub-account that comprises Accunt 45 is classifed as being either customer-related, demand-related, or energy- related and is further identifie wih one or more of the Company's operating functions, such. as prouction and/or transmission. Once each sub-accunt has been classifed and functionalized, as shown in Larkin Exhibit No. 31, the segmented revenues are transferre to the "Otr Revenues" summary table, provided as page 3 of Larkin Exhibit No. 32. This table compiles revenues from Accunts 415, 451, 454, and 456 by classifcation and functonal category in order to align the various components of each accunt with the appropriate allocation factors. After the revenues have been compiled by classification and functional category, they are allocated to rate classes as shown on pages 25 and 26 of larkin Exhibit No. 33. Finally, class-allocated revenues are summed on line 18 of Larkin Exhibit No. 35, serving as a credit to each class in the development of fmal classspecifc revenue reui~ments. The reponse to this Request was prepare by Matthew T. Larkin, Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wih Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY ~ 4 Exhibit No. 303 IPC-E~l1-08 Reading, ICIP Page 10 . .f . . . . . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-I1-08 INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXHIBIT NO. 304 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,45,60,64,65,66,67,69, and 71 Regarding the Lack of Depreciation of Facilities Charge Equipment EXHIBIT Yo. ?fj. -t ...d. ;p . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCnON NO. 21: Reference Direct Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 38, lines 12-13 (stting tht the "Book Depreiation" coponent of the facilties charge uses "a straight line annual depreciation of assets based on a levelized 31 year basis"). (a) Please admit or deny that the Company does not reuce the principal of the initial investment In facilities by a depreciation factor. If deny, please explain how the Company reuces the principal. (b) Please admit or deny that the principle (sic) on facilties subject to the facilites charge is the same in year 1 as it would be in year 50. If deny, please explain. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCnON NO. 21: (a) Under the Company's apprve and effective facilities charge methodoloy, the principal of the inital investment for a piece of equipment does not change unless it is removed or replace. However, the depreiation component of the facilties charg represents a declining net book value that has been converted into a levelized amount base on a 31-year useful life assumption. (b) Please se the Company's response to (a) above. The reponse to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wih Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTON OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 23 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page i REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22: Reference Direct Testmony of Sctt Sparks, p. 38, lines 12-13 (stating tht the "Book Depreciation" component of the . facilties charge uses "a stight line annual depreiation of assets based on a levelized 31 year basis"). Please explain why customers should pay an additional charge for th depreciation in value of the facilities. Please explain why. depreciation in value of the facilities over time should not decrese the amount customrs pay over time for use of that equipment. _ RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22: Please. se the Company's reponse to the Industrial Customers of Idaho Powets ("ICIP") Request for Proucton No. 21. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst. Idaho Power Copany, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company.. IDAHO POER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POER - 24 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 2 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23: Reference Dirct Testimony of Scott SparKs. p. 38, lines 12-13 (stating that the "Book Depreiation" component of th facilities charge uses "a straight line annual depreciation of assets based on a levelized 31 year basis"). Plese identif any rate-based asset for which the Commission allows the Company to charge the same annual rate on the same principal amount over time when the value of the asset decrese over time. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23: There are no rate- based asset for which the Commission allows the Company to charge the same annual rate on the same pricipal amount over time when the value of the asset decreses over time. This is also not the case wi the facilities charge. As describe by Mr. Sparks on page 38 of his testimony, the facilities charg is calculated using a 31- year depreciable life assumption. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Powr Company, in consultation wi Jaso B. Willams. Corprate Counsel. Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 25 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 3 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24: Reference Direct Tesmony of Scott Sparks, p. 38, lines 12-13 (stating that the "Book Depreciation" component of the facilities charge use "a straight line annual depreciation of assets based on a levelizd . 31 year basis"). (a) Please explain what steps Idaho Power takes if a piece of equipment fails prior to the expiration of the 31-year depreion scheule. (b) Does the Company have manufacturets warrnties on any of the equipment subjec to the facilities charge? (c) Has the Company ever filed an insurance claim to replace equipment subjec the facilties chae sinc 1987? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24: (a) lf a piece of equipment fails prior to the expiration of the depreciation schedule, then it is removed from the customets facilities charge investent calculation . and the investment costs for a replacement piece of equipment is added to the customets facilities charge investmnt. (b) The Company has limited manufactrets warrntes on some equipment subjet to the facilties charge, such as transformers. (c) No. Please see the Company's response to ICIP's Request for Prouction No. 18. The respnse to this Request was prepred by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, In consulttion with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel. Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 26 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 4 . .REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 25: Reference Direct Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 38, lines 12-13 (stating that the "Book Depreation" component of the facilites charge uses ICa straight line annual depreciation of assets based on a levelized 31 year basis"). (a) Please explain if Idaho Power continues to charge th facilities charge (the monthly percntage rate multiplied by the Company's initial investmnt) after the 31 year deprciation perid expires. (b) For Schedules 9, 19,24 and Speial Contrct Customers, please identify the oldest piec of equipment for which the Company is stil assessing the monthly faciliies charge to a customer in each class. Please include the year the Company purcased and installed the equipment, the Scheule of the customer, and the initial.cost of the piece of equipment. (c) With regard to the pieces of equipment identified in (b). is the Company stil calculating the customers' monthly facílites charge by multiplying the monthly facilities charge percentge by the initial investment? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR pRODUCTION NO. 25: (a) Under the facilities charge provisions, Idaho Power charges a monthly facilites charge for equipment installed beyond its point of delivery as long as the equipment is instlled and used and usefuL. (b) For Schedule 9, the oldest pieces of equipment (24 in total) for which the Company is assessing a monthly facilities charge were purchased and installed in 1969 with a combined initial investmen $15.329. For Schedule 19, the oldest piec of equipment (2 in total) for which the Company is assessing a monthly facilities charge .IDAHO POER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 27 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP PageS were purcase and installed in 1945 wi an inital invetment of $259. No customers under Schule 24 are being assssed a facilites charge. Importntly, whether a piece of equipment fails 5 years or 45 years afer installation, the Company, under the tariff facilites charge provisions, wil replace the piec of equipment and adjust custmers' facilties charge for the equipment being removed and the equipment being installed. (e) Yes. Please se the Company's response to (a) above. The respns to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyt, Idaho Power Company, in consulttion wi Jason B. Wiliams, Corprate Counsel. Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 28 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E- 11-08 Reading, ICIP Page 6 . . . .""ID~POe An IDACRP company JASON B. WILLIAMS Corprae Counsel jwilliamstfdahopoer.com September 22, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY Jean D. Jewell, Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street Boise, Idaho 83720 Re: Case No. IPC-E-11-08 General Rate Case Dear Ms. Jewell: . Enclosed for filing are an original and one (1) copy of Idaho Power Company'sCorrected Response to the Industrial Customers of Idaho Powets Request for Proucton No. 45 in the above matter. It was recently discovered that a couple of the date ranges provided in the table in Idaho Power Company's initial response were incorrect. In addition, language has been added to the response for clarification. For everyone's convenience, the wording that has been added or changed from Idaho Power Company's initial response has been underlined. If you have any questions about this corrcted response, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ,c;á/de Jason B. Wiliams ."' ~ JBW:csb Enclosures cc: Service list .1221 W. h::thQ$t. £83102) 304 P.O. Box *xniDit 1'0. Boise, 10 JJll-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 7 . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45: Reference Direct Testimony of Scott Sparks, pp. 34-41. (a) How long has Idaho Power charged a facilities charge for Schedules 9, 19, and Special Contract customers? (b) Please provide the monthly facilities charge for each year separately since the Company first began charging the facilties charge for Schedules 9, 19, and Special Contract customers who have paid a facilities charge. CORRECTED RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45: (a) Existing Company records indicate that facilities chrges have been in place since February 1995 for Schedule 9, January 1976 for Schedule 19, and 1964 for one special contract. (b) Based on available Company recrds, the historical monthly facilties .charge rates for Schedule 9, Schedule 19, and one special cotract customer are provided in the table below. Year 1995 - Present 1976 - Present 1964 -1976 1976 - Present Schedule 9 1.7% Schedule 19 Special Contract 1.7% 1.25% 1.7% Tariff and special contract revisions went into effct in January 1976. which revised the monthly facilties charge rate from 1.25 percnt to 1.7 percnt per th Idaho Public Utilities Commission's Order No. 12307 in Case Nos. U-1006-100 and U-1006- 101. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S CORRECTED RESPONSE TO THE . INDUSTRiAl CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45 _ ,xhibit No. 304 IPC-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP PageS . . . The response to this Request was prpared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 2200 day of September 2011. \~'~~~.omey for Idaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S CORRECTED RESPONSE TO THE . . INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45 _ lxhibit NOO.8304 IPC-E-ll- Reading, ICIP Page 9 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 60: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 25. (a) What is the average and median age (in years) of distributn facilites . installed beyond the point of deliver curr in service? Please organize the reponse by schedule or Special Contract. (b) What is the average and median age (in years) of distribution facilties instafled beyond the point of deliver at the time that the equipment fails or is taken out of servce by the Company? Please organize the response by schedule or Special Contract. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 60: (a) The average and median age (in years) of distributon facilties I,nstalled and currently in servce beyond the Company's point of delivery for Schedule 9, Schedule 19, and one Special Contract customer is provided in the table below.. AverageAae Median Age Schedule 9 17 14 Schedule 19 18 16 Soecial Contract 24 25 (b) The Company does not track or rerd the average and median age (in years) of distribution facilities installed beyond the point of deliver at the time that the equipment fails or is taken out of servic by the Company. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 27 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-l 1 -08 Reading, ICIP Page 10 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 64: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 45. (a) Please provide the Company's records demonstrating that the facilities charge has been in place since 1995 for Schedule 9, 1976 for Schedule 19, and 1964 for Schedule 29/Special Contct (b) Please explain how the Company charged customers for distrbutn facilities beyond the pont of delivery prior to these dates for each schedule. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 64: a) Please see the attached PDF file for Company reords demonstrting when the facilities charge went into place for Schedule 9, Schedule 19, and Scedule 29 (Special Contract). b) Prir to implementing falities charge provisions, the costs associated with most customer-dedicated distributin facilties installed beyond the Company's point of delivery were included in the Company's general rate base and allocaed to the assciated customer class. For some large power users, the Company had service contracts in place that accounted for facilities installed beyond the Company's point of delivery. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analys, Idaho Power Company, In consulttion with Jason B. Willams. Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCON OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER _ 2 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-l 1-08 Reading, ICIP Page 11 IDAHO POWER COMPANY 8M PU UTOOIS ORIGINAl SHEET NQ 9-2 APVE EFCTl.P.u. NO. 26. TARIff NQ 101 Æ8J-'9 fE 1-'9 . SCHEDULE 9 lA GENERAL SERYJE (Contiue)~ fl ..a... -- FACUTIES BEYOND THE POINT OF PEUYERY At the option of the Compny, trorer and other facilitie inaHed beyond th Poit of Deiver to prvide Prima or Transmision Serice may be owned. opered, and maintained by th Coy in coneration of th Cusom payin a Facis Char to th Company. Copay-one Foites Beond th Poit of Deer wI be set for in a Dis Faßties Invest Repo provIde to the Cusomer. As th Comany's invesent in Faciliti Beyond th Poit of Dever changes in order to provie the Customs seic requiments, the Company shall noti th Cusome of the additions an/or deletins of facilities by forwng to th Customer a revied Disbution Facilities Investmnt Repor. In th event the Cusomer requests the Company to remove or renstall or change Company- ow Fos Beyond the Point of Deliver. the Cusome shaR pa to th Compay the "non- salabl cost" of such removal. relnsaRaton or change. Non-able cost as us herein is compred of th total oninal co of matals, labor and over of th facDties. les the dierene betwee the salable cos of materal removed and reval taor co inclding apprpñate over cos. POR FACOR .Where the Cusomers Power Factor is les than 85 pernt. as deteined by measurement un actual load coitons. th Cony ma adjus th leW meaured to deterine th BiIRng De by mulplg the measur kW by 85 peent and dividing by the actual Power Factor. MOHLY CHARGE The Monthly Char is th su of the Custome. th Bac. the Demand. the Ener, and the Facmties Chares at the folowing rate SECONDAR SERVICE Cus Charge $5.50 pe meter per month Basic Chae $0.36 pe kW of Basc load Capacit Demand Chge $2.68 per kW for all kW of Demand En Chqe Power CosAdjusten O.1449it Effective Rate. 2.7197it pe kWh for all kWh be Rate 2.748st IDAHO Issue - Februar 3. 1995 Efcle - Febar 1. 1995 Per IPUC Order No. 258 Iss by IDAHO PO_~g~i O. H. Jacks, Vice Presld _ _ ~iion 1221 Wes Idaho Sfr , Page 12 . .I.P.U.C. NO_ 17, TARIFF NO. 101 ( ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 19 IDA POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE NO 19 UNIFORM RATE tOCT AVAILABIlITY At points on the Compny's distribution system in Idaho, for loads fro 750 to 15,000 kilowatts where, inthe Comany's sole judgmt, existing facilities of adeQlate capacity and desired voltage are adjacent to the premise to be served, and additional investmnt by the Copany for new transmission, substation. distribution or terminal facil ities is not necessary to supply the desired service, and subject to provisions set fo~h in an Electric Service Agreent between the Company and Customr APPLICABILITY - To all firm electric service suppl ied to a Customr at one premise. where all service required by theCustomr is suppl ied under this Schedule, at one point of delivery and mesured through one meter Not applic able to seasonal, brekdown, standby. supplementary. resale. shared service, mu1ti.family dwellings, electricboilers exceeding 2,000 KW capacltoy or in remte areas. TYPE OF SERVICE Three-phãse at approximately 60 cycles and at the distribution voltage available at the premise to beserved. . MOHl Y CHARGES The sum of Demnd, Energy and facilities Charges at the fOllOWing rates Demnd Charge $3.35 per KW for the first 250 KW of Demnd 2.05 per KW for each additional KW of Deand Energy Charge 11.90 mills per KWH for the first 100 KWH per KW of Dend 5.90 mills per KW for the next 190 KW per KW of Dend 4.10 mills per KWH for all additional K~H Facil ities Charge Service shall be supplied hereunder at primary distribution voltage and the Point of Delivery shall be where the Comany's lines first becom adjacent to CustOler's property. Transformrs and/or other facilIties, beyond the Point of Delivery and used to deliver por at utilization voltage to points of use at the option of the Comany, ma be owed, operated and maintained by Company in consideration of Customr paying to Comany a facilities charge of one and seven-tenths percent (1.7%) per month times the Company's investmt beyond the Point of Delivery High Voltage Discount (When service is taken at 44 KV or above) $90 00 for the first 250 KW of Dend o 24 per KW for each additional KW of Demnd Dend Determination The average KW supplied during the l5-consecutive-minute period of maximu use during the month, adjusted for power factor, but not less than 100 KW (not less than 250 KW when service is supplied at 44 KV or above) Power factor Adjustment Where the Customr's powr factor is less than 85%. as determined by measurent under actual load conditions, the Company may adjust the KW measured todetermine the Dend by multiplying the measured KW by 85 and dividing by the actual poer factorHi ni/l CharS. . The minimu charge shall be the Facilities Charge plus the highest of the fo1lowing (A) (B) The Dend Charge for the current month's maximum Deand An amount sufficient to make the Dend and Energy Charges for service under the agreemnt, for the 12-mnth period ending with the current moth, equal to 9 5 times the maximum Demnd Charge billed for any month during the term of the Agret and any renewals or extensions theref The minimum charge speified in the Agreemnt The Company may require the Customr to execute a service agreent specifying a higher minimum annual charge than would be provided under (A) or (B) when necessary to Justify the Comany's investment in servicefacilit1es ( C) .IDAHO Issued - January 26, 1976 Effective - January 28, 1976 Per ¡PUC Order No. 12307 Issued by IDAHO POER COPAI' By JAMS E BRUCE. President 1220 Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E- 11 -08 Reading, ICIP Page 13 ~. AGRE FOR SUPY OF POWE AN EI J R SIMID COMPAN Pocatello 1 Idso mA POWE COMAN i: AG, Ma and entered into the ~ ~ da of ~ ,0.1 1964, by and between J R SIM COMAN, an Idao co:m operatin a pJ.t for the production of fertilizer near Pocatello, Idao, hereiner referrd to a.s "Customer, It and :IO POWE COMAN, an electric utilty authorized to do business in the state of Idao, hereinafer referrd "to as rrcoman; WITNESSETH: o .2 'W, J R Sim10t Compan has pioneered the use of Southern Ida's phosphate rock deposits and for may ~a.s has operated So plat near Poce:tello, Idao, processing phosphate rock in order to maufactur phosphate fertUizers; and J R Simlot Compan is now in the process of instalng So new amonia..plax £or the proction of various grdes o£ a.om.um phosphte fertilze, which new plat will requre the use of increasin large amts of power in order to process the phosphate rock an the electric power rec;rents at this plant have increased from approtely 1,000 KW in 1952 to So:prox- :mtely 6,80 ia in 1962, an it is anticipated that 'the new amnia pla't 'Wll increase the power re~irements to a.pproxtely 15,00 KW; an 0.3 WH, the continued growth an exanion of' 'this plat an the use and development of' the phosphate rock deosits of Soutl:ern Idao ar of vital imrtance to the grwth an prosperty of the econo of the Sta.te of Ida an the establishmen of an instrial ra.te for electric power suplied to t.his t.ype of business will materialy aid an Mats-t the econom of Idao; an - 0.4 WB, the Idaho Power Comany has developed So large inds1riaJ . rat.e for customers whose uses will be in the neighborhood of 15,000 XW or Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 14 . . . . - 2 - more and ar engaged, in the State of Idao, in mini, milli.. smel'ting.. refining or processing.. where such delivery can be mae from the Coanyls exsting 138 KV tranmission lines 'Wthout requiring additiona exense f'or facili'ties supplied by the Company; and 0.5 WE, the load of the ;¡ R Si:lot Company at its plat near Pocatello 'Wll mee't these requirements, since this load 'Wll be used in processing, delivery can be mae at the Coman's existing Don Substation .wi thout adtional exense to the Company and the rate 'Wll aid in developing and fostering 'the economy of' Idaho; and .0.6 WB.1 the parties hereto desire to set forth and establish the terms and conditions under whch power Will be available to Customer; NOW.. T:ORE.. in consideration of the premses and the mutua benef'its frm the covenants hereinafter set forth.. the paries hereby age as follows: Aricle I - Term of Agreement 1.J. The origial term of this agreement shal be for a period begiming on the date of' intial service and ending June 30, 1974, which 'term sha be autom'ticall reewed an exended for an addtiona period of' five (5) years.. and from year to year thereafer, uness and until either pary sha no'ti:t the o'ther pary in wrting not J.ess tha twelve (12), mon'ths prior to any such e:iration date of its intention to 'terminate 'ts agremnt. 1.2 The date of' initial servce under this agreement shal be the f'rst da of that month in whch the CUstomer first establishes a ma. demd of 10.. 000 kilowat'ts of power. Aricle n - Power to be Supplied 2.1 The Customer agrees to purchase, receive and pay for, an the Coany ages 'to supply.. al elec'tric servce required by Cus'tomer f'or 1'ts :Él\~4 IPC-E-11-oS . Reading, ICIP Page 15 - 3 -. maufacturing operations near Pocatello ~ Idaho ~ such power and energy, up to the amount of 20,000 kilowatts ~ sh be supplied and paid for at the rate set forth in paragph 5.1, it being agreed that vñen the Cutomer's demad exceeds such amunt it is the intention of the paries that new and superseding rates will be agred upon~ applicable to CUstomer t s load and service as then required. 2.2 The Contract Amunt of this ageement for each month shal be the ma dema (kilowatts) of power taken by Customer in any clock ha-hour in~erv durng the calenda month but not less tha l5~000 KW; l?rovided, howeer, during the development period subsequent to the date ot' initia. servce, the Con1:ract Amunt for the month sha be the actual maui dem (kilowatts) delivered to CUstomer in an clock hai-hour period durng the ca.enda month. The Contract Amunt for the exired tem of this ageement shaJ be the ma Contrac Amunt established in e:y month subsequent to the date of intia. service under this agement.. Aricle III - Facilities to be Prvided 3.1 Power and energ to be supplied hereunder by the Coman is available 'to the Cutomer at 12,500 volts at the Coan's Don SUbstation near Poca'tell, Idao, without adtional investment by the Company. All facilities 1ncludng switching, transformtion, regution and protective deices necessar for the delivery .of power and energy at that point åre instaled. 3.2 The Customer requests the Company an the Company is ~eable to instaJ, ow, operate~ an maintain the facilities necessar to deliver the power frm 'the Don SUbstation to the Customer's plant at 12,500 volts and the traf'orma.- 'tion equipment requred by Customer l s utilization equipment. Customer agees to pay the cost of such facilities and equipment in acco:rce With the pro- visions of paragaph 5.4 ini. Material and labor required beyond the seconda termnas of trasformers shall be installed, owed, operated, mantaind~ and. pad for by Customer. It is understood and agred that all the work performed .Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 16 . .. - 4 - by 'the Compan under this paragraph sha be in accordce with ai i.aa and sta.te rues and regutions in respect to construction of said :faciJ.tiesJ' and the equi:pent used shal be standad items in the Company's system. 3.3 It is understood an agrd that the facilities required by Customer may vary from time to time)' and the Company's investment in these :facilties upon whch chages herein shall be based)' shal be determined in accordce with the Coman i S norm bookkeeping system. The Customer sha be noti:fied of a:y chan in equipment or investment, at the earliest :practicai date subse- quent to a.y chane in such equipment or investment .I by ietter :f the Coan .to Customer, Whch letter or letters of notification sha comrise Exbit A .and sha be a par of this ageement, and each suc: letter sha show the net investment incurred by the Colla.y in facilties required to deliver power and energy fr the Don Substation to the Customer 'S p1.. Aricle IV - Servce Specifications 4.1 The electric powr supplied under this agemeni shal be in the form of 'te-PhaseJ' alternting curent at a frequency of ~rotely 60 cycles per second, an at a nOl phase to phase potential of' approxitely 32,500 volts except under emergency conditions. 4.2 The point of' delivery for powe supplied hereunder sha be on the 12.1500 volt side o:f th Copan's Don Substation located near Poca.tell, Idao. 4.3 Th Company "W provide suitable metering equipment for obtaining measureents requred in connection 'Wth settlements under this ageement. Compan sha, at its own exense)' test such meteri equipmnt once in eac caenda year. Aricle V - Chges.5.1 Al electric powr and energy)' up to the emoun hereinabove specifiedJ' Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 17 . - 5 - shaJ be suplied and pad for at the Cam' s Pocatell ottice in accord- a.ce with the follwi monthly rate: ( a ) Dean Cbe -$1.80 per KW of Bill Demd (b) Energy Charge - 3.0 mill per K. for a. energy ( c) Billg Demad -The Bi J J i ng Demd sl be the Contract Amt of power for the currnt month established in a.ccordce with paagraph 2.2. (d) Tax Adustment Chge - If, after the date of this agrement, an new Or in- creased tax or taxes (other than income taxes andtaxes based on income) payable by Coan ar imosed UJon revenues received frm Customer hereunder, or upon power or energy sold to Customer hereunder, or upon power or energy generated for sUJply of Customr hereunr, Customer sha pay, in a. tion to the chages hereinabove specified, an amount su:icientto cover an such taxes payale by Co. 5.2 Themi. monthly chage sha be a. amunt equ 'to $2.00 times 'the Contract Amun for the exired term of this agemnt in accordce with . paph 2.2. 5.3 Power factor corrective apparaiius or equipinii necessa. to matain at al times as near unity power factor as possible shal be prvided by Customer; however, in event Cutomer's power factor is less th .95 laging" the Compan shal have the rlght and may eleci to intal e.tional power fac'tr corrctive equpmt in accordace with an under the pros:ions of' parph 3.3 hereof. 5.4 . In consideration for the facilities instald by the Coany in a.ccordce with Aricle III, Custoer sha pa.y to Coany eac month one and one -quarer percent (iti) of the total cost to the Comany as shown in the iat letter submitted by Comany to Customer in Exbit A of this agreement. Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 18 . . - 6 - In the event it becomes necessar to remove the facilities instaJed by the Company as proided by Aricle III and reinstall or chae the ~aci11ties, the Customer sh pay to Compan the "non-salvable cost" of such remval, reinsta1tion or chane. Non-salvable cost a.s used herein is comrised o~ the total cost of material, labor and overhead of installing the ~acili:ties, less the ditterence between the salvable cost of material reed an the reval labor cost includin appropriate overhead costs. Aricle VI - Liabiliti 6.1 Each pary 'W~ indeify and save harless the other pary agais1; loss, dae or liability, exclusive of costs and attorneys' ~ees,resultiii tram clas asserted by third persons against either or both parties to this.agreemnt on a.count ot injury or death to persons or daage or destNct:Lon o~ property occuring on such (indemifyng) pary's side o~ the a.oresaid point of delivery, uness such inJur or dage sha have resulted frm the sale negligence of the other pary; provided, however, tha.t each pay sha be solely responsible ~or Claims of and payments to its emlo;yes an agents tor injures occurrin in connection With their emloymen or arising out of an 'Wrkmen's comensation law. Aricle VII - Waivers 7.1 .A waver at any time by either party of a right with respeC' to any matter arising under this ageement, or a. failu to give an notioe provided ~or hereuner, sha not be deemed to be a waiver With respect to any subse- qunt matter 1 nor as the establishment of or consent to any pra.ctice uner this ageement or an interpreta.tion of any term or proision hereof. . Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-ll-0S Reading, ICIP Page 19 ... !.. - 7 - Aricle VIII - SUccessors and Assigns 8.1 This agreement sha inure to the benef'i t of' an be binding UJn the successors in interest, assigns and legal representatives of Cistomer and Company. Aricle IX - Comssion Jursdiction 9.1 Ths ageement, the rates, term and provsions herein set forth, and the respective rights an obligations of' the parties hereer, shs be sub- ject to the jurisdiction and reguatory authority of'the Idao Public Utilities Cossj,ön an the iaws of' the State of' Idao. Aricle X - Termination of' Existing Ageement 10.1 The contract between the parties, dated July 18.1 1961.1 is hereby termated on the date of intial servce set forth in parph 1.2 of this agemnt.. IN 'WS WBF.1 the parties have executed this agreement by their respective iiroper officers, .thereunto duly auhorized.1 on the day and year first hereinbove wrtten. J R SIM COMPAN ~BY~~-v~ Preside:i (CORP~ SEA) o/~L~.Se t :~~Presidë (CORPRA SEA) Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-II-08 Reading, ICIP Page 20 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 65: Reference the Company's Response to IOIP Reques No. 45, stating that the facilties charge has ben in place since 1995 for Schedule 9, 1976 for Schedule 19, and 196 for Schedule 29/Special Contract. Please reconcile this statement wih Company's Resnse to ICIP Request No. 25(b), stating that the oldest piec of equipment installed for Schedule 9 was installed in 1969, for Schedule 19 was installed in 1945, and Company'S Response to ICIP Request No. 25( c), stating that the Company is stil calculating the monthly facilties charge by multiplying the monthly facilities charge percntage by the initial investment for these pieces of equipment. For equipment already in the Company's possessin at the time of commencement of the facilities charge, did the Company use the value of the initial investment or the depreciated value of the equipment at the ti of commencement of the facilities charge? Please provide supporting evience for the explanation. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 65: The equipment identified in th Company's Response to the Industrial Customers of Idaho Powets ("ieip") Request No. 25(b) was instlled prior to implementatin of the facilities charge for Schedules 9 and 19. Once the facilites charge provisions were approved by the Idaho Public Utilites Comission ("Commission" or "IPUC") and implemented per the Company's tariff schedules, the initial value of this customer-dedicated equipment was included on the assoated customets Distributon Facilities Investment report ("OFI") use to calculate the monthly facilities charge. As stated in the Company's reponse to ICIP's Request No. 25(a), the equipment wil remain on the OFI as long as it is instlled and used and usefuL. IDAH POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER _ 3 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-l 1 -OS Reading, ICIP Page 21 For facilities beyond the point of delivery that were in servce and In the Company's possession prir to Implementatin of the facilities charge provisions. the Company use the inital investent in its calculation of the monthly facilties charge. The Company's current DFl's show the initial investment values used to calculate each facilites charge customets monthly facilties charge. The use of depreciated values has never been approved by the Commission and the Company has never used depreiated values to calculate monthly facilities charges. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst. Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 4 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-11-oS Reading, ICIP Page 22 . . . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 66: With regard to the equipment discussed in Request No. 65, did the Company begn charging the custmer in Schedule 9 a faclities charg in 1995 base upon the initial investment in a piece of equipment installed in 1969, or did the Company use the depreciated value of the 1969 piece of equipment in 1995? What value did the Company use and base on what depreciatin schedule RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 66: Please see the Company's response to ICIP's Request No. 65. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER _ 5 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 23 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 67: Wit reard to th equipment . discssed in Request No. 65: (a) Did the Company bean charging the customer in Schedule 19 a facilites charge in 1976 based upon the initial invetment in a piece of equipment instlled in 1945, or did the Company use the depreciated value of the 1969 piece of equipment in 1995? (b) What value did the Company use and based on what depreiation schedule? What value is the Company using for this piece of equipment today, the value at installation in 1945, or the depreiated value when the charge commence in 1976? (c) Please explain why this piec of equipment was not fully depreiated at the time the Company initated the facilities charge 31 years aftr the equipment was initially installed.. (d) Please explain how the Company has not over-recovered for this fully depreciated asset frm the Schedule 19 customer since 1976? RESPONSE TO REQUEST ~OR PRODUCTION NO. 67: (a) Please see the Company's reponse to ICIP's Request No. 65. (b) Please see the Company's response to ICIP's Request No. 65. (c) Including the depreiated value of equipment at the time the Company initiated the facilites charge was not, and currently is not, the Commission-approved methodology for calculating monthly facilities charges under the Company's tariff. (d) For this asset and othr assets instlled under the Commission-approved facilites charge provisions, the Company has fully recovered the cost of a depreiated IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 6 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 24 . . . . piece of equipment if and when it reaches its assumed 31-year depreciable life, as describe on page 38 of Scott Spårk testimony and the Company's responses to ICIP's Request Nos. 5, 21,. 22, and 23. If a piece of equipment is installed and used and useful beyond 31 years, the Company continues to provide redily available utilit grade equipment inventories, tools, manpower, response servces, and electrical knowledge and experience for keeping that piece of equipment in operation. In addition, the Company disagrees wih the characterization that it has "over-recovered" as the Company charges and collets what has been autorized by the Commission. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Williams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE sevENT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER _ 7 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP Page2S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 69: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 47(c), stating that all cost for facilities instlled beyond the point of . delivery are included in the assiated cumer classe' revenue requirement. and when the facilities charge revenue is applied as a credit or offet, the associated customer classes' revenue requirement is reuce. (a) When the Company includes the cots for distribution facilites beyond the point of delivery in the revenue requirement, does the Company use a depreciation schedule as it must for distribution facilites on the Company's side of the meter included in the revenue reuirement? Please explain how depreciation is considered when facilities beyond the point of delivery are included in the revenue requirement prior to the point that the Company crit facilities charge revenue back to the customer class's revenue requirement. (b) If the amount of the revenue requirement decreases over time to account . for depreciation, but the principal amount of the facilities charge to the individual customer does not decrease over time, please explain how the indivual facilities charge customer is not subsidizing the rest of the customer class. (c) If the amount of the revenue requirement does not decrease over time to accunt for depreciation of distributon facilities beyond the point of delivery, please explain how the Company is not over-revering for depreciated assts. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 69: (a) Yes. When determining revenue requirements for base rates, the Company does not identify and tret separately facilities installed beyond the Company's point of delivery. That is, the Company uses the same depreciation IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVEH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 9 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E- 11-08 Reading, ICIP Page 26 . ,t . . . methology for all distribution facilities when determining its test . year revenue reuirement. (b) Becuse the facilities charge calculation is based on a levelized revenue determination method and base rates are determined using a single test period method, there wil always be diffrences in the annual revenue requirements determined under each methd. These timing difernces or "subsidies" go in either direction for individual customers depending on the average age of the facilities subje to the facilites charge. For example, a customer wi newer facilities will pay less in facilities charges than the actual annual revenue reuirement with th rest of the customer class paying the difrence through thir base ras. The opposite is tre for customers wih older facilities who pay more in facilities charges than the single-yer revenue requirement would sugges (c) The amount of revenue requirement determined in a test year for a customer class that is eligible for facilities charges decreases over time to account for deprecitin of distrbution facilities installed beyond the point of delivery. All revenue received frm facilties charge customers is creited back to the asociated customer class leaving no chance for over-rvery. The response to this Request was prepared under the directn of Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corprate Consel. Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPOSE TO THE SEVENT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRiAl CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER _ 10 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 27 .. . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 71: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 53(c), stating that the Company recovers costs associated with uninsure amounts relate to failed facilites charge equipment by boking thse costs as expenses and incruding them in custmer rates. In light of this response, please explain the basis for not allowing for the facilties charge equipment's initial value to decrease over time as the piece of equipment depreciates. Please explain why the Company includes depreiation as a positve component to the facilties charge that will increase the amount th customer pays, rather than decrease it RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 71: The facUities charge rate calculation is based upon a 31-year depreciation schedule which is reflected in the retum and depreciation components of the rate. Depreciation is a positive component of the facilities charge beuse it reflects .the Company's recovery of its investent in the customer-dedicated facilities that it installs, owns, operates, and maintains without incresing the rates of customers in th assocated customer class. The monthly facilities charge is designed to recover all costs associated wih customer-dedicated facilities installed beyond Ui Company's point of delivery through a levelized cost-recovery approach. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analys, Idaho Powe Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 12 Exhibit No. 304 IPC-E-11-08 Reading, ICIP Page 28 . ~ .. . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-ll-08 INDUSTRI CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXHBIT NO. 305 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request Nos. 14, 15, 16, 18, 53, 58, 70, and 73 Regarding the Insurance and Early Failure of Facilities Charge Equipment EXHIBIT1'3l "" T~ . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: Reference Direct Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 39, Unes 15-20. Does the Insurance carred by the Company cover or indemnit customers from accent or injury associated with Company- owned facilites Installed beyond the Company's Point of Delivery If not, does the Company make new customers aware of the customets lack of coverage or indemnification for Idaho Power equipment on their propert RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: For Company-owned facilites installed beyond the Company's point of delivery, the insurance carred by the Company would cover any loss for which the Company was deemed neligent in an accnt or injury. The respnse to this Request was prepare by Tim Tucker, Propert and Casualt Administrator, Idaho Power Company, at the direction of Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analy, Idaho Power Company, in consulttion with Jason 8. Willams, Corprae Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 15 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-oS Reading, ICIP Page 1 REQUEST fOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: Reference Dire Testimony of Scot . Sparks, p. 39, lines 18-19 (stting the policy covers equipment subject to the facilties charge for "propert, casualt, and workers compensation"). Please explain what "propert is covered and in wht fashion. Please explain why Idaho Power believes that the policy covers "propert but do not cover ''facilit replacement costs." RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: The propert covere is the equipment on th customer's facilites charge and the reultng exposure crated by Idaho Power owning, operating, and maintining this equipment, which can result in propert, third-part liabilty, and workers' compesation losss. Idaho Power's propert insurance policy covers "propert damage that reults from an insure event but does not cover "facility replacement cost" assciated with normal wer and tear. Additionally, virtually all "insured" propert losse .occurrng beyond the Company's point of delivery would fall under Idaho Power's self-insured retention (deductible) and would . be an expens incurr directy by the Company. The response to this Request was prepare by Tim Tucker, Propert and Casualty Administrator, Idaho Power Company, at the directon of Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analys, Idaho Power Company, in consultn wih Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -16 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 2 . . . . REQUESI FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: Reference Diret Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 39, lines 15-20. Please provide a copy of the currntly effectve insurance polic(ies) referenced, and identif the provisions that apply to equipment subject to the facilities charge. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: Please se the attchd summaries of insurance programs currntly in place. Technically, there are no provisions that refer direly "to equipment subjec to the facilities charge" as Idaho Powets insurance stctre is a large "blanket" proram that would cover catastrophic losses associated wih third-part liabilty, property, and workers' compensation losses that could ocur at or near the facilities and equipment in quesion. Most losses that would occur wi facilites charge expsure would fall under deducble levels and would be paid directly by Idaho Power withut any insurance recovery. The response to this Request was prepare by Tim Tucker, Propert and Casualty Administrator, Idaho Power Company, at the directon of Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -17 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-ll-0S Reading, ICIP Page 3 Propert nAil Risk" Program including Boiler & Machinery . Named Insured: IDACORP and any subsidiary, and IDACORP's interest in any partnership or joint venture in which IDACORP has management control or ownership as now constuted or hereafter is acquired, as the respective interest of each may appear. Mailng Address: P.O. Box 70 Boise, 10 83707 Canier: Factory Mutal Insurance Company Policy #UW415 Policy Term: May 1, 2010 to May 1, 2011 Perils: All Risks of dire physical los or damage including th perils of eartquake and flood, including boiler and machinery, and vehicle physical damage. Policy Form: Power Generation GE 812008 Limits of Liabilit: $2,000,000,000 Policy Limit Sublimlts of Liabilty: The Company wil pay up to the following sublimits of liabilit in anyone ocurrence. These sublimits are part of, and do not serve to increase, the limits of liabilty above or the aggregate limits of liabilit below: $ 200,000,000 Annual aggregate Earthquake $ 200,000,000 Annual aggregate Flood $ 200,000,000 Annual aggregate Dams and Dikes $ 2,000,000,00 Annual aggregate TRIA $ 2,000,000,000 Demolition, Increased Cost of Constction $ 100,000,000 Automatic Coverage (90 days reporting required) - Excludes EM/Flood $ 100,000,000 Valuable Papers and Records $ 100,000,000 Accunts Recivable $ 10,000,000 Data, Programs or Softare and Computer Systems - Non Physical Damage combined $ 100,000,000 Errrs & Omissions $ 10,000,000 Miscllaneous Unnamed Loctions - Excludes EM $ 10,000,000 Bridges and Tunnels $ 10,000,000 Protection and Preservation of Propert - Time Element - Excludes Terrorism $ 10,000,000 Debris Removal $ 10,000,000 Decontamination Cost $ 20,000,000 Expeditng Expense and Exra Expense $ 50,000 Land and Water Contaminant Cleanup, Removal and Disposal $ 10,000,000 Rentallnsurance $ 10,000,000 Service Interruption - Non-Generation locations only- Excludes EM $ 100,000,000 Fine Arts $25,000 + 50% of Loss Professional Fees Included in Definiton of Propert Course of Constrction $ 10,000,000 Soft Cos $ 10,000,000 Transporttion . "SEE A TIACHEO" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP Page 4 . . Deductibles: $1,000,000 Combined all coverage's Including crs, except: $ 500,000 at locations 22,23,24,25,26,29,32,33, 34 and 41 Combined all coverge's $ 100,000 Combined all coverage's mobile equipmentlehicle physical damage 5% with $500,000 Min PD & TE Wind coverage in Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and 1 st Tier Wind Counties 3% with $500,000 Min PD & TE Wind coverage in 2nd Tier Wind Counties $ 50,000 Transporttion 2 Day I $500,000 Min. Computer Systems - Non-physical Damage 1% with $100,000 Min Terrrism Replacement cost, except on Transformers 25 years or older, or have not Valuation: been completely rewound within the past 25 years and mobile equipment, ACV 60-day notice of cancellation, 10 days for non-payment of premium Exclusions: * Business Interrption * Nuclear * New Turbines Installed or Acquired after Incetion * Settling, cracking, shrinking, bulging or expansion of dams and dikes..Special Conditions: * Ex Expense Coverage does not apply to the purchase of replacement power * Ex Expense Coverage does not apply to loss from power/energy trading or brokering actMties * Definition of Occurrnce: 72 Hours for Wind, Flood, Earthquake * Written Notice of LandlWater Contaminant Loss Required in 180 Days This Summary of Insurance is for your reference only. Please refer to your policy fo additional terms, coditions and exclusions that may apply. Total Insurable Value: $ 4,986,217,000 $ 1,897,000 Annual Premium Premium: $ 229,000 Terrrism Premium Induded Engineering Fees None Fees & Taxes Total Annual Premium: $ 2,126,000 Rate (per $100): 0.038 . 'SEE ATIACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 5 fo., ...i ¿,U 0~ .. ~~.. ~ ~.... r/r/r/fPfP': ~!iHèl ; ~ (l &;cia?a?~:=ci r/ ~ r/ ~ ~ S. (V .(V .. .. r/ ~.. fP r/ r/ r/S ~ 8S~ .. 0 ~ U)5- !å ~ cj ;:..z="'-:s ~a: .! ~~.. .o ei ø(. ~ ~oi c ('C CD ~_ C) ~=~ fJ :s )( ..w ä !: .... ~.oi 8o Îiõ a... 88888..C! C! C! C! C! ~~~~~~! 8 ~ e ~ ~(V lO .. co ..iõiõriÑuS.. l:s 00000008gg8g88òöòògòöggg80g8~~~~~~~ g ~ ~ ßö rs.. 00..Ñg..co ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ~'Q'Q'Qg!5l.l.l~;~ll;;.. .... ..Ñ Ñ . N Nen en ~ å ti ~..Ñ . N()N~ $..Ñ ER ER ER ~ ~ ER .gi en 0.!~~¿;U 0 0r/ ER r/~ tÓ fP r/ r/~ ~ la.. ò ~ r/ ..(l ø' fP(V .. ...0.. ~ " N r/ r/ r/ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~~ cò.. r/ r/ r/~!2. (V 8 ~'" ~ Ò "'~ ~ ~ ~I !æ ~ o..~. ¡ g......ö~ ggggglO C! C! q C! o. ~gggggi-qo.C!qC!~..NlOCON~il~~f8 iõ iõ ri ci uS.. l:s ggggggg0000000ggggggg0000000 iõ iõ iõ iõ iõ iõ iõ(V (V (V (V (V (V (V ggg'Q'Q-gg~~~..'llãí~... ,.. oÕÎ ~..iõ..~ ~i-~ena a.. N ci ER ER ER ~ ~I g ~ co co~gÑ ~I ~ EN g..co ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ~ ER .. (I i Ol ~cio~ ER o E ~ g 00000_gooooa,öââââ~00000l.o.qqqq:,~Cõ~""~NCO""~NiõiõriÑt-.. ~~~ g..co 000000gE8.EEEòooooo8gg8gg iõ iõ iõ iõ iõ iõ(V (V (V (V (V (V 000000 ~~ ~ .. s? ..~~ ~.. .. 00 (V (V Õ (Va: a: i a: (V (V 0 C'-g-g~~~~~~~ -_ê -_g _ê .. _ê 0 .. (V IlN (vlONN~ i:~~ ER ER ER ER ER ER ~.. ER Q) "2 i l .. l8 ~ l e ~! ~:i~ ~ _cuo3 o i:Q, ~ ~ di j= ~ l~ ãi _ j i P-ti ..:: .5 ~'Q_i: .ã 'So II l!ãs.g. ez ê :õi II 5. .ee.. II.. (I 5~ 1 õ l l l l::z - ~ :! ~ ¡¡ ~ ~ e ~ 8 ER .. ER ER .. ER § &. ~ ~ ~~ i'Q 8 (ll~ O=eo-e .ri:~:J o:J~8.æsil:: & II 2:~ 8'2~~'~8~II 0)0)-'5090)Q)..cuõ..c(o..~w:a~~~~!D.:ea.:õ..,Q_ ~ :: a. II .. .a 0. en .m ãi :J~~l,~i~æ.i-e::::'-'Ql~~8:f~l~e:J B ¡ '& fE B $ ii '& Æ '& m ~ $,ii ~ Æ ~ ~ .¡ .ê 8 Ifl8$j-~ e 0 l 8:-m~1- :: 0 e 'Q~ LL 0 .$ .!::iai ~LL W co 0: i '2IIo ~~ ~ 'Š0: ~ ..I- ~ (, oeãi .5 ." l-e.. :e' 0o 0 ê I-~l-'Ëå~aJ!8f Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-l I-OS Reading, ICIP Page 6 o.. a . òw:io~ ~ tt Cl . . "C : : . . t ' ~l T " C ~ I7 ~ n : r lT = - i . . . .. . q ; ' ~ s : I7 . . . . ~ . . : l .. ~ = o Q C ~ "C ~ .2 . ID A C O R P , I N C . Ex c e s s G e n e r a l l i a b i l t y . A E G I S Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 . J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 No t e s : 1. R e t e n t i o n s t o a p p l y i n c o m b i n a t i o n 2. Q u o t e i s n e t , n o c o m m i s s i o n i n c l u d e d , e x p i r e s o n J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 3. R e t r o a c t i v e D a t e : J u l y 1 5 , 1 9 8 6 4. C o v e r a g e c o n t i n u e s t o b e " C l a i m s - F l r s t - M a d e " - C o v e r a g e i s t r i g g e r e d w h e n t h e c l a i m i s f i r s t m a d e a g a i n s t " a n i n s u r e d " - n o t n e c e s s a r i l y w h e n t h e l o s s oc c u r r e d . F o r c o v e r a g e t o a p p l y u n d e r t h i s c o v e r a g e p a r t , c l a i m s m a d e a g a i n s t y o u m u s t b e b r o u g h t d u r i n g t h e p o l i c y p e r i o d . T h e o n l y o t h e r l i m i t a t i o n i s th a t t h e l o s s o r e v e n t m u s t h a v e o c c u r r d o n o r a f t e r t h e r e t r c a t i v e d a t e o u t l i n e d a b o v e . Fu r t h e r m o r e , t h i s a l s o c o n t a i n s t i m e s e n s i t i e c l a i m r e p o r t n g r e q u i r e s , c l a i m s m u s t b e r e p o r t e d a s s o n a s p r a c t i c a b l e d u r i n g t h e p o l i c y p e r i o d . C l a i m s ma y a l s o b e r e p o r t e d d u r i n g a n e x p e n t e d r e p o r t n g p e r i o d i f p u r c h a s e d . 5. C o m p l e t e c o p i e s o f a l l q u o t e s f o l l o w p r o p o s a l "S E E A T I A C H E D " . 61 2 8 1 2 0 1 0 -: : - l " .. . ~ ' " ~ Jg = t " e : ~ e : ~ g : QC = i . . 1J . . 2 ~ ~ = ¡: ~ ~ - = '" t i ID A C O R P , I N C . Sc h e d u l e o f U n d e r l y i n g Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 . J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 Un d e r l i n g L i m i t s : Ge n e r a l L i a b i l t y . a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Po l l u t i o n L i a b i l i t . a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Au t o m o b i l e l i a b i l i t - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Ca r e , C u s t o d y & C o n t r l . a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Em e r g e n c y A s s i s t a n c e A g r e e m e n t . a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Em p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l t y - a n y o n e o c c r r e n c e Jo n e s A c t - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e St a n d a r d s B o a r d A c t i v i t y Co m m u n i t y S e r v i c e A c t i v i t y Em p l o y m e n t P r a c t i c e s . e a c h c l a i m a n t Em p l o y m e n t P r a c t i c e s - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Fo r e i g n G e n e r a l L i a b i l t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e ( F o r l o s s e s o c c u r r n g p r I o r t o J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 7 ) (F o r l o s s e s o c c u r r i n g o n o r a f t e r J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 7 ) Fo r e i g n A u t o m o b i l e L i a b i l t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e ( F o r l o s s e s o c c u r r i n g p r i o r t o J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 7 ) (F o r l o s e s o c r r n g o n o r a f t e r J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 7 ) Fo r e i g n E m p l o y e r s L i a b i l i t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e ( F o r l o s s e s o c c u r r i n g p r i o r t o J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 7 ) (F o r l o s e s o c c u r r n g o n o r a f t e r J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 7 ) Wa t e r c r a f t ( P & I ) L i a b i l t y . a n y o n e o c u r r e n c e Ow n e d A i r c r a f t L i a b i l t y - N o v e m b e r 1 3 , 1 9 9 7 t o p r e s e n t - a n y o n e o c c u r r n c e Ow n e d A i r c r f t L i a b i l t y - p r i o r t o N o v e m b e r 1 3 , 1 9 9 7 . a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 50 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 $ 20 0 , 0 0 0 $ 20 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 20 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 30 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 20 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 6/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 0 3 "S E E A T T A C H E D " . . . '" : : - t r ~ t i ' " i i ll ~ n = - ~ Q . i . . . 1, . . . t r e : Jg ~ : : ~ . . z - i = n = . - Q C C H '" = lJ . . ID A C O R P , I N C . Sc h e d u l e o f U n d e r l y i n g Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 . J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 AS R E S P E C T S I D A H O P O W E R C O M P A N Y - T E X A A N D N E V A D A Em p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e AS R E S P E C T S I D A H O P O W E R C O M P A N Y - O R E G O N I D A C O R P Em p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l i t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e AS R E S P E C T S : Id a h o P o w e r S o l u t i o n s ( a b u s i n e s s u n i t o f I d a h o P o w e r C o m p a n y ) Hy d r o S e r v c e s G r o u p ( a b u s i n e s s u n i t o f I d a h o P o w e r C o m p a n y ) ID A C O M M , I n c . ( a s u b s i d i a r y o f I D A C O R P , I n c . ) ID A C O R P S e r v i c e s C o m p a n y ( a s u b s i d i a r y o f I D A C O R P , I n c . ) ID A C O R P E n e r g y ( a s u b s i d i a r y o f I D A C O R P , I n c . ) - p r i o r t o M a r c h 4 , 2 0 0 2 ID A C O R P F i n a n c i a l S e r v c e s , I n c . ( a s u b s i d i a r y o f I D A C O R P , I n c . ) pr i o r t o D e c e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 0 1 No r t h w e s t P o w e r S y s t e m s ( a s u b s i d i a r y o f I D A C O R P , I n c . ) p r i o r to A p r i / 1 , 1 9 9 9 Ge n e r a l L i a b i l t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r n c e $ AS R E S P E C T S I D A C O R P F I N A N C I A L S E R V I C E S . I N C . D e c e m b e r 1 8 . 2 0 0 1 Ge n e r a l L i a b i l t y - a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Ge n e r a l L i a b i l t y - a g g r e g a t e Au t o m o b i l e L i a b i l t y - n o n - o w e d a n d h i r e d o n l y a n y o n e o c c u r r e n c e Em p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l i t y - a n y o n e o c u r r n c e $$$$ 4 "S E E A T T A C H E D " $ 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 50 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 . 6/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 0 --CDOeN o -siõz ¡-- "C b~ C ::0. ;: .,~ - .o 00(. J! ~~ :: N O "C ftCD an-.. _~b::., 0 0 0 8 00880000 c5 c5 c5 c5 c500EE0~0 ~..C'...... fß fß fß fß fß I I ~ ~:ë :ëco co:: :: ~ ~CD CDi: i:CD CD (! (! g e!:;II.S0)c:'s;'t CD"C §~ "C ~ ~ 8õi: i 8o ~¡ Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-OS Reading, ICIP Page 10 o.. ~ ~ . bw:i~ .!; .ww ip 10 . ~ : = . . . l . ~ l ' ~ ~ lJ ~ n = , l' i : i . . . .. 5 i r r s : .. I J . . . . ~ . . ~ 1= ~ ? .. Q C ( M ~ ~ . . . ID A C O R P , I N C . Ex c e s s W o r k e r ' s C o m p e n s a t i o n w A E G I S Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 w J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 AE G I S AE G I S % Ch a n g e AE G I S % Ch a n g 08 - 0 9 09 - 1 0 20 0 8 . 2 0 20 0 9 . 2 0 1 0 va . 20 1 0 . 2 0 1 1 va . 09 - 1 0 10 - 1 1 Ex p o s u r e D a t a : Es t i m a t e d P a y r o l l El e c t r i c $ 74 , 3 3 5 , 6 7 5 $ 78 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 5. 6 0 % $ 83 , 8 5 5 , 0 2 9 6. 8 2 % Ai r c r a f t $ 17 4 , 7 1 9 $ 18 5 , 0 0 0 5. 8 8 % $ 20 3 , 0 3 9 9. 7 5 % Cl e r i c a l $ 43 , 7 8 8 , 9 4 2 $ 46 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 6. 1 9 % $ 54 , 9 1 4 , 6 1 0 18 . 1 0 % Of f c e T r a v e l $ 30 , 0 2 3 , 0 6 3 $ 31 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 4. 9 2 % $ 36 , 4 6 9 , 1 3 2 15 . 7 8 % To t a l E s t i m a t e d P a y r l l $ 14 8 , 3 2 2 , 3 9 9 $ 15 6 , 6 8 5 , 0 0 0 5. 6 4 % $ 17 5 , 4 4 1 , 8 1 0 11 . 9 7 % Nu m b e r o f E m D l o v e e s 1, 9 9 6 2, 0 2 5 1. 4 5 % 20 2 0 -0 . 2 5 % Po l i c y F o r m : 71 0 0 ( 3 / 2 0 0 7 ) 71 0 0 ( 3 1 2 0 0 7 ) Li m i t $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0. 0 0 % $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0. 0 0 % Ex c e s s o f S e l f I n s u r a n c e R e t e n t i o n : $ 50 0 , 0 0 0 $ 50 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 % $ 50 0 . 0 0 0 0. 0 0 % Av e r a e R a t e l o a v r o l l $ 0. 0 0 1 5 $ 0. 0 0 1 5 -2 . 8 0 % $ 0. 0 0 1 3 -1 3 . 4 6 % Co s t : Pr e m i u m $ 20 5 , 9 7 9 . 0 0 $ 21 2 , 5 1 2 . 0 0 3. 1 7 % $ 20 6 , 3 2 5 . 0 0 -2 . 9 1 % TR I A $ 19 , 4 8 6 . 0 0 $ 19 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 -2 . 4 9 % $ 18 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 -5 . 2 6 % Su r o l u s L i n e s T a x e s a n d F e e s $ 3, 9 4 5 . 6 4 $ 40 5 1 . 4 6 2. 6 8 % $ 3. 9 2 5 . 6 9 -3 . 1 0 % To t a l C o m D a n v E x ø e n s e s $ 22 9 4 1 0 . 6 4 $ 23 5 5 6 3 . 4 6 2. 6 8 % $ 22 8 . 2 5 0 . 6 9 -3 . 1 0 % 6 6/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 0 'S E E A T I A C H E O " "d ~ " ' L " ~~ " d ~ lI ~ n e : ~ e : t r s : .. = I . . N~ : : Z .. ~ I : n 0 0 ~ =a ~ ID A C O R P , I N C . Ex c e s s W o r k e r ' s C o m p e n s a t i o n . A E G I S Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 . J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 No t e s : 1. N o t l a t e r t h a n 2 4 m o n t h s f r o m e n d o f t h e p o l i c y p e r i o d , a d v i s e c o m p a n y o f a l l c l a i m s n o t s e t t l e d t h a t a r e l i k e l y t o r e s u l t i n c l a i m s u O O e r th i s p o l i c y . S e e i t e m ( H ) R e i m b u r s e m e n t ( 2 ) , p a g e 5 o f p o l i c y f o r m 2. P o l i c y f o m c o n t a i n s c h a n g e i n ( N ) D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n a n d S e r v i c e o f S u i l S e e ( 2 ) M e d i a t i o n . n o w u s i n g l a s t p u b l i c h e d m o d e l p r o c e u r e o f me i a t i o n i n l i e u o f c u r r n t C P R i n s t l t u e m o d e L . 3. Q u o t e i s n e t , d o e s n o t i n c l u d e a n y c o m m i s s i o n 4. Q u o t e e x p i r e o n J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 Cl a i m R e p o r t i n g T e r m s : Wr i t t n N o t i c e t o t h e c o m p a n y a s s o o n a s p r a c t i c a b l e i n t h e e v e n t o f : a) D e a t h ; b) A m p u t a t i o n o f m a j o r e x t r e m i t y o r o n e o r m o r e d i g i t s o f d o m i n a n t h a n d ; c) S e r i o u s h e a d i n j u r y ; d) L o s o f s i g h t i n o n e o r b o t h e y e s ; e) P a r a p l e g i a o r g u a d r i p l e g i a w h e t h e r c o m p l e t e o r p a r t a l ; f) B a c k i n j u r y r e q u i r i n g t w o o r m o r s u r g i c a l p r o c e d u r e s ; g) A n y c l a i m i n v o l v i n g o n g o i n g d i s b i l t y w h e n i t b e c m e s k n o w n t h a t t h e d i s a b i l i t y w i l c o n t i n u e f o t h r e e y e a r s o r m o r e ; h) B u m i n j u r i e s i n v o l v i n g s e c n d d e g r e e b u m s o v e r t w n t y - f i v e p e r c e n t ( 2 5 % ) o r m o r e o f t h e b o d y o r t h i r d d e g r e e b u r n s I) A n y i n c i d e n t w h i c h c a u s e s s e r i o u s i n j u r y t o t w o o r m o r e e m p l o y e e s ; j) A n y c l a i m i n v o l v i n g o c c u p a t i o n a l d i s e a s e ( e . g . , a s b e s t o s i s , s i l c o s i s , b l a c k l u n g d i s e a s e ) w h e n s u c h d i s e a s e b e c o m e s f o r m a l l y d i a g n o s e d ; o r k) A n y c l a i m i n v o l v i n g p e r m a n e n t a O O t o t a l d i s a b i l t y . 7 .S E E A T T A C H E D " . . 6/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 0 . "' : : - l " ~ ~ " ' i l IJ ~ r i = - ~ S : t . Q : ji = I _ . (, I J . . . . ~ . . z - i e ri = . _ C l ( , "' = ui . . . ID A C O R P , I N C . Ex c e s s L i a b i l i t y . E l M Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 . J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 El M El M % Ch a n g e El M % Ch a n g e 08 - 9 09 - 1 0 20 0 8 . 2 0 0 9 20 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 vs . 20 1 0 - 2 0 1 1 vs . 09 - 1 0 10 - 1 1 Ex p o s u r e D a t a : An n u a l G r o s s R e v e n u e $ 87 9 , 3 9 4 , 0 0 0 $ 94 0 , 4 1 4 , 0 0 0 6. 9 4 % $ 1, 0 4 5 , 9 9 6 , 0 0 0 11 . 2 3 % Ki l o w a t t H o u r s ( M i l l i o n ) Re s i d e n t i a l 5, 2 2 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 5, 2 9 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1. 3 4 % 5, 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0. 0 6 % Co m m e r c i a l - N o n I n d u s t r i a l 5, 8 6 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 5, 8 9 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0. 5 3 % 5, 5 0 8 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -6 . 5 2 % In d u s t n a l ( m a n u f a e t u n n g ) 3, 4 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 3, 3 5 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -2 . 8 7 % 3, 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -6 . 4 1 % Wh o l e s a l e ( p u b l i c a u t h o r i t i e s & o t h e r u t i t i t i e s ) 2, 7 4 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 2, 0 4 8 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -2 5 . 3 6 % 2, 8 3 6 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 38 . 4 8 % To t a l 17 , 2 8 6 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 16 , 5 9 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 -4 . 0 1 % 16 , 7 8 4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 1. 1 6 % To t a l E s t i m a t e d P a y r o l l 14 8 , 3 2 2 , 3 9 9 15 6 , 6 8 5 , 0 0 0 5. 6 4 % -1 0 0 . 0 0 % Nu m b e r o f E m p l o y e e s 1, 9 9 6 2, 0 2 5 1. 4 5 % 2, 0 2 0 -0 . 2 5 % Nu m b e r o f c u s t o m e r s 47 7 0 9 4 48 7 , 1 6 5 2. 1 1 % 48 9 9 2 7 0. 5 7 % Po l i c y Fo r m : FF X S ( 0 1 / 0 1 / 0 6 ) FF X S ( 0 1 / 0 1 / 0 6 ) FF X S ( 0 1 / 0 1 / 0 6 ) Li m i t s o f L i a b i l t y - P e r O c c u r r e n c e , s u b j e c t t o a $ 10 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 10 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 10 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 A n n u a l A g g r e a a t e f o r a l l O c c u r r n c e s Ex c e s s o f A e g i s - Ea c h O c c u r r e n c e $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 Jo i n t V e n t u r e . E a c h O c c u r r e n c e $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 Co m b i n e d P r o d u c t a n d C o m p l e t e d O p s U a b $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 Fa i l u r e t o S u p p l y A g g r e g a t e L i m i t $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 Po l l u t i o n L i a b i l i t A g g r e g a t e $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 Me d i c a l M a l o r a c e I n j u r y e a c h o c c u r r e n c e $ 35 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 35 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 Po l i c y P r e m i u m $ 36 8 , 4 2 2 . 0 0 $ 45 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 22 . 1 4 % $ 46 4 , 2 6 7 . 0 0 3. 1 7 % TR I A ( I n c l u d e d i n P r e m i u m ) $ 11 , 0 5 3 . 0 0 $ 13 , 1 0 6 . 0 0 18 . 5 7 % $ 13 , 5 2 2 . 0 0 3. 1 7 % Su r o l u s L i n e s T a x e s a n d F e e s $ 6, 6 4 0 . 8 1 $ 8, 1 0 4 . 3 6 22 . 0 4 % $ 8, 1 2 4 . 6 7 0. 2 5 % To t a l C o m D a n v E x p e n s e s $ 37 5 , 0 6 2 . 8 1 $ 45 8 . 1 0 4 . 3 6 22 . 1 4 % $ 47 2 , 3 9 1 . 6 7 3. 1 2 % 8 6/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 0 "S E E AT T A C H E D " § .~co jêi: ~Qlf0"i:~Ql ji Ol l- i:Ol i: Ql ..0 E ..CD Ql l-i: f '6::::0 ..""U i:CD .5 CD e ö..ie..i:1i 0 :E ~0 .i N CD fI i- ti ¡¡ iñ i:ll'6 ~ Ql Z · ...2 0 i:b (,::-~~.5 ..Ô ..W 0 0 :i...- ::Ö 'i:::~"0 (, a. = ""a.5 cõ 2 ta: i · ....0 0 \I .0 0 ïi ~0 0 "00-0 N .:.~0 ~...i .. ....co CD ~li:~ ..ui o 00 CO ..Ë e...Ol 'g 0-W c( 0 N Q)..gi 0 0 e...fl o Ql .i:-Gl ~u.~~Co It ::..a.'5 -:¡Ne.~~N- )(.".."i ~N ..:::s 0 OlW~"N Ol :i ~CO E C' 2 0 E fI Ol ..E ..i:ãì:i \I N l e Ol ~~~õ 0 0 CO ~..0 """0 õ)ë.0 ..u.~ :¡ E ..E e ..u.~CD 0 l â)0 §e.N 0 "0 fI ~ ~0 ¡¡-:'E Ol i:i: Ol s:CO 0 CO \I ~Q)~ Ol ~¡.!..u.:g E ~ (J ~Ol 0-0 2 .,~..N .()Ei:CO ¡j CO l §..:E 0 ~~ g ~ ..0 ~0 Q)0 -:0 e.~~g E ~"0 u.f E ~CO ()..0 0 ~i:~ 0 E E 0 CD ~N ..0 0 CD "0 .e ..-f ~~f -\I e..... ~ ..u.~:i e i:i2 ~â).e ~ :i .g CO ~N e.'E ..w l ~a C'e.Õ ¡¡:g ~â)ë 0 0 'E .. \I i:Ë N C'~ii 0 .. :i w ~.,co C'It ~:g ~:õ 0 Ô ~~s:~~N ê 0 i:E ~~Ol ~0 ~~ ~fI ~.. en u.E fñ !i QlfIE~N ë ~CD fI E CD .,..0 ~ CO ¿i:(,0 ..S Gl N f (,i2 i:0 Gl u.0 E ë ~8-~::u.Ol (,~0 .exGlu.f '2 ë N "C X " u.E 'E CD ~ fI co ::.,CO u.., 1 'E 0 w 0 Q)E æ N a.8 i:i:i:i: fI ~"C ~.,u.E ~ N Gl ~ W _fI E W Gl ën ~i:i:~.,0 CO ..~E t:en ..t:EGl"0 :g .e .eae-o w CD ~i:f 0 i:Ë E ~i.a Gl "C ~ë f ~"0 W g ~-0 .,0 fu.i:i:Q)\I .g C 0 ..i:N u.i:N 0(~w 0 ~0 f :i Q)u.e:\I i.i:.e 0 Ql Õ .i Q)Õ 0 "C i:" E l¿"C i:0 'ä f ui .2 c 'E \I 'E E E E "C ::CD e:¡¡..i:~l ~i:c ui "C 0 l ::u.CD ~u...~ï:w e i:è fI ¡~~fI ~f .e.e "C .: :t l¿w i:i:c i:.s ~a.a..s w ~:g 0 0 i 0 l ~l¿:a u.~"C ~:e ~~Õ "C '2 ii J "C ii .i ~~c i:CD i:.21 8 i:?l ~ "C ¿~S .g ~æ u.l-S W l-n:~0 CD .!3i $:e.e ()i:i:i:Q)-CD i:"i:"C CD\I Ü l .~~.2 0 i:at l i:g oc i:.2 c QI .2 i:i: S :i "C ~l!w \I S l!\I i:"E ::fI 0 '8 :i (Q (Q g;:!\I i:(;c 01 ë a.~::~ë 01 .2 ~ QI a.:t CD CD "C 0 l 'C ~IL l!e';:(J S i:..'5 :e IL CD ..CD E ~E Q)ë ~ II CD .."0 E CD .i -.i 01 i:(;~0 a.i:~0 c Q)"E a.~w :i 01 0 W :i :¡ IL ~th e i;i:::C;al i: W i:i:"E al al Q)e f \I ..E E E E .. ¡,1 ..::Q)::0 CD ::()CD (Q (Q 1 1 (Q .~Q) \I ~()e'E II e "0 '0 c 1i ei .0 ..~.8 'C 'C -i .c Ql Q)~e ".S i:i::.¡;CD E .2 E g g g g E-::u ~E i:~~::::"0 (,!::0 ::l3 0 âJ \I fI C Æ 0 i5 Q)~~~~CDziIzwu.()s:oc oc a..5 ii :::E :E Z iI :E .Ol Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E- 11 -08 Reading, ICIP Page 14 ii : i " t . ll ~ i i ~ IJ l l n : r ~ S : t i 5 = i- = . . . Ul I J . . . . .. . . Z .. ~ = Q Q C ~ ii ~ . . . ID A C O R P , I N C . Ex c e s s L i a b i l t y . E l M Ju l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 . J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 1 Su b J e c t M t l e s : Re c e i p t a n d s a t i s f a c t o r y r e v i e w o f t h e o r i g i n a l E l M E x c e s s G e n e r a l l i a b i l i t R e n e w a l A p p i i c a t i o n ( p a g e 7 s h o u l d r e a d A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 0 9 ) Un d e r l y i n g W o r k e r s ' C o m p e n s a t i n A p p i i c a t i o n St a t u s o f c o m p l i a n c e w i t h F E R C ' s C r i i c a l In f r a s t r u c t r e P r o t e c t i o n s t a n d a r d s Or i g i n a l s i g n e d T R I A l e t e r r e t u m e d b y J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 Pa y m e n t o f p r e m i u m b y J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0 Th i s p o l l e y i n c l u d e s $ 0 c o m m i s s i o n 10 6/ 2 8 / 2 0 1 0 .S E E A T T A C H E D " MARSH r: MARSH MERCER KROLL~ GUY CARPENTER OlVER WYMAN IDACORP, Inc: Dirers & Ofcers Liabilty Apnl21, 2010 to Apri 21, 2011 Policy Term iïílj~..'.V,,;:":' ~:.,~i~;E'" ';"";.:'Iibidíi' '; i""!$3'~iØt!(HfÖ( Retention: -Insg Agremet I(A) -Insunng Agreeent 1(B) Premium -Raed Preium incl TRA -Continuity Creit -Tota "~.. $35"OO;OO $0 $500,000 $0 $500,00 $713,250 $660,00 $64,167 5595,833 $128,246 5585,004* ~: -7.4%-$53,250 -$64,079 +$10,829 $18,857 -50% +1.09%$17,024 ....S#tÇtêtFit'.~~j.~rtfí,CQ~~.;~~..U_ot$35,_~ØO.. .; ElM (Energ Ins Mutual) ';;;fl~:i~t:.~il,~~i~y~r,:(ßt~, $115,000 585,000* Ace $15,00,00 $150,000 - $165,00 $15,000,000 $ 1,00,000* Chubb $95,00 * Additional limit for Independent Directors $15,00,00 $ 1,00,000* Travelers $63,750 * Additiona limit for Independet Dirrs ::'E~tl~~: $10,000 - $11,000 Estimated Premium onl Coverage is broader than Travelers with: . Side-A Fiduciar coverge included . A narw pnor notice exclusion "requires aceptance" . Conduct Exclusion trigger is naower referrg to a final adjudication in the underl . n action Like Chubb a ver solid form. . Offers $25k of Identity Fraud expense not offed b Chubb $6,333 $4,250 $8 million Full Coverage 515 mion Side A DlC - Travelers Alternate Pro ra $100,00,000 $1,285,004 $1,203,633 $81,371 Limits $100,00,000 Tota Prum 2009 $1,285,004 Tota Prum 2010 $1,246833Savings $38,171 JI'OI'_~. ~¡~ei,...~'n.~èl~~ * Non - admtt carrers (an additional 2.75% Idaho State Surplus Lines Tax I Fee Applies) .SEE ATTACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 16 . . . .AEGis Endorsements: Changes / Enhancements frm prior year Endorsmets atthed to the pri AEGIS policy . . 1. Employee Outide Position Covege - Not-For-Profit Orgaizations (Form 6525 i 0/200); as pe expiring Endorsment No. I 2. Ouide Postion Coverage - For-Profit Organtion Including Mangement or Operag Commttee (Form 6623 1012008), ODL Extension for the following. Replacng exirg Endorsemet NO.2: · Secty Offshore Insance, Ltd. (S.O.I.L..); · Alled Utility Network; · Maville Hydro Parer; · Hazltonlilson Joint Vennie; · Y -8 Hydro an Hermston Power Parerhip; · Bridge Coal Company; · I W On Percent LLC; · I W Energy Fund LLC; · Snow Mounta Hyd LLC; · Y-8 Hydr Parers · South Forks N; 3. Amende Deftion of Diror or Offcer - Section VI, Definitions (D) to include the Geera Counl, as pe expirng Endorsent No.3; 4. Clea Air Act Title IV and Title V Acid Rai Progr Designated Repreentative and Reponsible Ofcial Endorent Form 65 I I 512007 as pe expirg endormet No. 4; 5. Corprate Entity Secties Clai Endorsement (Crini. Form Admnistrtive and Regutory Prceegs, Coefendat)(Form 6627 9/200) With respect to the endorsment, Pendig and Pror Litigation Date - 4/2l/1990 - stad form replacing expiring endorsment No.5; 6. Amended Conduct Exclusion Endorsment (Manuscript) - Per expir Endorement NO.6A: 7. Amended Representations and Severability - Securties Clai Endorsment (Form 6573 111008) - stadad form replaing exirng Endorsment No.7; 8. Outside Position Coverge - Ouide For-Profit Orgation Including Management or Opatig Commttees (Scheduled Perns and Positions)(Form 6622 10/2008)- Extion proided for: · Laont Kee - Securty Ofshore Insance Ltd. · Richards Riazi - Alled Utility Netork As pre expir Endorsment No.8; 9. Amended Exclusion (K)(l) Insd vs. Insur Whtleblower (Form 66125/2007)- SOX Whtleblower care-back, as per expiring Endorsent NO.9. 10. Insurd vs. Insu Amnded Endorsement (Banptcy Examner, Crtor Committe) (Form 6648 7/2008) - as per expir Endorsement No. 10 11. Amended Definition (A)(2) Application Endorsment (Form 6636 7/2008)-rech-back amended to be one ye from the year last year and five in the policy - as pe expirg Endorsment No. i i; but with a one year look back; 12. Amended Pror Notice Exclusion Endorsement (Manuscript), removes GPL clause, as per expirg Endorsent No. 12.; 13. Pulic Ofering Endorsement (Form 6630 8/2007) - Claifes coverge under Section ii & 12 of the Secties Act ofI933, as per expirg Endorsemnt No. 13. 14. Amnded Definition of Clai Endorsment (Manuscrpt)-ands defition of Clai to provde coverge for "Wells Notice", as pe expirg Endorsemen No. 14 15. Amended Subrogation Endorement (Manuscript)-surogation claue wil be amended to be consistnt with the conduct exclusion, as per exirg Endorsement No. 15A; 16. Non-Cacellation Endorsement-Manuscpt-Policyis non-ecellable by ins except for non-payment of preum and (b) cacellable by th insued on a pro-rata basis at any time-Replaces expirng Endorsment No. 16 17. Amended Exclusion (E)(6) (Form 6654) - deletes exclusion E(6) peaig to injur aring out of piracy, plagiarm, etc.- as per expiring Endorsement No. 17 i 8 Amended Acquisition, Merger and Dissolution Endorseent (20% Consideration Theshold) Form 6586-New JlXnlDin",o. ""u:.SEE ATTACHED" IPC-E- 11 -OS Reading, ICIP Page 17 19. Member with Votng Righ Endorst (For 6583 11007), as per expirg Endorsent No. 18 20. Terrism Limits and TRRA of 2007 Endorsement (Fonn 6639 112008): AEGIS hereby offers to provide the above-naed applicat insurce coverge for an "insured . loss" relting frm an "act ofteorisi" eah as defed by the Terrism Risk Inur Act as amnded (the "Federal Act"), on the same ten an in the same amunts as loss caued by other events cover by your policy. (Ech of these balded te is defined by the Federal Act those defiitions contrl our grant of coverage uner your policy). Pleae rea this offer cafuly. ElM Exces Commenta -Ba on update quot of 4-2010 . Policy Following Fonn Excess Dictrs & Ofce Indem Policy Fonn Rev. 01101106, as expiring . The ElM excess Policy For is bein reed as pe th expirng te at the prum noted above, including the below endorsent. 1. Prior & Pending Litigation-as per exng Endorsmet No. 5 2. Non-Cancelable excet for Non-Payment -a per expig Endorsent No. 1 3. Terorism - Certfied Act-as pe exiring Endorsement No.6 . Coverage for "Acts of Terrism" as defned in the Terrism Risk Insurce Act of2002, including snbsequent acts of Congrss puuat to the Act, is included in your expiring policy. You should know that, effective Novemb 26, 2002, under your existing coverge, any losses caus by Cerfied Act of Terrsm could be parally reimbured by the United Staes under a fonnula eslihed by federal law. The additional anual premium to provide renewal coverge for acts ofterrism is $10,510 which is included in the preium stted above. You may elect to have coverge excluded for losses arsig frm acts of terrorism in accordce with the Terrism Risk Inse Act of2002 and subsequent extions. Attched is a let which you ar reuied to sign either accepti or rejectig the coverge for "Act of Terorism" (spimens atthed). The decision to accept or reect "Acts of Terrrism" coverae must be made by April 21, 2010. 4. Policies Followed-Per wording in expirg Endorsement No. 4- . ElM will ag to follow fonn AEGIS's Quote let date April 8, 20 i 0 including only endorsement numers: i, 2 (except pagrh 6),3,4,5,6,7,8 (except pargrh 6),9,10,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17& 18. . ElM will not follow enrsmet num: 19 & 20. . With respec to underlying sub limts, ElM only follows for to the extet it affects the ElM attchment point. . 5. Amnd Definition of Cla - as per expirng Endorsent No.2 6. Amend Notice of Clam - as pe expirig Endorsement NO.3 7. Treatment ofPaynnts Side A - as per exirig Endorsement No.7 8. Have ageed to follow the AEGIS 20010 acquisition theshold & 12 month look back for definition of application (need amended ElM quote confng this) Received Travelers Side-A DIC Coverage only . Idao Cancellation for Nonpayment of Preium . Identity Fraud Expnse Reimburent Endorsement ($25k sub limit) . Addition of Order of Paymts . Amend Severbilty of Exclusions . Amend Definition of Loss and Fraud and Persnal Profit Exclusion for Section 15 Claims . How to Reprt Losses, Claims, or Potetial Claims to Travelers . Imprtt Notice Indepndet Agent and Broker Compensation . Terrorism Policy Disclosure Notice-Terorsm Rik Insurace Act of 2002 . Cap on Losse From Cerfied Acts of Terrris Subieetiities: . AEGIS: None . ElM: 1. Copy of undelyig bin 2. Prmium payment due by incetion (412/2010) . Traveler: i. Underlying policy binder "SEE ATTACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page is . .c Calñ Branc 777 S. Figuer, 14th Flor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 689-2733 Fax (213) 689-188 Date: August 17, 2010 From: Kate Rooker To: Steve Mikhlin Company: MARSH AVIATION Fax Number: programmedCHARTIS GOLD MEDALLION AIRCRAFT INSURANCE BINDER The Coeraes are bound per the ters, conditons, and endorsen of our quot of 08112/10 Named Insure: Idaho Pow Company And Idacorp, Inc. Address: Polic#: Policy Peri: Covge A:CovB: CovgeC: CogeD:CoraE: Coverage F: . CovraG: CovergeH: Covera I:CovJ:CoK: CoveL:COYeM: P.O. Bo 70 Bois. ID 83707GM 0039274- a renewal of poliey: GM 5393274-08 Fro: Augu 26, 2010 Untl: August 26,2011 bot at 12:01 AM stndar time. at the address show above. $ 300,000,00 Each Ocurrce $ 300,00,00 Each Ocrrnc Maximum Se: Reporg Gr Period: 0 Grace Days $ 10,00,000 Each Occurrnc Repng Gr Per: 0 Grace Days $ 10.00,000 Each Occurce $ 300,000,000 Each Ocurrce $ 100,000 Any 1 Fir $ 25,000.00 Each Aircft - Au $ 25,000,000 Each Ocrrce$ NlA Deuctle $ 2,500,000 Ea Ocrrce $ 300,00,000 Each Ocurnce $ 30,000,000 Each Ocurrnce $ 25,00,00 Eah OfseAggrega $ 50,000 Ea Occurrnce$ NlA Deuctle $ 25,000 Ea Pax A. $ 50,000 Each Ocurrce (Sceduled: Eac Non-re Mebe) A. $ 500,00 Each OCnc (Scheduled: Each Cre Member) B. $ 50,00 Eac Ocrrnc (NOrremp.: Eac NoCr Member) B. $ 50,00 Each Occur (NOrremp.: Each Cr Member) 5,000,000 Totl None Aiaft 1,250 Eac Panng 104 cotie weeks 45 Weekly Indem Indam PerodC-N: DeduetleFAACert.Yea sets No in In MoNumberBuRtMak & Modl Crl Pas Insu Value Moton InoestinN521TM199Cessa Cin 550 2 r 8 $1750.00 NIL INIL Covge 0: CoveraP: CovQ:CovR: CovrageS: CovrageT:CogeU: Covge V:CovW: Covege X: . $ 5,000,000 Each Ocur$ N/A Deucle $ 10,00,000 Eac Ocurrce Maxum Seat: 30 Report Grace Peri: 30 Grace Days $ 5,000,000 Any One Airft $ 500,000 Ea Los Minimum reuir repair paod: 0 $ 50,00 Eac day, no mo thn 60 consecve da no exceing: $ 60,00 Eac Los Minimum reuire repair perod: 0 $ 2,00,000 Each Loss $ 2,00,00 Ea Los $ 25,000 Each Pasng and Cre6S % if th airft 15 or more consee days $ 50,000 Each Occce (Sculed: Each PAX) $ 50,00 Each Ocrrce (Scedule: Eac Cr) $ 50,000 Each Ocurrce (Noned: Each PAX $ 50,000 Eac OCurrce (Non-0ned: Eac Cr)$ 50,00 Ea Pers (Premis) $ 50,000 Eac Ocrrnce (Premise) "SEE ATTACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-OS Reading, ICIP Page 19 Pilo Warrnt: As Repe All Dual Cr AI Na Pilot: Ric Johns, Ian Bo Je Ple or:Al ~ cr asll by 1h.. ii . It is Ju ni th al pi wh II or me II op pilo.. mu ha $U eø a moOß sim_ tr c: sp de fa 1h _ an mø alr ci wltn 1h pn Tw (12) in of any an all fllg -" by Ih poic, anll ti. Tot Aircra Premium $50,1 Mexican ceca: Includ at no Cha War Hull: N521TM - $298. War Liabilit N521TM - $2423, TRI: N521TM: HuU - $0. UabiBty - $159, Proucer Coissio is 0.00"0 Issuing Company: National Unio Fire Insuce Company of P"itburgh. PA Policy Form: GLD-Endme: UE86 MEX Waring, UE1013 Policylder No,UE2000A Dat Recnit Exclsion Cluse, UE2001A Dat Recniton Lite Covere Clus. UE857 Tria Hull, UE858 Tria Llabi, GLD426 War Hull (Ste Speci where reuire). GLD52E War Usilit (Sta Spe where reuire). GLD881 - Incidentl Medicl Malpractice UabillEndorsment, GLD937 - Chart Re Libi. GLD834 - Knowedge of Ocrrce and Failure to Report, . , . . . , Any Apficable St, Pral, or Terr Enrsens and/or Not, UE1066 Terrori exclusion - certed Acts, UE3B Nuclear Exn (st Sp wher reuire), UE46 Nois Exclusion, UE48B War Exclusion (State Specic where reuire), UE882 Ases Exclusi o . cav: This binde coins a bro outline of coerge and do no Includ aU th te, codllns and exusons of th polle (or pofici) th may be is to yo. The po (or po) contin the full an comple agreent wit reard to coere. Plea revi the poficy (or poic) thghl wi ~ur brr upo reipt and not lI promptl in Wlling If ~u hav any qus. In th ev of any incnscy been th bind and th po, th poley language shall co unle the partes agre to an amndmen. The Eur Unio is dene by thos contes wh 81 boun by RÊÌulatin (Ee) 785004 of th Europen Pai1lamen an of the col of Z1 Aprl 20. ToI Premiums do no Inde any apicabl stte andor municipalta. TRIA Covra ha ben Acptd . per yor Inscton. Total Annual Premium:$50,164 /út~Signature of Auor Resenve: I~- 'SEE ATTACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-l 1 -08 Reading, ICIP Page 20 . . . . + AEGISo Insurance Service BINDER June 20, 2011 NAMEDINSURED: ADDRESS: Wesern Interconnected Elecc Systems (WIES) CLO Marsh USA, Inc. 111 Southwest Columbia Suite 500 Portand, OR 97201 Re: Exces Liabilit Insurance CLAIMS-FIRST-MADE Policy Assocated Elecric & Gas Insurance Services Limited hereby agree to provide coverage under Policy No. X0676A 1A 11 for the POLICY PERIOD frm the 1 st day of June, 2011 until the 1 st day of June, 2012, both days at 12:01 A.M., Standard Time, at the address of the NAMED INSURED. 1) Premium $415,052 Terrorism $37,948 Commission $40,000 Policy Premium $493,000 2) 3) RETROACTIVE DATE: The 1 st day of June, 1998 at 12:01 A.M. Standard Time at the addre of the NAMED INSURED. A. B.c. D. E. F. G. LIMIT OF LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE: 1. $9,000,000'" 2. $18,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE JOINT VENTURE LIMIT OF LIABILITY: Per Limit of Liabilit Section I.(B)(9)' COMBINED PRODUCTS LIABILITY AND COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY AGGREGATE LIMIT OF LIABILITY FOR THE POLICY PERIOD: $9,000,000" FAILURE TO SUPPLY LIABILITY AGGREGATE LIMIT OF LIABILITY FOR THE POLICY PERIOD: $9,00,000" POLLUTION LIABILITY AGGREGATE LIMIT OF LIABILITY FOR THE POLICY PERIOD: $9,000,000 MEDICAL MAPRACTICE INJURY LIMIT OF LIABILITY EACH OCCURENCE: $9,000,000. WILD FIRE LIABILITY AGGREGATE LIMIT OF LIABILITY FOR THE POLICY PERIOD: $9,000,000 '" '" SUBJECT TO THE $18,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE OF THE POLICY 4) EXCLUSIONS: As per AEGIS POLICY form. 'SEE ATIACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP Page 21 1 Meadowands Plaz East Rutnord, NJ 07073 Telepon 201508-260 Facsile 2018939 AEGIS and th AEGIS Logo are Reister Seric Mar of Assoat Elecc & Gas Insurace Serces Limit 8000 BIND11 (01/2011) BINDER 5) UNDERLYING LIMITS: A. See Underlying Limit SChedule. B. $1,000,000 anyone occurrnce not covered by underlying insurance. C. In the event of any CLAIM (s) arising fr any single OCCURRENCE which involve(s) two or more UNDERLYING LIMITS, the UNDERLYING LIMITS shall apply in Cobination. 6) Endorsments: The following endorements anor exclusions will also be ated to th policy. 1. Nuclear Energy Liabilit Exclusion (Brod Form), Form No. 10o-E8202 (1/88) 2. Employment Practices Liabilit Endorsment, Form NO.1 Oo-E8262 (3/11) 3. Employment Prctice liabilty Exclusion, Form No. 1OO-E8264 (6/06) 4. Autmobile Liabilit Exclusion, Form No. 100-E8231 (1/92) 5. Definition (S) Amendatory Endorsement, Form No. 10o-Moo01 (10/00) as per expiring Endt. No. 5 6. Secton II Definitions Endorement, Form No. 100-Moo01 (10/00) 7. Failure to Supply Exclusion Amendatory Endorsement, Form No. 100-M0001 (10/00) as per expiring Endt. No. 7 8. Additional Exclusion Endorsment, Form No. 1oo-Moo01 (10/00) 9. Condition (P) Endorsement, Form No. 10Q-Moo01 (10100) as per expiring Endt. NO.9 10. Definition (l) Endorsment, Form No. 10o-MOO01 (10/00) as per expiring Endt. No. 10B 11. Shared Limit Endorsement, Form No. 100-M0001 (10/00) 12. Limitation of Liabilit Endorsement, For No. 1üOMOOO1 (10100) 13. Member with Voting Right Endorsment, Form No. 10o-E8402 (1/07) 14. Terrsm Limit and TRIPRA of 2007 Endorsment, Form No. 10ûE8409 (1/11) 7) Membership and Votinq Sttus: This POLICY wil entitle the NAMED INSURED to be a member in the COMPANY unless that membership is supersed, at any point in time, by a parent or affliated company, which is also a member in the COMPANY. This POLICY wil also entile the NAMED INSURED to a vote on any matter submitted to the members of the COMPANY unless that voting right is superseded, at any point in time, by the voting right of a parent or affliated company. 8) Terrism Coverage: TRIPRA of 2007 (U.S. loctions Only) Terrorism Risk Insurance Proram Reauthorzation Act of 2007 (TRIPRA) exends the program for seven years. It eliminates the distinction between foreign and domestic act of terrorism while maintaining the current federal share (85%) and the insurer co-pay (15%) above the insurets retention. It hardens the cap on all insurers' aggregate liabilty at $100 billon. Currently, it does not require insurers to ofer coverage for nuclear, biologica, chemical and radiological risks (NBCR). In addition, the bil maintains the currnt program trigger of $100 millon and the mandatory recopment layer of $27.5 bilion for federal payment, specifing recupment timefrmes. The Act requires that 133% of federal outays be recovered through policyolder surcharges. Finally, it provides for several studies of insurance availabilit/afrdability for NBCR risks and for terrrism market capaity. AEGIS wil continue to provide terronsm coverage for the policyholder as it has since the original bil was enacted Page 2 of3 BINDER in 2002. Further note that any terrrism coverae provided under th AEGIS Excess Liabilty Policy is subject to the $18,000,00 General Agreate of the POLICY. Attched is an invoice for the PREMIUM listed above, which is payable wiin 15 days of the date heref, or 20 days fro the incetion date abve, whichever is later. A POLICY reflecing the above terms will be prepared and sent to you shortly. The policy provides coverage which is different from that provided by most other policies. . . "SEE ATIACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-II-08 Reading, ICIP Page 22 . . . . THIS BINDER SUPERSEDES ANY PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BINDER. AEGIS Insurance Service, Inc. 1geprsentatlve Page 3 of3 &AEGIS'O Associated Electic & Gas Insurance Servces Limited Hamilton, Bermuda June 20, 2011 WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM FOREIGN INSURER REQUIRED BY REVENUE PROCEDURE 81-21 Insurer: Asocated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited Maxwll Robert Building 4th Floor One Church Street P.O. Box HM2455 Hamiltn, HMJX BERMUDA Premium Period: June 1,2011 to June 1,2012 The Internal Revenue Servce ("IRS") has issue Revenue Procedure 81~21, which states that direc insureds and U.S. brokers wil be exempt fr liabilit for any unpaid Federal Insurance Excise Tax ("FET")impoed by secton 4371 of the Internal Revenue Code on underwng premiums if they receve a statement from a foregn insurer to the ef that the premiums they pay are subject to U.S. income tax and concomitantly exempt fro FET. This statement wil serve as the statement prescribed by the IRS to establish the FET exemption. AEGIS has received a prvate ruling frm th Internal Revenue Service to the effec that it is engaged in a U.S. trde or business and underwing profits atbutable to premiums paid to It will be subject to income ta. The ruling also provides that such premiums are exempt frm the FET. This is to advise you that all premiums paid by you to AEGIS with respec to the captioned premium period wil constite an Item of effectvely conneced incme to AEGIS and thus are exempt from FET. ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED John J. Denman Jr. Treasurer and Contrller Maxwll Robe Building, 4th floor, One Churc St, P.O. Box HM2455, Hamilton HM Jx, Bermuda 441292131 AEGIS and th AEGIS Logo ar Registre Sece Mark of Assoiate Elecc & Gas Insurance Serices Limited 800 FETl (0312007) -YAEGIS ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED UNDERLYING LIMITS SCHEDULE This schedule is atched to and forms a part of Item 6 of the Declarations of POLICY No. X0676A 1 A 11 and lists all underiying insurance or self-insured retentions maintained by the NAMED INSURED effecve this 1st day of June, 2011 at 12:01 A.M. Standard Time at the address of the NAMED INSURED.Insured or Uninsured $1,000,000 anyone OCCURRENCE - Geneal Liabilit "SEE ATTACHED"Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E- II-OS Reading, ICIP Page 23 .. MARSH & McLENNAN~COMPANIES IDACORP,INC. FIDUCIY LIILITY JULY 15,2011 TO JULY 15,2012 POLlCY TERM . INSURER AEGIS EXPIRIG AEGIS RENEWAL POLlCYFORM AEGIS POllCY FORM 2100 AEGIS POLICY FORM 2100 (91200)(9/200) PRY LIMI $25,00,00 $25,00,000 meR/DEeR RETENTION: -EANATUL PERSON $0 $0 -AoGREGA TE FOR ALL NATUL PERNS $0 $0 -AGGREGATE FOR SPONSO ORG AN ALL EMPLYEE $200,00 $200,00 BENFI PROGRAS wI REPEC TO EA WRONGFU ACT $500,000 $500,000 -$1,00,000 AGGREGATE FOR AN CLAIM IN WHLE OR IN PART RETED TO CoMPAN'S SECRIIES PREMI -PRMI INCL TR $139,650*$136,159*-2.5% (INCLUDES 2% FOR TRIA)(.ILUDES 2% FOR TRIA) .~,li~,O..::~.L$i.__.~ÓF$25.",.O" .. . ...,' ..... "' ...d'.n. ....::......:; FEDERAL INs Co (CHBB)I $32,250 I $31,445 I -2.5% t'oirÂt.Pi~.~:.......... ".. '.'." .'.......... d ...:" "".'.":', ';'y "".'" ......' 535000.000 $17l.00 $167.604 I -2.5% ENDRSEME:1.Exclusion (C) is amended to provide a cae back for certai fies and pealties.Coverge is provided at a Sub Limit of $5 Milion which is pa of the overa policy aggregate-as per expirng endt # 1; 2.Exclusion (B) is amendd to provide a cae back to the BIIPD and PI exclusion for claim resulting frm the selection of any Mange Cae Service Prvider or denal or delay of any benefit unr a healthcar plan as pe expirg endt # 2; 3.Amend defiition of claim to include investigaons by the DOL and PBGC-as per expirng endt #3; 4.Amend defiition ofinsur enrsnt, Trutee to include only "natu pern" trs. Th elimintes issue ofIdacorp's lit being eroded to outide corporate trsteas pe expirg endt #4 & # 14 5.Discovery penod endorsement at 125% of the anua preum. Electon res bilateral, as per expirg endt #5, but with change to standard form 6.Seurties Deuctible Endorsment - $500,000 in the agggate for any Clai in whole or in pa related to the IDACORP's Securties, as per expirg endt #6; 7.llP A extension endrsement provides coverge for violations of llPA-as per exirg endt #7; 8.Deletion of reverion of assets exclusion-as pe expirg endt #8; 9.Notice of Claim or Cirtaces Endorsent to "notice of ri mager or general counl", as per expirg endorsement No.9; 10. Puntive Daages-Most Favorable Venue Endt-as per expirng endt #10 i 1. FEB Exclusion (G) Endt-addse benefits due exclusion, as per expirg endt # i i 12. Acquiition, Merger and Termion Endt-amended to provide (a) 25% aset thhold and (b) pre-acquisition coverge for created and acqui subsidiaes (c) automatic coverge for crte pla, as per expirg endt#12 13. Order of Payments Endt , as pe expir endt # 13 14. Amended Cancellation Endt-cancellation amended to be non-cancellable by the Company except for non-payment of preum I cacellable by the Insur on a pro-rata basis, as per expirg endt # 15 iS. Amende Defition of Sponsor Orgtion-Defiition (P) Sponsr Orl!tion Amended to include the "resultiii debtor in pOssession or Exhibit No. 305 . "SEE ATTACHED"IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 24 . . . equivalent statu outside the United States", as per exping ent #16 16. Amended Exclusion (D)(I) - Pror notice exclusion wil only apply with repect to a Fiduciar policy, as pe expirg ent #17 17. Amended Condition (A) Endt-Act, Omissions or Warties is amended to indicate the Policy is non-rescindable with respect to Natu Persn Insurds only, as per expirng eOOt #18 18. Deleton of Exclusion J, deletes known cirumstances liely to give nse to a Clai not disclosed or misrereente in the Log Fonn Applicaon (exclusion does not apply to Renewal Applications), as per expirg endt #19. 19. Amended Non-Duplication of Limits Endorsement (mauscnpt) to not allow wordin to apply to the AEGIS D&O limits, as per expirg ent #20. 20. Memr I Voting Rights Endorsemt-as per expirg endt #21 Policy also entitles the Sponsor Organition to a vote on any matter submitt to the members of the Insure; as pe expirg end # 12 21. Optina: Terronsm Limits and TRIEA Endorsement AEGIS herby offers to provide the above-named aplicant insurce coverge for an "inured loss" reultig frm an "act ofterrnsm," eah as defied by the Terrrim Rik Insurce Act, as amended (the "Fedral Act), on the same terms and in the same amounts as loss caus by other events coverd by your policy. (Each of these bolded te is dermed by the Feder Act; those definitions control our grant of coverage under your policy). Pleae read ths offer carfuly (se AEGIS quote for fu tenn) EndorsementsIonn Attched To The Chubb 1.10-02-1 295-Importt Notice To Policyholders (6/07 ed.)-a expiringExcess Policy:2.14-2-1304Pendig Or Pror Matter Follow Fonn (4/07 ed.) -as per Expirg endt #1 3.14-02-13045-Termnaton Follow Form (4/07 ed.) as per expinng endt #2 4.14-o2-13438-Aind Insurng Claus & Depletion of Underlyig LimitsSecton Endt (9/08 ed.) as per expirg endt #3 5.14-2-8034- Not Follow Form of Terrnsm Exclusion (0510300) as pe expirg EOOt #4 6.14-2-9228-Compliance With Applicable Trae Sanction Laws(4/04 00.), as pe expirg eOOt #5 7.14-o2-9963-Reliance Endorsement (12/05 ed) as per expirg endt #6 *NON-ADMITED CARRERSAN ADDITIONAL 1.75%% IDAHO STATE SURLUS LINES T AXE APPLIES Comments regding key changes to the AEGIS primary fiduciary coverage: · Al cover under the AEGIS policy is in acrdace with the expinng policy form Chubb Exces Fiduciry Coverage Comments: · All coverae under the Chubb policy is in acrdance with the expir policy form Subiedvies: · AEGIS: None . Chubb: · Underlying binder, pnor to binding · Underlyig policy, when available "SEE ATIACHEO" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 25 .. MARSH&MclENNAN~ COMPANIES INSURER IDACORP,lNC.COMMCI CR JULY 15.2011 TO JULY 15,2012 Poucy TERM FEER IN Co (CI) FEDERA INs Co (CHB)EXPIRG RENEAL INCRASEIDECRE . PRARY LIMIT -EMPYE THEFT -PRMISES -IN TRNSIT -FORGERY -COMPUT FRUD -Fus TRAFE FRAUD -MONEY ORERS & COUNRFIT FRUD -CRIT CARD FRUD -CIE COVERAGE -EXPNSE COVERAGE RETENTON: PREIUM $25,00,000 $25,00,00 $25,00,00 $25,00,000 $25,00,000 $100,000 $100,00 $25,00,00 $25,00,00 $250,00 $100,00 $5,00 FO Fu TRANSFE & CREDIT CAR FRAUD $25,000,00 $25,000,000 $25,00,000 $25,000,000 $25,00,000 $100,000 $100,00 $25,00,000 $25,00,00 $25000 $100,00 $1,00 FOR Fus TRNSfER & CREDIT CARD FRAUD $6,00 -4% N/A N/A 562,50 SAVIGS ENORSEMENS/FORMS: $1,500 Geer Tem & Conditions 1. 14-2-7302 (Ed. 11/202) Policy FoOD Geera Tem & Conditionsas exp 2. 10-02- 1295 (Ed 6/2007) Imprtt Notice to Policyholde exp 3. 14-.14672 (0912008)-Terminaton of Policy Endorsemet as per exp #1 4. 14--746 (111200) Ida Amendatory Endt. Wordg is as per ex endt #! 5. 14-2-7993-( 11/2007) Notice of Loss Contrl Serce as per exp 6. 14-2-9228-(21010) Compliace with Applicable Trae Sacton Laws. Crime Covere Section 1. 14-2-7307 (Ed. 1112002)Policy FoOD Crme Setion-As Exp 2. 14-2- 1023-Amed Rettion for Speific Insng Clausas per exp endt # I. 3. 14-02-10685 (Ed 3/2005) Amnd Definition of Employee as per exp ent #! 4. 14-2-10894 (04/2008) Amend Denition of Exective Endt-as per exp endt #3 5. 14-2-13658 (04/2008) Pension Protecion Act Enhancemt Endt-as pe exp endt #4 6. 14-2-7402-(1012002) Amend Definition of Employee Endt-a pe exp endt #5 7. 14-02-8592 (7/2005) Conversion to Loss Discvered Endt-a per exp endt #6 8. 14-2-8754 (81003)Delete Exclusion 17 Endt-as pe expirig endt in 9. 14-2-8850 (10/2003) Joint Venture Endt-as per ex endorsement #8 10. 14-2-8907 (101200) -Amed Exclusion 19 Endt - Covere do not apply if such loss is cover under a reewal or relacment policy offd by Chubb as per exp endt #9. Ii. 14-02-8923- (4/2007) Amend Subsecon 23 Changes in Expore Endt - to increase the rertg time fr frm 60 days to 90 daysas pe exp endt #10 12. 14-2-8924 (i 1/2003) Amend Subon 25 Limits of Liabilty and Retetion EOOt-as per exp endt #11 13. 14-2-8925 (11/2003) Amnd Valuation of Securities Endt-as pe exp endt #12 14. 14-2-8926 (1112003) Amed Exclusions Endt-as per exp endt #13 15. 14-2-8927(1112003) Amd Exclusion Endt-as per exp endt #14 16. 14-02-8928 (1112003) Amed Exclusion Endt-as per exp endt #15 17. 14-02-8931 A (4I08)-Amd Definition of Employee Endt- as pe ex endt #16 18. 14-2-8932 (1 112003) Amd Definition of Secties Endt-as pe ex endt #17 19. 14-02-8933 (1112003)-Amend Money Ord and Counteeit Curreny Fraud Endt as per exp endt #18 20. 14-02-9146 (212004) Amend Exclusion 12(h)(ii) Endorsement - as per exp endt #19 21. 14-02-9261 (4/200) Amend Definition of Coter Syste Endt-as per exp endt 20 22. 14-02-9461 (71200) Amend Defnition of Diovery and Exclusion 13b as per expiring endt21 . Crime Coverae Summary: The Chubb policy form is as expirng . The 2011 strtegy wa to reew at a fl or bett prum given tht thir reention and pricing re below maet. Chubb has ag to a 4% reduction. Subjectities: None .SEE ATIACHED" Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 26 . .4t saif 'eP corpation IDAHO POWER COMPANY Premium estimate for Guaranteed Cost Plan Period: 04/01/2011 - 04/01/2012 Policy: 2598 Plan: 1 Class Description Payroll Rate Premium "7539 .8810 Elee Power Co-Noc-AlI Emps & Or Offce Clerical $102,517 $70 $3,755,195 - 2.73 $46,422 - .15 Total Payroll €.J $3,801,617 Manual Premium Expenence Rating Modification Standard Premium x - $102/586 .92 $94,380 Premium Discount Discounted Premium $12.907 $81,473.Terrorism Premium Catastrophe Premium DCBS Premium Assessment (9 6.4%--~ Total Premiums and Asesments + + + $380 $380 -'$5,263 $87,496 .. Premium discount schedule First $3,500 0.0% Next $14,500 10.0% Next $82,000 15.0% Over $100,000 16.5% "-.. Terrorism premium =: total payrll /100 x .01 Catastrophe premium = total payroll /100 x .01 Premium and rating factors wil change on your anniversary rating date to those in effect at that time. Your policy premium is based on your current estimated premium and may be prorated for policies issued for less than a full year or adjusted based on actual payroll by classification. . Policy _PrLPakeLPrEst c.W~AcM IPC-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 27 "SEE ATTACHED" Ul(1 :¿nmtn REQUEST FOR PRODUCTlON NO. 18: Refernce Direct Testimony of Scott . Spark, p. 39, lines 15-20. Please provie the insurance claims for Company-owned equipment associated with the facilties charge filed by the Company for each year for the years 1987 through 2010, organiz by rate Schedule. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18: There are technically no "insurance" claims rearding this equipment as any loss during that time frame fell within the self-insure deductble range. However, Idaho Power pays for any such losses direly (wiout any insurance revery). Idaho Powets currnt standard property insurance deductible (i.e., se-insure) is one million dollars per loss. The respnse to this Request was prepared by Tim Tucker, Properl and Casualt Administrr, Idaho Power Company, at the direction of Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consulttin with Jason B. Willams, Corporae Counsel, Idaho Power Company.. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPOSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POER - 19 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-ii-08 Reading, ICIP Page 28 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 53: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 15 (stating "virtually all 'insure' propert losses occning beyond the Company's point of delivery would fall under Idaho Power's self-insure propert retention (deductible) and would be an expense incurred directy by the Company"). Please explain how the Company recovers costs associated with its "self-insured propert retention." (a) Does the Company rever such self-insured amounts through rates? (b) How would the Company pass on its uninsured losses to customers? For example, please descrbe the ratemaking treatment of an uninsured failure of a piece of distributin equipment on the Company's side of the meter that fails prior to expiration of its depreiation schedule. (c) Has the Company ever implemented similar treatment for a piece of distribution equipment beyond the point of delivery. Please explain what prevents the Company frm treting uninsured facilities charge distribution equipment diferent from uninsure distribution equipmen not subject to the facilites charge. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 53: (a) Yes. The Company reovers costs associated wlth self-insured amounts through Commission-apprved ratemaking processes. Self-insure amounts (costs fallng below the Company's self-insured minimums) paid by the Company are booked as expense and included in custmer rates in the same manner that other Company expenses are recovere. (b) When distribution equipment fails on the Company's side of the meter, it is retire and a new piece of equipment is installed and begins depreciating. Any IDAHO POWER COMPANS RESPONSE TO THE SIXH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -15 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-ØS Reading, ICIP Page 29 adjustment in deprecitin rates resulting frm eart failure or rerements is reected in the Company's next depreation study. Depreiation studies are done on five-year . cycles. Depreciation expenses are revere through customers' rates because this equipment is used to serve multiple customers and is not solely dedicated to one customer, which is the case for equipment subject to the facilities charge. Notably, the example provided for in this Request does not represent a loss for insurance purposes. (c) Yes. The Company treats replacement of equipment failure for distribution equipment beyond the Company's point of deUvery in a similar manner by adjusting customers' facilties charges to reflect the cost of replacing failed equipment. The Company has not and does not intend to trat self-insured facilites charge equipment diferently from self-insured distrbution equipment not subject to the facilties charge. Th response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior . Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wih Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -16 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E- 11-08 Reading, ICIP Page 30 . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 58: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 24(c). Does the Company's investment in distribution facilities installed beyond the point of delivery (or the depreciated value thereof) remain anywere in the Company's revenue reuirement if the equipment expires prior to its 31-year depreciatin schedule? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 58: No. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst. Idaho Power Company. in consulttion with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPNSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 25 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 31 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 70: Please admit or deny that in meetings . wih representatives of the ICIP in the fall and winter of 2010 regarding the facilities charge, Idaho Power representatives stated that the reason the Company does not apply a depreciation schedule to the initial investent in facilities charge equipment is that Idaho Power takes on the risk that it will have to replace a piec of failed equipment prior to expiration of its depreciation schedule. Please also admit or deny that Idaho Powe stated that its insurance polic would not cover replacement of such equipment. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 70: The Company objec to the form of the question as it is not a proper form of producion request per the Commission's rules. Notwthstnding, Idaho Powr asserts that it use a levelized 31- year straight-line depreciation schedule for the Company's inital investent in facilities charge equipment. Idaho Power further asserts that under th Commission-approved facilities charge provisions, the Company wil replace a failed piec of equipment prior . to expiration of its depreciation scedule without fully recvering the cost of the failed piece of equipment. Morever, the Company's insurance policy does not apply to replacement of pieces of equipment that faU prior to expiration of their expeed useful life as these are not considered insurable losses. This was further discussed in the Company's responses to ICIP's Request Nos. 15 and 16. The reponse to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -11 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 32 . .. . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 73: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 58. Please confinn that the Company would recover the uninsured costs of such equipment failing prior to expiration of its 31-year depreiation schedule in the manner discussed in the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 53. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 73: If a piece of equipment under a facilites charge failed pnor to expiration of its 31-year depreciation schedule and was included in the Company's test year base rates, then recovery of the uninsured costs of the failed equipment would occur through customets rates as described in the Company's Response to ICIP's Request No. 53. However, if the piece of equipment failed outside of a test year, then the Company would not recover the full cost of the equipment, as is the case for all of the Company's distribution equipment. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 28th day of September 2011. ~~C2=a A N B. WILLIAMS omey for Idaho Power Company ." IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -14 Exhibit No. 305 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 33 . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 INDUSTRIL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY ExmBIT NO. 306 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request Nos. 19,20, 57, and 72 Regarding Customer Consent to the Facilities Charge EXHIBIT No.3J0TcI.~.. .REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: Reference Direct Testimony of Scott Sparks, p. 35, line 7 (stating, "At the option of the Compay, facilities charges may be offre. . . .). Is the facilities charge optional for Schedule 19 customers, or does the Company choose whether any facilities beyond the point of delivry will be owned by th Company? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: As stated in the Company's tari, faciltis charges provisions are offered at the option of the Company. When servce is firs establishe. Schedule 19 customers are expected to provide facilities beyond the point of delivery. However, if reuested by the customer, Idaho Power may offer to own, operate, and maintain such facilities which, if ofered and accepte. require a facilties charg that is no optional to the customer. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior . Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wi Jason B. Willams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. .IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POER - 20 Exhibit No. 306 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCOON NO. 20: Refernce the Schedule 19 Tanf. (a) Please admit or deny that the Schule 19 Tari states: At the option of the Company, transformers and other facilties instlled beyond the Point of Delivery to provided Pnmary or Transmission Servce may be owed, operated, and maintained by the Company in consideraion of the Customer paying a Facilites Charge to the Company. (b) Please admit or deny that th Schedule 19 tari provides no statement that customers have the opton to own and operate all facilties beyond the point of delivery. If deny, please explain. (c) Please provie the legal basis for the Company to require that it own facilities on the propert of Schedule 19 customers. If the customer does not consent to . the Company placing and maintaining such equipment on the custmets prope, does the Company believe that the tari give It the legl riht to do so? Does the Company obtain written consent from custome to place facilities on the customers' propert? . What tye of consent does the Company obtain? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20: (a) The first paragraph of the facilities charge proviions in Schedule 19 states, "At the option of the Company, transformers and other facilites instlled beyond the Point of Delivery to provide Primary or Transmission Service may be owned, operated, and maintained by the Company in consideration of the Customer paying a Facilities Charge to the Company." (b) Schedule 1 9 states what Idaho Power will possibly do beyond the point of delivery, but is not intended to addre what customers mayor may no do with their propert. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 21 Exhibit No. 306 IPC-E-l I-oS Reading, ICIP Page 2 . . . . (c) There is no legal reuirement that the Company own facilities on the propert of Schedule 19 customers. At the customer's request, the Company, at its option, may instll Company-owned facilities on the customer side of the point of delivery. Schedule 19. on file and approve by the Commission. gives the Company this option and the legal authority to do so. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks; Senior Regulatory Analy, Idaho Power Company, In consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 22 Exhibit No. 306 IPC-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 3 . REQUEST FOR PRODUCnON NO. 57: Reference th Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 20(c). Please confrm that the Company does not obtain wrtten consent - through uniform contract or otherwse - from customers prior to placing facilties beyond the point of delivery and signing the customer UP for the facilties charge. If not, please explain how the Company obtins infrmed wrien consent. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 57: Beginning in 2010, prior to placing facilties installed beyond the Company's point of delivery on a facilities charge, customers sign a Servce Request form indicating that the facilities charge wil be added or adjusted on their monthly power bill. Specifically, the language on the Service Request form states, "I understand that the Facilites Charges billng will be added or adjusted on the monthly power bil afer the work order construction and reconciliation process is complete." The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Copany, in consultatin wih Jason B. Wil\ams, . Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 24 Exhibit No. 306 IPC-E-ll-08 Reading, ICIP Page 4 . . '.(I . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCOON NO. 72: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request No. 57. Please provide the "Servce Request Form." Please confirm that the form is not provided to or signed by existing facilities charge customers, except with reard to new equipment installed at their premises. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 72: Please see th attched PDF file for a copy of the Service Request Form. The Servce Request form for facilities charge customers is signed by new customers going on a facilites charge and by existing customers requestng alterations to equipment installed under the facilities charge provisions. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analys. Idaho Power Company, in consulttion with Jason B. Wiliams. Corporate Counsel. Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 13 Exhibit No. 306 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP PageS l.~, ..' .. ,~ ~~~'I;I¡(.1...."':i~~H~lV~J.,ìJ ""lH.~ . .":! FU1llJ ¡¡n. Idao Power Company Service Request Pag I Da: 8J01 I .,.'- .:~:'.. '''R'il: ';i"'n.~.:'... Servce Request Number. 00312158 Work Order Numbe: Request TYpe: Ra Sch.. Rely By' Contact Detail: FC SPF Locon Service Lõon. Reui In Serice Da: Plain Centeea. GRAMAPP 81312011 CCANYON CUST 4655111 IPCO 465-8635 Attibute Information Fac:lities .Charg Servce Volta Numbe of Phas KW Motr Load: La Motor t Phase KW Demad 3 Phase KW Demand Commercial KW Lo Commercial Desrt Amoun No. Of Mete Met Locaon CtLo Pnmar OHlG Seice OH/G SrvOwner Pael Amp Siz . Note install priar metri underground to pme swh and raal fee to mulpl pa mounte xfnr. I ua that f.e Facilites Charges billig will be aded or aiustd on the monthly power bil afer the work order constrction and reccilion proce is coplet I understad that reested cost esats for reovals or trfe are biled basd on esated cost Requested estiat for intals are bas on an esate, and the acal monthly Facilties Chae is biled based on actu renctled work order cost for insls i verifY that the informon I have provided iS accurat to the be of my knowledge I undersd tht any chanes to the project includig but not limit to; load loction, voltage, et, may result In addional chaes Client Signatu Date Major Cuomer Rep. Signatu Date Exhibit No. 306 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 6 . . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXHIBIT NO. 307 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request Nos. 9,10,11, and 68, and Correspondence Regarding Idaho Power's Position on Selling Facilties Charge Equipment EXIBIT ~,3rJlï'(l :r :p I . . . REQUEST FOR PROQU~N NO.9: Is the Company willng to sell the Company-owned facilities beyond the point of delivery to it customers at the depreciated bok value? If yes, please explain why this option is not provided for in the Schedule 19 tanf. If no, please explain why. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.9: No. It is th Company's polley not to sell Company-owned facilits installed beyond the point of delivry. The response to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wit Jason B. WIllams, Corporae Counsel, ldaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 9 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-oS Reading, ICIP Page 1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10: Is the Company willng to sell the Company--ed facilits beyond th point of delivery to it custoer at the fair market value? If yes, please explain why this opn is not provi for in the Schedule 19 tariff. If no, please explain why. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10: No. It is the Company's policy not to sell Company-owned facilities installed beyond the point of delivery. The reponse to this Request was prepare by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Anlyst, Idaho Power Company, in conslton wi Jason B. Wiliams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -10 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 2 . . . . . . REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11: Reference the email contained in ICIP Secnd Requests for Production Attachment 1. Please exlain why the Company determined it could not sell Company-owned faclites beyond the point of delivery to J.R. Simplot Company. Please include explanaton of both bases asserted for the decision not to sell facilltes - (1) I.C. § 61-328 and (2) the way Idaho Power wants to run its business as a reulated public utilit. RESPONSE TO REqUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11:Company rereenttives met with Don Sturtvant, Energ Manager. Conseation, Alterntives, & Procument, for the J.R. SimpJt Company ("Slmplor); Simplofs attomey. Mr. Gre Adams; and Simplots consultant, Mr. Don Reading, Vice President and Consulting Economist, wih Ben Johnson Assciates, Inc., at their request on December 28, 2010, and again on April 11. 2011, to discuss the Company's position related to th sale of Company-owned facilities to Simplot. At the April 11, 2011, meeting, Idaho Power representatives explained that it had made a business decision that it was not going to sell Company-owned facilities to Simplot As a regulated public utility, the Company operates It business within the parameters of the law, its regulators, and its taris wih customers. The Company is fre to make any business decision so long as it does so witin those parameters. Idaho Code § 61-328 requires the Idaho Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") to authrie the sale of any public utilty propert finding that such sale (a) is consistent with the public interest; (b) that the cost of and raes for supplying Servce wil not be increased by reason of such transaction; and (c) that the applicant for such acquisiton or transfer has the bona fide intent and financial capabilty to operate and maintin the transferr propert in the public serice. In this instance, if IDAHO POWER COMPANS RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 11 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E- ii-os Reading, ICIP Page 3 Idaho Power were to elec to sell Company-owne facilites to Simplot, it would need to . increase the revenue requirement and rate to rever the revenue requirement for Schedule 19 customers as a result of the trnsaction. At the conclusion of the April 11, 2011, meeting, Simplots attorney indicated it was going to send a letter to Idaho Power reuesting a formal price quote for the amount necessary for Simplot to pay for th removal of Company-own facilit on it side of the point of delivery that included an amount necessry that would hold all other Scule 19 customers harmles. To date, Idaho Power has not received any such reue. Regardless of whether the Company doe recee such a reuest, Idaho Power has determined that, at this time. it is not in the business of sellng these types of Company-owned facilites to third partes. The response to this Request was prepare by Sctt D. Sparks, Idaho Power Company, and Greg Said, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Idaho Powe COmpany, in consulttion wih Jason B. WiUiams, Corate Counsel, Idaho Powr Company.. IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER - 12 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 4 . . . . REUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 68: Reference the Company's Response to ICIP Request Nos. 9, 10, 11, and 51. Please contimi, despite th responses to these quesons that it is not the Compny's policy to sell distrbution facilties to customers, that in Case No. IPC-E-05-16 the Company sold distribution facilities to the Sun Valley Company/Sinclair Oil Co. at depreciated bok value. What is th Company's policy Please exlain why the Company will sell facilities to one customer at book value but refuses to sell to other customers at bok value. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 68: The Company's response to ICIP Request Nos. 9, 10, and 11 all clearly state the Company's policy that it will not sell Company-owned facilit installed beyo the point of delivery. The Company's response to ICIP No. 51 sttes that in the last fie years, one custmer has requested removal of facilities instlled beyond the Company's point of delivery. IPUC Case No. IPC-E-oS-16 involve a unique situation whereby the Company and Sinclair Oil Company dlbla Sun Valley Company ("Sun Valley") mutually agreed to submit a joint application to IPUC to transfer certin distributon facilites from the Company to Sun Valley. IPUC approved the trans, concluding that the transer would "no cause any increase in raes and Sun Valley will be able to maintin the acuire distribution facilties necssary to serve its tenants. We tind the improved operating effciencies serve the public interes" IPUC Order No. 29864 at 3-4. Th response to this Reques was prepared by Jason B. Wiliams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIA CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POER - 8 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-II-oS Reading, ICIP PageS .:I.lN a. 0I ATTORNEYS AT LAW Tel: 208.938.7900 fax: 208.938.7904 P.O. Box 7218 Bols.ID 83707 . 515 N. 27rh Sr. Bose. 10 83702 July 30, 2010 V"UI U.s. Mai ød E-ma Donova E. Waler Idaho Power Compay P.O. Box 70 Bois, Ida 83707-0070 dwalker(à)jdahopower.com Re: Idao Powerls Fadli Chrge for La Power and Speial CODtrd Cusm.ers De Donova: I wrte on bef of my clien th Inustal Cuomer ofIdao Powe ("ICIP"), rega Idao Powe's Scheule i 9 taff failty chge, whch is also includ in sp contrct for powe saes above the Scheule i 9 ta limit I left you a messa rear ths matter ths wee bu am seg ths let to fuy prt my client's coce in hop of rehi a spy relution toth ma. . BaeUDd Ida Powe's Sche 19 ta inluds a faties cha, whch stes as follows: FACILITIES BEYOND TH POINT OF DELIVERY At the opton of the Compay, trformers and other failites inled beyond the Point of Delivery to provided Pr or Transsion Serce may be owned opted, and maintaied by the Compay in consideration of the Custmer payig a Facilties Chae to the Compy. Compay-owned Faclities Beyond the Point of Delivery will be se for in a Distbution Facilties Investent Reprt provided to the Customer. As the Company's invesent in Facilties Beyond th Point of Deliver changes in order to provide the Cusomer's sece reuients, th Compa shal notify the Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-OS Reading, ICIP Page 6 . . . . Mr. Waler July 30, 2010 Page 2 Customers of the adtions and/or deletons of facilties by forwarg to the Cutomer a revised Distbution Facilties Invesent Reprt In the evt th Customer reuests the Company to remove or rein or change Compay-owned Facilties Beyond the Point of Deliver, the Cusmer shl pay to the Compay the "non- savable cost" of suh remova, reinlation or chage. Non- savable cost as used hein is comprse of the tota deiated cost of materal, labor and overds of the facilies, less the differce beee the salvable cost of material removed and reval 'labor co inluding appprate overhea cost. The curtly aurize monthy chage in th taff is "the Company's investen in Company- own Facilties Beyond the Point of Deliver ties 1.7 peen" - which ads up to an anua chage of20.4 % ofIdao Power's inital investment Industal cusomers do not realy payoff th investent in the facilties and as wrtt in the tarff they contiue payi 20.4 % anualy on the intial investen with no prvision for a depecation of the value of tht investment over tie. In other word, for a $10,000 investent in a piece of equipment by Idao Power in 1977, th chage prsues th equient at issue re its $10,000 value th-thee yea later in 2010, an chges the same $2,040 chage anualy in yea th-the as in yea one. One of ieip's membe, J.R. Simplot Co., recetly confed that it wa indee stll beng chaed 20.4 % anuay on the initial prcipa for a piece of equipment initially ined in 1977. Our reseh at th Commssion indicaes that ths facilty chage wa caculated way back in the mid-1980s, and aproved in Cas No. U-1006-298. We obtaed Ida Power's work papers support the cacuaton in tht ca and I have athe the most usfu portons to ths leter. As you ca se frm the work paer, Idah Powe caculatd an averae of its investents in thes facilties over the year 1985 an 1986 (on pae 5 of 27), and then (as shown on th su pa) caculate out and sumed the percentages of several facilty-related exps for whch Idao Powe believed it wa enttled to recover frm customers. Those item includ chas to the cuomer for depciation, in taes prope taxes, other taes, opetion and matence, adintive an gener, wo capita, and insurance, as well as the Compy's then-autori 9.90 % rate of re Ultily, Idao Power arved at th anua peentae of 20.483 % of the inti facilty inveent ICI's Positon ICIP believes th th facilties chare of 1.7 % monthy is no longer a fai, jus and reasnablecha, and reuest that Idao Power ag to reuc the monthy chge and provide custmer with the opton of payig off the reai intial co of Company-owned facilties. Fir, our reh indica tht the 1.7 % monthy chage caculed in the mid-1980s is simly to high becus the inuts have change over tie. For example, Idao Power's auori rate of retu frm its 2008 gen rate ca is now only 8.18 % -- i. 772 % less th included in the Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 7 Mr. Walker July 30, 2010 Page 3 . failties charge. And fr Idao Power's 2009 Federa Energy Regury Commssion Form 1, we ca tell that anual perctaes for opon and maitenace and for admistve and gener should decr by a tota of 2.0328 % fr those in th cut taff. These ites alone ca for an anua petae chage dec by 3.7548 %, to apoxiately 16.728 0/ anualy, or 1.394 % monty. Addtionaly, ICIP believes th dereiation chae is unnable. Regares of wh the cae may have be in the mid- i 9808, the Comsion cutly requies Idao Powe to reuce the prcipa of its invesents by a dereciation facr if the invesen is one for which the Company ea a re. In othr word, the Commsson does not tyically alow Idaho Power to chage the anua rae on the sae pncipa amount over time beaus the value of the invesent decreaes over tie. The existig industral failty chage mechasm includes a 0.560 % anua charge to the cuomer for depciaton, but it does not reuce the prcipal frm which the failties chage is cacuated over tie. To have cusomers contiue payig intest on the initial caita invesent - such as Simplots facilties dag back to 1977 - long afer expirtion of the depiation scheule utlied (b it fi or twen yea or some other duron of stt lie depiaon) is siply unjus and unair. Above al, however, the Compay shuld inorm cumers up-front eah tie it ins facilties subjec to ths chae such that cusmer ar aw they ar signg onto what is ak to an ongoin ines paent for facilties mataed by Idaho Powe, and should allow customer to payoff the fu vaue to avoid mak such payments. In other words, ICIP reue tht cuers be inaned of th ters of the chage at the tie the facilty is plac on their side of the meter. And the Compay should also provide, an inorm customer of, a right to opt out of the fu facilties chage by payig down remag intial cost and paying the Comp a reasnable fee for the tie an materials to mata the facilties. Thes options should be available for exst facilties on cusmer' prs and for failties tht may be inled in th futu. . Conclsin On beha of ICip, I hop th th issu rase in ths let ca be resolved in a mutly agble faon and re in a fa an renable facilties chae. I appiat your coideraon of the ma an lok forard to me with you redi it in th ne futu. Ver tr~ y~ ,,- / '.J (, _ .~~(J~ Peter Richan Attrny for th Inusal Cusomer ofIdao Powe cc: Don Stuevant, J.R.. Simplot Co. Do Rea Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-08 Reading, ICIP Page 8 . . . . ..-..."'__.1U '''~.1B''__~~.a~. ""~..-ATTORNEYS AT LAW Tel: 208-9)8.7900 Fu: i08.9)8-7904 P.O. Bo 7218 8oiH. to 83707 - 515 N. 27th Sr. Boise. 10 83702 Deember 30, 2010 irui U.s Mai Ild E-m Donovan E. Waler Idaho Power Company P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idao 83707-0070 dwalkerÛì)idahopower .com Re: Idah Power's Fadlti Charge for Lae Power an Spee Contrct Customers Dear Donovan: I wrte on behaf of my fi's client, th Indusal Cusmer of Idao Power ("ICIP"), rega Ida Power's Schule I 9 taff facility chae, which is alo inlud in spal contts for power saes abve the Schede I 9 taff lit. Firs I would like to than you an th oth IdaPower retaves for mee with myslf, Don Stuevt, an Dr. Don Read regarg the ch on Debe 28, 2010. We apiate Ida Power's corrue willinss to attpt towor out th iss ra in ou let to you date July 30, 2010. I will suar the st of our discusons as I unded them. J.R SimPiot Compa Reguest As we discse, at ths tie, one ICI mebe - the l.R Simplot Co. - is inte in exerisin the opton of own al mcilties beyond the point of deliver for some or al of its Scheule 19 or Speial Contrt plants tag eleccity sece from Ida Power. Plea coider ths lett a foral reue fur the depiaed bo value Idah Powe would chae for Simplot to tae ownp of failites beyond th pot of delivery at eah of the Simplot premise curtly subjec to Ida Power's facilties che, an plea orga the cos by Simplot locon. Simplot will be ma fiial decisions for th ne yea in th comin mont so reciving Idao Power's èo inonnon by the en of Janua 2011 is crtica to its abilit to mae a decision for the comig yea. In order to mae ths decsion Simplot would also lie a copy of the Compay's ince poicy tht cover th Compay-owned falities beond the point of delivery. Additionaly, I underd th Mr. Stuant reue tht Ida Power offcial couc an audt of th falies includ on the failities chare for eah Simplot loction, and therby identify th Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-oS Reading, ICIP Page 9 Mr. Donovan Walr Decebe 30, 2010 Page 2 . pacular piecs of equipment for whch Idao Powe is as th faclities chae. Simplot would like to knw wh it ca expe th copleton of th au to en tht all of the failties inluded on the Distrbution Facilties Invesent Rert for Simplot prmises ar stll in fat in use at Simplot premses. Once reived, Simplot would like to wa thugh eah facility in ealy spnng, identifying each piece of equipmen with an Idao Power represetative. Prpos chge tg Tar laguge In response to our dicussons Idao Powe is curtly enaged in reculatg th 1.7% monthy failities chae with upte inormon frm th us in 1986 to intiy caculate that perctae. We ex to knw Idao Power's new perce by the end of2010, bu you stte we may not have th calcuaton for anoter month. We look forw to seg the realculated percntae. Also, at our mee on Ocbe iI, 2010, we discusse th possibilty of intug two alteratve argements to the Compay-ownrsp model emboed in the cur Scheule 19 taff. Idao Powe expss concern with a mied ownerp model for facilites beyond the point of deliver. Thus, the send alve we discus wa a eusomer-ownerhip model whereby th cusomer would pay Idao Pow for the depat bok vaue of th exist equipment on the cuser's pre. Ther, th cuomer wod be rensble for al opon and mace of failties beond th poin of deliver, an for acuition an mace of any equipment . nee in th fu. Idao Power would no longer chae suh cutomer a falities chae. The th alterve we discus wa a hybd alteve whereby th cuser would make a paymen for th caita value of th equiment but the Compay would stll own the equipmen and coduc opon an mace. Th Compay would assess only a limted facilies chae . which would not inlude the top th components of the chae - rate of re depreon, and income taes. Cumer selecg ths option woul therfore pay a reuce failties ch. At our mee ths we Ida Pow stte it is no longer inter in offeng the th option but we disc cha th la in the taff to adequaly reflec the send opton. The curt ta lan stes, "At the option gf the Compa" the Compay may own the equipment and assess the facilties chage, and the tar conta no exprss right for the customer to elect to own and mata all such facilties or to purchae Company-owned failties at dereciated bok value. We appreiate Idaho Power's position that it offers a cusomer-ownerhip option to al Schedule 19 customers as a matter of Compay policy, but we believe the taff should reflec ths opon. ICIP prpose Ida Powe include the modfications below in its nex ra ca filing (chaes in bold): FACILITS BEYOND TH POIN OF DELIVERY The Customer has the rit to own and maitain an facilties BeyoRd the Point of Deliery. M tile O,äSB 9f tke C91B,ey With wnten consent of the Customer, trfonner Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 10 . . . . Mr. Donovan Walker Deember 30, 20 i 0 Page 3 and other facilties insled beyond the Point of Delivery to provided Prma or Trasmission Serice may be owned. operad, and maitaed by the Company in considertion of the Customer pang a Facilties Chage to the Compay. Compay-owned Facilties Beyond the Point of Deliver will be se fort in a Distbution Facilties Investment Rep prvided to the Custom. As th Compay's invesent in Facilties Beyond the Point of Delivery chages in ord to provide the Customer's sece reuiements, the Compay shall notify the Customers of the additions anor deletions of facilties by forwng to the Customer a revise Distrbution Facilties Investent Report In the Dibution Fadlities Investment Report, the Company wil include the depreiated book value of Company- owned facilies and include notice of the opportnity for the Customer to purchase aD Company-owned failties Beyond the Point of Delivery at the depreiated book value. The Company wil not asse the Facities Charge to the Customer after ownership trnsfers. In the event the Cusomer rest the Compay to reove or reinstl or chane Company-owned Facilties Beyond the Point of Deliver witout the Customer takig ownership of the Facilties, the Customer shal pay to the Company the "non- savable cost" of such removal, reintalaon or charge. Non- savable cost as us herein is comprse of the tota depreiated cost of materials, labor an overheas of the facilites less the dierence beee the savable cost of materal reoved an removal labor cos includng aproprate overhead cost. We also believe th Ida Powe should sed a let to th maner of eah lare power an spial contt cusmer locon cury bein biled for facilties chages. wh Idao Power fuly exla the chae, includi a desripton oftl cha's componets an th tota anua payment frm the cuser. Conclsion 'T you aga for Idao Powe's contiue effort to work towards a muty beneficial reluton of th ma. If you have any questons. plea contt me. Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-oS Reading, ICIP Page 11 Mr. Donovan Walker Decmber 30, 2010 Page 4 l;~ Grory Adas Atrn for the Inus Cusomer ofIdao Power cc: Indusal Cuomers ofIdao Power Membe Companes Dr. Don Reag Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-l 1 -OS Reading, ICIP Page 12 . . . . . . , . *SIØU""PO~ An IDACORP ComDany DONOVAN E. WALKERSeio Coidwaikedaopea January 31. 2011 :, ('''~~'--- '. ',' ':::;)1c."r:r\;, '".A .!' J ¡ i ~ ; t: " ,. :"~ .t . . ~ '~I"-. ",". :..,' ; ! . !.) i" I.. iBY__ I--~Grery M. Adams RICHARDSON & O'LEARY, PLLC 515 Nort 27th Stret P.O. Box 7218 Boise, Idaho 83702 Re: J.R. Simplot Company's Request to Purchase Idaho Power Company Facilities Dear Mr. Adams: This letter reponds to the Dember 30,2010, leter sent by you on behalf of theIndustal Customers of Idaho Power ("ICIP"), and more specally, J.R. Simplot Company ("Simplot"), as well as the faceto-face meetng we had on Decmber 27, 2010. As wi all of the ICIP custmers, Idaho Power values its business relationship wit Simplot and wants to work with it on resolvng any concems or issues reted to the servce Idaho Power provides. That said, this response is nessary to clari Idaho Power Company's ("Idaho Powet') position on certain matters that we discussed with you at th December 27, 2010, meeing so that you have clear expeions as to what Idaho Power will agree to do in reards to your reuests. Firs, as reue by you in your December 30, 2010, letter, Idaho Power will provie Simplot Propose "buyul pri, by Simplot plant locations receivng primary service. for all facilities owned and operaed by Idaho Power that are located on the Simplot side of th Point of Delivry. As we discussed, Idaho Power will be prepared to offer a fair market value price of thse facilities as determined by Idaho Power, not the depreated book value prce. Both Idaho Powets regulatory and finance departments are busy preparing this informon, and Idaho Power will provie it to yo~ once it is redy. At this time, Idaho Power anticipates that it will have something available to you by mid-March. In addition, in th event Idaho Power agrees to sell these facilites to Simplot, Idaho Power will most likely need to instll additnal protecion equipment on the facilities on the Idaho Power side of the meter that fees the Simplot locations. This additonl equipment will be nessary for system integri and reliabifty purposes. 1221 w 'Eitibíf~) 307 P,~ Bo~ 79nr_E_11-OS Boise. 10 l!tYReading, ICIP Page 13 . . Greory M. Adams January 31, 2011 Page2of3 . Currently, Idaho Powr anticipates tht it will provi your client wih a more speifc list of the neesry sysem equipment upgraes by mid-Mrc as well. Idaho Power will let you know if it is going to be unable to prvide you wih eiter this information or th pricing infrmatin by mid-March. Secnd, Idaho Power does not have spec insurance policies which cover "Company--wned facilites beyond the point of delivery." Like most businesses, Idaho Power has broad, general liabilit policies which rover various aspects of it business, insuring Idaho Power against propert damage, accidents, and othr loss. As we explained when we me with you in Dember, such policies do not rover against equipment that must be relace afer it has reche the end of it useful life, or for the replacent of equipment that fails afer the expiration of the manufcturer's warrnty. Third, Idaho Powr has rompleted facilites assessments for eight of th nine Simp lot locations currently operaing under Idaho Power's facilities charge tari provisions. The asssment meodoloy, which indudes facilities investment reports and mapping by plant locaion, were recently reviewed and approved by Don Sturdevant at Simplot (see enclosure). Idaho Powr anticipates rompleting the facilties assssment for the final loction, the Simplot Pocaello Donn locatin, by the end of February. Once Idaho Powr rompletes all the facilites assesments, it will meet with Simplot to discuss, as well as estblish, a schedule to ronduct physical, on-site asssments at the Simplt locations.. Fourth, as a business matr and as discused, Idaho Powe wil not maintain facilits beyond Idaho Power's Point of Delivry that are owned by third partes. Morever, if Idaho Power facilites are transferr to third parties and removed from Idaho Power's ownrship, there will be no opportunit for those facilities to be returned to Idaho Powr's sysm for Idaho Por to operate and maintain. Put diferently, once Simplo or any other customer purcases Idaho Power facilities, tht customer wil be wholly reponsible for operating and maintining those facilits on a going-forward basis. Any custmer that elec to purcase suc facilities will not have the ability at a later date to trnsfer thse faciliti back to Idaho Powr to maintin and operate. Once transferr, Idaho Powe will have no responsibilit, or liabilit, assciated wih maintining inventories of those facilties or failure or other operatinal or maintnance issues assdated wih those faclities, nor will Idaho Power be reponsible or liable for any consequentil, spial, or othr damages, including loss of production and lost profi, that cold reult. In additon, in the evet Idaho Power agrees to sell any facilities located on th Simplot side of the Point of Delivery, it will need approval frm the Idaho Public Utlits Commissin ("I PUC") pursant to Idaho Code § 61-328 prior to trnsferrng the facilities. Idaho Power will likely nee your support and coperation in making that filing wi the IPUC. Fifh, as we discusse at lengt, the existing tari language addressng facilites charg provisions is sufient and adequately descrbes the Facilities Charge. As wi Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 14 . . , . . . . . Greory M. Adams January 31, 2011 Page30f3 any reulated public utilit, ownership and responsibilit for equipment and facilities beyond th utlit's Point of Delivery is, by default, wih th custmer. Amending the tari language. as proposed in your letter. may potentially cause more problems and ambiguit than it would relve, and is not neæssry. Morever, as the attorney reprsentng th ICIP cusmers, you are very well aware of Idaho Powes interpretaon of Schedule 19 as well as Idaho Powets polic allowing Schedule 19 customers to purcase, own, and operae Idaho Power facilites located on the customets side of the Point of Delivry. Thereore, sending out letters to all ICIP cuomers informing them of this intrpretation and policy would be reundant .andunnery. Sincrely,~ztU~ Donovan E. Walker DEW:csb Enclosure Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 15 . . r " .2Adams From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wiliams, Jason (JWillamscmidahopower.com) Wednesday, April 06, 2011 3:51 PM Greg Adams Don Reading RE: Simplot failities discussion . Gre, After internal discussion, we have decided that we would raher discuss the entire issue with your client, as, from our perspective, this is not about price. As i shared with you yeterday, as a policy matter, Idaho Power has decided it is not going to sell the facilities to Simplot. The factors that went into that decision are: 1) our statutory obligation (61-328) to hold other customers harmless in sellng utilty owned assets; and 2) the way we run our business as a regulated public utilty. So while we can go over the buy-out price metodology we ran in analyzing Simplofs reuest, that methodology and the resultant price ultimately had little bearing on Idaho Power's decision to not sell those facilties. At this point, debating the price methodology we use as part of this analysis would not be productive as it will not impact the decision we have already made. Thanks, Jason Jason Willams Idaho Power Company .(208) 3885104 . From: Gre Adams rmailto:Greg(9riChardsnandoleary.coml se: Wednesay, April 06, 2011 9: 16 AM To: Willams, Jason Cc: Don Reading Subjec: RE: Simplot facilitie discussion Jason, Thanks for letting us know about the problem Idaho Power encountered in calculating the amount that Idaho Power would need to charge Simplot for existing facilties beyond the point of the meter to (1) cover the book value of the facilities, or (2) keep the other Schedule 19 customers whole. After discussing the issue with our consultant, Don Reading, we were wondering if you could please send us the work papers associated with your investigation in advance of our meeting Monday? That would enable us to have a more substantive discussion. Thanks again. Grg Adas Richarson & O'Lear PLLC 515 N. 27th Street, 83702 P.O. Box 7218,83707 Boise, Idaho Voice: 208.938.2236 1 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 16 . ~ 'f . . Facsime: 208.938.7904 . Information contained in this electronic messge and in any athments hereto may contan informaton that is confident, protectd by the attorney/client privilege and/or attorny work product docte. Ths ema is innded only for the use of the individua orenti named above. Inadverent disclosure of the contents of ths email or its attchments to imended reipients is not intended to and does not constute a waiver of the attorney/client privilege and/or atorney work product docte. This trission is fuer covered by the Electonic Communication Prvacy Act is U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. If you have reeived this email in er, imediately notify the sender of the eroneous reeipt and destoy ths email and any attchents of the same either electrnic or prited. Any disclosure, dissemination, distrbuton, copying or use of the contens orinormation reived in err is stricty prohibitd. Tbanyou. Frm: Willams, Jason (mailt:JWiljams(idhopo.coml sent: Tueay, April OS, 2011 12:25 PM To: Greg Adams Subjec: Simplot facilities discussion Greg, As a follow-up to our discussion of last week, Idaho Power has made a determination relating to the sale of Schedule 19 facilties for Simplot. We would like to invite you and representatives of Simplot to meet with our folks to discuss. We could be available at Idaho Power's downtown offces on either Monday, April 11 at 11 am or Friday, April 15 at 11 am. . Please Jet me know if either of these times work for you and Simplot. If so, i can give you a call and we can discuss an agenda to make sure we cover everyhing that Simplot has asked. Thanks, Jason Jason Williams I Corporate Counsel I Idaho Power Company 1221 W. Idaho, Boise, 1083702 I .(208) 388 5104 I !8 jwiliams(.idahoDOwer.com ....~.. .....-.--_--"'-""_..-....,_...-~,_.."'..,'''...,"_..,..-.--__.~.._..,_...-....-......_-,-,._.._..._~" ~ Th trsson may co ii th is prvileg coal BId/ exempt ti disclosur under apicale law. If you ar no the in repien you are herby noed th any diclosur co dibuon or us of th inon cont her (including an relía ther) is STRCTLY PROlßITD. If you reive thtrssion in er, plea imedatly c:taet the sende BId des the maal in its enre, wher in elecie or ha eo for Th you. ---'_._--_._---_.,_...,..........__...._------,---_._... ..~.-.--._..---"---.'_.'",.....-_.,..~....-...,--.~..-..--.-__.._. _r~.. __~_"... . 2 Exhibit No. 307 IPC-E-ll-OS Reading, ICIP Page 17 . . . BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. IPC-E-ll-08 INDUSTRI CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER READING,DI TESTIMONY EXIDBIT NO. 308 Idaho Power's Responses to Production Request Nos. 12 and 51, and Correspondence Regarding "Removal" of Facilities Charge Equipment EXIBIT ~,308:i:p . . . ,.. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12: Does the Company provide customers paying the facilities charge with any option to ever stop paying th facilities charge, and acquire and control their ow equipment on their own propert If so, please identif the language In the existing or proposed tari highlighting this option for custmers. and explain how this proce work. Please include explanation of the length of time it would take Idaho Power to provide customers wih a calculation of the cost for the customer to pay Idaho Power to remove the facilties and stop paying the facilities charge. Since 1987, how many customers have (1) inquired into this option, (2) exercsed this option? RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12: Customers paying a facilities charge can reuest that the Company remove all of its facilities located on the customets propert. In this case, the customer would no longer pay a monthly facilities charge afer all facilities were removed and all removal fees were paid. All customers can reuest removals, relocations, upgrades, or conversions wiout specic tari language Indicaing that they can make such a request. The length of time it would take Idaho Power to provie customers wih a calculation of the cost for the customer to pay Idaho Power to remove the facilties and stop paying the facilties charge will vary base on the site configuratin and the number of facilities being removed. The Company does not track the number of customers that have inquire into this option or exercised this opton. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analy, Idaho Power Company, in consulttion Wi Jason B. Willams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAl CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -13 Exhibit No. 30S IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIN NO. 51: Reference th Company's Response to ICIP Reques No. 12 (statng that "Cumers paying a facilities charge can reuest that the Company remove all of Its facilities located on the customer's property"). Has any customer ever reuested reoval of th facilties beyond the point of delivery 'f yes, please explain how the Company increased other custmers' rates in that circumstnce. If no, has the Company ever offere to allow a customer exercise the removal option in response to a customer's complaint rearding the facilties charge? Please explain. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 51: One customer has recently (within the last five years) requested removal of facilities instlled beyond the Company's point of delivery. The request was for removal of two transformers. If reoved, the customer was going to install, own, operae, and maintain 1t own transfrmation. In response to the customets request, the Company provided the customer a cost quote for the removaL. Ultimately, the customer did not pursue the removal and there was no impact on custmer classes' revenue requirement or rates. The response to this Request was prepared by Scott D. Sparks, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation wih Jason B. Willams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SIXTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER -12 Exhibit No. 30S IPC-E-11-OS Reading, ICIP Page 2 ," . . . . . . . '" ~.0TATTORNEYS AT LAW Td: 208-938-7900 Fu: 208-938.7904 P.O. Bos 7218 8o. fD 83707 - 515 N. 27th s.. Boisi.IO 83702 Augst 25, 20 I 1 JI u.s. Mai lid E-m Donova Waler Lisa Nordsm Jasn Willam Idao Powe Company P.o. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707-0070 Re: Formal Reques for co ofmnov offaeßti ehare equipment frm J.R Simplot Co. prees De Mr. Doova Waler, Ms. Usa Nor an Mr. Jasn Willams: I wrte on be of my fi's clien JoR Simlot Compay, to fomiy reuest tht Idao Power prvide cost figus for Simplot to exercse its right uner the applicale taffs and Speial Contrt to have Idao Power remove the distbution failties subject to Idao Power's failties chage at its Schedules 9, 19 and Speial Contrt locations. Speifically, the taff an Speial Contr allow Simplot to pa Ida Power the "non-salvable co" of reova of thefailties beond the pot of deliver. Th "Non-savable cost" is "the tota depciated cost of materals, lab and overhea of the faclities, less the difference betwen the savable cost of materal reoved and remova labor cost includig appate overhe costs." Pleas also include with the reoval cos the intial investment in the facilties to be reoved for eah locon. Plea provide al work pap supprt the remova costs. Simplot also reques th Idao Powe expla wheter Simplot's payment of reova cost, as caed for in the taffs and Speia Contr will have a rate impact on othr customer in the applicale rate class. Finy, if Idao Power includes additiona proteon equipment inled on the Idah Power side of the meter as par of the remova cots, plea separtely itee such equipment from oter costs for each loction, and pleas expla how the taff and Speial Contrt, as quote Exhibit No. 30S IPC-E-11-0S Reading, ICIP Page 3 Mr. Waler, Mr. Nordm, and Mr. Wíliams Augut 25, 2011 Page 2 above, allow for inclusion of such cost to be pad by Simplot. gAda Attrny for IR Símlot Co. re: Don Stva loR Sìilot Co. Dr. Don Rea, Be Johnn Asates Exhibit No. 30S IPC-E- II-oS Reading, ICIP Page 4 ., . . . . . . I.. 1:_. An IOACORP company JASON B. WILLIAMS Corte CounselJwilliainllopr.co (208) 388-5104 September 13, 2011 VI U.S. MAIL AND E-MAIL Gregory M. Adams RICHARDSON & O'LEARY, PLlC 515 North 27th Street P.O. Box 7218 Boise, Idaho 83707 Re: J.R. Simplots Request for Facilites Removal Dear Mr. Adams: Thank you for your letter dated August 25, 2011, on behalf of J.R. Simplot Company ("Simplot") and your request for Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "Company") to provide cost figures to remove Idaho Power facilites on the Simplot "side of the meter." As you are aware, we have met with you and Simplot representatives multiple times over the last year to discuss the Company's Idaho Public Utilities Commission- ("Commission") approved facilties charges and have provided you with detailed information related to those facilities and charges. In fact, Idaho Power spent hundres of man-hours conducting facilties audits of Simplot's locations and provided reports of those audit findings to SimploL Idaho Power has also provided you with voluminous information related to the facilities charge in the form of responses to requests for producton that you have submited in Idaho Powets pending general rate case at the Commission, Case No. IPC-E-11-08. Idaho Power will continue to provide Simplot with all relevant information it needs so it can evaluate and plan for its electric facilities and service needs. Your most recent request seking "cost figures" for the removal of Idaho Power- owned distribution facilities subject to the facilties charge is in itself a substntial undertaking. As you may be aware, there are approximately 1,800 different pieces of equipment spread acrss nine Simplot locations that are currntly subjec to the facilties charge. In order to be able to provide the requested cost estimate for the removal of facilities, a specific removal plan will need to be developed for each Simplot location. The larer Simplot locations may require multple project plans that reflect phased work efforts. In order to maintain servce to Simplot during the removal of facilities, Idaho Power and Simplot will need to have extensive cordination to ensure 1221 w. l~hp S.t.J8U02)30S P.O. Box ilXbibit No. Boise, 10 IßE- l1-oS Reading, ICIP Page 5 ¡ ,. ., . Gregory M. Adams September 13,2011 Page 2 of2 . that the removal of Company facilties/equipment has as minimal an impact as possible on Simplots business operations. Accrdingly, a threstep approach is required to provide Simplot with an accurate cost quote to remove Company-owned facilites from Simplots "side of the meter." First, Idaho Power operations persnnel will need to meet with Simplot operations personnel to discuss Simplot's prioriies assciated wi each facilit and to develop plans for removaL. For example, removal of Company facilties and replacement wih Simplot-owned facilities wil require partial or full outages of some Simplot locations. Second, Idaho Power engineering personnel will need to design and engineer the removal of facilties in a manner consistent with Simplots business operations nees. Consistent with the Company's Rule H tariff, Simplot wil be responsible for prepaying all engineering charges associated with designing plans for removal of and changes to the facilties. Finally, once the Company completes the engineering work necessry to develop plans for removal, it will be able to provide Simplot wih a cost quote. Please have Simplot operations persnnel contact Jim Hovda, an Idaho Power Major Customer Representative, to cordinate a time to meet to have the initial discussion related to developing facilities removal plans. As you may recall, Mr. Hovda has participated in our meetings over the last year and is familar wih Simplots operations. After this inital meeting, Idaho Power wil be able to provide Simplot with an estimate for the required prepayment of the engineering charge assciated wih the facilities removal plans and cost quotes. Once the engineering charges are paid, the Company wil proceed with the engineering work reuired to develQP the requested cost quote for removal of the facilities. . Sincerely, \ØK~ JBW:csb cc: Jim Hovda, Major Custmer Representative, Idaho Power (via e-mail) Donovan Walker, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power (vi e-mail) Don Sturtevant, J~R. Simplot Company (via U.S. Mail) Dr. Don Reading, Ben Johnson Assciates (via U.S. Mail) Exhibit No. 308 IPC-E-II-0S Reading, ICIP Page 6 . . . . .801n STATf UMlnKSITY Offce of the Vice President for Finance and Administration 1910 ~niversity Drive Boise, Idaho 83725-1200 Phone 208.426-1200 Fax 208-426-3826 December 2, 2011 Jean Jewell Idaho Public Utilties Commission 472 W. Washington P.O. Box 83720 Boise,.ID 83720-0074 JeanJewell(tpuc.idaho.gov Re: Case No. IPC-E-I 1-08 Public Comments - Boise State University Deai' Ms. Jewell: Boise State University respectfully submits the following public comments in regard to the above- captioned maUer. Intloduction Boise State University is ft public institution of higher education and body politic and corporate of theState of Idaho. The University is a comprehensive, urban university serving a diverse population through undelgraduate and graduate programs, research, and state and regional public service. As a public University, Boise State relies heavily on state appropriated funds and student tuition and fees, which together comprise roughly 44% of its FY2012 budget (the remainder consisting largely of federal and state grants, plÏvate gifts, and sales and services of auxilary enterprises). Previously, the State of Idaho helped defray the University's utilties costs for academic spaces through legislative appropriations based upon occupancy. Over time, however, additional occupancy funds have not been made available. It bas now been tlwee years since the State has provided additional occupancy funds to the University, and it is uncertain whether they wil ever be made available to the University again. The result has been necessary chanfls in funding sources foi' occupancy costs such as utilties; meaning, higher tuition and fees for the University's students. Boise State University is predominantly a Schedule 19 large-volume user, and is pel'eiiiially a top 20 customer of Idaho Power. For the fiscal year 201 I (ending June 30, 2011), the University's power consumption was roughly 41.6 million kWh, totaling more than $2.lmiUion dollars in costs. The University hosts three (3) primary meters fed fi'OIl two (2) Idaho Power feeders originatiiigat Idaho Powei"s Grove Substation in downtown Boise. There are 56 individual transformers supplying power to various facilities on campus. The University owns all connecting cabling from the priinaiy meters to the point of use while Idaho Power owns all individual transformers. Moi'e than one half of the campus's transformers (thii1y-one) are more than fifteen years old, Twenty- five are more than twenty yeai's old; seventeen exceed thirty years, and seven are older than foity. The oldest transformer on campus dates back sixty-foul' years, to 1947. The Univei'sity stil pays a facilties charge oll this, and all other transformers on its campus, regardless of their age. Annual facility charges EXHIBIT rf.3l9~/QT~ ~. . ~ . Jean Jewell December 2, 201 I Page 2 assessed by Idaho Power against the equipment are approximately $123,000 dollars. To date, the University estimates it has paid cumulative facilty charges approaching $ 1.5 mi1ion. Position The focus of these comments is the current and proposed facilties charge assessed by Idaho Powei' on its equipment. Boise State University shares many of the concel's expressed by the Industrial Customers of Idaho, as outlned in the Direct Testimony of Dr. Don Reading, dated October 7, 2011. and agrees in principle with the recommendations set forth thei'ein~ specifically, (1) that Idaho Power's proposed revised facilties charge be fe-calibrated and reduced, (2) that the Commission require Idaho Power to calculate the monthly facilities charge using the depreciated value of the initial investment in lieu of its existing and proposed method which ignores depreciation regardless of the age of the equipment; (3) that the Commission require Idaho Power to provide customers with the option to own 01' purchase facilities charge equipment based on a fair calculation of the depreciated book value of the facilties; (4) changes to the facilties charge tariff, and (5) that the Commission require Idaho Power to henceforth issue annual notices to customers to provide for, and fully inform them of the facilty charges by equipment, the effective annual rate, and ownership options. It is the Univei'sity's position that the facilties chai'ge at issue is excessive and lacks justification when applied to older equipment. Both the current charge (20.4%) and proposed revised charge (16.97%) are excessive, and more reflective of a consumer credit card rate of interest than a reasonable commercial finance chal'ge. For exainple~ wei-e Boise State University to initiate a bond issuance for the construction of new facilties at the present time, it could do so at an interest rate of approximately 4.25%. Moreover, the charge is assessed in perpetuity, regai'dless of the depreciated value of the asset assessed, or its age. As a result, cumulative facilties chai'ges assessed by Idaho Power against the equipment on Boise State University's campus have more than doubled the cumulative total of Idaho Power's initial investment in the equipinellt ($604,150.81 in initial investments; $1,443.774.31 in facilties charges assessed). On older transformers, this disci'epancy is even greater. In the case of the 1947 transformer, facilty charges assessed over the last 64 years have exceeded Idaho Power's investllellt by mote than thirteen times ($725.35 initial investment; $9,470, i 7 in clllUlIative facilty charges, with no foreseeable end in sight). Boise State University therefore concurs with the Industrial Customers of Idaho's recommendation for a reasonable, i-educed facilties charge, adjusted to reflect the age and depreciated value ofthe equipment at issue, and that customers be provided the option to own or purchase facilties charge equipment based on a fair calculation of the depreciated book value of the assets.p~ cc: Idaho Power ~ ~ " ¡ ~ ~ '1 - . . . Pr e s e n t v s K r o g e r R e c o m m e n d e d E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y R i d e r R e v e n u e at S t i p u l a t i o n R e v e n u e I n c r e a s e (a ) (b ) (c ) (d ) (e ) (1 ) (g ) (h ) (i) Gl (k ) Ra t e Cu r r e n t Cu r r n t Cu r n t Cu r e n t Se t t e m e n t Re c o m m e n d e d Se t t e m e n t Re c o m m e n d e d Ch a n g e i n Li n e Sc h e d u l e Ba s e EE EE - D R EE - N o n D R Ba s e EE EE - D R EE - N o n D R EE - N o n D R No . T a r i f f De s c r i p t i o n No . Re v e n u e ! Re v e n u e s Po r t o n Po r t o n Re v e n u e ! Re v e n u e s Po r t i o n Po r t o n Re v e n u e s (i 4 . 7 5 % (= 1 . 5 % ) (= 3 . 4 0 % ) (i 3 . 4 0 % (= 3 . 4 0 % ) Un i f o r m T a r i f f S c h e d u l e s i Re s i d e n t i a l S e r v i c e 1. , 4 , 5 $3 8 0 , 4 4 9 , 7 0 2 $1 8 , 0 7 1 , 3 6 1 $5 , 1 2 0 , 6 8 8 $1 2 , 9 5 0 , 6 7 3 $3 9 6 , 3 8 3 , 7 7 2 $1 3 , 4 9 3 , 0 7 6 $1 3 , 4 9 3 , 0 7 6 $5 4 2 , 4 0 2 2 Sm a l l G e n e r a l S e r v i c e 7 $1 4 , 3 6 0 , 8 0 6 $6 8 2 , 1 3 8 $1 9 3 , 2 9 0 $4 8 8 , 8 4 8 $1 4 , 9 6 2 , 2 7 1 $5 0 9 , 3 2 2 $5 0 9 , 3 2 2 $2 0 , 4 7 4 3 La r g e G e n e r a l S e r v c e 9P , 9 T $1 8 , 4 9 2 , 9 4 9 $8 7 8 , 4 1 5 $2 4 8 , 9 0 7 $6 2 9 , 5 0 8 $1 9 , 2 6 7 , 4 8 5 $6 5 5 , 8 7 4 $6 5 5 , 8 7 4 $2 6 , 3 6 6 4 La r g e G e n e r a l S e r v c e 9S $1 7 0 , 5 9 6 , 7 9 8 $8 , 1 0 3 , 3 4 8 $2 , 2 9 6 , 1 5 9 $5 , 8 0 7 , 1 8 9 $1 7 7 , 7 4 1 , 7 3 2 $6 , 0 5 0 , 4 0 6 In c l u d e d $6 , 0 5 0 , 4 0 6 $2 4 3 , 2 1 6 5 Du k / D a w n L i g h t i n g 15 $1 , 1 2 8 , 7 4 4 $5 3 , 6 1 5 $1 5 , 1 9 2 $3 8 , 4 2 3 $1 , 1 7 6 , 0 1 4 $4 0 , 0 3 2 in $4 0 , 0 3 2 $1 , 6 0 9 6 La r g e P o w e r S e r v c e 19 S , 1 9 P , 1 9 T $8 2 , 8 7 2 , I 0 8 $3 , 9 3 6 , 4 2 6 $1 , 1 1 5 , 4 2 3 $2 , 8 2 1 , 0 0 3 $8 6 , 3 4 2 , 9 7 2 $2 , 9 3 9 , 1 5 2 Ba s e R e v e n u e $2 , 9 3 9 , 1 5 2 $1 1 8 , 1 4 9 7 Ir r g a t i o n S e r v i c e 24 $1 0 3 , 0 6 6 , 5 2 9 $4 , 8 9 5 , 6 6 0 $1 , 3 8 7 , 2 3 1 $3 , 5 0 8 , 4 2 9 $1 0 7 , 3 8 3 , 2 5 6 $3 , 6 5 5 , 3 7 3 $3 , 6 5 5 , 3 7 3 $1 4 6 , 9 4 3 8 Un r e t e r e d S e r v c e 40 $1 , 0 6 2 , 1 1 5 $5 0 , 4 5 0 $1 4 , 2 9 6 $3 6 , 1 5 4 $1 , 1 0 6 , 5 9 8 $3 7 , 6 6 9 $3 7 , 6 6 9 $1 , 5 1 5 9 Mu n i c i p a l S t r e t L i g h t i g 41 $2 , 7 8 6 , 7 5 2 $1 3 , 3 7 1 $3 7 , 5 0 8 $9 4 , 8 6 3 $2 , 9 0 3 , 4 3 9 $9 8 , 8 3 4 $9 8 , 8 3 4 $3 , 9 7 2 10 T r a f f c C o n t r o l L i g h t i g 42 $1 6 0 , 1 9 1 $7 , 6 0 9 $2 , 1 5 6 $5 , 4 5 3 $1 6 6 , 9 0 1 $5 , 6 8 1 $5 , 6 8 1 $2 2 8 11 T o t a l I d a h o R a t e s $7 7 4 , 9 7 6 , 6 9 4 $3 6 , 8 1 1 , 3 9 3 $ 1 0 , 4 3 0 , 8 5 0 $2 6 , 3 8 0 , 5 4 3 $8 0 7 , 4 3 4 , 4 4 $2 7 , 4 8 5 , 4 1 9 $2 7 , 4 8 5 , 4 1 9 $1 , 1 0 4 , 8 7 5 Sp e c i a l C o n t r c t s 12 M i c r o n 26 $1 6 , 1 8 6 , 3 3 3 $7 6 8 , 8 5 1 $2 1 7 , 8 6 1 $5 5 0 , 9 9 0 $1 6 , 8 6 4 , 3 8 4 $5 7 4 , 0 7 1 $5 7 4 , 0 7 1 $2 3 , 0 8 1 13 S i m p l o t 29 $5 , 8 9 2 , 2 9 9 $2 7 9 , 8 8 4 $7 9 , 3 0 8 $2 0 0 , 5 7 6 $6 , 1 3 9 , 0 1 5 $2 0 8 , 9 7 5 In c l u d e d $2 0 8 , 9 7 5 $8 , 3 9 9 14 D O F J I N L 30 $7 , 6 6 1 , 3 8 4 $3 6 3 , 9 1 6 $1 0 3 , 1 1 9 $2 6 0 , 7 9 7 $7 , 9 8 2 , 1 8 9 $2 7 1 , 7 1 7 in $2 7 1 , 7 1 7 $1 0 , 9 2 0 15 H o k u - l s t B l o c k C h a r g e s 32 $2 4 , 2 0 4 , 3 4 3 $1 , 1 4 9 , 7 0 6 $3 2 5 , 7 8 0 $8 2 3 , 9 2 6 $2 4 , 2 0 4 , 3 4 3 $8 2 3 , 9 2 6 Ba s e R e v e n u e $8 2 3 , 9 2 6 $0 16 H o k u - 2 n d B l o c k C h a r g e s 32 $7 , 0 8 4 , 0 0 7 $3 3 6 , 4 9 0 $9 5 , 3 4 8 $2 4 1 , 1 4 2 $7 , 3 8 0 , 6 8 1 $2 5 1 , 2 4 2 $2 5 1 , 2 4 2 $1 0 , 0 9 9 17 T o t a l S p e c i a l s $6 I , 0 2 8 , 3 6 6 $2 , 8 9 8 , 8 4 7 $8 2 1 , 4 1 5 $2 , 0 7 7 , 4 3 2 $6 2 , 5 7 0 , 6 1 2 $2 , 1 2 9 , 9 3 1 $2 , 1 2 9 , 9 3 1 $5 2 , 4 9 9 18 T o t a l I d a h o R e t a i l S a l e s $8 3 6 , 0 0 5 , 0 6 0 $3 9 , 7 1 0 , 2 4 0 $1 1 , 2 5 2 , 2 6 5 $2 8 , 4 5 7 , 9 7 5 $8 7 0 , 0 0 5 , 0 5 2 $2 9 , 6 1 5 , 3 4 9 $2 9 , 6 1 5 , 3 4 9 $1 , 1 5 7 , 3 7 4 19 S t i p u l a t i o n R e c o m m e n d e d C h a n g e i n B a s e R e v e n u e $3 3 , 9 9 9 , 9 9 2 20 S t i p u l a t i o n R e c o m m e n d e d C h a n g e i n B a s e R e v e n u e P e r c e n t 4.1 % Br e a k d o w n o f E n e r g y E f f c i e n c y R e v e n u e Pc t o f C u r n t Cu r n t A m o u n t B a s e R e v e n u e s Pr o p o s e d Am o u n t In B a s e R e v . $2 9 , 6 1 5 , 3 4 9 $2 9 , 6 1 5 , 3 4 9 Pc t o f P r o p o s e d Ba s e R e v e n u e s NA 3.4 0 % 3.4 0 % 21 22 23 De m a n d R e s p o n s e ( D R ) P o r t o n 2 No n - D e m a n d ( N o n D R ) R e s p o n s e P o r t o n To t a l E E R e v e n u e s $1 1 , 2 5 2 , 2 6 5 $2 8 , 4 5 7 , 9 7 5 $3 9 , 7 1 0 , 2 4 0 1. 5 % 3. 4 0 %4. De m a n d R e s p o n s e ( D R ) P o r t i o n No n - D e m a n d ( N o n D R ) R e s p o n s e P o r t o n To t a l E E R e v e n u e s Da t a S o u r c e s : 1. S e t t l e m e n t S t i p u l a t i o n E x b i t N o . 2 . 2. ! P C w i t n e s s M a t t e w T . L a r k i E x i b i t No . 3 1 , p . 6 6 o f l 4 5 . Kr o g e r E x h i b i t N o . S 0 1 Ca s e N o . I P C - E - L L - 0 8 Wi t n e s s : K e v i n C . H i g g i n s Pa g e 1 o f 1 . . . LlSAD. NORDSTROM(ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALR (ISB No. 5921) JASON B. WILLIAMS (lSB No. 8718) Jdaho .Powr Company 1221 Wes Idaho Str (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208)388-25 .facsimile: (208)38936 InordstromOidahogowe.com dwalkertldahooowsr.côm lwlliamsflidahopower.com Altrneys for Idah~ Power Comøany ~ ... ~ ~-. '. EXIBIT _~ (p/J I RECEtVç:D ZOll OCT - ì Pi1~: l 8'. ';~ ... t.i~ f.:1:,-:.1;~".i ¡)jl, i '.~- r ~-; ':. - .., .t'i" ' ~'t-. ,-. '~'!'--" '.' - i .1'IITlll ,.:-,-) L.',,, :,.¡¡..',J \.' .\./ - " ' ''', BÉFORE THE'IDAHO PUBUCUTILmES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR ) AtJORITY TO INCRSE ITS RATES ) AND CHAGES FOR ELECTRIC - )SERVICE IN IDAHO. ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.IPC-E-11-Ð IDAHO POER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY' ACTIN PARNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHo.'S-.fiRS DISCOVERY REQUÉSTS TO IDAHO POWER COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company (Illdaho Powr" or IlCom~ny). and in respnse to the Communit -Action Parthip Àsciaton of Idaho's First Dlsc~ . Reque to Idaho Pow .dated Septmber 13. 2011, here. submit the following informatin: EXHIBIT IDAHO POER COMPANS RESPOE TO COMMUNITY ACTIO PARERSHIP ASIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POR ~ 1 J(.4?O IrJ 'Z . . .. REQUEST NO.1: Please proVie a history of WAQC, or its preecssor proram(s) frm the time of original incption to the prent. In rending to this Request, pleasa provide the following detils: a. The year when the proram was first implemented; b. The rationale for Implementtin of the prgram; c. The objecive of the proram incuding targts for energy savings and assistnce to th Company's lowincome customers. d. Annual funding levels for each year since inception. and; e. AU prram desn changes implement. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.1: a. A 10w income weatherization proram. th preecessr to Weahetin Asistnce for Qualifte Customers ("WAQC"). was apprved in 1989 under th Idaho . Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") Order No. IPC-E-89-. b. . Please see tne copy of the IPC-E-89-6 Applicatin included in Idah Powets 1989 Conservation Plan filed.wi the Commission in April 1989 provided on the enclse no-coential CD. In this Applictin. Idaho Powr reuested approval to partcipate in the State of Idaho Low .Incme Weatherion Assistnc Proram for a peri of fiv years. c. Plese- se the Company's respnse to -the Community Acton Partrship_ of Idaho's ("CAPAI") Reques No. 1.b above. d. Since 2004. In compliance wih Commission Orer No. 29505. Idaho , Power has funded the WAQC proram at $1.2 million dollars per yer. Also. in complianc with this Commission Orer. if a spec Communit Actn Partnership IPAHO POWER COMPANS RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY ACTION PARNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POER - 2 . . ("CAP") agency does not spend it allotted annual funding, it can carr those funds over into the following year. In addition to th $1.2 milHon dollars per yer. Idaho Powr funds administrtive overheads. The Excel file provied on ihe non-cnfentlal CD includes all of Idaho Power's Low Income Weaerin Assistnce and . Weatherition Assistnce for Qualif Customers pro~m êxpnses frm 1989 to 2010. Idaho Power could only query its currnt accunting sysem to 2000. Exenses earlier than 2000 were obtained frm-the Company's Conservation .Plans. .These. system-e expenses were funded frm Idaho base rates, Oreon base rael¡ and Bonneville Power Administraon funds. No energy efciency rier funds are Included... e. Program design changes are Inclded in Idaho Power's annual Consrvtion Plans frm 1989 to 2003, Idaho Power's Demand-Side Managemen. Annual Report frm 200 to 2010. and the Companys WAQC report frm 2004 to 2010. Provided on ihe non-cnfldentlal CD are the relevant pages for each of th Low Income Weaterization Assistnc Program Conservion Plans for 1~89-2003. copies of the WAQC Annual Report frm 20 to 2010, and coies of Idaho Power's Demand- Side Management Annual Reports frm 2004 through 2010. The reponse to this Reques was prepare by Pete Pengilly. Custmer Researc and Analys Leader, Idaho PoWr Company, In consulton with JaSQn B. Wiliams. Corprate Counsel. Idaho Powr Compny. . IDAHO POER COMPANS ResPOSE TO COMMUNIT ACTIN PARTERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAH POER - 3 . REQUEST NO.3: Plese ste thè amount of currnt WAQC funding, for'the test year, as a percntge of the follong: a. Total Resiential 'class gros revenues; b. Total Company gross revenues: c. Totl funding for aliDSM prorams. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.3: a.' WAQC program expditure included in the test year are the same as actualsfor 2010, $1,321,132. Total Syem Residential class retail reVenues for the test, / year are $394,327.399, whic resultinWAQC funding being 0.34 percnt of sytem Residential class retail revenue. .b. WAQC proram expnditre ,included in.th test year are the same as actuals for 2010, $1,321,132. Total sysem Company retail revenues for th tes yer are $850,501,733, which reult in WAQC funding beng 0.16 percnt of sysem ,- Company reil revenue. ' c. WAQC proram expnditre included in th te year are the same as actuals frm 2010, $1,321.132. Totl expense frm all funding sourc for demand- side management("DSM") actes In 2010 were $4,832,851, whic reult in WAQC being 2.88 percnt of overall DSM expnses. The response to, this Reques 'was prepare by, Pete Pengily, Customer Resrch and Analysis Leader, Idaho Powr Company, and Darle NemniCh, Senior Pricing Analyt, ,Idaho Powr Company, in consulttin wi Jason B. WIllams, Corprate Counsl, Idaho Power Company. . IDAH POER COPANS RE$PONSETO COMUNITACTlON PARERSHIP ASIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POER.; 5 . . . REQUEST NO.5: Base on the number of Residential customers use for the tes year and the Company's currnt funding level of it WAQC proram, please stae the WAQC per capita funding level for Idaho Poer. RESPONSE TO REQYEST NO.5: The total average sytem Residental class customer count frm the tes year is 410,981. Using the 2010 actal WAQC proram expenditures included in the 2011 Test Year of $1,321,132, the average per capit expenditre forWAQC is $3.21. The reponse to this Reque ~ prepare by Dartene Nemnich, Senior Pring Analyt. Idaho Power Company, in consulttion wi Jason B. Williàms. Corprate. Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY ACTIO PARTNERSHIP ASOCIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVEY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POR - 7 . IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO COMMUNIT ACTIO PARTNERSHIP .. ASIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER - 9. . An . additnal enhancement of the. Company's serv to spial nees customers began in 2008 whn the Copany developed the Weatherin. Solutns. for Eligible Custmers proram. Which was piloted in 2008 and has since expanded into an energy efcincy proram servng. customers In the soutem, eastem, and wetem . . regions of the Company's servce area. Through September 2011. Idaho Power has spent $428,00 on the Weathenztin Solutns for Eligible Customers proram and the Gompany estimat that it will sp .another $300,000 wethenzlng homes by the end of 2011. This . proram is designe to serv thse custmers whose Income. pu them just above th. povert \ level and was developed to provie wetheritin servces to customers who are financially unable to partpate in oter residental energ efICency prorams and are not eligible.for the WAQC proram. Al. cusomers . parcipating in Weaherizan Solutions for EliglbleCustorn can be financally qualifed for WAQC but are. not pririized for service on th Sta of Idaho weatherizatin waitng list. , The response to this. Requet was prepare by Pete Pengily. Customer Reserch and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company. in consulttion wi Jason B. Willams. Corprate Counsel. Idaho Power Company., IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPOE TO COMMUNI1 ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOIATION OF IDAHO'SFIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER -10 .REQYESTNO.8: Regarding WAQC, please provie the folloing: a. All cost-effecveness studies or analyss of WAQC since inceptn; b. The Companys currnt mehooloy for evaluating the co- effect.nessof WAQC; c. When the Company Intends to file it next cost-effecenes stud of WAQC with the Commission,and; d. Debe in detail th metology by whic the Company intends to evaluate the cost-eecteness ofWAQC. R§SPONSETO NO.8: a. In addition to the attment provided in the Company's reponse to . CAPAI's Request NO.1 above, provided on the non-nfidential CD in rense to this . Request are the Demand-81d Manament 200 Annual Repo Supplement 1: Co- Effctiveness (revised) and the Demand-ide Management 2010 Annual Repo Supplement 1: Cost-Effctiveness. AII.of Idaho Pows cost-effecivenes studies and analys of WAQC are · desribe In the Copany's Demand Side Management Annual Report and the Demand-8ide Managment Annual Repo Supplement 1: Co- Effctiveness file wih the Commission for 2009 and 2010. . b. The Company's currnt methooloy for evaluating the cost-effeciveness of WAaC is included in the Demand-Side Management 2010 Annual Repo on pages 15. 60, and 135, and in the Demand Side Management 2010 Annual Repo Supplment 1: Cost-EffctiVeness on pages 1 through 4 and 45~ Both of these documents were filed wi the Commission on Marc 15, 2011. and are incded in th Company's reponse to. CAPAI's Reque Nos. 1 aOO.8. IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO COMUNIT ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCVERY REQUESTS TO IDAtO POER - 11 . . . c.The Company intends to. file the Dernnd-8id Managment 2011 Annual... Repo on March 15, 2012. Included in this report and it supplements will be the description and reult of all of Idaho Powes cost-effecess analys for all of "Its DSM proms. d. In addition to the infrmation included in the Copanys repose to CAPAI's Request No. S.c above, Idaho Power plans to couct an impact evaluaton of the WAQC. program' in 2012. This evaluation plan is includ on page ~. of the Company's Dømand-8ide Managment 2010 Annual Repo Suppment 2: Evaluati. The reponse to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengill, Customer Researc an Anlysis Leader. Idaho Powr Company. in consultn Wi Jason B. Willam$, Corprae Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POER COMPANS RESPÒETO COMMUNIT ACTION PARRSHIP ASIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAO POWER ..12 . REQUEST NO.9: Please admit or deny tha all of Idaho Powets exenditur in WAQC to date have been pruent RESPONSE. TO REQUEST "'0. 9: Since th inceptiOn of the WAQC proram through '.2010, the Commissn has dennined that Idaho Powts expenditure assciated wi WAQCWere prudently incurr. The response to this Request was prepare by Pete Pengilly, Customer Researc and' Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in cosulttio wi Jason B. Williams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Powr Copany. . . IDAHO POER COMPANYS RESPONSE TO COMMUNIT ACTION PARTNRSHIP ASOCIATION OF IDAO'$ FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAH POWER. 13 . REQUEST NO. 10: If your response to th preing Requ.is anyting other than an afrmative respnse, please explain why and to what extent exnditures In WAQC have not ben pruen. REPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 10: Please se the Company's rens to CAPAI's Request No.9 above. The rense to this .Reque was prepare by Pete, Pengilly. Customer Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power COmpany, in consulttion wi .Jason. B. Wiliams, Corprae Counsel, Idaho Powr Company. . . IDAHO POER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY ACTION PARNERHIP ASSOCATION OF ,IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REUESTS TO IDA POER -14 . REQUEST NO. 11: Please admit or deny that all of Idaho Power's expnditre in WAQC to date have been cost-eive. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.1.': The Copany has determined that th WACC program has. ben oost-eedive since it inception .acoording to the metodology. currnt utilized for d.eiminlng cost-eness of WAOC. The response to this Request was prepare by Pete Pengily, Customer Resrch and Analysis Leaer, Idaho Power Company, In consultion wih Jason B. Wiliams, Corprate Counsel, Idaho Pow Copany. . . i IDAHO POER COMPANS RESPONSE TO COMUNIT ACTION PARTERSHIP ASIATION OF IDAHSFIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POER -15 . BfayEST NO. 12: If your reponse to the preing Requet is anyting but afrmative, pleas. expain why and to what exten expnditres In WAQC have not ben cost-e and whether those expendlure were induded In the Company's rates as .well as the total dollar amount of said expitres. . . RESPONSE TOREgUEST NO. 12: Please see the Company's response to CAPAI's Requet No. 11 above. The reponse to this Reuest was prpare by Pete Pengilly. Custo~r Research and Analysis Leader. Idaho Power Company~ in consulttion wi .Jason B. .. Williams, Corprate Counsel. Idaho Por Company. IDAHO PQERCOMPANY'S RESPOSE TO COMUNIT ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO'SFIRST DISVERY REQUESTS TO IDAH POER -16 . REQUEST NO. 13: Is it the Companys contntn that its WAQC proram is no longer pruent or cost-effec at the present time? RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 13: No. Please seth Company's reponse toCAAI's Request Nos. 9 and 11 above. The response to this Request was prepare by Pete Pengilly, Custmer Reserch and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Copany, in consulttion with Jason .B. Wnlims. Corprate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. . . IDAHO POWER COPANS RESPONSE TO COMMUNIT ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POER -17 . . . REQUEST NO. 14: If yor response to th preing Request 18 in th affrmtiv, please provie a detiled explnation, wih all relevant supporting documenttion, demonstrating why the proram is no longer prudent and/or cost- effct. at what point in time it was. no longer prudent and/or cost-eecive, and precisely wh event(s) occrrd to make this tre. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 14: Please se the Company's rense 'to . CAPAl's Reques No. .13 above. The respose to this Reque was preare by Pete Pengily, Custmer Researc and Analysis Leader, Idaho. Power Company, In consulttin. wi Jason B. Willams, Corprate Counsel. Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POER COPANYS RESPOSE TO COMMUNIT ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASCIATIONOF IDAHOS FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POER -18 . REQUES NO. 18: Plase admit or dey th th Copanys 2010 DSM AnnUG1 Report flie wi th Comisn purp th th WAQC prram is a co-8ive DSM reurc. . . RESPOSE TO REQUEST NO. 18: As Shwn on page 45 of th De-8kJe Managment 2010 AnaI Repo Suppt 1: Co-Etrne, wh is prvided in th Copanys repo toCAPAI's Reque NO.8 abo, th WAQC proram has a benefit oo ra greter thn one und.the Utlit Co Tes th Totl Resourc Co Tes, an Ra Impa Mesure Tes As sted on pa 3 of th De-8id Managment 2010 Annu Repo Supplnt 1: Co-Effss the Participant Cost Tes is no calcla for th WAQC prram sinc there are no partcipant cost. The foot .on pa 45 stes: -Ene Saving fo each home is detrmin by an audit us th En Auit 4 (EM) fonn ap by th U.S. Departnt of . Eney. (DOE). Co-e is analyz on a per proje basis Eac pro mus have a savingo-invet rati (SIR) equal to or greater thn 1.- Th re to this Req was pr by Pet Penglly, Custmer Rerc an Anlys lead, Idaho Po Copany, in consultin wi Jason B. WiHia Corp Consel. Idah Po Company. . IDAHO POER COMPANS RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASOCIATION OF IDAHO'S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO IDAHO POWER - 20 . . . Benjamin Otto (ISB No. 8292) 710 N 6th Street Boise,ID 83701 Ph: (208) 345-6933 x 12 Fax: (208) 344-0344 botto~idahoconservation.org Attorney for the Idaho Conservation League, the NW Energy Coalition, and the Snake River Alliance BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ) APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER ) COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ) INCRESE ITS RATES AND CHARGES ) FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ITS ) CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF )IDAHO. ) CASE NO. IPC-E-ll-08 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NANCY HIRSH EXHIBIT 801 October 7, 20 I I Exhibit 801 Di, Hirsh Conservation Parties October 7, 2011 EXHIBIT Idaho Power Company's Response to Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho's First Production Requests to Idaho Power. REQUEST NO.5: Based on the number of Residential customers used for the test year and the Company's current funding level of its WAQC program, please state the WAQC per capita funding level for Idaho Power. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.5: The total average system Residential class customer count from the test year is 410,981. Using the 2010 actual WAQC program expenditures included in the 2011 Test Year of$l,321,132, the average per capita expenditure for W AQC is $3.21. The response to this Request was prepared by Darlene Nemnich, Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. Exhibit 801 Di, Hirsh Conservation Parties October 7, 20 i i . . . . . . Benjamin Otto (ISB No. 8292) 710 N 6th Street Boise,ID 83701 Ph: (208) 345-6933 x 12 Fax: (208) 344-0344 botto~idaoconservation .org Attorney for the Idao Conservtion League, the NW Energ Coaltion, and the Snake River Alance BEFORE TH IDAHO PUBliC UTIliTIES COMMISSION IN TH MATTER OF THE APPliCATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORIT TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ITS CUSTOMERS IN TH STATE OF IDAHO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-ll-08 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF NANCY HIRSH EXHIBIT80l Idao Power's Response to the First Production Requests of the Idao Conservation Leue, NW Energy Coaltion, and Snake River Alance November 16, ioii EXHIBIT . . . LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) JASON B. WILLIAMS (lSB No. 8718) Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 I nordstrom((idahopower.com gwaIJierCQahoQow~r.gQm jwilliams((idahopower. com Attorneys for Idaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MAnER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE IN IDAHO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ~".'-" ~-_._....._.__...._--_.._-_.__._---_.._". ) CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE . IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, N.W. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "Company"), and in response to the First Production Request of the Idaho Conservation League, N.W. Energy Coalition, and Snake River Allance to Idaho Power dated October 25, 2011, ' herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE. N.w. ENERGY , COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER - 1 REQUEST NO. 1 : Please provide the dollar amount Idaho Power has spent each year on evaluation, measurement and verification of all Demand Side Management programs for 2008, 2009, and 2010. Please include the total costs for both internal and external reviews as well as labor, overhead, materials, and any other expenses. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1: In 2008, Idaho Power spent $86,8.56 on third-party evaluations for its demand-side management ("DSM") programs. In 2009, the Company spent $206,483 on third-party evaluations for its DSM programs, plus an additional $139,034 on an energy effciency potential study. In 2010, as stated on page 11 of the Demand-Side Management 2010 Annual Report, the Company spent $293,000 on third-party evaluations of its DSM programs. Only evaluation expenses for studies conducted by third parties are directly tracked and accounted for in program expenses. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION . REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, N.w. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POwER - 2 . . . . . . REQUEST NO.2: Please provide Idaho Power's most recently available forecast of spending for evaluation, measurement and verification of all Demand Side Management programs for 2011 and 2012. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.2: In 2011, Idaho Power forecasts that it wil spend approximately $438,000 on third-party program evaluations. In 2012, the Company forecasts that it wil spend approximately $380,000 on third-part program evaluations. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Williams, COrporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, NW. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER. 3 REQUEST NO.3: Please answer the following regarding Company's evaluation . plan for 2010-2012 found on pages 4-6 of Supplement 2 of Idaho Power's 2010 Demand Side Management Annual Report. a. Does Idaho Power still intend to follow the plan as described? b. Would a reduction in the Energy Efficiency Rider level change this evaluation plan? If the answer is yes, please describe how so. If the answer is no, please describe how the Company intends to adjust program budgets to maintain the evaluation plan while still acquiring all cost effective energy efficiency. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.3: a. Throughout 2010, Idaho Power made minor revisions to its evaluation plan. In 2011, Idaho Power has made very few revisions to its plan and those revisions served to broaden the scope of the evaluations. The Company does not plan any major changes to the 2012 plan, but if any are anticipated, they will be included in the . Company's Demand-Side Management 2011 Annual Report. Program evaluation is an important facet of Idaho Power's DSM operational activities. Idaho Power has increased the frequency and the breadth of evaluations since the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding for Prudency Determination of DSM Expenditures ("MOU"). which specifies the Idaho Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") Staff's expectations of utilties' evaluations. Idaho Power relies on evaluations by third*party contractors, internal analyses, and regional studies to ensure the ongoing cost-effectiveness and overall effectiveness of programs through validation of program processes, energy savings, and demand reduction. The results of Idaho Power's evaluation efforts are used to enhance or initiate program changes. Annually, IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, NW. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER - 4 . . . . Idaho Power publishes its evaluation plan for three years in the Demand-Side Management Annual Report, Supplement 2. As stated in Idaho Power's Demand-Side Management 2010 Annual Report, on page 13 under "Program Evaluation": "Although the evaluation plan is expected to be used for scheduling evaluations, the timing of specific program evaluations wil be based on considerations of program evaluation needs, and other relevant regional studies." b. No. The level of Idaho Energy Efficiency Rider ("Rider") funding does not and has not determined Idaho Power's level of spending and/or evaluation of its DSM efforts. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, N.W. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER~ 5 REQUEST NO.4: Page 127 of Idaho Powets 2010 Demand Side Management . Annual Report indicates the Idaho Energy Efficiency Rider was underfunded by $17,592,938. In Order No. 32331, the Commission found all 2010 DSM spending was prudent. a. What is the most recent balance in the Idaho Energy Efficiency Rider account for expenses Incurred in 2010 but yet to be recovered by the Company? b. If ratepayers owe the Company for prudently incurred energy efficiency expenses does the Company collect an interest charge on this amount? If so, how much? c. If ratepayers owe the Company money for prudently incurred energy efficiency expenses does the Company plan to recover these funds in a single year or over several years? RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.4:. a. As of the end of 2010, the Idaho Energy Effciency Rider account unfunded balance was $17,592,938. This balance was considered prudently incurred by the Commission in Order No. 32113. Through Case No. IPC-E-10-27, Order No. 32245, Idaho Power was allowed to place $10 milion of this $17 milion of the Idaho Energy Effciency Rider account unfunded balance from 2010 into the 2011 Power Cost Adjustment ("PCA") for recovery. The amount included in the PCA is anticipated to be fully recovered by the end of May 2012. The remaining prudently incurred Rider expenses from 2010 of $7,592,938 wil be recovered by current year Rider funding. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, NW. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER - 6 . . . . b. Idaho Power is currently allowed to collect or pay 1 percent annual Interest on the balance of the Energy Efficiency account depending on whether it has a positive or negative balance. Under Commission Order No. 32109, Idaho Power is directed to collect and/or pay 1 percent annual interest on all customer deposits in 2011. c. Although timely cost recovery for DSM expenses is one of Idaho Power's goals, as a practical matter, this is somewhat difficult. The Company's ultimate goal with Rider funding is to match revenue with expenses over time. However, revenues and expenses will not match in a single year. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Willams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, N.w. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER - 7 REQUEST ..NO. 5: Idaho Power's 2011 Integrated Resource Plan forecasts . increasing energy effciency acquisitions from both existing and new programs or measures. Please describe the method for quantifying these projections. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.5: Idaho Power's methods of projecting future energy effciency acquisitions from both existing and new measures are explained in detail on pages 39-41 of the Company's 2011 Integrated Resource Plan. Copies of pages 39-41 are attached. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengilly, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Jason B. Wiliams, Corporate Counsel, Idaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 15th day of November2~ 1. . IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, N.W. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE TO IDAHO POWER. 8 . . . . Benjamin Otto (ISB No. 8292) 710 N 6th Street Boise,ID 83701 Ph: (208) 345-6933 x 12 Fax: (208) 344-0344 botto~idahoconservation.org Attorney for the Idao Conservtion Leage, the NW Energ Coaltion, and the Snake River Aliance BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTIliTIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTR OF THE APPliCATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ITS CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-ll-08 REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF NANCY HIRSH EXHIBIT 803 Staff Response to the First Production Requests of ICL, NWC, and SNA November 16, ioii EXHIBIT . . . DONALD L, HOWELL, II KARL T. KLEIN DEPUTY ATTORNEYS GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0312 IDAHO BAR NOS. 3366/5156 ¡N .i" , \1 ~1"1 i 2 a i ¡ Ii; l' ¡ 'i i: 0 I Stl'eet Address for Express Mail: 472 W. WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 Attorneys for the Commission Staff llEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF' THE APPLICATION OF ) IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY ) TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES ) FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE IN IDAHO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-1l-8 COMMISSION STAFF'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, N.W. ENERGY COALITION, AND SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilties Commission, by and through its attorneys of record, Donald L. Howell, II and Karl T. Klein, Deputy Attorneys General, responds as follows to the Idaho Conservation League, N,W. Energy Coalition and Snake River Allance's First Production Request to Commission Stafl REQUEST NO.1: Please refer to the Direct Testimony of Donn English, pages 5 - 6, where Mr. English describes the Idaho Power's plans to increase energy effciency activities over 2010 levels. Please quantify the cost of these increased energy effciency activities. RESPONSE NO.1: Staff objects to the extent this request asks Staff to speculate. Staff does not know which specific programs Idaho Power intends to implement, or which existing programs Idaho Power intends to expand. Consequel1t1y, Staff cannot quantify the cost of increased STAFF'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICL, NWEC AND SNA 1 NOVEMBER 15, 20t 1 energy effciency activities. Subject to this objection, Staff notes that financial information . provided to those present at the October 14,2011 meeting of the Idaho Power Energy Effciency Advisory Group indicates that Idaho Power has currently expensed $31,010,999 through September 30,201 i on DSM compared to $35,370,048 for the same period in 2010. Further, approximately $5.1 milion of incentive payments made through the Company's Custom Effciency program have been capitalized as a regulatory asset. Combining the expenses through September 30, 2011 with the amount capitalized indicates that Idaho Power has spent $36, I i 0,999 on DSM through September 30, 2011, which is $740,951 (2.1 %) greater than the same period in 2010. REQUEST NO.2: Please refer to Idaho Power's 2009 Demand Side Management Potential Study. a. Does the Idaho PUC staff expect Idaho Power to acquire the economic potential for energy effciency identified in this study? b. If the answer is yes, please describe how setting the Energy Effciency Rider level at 4% supports this expectation. c. If the answer is no, please explain how the Idaho PUC Staff determines if the Company is fulfillng the Commission's directive to acquire all cost effective energy effciency. . RESPONSE NO.2: Staff objects to the extent this request seeks previously unwritten and unpublished opinion or policy statements. See RP 225.01.a. Subject to this objection, Staff answers this request's subparts as follows: a. Staff has formed no such expectation. Rather, Staff expects the Company to abide by Commission Order No. 32245, which states that "Idaho Power should continue to pursue all cost-effective DSM." See Order No. 32245 at 5. b. Staff believes that setting the Energy Effciency Rider level at 4% provides the Company with suffcient revenue to abide by Commission Order No. 32245. Furthermore, per that Order, should Idaho Power identify additional cost effective DSM programs, it should "continue to pursue all cost-effective DSM - even in excess ofEnel'gy Effciency Rider revenues." ld Thus, the Company may exceed the 4% Rider fund revenue. STAFF'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICL, NWEC AND SNA 2 NOVEMBER 15,201 I . .c, The Commission did not direct the Company "to acquire all cost effective energy effciency." Rather. the Commission has directed that Idaho Power "should continue to pursue all cost-effective DSM." Staff believes the Company is making a good.faith effort at following the Commission's directive. REQUEST NO.3: Please refer to Idaho's evaluation plan for 2010 - 2012 found on pages 4 - 6 of Supplement 2 ofIdaho Power's 2010 Demand Side Management Annual Report. a. Does the Idaho PUC Staff believe this evaluation plan is suflcient both in timing and in the depth of each evaluation? b, Does the Idaho PUC staff believe the Company should increase the use of third party evaluators? c. Please quantify the Idaho PUC Staffs understanding ofthe cost of retaining a third pai1y evaluator? . RESPONSE NO.3: Staff objects to the extent this request seeks previously unwritten and unpublished opinion or policy statements. See RP 225.01.a. Subject to this objection, Staff answers this request's subparts as follows: a. Yes. StatTbelieves the Company's evaluation plan is suffcient because the plan is generally consistent with the 2009 Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") signed by representatives from Idaho's three Investor Owned Utilties and Commission Staff. b. Please see Attachment No.1 of the MOU referenced in the response to Request No, 3(a) for Staffs position on a utility's use ofthird.party evaluators. A copy of the MOU is attached to this response. c. Staff lacks suffcient information from which to quantify the cost of retaining a third. party evaluator. .STAFF'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICL, NWEC AND SNA 3 NOVEMBER i 5, 201 1 DATED at Boise, Idaho, this /')l'- day of November.. 1(1/ ,Ii- Karl T. Klein Deputy Attomey General Technical Staff witness: Randy Lobb i:umisc:prodreqlresponse/ipce 11.8dkkkll siøffresponse to otto 1_3.doc . STAFF'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICL, NWEC AND SNA 4 NOVEMBER 15,201 i