HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060913IPC to ICIP 31-45.pdfIDAHO POWER ~E \ V ED
O. BOX 70
-'--'
---~- BOISE ld 4: 56An IDACORP Company UUD
Monica B. Moen
Attorney II
\0 t~ 4 () I-'U GL.i(~
UTIUfISS- cmM~\iSSI0N
September 12, 2006
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
P. O. Box 83720
Boise , Idaho 83720-0074
Re:Case No. IPC-06-
Idaho Power Company s Response to the Third Production Request
of the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Please find enclosed for filing an original and two (2) copies of Idaho Power
Company s Response to the Third Production Request of the Industrial Customers of Idaho
Power regarding the above-referenced matter.
I would appreciate it if you would return a stamped copy of this transmittal letter
to me in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope.
Very truly yours
Monica B. Moen
MBM:sh
Enclosures
Telephone (208) 388-2692 Fax (208) 388-6936, E-mail MMoenfWidahopower.com
BARTON L. KLINE ISB #1526
MONICA B. MOEN ISB #5734
Idaho Power Company
O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
Telephone: (208) 388-2682
FAX Telephone: (208) 388-6936
RECEIVED
200n SEP \ 2 PM 4:
IDtHO \;'UdL..IC
UTILlT\ES COiAM\SSION
Attorney for Idaho Power Company
Street Address for Express Mail
1221 West Idaho Street
Boise , Idaho 83702
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
AND NECESSITY FOR THE RATE BASING
OF THE EV ANDER ANDREWS POWERPLANT.
CASE NO. IPC-06-
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'
RESPONSE TO THE THIRD
PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE
INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF
IDAHO POWER
COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "the Company
and, in response to the Third Production Request of the Industrial Customers of Idaho
Power to Idaho Power Company dated August 15 , 2006, herewith submits the following
information.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 31: In response to ICIP's Production
Request No., Idaho Power stated
Given the competitiveness of the pricing in the Bennett
Mountain RFP, Idaho Power was able to acquire the
incremental 85 MW of capacity (173 MW-88 MW = 85 MW) at
an extremely competitive price providing additional
generation at minimal cost while improving reliability for
customers.
Please explain how the "additional generation" acquired , above the 88 MW
called for in the 2004 IRP , will change IPC's projected need for future resources as set
forth in the 2004 IRP? For example, will the additional generation acquired obviate the
need for any specific RFPs that were called for in the 2004 IRP?
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 31: The additional peaking capacity
acquired above the 88 MW called for in the 2004 IRP will allow Idaho Power to defer the
timing of future resources required to serve peak-hour loads. Although Idaho Power
does not typically assign or correlate changes in its resource plan to specific changes in
inputs such as load forecast, PURPA generation forecast, Snake River base flows , or
resource additions (or losses), the summation of these types of changes are considered
in total in the 2006 IRP.
The summation of changes considered in the 2006 IRP, including the 85
MW of additional peaking capacity provided by the larger Evander Andrews combustion
turbine , have allowed several of the resources selected in the 2004 IRP to be deferred.
First, the 100 MW geothermal resource originally planned to be online in 2008 in the
2004 IRP has been reduced to 50 MW and the online date deferred until 2009. Second
the 62 MW combustion turbine/distributed generation/market purchase resource
originally planned to be online in 2010 in the 2004 IRP has been eliminated altogether
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 2
although market purchases are still anticipated in the 2006 IRP. Finally, the 12 MW of
CHP resources originally planned to be online in 2007 in the 2004 IRP have been
deferred until 2010.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 3
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 32: In response to ICIP Production
Request No., Idaho Power stated that ". . . by incorporating a range of sizes in the
RFP and ultimately selecting a 173 MW combustion turbine , Idaho Power has an
opportunity to defer additional generation resources in future resource plans. .." Please
provide a copy of all resource plans in which Idaho Power has deferred, or would defer
additional generation due to the proposed Evander Andrews plant's having more
generation capabilities than the 88 MW called for in the 2004 IRP. Also, please provide
a description of how the additional generation (above the 88 MW) called for in the 2004
IRP) will affect Idaho Power s projected resource needs in the future. If possible, please
describe the types of resources that will be deferred due to the additional generation.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 32: The IRP Advisory Council (IRPAC)
Draft of Idaho Power's 2006 IRP is attached hereto as "Response to Request No. 32.
Please refer to the Company s Response to Request No. 31 for a description of how the
additional capacity (above 88 MW) of the Evander Andrews project, along with the other
changes incorporated in the 2006 IRP , have affected Idaho Power s future resource
needs.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 4
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 33: In response to ICIP Production
Request No. 18 , Idaho Power stated that , if the Commission denied Idaho Power s request
for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for the Evander Andrews plant, one
option it would most likely pursue would be "utilizing diesel or temporary gensets." Please
describe what diesel or temporary gensets IPC could use, and provide copies of any
studies or documentation regarding the costs of those resources.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 33: One type of diesel generating set
that Idaho Power could use is a reciprocating engine genset similar to the Caterpillar
mobile gensets used during the energy crisis of 2001. Another possible alternative is
using transportable combustion turbine-based gensets similar to Pratt & Whitney
Swiftpac 25T (25 MW), Swiftpac 50 (50 MW) or its Mobilepac (25 MW). Caterpillar also
offers the XQ5200 Mobile Turbine , a 5.2 MW combustion turbine genset on a rental
basis. Idaho Power has no recent cost studies on these generation alternatives.
Information on these resource alternatives is available on Pratt & Whitney s and
Caterpillar s websites.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 5
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 34: Please describe any cap that
Idaho Power has placed on its spending for Demand Side Management programs.
there are any caps placed on Demand Site Management programs , please explain how
the Company determines such cap if the program has proven to be cost-effective (having
a savings in energy costs that is greater than the cost of the program).
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 34: Idaho Power has no spending caps
on Demand Side Management programs. The primary source of funding for Demand
Side Management programs is provided pursuant to Schedule 91 , Energy Efficiency
Rider (Rider) approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission and the Oregon Public
Utility Commission. The budgeted funding levels for each program are based upon
anticipated expenditures associated with achieving the energy savings and demand
reduction levels identified in the 2004 Integrated Resource Plan and administered with
guidance from the Energy Efficiency Advisory Group.
The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) also provides funds for some
of Idaho Power s Demand Side Management programs. Funding levels for these
programs are established by the BPA. Through its base rates, Idaho Power provides
internal funding for the Weatherization for Qualified Customers Program (WAQC
formerly known as Low Income Weatherization Assistance , or LlWA, and other
expenses that are not provided for within the Rider. Idaho Power s WAQC funding
requirements are based upon historically determined levels and state agency budgeting
needs.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 6
The response to this request was prepared by Theresa Drake, Manager
Customer Relations and Research , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Monica
Moen, Attorney Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 7
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 35: Please provide copies of all
budgets and supporting work papers for Idaho Power s DSM programs over the past five
years.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 35: Attached hereto as "Response to
Request No. 35" is information related to budget estimates as presented to the Energy
Efficiency Advisory Group (EEAG). The various formats of presentations have evolved
throughout the past few years based on suggestions made by EEAG members.
The response to this request was prepared by Theresa Drake , Manager
Customer Relations and Research , in consultation with Monica Moen , Attorney Idaho
Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 8
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 36: Please provide any analyses
conducted by Idaho Power into how the transmission that will be required to bring the
Evander Andrews output to load will affect the Company s loads and resources.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 36: The transmission required to bring
the Evander Andrews output to load will have no effect on the Company s loads and
resources.
The response to this request was prepared by Roger Grim , System
Planning Engineer, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Monica Moen , Attorney
Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
Page 9
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 37: In Idaho Power s Response to
Staff's Request No. 81 , Idaho Power provided a copy of the Company s 2003 evaluation
manual for the peaking resource RFP. Page 29 of that document sets forth a "Cogen and
Small Power Forecast (aMW)." Please provide a copy of the Company s current "Cogen
and Small Power Forecast (aMW)." If one is not available, please fully explain why, and
how the Company s decisions with regard to the 2005 RFP took into account the
generation the Company would receive from Cogen and Small Power Producers.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 37: Please refer to the document
attached hereto as "Response to Request for Production No. 37.
The response to this request was prepared by Randy C. Allphin, CSPP
Contract Administrator, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Monica Moen
Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page 1 0
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 38: With regard to the "Cogen and
Small Power Forecast (aMW)" referred to above in Request for Production No. 40 (sic 37),
please explain fully why the document shows no increase in Cogen and Small Power
generation after 2004. Additionally, please explain whether the Company forecasts any
increase in Cogen and Small Power generation after 2006 and beyond.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 38: The Cogen and Small Power
Production (CSPP) forecast is revised , at a minimum, annually. Because Idaho Power
has no control over the development and operation of CSPP projects, forecasting of the
actual energy output and monthly shape of the energy delivery from these facilities is
very difficult. In fact, in the case new CSPP resources under contract with Idaho Power
but not yet constructed , the actual online dates of these projects tend to vary
tremendously from their estimated online dates which makes it virtually impossible to
depend on any generation from these projects until such time as they have actually
come online and established some monthly generation history. As a result, the
Company only includes the estimated output from projects with signed and IPUC-
approved agreements in the CSPP forecast at the time the forecast is prepared.
Idaho Power currently has over 200 MW of nameplate rating of new CSPP
projects under contract that have not yet been constructed. The majority of these
projects are wind projects. Thus, after applying an optimistic capacity factor of 30% to
this 200 MW of nameplate rating, the amount of generation anticipated from these
resources is approximately 60 MW on an annual average basis.
The majority of these projects estimate online dates in late 2007. Thus, in
the current forecast provided in response to Request No. 37, the additional generation
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
is forecasted to appear in calendar year 2008. However, it is important to note that
since Idaho Power has no control over the construction or operation of these or any
additional PURPA projects , this forecast will most likely change numerous times prior to
these projects coming online and after actual operation history has been established for
these projects.
The response to this request was prepared by Randy C. Allphin , CSPP
Contract Administrator, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Monica Moen
Attorney Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 39: With regard to the "Cogen and
Small Power Forecast (aMW)" referred to above in Request for Production No. 40 (sic 37),
please explain why the 2005 RFP evaluation manual did not contain a similar chart or
forecast.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 39: Please refer to the Company
Response to Request No. 81 propounded by the IPUC Staff in this matter.
The response to this request was prepared by F. Gregory Hall , Principal
Engineer, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Monica Moen, Attorney II , Idaho
Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 40: In response to ICIP Request for
Production No. 18, Idaho Power describes five alternatives for meeting peak demand that
it would consider if the Commission denies its request for a certificate of public
convenience and necessity for the Evander Andrews plant. Please describe what efforts
the Company has made to determine the costs of those alternatives and any estimates the
Company has developed of the costs for implementing these alternatives instead of
constructing the Evander Andrews plant.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 40: The Company has not performed a
detailed analysis of the costs associated with the five alternatives described in ICIP
Request for Production No. 18. Preliminary estimates are available for a couple of the
alternatives.
Alternative 1 - Additional firm east side purchases. Idaho Power has
priced , but has not executed , any additional firm east side purchases for heavy load
hours in July 2007. On September 5 2006 , the Mid-C to Four Corners price spread for
firm heavy load energy was $16 to $17/MWh. The higher Four Corners price is
representative of the premium Idaho Power may have to pay for an east side purchase.
In addition to the premium relative to Mid-C pricing, the cost to purchase energy
on Idaho Power s east side may require an additional expenditure of $5 - $7 to
compensate for the cost of transmission between Four Corners and Idaho Power s east
side interconnections.
Alternative 2 - Increase transmission system import capacity. Several
alternatives to increase import capacity were investigated in the 2006 IRP. Pages 57
through 62 of the Draft 2006 IRP (IRPAC Draft) discuss these transmission projects.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
Preliminary cost estimates (prepared by Power Engineers) range from $10.8 million to
reconductor the Lolo to Oxbow line to $282 million for the Bridger to Midpoint 500 kV
upgrade.
These upgrades were not originally envisioned as alternatives to replace
the new Evander Andrews combustion turbine. However, if the certificate of public
convenience and necessity for the Evander Andrews plant is denied, the projects
identified in the 2006 IRP are the type of longer-term transmission upgrades that Idaho
Power would consider to increase import capability. Idaho Power has submitted long-
term firm transmission requests to NorthWestern Energy, BPA , Avista, PacifiCorp and
Idaho Power. These requests establish a position in the transmission providers' queue
and initiate the process of determining system impacts and preparation of more detailed
cost estimates. However, with the exception of the Lolo to Oxbow reconductoring
project , Idaho Power does not consider these transmission upgrades a near-term
alternative due to construction lead-time.
Alternative 3 - Expand irrigation peak rewards program. Idaho Power is
currently planning changes to the Irrigation Peak Rewards Program. The Company
anticipates filing those proposed changes with the I PUC later this month. The proposed
program modifications are expected to result in an additional 4.5 MW (including losses)
of cost-effective load reduction during the Company s summer peak. A revised
Demand Credit structure and a reduced horsepower limit are the modifications largely
expected to drive the additional load reduction. Under the revised Demand Credit
structure , it is expected that approximately 13% of the customers currently
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
participating with a one day Interruption Option will shift to a two or three day
Interruption Option.
The revised Demand Credit structure and the reduced horsepower limit
are also expected to improve customer satisfaction among program participants. In the
Company s survey of 2005 program participants , the most frequently recommended
improvement to the program was an increase to the Demand Credits. Improvements in
customer satisfaction is also anticipated among those customers with cumulative
horsepower between 75 and 99 that have wanted to participate in the program in past
years , but were not eligible.
In addition , the Company is considering a shift in the interruption period
from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The Company is currently
surveying participants concerning their preferences with respect to timing of daily
interruption periods. Changing the interruption period may increase program participant
satisfaction and possibly increase program participation. It is anticipated that these
changes will increase spending on this program by approximately $300 000 per year.
Alternative 4 - Advertising messages. No efforts to determine costs.
Alternative 5 - Add temporary gensets. No efforts to determine costs.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen , Attorney Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 41: Please explain what assumptions
the Company is making for the future regarding the Conservation Reserve Enhancement
Program (CREP program), through which farmlands will be set aside , and irrigation pumps
turned off. Specifically, please describe any assumptions the Company is making
regarding decreased peak power requirements as compared to what they would be
without the CREP program. Please explain whether these assumptions affected the
Company s decisions with regard to the 2005 RFP or (the) Evander Andrews power plant.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 41: For planning purposes, Idaho Power
has not incorporated any specific assumptions in the 2006 IRP regarding the
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP). On January 9 , 2006 , Idaho
Power announced that it selected a Siemens Power Generation , Inc. proposal to build a
170-megawatt combustion turbine at the utility s Evander Andrews Power Complex
north of Mountain Home, Idaho. CREP was announced four months later in May of
2006. The CREP announcement had no effect on the Company s decision regarding
the 2005 RFP or the Evander Andrews plant.
In a more recent forecast, Idaho Power has incorporated an annual
energy reduction over the next 15 years (2007 through 2021) of approximately 4%
because of CREP.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 42: Please explain why the 2005 RFP
did not include a power purchase option.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 42: Idaho Power needs an additional
peaking resource internal to its system. If a third party developer builds
a generation resource specifically to serve Idaho Power s peaking needs, the developer
will likely attempt to recover most , if not all , of the resource s fixed costs and all of the
resource s variable costs of operation via the power purchase agreement (PPA), plus a
profit. In addition, Idaho Power would likely incur financial costs associated with the
debt imputed by rating agencies because of the power purchase agreement. Based on
Idaho Power s experience and judgment , in this instance, a PPA is not as cost effective
as simply owning the resource. Furthermore , since Idaho Power already has an
established combustion turbine facility and experienced personnel , operations and
maintenance efficiencies and economies are possible.
Another reason a power purchase alternative was not included in the 2005
RFP is the potential restrictions on operational flexibility. A power purchase agreement
might impose limitations on Idaho Power s ability to operate the resource whenever
necessary to meet system needs. With a utility owned resource, Idaho Power has
greater control over these issues.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen , Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 43: Please provide any long-term
transmission planning documents the Company has developed that support any claim by
the Company that it was planning on building any of the transmission facilities that will be
required to bring the proposed Evander Andrews plant output to load regardless of
whether the Evander Andrews plant was built.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 43: Idaho Power has made no claim that
it was planning on building any of the transmission facilities that will be required to bring
the proposed Evander Andrews plant output to load regardless of whether the Evander
Andrews plant was built. The transmission facilities are required as a result of the
proposal to construct an additional peaking resource at the Evander Andrews Power
Complex. Without that proposed new facility, the associated transmission facilities to
accommodate that project would not be constructed. As a result , Idaho Power has no
documents supporting that claim.
The response to this request was prepared by Roger Grim , System
Planning Engineer, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Monica Moen, Attorney
Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 44: Please clarify whether Idaho
Power has a signed contract to receive the natural gas necessary to run the proposed
Evander Andrews plant. If , please provide a copy of the contract, and any other
documentation or description required to determine the terms of the contract, including
duration and price. If not, please describe what arrangements will be necessary to secure
the required natural gas.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 44: Idaho Power has credit and
contractual enabling agreements in place which provide the Company the flexibility to
purchase either physical gas or a financial product to lock in a fixed price for future
periods. The Company also has physical transport and storage capabilities which allow
Idaho Power to purchase gas on a daily basis at Sumas for delivery to the Evander
Andrews power plant.
When the decision to hedge and run Evander Andrews is made , Idaho
Power will evaluate all economic alternatives and pursue the most cost-effective
strategy. Historically, seasonal purchases of gas have been obtained through the
solicitation of several gas providers through a written RFP process while daily gas
purchases have been obtained at the Sumas daily index price through an ongoing
arrangement with a third party.
The response to this request was prepared by Dave Churchman
Manager, Power Supply Operations , Idaho Power Company, in consultation with
Monica Moen , Attorney Idaho Power Company.
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45: Please provide any documents or
research that Idaho Power has which evaluates or relates to the potential for industrial
combined heat and power projects in the Treasure Valley.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 45: Idaho Power has had informal
discussions with at least one customer and formal discussions with two customers.
Idaho Power considers these discussions and any associated documents confidential
customer information.
The response to this request was prepared by Karl E. Bokenkamp,
General Manager Power Supply Operations and Planning, Idaho Power Company, in
consultation with Monica Moen, Attorney II , Idaho Power Company.
DATED at Boise , Idaho, this 1ih day of September 2006.
(fi.
MONICA B. MOEN
Attorney for Idaho Power Company
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER Page
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 1th day of September 2006 , I served a true and correct
copy of the within and foregoing IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO THE
THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER
upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the
following:
Commission Staff -1L Hand Delivered
Donovan Walker US. Mail
Deputy Attorney General Overnight Mail
Idaho Public Utilities Commission FAX
472 W. Washington (83702)--.2L Email Donovan. walker(g)puc.idaho.gov
O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Hand Delivered
Peter 1. Richardson, Esq.US. Mail
Richardson & O'Leary Overnight Mail
515 N.
th Street FAX
O. Box 7218 Email peter(g)richardsonandolearv.com
Boise, Idaho 83702
Don Reading Hand Delivered
Ben Johnson Associates -1L US. Mail
6070 Hill Road Overnight Mail
Boise, Idaho 83702 FAX
Email dreading(g)mindst,:ning.com
Monica B. Moen
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE , Page
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. IPC-O6-
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS
RESPONSE TO
REQUEST NO. 32
CASE NO. IPC-O6-
IDAHO POWER CO.
RESPONSE TO ICIP'
PRODUCTION REQUEST
NO. 32 IS A DRAFT COpy
OF ITS 2006 IRP , WHICH
WAS NOT SCANNED
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. IPC-O6-
THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS
RESPONSE TO
REQUEST NO. 35
Idaho Power Company
2006 DSM Expenditure Budget
Idaho and Oregon Territories
Preliminary
2006
ktucilQUd et '
, ,:.."".,.,.""..
Residential
Energy House Calls.................................................................
: $
Rebate Advantage...................................................................
ENERGY STAR Homes...... ............... ........... ............. ..............
AC Cool Credit (KW) 1............................................................ :
Weatherization Assistance..... .......
.............. ............................ :
Oregon Res. Weatherization 78..............................................
Irrigation
Efficiency Rewards.......... .................. .......... ............ .......
......... :
Efficiency Rewards Ag Rep Labor.......................................
Peak Rewards (kW)................................................................ :
Commercial & Industrial
Building Efficiency....................................................................
School Efficiency.....................................................................
Industrial Efficiency..................................................................
Oregon Audit Schedule 82.......................................................
Other Budget Items
NEEA (Idaho) ..........................................................................
NEEA (Oregon) ........ ..... ........... ..... ................. .........
"""'" .......
EEAG Meetings...................................................................... :
Small Project/Education Funds ...............................................
DSM Analysis & Accounting ................................................... :
Residential Education Initiative ...............................................
Commercial Education Initiative ............................................. :
Commercial Retrofit ................................................................
Residential Retrofit ................................................................. :
Distribution Efficiency Initiative ............................................... :
Other Conservation & Renewable Discounts (C&RD ) ...........
Solar for Schools..................................................................... :
Total Budget
......................................................................: $
2/2/06 EEAG2006BudgetandGoais dfs
322,891
344
868,130
589,558
1 ,358,493
000
638,648
204,600
393,850
540,661
22,002
728,315
000
976,200
48,892
2,400
25,000
655,852
114 783
35,001
260 921
210,752
20,000
739
40,000
175,032
DS
M
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
P
e
t
...
r
m
a
n
c
e
Re
p
o
r
t
Fo
r
t
h
e
P
e
r
i
o
d
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
t
o
A
p
r
i
l
,
2
0
0
6
(3
3
%
of
y
e
a
r
)
YT
D
Ac
t
u
a
l
~:
7
'
~h
.
;
'
n
~;
'
,Bu
d
g
e
t
;:
~
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
(
N
e
w
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
11
,
30
~=
f
~
~i
~
~:
i
~
:
"
i!
~
1
i
t
;~
J
J
'
~!!
;
;
\
~~
i
f
'
i
1
'
i
i
y.~
i
;~
~
:
;
~
~
:~
~
/
o
f/
:
1
~~
P
-
'
~~
t
~
2~
/
Ai
d
e
r
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
R
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
(E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
0
$
5
,
44
2
'
$2
6
0
92
1
Ai
d
e
r
Or
e
g
o
n
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
A
u
d
i
t
,
S
c
h
.
82
0
6
$0
$6
,
O
O
Q
0
%
Al
d
e
r
Or
e
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
10
'
$7
,
84
6
$
2
2
,
00
2
36
%
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
T
o
t
a
l
1
2
0
,
57
3
8
2
9
,
58
4
15
%
Se
c
t
o
r
/
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ai
d
e
r
AC
C
o
o
l
C
r
e
d
i
t
(
1
)
,
(3
)
SP
A
En
e
r
g
y
H
o
u
s
e
C
a
l
l
s
Al
d
e
r
En
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
r
H
o
m
e
s
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
Ai
d
e
r
Or
e
g
o
n
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
W
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
S
c
h
.
SP
A
Re
b
a
t
e
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
Ai
d
e
r
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
R
e
t
r
o
(
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
Al
d
e
r
20
0
5
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
W
i
t
h
A
T
w
i
s
t
(
2
)
IP
C
/
S
P
A
We
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
W
A
O
C
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
$5
4
$
;
6
3
3
'
$1
;
3
7
8
;
2
1
1
40
%
87
;
2
3
7
~4
3
,
62
7
25
%
$1
2
8
,
\)
7
6
$a
6
8
.
,
15
%
$5
,
00
0
$1
0
;
6
9
2
$6
4
,
34
4
17
%
$2
1
0
,
75
2
$3
8
,
73
5
59
0
Ih
o
m
e
s
f
$3
3
9
,
93
6
$1
;
3
5
8
,
40
0
25
%
15
0
,
31
1
22
8
55
7
27
%
27
2
13
9
27
4
,
29
6
82
8
,
59
1
18
1
,
90
0
50
0
38
2
,
90
5
33
%
13
%
66
,
35
5
17
%
51
2
;
9
9
7
97
8
.
25
5
10
4
,
04
2
3,
2
7
1
,
00
0
67
2
,
89
6
47
%
71
,
92
5
ii
;
O
2
i
20
0
,
00
0
99
6
:
7
0
0
18
%
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Aid
e
r
~4
1
!
~
~
50
9
'"
3
7
%
$1
,
39
3
,
85
0
21
8
35
9
13
8
%
Ai
d
e
r
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Ir
r
i
q
a
t
i
o
n
P
e
a
k
R
e
w
a
r
d
s
1
3
08
4
31
,
00
1
32
,
08
5
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
T
o
t
a
l
Ot
h
e
r
SP
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
(
D
E
I
)
Sm
a
l
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
V
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
u
n
d
s
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
Ot
h
e
r
C
&
R
D
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
So
l
a
r
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
$3
5
,
00
1
$2
0
,
00
0
$2
5
;
0
0
0
$1
,
02
5
'
09
2
$4
2
,
73
9
'
$1
1
4
,
78
3
$4
0
;
0
0
0
30
2
,
61
5
66
%
46
%
71
%
Ald
e
r
Ai
d
e
r
Ai
d
e
r
SP
A
SP
A
SP
A Oi
i
i
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
40
%
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
t
o
r
s
Ot
h
e
r
I
P
C
F
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
L
a
b
o
r
Mi
s
c
.
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
E
n
t
r
i
e
s
To
t
a
l
D
S
M
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
33
,
21
5
3
9
,
50
3
11
,
27
7
,
30
9
2
1
,
20
7
,
59
6
22
%
23
%
(1
)
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
$
2
8
7
56
1
i
n
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
l
y
b
o
o
k
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
r
e
v
e
r
s
a
l
i
n
M
a
y
)
(2
)
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
b
u
d
g
e
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
0
5
.
O
n
l
y
2
0
0
6
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
s
h
o
w
n
(3
)
K
W
a
c
t
u
a
l
s
d
e
r
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
s
u
b
s
c
r
i
b
e
r
s
y
t
d
EE
A
G
-
J
u
l
y
,
2
0
0
6
53
4
26
4
32
0
10
0
1
23
%
33
%
13
%
17
%
11
2
94
i
93
3
30
%
19
%
2'5
2
36
%
31
%
.
'
En
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
A
d
v
i
s
o
r
y
G
r
o
u
p
R
e
p
o
r
t
:
DS
M
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
Fo
r
t
h
e
P
e
r
i
o
d
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
to
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
,
2
0
0
5
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
N
u
m
b
e
r
s
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
d
o
l
l
a
r
t
o
t
a
l
s
e
x
c
l
u
d
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
l
a
b
o
r
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
o
n
l
y
t
h
o
s
e
w
i
t
h
m
e
a
s
u
r
a
b
l
e
kW
h
'
S
a
v
i
n
Pe
a
k
k
W
S
a
v
i
n
s
Se
c
t
o
r
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Ac
t
u
a
l
Ta
r
g
e
t
Ac
t
u
a
l
Bu
d
e
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
Ac
t
u
a
l
Ta
r
g
e
t
Ta
r
g
e
t
Ac
t
u
a
l
Ta
r
g
e
t
Ta
r
g
e
t
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ri
d
e
r
AC
C
o
o
l
C
r
e
d
i
t
36
9
00
0
$7
1
8
,
06
4
$6
4
3
,
92
4
11
2
%
74
8
32
0
11
8
%
Ri
d
e
r
En
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
r
H
o
m
e
s
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
20
3
h
o
m
e
s
46
5
h
o
m
e
s
$2
4
7
07
3
$5
0
6
,
72
4
49
%
42
1
83
4
95
2
92
5
44
%
57
4
31
6
44
%
Ri
d
e
r
Sa
v
i
n
g
s
w
i
t
h
a
T
w
i
s
t
35
,
00
8
b
u
l
b
s
10
8
,
19
3
b
u
l
b
s
$7
3
,
15
6
33
5
54
8
12
0
,
93
9
11
0
4
%
15
2
.
29
%
Ri
d
e
r
Or
e
g
o
n
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
W
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
S
c
h
.
$3
5
1
$6
,
00
0
39
8
5,
0
0
0
48
%
BP
A
En
e
r
g
y
H
o
u
s
e
C
a
l
l
s
89
1
83
1
$3
7
5
46
9
$3
9
5
,
26
6
95
%
77
5
,
73
7
33
5
,
63
6
13
3
%
20
3
.
15
2
BP
A
Re
b
a
t
e
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
14
5
$4
6
,
11
7
$7
6
,
34
6
60
%
31
2
,
31
1
45
9
,
28
7
68
%
36
.
BP
A
/
R
a
t
e
s
We
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
59
8
60
0
50
4
,
71
6
64
4
,
00
8
92
%
29
2
,
96
0
45
0
,
00
0
95
%
37
6
.
39
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
T
o
t
a
l
96
4
,
94
6
27
2
,
26
8
91
%
14
0
,
78
8
32
3
,
78
7
11
3
%
08
9
24
8
96
%
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Rid
e
r
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
$1
8
6
,
29
4
$3
1
0
,
25
2
60
%
49
8
,
28
9
34
6
,
00
0
14
4
%
16
3
10
0
16
3
%
Ri
d
e
r
Sc
h
o
o
l
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
75
0
37
5
,
00
0
27
1
Ri
d
e
r
Or
e
g
o
n
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
A
u
d
i
t
,
S
c
h
.
$2
,
97
5
$6
,
00
0
50
%
Ri
d
e
r
Or
e
Q
O
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
v
$8
6
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
T
o
t
a
l
19
1
10
5
31
6
,
25
2
60
%
87
3
28
9
34
6
00
0
83
0
%
43
4
10
0
43
4
%
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Ri
d
e
r
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
$1
,
12
7
94
8
$1
,
66
9
,
4
2
2
68
%
12
,
01
6
,
67
8
8,
4
0
0
,
00
0
1
1
4
3
%
1,
4
0
0
20
0
1
1
1
7
%
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
T
o
t
a
l
12
7
94
8
1 ,
66
9
,
42
2
68
%
01
6
,
67
8
40
0
,
00
0
14
3
%
40
0
20
0
11
7
%
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
69
9
,
~1
6
0
%
Rid
e
r
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
(
2
)
80
s
.
p
(
2
)
$1
0
3
82
3
$9
3
4
,
50
5
11
%
01
2
88
3
40
1
~1
4
7
%
Rid
e
r
Ir
r
i
Q
a
t
i
o
n
P
e
a
k
R
e
w
a
r
d
s
89
4
10
0
0
s
,
43
5
,
57
7
$1
,
4
2
4
,
28
0
10
1
%
40
,
32
3
00
0
13
4
%
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
T
o
t
a
l
93
2
08
0
53
9
,
40
0
35
8
,
78
5
65
%
01
2
88
3
69
9
,
00
0
60
%
40
,
72
4
85
0
13
2
%
Ot
h
e
r
Rid
e
r
Dis
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
(
D
E
I
)
$1
5
,
46
9
$1
0
0
,
00
0
15
%
TB
D
Rid
e
r
Sm
a
l
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
/
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
u
n
d
s
$1
4
89
7
$2
5
,
00
0
60
%
10
0
Rid
e
r
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
n
e
r
Q
V
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
v
A
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
$4
6
4
,
62
8
$4
9
2
32
0
94
%
TB
D
Ot
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
49
4
99
4
61
7
32
0
80
%
64
,
10
0
II
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
k
W
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
(
k
W
a
)
.
T
a
r
g
e
t
v
a
l
u
e
s
f
o
r
p
e
a
k
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
,
de
r
i
v
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
(1
)
W
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
c
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
f
r
o
m
2
0
0
4
(2
)
I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
R
e
w
a
r
d
s
A
c
t
u
l
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
$
3
0
88
1
f
r
o
m
I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
a
r
e
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
o
i
n
t
s
(
s
.
23
,
10
7
73
8
64
7
co
m
p
i
l
e
d
J
a
n
2
0
0
6
,
B
L
S
...
DS
M
R
i
d
e
r
F
u
n
d
s
:
59
2
04
9
99
9
,
98
5
$3
,
59
2
03
4
$6
1
2
54
1
61
2
,
52
6
20
4
57
5
59
1
72
0
$6
,
79
6
29
5
EN
E
R
G
Y
S
T
A
R
N
e
w
R
e
s
.
Co
n
s
t
.
$1
8
3
$1
8
3
$3
1
31
7
$3
1
50
0
$3
1
50
0
$2
0
0
,
00
0
$2
3
1
50
0
$8
8
70
0
$8
8
70
0
(a
)
$1
9
5
91
3
$1
9
5
91
3
$3
4
08
7
$2
3
0
00
0
$2
3
0
00
0
$4
9
1
30
0
$7
2
1
30
0
(b
)
78
8
78
8
78
8
$7
,
78
8
78
8
$2
3
8
6
7
9
$3
0
5
6
8
3
$5
4
4
36
2
$3
0
5
68
3
$5
4
4
,
36
2
$5
4
4
36
2
$3
7
08
4
$3
7
08
4
$5
0
,
25
0
$8
7
33
4
$8
7
33
4
$8
7
33
4
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
P
r
o
r
a
m
s
$2
0
0
,
00
0
$2
0
0
,
00
0
$2
0
0
00
0
$5
5
0
,
00
0
$7
5
0
,
00
0
Ai
r
C
a
r
e
+
P
i
l
o
t
$6
1
4
$6
1
4
$2
4
38
6
$2
5
,
00
0
$2
5
00
0
$2
5
00
0
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
Pr
o
r
a
m
$1
5
0
,
00
0
$1
5
0
,
00
0
$1
5
0
0
0
0
$5
0
0
0
0
0
$6
5
0
0
0
0
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
50
3
50
3
$1
9
6
,
4
9
7
$2
0
0
00
0
$2
0
0
00
0
$3
0
0
0
0
0
$5
0
0
00
0
$2
5
0
,
00
0
$2
5
0
00
0
EE
A
G
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
89
7
48
4
38
0
30
0
78
4
$6
,
68
0
00
0
$1
0
68
0
Ot
h
e
r
Sm
a
l
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
U
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
u
n
d
s
$1
0
4
50
1
$1
0
4
50
1
$1
0
4
,
50
1
$1
0
3
66
9
$2
0
8
,
17
0
(c
)
DS
M
P
e
a
k
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
t
u
d
y
$7
5
,
00
0
$7
5
00
0
$7
5
00
0
$7
5
,
00
0
DS
M
A
n
a
l
s
i
s
&
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
$1
9
89
4
$1
9
,
89
4
$3
0
10
6
$5
0
,
00
0
$5
0
,
00
0
$1
2
5
00
0
$1
7
5
00
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
C
o
s
t
s
$2
4
0
,
57
6
$5
7
3
14
6
$8
1
3
,
72
2
$8
9
8
,
4
4
4
$1
,
4
7
1
58
9
71
2
,
16
6
61
2
66
9
$4
,
32
4
,
83
5
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
(
2
5
4
2
0
1
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
35
1
,
4
7
3
42
6
84
0
$2
,
77
8
,
31
2
($
2
8
5
90
3
)
14
0
93
7
$2
,
49
2
,
40
9
($
2
0
,
94
9
)
$2
,
47
1
,
46
0
(a
)
P
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
,
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
C
C
y
c
l
i
n
g
O
L
C
S
w
i
t
c
h
P
i
l
o
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
A
C
C
y
c
l
i
n
g
P
i
l
o
t
b
u
d
g
e
t
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
n
o
t
e
(
b
)
.
(b
)
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
(
P
U
C
o
r
d
e
r
M
a
r
c
h
1
7
.
$
8
1
0
00
0
i
s
f
o
r
2
0
0
3
20
0
4
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
c
o
s
t
s
.
(c
)
S
m
a
l
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
!
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
u
n
d
i
s
4
%
o
f
O
S
M
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
A
c
c
r
u
a
l
s
t
a
r
t
d
a
t
e
o
f
J
a
n
,
0
1
,
2
0
0
3
)
OS
M
R
i
d
e
r
(
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
2
5
4
2
0
1
)
T
E
T
1
0
/
2
2
/
2
0
0
3
Idaho Power Energy Efficiency Rider
Program Activity Actual and Projected for 2004
Year to Date Projected
1 st Quarter Year End
2004 2004
Idaho Ener Efficienc Rider
Rider Funding 591 021 $ 2 760 000
enditures
Residential
ENERGY STAR Homes Northwest 212 245 000
AC Cycling Pilot (Therm. & Switch)053 313 000
Commercial
Commercial Efficiency Programs (Proposed)254 000
School Building Operator Training 969 000
Air Care+ Pilot
Industrial
Industrial Efficiency Program 797 465 000
Irrigation
Irrigation Efficiency Program 551 224 000
Irrigation Peak Clipping 519 295 000
Other
Programs In Development (Proposed)520 000
DSM Peak Reduction Study 000
Distribution Efficiency Initiative (DEI)125 000
EEAG Meetings 852 000
Small Project! Education Funds 276 000
DSM Analysis & Accounting 126 116 000
Total Expenditures 162,425 $ 2 768 072
Net increase (decrease) in balance 428 595 072)
Rider balance at beginning of period $ 3 273 891 $ 3 273 891
Rider balance at end of period $ 3 702,487 $ 3 265 819
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
CASE NO. IPC-O6-
THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST
OF INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS
RESPONSE TO
REQUEST NO. 37
# '",,"ll) QOCl)W 'C\i '" 'W, 0 Nc:\I(O,...o::tNO ,I.()' '0'1. W o::t O"'t,
"'"
NC,QN' N'C'?(O;o::tN CO 0 at ,C') ,C')NLc)'~;L&Q)'UfN "'"
~ ,
ci'O:r~Nd'IJ)""'co.,C~h('lCNc.Q "'"010 C') ,CDM
('\/
r-.c
, ,
0'1 ('1)
"'""'"
o::t
""'
C'CS..
~ ~;~,~ ~~ ~ ;...' '
CN ..... N ' C') C,Q CD CD o::t C') N N
..... '
W' 0 ;0 W' 0 0 0 0 0 0 tI)- zt.
'E """ """
""" """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """
::s ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ~0 -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
c:c C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I IX)ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- C\I
ffi-
C'CS
C'CS
- 0 C') C\I (0 (0 LO C\I ex) """ C\I I'- C') IX)s::: I'- C\I LO C\I C\I (0 0) I'- LO LO """::s (0 0 (0 (0 I'- C\I ex) (0 C\I """ C') I'- C\I
C\! as ci 0) ci Lri' ci 1'-ct) as ci r--:- Lri'C\I I'- LO ex) 0) 0) C') C') I'- ,- C\I ,-
c:c cq, ~ C')- (0- 0
- ~ q """- q
C\!.
~ ~
C\I ,- ,- C\I C') (0 (0 (0 """ C\I C\I C\I C\Iffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- """ffi-
...
C1)
s:::
o::t,""Mr;,.,"t('l)""WC')cn,..:tNCD, .... N.....LO"
",;
;;",", "'", "'" 0'1 NCD
o::t,
....' ....;
CO 0 '
".."
0;.
", ,
o,CO
o::ioai dcao,ci'.o::i";r.O It)cnNo::tN....;Lt)C')JO c:\IMo:t C\I","
C'CS C')I'-Il)Lt)
' ,
... C')' C') C') C') LO co' cncn "- ,CD LO CDC')g.0 tI)- 0 0 -(I), tI)- 0 00 0 tI)-
'E """ """ """ """ """
""" """ """ """ """ """ """ """
::s ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ~0 -E~~~~~~~~~~~~~
c:c C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I ex)ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- C\!
ffi-
C'CS
C'CS
- 0 """ 0 """ (0 ,- 0) I'- C\I 0) LO ,- ex)s::: I'- C\I C') C\I (0 C\I C\I I'- ex) I'- C') C')::s C') ex) LO LO C\I """ LO """ LO """ C') """ I'-
ci Lri' ct)
"""
- C\! Lri' ,..: Lri' as 0) ct) ci ciE (0 ex) ,- """ ex) ,- (0 ex) 0) .-- 0) (0
c:c 0- q 0)
- ~
C\!. 1'-
- """
- 0)- C\!. I'-:. C\!. C\!.C') C') C\I C') LO ex) 0) ex) I'- LO LO (0 ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- I'-ffi-
...
CI.I
s:::
0";'0'('1);
.... '
T":"C\i..:t'O'I ;o:::t, ;,;.; "'t''N ,cn"C'),;"=2",CD,IO,cn "=2"' CON ~~C')
;~~ ",,";,
8,"': "'"0'I 1ll 1"-"
""':
CD~' ('I)C') CX),O:::t Ln.......-. co 0'1 ' CDQo
""'., ,
1';.
""'
C')C')
C'CS
""'
~ (\I"
""': ~ ,
ce.
~ ,
CC!. eN ~ C')
q ~ .....
'0 ~'a~'mmm~~~~:;g1--
, ,, '" ", , ' ,' '
" 0
'E~~~~~~~~~~~~~::s LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO ,-0 -E~~~~~~~~~~~~~
c:c C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I ex)ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- C\f
ffi-
C'CS
C'CS
(0 I'- (0 0) I'- I'- ex) LO 0 I'- ,- LOs::: C\I C\I 0) C') """ (0 0 (0 0 LO ex) C') """::s """ """ I'- 0 ,- LO """ LO C\I C') 0) .--
0 ,..: o::i as 0) """- 0) ci cD r--:- """ - ..,f C\f ct)
E LO C') """ I'- IX) ex) LO C') (0 ex) 0 0) C\Ic:c qo ~~q~qC')ex)
""" LO C') """ LO 0) 0) 0) I'- (0 LO (0 I'-ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- ffi- I'-ffi-
...
CI.I
s:::
IX) 0 (0 I'- 0 ,- 0 (0 LO LO (0 """.s::: IX) ,- """ 0) 0
,-
I'- """ (0 0) LO C\I
3: ,- I'- LO ex) ,- ex) 0) """ (0 0) C\I LO ,-
r--:- """ci cD r--:- ct) as ct) cD cD ci C\f ffiC') C') """ LO ex) 0) 0) 0) I'- LO """ """ I'-
"'"
s:::.o""";::"S:::-C'lo.-;:::.u
C'CSCI.IC'CSo.C'CS ::S::S::SC1)UOCI.I
~JLL.2C:CZ-'JC:Ccn
.-- 0) ex) """ C\I LO (0 ~ex) C') LO LO 0) 0) C') C') I'- ,- 0) .... C\I C\I """ ex)
3: C\I ex) LO C') C\!. LO- (0- C\!. ,-
- ~
0) ~ Lri'
z cD cD ,..: Lri' (0
,-
C\I ex) ex) C') ct)'- LO LO I'- ex) C\I """ """ C') C\I ,- 0) 0 C\I
,-.--,-,-,-,- ,-
s:::.o""";::"S:::-C'lo.-;:::'Ua:lCl.la:lo.a:I::s::S::SCI.I OCI.I
~JLL.ZC:CZJJC:Ccn
ex) LO I'- C') I'- ,- .-- 0 C\I LO ,- (0 C')
.s::: LO C\I I'- C') ex) """ C') I'- ,- 0) 0
3: I'- ,- I'- 1'-
- """- q """- q ,-
- C')- 0) C')
- ,..:
Z 0) ,..: Lri' """ C\I I'- LO I'- ex) C') ct) .-- ex)
ex) 0) 0) C') """ """ C') C\I .-- 0) C')
,- ,- ,- ,- ,- ,-.-- .--
1;;\II
" 0
"" co
~ C,1;; ')Ii': co
E ,
!:;
u .c:"g-ID- " 0
g ~~
" ,,0
8 8! ~
s:::.o""";::"S:::-C'lo.-;:::'Ua:lCl.la:lo.a:I::s::S::SCI.I UOCI.I
~JLL.zC:CzJJC:Ccn
20
1
0
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
20
1
1
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
Mw
h
89
,
70
8
15
5
95
,
72
7
10
4
77
3
13
2
,
4
3
7
14
7
08
1
14
0
,
96
6
13
3
,
81
4
12
3
,
29
2
11
1
,
77
9
25
2
99
,
56
8
36
2
55
2
Mw
h
88
,
24
3
89
,
68
9
94
,
18
3
10
2
34
9
12
7
,
75
0
14
1
,
4
8
9
13
8
,
99
6
13
1
69
4
12
3
,
29
2
11
1
77
9
25
2
56
8
1 ,
34
1
,
28
4
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ra
n
d
y
A
l
l
p
h
i
n
8
-
29
-
20
0
6
C
S
P
P
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
e
-
m
a
i
L
x
l
s
8/
3
0
/
2
0
0
6
En
e
ra
y
A
m
o
u
n
t
$5
,
02
3
20
4
$5
,
11
1
64
3
00
4
89
6
$4
,
4
2
8
,
97
0
$5
,
63
6
11
8
$9
,
17
0
,
51
8
$9
,
4
9
5
,
4
0
9
$8
,
90
2
,
00
9
20
9
,
11
2
$6
,
10
8
,
68
7
$5
,
83
7
74
4
$6
,
4
2
8
,
64
9
$7
7
35
6
95
8
En
e
ra
y
A
m
o
u
n
t
$5
,
04
2
,
4
9
6
$5
,
13
7
67
4
02
1
,
50
0
$4
,
4
0
8
,
4
0
5
$5
,
54
7
03
0
97
3
,
72
2
$9
,
4
9
4
97
5
$8
,
89
4
19
3
$7
,
29
1
50
3
$6
,
19
7
63
0
$5
,
93
4
12
3
$6
,
53
5
,
56
3
$7
7
,
4
7
8
,
81
4
pa
c
i
t
y
A
m
o
u
n
t
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
,
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
81
5
,
12
4
To
t
a
r
r
$~
;
?
~
7
'
;
7
9
~
,
$~
,
~4
P
.
~
Z
~
6
$4
;
g
:
3
~
,
4~
9
$4
;
$
6
3
,
56
3
,
'
$
~
,
!3
7
.
o
;
7
J
2
49
5
11
2
$9
,
'7
3
.
0
,
0.
0
3
$9
,
13
6
;
60
3
44
3
,
70
6
$6
,
34
3
;
2
8
1
'
$6
,
07
2
,
33
7
$6
,
66
3
,
24
2
$8
0
,
17
2
08
2
pa
c
i
t
y
A
m
o
u
n
t
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
,
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
$2
3
4
,
59
4
$2
3
4
59
4
81
5
,
12
4
To
t
a
l
,
,
,
.
$5
;
2
7
7
,
O9
Q
$5
;
~
7
?
,
26
8
$4
;
?
5
6
;
0
9
4
"
$
4
;
~
4
2
;
99
9
!
$~
;
'
7
!
3
1
,
p2
4
.
$9
,
2.
0
8
,
31
6
$9
,
72
9
,
56
9
$9
,
12
8
;
7
8
6
$7
;
5
2
6
,
09
6
$~
,
4
3
2
,
22
3
$6
,
J
6
8
,
71
7
6;
7
7
.
0
,
15
6
,
$
8
Q
~
2
9
3
,
93
7