20250610Decision Memo.pdf

DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSIONER LODGE
COMMISSIONER HAMMOND
COMMISSIONER HARDIE
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF
LEGAL
FROM: CHRIS BURDIN
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
DATE: JUNE 10, 2025
SUBJECT: IN THE MATTER OF COMMISSION STAFF'S APPLICATION FOR
APPROVAL OF AN OVERSIGHT PROCESS FOR THE ACQUISITION
OF LARGE SUPPLY-SIDE ELECTRICAL RESOURCES; CASE NO.GNR-
E-25-01.
On April 16, 2025, the Commission set a May 7, 2025, intervention deadline for this
case. Order No. 36549. After the intervention deadline ran,on May 23,2025,Micron Technology,
Inc. ("Micron") filed a petition to intervene. The issue before the Commission is whether to grant
the late petition.
RULES GOVERNING LATE PETITIONS TO INTERVENE
Commission Rules provide that a petitioner seeking intervention must state its "direct
and substantial interest . . . in the proceeding." IDAPA 31.01.01.072. Petitions to intervene that
are not timely filed "must state a substantial reason for delay." IDAPA 31.01.01.073. "The
Commission may deny or conditionally grant petitions to intervene that are not timely filed for
failure to state good cause for untimely filing to prevent disruption, prejudice to existing parties,
or undue broadening of the issues, or for other reasons." Id. Also, "Intervenors who do not file
timely petitions are bound by orders and notices earlier entered as a condition of granting the
untimely petition."Id.
MICRON'S PETITION
Micron states it has a direct and substantial interest in this proceeding.
Micron further states that granting its Petition will not disrupt this proceeding,prejudice
existing parties, or unduly broaden the issues in this proceeding.
DECISION MEMORANDUM 1

COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission wish to grant Micron's late petition to intervene?
C�.
Chris Burdin
Deputy Attorney General
L\Lega1\ELECTRIC\GNR-E-25-01_0versight\memos\dec2_1ate Micron in_cb.docx
DECISION MEMORANDUM 2