Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA202602 NOPV Response 2406 N. Dollar Road Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Submitted to Jeff Brooks via electronic mail at Jeff.Brooks@pue.idaho.gov. July 7, 2026 Mr. Jeff Brooks Pipeline Safety Program Manager Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 Chinden Blvd., Building 8, Suite 201-A Boise, ID 83714 Re: IPUC Moscow District Field Audit Probable Violation Letter—Avista Response Dear Mr. Brooks: In your letter of May 28, 2026, you listed a Probable Violation discovered during the 2026 Moscow Field Audit that was conducted May 19-20, 2026. In this letter we have provided a restatement of the probable violations as noted in your letter, and Avista's response. Notice of Probable Violation (NOPV) References: 49 CFR §192.605 49 CFR §192.703 49 CFR 192.747 Avista Gas Standards Manual Section 5.13 Description of NOPVs 1. 49 CFR §192 605 Procedural manual for operations maintenance and emergencies General. Each operator shall prepare and follow for each pipeline, a manual of written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance activities and for emergency response. For transmission lines, the manual must also include procedures for handling abnormal operations. This manual must be reviewed and updated by the operator at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year. This manual must be prepared before operations of a pipeline system commence. Appropriate parts of the manual must be kept at locations where operations and maintenance activities are conducted. (2) Controlling corrosion in accordance with the operations and maintenance requirements of Subpart I of this part. 49 CFR & 192,703 General No person may operate a segment of pipeline,unless it is maintained in accordance with this subpart. 49 CFR 6192,747 Valve Maintenance: Distribution System. (a) Each valve, the use of which may be necessary for the safe operation of a distribution system, must be checked and serviced at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but a least once each calendar year. Avista Gas Standards Manual-Section 5.13 Valve GENERAL VALVE MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION NOTES: Maintenance Avista gas distribution and transmission valves, based on the criteria established in Specification 2.14, Valve Design, shall be maintained to ensure they are operable and serviced according to the following schedule: FrequencyValve Category Emergency omit lion b Trarin�ssion VaWS(VaMes as spwftd in§192.1T9 and Once each cmkmdw Vow.tat §192.181)that are necessary for Emen+W to etooeed 15 I'Mma a Operabom Emergency Curb Valves (Inaccessible meter Once each calendar year, not sets, churches, schools, hospitals,jails, to exceed 15 months convalescent homes. etc. Regulator Stabon Isdadon VaWs)(isobbon Once each calendar year, not valves as spedhd by 1192.181 to exceed 15 nvnihs Every five years not to exceed Secondary Valves 63 months (This is a Best Practice but not a requirement) Finding(s)- The inlet valve associated with Regulator Station 3760 in Deary, Idaho was not identified as an emergency valve. Additionally, no annual inspection records for this valve were provided when requested and have not been made available to operating personnel as required. Avista Response to NOPVs: Avista concurs that the inlet valve to Regulator Station 3760 was neither properly mapped in Avista's GIS Mapping system nor receiving the appropriate annual maintenance as required by Federal Code and Avista Standards. Even with this being the case, when the valve was exercised during the audit, it performed properly. Back in 2020, Station 3760 was upgraded to a District Regulator Station (DR)from a Farm Tap (SSFT)as part of Avista's Annual review of DR/SSFTs. At that time,the inlet valve should have been verified to physically exist and be appropriately mapped in the GIS. Neither of these activities occurred as that step has, erroneously, not been a documented/formal part of the annual DR/SSFT review process. Moving forward,the process is being enhanced to ensure all stations that are changed to a DR, have an inlet valve that is designated an emergency valve and is set up appropriately for annual maintenance. Additionally, the Avista Idaho Compliance Specialist researched back five years looking for similar errors where SSFTs were converted to a DR and the inlet valve was potentially overlooked for emergency valve classification and found no such problems. Since the Moscow Audit, the valve in question has been formally maintained (Done on 6/11/26) and mapped (Identified as PUM 1206). Annual Maintenance has been set up and will occur as required moving forward. Respectfully Submitted, Ryan Bean, PE �KF2 Director,Natural Gas RB/rkb Cc: Carie Mourin, Manager, Gas Compliance, and Integrity Ted Boyle, Manager, Lewiston Gas Operations