Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250805Decision Memo.pdf DECISION MEMORANDUM TO: COMMISSIONER LODGE COMMISSIONER HAMMOND COMMISSIONER HARDIE COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM: JEFFREY R. LOLL DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE: AUGUST 5, 2025 SUBJECT: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO UPDATE ITS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES APPLICABLE TO SCHEDULE 72, GENERATOR INTERCONNECTIONS TO PURPA QUALIFYING FACILITY SELLERS; CASE NO. IPC-E-25-22. On May 8,2025,Idaho Power Company("Company"),applied to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") requesting authority to update its operation and maintenance charges applicable to Schedule 72,generator interconnections to Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act ("PURPA") qualifying facility sellers effective January 1, 2026 ("Application"). The Company requests that the Application be processed under modified procedure. Application at 5. On June 9,2025,the Commission issued a Notice of Application and Notice of Intervention Deadline. Order No. 36631. The Commission granted intervention to Idaho Hydroelectric Power Producers Trust, an Idaho Trust, d/b/a IdaHydro ("IdaHydro") and the Renewable Energy Coalition("REC"). Order Nos. 36629 and 36668. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission now issue a Notice of Modified Procedure, establishing a September 2, 2025, initial comment deadline; a September 23, 2025, all-party reply comment deadline; and a September 30, 2025, Company reply comment deadline. IDAHYDRO'S REQUEST FOR HEARING Within its petition to intervene, IdaHydro objected to the Company's request for modified procedure. IdaHydro's Petition to Intervene at 2. The petition to intervene states in relevant part: DECISION MEMORANDUM 1 [IdaHydro] objects to use of the Modified Procedure in processing the pending Application and requests a full hearing process. This matter,as reflected by the pre- filing of testimony by the Applicant, is fact-specific and thus deserving of the development of a full record to assist the Commission in accurate resolution. Further, the magnitude of both the requested increase in the operation and maintenance charges proposed to be levied against the Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act of 1978 on the Applicant's Schedule 72 was, as explained in the Application, originally a rate case component, which necessitates a hearing pursuant to Commission rules. Id. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to: 1. Process the case through modified procedure and issue a Notice of Modified Procedure establishing a September 2, 2025, initial comment deadline; a September 23, 2025, all- parry reply comment deadline; and a September 30, 2025, Company reply comment deadline? 2. Establish a different procedural schedule to process the case? 3. Anything else? Jeffrey`R. toll Deputy Attorney General I\LegaI\ELECTRIC\IPC-E-25-22_Gen IC\rnemos\IPCE2522_dec2Jl.docx DECISION MEMORANDUM 2