Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100827IPC to Staff 1-5.pdfREeE r"~esIDA~POR~ An IDACORP Company LISA D. NORDSTROM Lead Counsel InordstromØiidahopower.com August 27, 2010 VIA HAND DELIVERY Jean D. Jewell, Secretary Idaho Public Utilties Commission 472 West Washington Street P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Re: Case No. IPC-E-10-09 IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER DESIGNA TlNG THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY RIDER FUNDS SPENT BY THE COMPANY DURING 2008-2009 AS PRUDENTLY INCURRED EXPENSES Dear Ms. Jewell: Enclosed for filng please find an original and three (3) copies of Idaho Power Company's Response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power Company in the above matter. Very truly yours,£-lJe,~ Lisa D. Nordstrom LDN:csb Enclosures 1221 W. Idaho St. (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise. ID 83707 LISA D. NORDSTROM (ISB No. 5733) DONOVAN E. WALKER (ISB No. 5921) Idaho Power Company P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5825 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 InordstromCâidahopower.com dwalkerCâidahopower.com Attorneys for Idaho Power Company Street Address for Express Mail: 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, Idaho 83702 RECE 211nAUG 21 Pt1li: 01 tDß\~lOi iTill"~::~v .. i 1\..-.; BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER DESIGNATING THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY RIDER FUNDS SPENT BY THE COMPANY DURING 2008-2009 AS PRUDENTLY INCURRED EXPENSES. ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-10-09 ) ) IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S ) RESPONSE TO THE FIRST ) PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE ) COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO ) POWER COMPANY ) COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Powet' or "Company"), ,and in response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power Company dated August 9, 2010, herewith submits the following information: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 1 REQUEST NO.1: Given the Company's close contact with Commercial and Industrial customers in its service terrtory, why did the Company choose to outsource the administration and implementation of the FLEX PEAK MANAGEMENT program? Please explain. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.1: Idaho Power considered whether it would be better to create and implement this program in-house or to work with a third-party aggregator. The Company recognized the benefit of contracting with a third-part aggregator, which would combine the Company's customer relationships and program experience with a third part's commercial and industrial demand-reduction expertise. To penetrate the medium to large commercial industry and to achieve moderate demand savings on an individual customer basis is resource intensive in both personnel and technology. Demand response aggregators have refined their marketing messages and have created audits and processes which maximize individual demand reduction potentiaL. In addition, they are able to utilze experience and internal softare developed over several years to establish a portolio of individual customer participants that maximizes reliability of overall reduction commitments. Idaho Power succeeded in recruiting customers quickly by leveraging the customer representatives' existing relationships with customers along with the aggregatots existing knowledge and infrastructure. Idaho Power believes that working with EnerNOC and its turnkey program allowed the program to begin earlier and with faster ramp-up than if it had been created internally. One of the key factors for Idaho Power was the reliabilty of meeting load reduction targets. If EnerNOC does not meet its contracted demand reduction IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 2 obligation for any given event or any event hour, EnerNOC pays a penalty to Idaho Power, thus enhancing the reliabilty of its commitments. EnerNOC also provides additional benefits to customers beyond receiving an incentive check. EnerNOC provides customers with on-site audits to identify reduction potentiaL. EnerNOC provides expertise to establish a mutually acceptable reduction plan and, when warranted, it provides individual coaching during events to help customers achieve their reduction. EnerNOC customer service representatives are available twenty-four hours a day, 365 days per year to answer customers' questions. In addition, customers have year-round access to near real-time energy monitoring softare, which gives insight into their energy usage patterns and allows the potential to save energy through learning to manage their energy systems. Providing this level of service requires very personalized service, and equipment installation and monitoring behind Idaho Power's meter. After it was determined that an aggregator may have the expertise, knowledge, and access to equipment and softare that the Company did not possess, the Request for Proposal was created with the intent of receiving costs that would allow Idaho Power to conduct a formal benefit/cost analysis. The Company was able to verify that contracting with an aggregator was in fact cost-effective from both a utilty and total resource cost perspective. The Company then reviewed the costs and benefits of using an aggregator and determined that the avoided risk of guaranteed MW reduction, quick program ramp-up, and added benefits to customers of a turnkey program approach was the preferred option. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 3 By hiring EnerNOC to offer this program, Idaho Power maintains good relations with their commercial and industrial customers by providing them with a good, well-run program that they find valuable. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 4 REQUEST NO.2: Please explain the methodology used by your consultant, Nexant, Inc., to determine Net to Gross (NTG) ratio estimates for each program implemented in 2008 and 2009. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.2: As a point of clarification, Nexant, Inc., did not apply net-to-gross ("NTG") ratios to each program Idaho Power implemented in 2008 and 2009; however, Nexant, Inc., did apply NTG ratios at the measure leveL. The consultant identified energy efficiency potential at the measure level as shown in the Demand Side Management Potential Study as filed with the Idaho Public Utilties Commission in the Demand-Side Management 2009 Report, Supplement II, Evaluation. As found in the Demand Side Management, Potential Study, Volume i, on pages 2-2 and 2-3 under the Measure Definition section, Nexants methodology for applying NTG factors is: To take free ridership into account, the formula is multiplied by a net-to-gross ratio that accounts for the share of the savings due to free ridership. Net-to-gross ratio values were derived from the values recommended by the California Public Utilties Commission.1 1 In general, California's net-to-gross ratios tend to be lower than in other parts . of the country-an effect attributable to many years of aggressive program implementation and market conditioning, and an increased level of consumer awareness due to high energy prices (relative to other geographic areas) and historical events such as California's energy crisis in 2001. To the extent that IPC realizes higher net-to-gross ratios, it may also achieve higher net program savings than estimated in this analysis. In addition, the methodology is also discussed in Section 3.2.3 on pages 3-7, which states: IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 5 Each bundle of measures was then screened using the TRC and UC tests as described in Section 2. Net to Gross Ratio values used for the UC test were derived from the values recommended by the California Public Utilties Commission and are shown in Table 3-3. Table 3-3 DEER database Net-to-Gross ratios Program Area/Program Appliance early retirement and replacement Residential Audits Refrigerator Recycling / Freezer Recycling Residential Contractor Program Emerging Technologies All other residential programs Net-to-Gross Ratios 0.80 0.72 0.35/0.54 0.89 0.83 0.80 The methodology by which Nexant applied the NTG factors in the residential and commercial sectors was to discount the Net Present Value ("NPV") of the avoided cost for each measure by the NTG ratio in the numerator of the Utilty Cost Test. In the industrial sector, the achievable potential was determined by various incentive levels and was presented as high, medium, and low cases. NTG factors were not directly applied in the industrial model, since free ridership could vary based on the incentive level(s) and would be assumed to be a factor of incentive structure. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research and Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 6 REQUEST NO.3: Please provide a spreadsheet containing the following information for each customer and each measure incented under the CUSTOM EFFICIENCY and REBATE ADVANTAGE programs for 2008 and 2009 program years: . Customer Name . Contact name . Customer address and phone number . Measure(s) implemented . Energy savings . Demand reduction . Method of energy savings and demand reduction calculation . Incentive amount . Customer investment . Measure Implementation date . Incentive date . Installation verification date RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.3: Idaho Power does not store program data in the exact manner that Staff has requested. The Company has provided as much of the information as possible in electronic form and has provided explanations when data definitions may vary from what Staff has requested. Custom Effciency Included on the enclosed disk is a spreadsheet with a list of the projects for which incentives were paid from the Idaho Energy Efficiency Rider through the Custom Efficiency Program in 2008 and 2009. Contained in the spreadsheet are the following fields: .Project Number.Customer City.Customer State.Customer Zip.Project Description.Measure Type.Energy savings kWhlyr.Demand reduction akW IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 7 . Demand reduction Peak kW . Demand reduction Of-peak kW . Incentive amount . Customer investment . Incentive date The requested fields not included in the spreadsheet are: . Customer Name . Contact name . Customer address and phone number . Method of energy savings and demand reduction calculation . Measure Implementation date . Installation verification date Idaho Power considers specific customer information confidentiaL. Idaho Power maintains a hard copy file for every custom project. These files contain specific customer information, project descriptions, applications, information on methods of determining energy savings, and demand reduction, photographs, and other project specific information. These files are available for Staff to audit at Idaho Powets headquarters upon signing a protective agreement. Please contact Doug Jones at 388- 2615 or Camila Victoria at 388-5821 to arrange an on-site audit. Since each of the projects under Customer Effciency is unique, the method(s) of verifying savings vary from project to project. Energy and demand savings are estimated by a third-party engineering firm or the customer and are reviewed by Idaho Power engineers. For large projects, savings are often verified by end-use metering andlor bil analysis. The measure implementation date, as requested by Staff, may vary from a few days to a month prior to incentive payment and these dates are not electronically stored. The implementation date is always prior to the incentive payment date. The tracking of the installation date varies from project to project. For all large projects, Idaho Power engineers make on-site visits to confirm that the measure(s) were IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 8 implemented as planned. For smaller projects, it is not cost-effective for Idaho Power engineers to visit all sites for verification purposes. Rather, Idaho Power uses a combination of engineer site visits, site visits by other Idaho Power field personnel, and, in some cases, invoices and pictures taken of the installation by the customer. Rebate Advantage Included on the enclosed disk is a spreadsheet with a list of the projects for . which incentives were paid from the Idaho Energy Efficiency Rider through the Rebate Advantage Program in 2008 and 2009. Contained in the spreadsheet are the following fields: . Project Number . Project Description . Measure Type . Energy savings kWhlyr . Incentive amount . Customer investment . Measure Implementation Date . Incentive date The requested fields not included in the spreadsheet are: . Customer Name . Contact name . Customer address and phone number . Method of energy savings and demand reduction calculation . Installation verification date Idaho Power considers specific customer information confidentiaL. The redacted information is available for Staff to audit at Idaho Powets headquarters upon signing a protective agreement. Please contact Doug Jones at 388-2615 or Camila Victoria at 388-5821 to arrange an on-site audit. Because there is only one measure under the Rebate Advantage program that is paying an incentive for energy savings when a customer purchases an ENERGY IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 9 STAR~ manufactured home, the Project Description field contains the name of the manufacturer and the Measure Type field contains the serial number of the home. The installation verification date in this program is recorded as the date when the program manager verifies via Idaho Powets Customer Information System ("CIS+") andlor a customer phone call that either a new account has been set up or the customer verifies that the home is set up under an existing accunt. As shown in Idaho Powets Demand-Side-Management 2009 Report, Supplement 1, Cost-Effectiveness, page 32, the savings are determined by heating and cooling type, heating zone location, and cooling zone location. These savings are deemed by the Regional Technical Forum (ii RTF") and contained in the RTF spreadsheet EStarMHF07v1_1.xls. Idaho Power has continued to follow and participate in regional efforts to develop and market energy effcient manufactured housing with the Northwest Energy Efficient Manufactured Home ("NEEM") program. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 10 REQUEST NO.4: Please explain if incentives have been paid, or wil be paid, to customers who are participating in the AlC COOL CREDIT program but are not able to receive a curtailment signaL. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.4: Idaho Power is not aware of any AlC Cool Credit participants that received an incentive during the 2008-2009 time period who did not receive a curtailment signaL. While it is possible that the signal may not have been received by a device, the instances are rare and the Company is not aware of any specific instances when it may have occurred. Currently, Idaho Power is only installng switches where the Advanced Metering Infrastructure system is available. The program is designed so that a customer does not receive an incentive until a switch has been installed at their residence. After Honeywell, the installation contractor, installs the device, the Company is notified and the customets information is updated in CIS+. Once it has been updated, the customer receives a $7.00 credit on hislher next bil during the cycling season (June-August). Honeywell is committed to randomly perform Quality Assurance ("QA") on five percent of switch installations in the field to assure that a switch has been installed, that the installation was done correctly, and that the serial numbers on the switch were recorded accurately. In 2009, Honeywell conducted QA on about 6.5 percent of the switch installations. Honeywell inspected 615 installations out of a total of 9,479 installs in 2009. Honeywell also provides quality checks by phone on five percent of the installations. In addition, Honeywell reports to Idaho Power on the number of checks of each type that were performed each week in its weekly Production Plan. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 11 In 2007, two mitigation projects occurred, one regarding the radio signal and another regarding an installer whose work did not match what was reported. The incidences are described on page 12 of the Demand-Side Management 2007 Annual Report. In each case, a mitigation plan was quickly enforced and the Company was fully reimbursed for the incentives that were paid out to customers in error. The reimbursement was credited to the Energy Efficiency Rider account. In 2010, the radio paging companies servicing the Pocatello and Twin Falls areas discontinued servicing these areas and, as a result, the program participants are now unable to have their AlC loads curtailed. This situation was described at the May 26, 2010, Energy Effciency Advisory Group meeting. The mitigation plan wil be fully described in the Company's Demand-Side Management 2010 Annual Report. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 12 REQUEST NO.5: Are the Company's customer satisfaction results based on survey offerings to all customers or just those customers who have participated in the Company's DSM programs? Please explain. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO.5: Idaho Power assumes Staff is referring to the "Company's customer satisfaction results. . . ." on pages 13 and 14 of Idaho Powets Demand-Side Management 2009 Annual Report. The results of the Company's quarterly customer relationship survey as described on page 13 are based on a quarterly survey of a representative sample of all of Idaho Powets customers, not just customers who have participated in the Company's Demand-Side Management programs. The response to this Request was prepared by Pete Pengily, Customer Research & Analysis Leader, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Lisa D. Nordstrom, Lead Counsel, Idaho Power Company. DATED at Boise, Idaho, this 2¡th day of August 2010. .k f) 'l~Jo~LISA D. NORDST OM Attorney for Idaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY -13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 2¡th day of August 2010 I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Neil Price Deputy Attomey General Idaho Public Utilties Commission 472 West Washington P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 -. Hand Delivered U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -. Email NeiI.PriceCâpuc.idaho.gov Idaho Conservation League Benjamin J. Otto Idaho Conservation League 710 North Sixth Street P.O. Box 844 Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered -. U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -. Email bottoCâidahoconservation.org Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. Eric L. Olsen RACINE, OLSON, NYE, BUDGE & BAILEY, CHARTERED 201 East Center P.O. Box 1391 Pocatello, Idaho 83204-1391 Hand Delivered -. U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -. Email elocaracinelaw.net Anthony Yankel Yankel & Associates, Inc. 29814 Lake Road Bay Vilage, Ohio 44140 Hand Delivered -. U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -. Email tonycayankel.net Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Peter J. Richardson Gregory M. Adams RICHARDSON & O'LEARY, PLLC 515 North 27th Street P.O. Box 7218 Boise, Idaho 83702 Hand Delivered -. U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -. Email petercarichardsonandoleary.com gregcarichardsonandoleary.com IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY - 14 Dr. Don Reading Ben Johnson Associates, Inc. 6070 Hil Road Boise, Idaho 83703 Hand Delivered -. U.S. Mail _ Overnight Mail FAX -. Email dreadingcamindspring.com ;;Q?lkhLisa D. Nordstro IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION STAFF TO IDAHO POWER COMPANY -15