20250314Comments_2.pdf

The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Gabriel lacoboni
Submission Time: Mar 14 2025 3:55PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address:418 Vista Avenue
Lewiston, ID 83501
Name of Utility Company:Avista Utilities
Case ID:AVU-G-25-01
Comment: "Hello,
am writing in regards to Case AVU-G-25-01,Avista's request for a general rate increase. As a resident of
Lewiston who resides in Avista's service area, I stand opposed to the request as it stands. An increase in
rates is understandable. A cumulative 10% increase in electrical rates combined with a new, larger base,
minimum rate and 5% increase in gas rates is not. Z
Avista enjoys a monopoly in this area due to being a publicly regulated utility. This means as long as they
convince the Commission the costs are justified they can do whatever they like. While I do not fault Avista
for asking for an increase I do not believe they have contemplated how much of a financial burden their
substantial request would put on residents less fortunate than my family. Lewiston has a median income
of$71,000, meaning the average is likely far lower. Additionally, Nez Perce County is substantially lower at
$37,859. These socioeconomic demographics indicate Avista's request would be a substantial burden on
the families they serve.
Further, many homes in their service area are older and less efficient. This means homes will need to use
more power due to poor insulation and design leading to even more costs. I urge the Commission to
consider an alternative increase phased in over two years which can more easily be absorbed by residents
of modest means.
Lastly, I hope the Commission considers the downstream impacts of Avista's request. Avista's increase
means the costs for businesses and local governments would rise as their rates rise, leading to a higher
price on goods or new/higher fees and taxes. Avista does not have seemed to.
Personally, I think Avista shouldn't just consider their needs but also the needs of their residents. A 10%
increase in electrical rates does not pass that test and I hope
the Commission reminds them of this fact. "

RECEIVED P-A
Z a �'�, �► L.3 .;� -ice �, ; s PUBLIC
3 ." rS — _O�'-1 ` IITI(_S_C©MtIiAISSiON
—
v
5--j.
04)7 ti..i w�1 _ C�.n J e_ i ✓-c c� e..—� c�a W d
ylu - -a - -
vs
— Otis
�3961S