Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240911Staff Comments.pdf RECEIVED Wednesday, September 11, 2024 9.28.51 AM IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CHRIS BURDIN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0314 IDAHO BAR NO. 9810 Street Address for Express Mail: 11331 W CHINDEN BLVD, BLDG 8, SUITE 201-A BOISE, ID 83714 Attorney for the Commission Staff BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE POWER COST ) ADJUSTMENT (PCA)ANNUAL RATE ) CASE NO. AVU-E-24-07 ADJUSTMENT FILING OF AVISTA ) CORPORATION ) COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF COMMISSION STAFF ("STAFF") OF the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its Attorney of record, Chris Burdin, Deputy Attorney General, submits the following comments. BACKGROUND On July 31, 2024, Avista Corporation, doing business as Avista Utilities ("Company"), filed its annual Power Cost Adjustment ("PCA") application("Application"). The Company requests that the Commission issue an order approving the level of power costs deferred in the rebate direction for the period of July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024, and approving a PCA rebate rate of 0.2050 per kilowatt-hour to be effective October 1, 2024. Application at 1. The PCA is a mechanism used to track changes in revenues and costs associated with variations in hydroelectric generation, secondary prices, thermal fuel costs, and changes in power contract revenues and expenses. The present PCA surcharge is a rate of 0.4990 per kilowatt- STAFF COMMENTS 1 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 hour, based on an overall surcharge of approximately $15.7 million, which was approved by the Commission in Order No. 35937, dated September 28, 2023, and is effective October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024. The Company represents that the proposed PCA rate adjustment of 0.2050 per kilowatt- hour would rebate approximately $6.6 million to customers effective October 1, 2024. Id. at 3. The Company states that the rebate is primarily associated with power supply costs that were lower than those included in retail rates, due to lower wholesale electric and natural gas prices, and that the net effect of the expiring surcharge, and the proposed rebate, is an overall decrease in revenue of approximately 7.4 percent, or$22.8 million. Id. STAFF REVIEW Staff reviewed the Company's Application, testimonies of Company witnesses Kevin Holland and Kaylene Schultz, and additional information provided in responses to production requests. Staff also reviewed Energy Imbalance Market(`BIM")benefits, Washington Climate Commitment Act("CCA") allowance costs, Palouse Wind and Rattlesnake Flat Wind stipulated adjustments from the previous general rate case, Clearwater-related items, and Chelan Hydro and Columbia Basin Hydro ("CBH") stipulated adjustments from the previous general rate case. Based on its review, Staff believes the PCA is generally prudent and recommends approval of the Company's Application updating Schedule 66, Temporary Power Cost Adjustment—Idaho with Staff s adjustments as discussed in further detail below. Review of PCA Deferral Staff performed an audit of the Company's Net Power Costs ("NPC")by reviewing the Company's natural gas purchases, market purchases, transmission revenue and expenses, and other deferral items. Based on review of the transactions, Staff believes the various power cost transactions are reasonable, prudently incurred, and comply with previous Commission orders and the Company's risk management policies, except for two recommended adjustments to actual NPC for Chelan Hydro and Clearwater contracts. Under Avista's PCA mechanism, the Company and its ratepayers share the difference between actual NPC and the NPC embedded in base rates. The sharing percentage is 90% for ratepayers and 10% for the Company. When actual costs are higher than those recovered STAFF COMMENTS 2 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 through base rates, Idaho customers pay 90% of the difference. When actual costs are lower, customers are credited 90% of the difference allowing the Company to keep 10%. This provides an incentive for the Company to lower NPC by operating its system more efficiently. Staff s recommended deferral balance including a Clearwater adjustment is a negative $6,991,612 as shown on Table No. 1 below. An adjustment for Chelan Hydro was subtracted from the balancing account, resulting in a projected ending balance through September 2024 of negative $7,944,802. Table No. 1: Summary of Power Supply and Deferrals for Current PCA Year -Idaho Idaho Power Cost Deferral Amount LCAI —Idaho Sales Adjustment $ (1,160,814) Net Power Supply—Actual Minus Authorized (3,458,527) Clearwater Adjustment (Without Sharing) (823,962) REC2 Revenues (2,226,028) Schedule 25P Net Cost (478,630) EIM3 Incremental O&M 379,503 Total Cost(Subject to Company Sharing) $ (7,768,458) Sharing Percentage over Authorized 90% Total Idaho Deferral Amount(W/out Clearwater Adjustment) $ (6,991,612) Balancing Account Beginning Balance as of July 2023 16,653,537 Incremental Deferral (6,991,612) Amortizations (12,354,708) Projected Amortization July 2024 through September 2024 (3,839,850) Chelan Adjustment (581,315) RPS4 Compliance (REC Retirement Benefit) Adjustment (1,058,163) Interests 227,309 Projected Ending Balance through September 2024 (7,944,802) 1 Load Change Adjustment 2 Renewable Energy Credit 'Energy Imbalance Market 4 Renewable Portfolio Standards—Washington WA I-937 5 Calculated using the Authorized Customer Deposit Rate of 2%over a 6-month period and 5%over a 6-month period. STAFF COMMENTS 3 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 Load Change Adjustment("LCA")—Idaho Sales Adjustment The Idaho LCA captures the over-or under-recovery of net power supply expense through base rates attributable to the difference between actual sales and sales used to set base rates. The Company used the correct Load Change Adjustment Rate ("LCAR") of$25.43/Megawatt-hour ("MWh") for the months of July and August 2023, and an LCAR of$24.41/MWh for the months of September 2023 to June 2024. Net Power Supply Deferral—Actual Minus Authorized The net power supply deferral captures the difference between actual NPC and the NPC embedded in base rates for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024. The deferral includes the following Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC")Uniform System of Accounts: 555 —Purchased Power, 447— Sale for Resale, 501 —Thermal Fuel, 547—CT Fuel, 456— Transmission Revenue, 565 —Transmission Expense, 557—Resource Optimization, 537—MT Invasive Species Expense, and 557—Expense Broker Fees. Purchased power costs reflect most of the Idaho jurisdictional share of the difference in costs the Company incurred for power purchases during the deferral period and the authorized power costs included in base rates. During the Review Period, actual NPC was lower than the authorized NPC for the Idaho jurisdiction. The Company's proposed Idaho's jurisdictional share of the base-to-actual difference is $3,458,527. However, the Company included Staff s Clearwater Adjustment, as described below, resulting in a base-to-actual difference of $4,282,489. Amended Response to Production Request No. 32. The differences in actual NPC relative to NPC embedded in base rates can be attributed to 1) lower than forecasted streamflow which reduced hydroelectric generation from both Avista- owned and contracted-for resources; 2) higher level of generation from Avista's natural gas-fired generation sources; and 3) increased activity in both market purchases and market sales. Renewable Energy Credit Revenue The Company books Renewable Energy Credit("REC")revenue in FERC Account No. 557. Based on Order No. 33605, the Company has separately reported actual and authorized REC revenue and expenses in its PCA filing. Idaho customers are credited $2,226,028 for REC revenues which reduce the deferral balance. STAFF COMMENTS 4 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 Schedule 25P Net Cost—Idaho In Order No. 34252, the Commission authorized a Power Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Company and Clearwater Paper Corporation ("Clearwater"). Clearwater owns and operates four thermal electric generating units rated at 132.2 MW. The units are cogeneration qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. The agreement allows the Company to purchase the energy and capacity from Clearwater and directly assign it to the Idaho jurisdiction. Any monthly difference between actual Clearwater power purchase expense and the amount embedded in the base retail rates developed in AVU-E-23-01 general rate case, is tracked through the PCA. Parties and ratepayers benefit from the Company selling bundled RECs under the new agreement. Bundled RECs generally command a higher price than unbundled REC's. Idaho customers received a benefit of$478,630 from the agreement during the PCA year which helped offset the deferral balance. Energy Imbalance Market ("EIM') In Order Nos. 35156 and 35543, the Commission authorized the Company to include EIM incremental expenses in the PCA up to the benefits realized from the EIM. The Company included$379,503 (or$341,552 after sharing) in incremental EIM operation and maintenance ("O&M") expenditures for recovery in the Idaho PCA. During this PCA period, the EIM benefits are $18.6 million at the system level, while the EIM O&M expenses are $1.1 million at the system level. Response to Staff Production Request No. 9. Staff believes that the Company has complied with Order No. 35156. Renewable Portfolio Standard (Washington.) Compliance The $1,058,163 of REC credits were retired for the REC Retirement Benefit to meet Washington's Renewable Portfolio Standard("RPS"). The credit is based on the Idaho allocation of RECs that were retired to meet Washington RPS (WA I-937) that otherwise would have been sold. The RECs used to meet Washington RPS are tracked 100% in the PCA. CCA Allowance Costs The Commission rejected the costs associated with the CCA in its entirety in Order No. 36015. Accordingly, the Company excluded all the CCA allowance expenses associated with STAFF COMMENTS 5 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 the CCA obligations incurred. Response to Staff Production Request No. 11(b). Currently, the Company assumes that all of the CCA obligations come from Idaho's share of Boulder Park generation, and that no CCA obligations will be incurred from off-system sales. Supplemental Response to Staff Production Request No. 10. Although all the CCA allowance expenses associated with the Boulder Park generation are excluded from NPC, Staff is concerned that the Company includes Idaho's portion of CCA allowance costs in Boulder Park's dispatch costs. Response to Staff Production Request No. 10(c). By including these allowance costs in the dispatch, the Company is likely not dispatching lower cost Boulder Park generation(without the cost allowances) in lieu of higher cost resources, which would result in higher NPC for Idaho customers. However, if the Company were to remove the cost of allowances from the dispatch cost, the Company would have to incur the cost of the allowances for the incremental generation without being able to recover the cost. Because dispatch decisions are based on the status of the Company's resources and circumstances at the time each dispatch decision is made, Staff believes it would be very difficult to quantify the impact; thus, Staff is not proposing an adjustment in this case. However, Staff recommends the Company track the cost impact of using a Boulder Park dispatch cost without the cost of allowances over the remaining PCA year to be reported in next year's PCA filing. Palouse Wind and Rattlesnake Flat Wind For Palouse Wind and Rattlesnake Flat Wind, the Settlement Stipulation in Case No. AVU-E-23-01, approved in Order No. 35909, allowed 90% of actual costs and 90% of base costs to be included in the PCA. Staff verified that this is accurately reflected in the Company's proposal. Clearwater-related Items Staff reviewed Clearwater-related items, which include the treatment of Clearwater in the PCA, the calculation of purchased power expenses, transmission expenses, and REC revenues. In removing actual Clearwater's expense, the Company mistakenly calculated them using the incorrect avoided cost rates for January through June of 2024. By using the correct avoided cost rates, this results in a reduction in actual system Purchased Power expense of$2,390,366 (Idaho STAFF COMMENTS 6 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 Allocation is $823,962). After applying the authorized jurisdictional allocation factor and customer sharing, Idaho customers will see an additional rebate of$741,566. Staff verified that purchased power expenses associated with Clearwater are removed from both authorized expenses and actual expenses. This treatment aligns with the arrangement under the current Clearwater contract. Staff also verified that the purchased power expenses Avista pays Clearwater are offset by the revenues associated with the Schedule 25P Block 2 Generation Load Clearwater pays Avista. According to Section 10(d) of the Clearwater contract, all Net Revenue from Sales of the Product will be split between Clearwater(90%) and Avista(10%). Avista's share of both transmission costs and REC revenue from this contractual arrangement are within the definition of"Net Revenue from Sales of the Product." Response to Staff Production Request No. 31. Staff verified that 10% of these two components are included in the deferral,both of which are subject to customer sharing. Columbia Basin Hydro ("CBH") /Chelan Hydro Purchase Power Agreements The Settlement approved through Order No. 35909 in Case No. AVU-E-23-01, stipulated that the cost of CBH and Chelan Hydro would be included in the PCA using the "lesser of' market or contract cost, and to allow the Company to recover all or some of the approximately $1.007 million in transmission cost to the extent that Market prices are higher than the cost of CBH generation with the cost of transmission included. Staff and the Company developed a mechanism to meet the intent of the agreement, which was subsequently provided to the Settling Parties intervening in the case for feedback and agreement. No party provided any feedback or disagreement with the design of the mechanism. Staff s review of the actual amounts included in the PCA were based on the design of the agreed upon"lesser of mechanism. Chelan Hydro Staff reviewed the actual costs included in the PCA relative to the agreed upon mechanism but found that the Company did not use the correct contract rate, which should have been based on invoiced amounts and actual generation resulting in a potential $1,399,513 adjustment benefiting Idaho customers. However, after discussions with the Company, Staff believes the mechanism may be unfairly accounting for the cost of the contract relative to the STAFF COMMENTS 7 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 benefits by using unit cost "lower of"monthly monthly comparisons. Staff believes that an adjustment amount of$581,315 instead of the $1,399,513 is more reasonable for the current circumstances in this case and that the mechanism should be re-evaluated prior to the next PCA. Therefore, Staff recommends an adjustment of$581,315 and that the Company, Staff, and interested parties meet after the case is closed to re-evaluate the mechanism to ensure it protects Idaho customers while balancing benefits the contract may provide prior to filing the next PCA. Table No. 1 illustrates alternatives for the adjustment. The first two columns show the Mid-C market price and the contract actual amounts for January through June of 2024, when the contract term was in force during the PCA year. The third column shows the $356,186 adjustment as originally proposed by the Company, the fourth column shows the adjustment of $1,399,513 if done by strict adherence to the agreed upon mechanism, and for illustrative purposes, the fifth column includes the benefits of the contract for January when Mid-C prices were abnormally high with the resulting total net benefits across the deferral period. Table No. 2 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 "Lesser Of "Lesser Of' Mid-C Contract AcutaI Adjustment as Adjustment per Net Benefits Amount Filed Agreed upon Mechanism Jan-24 $ 7,156,142 $ 1,755,720 $ - $ - $ 5,400,422 Feb-24 $ 1,024,745 $ 1,755,720 $ (61,682) $ (730,976) $ (730,976) Mar-24 $ 929,623 $ 1,755,720 $ (401,685) $ (826,098) $ (826,098) Apr-24 $ 837,306 $ 1,755,720 $ (222,625) $ (918,414) $ (918,414) May-24 $ 905,486 $ 1,755,720 $ (156,620) $ (850,235) $ (850,235) Jun-24 $ 1,021,353 $ 1,755,720 $ (190,709) $ (734,367) $ (734,367) YTD System Total $ 11,874,655 $ 10,534,320 $ (1,033,321) $ (4,060,090) $ 1,340,332 Idaho Share $ (356,186) $ (1,399,513) $ 462,012 Through discussions with the Company, Staff recommends an adjustment of$581,315. Staff believes the adjustment should honor the stipulation and work done to develop the currently agreed upon mechanism by basing an adjustment using the $1,399,513 adjustment as a starting point. To get to a final recommended adjustment amount, the adjustment should be reduced by the $356,186 amount the Company has already incorporated into the deferral, and Staff believes it would be fair to further reduce it by the $462,012 net benefits that occurred over the six-month STAFF COMMENTS 8 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 period. Staff recommends that this adjustment only apply in this case and that the Company, Staff, and interested parties reevaluate the mechanism prior to next year's PCA filing. CBH Staff verified that CBH has the correct contract price and actual generation amounts, and that the actual cost passed into the deferral uses the lower of market or contract price per the agreed upon mechanism. CBH transmission expenses may be incurred to accommodate CBH hydro projects. However, the existing CBH hydro projects have not incurred any incremental transmission costs during the PCA deferral period. Response to Staff Production Request No. 18. Because the existing transmission capacity can accommodate the existing CBH hydro projects, Staff believes it is reasonable to not include CBH transmission expenses in this PCA. Analysis of PCA Rates Through a supplement to Staff Production Request No. 32, the Company provided new PCA rate calculations that incorporate adjustments for Clearwater of$741,566 and for Chelan Hydro of$581,315, which both increase the amount of the proposed rebate. Based on its review of the PCA rate calculations, Staff verified that the result is accurate and will reasonably refund customers for overcollection of actual NPC embedded in base rates. Using the PCA rebate rate of 0.2460 per kilowatt-hour, residential customers using an average of 927 kilowatt-hours per month would see their monthly bills decrease from $104.18 to $97.10, a decrease of$7.08 per month, or 6.8%. Table No. 3 provides a summary of the PCA rate calculation to be effective October 1, 2024, if authorized. Table No. 3: Summary of Proposed Rebate Rate Proposed rate Total Amortization and Deferral Balance including interest thru 9/30/24 $ (7,945) Conversion factor(Case No.AVU-E-23-01: Per Final Stipulation&Settlement) 0.996223 Revenue Requirement $ (7,975) kWh's from above 3,240,155 Proposed rate: $ (0.00246) STAFF COMMENTS 9 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 Table No. 4 provides the percent change by rate schedule to show the impact to each schedule. Because the PCA rate adjustments are spread on a uniform cents-per-kWh basis, the resulting revenue percentage change varies by customer class. Table No. 4: Percent Change of Billed Revenue by Schedule Residential 1 1,362,736 $ 148,447 $ (10,152) -6.8% General Service 11,12 591,380 $ 53,229 $ (4,406) -8.3% Large General Service 21,22 492,856 $ 51,143 $ (3,672) -7.2% Extra Large General Service 25 344,595 $ 22,608 $ (2,567) -11.4% Clearwater 25P 377,883 $ 22,810 $ (2,815) -12.3% Pumping Service 31,32 60,691 $ 7,173 $ (452) -6.3% Street&Area Lights 41-49 10,014 ` 3,932 $ (75) -1.9% Total 3,240,155 $ 309,342 $ (24,139) -7.8% Customer Notice and Press Release The Company's press release and customer notice were included with its Application. Each document addresses the following cases: (1) this case (AVU-E-24-07); (2) electric FCA (AVU-E-24-08); (3) the natural gas FCA(AVU-G-24-01); and(4)the natural gas PGA(AVU-E- 24-02). Staff reviewed the documents and determined both meet the requirements of Rule 125 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure. See IDAPA 31.01.01 .125. The notice was included with bills mailed to customers beginning August 2, 2024, and ending August 30, 2024. The Commission set a comment deadline of September 11, 2024. Some customers in the last billing cycles will not have received or had adequate time to submit comments before the deadline. Customers should have the opportunity to file comments and have those comments considered by the Commission. Staff recommends that the Commission consider late filed comments from customers. As of September 10, 2024, no customer comments had been filed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve a revenue requirement of$7,974,923 and the resulting rates with an effective date of October 1, 2024. Staff also recommends the Commission: STAFF COMMENTS 10 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 1. Approve the adjustment for Clearwater Purchased Power Cost reducing the deferral by an incremental $741,566; 2. Approve the adjustment for Chelan Hydro purchased power cost reducing the deferral by$581,315; 3. Order the Company to file conforming tariffs for Schedule 66 Temporary Power Cost Adjustment—Idaho reflecting the Commission-approved rates; 4. Order the Company, Staff, and interested parties to meet after the case is closed to re-evaluate the "lesser of market or contract" mechanism to ensure it protects Idaho customers while balancing benefits the contract may provide, prior to filing the next PCA; 5. Order the Company to track the cost impact of using a Boulder Park dispatch cost without the cost of allowances over the remaining PCA year to be reported in next year's PCA filing; and 6. Consider late-filed comments from customers. Respectfully submitted this 1 Ith day of September 2024. k, - 1,/q., Chris Burdin Deputy Attorney General Technical Staff: Laura Conilogue Yao Yin Curtis Thaden I:\Utility\UMISC\COMMENTS\AVU-E-24-07 Comments.docx STAFF COMMENTS 11 SEPTEMBER 11, 2023 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024, SERVED THE FOREGOING COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF, IN CASE NO. AVU-E-24-07, BY &MAILING A COPY THEREOF TO THE FOLLOWING: PATRICK EHRBAR DAVID J MEYER DIR OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS VP & CHIEF COUNSEL AVISTA CORPORATION AVISTA CORPORATION PO BOX 3727 PO BOX 3727 SPOKANE WA 99220-3727 SPOKANE WA 99220-3727 E-mail: patrick.ehrbargavistacorp.com E-mail: david.meyer(a avistacorp.com dockets@avistacon2.com ;X�vo�t PATRICIA JORD , SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE