Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120411PAC to Exergy Attach1.1.pdfIRP Avoided Cost Modeling December 15, 2011 1 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 1 of 14 IRP Avoided Cost Modeling METHODOLOGY 2 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 2 of 14 Idaho Avoided Cost Background •The “IRP” Methodology: –“Ensures that utilities will not be required to acquire resource priced higher than would result from a least cost planning process” - IPUC Order 25844 at p.6 15 000 13,000 14,000 15,000 (Me g a w a t t s ) Lake Side 2 in 2014 CCCT in 2016 CCCT in 2019 11,000 12,000 13,000 ap a c i t y O b l i g a t i o n ( Existing and Non-deferrable Capacity 9,000 10,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Sy s t e m C 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 3 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 3 of 14 Diagram of Avoided Cost Modeling IRP Avoided Capacity C t Preferred Resource P tf li GRID Linear Programming Avoided Energy Cost Cost $/KW-yr (1) Portfolio Proposed QF 1.Perform two simulations: Linear Programming Power Cost Simulation Energy Cost $/MWh (2) ( )(2)Resource 1.Perform two simulations: Base Simulation: Excludes proposed QF resource AC Simulation: Includes proposed QF resource and partial displacement 2.Calculate dollar difference between Base Simulation and AC Simulation 3 Less wind and solar integration charge3.Less wind and solar integration charge 4 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 4 of 14 Partial Displacement Illustration (MW) Partial Dispalcement: CCCT (Dry "F" 2x1) - East Side Resource (4500') -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Base Base Load Thermal Canal Drop Hydro Solar Wind ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- IRP Nameplate Capacity 596 9 596 9 596 9 596 9 596 9IRP Nameplate Capacity 596.9 596.9 596.9 596.9 596.9 Committed Resources (Queue) (1) 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 Proposed QF Capacity Contribution - 20.0 17.2 7.0 1.1 ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- Total Displacement 36 56.1 53.3 43.1 37.2 ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- New Nameplate Capacity 560.8 540.8 543.6 553.8 559.7 Footnotes: (1) Base includes displacement from QF contracts signed subsequent to IRP 5 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 5 of 14 Avoided Capacity Costs •Capacity costs generally –Non-energy costs (i.e. capital, O&M, interest, return on rate base, etc.) –Avoided capacity cost entails modified resource selection in IRP process •Next deferrable IRP resource addition –June 2016 addition of Currant Creek 2 - 597 MW CCCT (Dry "F" 2x1) •Partial displacement –Deferrable resource size reduced by QF contribution to peak –Ensures QF capacity price same as integrated resource planning process –Captures energy benefits of deferrable resource not provided by QF di h bili •e.g. dispatchability, reserves 6 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 6 of 14 Price Provided to QF •Energy price –Stated in $/MWH –Monthly HLH/LLH values •Capacity price –Stated in $/KW-YR –Annual values •Less: wind and solar integrationg –$6.50/MWH pursuant to IPUC Order 31021 7 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 7 of 14 IRP Avoided Cost Modeling THE GRID MODEL 8 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 8 of 14 The GRID Model •GRID (Generation and Regulation Initiative Decision Tools) •Energy model •Simulate system operations •Resources “dispatched” to serve load obligation by most economic means •Least-cost dispatch linear programming algorithm •Used in general rate cases and avoided costs 9 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 9 of 14 GRID Logic Input DataInput Data = Intermediate GRID calculation = GRID Calculated Input to Dispatch (LP) Thermal Hydro Long Term  Contracts Short Term  Firm Hourly LTC DispatchPr e HourlyHydroDispatch De‐rated Availability Commitment Logic Retail Load Hourly LTC Dispatche‐Di s p a t c h Hourly Hydro Dispatch Reserve Requirement Allocated Reserves Commitment Logic Thermal Availability Hourly Purchases and Sales Loadrequirements Prices Transmission capacity Linear Program Objective Function Hourly LTC DispatchHourly Hydro Dispatch “Must Run” Resources from Market caps Di s p Load requirements Prices Transmission capacity Net Power Cost System Balancing Pre‐dispatch Market capspat c h Ou t p uuts 10 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 10 of 14 GRID Topology Mid Columbia Jim Bridger Wyoming Central Wyoming NortheastYakima Walla Walla Colstrip$ Bridger BPA* multi-point Path TronaGoshen Hot Springs BPA NITS* Brady* IPC West* Utah North Monsanto, SW WY Path C(S)* cut plane C(N)* IPC East* Hermiston Mead LegendGC-PP West Main Utah South Colorado Central Oregon Mona $ $ COB SP15 g - Load points - Resource - Liquid market - FTR APS* Trans.PV 4C Cholla Chehalis NOB Oregon $$ $ $ $ $ * Not a physical path/area – represents contract terms 11 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 11 of 14 IRP Avoided Cost Modeling ILLUSTRATIVE STUDIES 12 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 12 of 14 Summary Avoided Cost: 20-Year Nominal Levelized --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Description Capacity (MW) Capacity Factor Capacity Contribution Energy ($/MWh) Capacity ($/kW-yr) Est. $/MWH at Stated CF---------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ Base Load Thermal 20 92.00% 100.00% $45.08 $118.16 $59.74 Canal Drop Hydro 20 34.00% 86.00% $48.16 $101.62 $82.27 Solar 20 22.60% 35.00% $44.41*$41.36 $65.30 Wind 22 34.40%5.00% $37.20*$5.91 $39.16 * Avoided energy cost includes reduction for wind and solar integration charge. 13 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 13 of 14 IRP Avoided Cost Modeling QUESTIONS 14 ID GNR-E-11-03 Exergy 1 Attachment Exergy 1 -1 Attach Exergy 1 -1.pdf page 14 of 14