Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20250707Reply Comments.pdf RECEIVED July 07, 2025 IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Preston N. Carter, ISB No. 8462 GIVENS PURSLEY LLP 601 West Bannock Street P.O. Box 2720 Boise, Idaho 83701-2720 (208) 388-1200 prestoncarter@givenspursley.com 18971071.4[13988.23] Attorneys for Gem State Water Company, LLC BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION Case No. GSW-W-24-01 OF GEM STATE WATER COMPANY, LLC. FOR THE AUTHORITY TO GEM STATE WATER COMPANY,LLC's INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES REPLY COMMENTS FOR WATER SERVICE IN THE STATE OF IDAHO Gem State Water Company, LLC (Gem State Water, Applicant, or Company) submits the following comments in reply to the comments filed by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff. GENERAL COMMENTS Gem State Water has worked diligently to continue improvements to its rural water systems in northern Idaho, and appreciates Staff s efforts throughout this case. Gem State Water does not object to the majority of Staffs proposed adjustments. Gem State Water does respectfully disagree with the proposed adjustments to salary expenses and certain parts of the depreciation expense adjustment. Gem State Water's position on reply is summarized in Exhibit 1, and revised proposed rates based on this position are attached as Exhibit 2. REPLY COMMENTS PAGE I OF 5 REPLY COMMENTS 1. Salaries The Company proposed a 10% salary increase for employees. In its comments, Staff proposed allowing a 5% increase based on Staff s conclusion that data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicated an average salary-growth rate of 5.59% for similar occupations between the years of 2022 to 2023 and 2021 to 2023. Staff Comments at 18. Staffs proposed adjustment would decrease salary expenses by $17,141. The Company does not agree with this adjustment for several reasons. First, employment at Gem State Water is uniquely challenging. Gem State Water consists of several rural water systems scattered throughout a large area, rather than a consolidated urban system. Most or all field service requires a significant drive. In many instances, it is not possible to access service points by vehicle, so a significant walk or hike is also necessary. Gem State Water's three field employees must cover this entire territory; one of them is on call nearly around-the-clock. In addition, Gem State Water's systems were not centrally planned, and documentation on their layout is often lacking. Employees often rely upon institutional knowledge regarding the system, as well as the best methods to access various parts of the systems. Gem State Water's managerial and office positions are also challenging. Its employees must issue around 1,000 bills per month and field customer calls and inquiries throughout its extensive service territory. Regulations, testing, and other regulatory requirements are extensive, as they must be completed for each of Gem State Water's systems rather than a single, unified system. And, due to Gem State Water's small staff, employees must cover for one another when one staff member is sick or out of the office. In short, employment at Gem State Water is significantly more taxing than the nationwide average position. REPLY COMMENTS PAGE 2 OF 5 Second,Northern Idaho has experienced significant growth in both population and cost of living. The cost of living in the Coeur d'Alene area, for example, is 26% higher than the national average. See Cost of Living Information for Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, Economic Research Institute, available at https://www.erieri.com/cost-of-living/united-states/idaho/coeur-dalene. Housing costs are particularly high, making it difficult to attract and retain quality employees. Third, wages for positions at competing utilities are better than Gem State Water's wages. Public-sector competitors, such as the City of Coeur d'Alene,provide significantly better benefits and a less stressful working environment. See https://www.cdaid.org/files/HR/Water -_Copy.pdf (wages); https://www.cdaid.org/32/departments/hr/summary-of-benefits (benefits). What's more, for all but one of the positions in question, the City of Coeur d'Alene's salary is higher than the comparable Gem State Water position after the 10% increase. Fourth, Staff does not employ a sound methodology for recommending a 5% increase. It appears that Staff simply"averages the averages" of nationwide data for positions with similar titles, without taking into account company-specific factors, including job responsibilities, cost of living, local salaries, and other factors. Staff s "average of averages" is actually 5.59%which is rounded down to 5%without explanation. Rounding down the average of averages does not provide a sufficient or well-reasoned basis for selecting a 5%wage increase. Also, Staff appears to have been focused only on the percentage increase and not on the actual level of wages. What is important is that the level of wages needs to be competitive with similar local opportunities (such as City of Coeur d'Alene). The percentage increase needed to get to a competitive wage level may be high simply because the old wage level was too low. Attracting and retaining high-quality employees is important to ensure continuing high- quality service to customers. A 10% increase is justified and reasonable. A 5% increase,by contrast, will result in the Company falling further behind its competitors, making it even more REPLY COMMENTS PAGE 3 OF 5 difficult to catch up in the future. The Company requests that the Commission approve the requested 10% salary increase (and reject Staffs proposed $17,141 adjustment). 2. Depreciation Rates Staff has recommended that Gem State Water's depreciation rates be standardized by NARUC account and has recommended revised depreciation rates for many of Gem State Water's assets. The Company agrees with most of Staffs depreciation rate adjustments, with two minor exceptions. First, Staff recommends a 25-year life for account 311 "Pumping Equipment." The NARUC recommended lives for account 311 are 20 years for"Pumping Equipment" (i.e., the actual pumps) and 25 years for"Other Pumping Plant" (both are included in account 311.) Gem State Water's experience is that pumps' lives tend to be closer to 20 years than to 25 years. Since pumps are the largest component of the 311 account, the Company recommends using a 20-year life for account 311. Second, Staff assigns 10 or 20 year lives to items in account 340 "Office Furniture and Equipment."Most items in that account are computer hardware and software. Under GAAP, software would generally have a 3-year life and hardware a 5- or 7-year life. The Company believes it is unrealistic to expect laptops and similar items to last 10 years. For this reason, the Company recommends a life of 5 years for account 340. Dated: July 7, 2025. GIVENS PURSLEY LLP By Preston N. Carter Preston N. Carter Givens Pursley LLP Attorneys for Gem State Water Company, LLC REPLY COMMENTS PAGE 4 OF 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 7, 2025, I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document to the person(s) listed below by the method indicated: Monica Barrios-Sanchez ® Email Commission Secretary ❑ U.S. Mail Idaho Public Utilities Commission ❑ Fax P.O. Box 83720 ❑ Hand Delivery Boise, Idaho 83720-0074 monica.barriossanchez&puc.idaho.gov Preston N. Carter Preston N. Carter REPLY COMMENTS PAGE 5 OF 5 GEM STATE WATER COMPANY Exhibit 1 to Reply Comments Revenue Requirement Comparison Company Original Staff Company Reply Request Recommended Recommended 1 Rate Base $ 3,813,776 $ 3,774,729 $ 3,776,659 2 Required Rate of Return 7.96% 7.51% 7.51% 3 Net Operating Income Requirement $ 303,538 $ 283,293 $ 283,438 4 Net Operating Income Realized $ (145,019) $ 12,850 $ (24,674) 5 Net Operating Income Deficiency $ 448,557 $ 270,443 $ 308,112 6 Net Operating Income Deficiency 448,557 270,443 308,112 7 Gross up Factor 1.345668 1.339644 1.339644 8 Total Incremental Revenue Requirement $ 603,609.33 $ 362,297.95 $ 412,760.96 9 Revenues at existing rates $ 763,610 $ 763,610 $ 763,610 10 Total Revenue Requirement $ 1,367,219 $ 1,125,908 $ 1,176,371 11 Percent Increase Required 79.0% 47.4% 54.1% GEM STATE WATER COMPANY Exhibit 2 to Reply Comments Proposed Rates Comparison Gallons Included in Minimum Customer Charge Minimum Customer Charge Commodity Rate:Per 1,000 Gallons Above Volume Included. (Allowance) Company Staff and Meter Size(Inches) Present Company Application Staff Company Reply Present Company Application Staff Company Reply Present Application Company Reply STAFF RECOMMENDED SCHEDULE 1 Bar Circle S and Spirit Lake 1 $ 35.00 $ 53.50 53% $ 46.00 31% $ 47.67 36% $ 2.52 $ 4.50 79% $4.17 65% $ 4.27 69% 7,500 5,000 7,500 Bar Circle S and Spirit Lake 1.5 $ 70.00 $ 107.00 53% $ 92.00 31% $ 95.34 36% $ 2.52 $ 4.50 79% $4.17 65% $ 4.27 69% 15,000 10,000 10,000 Bar Circle S and Spirit Lake 2 $ 112.00 $ 171.20 53% $147.00 31% $152.34 36% $ 2.52 $ 4.50 79% $4.17 65% $ 4.27 69% 30,000 20,000 20,000 Bitterroot and Rickel 1 $ 35.00 $ 53.50 53% $ 46.00 31% $ 47.67 36% $ 2.45 $ 4.50 84% $4.17 70% $ 4.27 74% 10,000 5,000 7,500 Troy Hoffman 1 $ 35.00 $ 53.50 53% $ 46.00 31% $ 47.67 36% $ 2.45 $ 4.50 84% $4.17 70% $ 4.27 74% 7,500 5,000 7,500 Diamond Bar Estates 1 $ 41.00 $ 53.50 30% $ 46.00 12% $ 47.67 16% $ 2.45 $ 4.50 84% $4.17 70% $ 4.27 74% 7,500 5,000 7,500 Diamond Bar Estates 2 $ 112.00 $ 171.20 53% $147.00 31% $152.34 36% $ 2.45 $ 4.50 84% $4.17 70% $ 4.27 74% 35,000 20,000 20,000 Diamond Bar Irrigation 1 $ 35.00 $ 53.50 53% $ 46.00 31% $ 47.67 36% $ 2.26 $ 4.50 99% $4.17 85% $ 4.27 89% 7,500 5,000 7,500 Diamond Bar Irrigation 1.5 $ 70.00 $ 107.00 53% $ 92.00 31% $ 95.34 36% $ 2.26 $ 4.50 99% $4.17 85% $ 4.27 89% 20,000 10,000 10,000 Diamond Bar Irrigation 2 $ 112.00 $ 171.20 53% $147.00 31% $152.34 36% $ 2.26 $ 4.50 99% $4.17 85% $ 4.27 89% 32,000 20,000 20,000 STAFF RECOMMENDED SCHEDULE 2 Happy Valley 1 $ 35.00 $ 53.50 53% $ 46.00 31% $ 47.67 36% $ 1.45 $ 4.50 210% $4.17 188% $ 4.27 194% 15,000 5,000 15,000 Happy Valley 1.5 $ 70.00 $ 107.00 53% $ 92.00 31% $ 95.34 36% $ 1.45 $ 4.50 210% $4.17 188% $ 4.27 194% 15,000 10,000 15,000 Happy Valley 2 $ 112.00 $ 171.20 53% $147.00 31% $152.34 36% $ 1.45 $ 4.50 210% $4.17 188% $ 4.27 194% 30,000 20,000 20,000 Lynnwood 1 $ 35.00 $ 53.50 53% $ 46.00 31% $ 47.67 36% $ 2.45 $ 4.50 84% $4.17 70% $ 4.27 74% 15,000 5,000 15,000