20141126AVU to Staff 11.pdf

Avista Corp.
1411 East Mission P.O. Box3727
Spokane. Washington 99220-0500
Telephone 509-489-o5oo R i C i: !\ ' ;:' r'
TollFree 800-727-9170
#rrrtsrfr
Corp.
November 25,2014
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472W. Washington St.
Boise,ID 83720-0074
Attn: Neil Price
Deputy Attorney General
?0lr+ HOV 25 AH 10, 58
.iin;i^; I:..Ii] li-l l-l [$, (iltl'i Li 1 1;;]il,r;'
Re: Production Request of the Commission Staffin Case Nos. AVU-E-14-07/AVU-G-14-02
Dear Mr. Price,
Enclosed are an original and three copies of Avista's responses to IPUC Staffs production
requests in the above referenced dockets. Included in this mailing is Avista's response to
production request 11. The electronic versions of the responses were emailed on tll25ll4.
If there are any questions regarding the enclosed information, please contact Paul Kimball at
[phone] or via e-mail at [e-mail]
Sincerelv-
,/t ./4-
Paul Kimball
Regulatory Analyst
Enclosures
CC: all parties
AVISTA CORP.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION:
CASE NO:
REQUESTER:
TYPE:
REQUEST NO.:
IDAHO
AVU-E-14-07
AVU-G-14-02
PUC Staff
Production Request
Staff - 11
DATE PREPARED: ll I 19 12014WITNESS: Chris Drake
RESPONDER: Renee CoelhoDEPT: DSM
TELEPHONE: (s09) 49s-8607EMAIL: [e-mail]
REQUEST:
For calendar years 2012 and 2013, please provide; (a) the total number of Idaho homes
weatherized; (b) the average cost per Idaho home weatherized with CAP administrative fees
included, (c) the average cost per Idaho home weatherized without CAP administrative fees
included; (d) the administrative fees paid to CAP for the weatherization of Idaho homes; and (e)
total dollar amount paid to CAP for weatherization of Idaho homes.
RESPONSE:
a). Total Idaho Homes Weatherized
2012
2013
161
100
b).
c).
d).
e).
Administrative fees paid
Total dollar amount paid for weatherization
Average Cost per Idaho home w/ Admin
2012 $4,347.72
2013 $7,000.00
Average Cost per Idaho home w/o Admin
2012
2013
$3,780.62
$6,086.96
$91,302.13
$91,304.36
$699,982.64
$700,000.00
2012
2013
2012
2013
20t2
o ARRA funding was still available. This allowed the agencies to:
o Have additional staff to do more homes
o Include multiple funding sources in one home
Page I of2
o Natural gas homes were eligible
20t3o fiftfu4 funding was no longer availableo Increase in costs (both labor and materials)o No natural gas funding; more Avista dollars spent in the eligible (electric) homes
Page2 of2