Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20260731Application.pdf Preston N. Carter, ISB No. 8462 GIVENS PURSLEY LLP 601 West Bannock Street RECEIVED P.O. Box 2720 JULY 31, 2026 Boise, Idaho 83701-2720 IDAHO PUBLIC Office: (208) 388-1200 UTILITIES COMMISSION Fax: (208) 388-1300 prestoncarter@givenspursley.com Attorneys for Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF VEOLIA WATER Case No. VEO-W-26-02 IDAHO, INC.'S APPLICATION FOR AN ACCOUNTING ORDER FOR COSTS APPLICATION FOR ACCOUNTING ORDER ASSOCIATED WITH LOAD STUDY Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. ("Veolia" or "Company"), pursuant to Idaho Code sections 61- 502 and section 503, Idaho Code §§ 61-502 and 61-503, and the Idaho Public Utility Commission ("Commission")Rule of Procedure 52, IDAPA 31.01.01.052,respectfully submits this Application for Accounting Order seeking deferred accounting treatment for the incremental costs associated with a required load study. Please address communications regarding this Application to: Preston N. Carter Brandon J. Pierce Givens Pursley LLP Senior Counsel 601 W. Bannock St. Regulated Water Boise, Idaho 83702 Veolia North America prestoncarter@givenspursley.com Brandon.Pierce@veolia.com stephaniew@givenspursley.com 1. INTRODUCTION I. As part of the Stipulation and Settlement of the most recent Application of Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. for a General Rate Case, Case No. VEO-W-24-01 ("Settlement"), the parties to APPLICATION PAGE I OF 7 that Settlement ("Parties") agreed to hold, at least on a semi-annual basis, workshops to discuss several issues, including a load study. The discussions were intended to set forth the framework for a contemplated load study including: the study goal; definitions; appropriate criteria to use in a load study; the availability and sufficiency of AMI data to support an accurate and reliable load study; the possibility of using sampling techniques to support a load study; the potential classes to be included in a load study; costs associated with gathering additional data and potential necessary meter deployments; and other relevant topics. 2. The Parties intended to discuss in good faith with the goal of having an agreed-upon framework for the load study within twelve months of the Commission's approval of the Settlement. 3. The Settlement commits the Company to conduct the load study in accordance with the agreed-upon framework by June 2028. However, the Parties also recognized that this schedule is dependent upon, and subject to, agreement upon an acceptable framework; the availability of sufficient data; capital expenditures associated with additional data needs; and related items. 4. The Commission approved the Settlement by Final Order No. 36624, dated May 30, 2025. 5. As of the date of this Application filing, the Parties have held two semi-annual workshops, in which the Parties discussed various load study items, as outlined above. The Parties continue to collaborate on developing the load study framework consistent with the Settlement. 6. To fulfill this commitment, Veolia has expended significant internal time and resources. Additionally, to ensure necessary resources, appropriate subject matter expertise, and analytical rigor, the Company has retained an outside consultant to provide specialized guidance and inform ongoing discussions regarding the framework and perform the load study in whatever form is ultimately required. To date,the Company has incurred$22,355 in outside consulting costs APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 7 to successfully meet the terms and spirit of the settlement. The Company anticipates additional costs will be associated with subsequent workshops as the framework continues to be developed through the collaborative process, as well as with the load study itself The ultimate scope and cost of the load study will depend on the framework agreed upon by the Parties and any additional analysis or data requirements identified through that process. None of these costs were included in the revenue requirement established in the Company's most recent general rate case. 7. To ensure these costs are appropriately tracked and preserved for future ratemaking consideration,Veolia respectfully requests an accounting order authorizing the Company to record these specific load study costs in a deferred account, rather than expensing them as incurred. II.REQUEST FOR ACCOUNTING ORDER 8. Veolia requests an accounting order authorizing the Company to establish a regulatory asset (deferred account) to record the incremental costs associated with development of the load study framework and completion of the comprehensive load study required under the Commission-approved Settlement in Case No. VEO-W-24-01. 9. The Company intends to utilize this deferred account to capture all relevant costs associated with the development and completion of the load study. Such costs are expected to include, but are not limited to, consultant costs associated with participation in the semi-annual workshops, development of the load study framework, performance of the load study, and other related activities necessary to comply with the Settlement requirements. 10. The costs associated with the semi-annual workshops, load study framework development, and load study itself were not known, and therefore,were not reflected in the revenue requirement established in the Company's most recent general rate case. These costs arise directly APPLICATION PAGE 3 OF 7 from implementation of the Commission-approved Settlement and are being incurred subsequent to the test year used to establish current rates. 11. The load study is expected to provide benefits extending beyond the period in which the costs are incurred by supporting future cost-of-service analyses and rate development. Accordingly, recording these costs as a regulatory asset more appropriately matches the costs with the future periods in which the benefits of the study will be realized. 12. Veolia does not request a determination that the deferred costs are recoverable in rates. Rather, the Company requests only authority to defer and separately track these costs. Any future request for recovery, including the amount, prudence, and appropriate amortization, would be subject to Commission review and approval in a future base rate case proceeding. 13. The requested accounting order will not affect current customer rates. Authorization to defer these costs is solely an accounting mechanism to preserve the costs for potential future consideration and will not result in recovery from customers absent a subsequent Commission order. 14. The costs of the load study are extraordinary, non-recurring, and to some extent, outside of Veolia's control because the load study framework is still being developed. 15. The costs associated with the framework and load study are mandated by the Commission-approved Settlement. 16. Granting the requested accounting order serves the public interest by facilitating completion of the comprehensive load study contemplated by the Settlement. The resulting study will assist the Commission, Staff, and interested parties in evaluating future cost allocation and rate design issues using improved data and analytical support, thereby promoting fair, transparent, and cost-based rates. APPLICATION PAGE 4 OF 7 17. This accounting treatment will ensure that these non-recurring costs are appropriately identified and tracked pending future ratemaking review,rather than being recognized entirely in the period incurred despite providing benefits extending into future rate making proceedings. 18. Upon authorization, Veolia will track these incremental costs separate from operating expenses, maintaining detailed records to support any future request for recovery in a subsequent general rate case. 19. The requested accounting treatment is consistent with sound regulatory accounting principles because it preserves for future review the incremental costs incurred to satisfy obligations established through the Commission-approved Settlement while maintaining the Commission's full authority to determine the appropriate ratemaking treatment of those costs in a subsequent proceeding. III.MODIFIED PROCEDURE 20. Veolia believes that a hearing is not necessary to consider the issues presented herein and respectfully requests that this Application be processed under Modified Procedure, i.e., by written submissions rather than by hearing, pursuant to IDAPA 31.01.01.201 et seq. If, however, the Commission determines that a technical hearing is required, the Company stands ready to support the Application. IV.CONCLUSION 21. For the reasons set forth above, Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. respectfully requests that the Commission issue an order: a. Scheduling this case to be processed by modified procedure; APPLICATION PAGE 5 OF 7 b. Authorizing the Company to establish a deferred account to track the incremental costs associated with the required load study; and C. Any other relief it deems appropriate or necessary. Dated: July 31, 2026 GIVENS PURSLEY LLP By Is/Preston N. Carter Preston N. Carter Givens Pursley LLP Attorneys for Veolia Water Idaho, Inc. APPLICATION PAGE 6 OF 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 31, 2026, I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document to the person(s) listed below by the method indicated: Commission Staff Via Electronic Mail Monica Barrios-Sanchez, Commission Secretary secretary@puc.idaho.gov Idaho Public Utilities Commission monica.barriossanchez@puc.idaho.gov 11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Bldg. 8, Suite 201-A Boise, ID 83714 Preston N. Carter Preston N. Carter APPLICATION PAGE 7 OF 7