20251002Reply Comments.pdf

RECEIVED
October 02, 2025
T. Hethe Clark, ISB No. 7265 IDAHO PUBLIC
Clark Wardle LLP UTILITIES COMMISSION
251 E. Front Street, Suite 310
Boise, ID 83702
P.O. Box 639
Boise, ID 83701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 208/388-1001
[e-mail]
#23917.3
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF Case No. GNR-E-25-03
INTERMOUNTAIN PACIFIC, LLC AN
IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS
FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM RULE 102 OF OF THE COMMISSION STAFF
THE COMMISSION'S MASTER
METERING RULES FOR ELECTRIC
UTILITIES.
INTERMOUNTAIN PACIFIC, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company (the
"Applicant") hereby replies to the Comments of the Commission Staff(the "Staff Comments")
filed in this matter in accordance with the timeline required in the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission(the "Commission")Notice of Modified Procedure.
BACKGROUND
As noted in the original Request for Exemption or Waiver from Master-Metering and
Individual Metering in Multi-Occupant Residential Buildings (the "Exemption Request"), the
Applicant is developing a senior living project(the"Project")on property located on Linder Road,
just north of US 20/26 (the"Property"). The Project is to provide independent living and assisted
living services with a goal of making living arrangements as simple as possible by providing a
single bill for all of the residents' needs—including food, rent, activities, and utilities.
APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF—PAGE 1
4902-1905-4189,v.2

Rule 101 of the Master-Metering Rules for Electric Utilities(Idaho Rule of Administrative
Procedure 31.26.01.101) ("Rule 101")presents a challenge for this model as it would require 100
meters and 100 power bills, when all such bills would be paid by the owner of the Project. The
residents' electrical consumption will be largely consistent and there is no reason to differentiate
among those residents. In addition, as further detailed in the Exemption Request (and as
emphasized in prior decisions of the Commission granting very similar exemptions from Rule
101), energy-saving elements have been incorporated into the Project. In addition, the Applicant
is willing to adhere to conditions of approval that are consistent with those imposed by the
Commission in connection with previously granted exemptions to Rule 101, including, without
limitation, Order No. 23936 (Case No. IPC-E-91-21), Order No. 26451 (Case No. IPC-E-96-7),
and Order No. 26512 (Case No. WWP-E-96-5). Each of these decisions are discussed below in
greater detail.
REPLY TO STAFF COMMENTS
To the Applicant's knowledge, the Staff Comments are the only written comments
submitted to the Commission in response to the Exemption Request. The Staff Comments
recommend denial because "Rule 101 prohibits master-metering when these systems are not
centrally controlled." In other words, it would seem that the Staff Comments recommend denial
simply because the request would be contrary to Rule 101. Of course, that is the purpose of the
Exemption Request — the Applicant would not have submitted the Exemption Request if the
proposal were consistent with Rule 101. We believe the Staff Comments omit the correct analysis.
Instead of focusing on whether the proposal is consistent with Rule 101, the Staff Comments
should have considered whether a waiver from Rule 101 is appropriate and whether the
Commission has granted such exemptions in the past.
APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF-PAGE 2
4902-1905-4189,v.2

Review of prior Commission action shows that a waiver in this case is not only appropriate
but is also consistent with prior Commission treatment of Rule 101. In fact, the Applicant's
research revealed three prior orders of the Commission under very similar circumstances that
should have been considered in the Staff Comments.
In October 1991, the Commission issued Order No. 23936, which considered what was
then referred to as Rule 9.21:
9.2 Master-Metering and Individual Metering in Multi-
Occupant Residential Buildings.
No multi-occupant residential buildings shall be master-metered
after July 1, 1980, if the dwelling units for non-transient tenants
contain an electric space heating, water heating or air-
conditioning unit that is not centrally controlled and for which
the dwelling unit's tenants individually control electric usage.
The request was an application by RiverPlace Senior Living Community, located in Boise, which
was "designed for people who require some level of assistance for day-to-day living, but do not
require institutional medical care like that found in nursing homes." Order 23936, at 1. In that
case, Staff noted that "utility costs will be covered in the fees paid by residents," and that the
"facility is energy-efficient"; accordingly, Staff recommended that the waiver be granted with
conditions. Id. at 2. These included a limit on the exemption to apply only so long as the facility
was used for assisted-living, and that the facility met energy-efficient design specifications. The
Commission agreed and so ordered.
'Rule 9.2 is substantially similar to the present Rule 101,which(for convenience)is included below:
101.MASTER METERING AND INDIVIDUAL METERING IN MULTIOCCUPANT RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS(Rule 101).
Non-transient tenants living in multi-occupant residential buildings connected for electric service after July 1, 1980,
containing an electric space heating,water heating,or air-conditioning(space cooling)unit that is not centrally
controlled and for which the dwelling unit's tenants individually control electric usage will be individually metered
and billed by the electric utility.
APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF—PAGE 3
4902-1905-4189,v.2

Five years later, in October 1996, the Commission considered what was essentially a
continuation of Order No. 23936. In this case (Order No. 26451), the Commission considered
what was then referred to as Rule 102,which contains substantially the same language as Rule 9.2
and now-Rule 101. In this follow-up case,the applicant proposed a two-story facility that allowed
the residents to live in a"simple,worry-free environment. Included in the standard rental package
are meals, housekeeper, maintenance and all utilities (except telephone)." Order 26451, at 1.
Because "energy conservation measures" were incorporated in the design and because "both
design and operation does not lend itself well to providing the conservation signals that would
otherwise be provided through individual metering and billing" (id. at 2), the Commission found
it reasonable to issue the waiver with the same conditions to which Order No. 26451 was subject.
That same year, the Commission granted another waiver of what was then referred to as
Rule 102. In that case, "an institutional and assisted-living facility" in Orofino, Idaho requested
the same waiver because the occupants,who were retired seniors, "will have made the choice that
they no longer want the responsibilities for maintaining a home or apartment...." Order 26512, at
1. As a result, "[i]ncluded in [the company's] standard rental package are meals, housekeeping,
maintenance and all utilities (except telephone)."Id.2 In summary, the applicant argued, "... that
master-metering should not be required in a project of this nature, where utility costs will be
covered in the fees paid by residents, and where the facility is designed to be energy efficient."Id.
Noting these factors and its prior decisions, the Commission granted the waiver.
While we appreciate Staff, its role, and the public service it provides, we believe the Staff
Comments are problematic in that they do not acknowledge prior waivers of this rule provided by
the Commission in nearly identical circumstances. This Exemption Request is substantially the
2 Note that this language is identical to Order 23936.
APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF—PAGE 4
4902-1905-4189,v.2

same as the three cited orders that were approved by the Commission. Each reviewed an identical
master-metering rule. The level of assistance provided to the Project's residents is the same. The
billing structure is the same. The effort to provide energy efficient construction is the same. There
is no apparent reason for this request to be treated differently than three prior applications that
went before the Commission.
The Staff Comments should have considered these prior orders,rather than concluding that
the request should be denied simply because Rule 101 provides otherwise. The Commission has
authority to grant a waiver and has done so multiple times in the pas. This is an appropriate
opportunity to do so once again.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, the Applicant respectfully requests that the Exemption
Request be granted consistent with the Commission's prior actions in Order Nos. 23 93 6, 26451,
and 26512. The Applicant is more than willing to impose conditions consistent with these prior
orders and decisions of the Commission.
DATED this 2nd day of October 2025.
CLARK WARDLE LLP
T. Hethe Clark, ISB No. 7265
Attorneys for Intermountain Pacific, LLC
APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF-PAGE 5
4902-1905-4189,v.2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 SERVED
THE FOREGOING APPLICANT'S REPLAY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION
STAFF IN CASE NO. GNR-E-25-03 BY EMAILING A COPY THEREOF TO THE
FOLLOWING:
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
11331 W. Chinden Blvd., Building 8, Suite 201-A
PO Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
secretarygpuc.idaho.gov
Patricia.j ordankpuc.idaho.gov
erika.melansong]2uc.idaho.gov
j on.kruck(kpuc.idaho.gov
APPLICANT'S REPLY TO COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF—PAGE 6
4902-1905-4189,v.2

Secrets-r
4.96 66 Date
OCT 9- 1991
BEFORE TE E IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF )
CROSSINGS CORPORATION FOR AN ) CASE NO. IPC-E-91-21
EXEMPTION FOR THE RIVERPLACE )
SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY FROM ) ORDER NO. 23936
GAS, ELECTRIC AND WATER CUSTOMER )
RELATIONS RULE 9.2, IDAPA 31.C.9.2. )
On September 23, 1991, Mr. Dennis L. Rattie, Director of Development
for Crossings Corporation, directed a letter to this Commission requesting an
exemption from Rule 9.2 of this Commission's Rules and Regulations Governing
Customer Relations of Gas, Electric and Water Public Utilities Under the
Jurisdiction of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, IDAPA 31.C.9.2. Rule 9.2
provides:
9.2 Master-Metering and Individual Metering in Multi-
Occupant Residential Buildings.
No multi-occupant residential buildings shall be master-metered
after July 1, 1980, if the dwelling units for non-transient tenants
contain an electric space heating, water heating or air-
conditioning unit that is not centrally controlled and for which
the dwelling unit's tenants individually control electric usage.
The information that Mr. Rattie submitted to the Commission Staff explained that
Crossings Corporation is developing RiverPlace Senior Living Community, an
assisted-living facility near Park Center in Boise. RiverPlace is designed for people
who require some level of assistance for day-to-day living, but do not require
institutional medical care like that found in nursing homes. Residents will have
private living quarters, but will eat meals in a communal dining facility. Water
heating is centrally-controlled. Individual living units will feature electric space
heating and space cooling under control of the residents.
Mr. Rattie has requested an exemption from Customer Relations Rule
9.2. Beverly Barker, Director of the Commission's Consumer Assistance Staff,
reviewed the materials that Mr. Rattie submitted and recommended that his
request for an exemption be granted. Her decision memorandum stated:
In my opinion, the two most persuasive arguments in favor of
granting an exemption that were presented by Mr. Rattie are:
ORDER NO. 23936 -1-

(1) utility costs will be covered in the fees paid by residents, and
(2) the facility is energy-efficient. The primary reason that
master-metering was prohibited was to encourage conservation
by providing direct signals (through individual metering and
billing) to consumers regarding their use. Mr. Rattie has
indicated that even if the individual units are individually-
metered, RiverPlace will pay the bills, which will prevent the
consumers/occupants from receiving feedback on their energy
consumption. Since RiverPlace itself will be paying the bills, it
has the incentive to construct the buildings so as to minimize
energy use. I have asked [Staff Economist] Bill Eastlake to
review the material submitted with respect to design features.
Bruce Pyeatt of Idaho Power indicated that the Company has no
objections to the Commission granting a request for an
exemption.
Staff Recommendation:
I recommend that this exemption be granted with two condi-
tions. The Commission should make it clear that the exemp-
tions apply to this facility only so long as it is used for
assisted living or similar institutional-type caregiving, and that
conversion to other uses may require individual metering. The
other condition we should impose is that the facility must meet
the energy-efficient design specifications mentioned in the
request for exemption or some other criteria specified by the
Commission Staff.
We reviewed this decision memorandum at our decision meeting of
September 30, 1991. At that meeting we accepted the Staffs recommendation and
elaborated on the Staffs second condition by requiring the building to meet the
energy-efficient design specifications contained in Idaho Power Company's Design
Excellence Award Program (DEAF).
We have since been notified by Idaho Power Company that the plans for
RiverPlace Senior Living Community meet the design specifications of the DEAP
program. Accordingly, we grant the exemption.
O R D E R
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Crossings Corporation's request for
an exemption for the RiverPlace Senior Living Community, located near Park
Center, Boise, from Gas, Electric and Water Customer Relations Rule 9.2's
prohibition against master-metering be granted subject to the following conditions:
(a) The exemption from the prohibition from master-metering applies
only so long as the facility initially known as the RiverPlace Senior
ORDER NO. 23936 -2-

Living Community is used for assisted-living or similar institutional-type
caregiving;
(b) The facility is constructed to meet the energy-efficient design
specifications of Idaho Power Company's Design Excellence Award
Program (DEAP); and
(c) The terms of this exemption are recorded at the Ada County
Recorders office in a manner that would put any prospective purchaser of
the facility on notice of the terms of this exemption.
THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in
issues finally decided by this Order) in Case No. IPC-E-91-21 may petition for
reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with
regard to any matter decided in this Order. Within seven (7) days after any person
has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for
reconsideration. See Idaho Code § 61-626.
DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho,
this 94'(- day of October 1991.
ES JAI R, PRESIDENT
RALPH TqELSON, COMMISSIONER
Z�l
MARSHA H. SMITH, CO 1VIISSI NER
ATTEST:
MYW4A J. ALTERS, SECRETARY
MG:vld/0-1583
ORDER NO. 23936 -3-

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF CROSSINGS..., 1996 WL 34719906...
1996 WL 34719906(Idaho P.U.C.)
IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF CROSSINGS CORPORATION FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM
RULE 102 OF THE COMMISSION'S MASTER-METERING RULES FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES.
Case No.IPC-E-96-7
Order No.26451
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
May 1996
RALPH NELSON,PRESIDENTMARSHA H. SMITH,COMMISSIONERDENNIS S.HANSEN,COMMISSIONER
*1 On April 17, 1996, Mr. Dennis L. Rattie, Director of Development for Crossings Corporation (Crossings; Company),
directed a letter to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (Commission) requesting an exemption from Rule 102 of this
Commission's Master-Metering Rules for Electric Utilities.Reference IDAPA 31.26.01.102.Rule 102 provides:
102.MASTER-METERING AND INDIVIDUAL METERING IN MULTI-OCCUPANT RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
(Rule 102).
No multi-occupant residential buildings shall be master-metered after July 1,1990,if the dwelling units for non-transient tenants
contain an electric space heating,water heating,or air conditioning(space cooling)unit that is not centrally controlled and for
which the dwelling unit's tenants individually control electric usage.
Crossings has plans to initiate a second phase in its senior resident retirement center(River Place Senior Living Community)
along Park Center Boulevard in Boise. It will feature a 58-unit congregate living building as well as 20 cottage units along
Logger's Creek. Crossings requests an exemption from the individual metering standards which would otherwise be applied
to the congregate living building. A similar exemption was granted in 1991 for the first phase of the project. Reference
Commission Order No. 23936, Case No. IPC-E-91-21. Crossings agrees that the proposed cottages maintain the relevant
residential characteristics that would require independent metering.
Crossings maintains that the congregate structure should not be viewed as a residential project, only an institutional structure
that presents residential characteristics. The congregate structure will be a two-story facility featuring extensive life safety
measures to allow its residents to live an independent lifestyle in a controlled environment. The general operating philosophy
of Crossings is to provide as many amenities and services that will allow its residents to live in a more simple, worry-free
environment.Included in the standard rental package are meals,housekeeper,maintenance and all utilities(except telephone).
Crossings contends that master metering should not be required in a project of this nature,where utility costs will be covered
in the fees paid by residents,and where the facility is designed to be energy efficient.
As reflected in Order No. 23936"the primary reason that master-metering was prohibited was to encourage conservation by
providing direct signals(through individual metering and billing)to consumers regarding their use."Crossings contends that
because of facility design and operation,no economic or energy advantages would be realized through individual metering.
Crossings reports that the following energy conservation measures will be provided in construction:
*2 -2"x 6"exterior walls with R-19 batt insulation.
•Roof structures comprised of wood trusses with R-38 insulation.
•High efficiency vinyl framed windows with 1"insulated glass units.
•High efficiency composite doors with insulated cores.
WESTLAW ©2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF CROSSINGS..., 1996 WL 34719906...
•General use of florescent rather than incandescent bulbs.
Also, described by Crossings is the facility layout and energy using equipment. Full architectural renderings accompany the
filing.
On May 2, 1996,Idaho Power filed a letter with the Commission indicating its recommendation that the request of Crossings for
exemption be granted consistent and on the same terms as those established in Order No.23936.In its Order,the Commission
granted an exemption subject to the following three conditions:
a.The exemption from the prohibition of master-metering applies only so long as the facility initially known as the RiverPlace
Senior Living Community is used for assisted living or similar institutional type care-giving;
b. The facility is constructed to meet the energy efficient design specifications of Idaho Power Company's Design Excellence
Award Program(DEAP);and
c. The terms of this exemption are recorded at the Ada County Recorder's office in a manner that would put any prospective
purchaser of the facility on notice of the terms of the exemption.
COMMISSION FINDINGS
The Commission has reviewed the filings of record in Case No. IPC-E-96-7 and its prior Order No. 23936 in Case No. IPC-
E-91-21.We find that Crossings proposes to incorporate significant energy conservation measures in its Phase II construction
plans.We find that the nature of the proposed congregate living structure described above in both design and operation does not
lend itself well to providing the conservation signals that would otherwise be provided through individual metering and billing.
We therefore find it reasonable to authorize the requested exemption from Rule 102 of the Commission's Master-Metering Rules
for Electric Utilities,subject to the same three conditions approved in prior Order No.23936 and set forth above.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Commission has jurisdiction in Case No.IPC-E-96-7 and the issues presented pursuant to the authority and power granted
it under Title 61 of the Idaho Code;the Commission's Rules of Procedure,IDAPA 31.01.01.000, and the Commission's Master
Metering Rules for Electric Utilities,IDAPA 31.26.01.000 et. seq.
ORDER
*3 In consideration of the foregoing and as more particularly described above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Crossings
Corporation's request for an exemption from Rule 102 of the Commission's Master-Metering Rules for Electric Utilities
(Reference IDAPA 31.26.01.102)is granted for the congregate living structure portion of its second phase River Place Senior
Living Community development project along Park Center Boulevard in Boise,subject to the three conditions set forth above.
THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one(21)days
of the service date of this Order. Within seven(7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person
may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code§ 61-626.
DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho this day of May 1996.
RALPH NELSON,PRESIDENT
WESTLAW ©2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF CROSSINGS..., 1996 WL 34719906...
MARSHA H. SMITH,COMMISSIONER
DENNIS S.HANSEN,COMMISSIONER
ATTEST:
Myrna J.Walters
Commission Secretary
End of Document ©2024 Thomson Reuters.No claim to original U.S.Government Works.
WESTLAW ©2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 3

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF OROFINO..., 1996 WL 34719925...
1996 WL 34719925 (Idaho P.U.C.)
IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF OROFINO RETIREMENT PROPERTIES,INC.FOR AN EXEMPTION
FROM RULE 102 OF THE COMMISSION'S MASTER-METERING RULES FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES
Case No.WWP-E-96-5
Order No.26512
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
July 1996
RALPH NELSON,PRESIDENTMARSHA H. SMITH,COMMISSIONERDENNIS S.HANSEN,COMMISSIONER
*1 On June 12, 1996,Mr. Steven J. Crockett,Vice President of Orofino Retirement Properties,Inc. (the Company) directed
a letter to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission(Commission)requesting an exemption from Rule 102 of this Commission's
Master-Metering Rules for Electric Utilities.Reference IDAPA 31.26.01.102.Rule 102 provides:
102.Master-Metering and Individual Metering in Multi-Occupant Residential Buildings(Rule 102).
No multi-occupant residential buildings shall be master-metered after July 1, 1990, if the dwelling for non-transient tenants
contain an electric space heating,water heating,or air conditioning(space cooling)unit that is not centrally controlled and for
which the dwelling unit's tenants individually control electric usage.
The Company has designed and plans to develop and construct the Brookside Landing Retirement & Health Care Facility
(Brookside)in Orofino,Idaho.Brookside is designed to be an institutional and assisted-living facility,that presents residential
characteristics. The two-story facility will be comprised of 12 residential care unit rooms and 28 apartment styled units.
The occupants, retired seniors, the Company states, will have made the choice that they no longer want the responsibilities
for maintaining a home or apartment and want to have the assistance provided that can simplify and make their lives more
secure.Included in their standard rental package are meals,housekeeping,maintenance and all utilities(except telephone).The
Company requests an exemption from the individual metering standards which would otherwise by applied to the congregate
living building. The Company contends that master-metering should not be required in a project of this nature,where utility
costs will be covered in the fees paid by residents,and where the facility is designed to be energy efficient.
Brookside provides features for extensive life safety measures to allow the occupant to live an independent life style in a
controlled environment.Energy conservation measures to be incorporated in the project include:
2"ridged Styrofoam perimeter insulation around the foundation below the floor.
2"x 6"exterior walls with R-19 batt insulation.
The roof structure is comprised of wood trusses with R-38 fiberglass foil-reinforced vapor barrier.
Doors are to be high-efficiency insulated and any glazing to be insulated solar bronze glass.
Windows to be high-efficiency vinyl framed with insulated low"E"argon gas glass.
Fluorescent lighting typical throughout instead of incandescent bulbs.
Natural gas not being available in this area the water heaters are to be U-L.approved,electric,glass-lined and have thermostatic
step control and two magnesium anode rods. Hot water recirculating pumps are to be installed in system and are to have built
in thermal overload protection.
WESTLAW ©2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF OROFINO..., 1996 WL 34719925...
*2 On June 17, 1996, The Washington Water Power Company filed a letter with the Commission recommending that the
request of Orofino Retirement Properties,Inc. for exemption for the Brookside project be approved.
COMMISSION FINDINGS
The Commission has reviewed the filings of record in Case No. WWP-E-96-5. The Commission has also reviewed its prior
Order Nos.23936(Case No.IPC-E-91-21)and 26451 (Case No.IPC-E-96-7)wherein the Commission granted an exemption
from Master-Metering Rules to Crossings Corporation for a similar assisted-living facility in Boise, Idaho. The Commission
notes that the Brookside facility will incorporate significant energy conservation measures in its construction. We find that
the nature of the proposed institutional and assisted living facility described above in both design and operation does not lend
itself well to providing the conservation signals that would otherwise be provided through individual metering and billing.We
therefore find it reasonable to authorize the requested exemption from Rule 102 of the Commission's Master-Metering Rules
for Electric Utilities,subject to the following conditions:
a)The exemption from the prohibition from master-metering applies only so long as the facility initially known as Brookside
Landing Retirement and Health Care Facility is used for assisted living or similar institutional type care-giving;
b)The facility as constructed incorporates the energy efficiency measures described above and meets or exceeds the Construction
Standards for Energy Conservation as set forth in Idaho Code,Title 44 Chapter 23;and
c)The terms of the exemption are recorded at the County Recorder's office in a manner that would put any prospective purchasers
of the facility on notice of the terms of the exemption.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Commission has jurisdiction in Case No.WWP-E-96-5 and the issues presented pursuant to the authority and power granted
it under Title 61 of the Idaho Code;the Commission's Rules of Procedure,IDAPA 31.01.01.000 et seq. ,and the Commission's
Master-Metering Rules for Electric Utilities,IDAPA 31.26.01.000 et seq.
ORDER
In consideration of the foregoing and as more particularly described above,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Orofino Retirement
Properties, Inc.'s requested exemption from Rule 102 of the Commission's Master-Metering Rules for Electric Utilities
(Reference IDAPA 31.26.01.102) is granted for the Brookside Landing Retirement and Health Care Facility development
project,an institutional and assisted-living facility to be located in Orofino,Idaho,subject to the three conditions set forth above.
*3 THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one(21)
days of the service date of this Order.Within seven(7)days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration,any other person
may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code§ 61-626.
DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho this day of July 1996.
RALPH NELSON,PRESIDENT
MARSHA H. SMITH,COMMISSIONER
DENNIS S.HANSEN,COMMISSIONER
WESTLAW ©2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2

IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST OF OROFINO..., 1996 WL 34719925...
ATTEST:
Myrna J.Walters
Commission Secretary
End of Document ©2024 Thomson Reuters.No claim to original U.S.Government Works.
WESTLAW ©2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 3