20030418Supplemental Responses to Staff.pdf

Avista Corp.
1411 East Mission PO Box 3727
Spokane. Washington 99220-3727
Telephone [phone]
Toll Free 800-727-9170
HECEIVED 0FILED 0 ~'~'V'STA.
2003 APR I a AM 9: 2 I Corp.
April 17 , 2003
j J;\i iJ j~i lH3Li G
UTILITiES COt1MISSION
VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Ms. Jean Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
PO Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
RE:Case No. A VU-02-08 (Potlatch Corporation v. A vista Utilities)
Ms. Jewell :
Please find enclosed three (3) copies of A vista s SUPPLEMENTAL responses to Staff
Production Request No.(s) 2, 2C, and 3.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
-1 (
Mike Fink
Rate Analyst
Enclosures
cc:Blair Strong
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 17th day of April 2003, I caused to be served a true
and correct copy of the foregoing by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following:
Ms. Jean Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
PO Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Conley Ward
Givens Pursley LLP
277 North 6th Street, Suite 200
PO Box 2720
Boise, Idaho 83701
US Mail
Hand Delivery
Facsimile
Overnight Mail
Electronic Mail
US Mail
Hand Delivery
Facsimile
Overnight Mail
Electronic Mail
VISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
REQUEST NO.Supplemental
DATE PREPARED: 04/11/2003
WITNES S
RESPONDER: Clint Kalicl1
DEPT./JOB TITLE: Energy Resources/Manager of
Resource Planning & Analysis
[phone]TELEPHONE:
JURISDICTION: Idaho
CASE NO: A VU-02-
REQUESTER: IPUCTYPE: Data Request
REQUEST:
What would be the rate offered to Potlatch if the rate was based on use of the avoided cost
methodology for projects larger than 10 MW as described in the Settlement Stipulation in Case
No. IPC-95-9? Please provide the AURORA input data files (AURORA project file and MDB
file) and the output file used to determine the rate. Also provide a copy of any analysis done
outside of the AURORA model to compute the avoided cost rate.
RESPONSE:
After discussion with Staff, the Company has prepared this supplemental response to Data
Request 2. The information is CONFIDENTIAL and is provided with Data Response 2C-
Supplemental. Data Response 2C-Supplemental contains six AURORA model runs, and the
summarized results, on an attached CD.
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
AVISTA CORPORATION
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
JURISDICTION: Idaho
CASE NO: A VU-02-
REQUESTER: IPUCTYPE: Data Request
REQUEST NO.Supplemental
DATE PREPARED: 04/11/2003
WITNES S
RESPONDER: Clint Kalich
DEPT./JOB TITLE: Energy Resources/Manager of
Resource Planning & Analysis
[phone]TELEPHONE:
REQUEST:
Please provide analysis showing the avoided cost rate determined using the following
assumptions:
a. assuming the Coyote Springs II project is already built and available for dispatch, and
b. assuming the Coyote Springs II project has not been built and is not available for
dispatch.
RESPONSE:
Based on the results of Data Response 2-Supplemental, the E-95-9 Rate result is modified to
equal $33.83/MWh.
- -- -- ---- -- -
CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
WERE INCLUDED IN THIS FILING
- -