20060714IPC to Staff 61.pdf

,,!
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
O. BOX 70
BOISE, IDAHO 83707
RECEIVED
2006 JUL 14 AM 8: An IDACORP Company
IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
July 13, 2006
Rick Sterling
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
P. O. Box 83720
Boise , Idaho 83720-0074
Re:Case No. IPC-06-
Idaho Power Company s Response to the First Production
Request of Commission Staff
Dear Rick:
Please find enclosed the supplemental information that you requested regarding
Request for Production No. 61.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours
~(f;.
Monica B. Moen
MBM:sh
Enclosure
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone], E-mail MMoenrBIidahopower.com
BARTON L. KLINE ISB #1526
MONICA B. MOEN ISB #5734
Idaho Power Company
P. O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
Telephone: [phone]
FAX Telephone: [phone]
Attorney for Idaho Power Company
Street Address for Express Mail
1221 West Idaho Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
. ,.
RECEIVED
2006 JUL 14 AM 8: 07
IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
AND NECESSITY FOR THE RATE BASING
OF THE EV ANDER ANDREWS POWER
PLANT.
) CASE NO. IPC-06-
) (To Rick Sterling)
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
RESPONSE TO THE FIRST
PRODUCTION REQUEST OF
COMMISSION STAFF
COMES NOW, Idaho Power Company ("Idaho Power" or "the Company")
and , in response to the First Production Request of the Commission Staff to Idaho Power
Company dated June 16, 2006, herewith submits the following supplemental information:
REQUEST NO. 61: Please discuss the status of Idaho Power s plans to
upgrade the Borah-West transmission path. Was an upgraded Borah-West transmission
path assumed to be available in the evaluation of RFP bids? Were transmission cost
estimates for projects east of the Treasure Valley area less in the March 2005 RPF than
in previous thermal RFPs due to an assumed upgraded Borah-West transmission path?
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF COMMISSION STAFF, Page
RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 61: Idaho Power did not receive any
bids in this RFP that would require energy to cross the Borah-West transmission
constraint. As a result, upgrades to the Borah-West transmission path did not affect
favorably or unfavorably the evaluations of any bids received in this RFP.
The response to this request was prepared by F. Gregory Hall , Principal
Engineer, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney,
Idaho Power Company.
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 61: The Borah West
upgrade included in the 2004 IRP is intended to support anticipated renewable
generation that will be located in Eastern Idaho. Because this upgrade is required for
generation requirements independent of the peaking resource, it cannot be regarded as
an alternative to construction of an additional peaking resource to meet electrical
demands.
The response to this request was prepared by F. Gregory Hall, Principal
Engineer, Idaho Power Company, in consultation with Barton L. Kline, Senior Attorney,
Idaho Power Company.
Dated this 13th day of July, 2006.
f3;
MONICA B. MOEN
Attorney for Idaho Power Company
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO THE
FIRST PRODUCTION REQUEST OF COMMISSION STAFF, Page 2