20250407Comments_33.pdf

The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Pam Urza
Submission Time:Apr 4 2025 12:54PM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:431 Fletcher Dr
Nampa , ID 83686
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: ICP-25-16
Comment: "We were paying approximately$300.00 every month for power for an all electric house.
We invested$69,000 into rooftop solar panels.At first we paid in the winter for both panels and
electricity but in the summer the power bill was less than $25 a month. Nowthe bill is in the$200 a
month range plus the$349+for the panels. How in the world are we going to pay for all of that on a
fixed income. "
---------------------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Logan Swanson
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 8:34AM
Email: toga n.p.swanson@gmaiLcom
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 12127 W Kittredge drive
Kuna, ID 83634
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I have a solar system on my home.This will affect me and my community greatly!
Please do not move forward with this change"
-----------------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Des Hess
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 11:20AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 10454 Seville Drive
Nampa, ID 83687
1

Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I request Idaho Power not be allowed to adjust solar buy back"
--------------------------------------------
Name: Michael Keeth
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 11:33AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:2568 S Tagish Way
Meridian, ID 83642
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "If I'm reading Idaho Power's case for reducing the export rates, because so much new
solar has come online they haven't needed to budget capacity upgrades except for summer peak
periods,therefore their avoided cost is zero for all non-peak times, and they should therefore get to
essentially pay nothing for that solar power that saved them that money?Clearly they must have
some avoided costs for summer mid-peak and winter on-peak because they charge more for those
periods on their time of use plans even though they only give the off-peak export rate for those
same periods. Makes no sense for me. I can understand true net metering not being fair to other
customers because it doesn't cover fixed costs, but these new rates for net billing are ridiculous,
Idaho Power essentially saying they can get the proceeds of our investments for effectively free. My
solar system just came online in January, I've never even gotten to export at the highest peak
summer rates and it seems like they they will be reduced before I ever do.At the off-peak winter
rates they are proposing I might as well just disconnect my system from the grid,the amount they
will be paying for the power won't be worth the fixed charges they make us pay to be connected,
would have to export more than 1500kWh/mo just to break even:'
---------------------------------------------------
Name: Bryan Siddall
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 11:41AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 342 S Sunset Point Way
Meridian, ID 83642
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
2

Comment: "ID"
------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:Jared Day
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 12:02PM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 16771 N Braxton Ave
Nampa, ID 83687
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "The solar credit rate should not be reduced further."
-------------------------------------------------------
Name:Jared Egginton
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 12:22PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 1156 W Karluk River Dr
Meridian, ID 83642
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I am writing to express my strong opposition to Idaho Power's proposal to reduce
payments to customers who generate their own power.This move follows an already burdensome
300% increase in the fixed monthly service charge—an increase that disproportionately affects
customers seeking energy independence and sustainability.
It is clear that Idaho Power is targeting small-scale power generators in an effort to discourage
distributed generation.This reduction in compensation—combined with the steep increase in fixed
charges—signals an abuse of their monopolistic position, aimed at suppressing competition and
customer choice.
Rather than penalizing customers who invest in renewable energy solutions, Idaho Power should be
encouraging such behavior,which ultimately strengthens grid resilience and supports state and
national clean energy goals.
urge the Commission to reject this proposal and take a closer look at the pattern of actions Idaho
Power is taking against customer-generators. Fair compensation and equitable rate structures are
3

essential to a just and modern energy system.
Sincerely,
Dr Jared Egginton"
----------------------------------------------
Name: Brian Albertson
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 12:42PM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:4225 S. Choctaw Way
Boise, ID 83709
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "This is absolutely ridiculous! we are currently paying half at best for solar generated
KW's worth and proposal reduces that significantly. I agree w/prior comments/points made by
Robert Rutkowski (4/3/25), and Tyler Grange (4/4/25) amongst others who commented
recently. Please throwaway this proposal and re-submit w/fair rates(closer to if not exactly a 1:1
exchange of KWs). Also as I selected above, I'd be interested in the attendance of workshop, but
prefer in-person
Thank you Brian"
-------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:J M Telford
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 1:39PM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:4915 N Gooder John Ln
Eagle, ID 83616
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-1
Comment: "First we are encouraged by IP to install rooftop solar systems, and now, having invested
tens of thousands of dollars,they propose further devaluing the energy we send to the grid? How
can the IPUC justify a 250% reduction in the blended rate of return and less than a penny per KWH
non summer, a reduction of over 500%, this after cutting that rate of return last year by
half. Should this shocking affront to current and future solar producers be allowed,there will be
zero incentive to install a solar system,very little incentive to return power to the grid and a fatal
4

blow will be dealt to the private solar industry in Idaho. "
------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Mark Norman
Submission Time:Apr 52025 1:20PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 3618 W Remembrance Dr
Meridian, ID 83642
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "If implemented this should be grandfathered in.There were several studies submitted
in 2022-2023 when net metering ended.What has changed so significantly in the past 12 months
that a >50% reduction in compensation is needed?"
--------------------------------------------------
Name: Denise Gray
Submission Time:Apr 52025 1:58PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:7860 e homestead ct
Nampa, ID 83687
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I have been informed that Idaho Power is moving to change the structure of the credit
system for solar power yet again. Even as the cost of power is rising,they are lowering the rate at
which they pay back customers who generate. This has made our solar power system nonsensical
and is a blatant money grab on idaho power's part. "
--------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Larry Camp
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 1:51 PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 6877 E Obelisks St
Boise, ID 83716
5

Name of Utility Company: idaho power
Case ID: PC-E-25-15
Comment: "not fair to change net metering for people who got solar with expected comp rate,we
are told by governments to go green and then get punished when doing it.This massive rate cut
completely changes the ROI for solar customers, Idaho should be better for this,the already pay
less than half of retail price, it shouldn't drop any further. IF this must be passed current customers
need to be grandfathered at the old rate. "
-------------------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:Thomas Martin
Submission Time:Apr 52025 2:20PM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:9709 W CASCADE ST, BOISE, ID 83704-9777
Boise, ID 83704
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "It is hard to believe Idaho Power would not be ashamed to come before the IPUC with
this latest proposal, but here they are.
would ask the IPUC board to do the right thing and outright reject Idaho Power's proposal, in full
and total, and tell Idaho Power they need to increase their compensation to solar generators to
keep pace with annual inflation. They should NOT be trying to take advantage of customers that
have taken the initiative to provide clean power to their communities and reduce the need for Idaho
Power to build ever greater and bigger power generation plants:'
----------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Marshall Holt
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 3:09PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:7901 wTillamook
Boise, ID 83709
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
6

Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I encourage public utility commission to deny Idaho powers request to undercut and
eventually do away with the solar program and net metering.They are putting the burden onto us
who have invested tens of thousands of dollars to help with the energy issues and love solar.
With the legislatures concerns about Meta and other major energy guzzling corporations moving
into Idaho,You would think idaho power would find other ways two cut costs and take care of their
investors at the same time and not put it on the back of the few that have invested into the solar
program:'
-------------------------------------------------------
Name:WILLIAM JENKINS
Submission Time:Apr 52025 3:22PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 11935 w Lewisburg court
Boise, ID 83709
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "Please notify me of any hearings/meetings concerning this proposed increase to Idaho
Consumers'electrical power."
-----------------------------------------------------
Name: steven marshall
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 3:40PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 145 north road
jerome, ID 83338
Name of Utility Company: idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I installed solar panels and back up battery for my home last year. I calculated the
payback savings on electricity vs cost of system on rates Idaho Power was charging last year. If
Idaho Power cuts the rate they give me on extra solar power going back into their system, I probably
would not have put in my solar system. solar power is a great way to meet Idaho Power's peak
demand hours and is reliable 220 days per year. I have done extensive research on this subject.
steven marshall PE10197"
--------------------------------------------------------
7

The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Patrick Kurdy
Submission Time:Apr 52025 6:22PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:2662 S Shadywood Way
Boise, ID 83716
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID:
Comment: "We have been through enough regarding Idaho Power and killing our solar benefits.We
are helping this environment!"
--------------------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Collin Swainston
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 9:12PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 1883 Kinghorn Rd
Pocatello, ID 83201
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-2515
Comment: "Regarding proposed solar changes-
Idaho Power already greatly decreased the value of thousands of solar customers systems last
year.Why, especially in such a short period of time, are we allowing them to decrease the payback
rate so drastically???This is absurd, leaving almost NO payback for solar outside of summer time
on peak.Thousands of Idahoan's solar systems will essentially be useless to them without battery
power. How was anyone to know this would be coming?Why is Idaho so anti-renewable energy?
Please IPUC-you've already hurt so many families with solar- PLEASE do not approve this extra
measure from Idaho Power to put a nail in the coffin to solar in Idaho.This is just greed at this point."
-------------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:Arden Schmitt
8

Submission Time:Apr 52025 5:59PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 11353 W.Zachary Ave.
Nampa, ID 83651
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "Why don't you support solar???"
----------------------------------------------------------
Name:James Brown
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 8:50PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 1847 North Siltstone Way
KUNA, ID 83634
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I have already invested in residential solar 3 years ago, including battery backup,to
offset power interruptions. Further, reducing the demand on Idaho power consumption should not
result in reducing the value of power I contribute to the grid. "
-------------------------------------------------------
Name: Matt Krahn
Submission Time:Apr 5 2025 9:11 PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:2313 ona street
Boise, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "Avery unfortunate measure that hurts efforts for individual Idahoans to make personal
investments into renewable power.This measure hurts the the community and the environment
while only benefiting Idaho Power."
-----------------------------------------------------
Name:James Sorenson
Submission Time:Apr 6 2025 6:54AM
9

Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 161 Heinrich,#653
Mccall, ID 83638
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "After investing over$100,000 in a home solar generation system, 3 years ago, I've seen
a consistent drop in the associated value in the program - rates continue to go up and returns go
down.
Based on this trend, I would not recommend engaging with Idaho Power in a solar generation
agreement,am regretting my investment& am worried about the apparent trend in dropping
value of the program. "
-------------------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Matthew Wood
Submission Time:Apr 62025 8:58AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 1818 W Deep Creek Way
Nampa, ID 83686
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "Last year I had solar panels installed on my house.The next month Idaho power got
permission to pay me half the rate for the electricity we provide to them. Only during the summer
peak hours do they pay a reasonable rate.As you should know, I paid a premium for my solar panels
in order to produce the electrical power. It is not right or fair that Idaho Power pays so much less
than what it cost to produce the power. Now I understand Idaho Power is asking to reimburse even
Less.And, by the way,they don't pay me anything,they only reduce our electrical bill. So,they can
easily afford to be fair with home owners that produce solar power. Please hold Idaho Power
responsible to be fair with home owners"
-------------------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Brian Case
Submission Time:Apr 6 2025 4:18PM
Email: [e-mail]
10

Telephone: [phone]
Address:5621 Joe Ln
Nampa, ID 83714
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I am concerned about increasing power costs for On-site generation power users.
My power bill increased over 500% in 2024 vs 2023. This is totally unfair to us that have invested
large amounts of our own resources into supporting our power grid and environment. Requesting
another increase only a year after severely penalizing us with this previous increase is even worse."
--------------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:William Peterson
Submission Time:Apr 6 2025 5:20PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:24836 Thunder Cloud St
Middleton, ID 83644
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "Idaho Power Case NO. IPC-E-25-15
I am writing comments with respect to Idaho Power request to slash export credits to non-legacy
on-site generation customers. It is very interesting that Idaho Power is trying to slash on-site
generation export when they have secured a 3.73% increase in rates for 2025 for residential
customers which is not included in there 1 April 2025 filing. It is difficult very difficult for individual
residential generation customers to fight a corporate giant like Idaho Power...so I trust that the
Idaho Public Utilities Commission will take this letter to heart. I will attempt to provide you a
picture of how absurd this reduction in export credits is. First and foremost, as a residential
generation customer I generate excess power to my next-door neighbors. My power flows directly
into the power line and right to my neighbors as they are drawing power through their meters into
their homes and are charged for that power at the current rates. The electricity generated by my
system does not have to go through any costly high-power lines or substations. Idaho power does
not have to generate this energy this power and they charge for it at the going rate. My residential
9.72 kilo watt solar array was designed to power my home when we have adequate sunshine, and it
can generate excess power that is utilized by my neighbors. Idaho Power's proposal would
significantly slash the export credits for my excess power. The following table will showthe current
and proposed credits by percentage and DOES NOT take into account the 2025 3.73 rate increase. I
11

am not sure how the rate increase will be applied by Idaho Power.
Current Idaho Power Rate Current Credit Rate Proposed Credit Rate
Summer
24.7398 peak 16.9966 peak 14.0598 peak
6.1850 off peak 5.65331 off peak 1.7682 off peak
Non-Summer
12.8267 peak 4.83650 peak 0.9540 peak
8.5511 off peak 4.83650 off peak 0.9540 peak
The numbers are telling as Idaho Power would basically be paying 56.8%(14.0598/24.7398) of the
going rate for the power it credits to the residential generation customer. They make$43.2%on
every kilo watt hour during peak summer hours!This is when the electrical grid is stressed, and
residential generation customers are really helping Idaho Power. It only gets worse when comparing
the numbers during non-summer peak when Idaho Power is paying 7.4%(.9540/12.8267)for the
power it credits to the residential generation customer!They make 92.6%on every kilo watt hour
during peak non-summer hours! During off peak non-summer the percentages are 11.1%in credits
and making 88.9%on every kilo watt hour during off peak non-summer hours! Idaho Power has
targeted new residential generation customers with unfair and unjustified low credits.
As a Commissioner, I hope these figures make you ask hard questions to Idaho Power. (e.g. How
this is fair?;Why are credits so disproportionally low to rate structure?What real infrastructure
costs exist for Idaho Power when a residential solar array generates excess power that goes to their
neighbors?) Idaho Power should not be allowed relief in using a modified procedure as requested
in this case and a third party should be hired to review the methodology and the algorithm used to
generate their credit calculations for residential excess power generation.
Wr CAPT Bill Peterson USCG (ret)
Middleton Idaho"
---------------------------------------------
Name: Hunter Floyd
Submission Time:Apr 6 2025 7:13PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 9879 W Sunberry Ct
Star, ID 83669
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I am absolutely disgusted that Idaho Power is even trying to propose this new billing
decrease toward Solar in Idaho.This is absolutely criminal as they are trying to steal as much
money as they can.There are thousands of homeowners in Idaho with solar that are getting
negatively affected by the changes that Idaho power keeps doing towards solar. For once,you the
PUC need to stand up for the blue collar working folks that have solar, or work in the solar business
as a full time career as a way to provide for their families.This affects literally tens of thousands of
people in Idaho, and Idaho power won't even blink an eye.They continue to raise rates, service
12

charges, and now they want to kill solar in Idaho so they can continue to stand alone as the
monopoly of Idaho.This must be denied and taken into deep consideration for what Idaho power
keeps trying to get away with, as they already have stolen so much from the community as is. If you
don't believe me,go look at the 200%service charge increase, or they 40% rate increase over the
past year. Do what's right for once and help the Idaho Residence and Solar company's,we all need
your support. Idaho power makes plenty of money per month as is, someone has to take this
serious and check them out,this is CRIMINAL! "
--------------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:Jim Staab
Submission Time:Apr 7 2025 8:33AM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:2607 s Columbus st
Boise, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID:
Comment: "I don't understand why Idaho Power would reduce solar net metering rates and reduce
the ability to support power generation when all we hear about is them complaining about revenue
when the area is growing so rapidly, and we as utility customers are having to subsidize data
centers in the area that will add additional strain on our aging and old world distribution system. "
----------------------------------------------------
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:TERISSA MORAIN
Submission Time:Apr 7 2025 9:17AM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 390 n 460 w
Chubbuck, ID 83202
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "After already basically killing solar Why must IP try again so soon to destroy our
invesments and pull the Idaho economy down could you give us a break for a bit. "
13

Name: Brian Kayler
Submission Time:Apr 72025 9:58AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:7014 W Sunnybrook Dr
Boise, Id 83709-1950
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I want to express my concern over the newly proposed further reduction in net metering
rates. I invested heavily in a solar system for my home with the goal to both reduce my reliance on
off site generated power and add value to my home.The reduction of net-metering rates in 2024
have already reduced the value of both of the stated goals above. If the newly proposed further
reductions go into effect,this will become a net negative for my home value and substantially
reduce any savings by producing solar power at my home.The State of Idaho should be
encouraging homeowners to make investments into their homes, including solar power, but
policies like this make those investments financially irresponsible. Idaho power, as a quasi
government entity, needs to work for the people and not just shareholders. I highly suggest that the
Idaho PUC deny Idaho Powers newest request to reduce on-site generation rates.The impact to
taxpayers who have invested in home based solar will be substantial and make those investments a
drag on the economy,which in our current environment is the wrong decision. "
-----------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Kathy Tidwell
Submission Time:Apr 7 2025 10:43AM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:2615 S. Holden Lane
Boise, ID 83706
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID:
Comment: "I understand that Idaho Power is once again asking to decrease the value of rooftop
solar. Please stop them from doing this again! This serves as a disincentive for people who want to
install solar and is ridiculously unfair to those of us who already have it. Where is our voice in your
deliberations? It seems as though Idaho power gets rubber stamp approval for anything they
ask. Please consider our voices as you weigh their request. "
-------------------------------------------
14

The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Kristal West
Submission Time:Apr 7 2025 11:17AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:8 S Randall St
Boise, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "Hello. I am a customer of Idaho Power in Boise and my husband and I bought solar
panels in 2023 trying to do the right thing for the environment, energy efficiency, and our future. Our
first year,the fee to be hooked into the grid TRIPLED from$5 to$15.As soon as our system was up
and running, Idaho Power dropped the compensation rate on kilowatt-hours. Now, not only do they
want to make a significant drop again,theywant to be able to do that every year so people will have
no idea how to budget for their power.
Under this new proposal, rates would plummet 80 percent to less than 1 cent per kilowatt-hour for
those 8 months out of the year.At the same time,the company will charge other customers at least
8 cents per kilowatt-hour for the same electricity to pad its profits. So, basically, Idaho Power gets
to actually PROFIT off of the backs of hardworking Idahoans who tried to do the right thing for the
environment at a time when everyone's financial situation is already precarious. It's a slap in the
face.
Please DO NOT approve this decrease.You will harm Idahoans and for sure, no one will be
interested in trying to be responsible and do what's right for clean energy in the future:'
----------------------------------
Name: BRIAN BURGE
Submission Time:Apr 7 2025 11:56AM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:23479 LOWER PLEASANT RIDGE ROAD
WILDER, ID 83676
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-15
Comment: "I belive it would be a poor decision to drastically reduce compensation for Solar
customers. I and many others that I know went to a large out of pocket expense to do our part in
reducing the impact on the power supply demand created by the increase in population in this
state. It would be a slap in the face to be penalized for trying to do the right thing.Thank you for the
15

opportunity for my voice to be heard. "
----------------------------------------------
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name:Jacob Chenoweth
Submission Time:Apr 7 2025 11:33AM
Email:[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 11712 West Precept Lane
Kuna, ID 83634
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-25-25
Comment: "As a local Idahoan and has rooftop solar installed on my residence I oppose Idaho
Powers ECR(Export Credit Rate) change.
The Public Utilities Commission needs to stand by and stand for the people of Idaho and not a
corporation.The VOIDER study done by Idaho Power undervalued roof top solar. If PUC wants to
judge and decide what is right for the power utility users of Idaho then at the very least consider 3rd
party study.
It seems very much like solar power for me and to for thee from Idaho Power, and what makes it
more egregious is in the same year Idaho Power is requesting a general rate hike and the same time
devaluing solar customers.
Idaho PUC should be for the residents of Idaho and not for investors and shareholders:'
16