20240911PAC to IIPA 5 Attachment Phase 1-James-PacifiCorp Verdict June 9.pdf

I IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
2 FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH
3 JEANYNE JAMES, ROBIN COLBERT, Case No. 20CV33885
JANE DREVO, SAM DREVO, BROOKE
4 EDGE AND BILL EDGE, SR., LORI Case Assigned to: Hon. Steffan Alexander
FOWLER, IRIS HAMPTON, JAMES
5 HOLLAND, RACHELLE MCMASTER,
KRISTINA MONTOYA,NORTHWEST
6 RIVER GUIDES, LLC, SHARIENE FINAL VERDICT
STOCKTON AND KEVIN
7 STOCKTON, VICTOR PALFREYMAN,
PALFREYMAN FAMILY TRUST, AND
8 DUANE BRUNN, individually and on behalf
9 of all others similarly situated,
10 Plaintiffs,
v
11 V.
PACIFICORP, an Oregon corporation;
12 and PACIFIC POWER, an Oregon
registered electric utility and assumed
13 business name of PACIFICORP,
14 Defendants.
15
16 We,the jury, find:
17
18 I. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF: NEGLIGENCE
19 QUESTION 1: Was the Defendant negligent in one or more of the ways the
20 plaintiffs claim as to the Plaintiffs and the entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas
21 below?
/ 2 8 11 24 32 37
22 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES V NO N y y y
44 48 61 69 83 96
23 y y
24
2 8 11 24 32 37
25 Santiam Canyon fire YES NO N y
44 . Q8 , 61 9 83 6
26 Y
Page 1 of 23

r
8 �
I South Obenchain fire YES y/ NO 11 24 3
37
44 48 61 , 6\ 83 9
2 FY
3
V2 8 , 11 24� 32 7
4 242 fire YES NO Y
5 44 48 61 69 83, 96
6
7
If"yes,"for any of the fire areas go to question 2.
8
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim One is for defendant for that
9
fire area. Do not answer question 2 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
10
question 1. Do not answer question 3 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
11
question 1.
12
If you answered `yes" for at least one fire area proceed to question 2. If you
13
answered "no"for all four fire areas proceed to question 4.
14
15
16
QUESTION 2: Was the Defendant's negligence a cause of harm to the Plaintiffs
17
within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
18
8 11 24 32 37 ,
19 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO 2 2 y y 37
44, 48 61 69, 83 6 20
21
2 8 11 24 32 37
22 Santiam Canyon fire YES NO N N
44 48 61 69 8 96
23 N Y Y
I
24 / 2 8 11 24 2 37
25 South Obenchaln fire YES �y/ NO NY Yy y
44 48 61 69 83 6
26 y
Page 2 of 23

1 242 fire YES V NO 2N Y 11 z4 3Y 37
4 48 61 69 83 96
2
3 At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 1 must also agree on the answer
4 to question 2 for that particular fire area.
5 If"no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim One is against the plaintiffs for
6 that fire area and for the defendant for that fire area. Please proceed to Question 3.
7
8 QUESTION 3: Was the Defendant's negligence a cause of harm to the entire class
9 within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
/ 2 8 11 24 32 37
10 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES V NO N y
44 48 6f 69 83 96
11 y ��
12
2 8 11 24 32 37
13 Santiam Canyon fire YES NO N N
Q4 f 48, 61 69 83 96
14
15
2 8 11 2Q , 32 37
16 South Obenchain fire YES NO Y
4 48 61 6\9 , 83 96
17 7
18
2 8 11 24 32 :37 ]
19 242 fire YES NO W y y
44 48 6 69\/ 83 6
20 I T
21
22
At least nine of you who answered `yes" to question 1 must also agree on the answer
23
to question 3 for that particular fire area.
24
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim One is against a finding of
25
causation as to the entire class for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire
26
area. Please proceed to Question 4, Claim Two, Gross Negligence.
Page 3 of 23

1
2 II. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF: GROSS NEGLIGENCE
3 QUESTION 4: For each fire that you answered"Yes"in response to Question 1,
4 was the Defendant grossly negligent in one or more of the ways the plaintiffs claim as to the
5 Plaintiffs and the entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
6 / 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES V NO y Y N
7 44 48 61� 69 83 9.6,
8 Y �//
9 / 2 8 11 24 3 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES y NO ICI Y (Q
10 44\ 48 61 69 83 1 96 �
11 Y �/
12 / 2 8 11 24 , 32 37,
South Obenchain fire YES NO N Y \7/ N
13 44 48 61 69 , 83 96,
14 Y Y
15 2 8 11 24 32 37
242 fire YES NO N �� y y N
16 44 48 Y, Y
61y 6Q , 83 9,6
17 Y
If"yes, "for any of the fire areas go to question 5.
18
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Two is for defendant for that
19
fire area. Do not answer question 5 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
20
question 4. Do not answer question 6 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
21
question 4.
22
If you answered `yes" for at least one fire area proceed to question 5. If you
23
answered "no"for all four fire areas proceed to question 7.
24
25
26
Page 4 of 23

I QUESTION 5: Was the Defendant's gross negligence a cause of harm to the
2 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
3 _ / 2 8 11 2`4 / 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES �/ NO .� y y 7 N
4 44 48 61 69 83 96
5
y
6 / 2 8 11 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES y NO N y y N
7 44 48 61 61 69 8� 96
9 / 2 \� 11 24 32 _ 37,
South Obenchain fire YES V NO
1 0 44 48 61 69 83 96
11 Y
12 2 8 11 24 32 37_
242 fire YES NO Y "vf
13 44 ,. 48 61 69� 83 6
14
At least nine of you who answered `yes" to question 4 must also agree on the answer
15
to question 5 for that particular fire area.
16
If"no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Two is against the plaintiffs for
17
that fire area and for the defendant for that fire area. Please proceed to Question 6.
18
19
QUESTION 6: Was the Defendant's gross negligence a cause of harm to the entire
20
class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
21
2 8 11 24 32 37
22 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO
44 48 61 69 3 96
23
24 , 2 8 11 24 32 37
25 Santiam Canyon fire YES y/ NO �I y (J
44 48 61 69 6
26 y y Y
Page 5 of 23

2 8 11 24 32 37
1 South Obenchain fire YES NO N
44 , 48 61 69 8Y 9
2 � �[/
3
2 8 24 32 37
4 242 fire YES V NO
44� 48 6 / 69 8� 96
5
6 At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 4 must also agree on the answer
7 to question 6 for that particular fire area.
g If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Two is against a finding of
9 causation as to the entire class for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire
10 area. Please proceed to Question 7.
11
12 ADDITIONAL CLASS QUESTIONS
.13 QUESTION 7: Was the Defendant's conduct reckless as to the Plaintiffs and the
14 entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
15 2 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO N y Y N
16 44 48 61 69� 83 96
17
18 / 2 8 11 24 32 3
Santiam Canyon fire YES V NO Y
19 44 , 48 61 , 69 83 9k f
20 �I( �/ y
21 / 2N SY 11 . 24 32`
South Obenchain fire YES �/ NO Y Y
22 44 , q8_ 61� 69 83 96
23 Y �/
24 / 2 8 11 24 32 3
242 fire YES V/ NO V
25 44 4$ , 61\/ 69` , 83` , 996
26
At least nine of you must agree. Please proceed to question 8.
Page 6 of 23

1
2 QUESTION 8: Was the Defendant's conduct willful as to the Plaintiffs and the
3 entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
4 2 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO 1 y y
5 44 48 61 69 83 96
Y
6
7 V
2 8 1 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES NO y
8 q4 , 48 , 61 69 83 96
10 2 8 11 24 3k 37
South Obenchain fire YES NO y / N
11 44 48 61 69� 83 96
12 l
13 / 2 8 11 24 32 37,
242 fire YES \ NO y Y N
14 44 48 61 69 83 6
15
At least nine of you must agree. Please proceed to Question 9, Claim Three, Private
16
Nuisance.
17
18 III. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF: PRIVATE NUISANCE
19 QUESTION 9: Did the Defendant's conduct constitute a private nuisance as to the
20 Plaintiffs and the entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
21
2 8 11 24 32 37
22 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES V NO N >/ y y
44, 4.8, 61 69 83 96
23 yl �l
24 / 2 8 11 24 37
25 Santlam Canyon fire YES uVy// NO N Y �I
44 48, 61 6 [831 6.
26 Y N mil/
Page 7 of 23

2^ I 11 24� 32 37
1 South Obenchain fire YES NO I�f
44 48 61 69 , 83 96
2
3 / 2 8 11 24 32 37
4 242 fire YES «</// NO (�
44 48 61 69 8� 9
5
6 If"yes, "for any of the fire areas go to question 10.
7 If"no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Three is for defendant for that
8 fire area. Do not answer question 10 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
9 question 9. Do not answer question 11 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
10 question 9.
11 If you answered `yes" for at least one fire area proceed to question 10. If you
12 answered "no"for all four fire areas proceed to question 12.
13
14 QUESTION 10: Was the Defendant's private nuisance a cause of harm to the
15 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
16 2 8 11 24 32 377`
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES V/ NO V y r
17 44 48 61 69 83 96 ,
18
19 / 2 8 11 24 32 7
Santiam Canyon fire YES J NO V
20 44 4-8, 61 69 _ 83 96
21 �"I Y Y
22 2 8 11 24 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES NO
23 44 4 6 69 8 96
24 /
25 / 2 8 Y
24 32 37
242 fire YES «/// NO y
26 44 48� 61 6Q , 8y 96
Page 8 of 23

1 At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 9 must also agree on the answer
2 to question 10 for that particular fire area.
3 If"no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Three is against the plaintiffs
4 for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire area. Please proceed to Question
5 IL
6
7 QUESTION 11: Was the Defendant's private nuisance a cause of harm to the entire
8 class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
9 � � 8 11 24 32 3
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO
10 44 48 6� 6 83 96
11
12 / 2 8 11 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES NO
13 44 48, 6Y 69Y 83y 9
6 '
14 /V
15 2� 8 11 24 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES NO
1 6 44 48 61 69 83 96
17
18 ` / 2 8 11 24 32 37
242 fire YES VVV NO
19 4 48 61 6,/ 3 6
20
21
At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 9 must also agree on the answer
22
to question 11 for that particular fire area.
23
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Three is against a finding of
24
causation as to the entire class for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire
25
area. Please proceed to Question 12, Claim Four, Public Nuisance.
26
Page 9 of 23

1
2
3 IV. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF: PUBLIC NUISANCE
4 QUESTION 12: Did Defendant's conduct constitute a public nuisance as to the
5 Plaintiffs and the entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
6 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO �V
7 44 48 61 6 8 96
8
9 2 8 11 24 3 7
Santiam Canyon fire YES 4 NO (�
10
44 4$ 1 6� 83 96
11 Y
12 2_ 1 8 1 I 24 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES NO N Y
13 �4 , 4\/ 61 69` 8�j 96
14 y �/
15 2W 8 11_ I 24` , 3 37
242 fire YES NO Yy
16 44 8 6Y 6Q , 83 96
17 If"yes, "for any of the fire areas go to question 13.
18 If"no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Four is for defendant for that
19 fire area. Do not answer question 13 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
20 question 12. Do not answer question 14 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
21 question 12.
22 If you answered `yes" for at least one fire area proceed to question 13. If you
23 answered "no"for all four fire areas proceed to question 15.
24
25
26
Page 10 of 23

I QUESTION 13: Was the Defendant's public nuisance a cause of harm to the
2 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
3 / 2 8 I1 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES VVV NO N y Y
4 44 4$ _ 6 69 _ 83 96
5 Y Y
6 / 2 8 II 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES «</// NO � y y Y
7 44 48 61 69 83 96
y Y Y
8 /
9 / 2 I 2 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES VVV NO N y y y
10 44 48 61` , 6 8,/ 96
11 Y y
12 � 37
242 fire YES NO 2 8. I N y 24 32 y
13 4 4$ , 61 69 8 96
14 /Y
At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 12 must also agree on the
15
answer to question 13 for that particular fire area.
16
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Four is against the plaintiffs
17
for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire area. Please proceed to Question
18
14.
19
QUESTION 14: Was the Defendant's public nuisance a cause of harm to the entire
20
class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
21
2 8 11 24 32 37
22 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO
44 48 61
23 69 83 96
Y y
24
2 8 1l 24 37
25 Santiam Canyon fire YES NO N /Y
Q4, 48 69 [8319
26 Y 61 Y
Page 11 of 23

2 8 11 24 32 37
1 South Obenchain fire YES NO
44� 48 61 1 69 8 96
2 \
3 / 2 8 11 24 32 37
4 242 fire YES 111/// NO N Y y Y y y
44 48 61 69 83 6
5
6 At least nine of you who answered `yes" to question 12 must also agree on the
7 answer to question 14 for that particular fire area.
g If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Four is against a finding of
9 causation as to the entire class for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire
10 area. Please proceed to Question 15, Claim Five, Trespass.
11
V. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF: TRESPASS
12
13 QUESTION 15: Did the Defendant's conduct constitute a trespass as to the
14 Plaintiffs and the entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
15 2 8 11 24v 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO N V / y
16 4 48 6 69 83 9
Y
17
18 2 8 11 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES NO !� Y
19 44 48 61 69 8 96
20
21 2 8 11 24 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES NO
22 44 48 61 69 83 6
23
24 i/ z,, f 8 11 z 3 7
242 fire YES " NO \
25 44,, 48 61 69 83 96
26 If'yes, "for any of the fire areas go to question 16. 1
Page 12 of 23

I If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Five is for defendant for that
2 fire area. Do not answer question 16 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
3 question 15. Do not answer question 17 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
4 question 15.
5 If you answered `yes" for at least one fire area proceed to question 16. If you
6 answered "no"for all four fire areas proceed to question 18.
7 QUESTION 16: Was the Defendant's trespass a cause of harm to the Plaintiffs
8 within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
9 2 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO Y y
10 44 48 61 69 83 96
11
12 / 2 8 11 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES 111/// NO
13 44 48 ' 61 6 83 96
14
15 / 2 8 11 2 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES ���/// NO N
16 44 4 61 69 83 9
17
18 2 1 11� Y
2� ! 3 7
242 fire YES NO if�V/
19 48 61Y 69 83 6
20
21
At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 15 must also agree on the
22
answer to question 16 for that particular fire area.
23
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Five is against the plaintiffs
24
for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire area. Please proceed to Question
25
17.
26
Page 13 of 23

I QUESTION 17: Was the Defendant's trespass a cause of harm to the entire class
2 within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
3 / 2 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES (� NO 1_V!
4 44 48 61 69 8 6
5
6 , / 2 11 2 3 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES V NO {�
7 44 48 , 1 8 96
8 �nVl
9 / 2N 8 11 24 32 7
South Obenchain fire YES NO
10 44 49 6,"
69 8 96
11
12 2 8 1 2�/ 32 37
242 fire YES NO r
13 44 48 6 6 8 Y
14
At least nine of you who answered `yes" to question 15 must also agree on the
15
answer to question 17 for that particular fire area.
16
If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Five is against a finding of
17
causation as to the entire class for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire
18
area. Please proceed to Question 18, Claim Six, Inverse Condemnation.
19
20
21
22
VI. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF: INVERSE CONDEMNATION
23
QUESTION 18: Did the Defendant's conduct constitute an intentional taking under
24
authority of law (referred to as "inverse condemnation") of the property or,portions of property
25
of the Plaintiffs and the entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
26
Page 14 of 23

/ 2 8 11 24 32 37
1 Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO «</// N y
44 48 , 61 69 83 96
2
3
/ 2 8 11 24 32 37
4 Santiam Canyon fire YES NO ✓ N \
4 48 61 69 83 96
5 �
6
2 8 11 24 37
7 South Obenchain fire YES NO ( j � J�
44 48 61 69 83 96
g1
9 /
2A I 8 11 24 32 37
10 242 fire YES NO ���/// l y (�
11 44 48 61 r 69 83 96
12 If"yes, "for any of the fire areas go to question 19.
13 If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Six is for defendant for that
14 fire area. Do not answer question 19 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
15 question 18. Do not answer question 20 for any fire area that you answered "no"for
16 question 18.
17 If you answered `yes" for at least one fire area proceed to question 19. If you
18 answered "no"for all four fire areas proceed to question 21.
19
20 QUESTION 19: Was the Defendant's inverse condemnation a cause of harm to the
21 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
22 2 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO
23 44 48 61 69 83 96
24
25 2 8 11 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES NO
26 44 48 61 69 83 96
Page 15 of 23

2 8 11 24 32 37
2 South Obenchain fire YES NO
44 48 61 69 83 96
3
4
2 8 11 24 32 37
5 242 fire YES NO
44 48 61 69 83 96
6
7 At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 18 must also agree on the
g answer to question 19 for that particular fire area.
9 If"no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Six is against the plaintiffs for
10 that fire area and for the defendant for that fire area. Please proceed to Question 20.
11
12 QUESTION 20: Was the Defendant's inverse condemnation a cause of harm to the
13 entire class within the boundaries of the fire areas below?
14 2 8 11 24 32 37
Echo Mountain Complex fire YES NO
15 44 48 61 69 83 96
16
17 2 8 11 24 32 37
Santiam Canyon fire YES NO
18 44 48 61 69 83 96
19
20 2 8 11 24 32 37
South Obenchain fire YES NO
21 44 48 61 69 83 96
22
23 2 8 11 24 32 37
242 fire YES NO
24 44 48 61 69 83 96
25
At least nine of you who answered "yes" to question 18 must also agree on the
26
answer to question 20 for that particular fire area.
Page 16 of 23

I If "no"for any of the fire areas your verdict on Claim Six is against a finding of
2 causation as to the entire class for that fire area and for the defendant for that fire
3 area. Please proceed to the instructions below and Question 21.
4
5 CLASS REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFFS' INDIVIDUAL DAMAGES
6 If you answered "yes" to question 2, question 5, question 10, question 13, or question
7 16 for some or all of the four fire areas, or if all were answered `yes", please proceed to
8 question 21 and answer the plaintiffs' individual damages questions for any fire area to
9 which you answered `yes"for question 2, question 5, question 10, question 13, or question
10 16. At least nine of you who agreed to those answers for a particular fire area, must also
11 agree on your answers to question 21 and question 22 for the same fire area.
12 If you did not answer `yes" to question 2, question 5, question 10, question 13, and
13 question 16 for a particular fire area then your verdict is against plaintiffs for that fire area
14 and for the defendant for that particular fire area. Do not answer questions 21 or question
15 22 for that particular fire area. Otherwise,please proceed to question 21.
16
17 PLAINTIFFS' INDIVIDUAL DAMAGES — FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, AND
FIFTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
18
19 QUESTION 21: What amount of economic damages, if any, do you award each
20 of the following Plaintiffs?
21
22 Plamhffs*RMA th`e bo ndaries of the Economic_Damages
l y.
23 Echo Monntam'Co�mpez fire area
24 James Holland(Echo) H Oq S S 11 , Ov
25 Rachelle McMaster(Echo) W71 do
26 Kevin Stockton(Echo) 5 0
Shariene Stockton(Echo)
Page 17 of 23

1 2 N 8 11y 24\� 32y 37 y
2 44\/ 48\/ 6\ 69 8\3 96 y
3
4 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the Economic Damages
5 Santiam Canyon fire area
6 Robin Colbert (Santiam) (c�j�� . 00
7 Jane Drevo (Santiam)
8 Sam Drevo (Santiam) SCD 2 5 d7
9 Brooke Edge (Santiam) 2,2 Ll 21-/0 , b 0
10 Bill Edge(Santiam) 2 2 Z y0 , 00
11 Lori Fowler(Santiam) z , (dO
12 Iris Hampton(Santiam) A 5 3(.- —7 -Aa , (:)o
13 Jeanyne James (Santiam) S� Ljl U , C/3
14 Kristina Montoya(Santiam) OCR 00
15 Northwest River Guides, LLC (Santiam) 33O C)o C), 007
16 2 8 11 24 32Y 37
17 44 48y 61 69 y 83Y 96
18
19
Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the Economic Damages
20
South Obenchain fire area
21
Victor Palfreyman (South Obenchain) 0 000 , 00
22 ( O n u C)DO , 00
Palfreyman Family Trust (South Obenchain)
23
2 N 8 11-( 24 32\/ 37
24
44y 48Y 61-/ 69 Y 83y 96
25
26
Page 18 of 23

1 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the. Economic•Damages
2 242 fire,area
3 Duane Brunn (242) >(p g 7 00
4 20 8 1' 24 32y 37N
5 44 48 61 69� 83 96
6
7 Please proceed to Question 22.
8
9 QUESTION 22: What amount of noneconomic damages, if any, do you award
10 each of the following Plaintiffs?
11
12 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the Non. cono>riic Damages
13 Echo Motintam Complez flee area
14 James Holland (Echo) -r 00 GOO • Oo
15 Rachelle McMaster (Echo) 5e0 Oo 0 , OO
16 Kevin Stockton(Echo) 500 OoC . 00
17 Shariene Stockton(Echo) 3 boo OOO, 60
18 2 8 24 32 37
19 44Y 48\/ 61 69` 83 96
20
21 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the Non Economic Damages
22 Santiam Canyon fire area
23 Robin Colbert (Santiam)) $q 5oi pCJO, OQ
24
Jane Drevo (Santiam) 1 4J 'SOO DUU , (-'O
25
Sam Drevo (Santiam) 4/ soo DOO , Up
26
Brooke Edge (Santiam) �/ 5 UU Ooo , '00
Page 19 of 23

I Bill Edge(Santiam) -fi'7 saw Ooo , a-)
2 Lori Fowler(Santiam)
3 Iris Hampton(Santiam)
4 Jeanyne James (Santiam) 500 OCXJ Cie,
5 Kristina Montoya(Santiam) 3 000 GOO . 00
6 Northwest River Guides, LLC (Santiam)
7 2 8 11 24 32 37Y
8 44 y 48 61 69 83 96
9
10 plauitiffs wihi<n,the bouadarie's of >ie Non Econom><c Damages
11 _
South Obenchaw.fire area
12 Victor Palfreyman (South Obenchain) 5,90 OCa
13 Palfreyman Family Trust (South Obenchain) q, 5 ex) 000, h O
14
2 8 11 24 32 � '37
15 44 48 61 / 69 83 96
16
17 „, t
Plauitiff, ';Ofh><n the boundaries of the Non Eeonomic Damages
18 242 fire area
19 Duane Brunn(242) $3t 000/ 000 , 00
20 2N 8 1 24 32 37
21
44 48 61 69 83 96
22
23
Please proceed to the instructions below and Question 23.
24
25
26
Page 20 of 23

1
2 PLAINTIFFS' INDIVIDUAL DAMAGES—SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF INVERSE
CONDEMNATION
3
4 If you answered `yes" to question 19, for some or all of the four fire areas, please
5 proceed to question 23 and answer the plaintiffs' individual damages questions for any fire
6 area to which you answered "yes"for question 19. At least nine of you who agreed to those
7 answers for a particular fire area, must also agree on your answers to question 23 for the
8 same fire area.
9 If you did not answer "yes" to question 19, for a particular fire area then your
10 verdict is against plaintiffs for that fire area and for the defendant for that particular fire
11 area. Do not answer questions 23 for that particular fire area. Otherwise, please proceed to
12 question 23.
13
QUESTION 23: What amount of just compensation, if any, do you award each of
14
15 the following Plaintiffs?
16 (Y T
Ps f dwN uc } 4a hi iY
l7auitiffs, thin the I oun arickv e " dust Go npensa on
17
Echo;Mouritam Complex fire,area �- - '� . i
18
19 James Holland(Echo)
20 Rachelle McMaster(Echo)
21 Kevin Stockton(Echo)
22 Shariene Stockton(Echo)
23 2 8 11 24 32 37
24 44 48 61 69 83 96
25
26
Page 21 of 23

I Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the Just Compensation
2 Santiam Canyon fire area
3 Robin Colbert(Santiam)
4 Jane Drevo (Santiam)
5 Sam Drevo (Santiam)
6 Brooke Edge (Santiam)
7 Bill Edge (Santiam)
8 Lori Fowler(Santiam)
9 Iris Hampton (Santiam)
10 Jeanyne James (Santiam)
11 Kristina Montoya (Santiam)
12 Northwest River Guides, LLC (Santiam)
13
2 8 11 24 32 37
14
44 48 61 69 83 96
15
16 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the Just Compensation
17 South Obenchain fire area
18 Victor Palfreyman (South Obenchain)
19 Palfreyman Family Trust(South Obenchain)
20
2 8 11 24 32 37
21
44 48 61 69 83 96
22
23
24
25
26
Page 22 of 23

r
t
1 Plaintiffs within the boundaries of the, Just Compensation.
2 '242 fire area
3 Duane Brunn(242)
4 2 8 11 24 32 37
5 44 48 61 69 83 96
6
7
8 You are now done with this form. Your presiding juror should sign this verdict form and
9 notify the clerk.
10
11
12
13 Dated: � 23 q Z5
14 Presiding Juror Number and Initials
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Page 23 of 23