Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070815IPC to Micron 1-27.pdfBARTON L. KLINE Attorney August 14 , 2007 Jean D. Jewell , Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street P. O. Box 83720 Boise , Idaho 83720-0074 Re:Case No. IPC-07- General Rate Case Filing Dear Ms. Jewell: IDAHO~POWER~ An IDACORP Company RECE'VEl) Lull1 AUG lli P \4: ij 1 . . " ;;::i IC UTi ~ Hr~g)CO~/:M h:i S I ON Please find enclosed an original and two (2) copies of the Response of Idaho Power to the First Production Request of Micron Technology, Inc. in the above-referenced matter. I would appreciate it if you would return a stamped copy of this transmittal letter in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope. BLK:sh Enclosures Very t uly yours O. Box 70 (83707) 1221 W. Idaho St. Boise, ID 83702 BARTON L. KLINE ISB #1526 LISA D. NORDSTROM ISB #5733 Idaho Power Company O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-2682 FAX Telephone: (208) 388-6936 RECEIVED 10til IlLIG III P 4: 1l8 / i l~~/il~ji:);Cjl;:;LICUlIL! llc0 i \;' '1"" ':;:'(", I\'v ,," I\:;ViV/\I Attorney for Idaho Power Company Street Address for Express Mail: 1221 West Idaho Street Boise, Idaho 83702 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO ) CASE NO. IPC-07- RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "the Company ) and , in response to Micron Technology Inc.'s First Set of Discovery Requests to Idaho Power Company dated July 17, 2007, herewith submits the following information: RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.: With respect to page 6, lines 15-22 of Ms. Smith's testimony, provide the most recent 13 months adjusted actual plant in service data available. Please illustrate and explain the difference between the current 13-month average methodology and simple average methodology. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The thirteen month average method is an average of the Electric Plant in Service balance over the last thirteen months. The Simple Average is an average of the first and last month Electric Plant in Service balance for the thirteen month period. The requested explanatory documents are enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 2 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.With respect to Ms. Smith's testimony at page 7, lines 1-, provide the most recent 12 months of actual O&M expense data by business unit and cost element. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The requested information is enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 3 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.With respect to Ms. Smith's testimony at page 7 , line 21-25, provide the approved 2007 forecast O&M data by month , business unit and cost element. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The requested information is enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II, Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 4 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.With respect to Ms. Smith's testimony at page 8 , lines 12-, provide budgeted O&M expense by cost center. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The requested information is enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 5 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.: With respect to Ms. Smith's testimony at page 8, lines 12-, show the actual allocation of O&M expense by cost center to FERC account and provide the 2006 actual O&M charges to those accounts. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The enclosed Excel spreadsheets for the 2006 actual expenses by FERC account and the 2007 forecast by FERC account provide the requested information. For actual allocation by cost center to FERC account please refer to the excel formulas within the individual cells. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 6 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.Provide forecast 2008 O&M budgets by business unit and cost element. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The 2007 forecast was based upon the 2007 budget approved by the Company Board of Directors. The 2008 forecast is derived from the 2007 budget and was escalated for inflation, therefore there is no 2008 O&M budget. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 7 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.With respect to Ms. Smith's testimony at page 9, lines 16-23, provide construction expenditures by project, workpapers for the closings to plant and the actual historical average for closings to plant. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The closings to plant by project type and plant account were obtained for 1998 through 2002 from the Company s Asset Management system. The closings were then totaled by plant account for the five-year period within each project type. The total five- year closing percentage for each plant account was determined by dividing the individual plant account closings for the five-year period by the total project type closings for the five-year period. Estimated closings for 2007 by project types were provided by each of the Business Units and allocated to the individual plant accounts using these allocation percentages. Project types 40 , 42, 43 , 44, 45, 46, 47 , 48, and 49 were allocated using a slightly different methodology. For these project types , a two-year average was used as the basis period instead of the five-year average. The change in methodology was a result of determining that the use of the five-year average distorted the results. The distortion was caused by the 2004 elimination of the inplant accounting methodology that was used for capitalizing meters and transformers. As a result , it was determined that the most recent two-year period was a more representative time period to determine closings to plant for these Project types. Explanatory documents and workpapers are enclosed. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 8 The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith, Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 9 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.: With respect to Ms. Smith's testimony at page 11 , lines 18-, provide the five year historical averages and the data to compute the averages for the average percentage of monthly retirements to monthly additions. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. The five year historical data for additions and retirements of Electric Plant in Service (EPIS) was obtained from the Company s Asset Management system. The additions and retirements recorded to EPIS for the five-year period 1998 through 2002 were totaled by plant account and grouped into categories based on the type of plant. For example, plant accounts 350 through 359 are transmission station and line assets and are grouped as "Transmission Plant"Next, the five-year retirement percentage was calculated by dividing the total five-year retirements by category, by the total five- year additions for each category. This percentage was then applied to the total 2007 estimated monthly additions in order to derive the estimated 2007 retirements by category. Finally, in order to spread the total retirements by category back to the individual plant accounts the percentage of five-year retirements by plant accounts to the total of the five-year retirements by category was derived. These percentages were then applied to the total estimated 2007 retirements by category to derive the forecasted plant account retirement amounts within each category. Actual retirements were determined for plant account 301 , 302 , 303 , 391 , 393 394, 395, 397 , and 398 because assets in these accounts are retired based on vintage year. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 10 The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 11 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.Provide data comparable to Exhibit 16 but using the latest available 12 months data, rather than forecast 2007 forecast data. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. Idaho Power objects to this Production Request on the grounds that it is vague and does not provide the assumptions necessary to respond. Without waiving this objection, the 12 months ended data, June 30 , 2007 actuals , are enclosed. Certain schedules that require computation , that are not done on an interim basis, have not been included. The response to this request was prepared by Lori Smith , Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Finance , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1 0:Provide all data, workpapers and spreadsheets used to develop 2007 forecast sales revenues shown at Exhibit 2 , page 2 line 2. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10: The 2007 test year sales revenue amount of $797 776 922 listed on Exhibit 20 page 2 , line 2 is comprised of four revenue categories: Retail Sales, Adjustments to Sales Revenues/Refunds , Firm Sales for Resale , and System Opportunity Sales. The 2007 test year revenue associated with each of the revenue categories is detailed on Exhibit 24 , page 1 , lines 3- The Retail Sales amount of $646,474 074 listed on Exhibit 24, page 1 , line 3 is derived by applying current rates to the test year billing units for each customer class. The billing units used in this process are contained in two Excel spreadsheets included with this response.The New Usages tab the Excel file titled BiliingUnits RetaiIRates" contains the billing units used to derive the test year revenue for all retail customers excluding Special Contract customers. The billing units used to derive the test year revenue for the Special Contract customers are contained in the Excel file titled "BiliingUnits SpeciaIContractsandWholesaleCust."The revenue calculations for each Idaho retail customer class are detailed on Exhibit 59, pages 2-23. The revenue category "Adjustments to Sales Revenues/Refunds" is explained by Mr. Said in his testimony, pages 30 and 31. The calculation of the amount $370 387 listed on Exhibit 24 , page 1 , line 4 is detailed on Exhibit 39. The calculation of the Firm Sales for Resale amount of $1 622 084 included on Exhibit 24 , page 1 , line 5 is detailed in the attached Excel file titled "RRC-PNF". The derivation of the System Opportunity RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 13 Sales amount of $149,310,377 found on Exhibit 24, page 1 , line 5 is equal to the sum of the revenue subcategories Transmission Losses and Surplus Sales Revenue Excluding Transmission Costs. In this context , the revenue subcategory Transmission Losses represents revenues received for the provision of energy to serve third-party transmission line losses , which is described in more detail in Ms. Smith's testimony, pages 13 and 14. Transmission Losses for 2007 in the amount of $6 426 777 can be found on page 53 of Ms. Schwendiman s workpapers and 2007 Surplus Sales Revenue Excluding Transmission Costs in the amount of $142 883 600 can be found on page 63 of Ms. Schwendiman s workpapers. The response to this request was prepared by Celeste Schwendiman , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 14 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. With respect to the testimony of Ms. Schwendiman, page 9, lines 14-, provide all data, workpapers, spreadsheet and any other information used to develop the $370 387 revenue credit for 2007 investment. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11: As stated in Ms. Schwendiman s testimony on page 9, line 19, the revenue credit was provided by Mr. Said. Mr. Said provided the development of this number in Exhibit No. 39 and describes that exhibit on page 30, lines 11 through 25 of his testimony. The response to this request was prepared by Greg Said, Manager of Revenue Requirement and Celeste Schwendiman , Senior Pricing Analyst, Pricing and Regulatory Services Department, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 15 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12 Provide data comparable to Exhibit 24 but for the most recent 12 months actual , rather than 2007 forecast. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12: Idaho Power objects to this Production Request on the grounds it is vague and does not provide the assumptions necessary to calculate the requested adjustment columns in the referenced exhibit. Without waiving this objection , Idaho Power has enclosed a workpaper showing the necessary change from the specified starting point (mid-year actuals) to the Company s filed test year. The response to this request was prepared by Celeste Schwendiman, Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 16 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13 Provide data comparable to Exhibit 25 but using unadjusted data for the most recent 12 months actual, rather than 2007 forecast. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13: Idaho Power objects to this Production Request on the grounds that it is vague and does not provide the assumptions necessary to calculate the requested adjustment columns in the referenced exhibit. Without waiving this objection , Idaho Power has enclosed a workpaper showing necessary change from the specified starting point (mid- year actuals) to the Company s filed test year. The response to this request was prepared by Celeste Schwendiman, Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 17 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14 Ms. Smith's testimony at page 3 , lines 11-, indicates that Ms. Schwendiman "addresses the normalizing adjustments to sales and revenues . Provide all data workpapers, documents , spreadsheets and any other information used by Ms. Schwendiman to develop the normalizing adjustments to sales and revenues. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: At pages 3-15 of his direct testimony, Mr. Said states that for the 2007 test year the analyses includes water conditions corresponding to years 1928 through 2006. The average of the variable power supply expenses related to each of the 79 water conditions represents the normalization of variable power supply expenses. Details for the net power supply cost normalization can be found in Mr. Said's Exhibit Nos. 32- and 36, and in Mr. Said's work papers. The adjustment to the Company s system opportunity sales revenue of negative $106 112 573 reflects the decreased level of opportunity sales associated with the multiple historical water conditions provided. Test year sales revenues were developed as described in the Response to Request No.1 O. The adjustments as applied to the jurisdictional separation study are detailed in Ms. Schwendiman s work papers , pg. 56-, and 148-161. The response to this request was prepared by Celeste Schwendiman , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 18 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15 Provide the most recent marginal cost study prepared by the Company. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: Company s most recent analysis of the generation and transmission marginal costs is included in Mr. Tatum s workpapers , pages 48-55. Idaho Power has not recently prepared a full marginal cost study that includes distribution marginal costs along with generation and transmission marginal costs. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 19 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: Provide in electronic format the actual Excel workbooks used to prepare the cost of service studies, including all the input data and formulas. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: The requested information was provided with the Company s Response Requests No.6 and No.7 of the Industrial Customer s Third Request for Production. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum, Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 20 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17 Provide detailed workpapers for the workshop methodology" for converting billing period data to calendar month data used in the current rate proceeding, including all input data, formulas and calculations. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17: The factors for converting billing period data into calendar month data used in this rate case proceeding are contained in the file titled CalendarMonthFactors20042006.xls which is enclosed with this response. Three years of factors were determined using the workshop methodology, and then the median factors were used for the forecast 2007 test year. Customers are billed throughout each month, and billing periods (cycles) typically include portions of more than one calendar month. Prior to adopting the workshop methodology, billing period data was converted into calendar month data using a simple linear interpolation. Daily consumption during the billing period was assumed to be flat and weather effects were ignored. As part of the current rate case proceeding, the billing month data have been converted into calendar month data using the nonlinear method based on load research data that utilizes actual daily usage patterns. Daily consumption is assumed to fluctuate in proportion to the fluctuations in the daily consumption of the load research sample customers. This methodology captures the effects of weather on energy consumption and improves the process of determining coincident peak demand responsibility. The daily consumption data for the average customer in each load research sample for 2004 through 2006 are contained in the DailykWh20042006.xls workbook which is enclosed. The meter reading schedules for those years are also included. Not RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 21 all meters were read on the scheduled read dates, however. Every month, for example some customers turned off and others turned on. The actual computations to arrive at the factors for converting billing period data to calendar month data in this case were performed on a bill-by-bill basis using actual read dates within a SAS program. The input included hundreds of thousands of bills for each month , and therefore, is too voluminous to provide with this response. However on request, the additional information and material used under the workshop methodology will be made available for review at the Company s headquarters located at 1221 West Idaho Street, Boise , Idaho 83702. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 22 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18 Provide detailed workpapers for the surrogate demand normalization methodology" used in the current proceeding for determining class coincident peak demands, including all input data, formulas, and calculations. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18: The surrogate demand normalization methodology agreed to by the parties as part of the cost-of-service workshop process (Case No. IPC-04-23) uses the five-year median demand ratios applied to the normalized monthly energy values for each customer class to determine the coincident peak demands by class. This methodology eliminates the effect of any atypical demand ratios that might exist in a given year due to unusual weather conditions. The detailed workpapers that support this process are included with this response. The input data, formulas , and calculations are contained in the Excel workbook Demands07RCMedianFactors.xls. The five years of demand ratios are contained in MedianDemandFactors20022006.xls. Additional documentation of the formulas and methodology are provided in LoReMethod2007.doc. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 23 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: Provide all cost of service studies prepared by the Company for rate proceedings since 2000. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: The Company has prepared three cost-of-service studies since 2000. The study prepared for Case No. IPC-07-08 using 2007 test year data was provided with the Company s Response to Requests No.6 and No.7 of the Industrial Customer s Third Request for Production. The cost-of-service study prepared for Case No. IPC-E- 03- using 2003 test year data and the study prepared for Case No. IPC-E- 05-28 using 2005 test year data in Excel format are enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 24 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20 Provide the Company s complete 2006 Integrated Resource Plan. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20: The 2006 Integrated Resource Plan is provided on the enclosed CD. A hard copy can be made available upon request. The response to this request was prepared by Greg Said, Manager of Revenue Requirement, Pricing and Regulatory Services Department , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 25 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. Provide the updated marginal energy costs for the five year period 2007-2011 referred to in the testimony of Mr. Tatum at page 29 , lines 5- RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21 : The marginal energy costs for the five year period 2007-2011 are included in Mr. Tatum s workpapers, page 51. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum, Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline , Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 26 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22:Provide monthly load factors and production for each of the Company s hydro and thermal generating resources including the three combustion turbines referenced in Mr. Tatum s testimony at page 39, lines 1-, for the last five years. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22: The Company does not calculate load factors for its generation resources. However, enclosed with this response is an Excel file containing the monthly energy output in megawatt-hours and the maximum generating capability for each of the Company s generation resources for the years 2002 - 2006. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum, Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline , Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 27 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23 Provide all monthly energy and peak hour surplus/deficiency data in numeric format for the years 2007-2011 from the 2006 IRP used to seasonalize marginal generation capacity costs and as discussed in Mr. Tatum s testimony at page 27, lines 13-25. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23: The monthly energy and peak hour surplus/deficiency data in numeric format for the years 2007-2011 from the 2006 IRP used to seasonalize marginal generation capacity costs are included in Mr. Tatum s workpapers , page 57. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum , Senior Pricing Analyst, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 28 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24 Provide monthly system retail sales and coincident peak loads for the last 10 years. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24: The monthly system retail sales for the last 10 years are included with this response in electronic format on the enclosed CD. The coincident peak loads for the last 10 years are enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Timothy Tatum, Senior Pricing Analyst , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 29 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 25 Provide all LOLP or other capacity risk or load loss studies performed by or for the Company during the last 3 years. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 25: The Company has not performed any LOLP studies during the last 3 years. The response to this request was prepared by Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 30 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 26 Provide a copy of any draft Integrated Resource Plan for the Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 26: The requested information is enclosed. The response to this request was prepared by Greg Said , Manager of Revenue Requirement , Pricing and Regulatory Services Department, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline , Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney Idaho Power Company. RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 31 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 27:Provide copies of all materials previously submitted to the Commission Staff or other parties in connection with this rate case. You need not include discovery responses or other material already served on Micron s representatives. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 27: On July 31 2007, Idaho Power filed an objection to this request. Subsequently, counsel for Idaho Power and for Micron discussed the information Micron was seeking and Idaho Power was able to confirm that Micron had previously received most of the information it had requested and would receive the balance of the requested information upon execution of the Protective Agreement in place for this proceeding. The response to this request was prepared by Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney and/or Lisa D. Nordstrom, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company. :tk DATED at Boise , Idaho, this /q. day of August, 2007. (2; BARTON L. KLINE Attorney for Idaho Power Company LISA D. NORDSTROM Attorney for Idaho Power Company RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 32 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE t'A I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of August, 2007, I served a true and correct copy of the within and foregoing document upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Weldon Stutzman Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 W. Washington (83702) O. Box 83720 Boise , Idaho 83720-0074 Donovan Walker Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 W. Washington (83702) O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Peter J. Richardson , Esq. Richardson & O'Leary 515 N. 2ih Street O. Box 7218 Boise, Idaho 83702 Don Reading Ben Johnson Associates 6070 Hill Road Boise, Idaho 83702 Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. Eric L. Olsen Racine, Olson , Nye, Budge & Bailey O. Box 1391 201 E. Center Pocatello, Idaho 83204 ----2LHand Delivered- U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX ---.X Email Weldon.stutzman~puc.idaho.qov ----2LHand Delivered - U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX ---.X Email Donovan.walker~puc.idaho.qov Hand Delivered ---.2LU.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX1. Email peter~ richardsonandolearv.com Hand Delivered ---.2LU.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX1. Email dreadinq~mindsprinq.com Hand Delivered ---.2LU.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email elo~ racinelaw.net RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 33 Anthony Yankel 29814 Lake Road Bay Village, OH 444140 Kroger Co. Fred Meyer and Smiths Michael L. Ku rtz Kurt J. Boehm Boehm , Kurtz & Lowry 36 East Seventh Street, Suite 1510 Cincinnati , Ohio 45202 The Kroger Co. Attn: Corporate Energy Manager (G09) 1014 Vine Street Cincinnati , Ohio 45202 Micron Technology Conley Ward Michael C. Creamer Givens Pursley 601 W. Bannock Street O. Box 2720 Boise, Idaho 83701 Dennis E. Peseau , Ph.D. Utility Resources , Inc. 1500 Liberty Street SE, Suite 250 Salem , OR 97302 Department of Energy Lot Cooke Arthur Perry Bruder Office of the Attorney General United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington , DC 20585 Routing Symbol GC- 76 Hand Delivered~U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email tonv(Q)vankel.net Hand Delivered~U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email mkurtz(Q)bkllawfirm.com kboehm (Q) bkllawfirm.com Hand Delivered~U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email Hand Delivered~U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email cew(Q)qivenspursleV.com mcc(Q) qivenspursleV.com Hand Delivered ~ U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email dpeseau (Q) excite. com Hand Delivered - U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX ---.X Email lot.cooke(Q) hq.doe.qov arthur.bruder(Q) hq.doe.qov RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 34 Dennis Goins Potomac Management Group 5801 Westchester Street O. Box 30225 Alexandria, VA 22310-8225 Hand Delivered ---2LU.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX ----X Email DGoinsPMG~cox.net Dale Swan Ammar Ansari Exeter Associates 5565 Sterrett Place , Suite 310 Columbia, MD 20904 Hand Delivered --2L U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX Email dswan ~ exeterassociates.com aansari ~ exeterassociates.com ~kj~ Barton L. Kline RESPONSE OF IDAHO POWER TO THE FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., Page 35