Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20251215Petition for Intervenor Funding.pdf RECEIVED December 15, 2025 IDAHO PUBLIC Kelsey Jae (ISB No. 7899) UTILITIES COMMISSION Kelsey Jae LLC 521 E. 41st St. Garden City, Idaho 83714 (208) 391-2961 kelsey@kelseyjae.com Attorney for Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ) APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER ) COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO ) CASE NO. IPC-E-25-16 INCREASE ITS RATES AND ) CHARGES FOR ELECTRIC ) CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES SERVICE IN THE STATE OF IDAHO ) FOR IDAHO'S PETITION FOR AND AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT ) INTERVENOR FUNDING CERTAIN MEASURES TO ) MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF ) REGULATORY LAG COMES NOW Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho ("CEO"), by and through its attorney of record, Kelsey Jae of the firm Kelsey Jae LLC, pursuant to Idaho Code § 61-617A and IDAPA 31.01.01.161-165 with the following request for intervenor funding. CEO is an intervenor in this case pursuant to Order No. 36557. This request is timely under Rule 164 because this request is filed within the deadline set by the Public Utilities Commission ("PUC" or "Commission"). I. Applicability of Idaho Code § 61-617A and IDAPA Rule 31.01.01.161 Idaho Power Company("Idaho Power" or the "Company") is a regulated public utility that has gross Idaho intrastate annual revenues exceeding $3,500,000.00. IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 1 II. IDAPA Rule 31.01 .01.162 requirements A. Itemized list of expenses Idaho Code provides that the Commission may award "legal fees, witness fees, and reproduction costs"to intervenors in a proceeding. Idaho Code § 61-617A. The attached Exhibit A is an itemized list of legal fees incurred by CEO's legal counsel assisting CEO with investigating and responding to Idaho Power's Application; analyzing and conducting discovery; preparing analyses, presentations, and proposals for review by other parties; meaningfully participating in several meetings, negotiation sessions, and hearings; supporting the development of the settlement stipulation; and filing of testimony. CEO focused its participation and input on facts and issues that are directly relevant to this docket. B. Statement of proposed findings CEO signed the Settlement Agreement and requests that it be approved in its entirety. Compromises were made during the process of negotiating a settlement agreement, as is the nature of the process. CEO's support for the settlement was premised, in part, upon the inclusion of the following: • Stipulation term 8c, which modified the time periods for Schedules 9 and 19 time-of-use ("TOU") rates to better align with a low-cost time window during day hours when solar supply is high relative to demand, and • Stipulation term 10, which calls for a Class Cost of Service ("CCOS") case to include study of an hourly informed class allocation of Production and Transmission revenue requirement. IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 2 CEO also asks the Commission to grant this request for intervenor funding. C. Statement showing costs CEO requests $2,974.80 in intervenor funding for attorney fees, as shown in Exhibit A. These fees were incurred reasonably and appropriately. This case covered complex and technical issues and required reviewing and responding to extensive analyses and/or proposals of the Company, Commission Staff, and other active parties and community members. To uncover and understand the facts, CEO reviewed multiple data sets; reviewed discovery requests and submitted its own discovery requests; and engaged in lengthy analytic efforts internally and with other parties. CEO and its legal counsel were active participants in all stages of the proceeding. For each of these efforts, CEO endeavored to be efficient with time and delegation of tasks. CEO maintained clear divisions of labor to reduce expenses. This request does not include hours invested by CEO officers, Michael Heckler and Courtney White. CEO requests an hourly rate for legal counsel of $222 per hour. For all these reasons, CEO's request for intervenor funding to pay the costs of the listed attorney is reasonable. D. Explanation of cost statement CEO is a nonprofit organization. In this proceeding, CEO represented its directors and supporters who are Idaho Power ratepayers. To provide consistent, professional, and impactful advocacy, CEO dedicates significant time to energy issues and specifically to policy making at the Commission. CEO has actively participated in prior proceedings on related matters. CEO does not have any financial interest in the outcome of this proceeding. The cost of this time and hiring legal counsel is a significant financial commitment and hardship for a nonprofit organization. Because contributions to CEO are inherently unstable and IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 3 sometimes insufficient, the availability of intervenor funding is essential for CEO to participate fully in these proceedings. CEO has no pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case; rather CEO dedicated its time and resources to represent the interests of its supporters. E. Statement of difference In general, CEO's contribution to this docket differs from PUC Staff's due to both CEO's leadership in presenting recommendations on matters that were not prioritized by PUC Staff and due to CEO's different position on certain matters. • Different priorities. In testimony supporting the IPC-E-25-16 settlement agreement, PUC Staff witness Louis describes - in the context of supporting the CCOS single issue case - that "trying to resolve CCOS in a general rate case is difficult due to the focus on developing, and supporting,the revenue requirement as a first priority."' CEO entered the docket with different priorities and took initiatives to ensure these matters were addressed: to improve on the Company's traditional CCOS methodology and to improve on the degree to which price signals can mitigate future costs. • Different positions. CEO's positions at times differ materially from those of PUC Staff. For example, PUC Staff's testimony stated a finding that the Company's CCOS study was valid and could be used to allocate the revenue requirement for the settlement.z CEO has consistently opposed the Company's sole reliance on its use of monthly observations 'Case No.IPC-E-25-16 Staff Witness Louis,M Direct Testimony(November 18, 2025), 5:9-11 (emphasis added). 2Case No.IPC-E-25-16 Staff Witness Louis,M Direct Testimony(November 18, 2025),4:16-24. The CCOS study was used as the basis to spread the revenue requirement increase. Staff performed an analysis showing that the costs included for recovery in this case are not driven by the need to provide service for these new large-load customers as detailed in Staff Witness Suess'Testimony.This analysis showed the validity of the CCOS study and that the results could be used to allocate the revenue requirement for the Settlement. IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING -4 to determine the fair allocation of bulk power system costs.' E.g., CEO's Final Comments filed in the 2023 General Rate case stated, "CEO believes that there shouldn't be another rate case filed by the Company that is not informed by a cost to serve analysis reflecting the costs to serve load in all hours of the test year.i4 Prior to this docket, the 2023 General Rate Case Settlement Agreement stipulated that CEO would lead workshops related to development of hourly informed rate design and hourly informed cost of service.5 CEO authored two follow-up reports: "Hourly Informed Rate Design" and "An Hourly Informed Bulk Power System COS Alternative." CEO was able to leverage findings from that process to lead the advocacy for certain improvements to price signals and to CCOS in this rate case.6 If CEO had not intervened and had not presented compelling evidence on these topics, it is unlikely that the settlement agreement would have included the stipulated modifications to TOU time windows (term 8c) or the stipulated review of an hourly informed CCOS methodology (term 10). F. Statement of recommendation CEO's recommendations focused on opportunities for price signals to improve long-term affordability for all customers, and on opportunities to improve on the accuracy and fairness of cost allocation methodologies. a For background, consider CEO's finding stated in its report IPC-E-23-11 Follow-up:An Hourly Informed Bulk Power System COS Alternative,distributed via email to IPC-E-23-11 parties,Dec 16, 2024: When compared to the traditional 12CP/4CP method,the magnitude of differences in class allocations that arise from use of an hourly informed cost of service method are substantial,challenging the appropriateness of continuing to solely rely on a 12CP/4CP method,as it was employed in Idaho Power's 2023 General Rate Case(GRC),in future general rate cases. 4 IPC-E-23-11,CEO Final Comments,p7. s IPC-E-23-11, Settlement Agreement, Stipulation 13,p11. s Note that CEO did not request or receive intervenor funding for the workshop related efforts. IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 5 G. Statement showing class of customer A component of CEO's mission is to bring problem-solving rigor and solution-focused approaches to better serve the long-term interests of Idahoans and future generations. CEO's engagement and testimony in this docket sought to serve the interests of customer classes which CEO refers to in testimony as "small customers." These customer classes include Small General Service (standard and on-site generators), Residential (standard, on-site generators, and Time of Day), Master Mobile Home Park, and Agricultural Irrigation. Based on the foregoing reasons, CEO respectfully requests that the Commission grant this Petition for Intervenor Funding in the amount of$2,974.80 as illustrated in Exhibit A. DATED this 15th day of December, 2025. Respectfully submitted, Kelsey Jae Attorney for CEO Exhibit A: Statement of Costs IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 6 Exhibit A: Statement of Costs For attorney fees incurred by Kelsey Jae LLC Analyzing Idaho Power's application and direct testimonies; 13.4 hours @ conducting relevant legal research; analyzing discovery requests and $222/hr responses of other parties; drafting CEO discovery; crafting response strategies, including comment/testimony/settlement strategies and filings; participating in settlement conferences Total 13.4 hours $2,974.80 IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 15th day of December, 2025. I delivered true and correct copies of the foregoing PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING to the following persons via the method of service noted: Electronic Mail Delivery (See Order No. 34602) Idaho Public Utilities Commission Monica Barrios-Sanchez Commission Secretary secretary0puc.idaho.gov Idaho PUC Staff f Chris Burdin Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission chris.burdin(@puc.idaho.gov Idaho Power Company Megan Goicoechea Allen Donovan Walker Connie Aschenbrenner Grant Anderson mgoicoecheaallenOidahopower.com dwalker@idahopower.com caschenbrennerna idahopower.com gandersonOidahopower.com dockets idahopower.com City of Boise Ed Jewell Katie O'Neil BoiseCityAttorneyOcityofboise.org ej ewellOcityof boise.org koneilOcityofboise.org Federal Executive Agencies Emily W. Medlyn Jelani A. Freeman Dwight Etheridge emily.med yn@hq.doe.gov j elani.freemanOhq.doe.gov detheridgeCa)exeterassociates.com IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 8 Gannon, et. al. John Gannon Randy Morris Deborah Fease Amy Lorrance j ohngannon200 P gmail.com occidentalpacific(a)hotmail.com feased854(a)gmail.com Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc. Eric L. Olsen Lance Kaufman, Ph.D. elo(a)echohawk.com lance(a)aegisinsi ht.com Industrial Customers of Idaho Power Peter J. Richardson peterna richardsonadams.com Kroger Kurt J. Boehm Jody Keyle Cohn kboehm(a)bkllawfirm.com i kylercohn(a)bkllawfirm.com Micron Technology, Inc. Austin Rueschhoff Thorvald A. Nelson Austin W. Jensen Kristine A.K. Roach darueschhoff(a)hollandhart.com tnelson(a)hollandhart.com awi ensen@hollandhart.com karoach(a)hollandhart.com aclee(a)hollandhart.com tlfriel@hollandhart.com Northwest Energy Coalition Ben Otto Lauren McCloy Derek Goldman ben(a)nwenerg y�org laurenOnwenerg y�org derek@nwenerg y�org IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 9 Kelsey Jae Attorney for CEO IPC-E-25-16 - CLEAN ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDAHO - PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING - 10