Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20260723Comments_7.pdf From:Jennifer Lashinsky<kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2026 4:57 PM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, Jennifer Lashinsky 505 West Broad Street,Apt 621 Boise, ID 83702 jenn.lashinsky@gmail.com (631) 873-8503 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 From: Scott Runkel<kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2026 5:05 PM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, Idahoans are unified in their desire to be powered by clean energy.We value clean air and solar, wind, geothermal combined with batteries are reliable, cheap, and keep us from being at the mercy of volatile fossil fuel prices. Please keep your 2045 pledge for 100% clean energy. Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, Scott Runkel 1610 Northridge Drive Haney, ID 83333 runkel161065bgmail.com (208) 721-1737 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 From: David Whitacre <kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2026 8:50 PM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, I am categorically opposed to increasing energy demands anywhere in the developed world. AND, all new energy supply projects MUST be independent of any fossil fuel use-- they must be fully solar and/or wind powered. Thus, I absolutely oppose Idaho Power's proposal to build any new gas-burning power plants. Please,just forget about the whole idea! Sincerely, David Whitacre, Boise Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, David Whitacre 5567 W. Clearview Ct. Boise, ID 83703 davewhitacre@gmail.com (208) 608-3373 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 From:Jody Mahnken <kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2026 9:43 PM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, With all the sunshine in Idaho, Let us use SOLAR instead! Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, Jody Mahnken 4140 Oxbow Way Boise, ID 83713 mahnkenj13@yahoo.com (208) 672-9284 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 From: Doris Autenrieth <kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2026 9:49 PM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, don't bow to pressure from possible data centers to go to gas power plants. You have been so responsible to nature and what is best here in Idaho. Please don't abandon that posture! I really have been proud of Idaho Power's good policies for providing energy in a clean and responsible way. Do NOT CHANGE Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, Doris Autenrieth 4724 Mountlake St Chubbuck, ID 83202 daut126@aol.com (208) 251-5065 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 From:will Dashiell<kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 22, 2026 9:50 PM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, With other clean energy options, please don't go 'back in time' to technology that is unnecessary. Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, will Dashiell 526 reid COEUR D ALENE, ID 83814 powd a rgee k@gm a i l.co m (509) 879-6659 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 From: LaVelle Gardner<kwautomail@phone2action.com> Sent:Thursday, July 23, 2026 10:56 AM To: secretary<secretary@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: IPC-E-26-04 Gas Plants Public Comment Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission, When we are already battling with severely poor air quality, please reject this request and stand up for the people of Idaho. Please reject Idaho Power's request to construct two new gas plants in southern Idaho. These gas plants are expensive and risky, with fluctuating and increasing fuel costs into the future, and are simply not in the public interest. It is not certain that Idaho Power needs to build these plants as they rely on an uncertain forecast of energy demands in 2030. It is unclear Idaho Power can actually operate these gas plants because the pipelines are full and building new lines is outside of the Company's power to control the timeline or costs. Battery storage is more affordable, keeps energy dollars in-state instead of importing gas supplies, is quick to install, and does not pollute our air. Please put the onus on Big Tech to build their own expensive energy facilities, and tell Idaho Power to focus on building affordable, clean, and stable energy projects that don't pollute our air and raise our bills. Sincerely, LaVelle Gardner 44 Ord Blvd Nampa, ID 83651 lavellesgardner@gmail.com (208) 869-0231 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more information, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7