Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20260831APPLICATION.pdf ' 11 RECEIVED Avista Corp. August 31, 2026 1411 East Mission P.O. Box 3727 IDAHO PUBLIC UTII ITIES COMMISSION Spokane, Washington 99220-0500 Telephone 509-489-0500 AVU-E-26-11 Toll Free 800-727-9170 August 31, 2026 Commission Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd. Bldg. 8, Suite 201-A Boise, Idaho 83714 Re: Avista Corporation Application for Determination of 2025 Electric Energy Efficiency Expenses as Prudently Incurred Dear Commission Secretary: Enclosed for filing with the Commission is the Application of Avista Corporation, dba Avista Utilities (Avista or "the Company"), requesting a determination of prudence for the Company's electric energy efficiency expenditures from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025. In support of its Application, Avista has provided Exhibit No. 1, which contains the Company's 2025 Annual Conservation Report (ACR). If you have any questions regarding this filing, please contact me at (509) 495-7839 or aid 'me.stpeter(�b,avistacop2.com. Sincerely, /j./ Peuue .5t ;Ve&n Jaime St Peter Regulatory Affairs Manager Enclosures cc: Avista Energy Efficiency Advisory Group I ANNIGLOGOVAC 2 ISB #13010 3 COUNSEL, LEGAL DEPARTMENT 4 AVISTA CORPORATION 5 P.O. BOX 3727, MSC 33 6 1411 EAST MISSION AVENUE 7 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220-3727 8 TELEPHONE: (509) 495-7341 9 EMAIL: ANNI.GLOGOVAC@AVISTACORP.COM 10 11 12 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 13 14 ) 15 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) CASE NO. AVU-E-26-_ 16 OF AVISTA CORPORATION FOR A ) 17 DETERMINATION OF 2025 ELECTRIC ) APPLICATION OF 18 ENERGY EFFICIENCY EXPENSES AS ) AVISTA CORPORATION 19 PRUDENTLY INCURRED ) 20 ) 21 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 Avista Corporation,doing business as Avista Utilities(Avista or the Company),at 1411 24 East Mission Avenue, Spokane, Washington, pursuant to Idaho Code § 61-524 and IDAPA 25 31.01.01, Rules of Procedure (RP), Rule 52 et seq., of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission 26 (IPUC or Commission), hereby respectfully requests that the Commission issue an order 27 designating Avista's electric energy efficiency expenditures from January 1, 2025 through 28 December 31, 2025, funded through the Company's Schedule 91 Demand Side Management 29 (DSM) Rider Adjustment (DSM Rider), in the amount of$20,688,852, as prudently incurred. 30 This filing will hereafter be referred to as the "Application". 31 The Company also requests that this filing be processed under the Commission's 32 Modified Procedure Rules (RP 201-204)through the use of written comments. 33 Avista is a utility that provides service to approximately 423,000 retail electric 34 customers and 383,000 natural gas customers in a 30,000 square-mile service territory covering Application of Avista Corporation Page 1 Case No. AVU-G-26- I portions of northern Idaho, eastern Washington, and Oregon. The largest community served 2 by Avista is Spokane, Washington, which is the location of its corporate headquarters. The 3 Company requests that all correspondence related to this Application be directed to: 4 Anni Glogovac Shawn Bonfield 5 Counsel for Regulatory Affairs Sr. Manager, Regulatory Policy & Strategy 6 Avista Corporation Avista Corporation 7 P.O. Box 3727 P.O. Box 3727 8 1411 E. Mission Avenue, MSC 27 1411 E. Mission Avenue, MSC 27 9 Spokane, Washington 99220-3727 Spokane, Washington 99220-3727 10 Telephone: (509) 495-7341 Telephone: (509)495-2782 11 E-mail: anni.glo og vackavistacorp.com E-mail: shawn.bonfieldkavistacorp.com 12 13 Avista Dockets (Electronic Only) -AvistaDockets(kavistacorp.com 14 Avista has included the following attachment in support of this filing, which is also 15 referenced throughout the Application below: 16 a) Exhibit No. 1 —Avista 2025 Idaho Annual Conservation Report 17 II. BACKGROUND 18 Avista has continuously offered energy efficiency services since 1978. Through these 19 offerings, the Company seeks to provide customers with programs and information that may 20 help them manage their energy use and to utilize cost-effective energy efficiency resources to 21 meet the energy and demand needs of the Company's electrical and natural gas systems. These 22 efforts are funded through Avista's Electric and Natural Gas DSM Riders (Schedule 91 and 23 Schedule 191, respectively). 24 The Company's Energy Efficiency Program(Program)includes options for residential, 25 commercial and industrial, and low-income customer segments. The Program includes 26 prescriptive, midstream, direct-install, site-specific, market transformation, and customer 27 education offerings. Each program within the Company's electric energy efficiency portfolio 28 (Portfolio)is designed and administered with consideration of cost-effectiveness and is subject 29 to independent evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V). The results of the Application of Avista Corporation Page 2 Case No. AVU-G-26- I Company's and third-parry evaluator's 2025 assessments are contained in Avista's 2025 2 Annual Conservation Report (ACR). The 2025 ACR includes the following appendices and 3 supplements: 4 1) Appendix A—2025 Electric Impact Evaluation Report 5 2) Appendix B —2025 Natural Gas Impact Evaluation Report 6 3) Appendix C—2025 Cost-Effectiveness Tables 7 4) Appendix D—2025 Expenditures by Program 8 5) Appendix E—2025 Energy Efficiency Activity by Program 9 6) Appendix F—NEEA 2025 Annual Savings Report—Electric 10 7) Appendix G—NEEA 2025 Annual Savings Report—Natural Gas 11 8) Appendix H—NEEA 2025 Annual Savings Report Addendum 12 9) Appendix I—List of 2025 EEAG Meetings and Topics 13 14 III. ELECTRIC PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 15 The Company requests that the Commission determine that the expenditures incurred 16 during the 2025 Program year, totaling $20,688,852 for the electric Program, were prudent and 17 in the public interest. Of this amount, $15,777,768 was paid as customer incentives, $3,769,799 18 supported non-incentive and labor activities, and $1,141,285 supported market transformation, 19 conservation potential assessment (CPA), and EM&V activities. Actual electric expenditures 20 were approximately 195 percent of the planned electric budget of$10,594,013, consistent with 21 verified electric savings reaching double the annual target. 22 As noted within the ACR, the variance between planned and actual expenditures was 23 driven primarily by the level and mix of customer participation and the resulting cost of 24 delivering verified savings. Electric incentives increased from a planned level of$6,152,749 25 to $15,777,768. Higher incentive expenditures were primarily attributable to participation and 26 savings substantially exceeding planned levels in the Small Business Direct Install Lighting 27 and Commercial/Industrial Site-Specific programs, which were the largest contributors to 28 verified electric savings for the year. Eligible incentives were paid as customer projects were Application of Avista Corporation Page 3 Case No. AVU-G-26- I completed in accordance with program requirements. Broader market conditions, including 2 elevated equipment, labor, and project costs, contractor availability constraints, tariff-related 3 uncertainty, and higher borrowing costs, also affected the cost, timing, and mix of completed 4 projects. 5 The Company reports the Schedule 91 balance on a quarterly basis to Commission Staff 6 and its Energy Efficiency Advisory Group(EEAG or Advisory Group). The electric tariff rider 7 began 2025 with an underfunded balance of$8,792,454. During 2025,the Company collected 8 $4,917,816 in electric energy efficiency rider revenue and incurred $20,688,852 in electric 9 Program expenditures, resulting in an underfunded year-end balance of$24,563,489. 10 The increased underfunded balance was primarily influenced by higher-than-expected 11 participation in the Small Business Direct Install Lighting program. Prescriptive Lighting also 12 experienced participation above forecasted levels, while Commercial/Industrial Site-Specific 13 projects contributed to higher incentive costs through large, savings-intensive projects. These 14 expenditures supported completed customer projects and verified energy savings that 15 substantially exceeded the Portfolio's annual target. 16 Table No. 1 —Schedule 91 Tariff Rider Activity for 2025 EV 17 TariffRider i i I Expenditures 18 January $417.667 $1,308,135 February $412,285 $2,396,922 Marra $363,516 $1,136,665 19 Aril $331,792 $2,478,438 Ma $294,010 $2,608,944 20 June $458,536 5605,736 J $335,759 $2,042.747 21 August $350,769 $1,269,811 September $346,092 $2,040,798 22 October $385,261 $1,180,157 November $532.274 $1,924,689 23 December $699,854 $1,695,910 Total $4 17 16 $20 688 2 24 Application of Avista Corporation Page 4 Case No. AVU-G-26- I IV. 2025 PROGRAM PERFORMANCE 2 The Company's energy efficiency targets are established annually through its electric 3 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and annual business planning processes. In 2025, the higher 4 expenditures encountered corresponded with substantial customer benefits. Local electric 5 programs delivered 35,456,276 kWh in independently verified savings against a planned target 6 of 17,696,834 kWh, or 200 percent of target. The increased spending therefore reflects strong 7 customer participation and delivery of verified cost-effective savings rather than an increase 8 in expenditures without corresponding Portfolio benefits. In addition, Commercial/Industrial 9 programs produced 32,678,682 kWh, Residential programs produced 2,635,482 kWh, and the 10 Low-Income Program produced 142,112 kWh. NEEA programs added 6,833 MWh, bringing 11 total 2025 electric savings, including regional market transformation, to 42,289 MWh. Table 12 No. 2 summarizes local verified savings by sector. 13 Table No. 2—2025 Electric Savings by Program Sector 14 Program Sector Planned Savings Verified Savings Percent of Commercial/Industrial 12,890,865 32,678,682 254% 15 Residential 4,684,420 2,635,482 56% Low-Income 121,549 142,112 117•% 16 Total Local Proum 17,696,834 35,456,276 200% 17 Avista evaluates the effectiveness of its electric Portfolio using the Utility Cost Test 18 (UCT), Total Resource Cost (TRC), Participant Cost Test (PCT), and Ratepayer Impact 19 Measure (RIM). The UCT assesses cost-effectiveness from the utility perspective, while the 20 TRC considers total resource costs and benefits regardless of who pays. For 2025, the electric 21 Portfolio achieved a UCT ratio of 1.40, a TRC ratio of 1.12, a PCT ratio of 2.09, and a RIM 22 ratio of 1.24 based on verified savings. While the Company quantifies all of these cost tests for 23 Portfolio evaluation, the primary measurement of cost-effectiveness for its Idaho DSM 24 Program is the UCT. Application of Avista Corporation Page 5 Case No. AVU-G-26- I The electric Portfolio's UCT result was primarily supported by strong verified savings 2 from high-volume programs, particularly lighting and midstream offerings, where realization 3 rates were close to or slightly above 100 percent. Although some smaller programs produced 4 lower realization rates,' their effect was outweighed by the larger savings contributions from 5 cost-effective measures across the Portfolio. 6 Table No. 3 —2025 Electric Cost-Effectiveness 7Costs Ratio UtMy Cost Test C $26,734,655 $19,039,212 1.40 8 Total Resource Cost C $26,734,655 $23,820,458 1.12 Participant Cost Test $42,092,287 $20,138,877 2.09 9 Ratepayer La act Measure $26 734 655 $21 535 882 1.24 10 V. PROGRAM EVALUATION 11 In addition to the cost-effectiveness analyses conducted by the Company for the 12 Program, Avista also contracts with independent third-party consultants to provide Program 13 EM&V activities each year. These EM&V activities are used to validate and report verified 14 energy savings related to the Company's energy efficiency measures and Program offerings, 15 as well as provide viable recommendations to improve Program performance, enact changes 16 to Program components, and decide whether and when to phase out measures. 17 For the 2025 Program year, ADM, a Qualus Company, was retained by Avista to 18 perform the impact evaluation for Avista's electric Program, including residential, commercial 19 and industrial, and low-income components.2 The impact evaluation validates gross electric 20 and demand savings attributable to the Portfolio and identifies opportunities to improve 21 savings calculations, Program tracking, documentation, and evaluation methods. 1 Please see the 2025 Electric Impact Evaluation Report,Appendix A of the ACR,for the full list of realization rates for each program. 2 Avista's EM&V contractors assess its Program on an annual basis,with the exception of low-income,which undergoes EM&V every two years. Application of Avista Corporation Page 6 Case No. AVU-G-26- I The 2025 electric impact evaluation concluded that the Portfolio achieved a 100 percent 2 realization rate and 35,456,276 kWh in annual verified savings.Program-level results included 3 realization rates of 102 percent for Small Business Direct Install Lighting, 102 percent for 4 Prescriptive Lighting, 100 percent for Residential Midstream, and 101 percent for the Home 5 Insulation Program. These results demonstrate that expected and independently verified 6 savings were closely aligned for the Portfolio's principal savings-producing programs. 7 Evaluators also identified opportunities to improve alignment with applicable Regional 8 Technical Forum (RTF) inputs and to strengthen measure-level documentation and tracking, 9 particularly for appliance and low-income measures. Avista will consider and implement 10 applicable recommendations through its ongoing program planning, documentation, and 11 quality-control processes. 12 VI. ADDITIONAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 13 CommerciaUIndustrial Sector 14 Avista's Commercial/Industrial electric Portfolio achieved 32,678,682 kWh in verified 15 savings,or 254 percent of its 2025 planned savings. The Small Business Direct Install Lighting 16 program completed 1,924 projects and delivered 18,962,969 kWh,representing more than half 17 of local electric savings, with a 102 percent realization rate. The Site-Specific program 18 completed 15 projects and delivered approximately 9.5 million kWh through large, savings- 19 intensive custom projects. Prescriptive Lighting delivered 3,900,750 kWh with a 102 percent 20 realization rate. 21 During 2025, Avista actively managed the Small Business Direct Install Lighting 22 program to address higher-than-expected demand, manage spending, improve cost- 23 effectiveness, and align participation with program intent. The Company refined customer 24 eligibility, excluded certain customer and project types, established a program-wide cost-per- Application of Avista Corporation Page 7 Case No. AVU-G-26- I kWh threshold, tightened product eligibility in response to updated efficiency standards, and 2 coordinated with trade allies to balance installation capacity and address equipment 3 availability. The Company continued to provide commercial and industrial customers multiple 4 participation pathways, including Midstream, Prescriptive, Direct Install Lighting, Site- 5 Specific, Building Operator Certification, and Business Partner Program offerings. The 6 Business Partner Program supported rural small businesses through no-cost high-level energy 7 assessments, contractor connections through the Trade Ally Bid program, and assistance 8 navigating available efficiency incentives. Evaluation findings showed that the largest 9 commercial and industrial programs generally produced verified savings closely aligned with 10 expected values, supporting the Portfolio's overall cost-effectiveness. 11 The Site-Specific pathway supported unique or complex projects requiring custom 12 savings calculations or technical assistance from Avista's energy engineering team. The 13 program's custom approach allowed evaluators to apply project-appropriate verification 14 methods and capture substantial savings opportunities not addressed by standard prescriptive 15 offerings. 16 Residential Sector 17 In 2025, nearly $2.1 million in rebates and direct benefits were provided to Idaho 18 residential customers. Residential electric programs achieved 2,635,482 kWh in verified 19 savings, or approximately 56 percent of the sector's planned savings. The Residential 20 Midstream program was the primary savings driver,producing 2,234,477 kWh and more than 21 84 percent of verified residential electric savings, with a 100 percent realization rate. 22 Additional verified savings were provided by Residential Shell, Home Energy Audit, Fuel 23 Conversion,ENERGY STAR/NEEM Manufactured Homes,Appliances, and Home Insulation 24 offerings. Application of Avista Corporation Page 8 Case No. AVU-G-26- I In August 2025,Avista transitioned residential insulation measures from a prescriptive 2 pathway to a direct-install model to simplify participation, improve customer experience, and 3 strengthen contractor oversight and documentation. The change followed quality-assurance 4 work concerning contractor practices and installation quality. Under the new model, 5 participating contractors assess the home, confirm eligibility, install qualifying measures, and 6 handle required documentation,with rebates applied upfront to reduce customer costs. 7 The Low-Income Program delivered 142,112 kWh in verified electric savings, or 117 8 percent of its planned savings, through Avista's partnership with the Community Action 9 Partnership (CAP) agency serving its Idaho service territory. Avista provided $875,000 in 10 weatherization funding and an additional $75,000 for conservation education and customer 11 outreach during 2025. The program supported comprehensive weatherization, energy 12 efficiency, health and safety, and customer education activities for income-qualified 13 households. 14 VIL CONCLUSION AND REQUEST FOR RELIEF 15 As described above and in the 2025 ACR, Avista respectfully requests that the 16 Commission issue an Order designating Avista's 2025 total electric Energy Efficiency 17 Program expenditures of $20,688,852 as prudently incurred and in the public interest. The 18 expenditures supported 35,456,276 kWh in independently verified local savings, equal to 200 19 percent of the annual target; the electric Portfolio achieved a 100 percent realization rate and a 20 UCT benefit-cost ratio of 1.40; and most expenditures were associated with customer 21 incentives and the delivery of completed energy efficiency projects. The higher-than-planned 22 expenditures were therefore accompanied by substantially higher-than-planned verified 23 savings and continued Portfolio cost-effectiveness. Avista actively managed program 24 eligibility, delivery, documentation, and cost controls during 2025 and incorporated evaluator Application of Avista Corporation Page 9 Case No. AVU-G-26- I and stakeholder feedback through its ongoing program planning and quality-control processes. 2 The Company also requests that this Application be processed under the Commission's 3 Modified Procedure Rules through the use of written comments. 4 Dated this 3 1'day of August 2026. 5 AVISTA CORPORATION 6 7 By WYV"'O__ 8 Patrick Ehrbar 9 Director of Regulatory Affairs 10 Avista Corporation Application of Avista Corporation Page 10 Case No. AVU-G-26-