HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060816ICIP to IPC 31-46.pdfRECEIVED
2006 AUG 16 AM 8: _(Q~~QJlNr &: (();ATTORNEYS AT LAW IDAHO PU8L1C
UTILITIES COi\HtJISSION
Peter Richardson
Tel: 208-938-7901 Fax: 208-938-7904
peterC1!' rich ardso nand oleary.com
O. Box 7218 Boise, 10 83707 - 515 N. 27th St. Boise, ID 83702
15 August 2006
Ms. Jean Jewell
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
POBox 83720
Boise ID 83720-0074
RE: Case No.lPC-O6-
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the THIRD PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER TO IDAHO
POWER COMPANY in the above case. The original request has been sent to
Idaho Power Company.
An extra copy is also enclosed to be stamped & returned to our office.
Sincerely,
CW\~S
Nina Curtis
Administrative Assistant
encl.
Peter J. Richardson
RICHARDSON & O'LEARY PLLC
515 N. 2ih Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
Telephone: (208) 938-7901
Fax: (208) 938-7904
peter~richardsonandoleary .com
Attorneys for the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power
RECEIVED
2006 AUG 16 AM 8: 09
IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY FOR THE EV ANDER ANDREWSPOWER PLANT
CASE NO. IPC-O6-
THIRD PRODUCTION
REQUEST OF THE
INDUSTRIAL
CUSTOMERS
OF IDAHO POWER TO
IDAHO POWER
COMPANY
Pursuant to Rule 225 of the Rules of Procedure of the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission (the "Commission ), the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power (ICIP) , by
and through their attorney of record, Peter J. Richardson, hereby requests that Idaho
Power Company ("Idaho Power ) provide the following documents.
This production request is to be considered as continuing, and Idaho Power is
requested to provide by way of supplementary responses additional documents that it or
any person acting on its behalf may later obtain that will augment the documents
produced.
1 - THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICIP TO IDAHO POWER
Please provide one copy of your answer to Mr. Richardson at the address noted
above and one copy to Dr. Reading at 6070 Hill Road, Boise, Idaho 83703. Please
provide Dr. Reading s copy in electronic format, if available.
For each item, please indicate the name of the person(s) preparing the answers
along with the job title of such person(s) and the witness at hearing who can sponsor the
answer.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 31:
In response to ICIP's Production Request No., Idaho Power stated
Given the competitiveness of the pricing in the Bennett Mountain RFP, Idaho
Power was able to acquire the incremental 85 MW of capacity (I 73 MW-88 MW
= 85 MW) at an extremely competitive price providing additional generation at
minimal cost while improving reliability for customers.
Please explain how the "additional generation" acquired, above the 88 MW
called for in the 2004 IRP, will change IPC's projected need for future resources as set
forth in the 2004 IRP? For example, will the additional generation acquired obviate the
need for any specific RFPs that were called for in the 2004 IRP?
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 32:
In response to ICIP Production Request No., Idaho Power stated that ". . . by
incorporating a range of sizes in the RFP and ultimately selecting a 173 MW combustion
turbine, Idaho Power has an opportunity to defer additional generation resources in future
resource plans. . ," Please provide a copy of all resource plans in which Idaho Power has
deferred, or would defer, additional generation due to the proposed Evander Andrews
plant's having more generation capabilities than the 88 MW called for in the 2004 IRP.
Also, please provide a description of how the additional generation (above the 88 MW)
2 - THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICIP TO IDAHO POWER
called for in the 2004 IRP) will affect Idaho Power s projected resource needs in the
future. If possible, please describe the types of resources that will be deferred due to the
additional generation.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 33:
In response to ICIP Production Request No. 18, Idaho Power stated that if the
Commission denied Idaho Power s request for a certificate of public convenience and
necessity for the Evander Andrews plant, one option it would most likely pursue would
be "utilizing diesel or temporary gensets." Please describe what diesel or temporary
gensets IPC could use, and provide copies of any studies or documentation regarding the
costs of using those resources.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 34:
Please describe any cap that Idaho Power has placed on its spending for Demand
Side Management programs. If there are any caps placed on Demand Side Management
programs, please explain how the company determines such cap if the program has
proven to be cost-effective (having a savings in energy costs that is greater than the cost
ofthe program).
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 35
Please provide copies of all budgets and supporting work papers for Idaho
Power s DSM programs over the past five years.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 36:
Please provide any analyses conducted by Idaho Power into how the transmission
that will be required to bring the Evander Andrews output to load will affect the
Company s loads and resources.
3 - THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICIP TO IDAHO POWER
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 37:
In Idaho Power s Response to Staffs Request No. 81 , Idaho Power provided a
copy of the Company s 2003 evaluation manual for the peaking resource RFP. Page 29
of that document sets forth a "Cogen and Small Power Forecast (aMW)." Please provide
a copy of the Company s current "Cogen and Small Power Forecast (aMW)." If one is
not available, please fully explain why, and how the Company s decisions with regard to
the 2005 RFP took into account the generation the Company would receive from Cogen
and Small Power Producers.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 38:
With regard to the "Cogen and Small Power Forecast (aMW)" referred to above
in Request for Production No. 40, please explain fully why the document shows no
increase in Cogen and Small Power generation after 2004. Additionally, please explain
whether the Company forecasts any increase in Cogen and Small Power generation after
2006 and beyond.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 39:
With regard to the "Cogen and Small Power Forecast (aMW)" referred to above
in Request for Production No, 40, please explain why the 2005 RFP evaluation manual
did not contain a similar chart or forecast.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 40:
In response to ICIP Request for Production No. 18, Idaho Power describes five
alternatives for meeting peak demand that it would consider if the Commission denies its
request for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for the Evander Andrews
plant. Please describe what efforts the Company has made to determine the costs of those
4 - THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICIP TO IDAHO POWER
alternatives and any estimates the Company has developed of the costs for implementing
these alternatives instead of constructing the Evander Andrews plant.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 41:
Please explain what assumptions the company is making for the future regarding
the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP program), through which
farmlands will be set aside, and irrigation pumps turned off. Specifically, please describe
any assumptions the Company is making regarding decreased peak power requirements
as compared to what they would be without the CREP program. Please explain whether
these assumptions affected the Company s decisions with regard to the 2005 RFP or
Evander Andrews power plant.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 42:
Please explain why the 2005 RFP did not include a power purchase option.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 43:
Please provide any long-term transmission planning documents the Company has
developed that support any claim by the Company that it was planning on building any of
transmission facilities that will be required to bring the proposed Evander Andrews plant
output to load regardless of whether the Evander Andrews plant was built.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 44:
Please clarify whether Idaho Power has a signed contract to receive the natural
gas necessary to run the proposed Evander Andrews plant. If so, please provide a copy of
the contract, and any other documentation or description required to determine the terms
of the contract, including duration and price. If not, please describe what arrangements
will be necessary to secure the required natural gas.
5 - THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICIP TO IDAHO POWER
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45:
Please provide any documents or research that Idaho Power has which evaluates
or relates to the potential for industrial combined heat and power projects in the Treasure
Valley.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 46:
Please describe any efforts Idaho Power has made to look into the use of
emergency generators (i.e. emergency back-up generation installed throughout the region
in commercial or industrial facilities) to meet or reduce peak loads. Please provide any
relevant analyses, documentation, and correspondence.
DATED this 15th day of August, 2006.
RICHARDSON & O'LEARY PLLC
6 - THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF ICIP TO IDAHO POWER
ICIP PRODUCTION
REQUESTS 47 - 53
TO IDAHO POWER CO.
ARE CO NFID E NTIAL
AND ARE FILED
SEP ARA TEL Y
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 15th day of August, 2006, I caused a true and
correct copy of the foregoing THIRD PRODUCTION REQUEST OF THE INDUSTRIAL
CUSTOMERS OF IDAHO POWER to be served by the method indicated below, and
addressed to the following:
Jean Jewell
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street (83702)
Post Office Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
(X) u.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid
( ) Hand Delivered
( )
Overnight Mail
( ) Facsimile
( ) Electronic Mail
Barton L. Kline
Idaho Power Company
1221 W, Idaho St. (83702)
PO Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
bkline~idahopower. com
mmoen~idahopower. com
( ) u.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid
( )
Hand Delivered
( ) Overnight Mail
( )
Facsimile
(X) Electronic Mail
Donovan Walker
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington (83702)
PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Donovan. walker~puc.idaho. gov
( ) U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid
( ) Hand Delivered
( )
Overnight Mail
( )
Facsimile
(X) Electronic Mail
James C. Miller
Sr. Vice President, Generation
Idaho Power Company
1221 W, Idaho St. (83702)
PO Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
i immiller~idahopower .com
( ) u.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid
( ) Hand Delivered
( )
Overnight Mail
( )
Facsimile
(X) Electronic Mail
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - 1
Ronald L. Williams
Williams Bradbury, P.
PO Box 2128
Boise, ID 83701
ron~wi1liamsbradbury .com
( ) U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid
( ) Hand Delivered
( ) Overnight Mail
( )
Facsimile
(X) Electronic Mail
Robert D. Looper
President
Mountain View Power, Inc.
1015 W Hays Street
Boise, ID 83702
rlooper~spellc.com
( ) u.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid
( ) Hand Delivered
( )
Overnight Mail
( )
Facsimile
(X) Electronic Mail
Signed: ~\ C0J\ ti ~
Nina M. Curtis
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - 2