The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20110825IPC to Staff 142-151.pdf'?IDA~POR~ An IDACORP company LISA D. NORDSTROM Lead Counsel InordstromCáidahopower.com August 24, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY Jean D. Jewell, Secretary Idaho Public Utilties Commission 472 West Washington Street Boise, Idaho 83720 Re: Case No. IPC-E-11-08 General Rate Case Dear Ms. Jewell: Enclosed for filing are an original and one (1) copy of Idaho Power Company's Response to the Seventh Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power Company in the above matter. Also enclosed are three (3) copies of a non-confidential disk containing information being produced in response to Staffs Seventh Production Request. Very truly yours, £~£).7J(h~~ Lisa D. Nordstrom LDN:csb Enclosures 1221 W. Idaho St. (83702) P.O. 80x 70 Boise, 10 83707 LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) JASON B. WILLIAMS Idaho Power Company 1221 West Idaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 Inordstrom(ãidahopower.com dwalker(ãidahopower.com jwilliams(ãidahopower.com pr: C' i: II n:: n¡ "\ r: .J l.,.. L ,~~ t.lO ;,.".. 2UI l AUG 2il PH 4: 44 ft"ruiV¡'~'¡ Attorneys for Idaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR ) AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES ) AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC )SERVICE IN IDAHO. ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-11-08 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Powet' or "Company"), and in response to the Seventh Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power Company dated August 3, 2011, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 1 REQUEST NO. 142: Does the Company establish a benchmark for the following reliabilty measures? 1. System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), 2. System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI), and 3. Momentary Average Interruption Frequency Index (MAIFI). If so: (a) What is the objective of the established standard? (b) What is the benchmark for each of the past seven years (2003- 2010)? Please provide a comparison of the actual measure to the established benchmark set internally by the Company. (c) How frequently is the benchmark revised? (d) Please provide an analysis of the specific events that contributed to any major deviation from the established benchmark. (e) Please provide a summary of how the reliabilty performance benchmarks are established by the Company. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 142: 1. The Company has no formal SAIDI benchmarks. 2. Yes. Since 2006, the Company has established SAIFI performance goals for its "commercial" (rate 07, rate 09) customers. (a) These goals were established as part of the Company's employee incentive pay plan, exposing a portion of employee pay to risk, based on Company performance. There is a minimum level to be achieved, a goal, and a maximum payout leveL. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2 (b & c) The goals for each year of the program are reproduced in the table below. No other "standards" or "benchmarks" have been in place during the last seven years. Note that the "Actual" row in the table below is taken from the certified end-of-year results that are sent to and used by the finance department for incentive pay calculation. Table 1 SAIFI Reliabilty Incentive Goals and Penormance 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Goal 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 Minimum 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 Maximum 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 Actual 3.061 2.026 1.937 1.944 1;656 TBD (d) Please note that 2006 was the first year of the program and the first full year of implementation of the Outage Management System and associated business processes. The Company has not experienced a specific event that contributed to a major deviation from established benchmarks. (e) The benchmarks have been set and revised by considering the Company's past performance, including statistical variation, and by comparing this performance to its regional neighboring utilties and to other U.S. utilities. 3. Idaho Power has no formal MAIFI benchmarks. The response to this Request was prepared by Perry Van Patten, Manager, Delivery Reliability and Maintenance, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3 REQUEST NO. 143: Does the Company attempt to identify its worst-performing circuits? If so, please identify the five worst-performing circuits for each of the past three years and describe how the worst-performing circuits are identified. For each of the circuits identified, please describe any work performed or projects completed to improve the circuit's performance. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 143: The Company does not specifically designate "worst circuits." Identification of "worst circuits" has been found to be a questionable practice for improving reliabilty (Brown, R. E., Engel, M. V., and Spare, J. H. (2005). "Making sense of worst-performing feeders," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20(2), 1173-1178). Idaho Power does use a variety of reports of sub-circuit performance as part of a process for identifying the most effective strategies for improving distribution reliabilty. Performance measurements are considered in combination with engineering analysis to determine specific improvements that can be made. The response to this Request was prepared by Perry Van Patten, Manager, Delivery Reliability and Maintenance, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4 REQUEST NO. 144: Please provide a list of measurements and reports generated by the Outage Management System. Please provide examples of the reports. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 144: The Outage Management System tracks SAIFI, SAIDI and, to some extent, MAIFI (note that MAIFI is not consistently tracked across the utility industry.) A derived index is the Customer Average Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI = SAIDI/SAIFI). Idaho Power has reports that calculate these indices for the entire system, for specific circuits or operational areas, and for specified time intervals within the past five years. Reports provided by the Outage Management Systems include the following: Jumbo Report by Region Performance Indices by Region Performance Indices Active Feeders by Region Performance Indices All Feeders by Region Interruptions by Cause by Region Interruptions by Cause (System) Interruptions by Equipment Failure by Region Interruptions by Equipment Failure (System) Non-Compliance Report by Region by Feeder Samples of the reports have been provided below. The response to this Request was prepared by Rich Bauer, Manager, Grid Operations, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 5 Jumbo Report by Region DIl Criteri.: ~ 1111211-&'15l11c. AIsw:.AEq: AISy; AIT". AI Reg Als_ AI~.wAIDiir AL SUta: AIFei AIOe~il; AI ntDe: AI ~ fee De Of Da Time -OnDaTiJ Dati Cu Cwier Reim~iSS Af Bo Ou SwieaJN31 5015-4 1/1/2Q1. n:30:00 Bird - Raptor Juir/Tap Coewr 1/1/2011 20:4.2:10Not EC-lìai.:i_th. Nichls, Si:elMwi.tz d.isp 17:49 PO RESOUD HHl1 MI2 1/1/2011 19:43:00 Corroi!lon/Rot Por Cale 1/2/2011 0:17:10 5:34:00 9 50.13 NNot XC-Cold; Lech di!lp ia~4:9. ug sedazy fau2t. Broo, W..ti:an di~ eo _It. repou,¡. diqline ticket i 010006. Leach caled to canceldiiine. LNSG14 1489552 1/2/2011 15:41:00 £1ectriE:al FailurNotes XC-Cld; Disp Lech !! 407 Juii:/Tap Couctor 112/2011 17:29:07 GD2 4936561 1/3/2011 8:30:00 Heehe.i FailureNot EC-Cld; Di!l AlÌ!IU II I3EL GAVE 1' WATINS TO REPLCE 1/3/2011 10:11:33 MPU12 BK 1/3/2011 9:36:00 Plaed Maíntenance Line Conducior - l'ens.l011 14:S3:00 77:11:00 3 23i.aS NNct EC-FrlrWeath; EC-FairWea'ebr; Coniclr onsi:te, opned feer for maint.....CI TO CAY OV. .CCUTE wo 1/4/11 . _.FO POWITH TOP BUI OU OF IT. _ .WIL CAY OV CLCE AN REPLA PO ON 1/5.. G'11 F12S 1/3/2011 16~44:00 Bird - NonRpuir UnknowNot EC-cid; Dhp Leach an Schl.i'e. (l 454. F12S bl 1/312011 18:01:00 1:11:00 31 CD1S 682007 1/4/2011 7:33:00 Mecal Failure Unk 1/4/2011 3:43:34Not .£C-Cold; Di3p Merca a .it7 _ SECODAY FUSE BLB ON C PH OK NO REFUSE 2:11:00 4.35 NMA21 F2 1/4/2011 8:12:00 Plan Ka'tnanceNets Lit'tle onJlite, opeed fuse for _into 1/4/2011 14:44:00 W.l11 615815 1/4/2011 8,49:00 i:nk S.d.tc - Maual 1/4/2011 13:17:51 4:29:00Not EC-FairWea.thi; Anign to CoEmck l 1040 ... .REPLA 25 A TR:i FUSE..GO VOLTAG. _NO CASE ro._ NMA21 65405 1/4/2011 9:02:QO Plan MaineenaceNo Littole onsi.te, oped jumr for aaint No Ti:oule 1/4/2011 14:41:00 N'A20 756041 1/4/2011 10:11:00 Meehc:al Failure Tr_.toii:No E.C-CoUt; D:iJlp Mercao II 1014. CAYON CR WrL CHGE O/S TlSFO 1/4/2011 1i:21:00 Tti,...\u 16,:eii OSS4i07 AM I'hi..i Performance Indices by Region Rv 1111211.8115111e- AI~;A1Equ AI_ A'T"" AI MAIM 35.00!iIAVO. 4.00Rf1 0.93WF1 insEf1: (1.35JF1 Ð.?4 Distribution Reliability Rertiiig SystePeerP6rformoe Indices By Reion-- AI,- AIOevio AI l~o.Yio: AI~: ::~AI AI0i Al CACAVG""WfEf ""SAVG'RF3:Wf3:Ef' LOC""LOCOAVGRl4'Wf4:"4 12.63'"0""0.251.00 25.04,.61200250.38 S.OO1.00loi0.20US .-c._,-e-..""00'--..""....MAll'J,-..CA¡-..SAOl,-.."",-..~/ ~Oi c="-,.O.'U8 1.~790 Cçui SOt:_5830:55 2.~828 Rert Tatau' IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 6 Performance Indices Active Feeders by Region Distribution Reliability Rerting Syste Fer Performce IndicesActive Feers by Reion Cri.~l"iii;..".,mi211.ll15J11 -AI Si:AI Ift~o.ic AIc.,AI Sta:AI F_AIs.AI ~Ai AI Dnii:AIE~AS Di:Al..AIT".AI MAmA'"'5.00 CA 12.63 SAAX 25."LOCOM 800MAVG4.00 CAVG 138 SAVG:,..LOCOAVG"1.00RF10.93 RF,0..Rf3:1.25 RF4:1.02Wl1025Wl2.0.25 WF'0.25 W'4:0.20EF10.35 EF2.1.00 EF.0.38 EF4 1.38"0.74-Ca -hI hI hI ''''OF'CAIOI SAlOl SAIFIM......""i To'"-e-i--i_-F_F_....""""''Aff_H".."""-i -i -i "'---------------..11 ,.2 .0.04 46.51 2.'..0.9995 6-431"1.2917 4.1538 3.2Hi9"""LS87 11 52 11 139.04 0.37 96.2 3613 6133 0.9993 14.6021 1.6976 6.2144 3.6606""".".21 1 83.:2:0.25 39.7 957 1655 0.9996 3.osoa 1.7290 :;L1748 1.83&3""11 usa 7 lS S 15.24 0.98 25.2 SSl 00.0.9.9.99 8.4664 1.6066 1.1.98 0.7156 CD12 .OO 7 "0 9.12:1.32 16.6 He 12:1.0000 6.7680 0.952:7 0.1989 0.20B7""13 50S ,.0 25.21 0.32 12.3 13S 151 1.0000 0.2732 l.iisa 0.4287 0.3842""14 1594 ,,,21.07 0.24 '.1 so so 1.0000 3.2068 1.3367 0.0610 0.0605""15 1352 .17 ,25.57 0.66 33.2 1192 2127 0.9937 1.3606 1.7843 2.5296 1.4176 CDW16 1094 1 lS 0 64.71 0.23 28.9 ...1601 0.9997 0.6526 2.31'7 2.3533 1.0156""17 10:n 2 17 1 74.10 0.23 46.1 U.28.0.9999 7.6216 2.0640 0.4460 C.a61CH11138222036.90 0.60 42.6 401 7S2 0_')999 0.5910 1.8756 0.8751 0.4666 CH12 130a 4 0 13.46 0.30 B.O 1.0000 0.0000 1-9716 0.1503 0.0762=18 1414 .,21.97 0.27 15.4 ..330 1.0000 0.0000 3.70S7 0.3753 0.1012CH141445"24.S1 fLU 19.9 357 .20 0.9999 4.7437 0.9680 1.0308 1.0649CH151715.44 1.10 2815 1651 0.9999 4.4006 0.5864 1.0781 1.S38S=10 1357 ,19.35 0.26 12.2 30S 70.0.9999 0.0000 2.5191 0.9104 0.3614CH171718.22.70 0.18 7..8 21 3B 1.0000 0.0000 1.7999 0.0354 0.0197 CH18 1327 4 27.32 0.14 B.B 1330 2307 0.9997 3.2074 1_7346 2.7957 1.6116""11 3'.11.01 0.36 57 10.0.9990 1.44'7 2.8764 8.7876 3.0551 Performance Indices All Feeders by Region 9~i Distribtion Reitability Rerting Syste DRFerPerformceIndices ..nluJlORPcom;:W All Feers by Reion Criteria.:..m1211-&l15t11 -AI --AI lirOevit AIC-Al Si::AI F.-AI~AI 0p AÆ AI ""'"AIE_AI DG:AlSyste:ASTyp:AIMA "00 CA 12.63 SA:25.04 LOCOM 800MAFVG:'00 CAVG:1.36 SAVG .68 lOCOAVG.1.00RF10.93 RF2 0.89 Rf3:1.20 RF4-:1.02Wf1.0.25 Wf2.025 1N3:0.25 WF4:0.20EF0."En 1.00 EF3:038 EF4 1.38F1:0.74Cac..'of 'of 'of NAIF!""01 SAIDI SAFlM--..-"'i T""""ev""-i_-(-F'-""........_eM Aff""_eM AS ........---------------BI.l1 ..2 0 0.04 46_51 2. ...Q.9996 6.4317 1.2!l7 4.153B -,L21S9"""1581 ii 02 ii 139.04 0.37 96.2 3613 6133 0.9993 14.6021 1.6916 6.2:144 3.6606BO42.3..21 1 83.24 0.25 39.7 "7 165.0.9996 3.0508 1-12:90 3.114a 1.8363 CD11 ilSB 7 15 S 15.24 0.9B 25.l SSL ee,0.9999 B.4864 1.6066 1.1Ua 0.7156 CC'12 ...7 12 0 9.12 1.32 16.6 ".12l 1.0000 5.76S0 0.9527 0.19B9 O.ZOS?CD13 SOS 3 .0 25..21 0.32 12.3 13S ISl 1.0000 0.2732 1.1158 0.4297 0.3842CD1415943.,21.07 0.24 '.1 .,.,1.0000 3.2068 1.3387 0.OB10 0.0605 CD15 1352 4 17 0 25.57 0.66 3-3.2 1192:2127 Q.9997 1.3606 1.7843 2.5296 1.4176cmi61094118064.71 0.2:3 2B.9 ..,1601 0.9997 0.6526 2.3171 2.3M3 1-0156CD171027217174.10 0.23 46.1 13.2es 0.9999 7.6216 2-Q640 0.-460 O.21&iciii138l222036.90 0.60 4..0 401 702 0.9999-0.5310 1.8756 0.8751 Q_4666ci12130B04013.46 0.30 8.0 62 122-1.0000 0.0000 1.9716 0_1503 O.01~2:ci..1414 0 .0 21.97 0.27 15.4 e.330 1.0000 0.0000 3.7087 0.3753 CL1012ci141445.2 24.81 0.48 13.9 'S7 926 0.9999 4.7437 0_9680 1_0309 1.0649ci152462,4 15.44 1.10 24.4 2815 1651 0.9'9-'4..4006 0.5864 1.0781 1.8385 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 7 ¡¡ Caym ¡¡ Co¡¡ Ea..-.õlW.. Interruptions by Cause by Region a.~Distribtion Reliabili ty Rerting Syste Distribtion Interrutton by cause by Reon llA ai=M~ClID" Re: AI_ AI () Ar: AIIl Al ~:AIFee: AI0e AI Criteria: Ra: 1/1ti11.8I5111Ca AISu Ca: AIEq AI_ AITyp AI C_one-_-N~--1ù~Cota~ei ~Eq_Fm.F..Ob.~T..Tri)..i.r. Ac(li_)Li..i.SM~~'U(S.h)i.-.Lo of Sq . StLoofSq- T_MoooFm.~(T~ llOe:AJ #.0£ %0£ %ofTot ~#0£ %oiTob #0£ %ofTob R. ~ Ou Ou., C' ~ :HOoInte Inte Mob: ~ Sw Swtc ! Mi ! 100 Mi Hom Ou &u Ou ! Ou----------9.00 0 0.00 (tOO 0.02 1.68 3,27357 4.51 41.440.80 0 0.00 0.00 0.02 153 598.69 0.&2 85.531.1 0 0.00 0.00 0.62 1.76 453.45 0.62 41.220.46 0 0.00 0.00 003 2.'/9 1,27.1 1.69 3(.927.18 ¡ 035 0.00 0.02 1.95 3)7Q.95 450 51.920.57 0 0.00 0.00 0.01 l.0 40.0 0.55 80.617.74 0 0.00 (LOO 6.02 1.66 9,515.39 13.1& 140.81¡59 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 2.9 4,95.2 6.79 352.52o.so 0 0.00 0.00 G.2 1.9 20622 02& 29.46O.il 0 0.00 0.00 O.OL 082 LO.08 0.04 30.0&3.42 1 0.35 0.00 O.O 1.8 845.9' U6 28.20.11 0 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.01 4.20 G.l 42ß0.11 0 ¡lOG 0.00 OJH un 101.85 0.14 101.851.5 0 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.63 3.025.26 4.H¡: 215.1320.80 0 0,00 0.00 0.03 2,St 1.%8.2 2.63 212.60o.so 0 0.00 0.00 0.04 l.9 3,05333 4.20 4l6.1912.64 :3 1.05 0.00 0.02 i.9 11,260.67 15.50 101.5~l ~8 mi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 79 T II 4 63 5 68 14 T ¡ iO 1 I II ,il I Interruptions by Cause (System) ...-...-~""e_Cuom fJ EqEJFaieFor ot~,KI,TreTri)--..-(l'"¡""LoaSlræfel__(S,lc)loo Harlosof Su-stlo of Su - TranMe Fd.Mo (1_)NoT.-_E_Ot (de in Co) ot PC CicuOtUt-.loa--.sa.._""-_(S,B-.iTteeg UnlwnUflfarUtiO;frrv_VehCo~fir Distribution Re1iabi1ity Rerting Syste Distribution Interrutions Syste Wide DR Criteria:Ra 1111211 -&15111ca: Al SU ca: AIEq: AtSyem: AI"" AI _ AISl AIOp Ar: AIOì AL Su:AlFee" AtDe Al 1net De: AI #0£ %of %cfTot Cuom#0£ '%ofTot #Om %ofTot Re Rglêl UB ~ Cæ Cl IrOuinter In~ Mota Momta Swcl8 s,tc ~ il00Mi HouOu HoOB fOi 653 8.46 0.11 0.00 0.01 1.27 31,32.15 4.03 49.5154 0.70 0.08 0.00 OA)! l.53,O83.69 0.38 :57.11so H14 iU)4 0.00 0.02 UQ 3,524.20 0.44 44.0533 1U3 0.00 (tOO 0.01 1.7 2,193..5 0.27 66.47489 6.34 0.19 0.00 O.Øl 1.71 114,9.66 14.33 135.1576 0.9 1 0-.04 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,44822 tUB 19.06613 794 6: 0.23 0.00 OdH 1.46 61,178.08 7.63 99.&074 0.% 1 O.íl 100.00 1101 l.4 3,298.03 1.03 112.1451 0.66 2 0.08 0.00 0.02 HiI 1,608.50 tt.. 31.5411 0.14 -0 (1"00 0.00 OJ)! un 54.42 O.OL 49-_49-268 3.47 13 0.:5 0.00 0.01 1.56 15.79.23 3.21 %.237 0.09 4 ¡US 0.00 0.01 0.79 94.97 (un 13.578 0.10 0 OJJO 0.00 G.Ol 0.81 5,391.49 0.67 673_9476 0.9 0 000 0.00 0.:01 1.0 &,89331 1.1 117Ji212 0.16 2 0.08 0.00 0.00 1:97 10,0'.._47 L25 835.2193 11: 13 0.88 0.00 (un us .39.016.87 4.86 419.54892 1156 12 0.46 0.00 OJH 1.0 158,9.78 19.74 177.5211 0.14 235:5 90.13 (tOO 0.00 0.01 419.02 0.05 3&.0917 022 49 1.8 0.00 0.00 0.43 63.10 0.01 3_7149 0.63 1 0.04 0.00 0.02 1.9 372.52 0.05 7.60390 5.05 9' 0.34 0.00 0_01 1.6 24,419.54 3.04 -62.6413 0.17 Ú 0.00 0.00 OJ)2 1.99 1.443.00 0.18 ILL.OO5 0.06 0 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.2 2,70.98 032 514.214 0-18 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 1.4 1,80.27 (L21 128.731106 1433 19 0.00 (un l.5 6&63430 8-.55 62.06 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 8 St..c.B:.N~_.-CoioDiCotam~ll""EI_E1F3UF~Ob.~TfHTri)-"" L: Ai (L"enod)Li_LQaShfaLoiUii (S!, I~)i.!ù~i. of Suly - srLo ofSi. Tanon~Fai-_(T'-NoTtteNot~E"'atOt (~.i eoJOthe!P C~tOte-Utity"'~..Pi Matei Interruptions by Equipment Failure by Region ¡¡ C&BiCaIi Easti Soti wes -/G---Bu~e-Coor tlfr~"'-CoayCM~Cool C8er~Cusom EquDa logtAnzeDe MoraGi~_---JtJap ConÜ\Co-SlUn Coor - Ten--(R)NoT_","OIPoer .C8--~_""M'Se XfmlX--Swch - Au Swlch-M4lTowerstT""_ UnkwnVauX1ndV__W.._ HlU Il A¡l(OOFPcear,' Distribution Reliability Rerting Syste Distribution Ontas by Eqipmt by Reon Criteri: Ra: 1/11211 _ 8I15l11Ca: A.Su Ca: A. Eq: A.Sy. A.Typ: A. ~:A.F_: AlDe: AI IiDe: AIRe: AlSb: AlOp Ar: A._ AL CaEet.A;G A.-iic. Citm-Coor ClieDe CofTumioniSplicec.i Catt ""~c. Eeti.",_Pio/lr..dæti.rr", c.!JC.."'-S1Lin Co - T enMm_y~..)'J..T~.. #of %of %ofTot ~"of %ofTou #Of %ofT.. - - am am c. c. 1l00In_io lni. __ ~ s.w. - ~ ¡ 100_ 1l00 1l00 lOo.. 6 2.10 0 0.00 0.01 0.63 21755 0.30 5439o 0.00 0 0.00 0.02 1.64 1,512.9 2.0& 42.03Q 0.00 0 1100 0.01 1.2 451.00 0.62 225.50o 0.00 0 0.00 0.09 9.08 &3.87 0.12 83.87o 0.00 0 0.00 0.01 o.n 530 0.01 530o 0.00 0 0.00 002 1.7 1,2.05 1.69 21.17o 0.00 0 0.00 0.03 2.54 6520 009 6520o 000 0 0.00 O.G l.0 1,516.55 2.09 10833o 0.00 0 0.00 0.01 1.46 63.73 0.09 3La7o 0.00 0 0.00 0.111 2.116 9.13 0111 4.7o 0.00 0 0.00 0.01 l.7 27410 038 39.16o 0.00 0 0.00 0.02 1.1 1,22l.7 1.68 31.3I 035 0 0.00 0.02 2.46 2,887.9 3.9 34.79o 0.00 0 0.00 0..02 1.7 24,671.92 33.95 iro.21o 0.00 0 0.00 0.03 l.l2 1222& 0.17 10.19 1 OH OM OM " 1ft A7ì¡i1i fll;" 1'1,,51 4 0.46 36 4.10 023 I O.ll I 0.11 58 6.61 I 0.11 14 U9 2 0.23 2 0.2 0.80 39 4.44 &3 9.45 154 17.54 12 l.77.". Interruptions by Equipment Failure (System) Distribution ReliabiHty Rerting Syste Distribtion OUtas by Eqipmt Syste Wide Criteria:Ra 1111211.8115111Cau" AlSu Ca: AlEq, AlSyem AIT,. AI _. AISte: AI()Area:AIDi AL Sl: AIFee: Al~ Al lnOe: AI ..-- AnoriG .Mly~BiCoåDore_Co~k~Con= ClwDuCo~Correr'3l:Coiuo1Ca~Wtt.t~~Ctom Eqt Da l.iAi!Moto De M01Jiit/Bnclm~Asyi.MIiP:iJirrap~Li~-S1LinCo-T~~ As (Rve)NoT:wOtUtityp-""Pre Re RTU!Ctm11;'h Lo1i~iIt XfiX6æer--Sw.A1lteeh-Mm #of %0£ %oíTot Cu#-af %ofTot #of %ofTou ~ Ree4 Oi OÐ Cuom Cl HoOuInte In Mota Mobf ~ Swtc ~ ~ ~ ~ ! Cl 13 0.17 0.27 0.00 0.01 1.01 7&1.9 9.10 6023178 2.1 0.1)4 0,00 0.02 U4 23.131.9 2.118 129.9513 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.57 6,18.76 0.81 501.44:3 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.03 2.61 88.0 0.01 19.3í1 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0_68. 1-94 0.00 1.9456 033 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.4 1.13_62 0.14 20..! 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.02 1_98 3.98 0.00 3.98554 7.18 0.15 0_00 0.02 U5 22,497.80 2.8( 40.6115 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.02 2.32 47,843.91 5.96 3,189.59210 2.71 0.04 0.00 0.01 1.28 34.248.86 4.27 163.0923 0.30 0.04 0.00 0.01 US 4,837.99 0.60 210.352 0_03 0.00 0.00 0.04 3_63 22_94 0.0 112.4735 0-45 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.44 2,03SJJ4 0.. 58.253 OJl4 (t.oo 0.00 (102 1.6 496.&8 0.06 165.6344 0.57 0.00 (\'OO 0.01 1.1 17.710.09 2.21 40.5054 0.70 0.08 0.00 0.02 1.9 11,401.68 1.42 211.14285 3.69 1 0.04 0.00 0.01 1.3 16,463.. 2.05 57.77434 5.62 7 0.17 (1.00 0.02 1.60 25.341.7 3.16 58.391171 16.4-1 23 O.SS 100.00 om 1.46 215,767.2 26.89 169.7697 126 0 0_00 0.00 0.02 1.77 950.54 0.12 9.00% 1.24 14 0.54 0.00 0.02 un 5,171.6 0.64 53.87.3 0.04 0 0.00 0.00 (un 1.0 46.2 0.06 153.41595 7.71 20 o.n 0.00 0.(11 1.95 70,101.67 8.74 117.si0.09 0: 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.8 6S7.5S 0.09 98220.G 0 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.71 6.39 0.00 6390.03 0 0.00 ll.oo 0.16 15.3 346.67 0.04 173.330_61 9 0.34 0.00 0.02 US 14,68.83 :1.3 312.490.98 7 0.27 0.00 0.02 UO 27.472.98 3.42 361.4920.38 32 1.2 (1.00 o.m 1.2 8S,1nii 10.62 54.15 1 2 47 76 1573 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 9 Non-Compliance Report by Region by Feeder Criteria: Dis:tribtion Re.1i.ability Rertin Syste No Coliat; Feers DRR BLI1 lO41 Bm42 _ 1111211 (211 Q1)-8I15111 (211 (3)_.AI-- AI-Su:..AI AICa,. Fee T"imPer 2Q04 Q3 - 2004 Q3 1D 12 MO SAIFI: 2. of 3 values abve 'the uppr warning l:it;_ID QtY (Anuaií:aed) SUFI: 2 of 3 values abe thR uppz Wiii:niqlit. 2004 Q4 - 2004 Q4 ID 12 MO SAIFI: Vaiue is ab t;e upper tbre3ho1d. 2010 Q4 - 2010 Q4 ID 12 MO SAIDI: Va.ue is sb .1; upper ehre!lhoJ..2Ql1 Q'l - 2011 Ql ID 12 MO SAIDI: Value is abvetoe uppr threshold.ID 12 MONT SAIFI: Value ig above the uppr thre!lholiL2011 '02 - 2011 (22. ID 12 MO SAIDI: Value is above the uppr threshold.ID 12 MONT SUFI: Valua is aÐVQ the upper thra51hoi.. ¡OLL Q3 - 2011. Q3 ID 12 MOlI SAIDI: VlÙua is iive the uppr thrailho1d. ID 12 MO SAIDI: 2. of :3 ViUueB above th uppr warnin limt. ID 12 MO SAIFI: 2. of 3 vaues abve th uppr waL l:it.ID QUTERLY (AnualizQd) 5AIFI:2 of 3 valUE!1 abe the uppi: w-a.rinq limit_ 2000 Q4 - 2000 Q4 ID 12 MQ SAIDI: Va.1Uê is abe the uppr 'Ce!!hold.2001 21 - 2001 Ql ID 12 MO SAIDI: Value 1.9 abe the uppi: theshold.ID 12 MO SAIFI: Value Lsi abe the uppi: theshold. 2001 Q2 - 2001 Q2 ID 12 MO SAlOl: Value i.! abe the uppi: thshod.ID 12 MO SAIFI: Value 1.9 abe the upper thnHJhold. 2001 Q3 - 2001 Q3 ID 12 MO SAIDI: i of :3 values ab the Uppei warnin limt. 19-99 ~i- 19:99 Ql ID 12 MONT SAII: Value is abve the uppr thr-egho1d. 19-99 23- 1:9:99 23 ID 12 MONT SAIDI: vaiue is abve t.he upper threshoW. ID 12 MONT SAII: 2: of 3 values abe the upr warnq' llt. 1999 Q4 - 19-99- Q4 ID 12 MO SAIDI: Value i9 abve the uppr threshold. 2000 Q1 - 2000 Q1 ID 12 MONT SAIDI: Value i.s abVêth uppr threshold. 2000 Q2 - 2000 Q.2 ID 12 MOH' SAIDI: Value is' $hve th uppr thresho1d. iO 12 MONT SArFI: Value is abvet.he upper thr-eshold. 2000 Q3 - 2000 Q3 ID 12 MONT SAIDI: Value is abve the uppr threshoid. ID 12 MONT SAII: 2 of 3 values abe the upr wai:q lit.IO 12 MO BAIFI: 2 of 3 vaue!! abe the uppr warninq lim-e.ID QUARTEY !Anuaized) SAIFI: 2 of 3 values abe the upp.r wa.niing H.mt. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 10 REQUEST NO. 145: Please provide a list of all major new and rehabiltation transmission projects completed within the past three years that were under taken for purposes of meeting NERC Reliability Standards. For each project, please identify the NERC standard(s) that each project was intended to satisfy, the cost of each project assigned to Idaho, and the date of completion of each project. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 145: Please see the table below. Reliabilty Project Idaho Completion Project Standard Cost Cost * Date Quartz - Shunt Capacitor Bank TPL-002 $681,682 $652,165 11/19/2009 Blackfoot - Replace wave trap on GSHN terminal FAC-008/009 $38,777 $37,098 5/24/2010 Ontario - Replace wave trap on Quartz terminal and remove wave trap on Emmett terminal FAC-008/009 $15,771 $15,088 10/5/2010 Quart - Replace wave trap on Ontario terminal FAC-008/009 $15,951 $15,260 10/5/2010 Blackfoot - Replace wave trap on Donn terminal FAC-008/009 $18,527 $17,725 4/22/2010 Nampa - Replace wave trap on the Caldwell-Bowmont terminal FAC-008/009 $19,045 $18,220 5/21/2010 Emmett - Replace 102A circuit breaker FAC-008/009 $90,965 $87,026 5/4/2010 Danskin - Replace 795 MCM ACSR jumpers on Mountain Home Junction 1 terminal FAC-008/009 $2,759 $2,640 6/14/2010 Lower Malad Power - Upgrade relay on Mountain Home Junction 1 line FAC-008/009 $188,911 $180,731 10/5/2010 Mountain Home Junction 1 - Upgrade relay on LMPR-MNJ1 line to FAC-008/009 $18,538 $17,735 6/7/2010 Midpoint - Upgrade Boise Bench #3 Line Relays FAC-008/009 $168,896 $161,583 5/20/2010 Boise Bench - Install communications equipment and change relay settings as part of MPSN relay upgrades FAC-008/009 $43,856 $41,957 5/20/2011 * The allocation of these costs is based on the 2011 test year jurisdictional separation study. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 11 The response to this Request was prepared by David Angell, Delivery Planning Manager, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 12 REQUEST NO. 146: Please list and summarize the cause for any NERCIWECC penalties or fines imposed, either through audit or self-reporting, during the past three year period. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 146: North American Electric Reliabilty Corporation ("NERC")/Western Electricity Coordinating Council ("WECC") assessed a total penalty of $140,000 for violations of mandatory reliability and Critical Infrastructure Protection ("CIP") standards identified during a Reliabilty Standards Audit performed in 2009. Additionally, Idaho Power was assessed $28,000 in penalties arising from self- reports associated with violations of mandatory reliabilty and CIP standards that occurred in 2009 and 2010. In particular, NERC/wECC imposed, and Idaho Power paid, a penalty of $130,000 for violations of mandatory reliabilty and CIP standards identified during a Reliability Standards Audit in 2009. The violations identified in the Reliability Standards Audit related to the followings standards: COM 0001-1, EOP-001-1, EOP-005-1, FAC- 013, PRC 005-1, VAR-001-1, CIP 001-1, CIP 0002-1, CIP 003-1, CIP 004-1, CIP 007-1. Additionally, WECC imposed, and Idaho Power paid, a penalty of $10,000 for a separate violation of mandatory reliabilty standard FAC-013 related to events in 2009. NERCI WECC imposed, but Idaho Power has not yet been biled, a total of $28,000 for self-reported violations of the following mandatory reliabilty and CIP standards: INT 001, PRC 005, VAR 002b-1, CIP 004, CIP 0006, and TOP 007. The response to this Request was prepared by Richard J. Garlish, Director of Regulatory Compliance and Senior Counsel, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY -13 REQUEST NO. 147: Has the Company performed or completed a business case analysis/benefit-cost study for the AMI project? If so, please provide a current status report. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 147: The Company prepared a business case/benefit-cost study for the Advanced Metering Infrastructure ("AMI") project that was summarized in the "AMI Implementation Plan" dated August 31, 2007. The business case/benefit-cost study was provided in Idaho Power Company's Response to Staff's First Production Request in Case No. IPC-E-08-16. Please see the non- confidential CD for a copy of that same study. In Order No. 30726 approving the Application, Staff acknowledged, "The immediate benefits offered by the proposed AMI technology are enough to justify its implementation." The Company has not performed any new cost/benefit studies. As of June 30, 2011, Idaho Power has exchanged 402,066 meters across its service territory, or 87 percent of total expected exchanges, with expenses totaling $64.4 milion. The Company anticipates installing approximately 60,000 additional meters and completing 23 substations upgrades by year-end for total expenditures of approximately $74.5 million, as originally estimated. The response to this Request was prepared by Courtney Waites, Regulatory Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 14 REQUEST NO. 148: Please list dates, SAIDI, and primary cause for all Major Events as defined by Reliabilty Standard IEEE 1366-2003 for the past three years. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 148: The IEEE 1366-2003 Major Event days for 2008-2010 are as follows: Date SAIDI Cause 02/07/2008 10.76 Loss of supply (transmission) weather related OS/20/2008 9.97 Adverse weather causing tree/vegetation related outages 12/13/2008 9.15 High winds causing transmission line failures 03/29/2009 9.76 Adverse weather, loss of supply, tree vegetation 10/04/2009 8.50 Snow and ice build up on lines 10/13/2009 29.09 Equipment failure at substation 10/26/2009 12.12 Adverse weather, loss of supply, mechanical failures 12/24/2009 29.88 Heavy snow,equipment failures (transmission and distribution) 06/28/2010 22.25 High winds causing tree/vegetation outages 08/21/2010 32.73 High winds and range fires 08/22/2010 16.44 High wind and range fires 12/20/2010 17.91 Heavy snow and ice 12/28/2010 17.91 Heavy snow and ice 12/29/2010 13.88 Heavy snow and ice The response to this Request was prepared by Perry Van Patten, Manager, Delivery Reliabilty and Maintenance, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY -15 REQUEST NO. 149: Does the Company categorize distribution level outages by controllable and uncontrollable events? If so, please provide the definitions the Company utilizes to identify these types of outages. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 149: Idaho Power does not categorize outages as "controllable" and "uncontrollable." The response to this Request was prepared by Perry Van Patten, Manager, Delivery Reliability and Maintenance, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 16 REQUEST NO. 150: For the prior three years, please list significant projects and their associated costs for upgrades to distribution substations, including the installation of SCADA or other distribution automation systems. Please identify if the projects were to increase capacity (sic) meet reliabilty standards, or both. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 150: Please see the Excel file provided on the non-confidential CD. The response to this Request was prepared by Larry Tuckness, Finance Team Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 17 REQUEST NO. 151: Please provide any cost/benefit analysis and/or other justification for each transmission project provided in response to Request No. 145. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 151: Please see the table below. Project Quartz - Shunt Capacitor Bank Justification Quart station 138 kilovolt ("kV") bus voltage drops 12 percent for the loss of the Brownlee- Quart-La Grande 230 kV line or the Quart 230/138 kV transformer. NERCIWECC criteria allow for only a 5 percent drop in voltage on load busses for an N-1 event. In addition to meeting the reliabilty standard, the shunt capacitor bank provides Idaho Powets Grid Operations personnel another device to manage system voltage in eastern Oregon. Blackfoot - Replace wave trap on GSHN terminal The prior wave trap was rated for 400 amps, which is below the line conductor continuous rating of 610 amps and 59 percent of the emergency rating of 685 amps. Failure to replace the wave trap would require a reduction of the Bridger West transfer path, which would compromise the ability to import the Jim Bridger generation. Ontario - Replace wave trap on Quart terminal and remove wave trap on Emmett terminal The prior wave trap was rated for 400 amps, which is below the line conductor continuous rating of 610 amps and 59 percent of the emergency rating of 685 amps. Failure to replace the wave trap would require a reduction of the Brownlee East transfer path, which would compromise the abilty to serve load. Quart - Replace wave trap on Ontario terminal The prior wave trap was rated for 400 amps, which is below the line conductor continuous rating of 610 amps and 59 percent of the emergency rating of 685 amps. Failure to replace the wave trap would require a reduction of the Brownlee East transfer path which would compromise the abilty to serve load. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 18 Blackfoot - Replace wave trap on Don terminal The prior wave trap was rated for 400 amps, which is below the line conductor continuous rating of 610 amps and 59 percent of the emergency rating of 685 amps. Failure to replace the wave trap would require a reduction of the Bridger West transfer path, which would compromise the ability to import the Jim Bridger generation. Nampa - Replace wave trap on the Caldwell-Bowmont terminal The prior wave trap was rated for 400 amps, which is below the line conductor continuous rating of 875 amps and 41 percent of the emergency rating of 985 amps. Failure to replace the wave trap would require a reduction of the Brownlee East transfer path, which would compromise the abilty to serve load. Emmet - Replace 102A circuit breaker The prior current transformers were limited to 600 amps, which is 66 percent of the winter emergency rating of 916 amps. Failure to replace the current transformers would require a reduction of the Brownlee East transfer path, which would compromise the ability to serve load. Danskin - Replace 795 MCM ACSR jumpers on Mountain Home Junction 1 terminal The prior jumpers were limited to 1223 amps, which is 88 percent of the line emergency rating of 1396 amps. Failure to replace the jumpers would limit the Danskin power generation capability Lower Malad Power - Upgrade relay on Mountain Home Junction 1 line The prior relay was limited to 360 amps, which is 44 percent of the line emergency rating of 823 amps. Failure to replace the relays would require lowering the rating of the Midpoint West transfer path. Lowering the rating of this path would reduce the abilty to integrate new resources in the Magic Valley and eastern Idaho. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 19 Mountain Home Junction 1 - Upgrade relay on LMPR-MNJ1 line to The prior relay was limited to 480 amps, which is 58 percent of the line emergency rating of 823 amps. Failure to replace the relays would require lowering the rating of the Midpoint West transfer path. Lowering the rating of this path would reduce the ability to integrate new resources east of Mountain Home, the Magic Valley, and eastern Idaho. Midpoint - Upgrade Boise Bench #3 Line Relays The prior relay was limited to 1200 amps, which is 71 percent of the line emergency rating of 1700 amps. Failure to replace the relays would require lowering the rating of the Midpoint West transfer path. Lowering the rating of this path would reduce the ability to integrate new resources in the Magic Valley and eastern Idaho. Boise Bench - Install communications equipment and change relay settings as part of MPSN relay upgrades The prior relay was limited to 1200 amps, which is 71 percent of the line emergency rating of 1700 amps. Failure to replace the relays would require lowering the rating of the Midpoint West transfer path. Lowering the rating of this path would reduce the abilty to integrate new resources in the Magic Valley and eastern Idaho. The response to this Request was prepared by David Angell, Delivery Planning Manager, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 24th day of August 2011. Æ12,~~LISA D. NORDSROM iAttorney for Idaho-Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 24th day of August 2011 I served a true and correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Donald L. Howell, II Karl T. Klein Deputy Attorneys General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington (83702) P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email Don.HoweIlCâpuc.idaho.gov Karl. Klein(apuc.idaho.gov Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Peter J. Richardson Gregory M. Adams RICHARDSON & O'LEARY, PLLC 515 North 2ih Street (83702) P.O. Box 7218 Boise, Idaho 83707 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email peter(arichardsonandolearv.com greg(arichardsonandolearv.com Dr. Don Reading Ben Johnson Associates, Inc. 6070 Hil Road Boise, Idaho 83703 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email dr(abenjohnsonassociates.com Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. Eric L. Olsen RACINE, OLSON, NYE, BUDGE & BAILEY, CHARTERED 201 East Center P.O. Box 1391 Pocatello, Idaho 83204-1391 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email elo(aracinelaw.net Anthony Yankel 29814 Lake Road Bay Village, Ohio 44140 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email tony(ayankel.net IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY.. 21 The Kroger Co. Kurt J. Boehm BOEHM, KURTZ & LOWRY 36 East Seventh Street, Suite 1510 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Kevin Higgins Energy Strategies, LLC 215 South State Street, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Micron Technology, Inc. MaryV. York HOLLAND & HART LLP 101 South Capital Boulevard, Suite 1400 Boise, Idaho 83702 Richard E. Malmgren Senior Assistant General Counsel Micron Technology, Inc. 800 South Federal Way Boise, Idaho 83716 The United States Department of Energy Arthur Perry Bruder, Attorney-Advisor United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20585 Dwight D. Etheridge Exeter Associates, Inc. 10480 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -- Email kboehmCâBKLlawfirm.com jrhCâbattisher.com Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -- Email khigginscaenergystrat.com Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -- Email myorkcahollandhart.com tnelsoncaholland hart. com madavidsoncaholland hart. com fsch midtcaholland hart. com I nbuchanancaholland hart. com Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -- Email remalmgrencamicron.com Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -- Email Arthur.brudercahQ.doe.gov Steven. portercahq. doe .gov Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -- Email detheridgecaexeterassociates.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 22 Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho Brad M. Purdy Attorney at Law 2019 North 1 ih Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email bmpurdy(ihotmail.com Idaho Conservation League Benjamin J. Otto Idaho Conservation League 710 North Sixth Street (83702) P.O. Box 844 Boise, Idaho 83701 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email botto(iidahoconservation.org Snake River Allance Ken Miler Snake River Alliance P.O. Box 1731 Boise, Idaho 83701 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email kmiler(isnakeriverallance.org NW Energy Coalition Nancy Hirsh, Policy Director NW Energy Coalition 811 First Avenue, Suite 305 Seattle, Washington 98104 Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -2 Email nancy(inwenergy.org cfl)~d~Lisa D. Nordstro IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE SEVENTH PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 23