Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
A202001 LOC Response
1411 E. Mission, PO Box 3727 Spokane,WA 99220-3727 Submitted to Darrin Ulmer via electronic mail at Darrin.Ulmer@puc.idaho.gov April 26,2019 Mr. Darrin Ulmer Program Manager Idaho Public Utilities Commission PO Box 83720 Boise,ID 83720-0074 Re: Response to IPUC letter dated April 3, 2019 Dear Mr. Ulmer: In your letter of April 3,2019,you documented two areas of concern discovered during the IPUC Pipeline Safety Records Audit on February 26—28, 2019. Please find herein an overview of the areas of concern/findings and Avista's responses. Area of Concern#1: Avista could not demonstrate compliance with 49 CFR§I92.615(c)Emergency Plans,49 CFR 192.605(a)Procedural manual for operations,maintenance and emergencies and Avista Gas Emergency and Service Handbook section 13 Emergency Planning. At our request the Public Safety Specialist provided documentation of all events that took place in 2018. IPUC noted inconsistencies in the required training/mock drills,documentation,personnel/entities attendance and after action plans across all construction areas including those required items underlined below. Summarization/Description of Findings for Area of Concern#1: 1. Avista did not meet the requirements of§192.615(c)which says: "Each operator shall establish and maintain liaison with appropriate fire,police and other public officials to:(1)Learn the responsibility and resources of each government organization that may respond to a gas pipeline emergency; (2)Acquaint the officials with the operator's ability in responding to a gas pipeline emergency; (3)Identify the types of gas pipeline emergencies of which the operator notifies the officials;and(4)Plan how the operator and officials can engage in mutual assistance to minimize hazards to life and property." 2. Avista did not meet the requirements of§192.605(a)which says: "Each operator shall prepare and follow for each pipeline,a manual of written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance activities and for emergency response." Avista did not follow its procedures found in Gas Emergency and Service Handbook, Section 13, Emergency Planning, specifically the sections named"Communication with Public Officials"and"Mock Emergency Drills". Avista Response to Area of Concern#1: 1. Avista concurs that the company did not meet the requirements of§192.615(c)and specifically the company could not show each Idaho construction office had maintained the appropriate liaisons and documented the meetings. Moving forward,Avista will require each construction manager to complete a Capabilities Survey annually with their applicable first responders. Additionally,each manager will be required to keep their documentation of all Public Safety Liaison Meetings(ex: PUBLIC SAFETY FORM 2019.xism)up to date and accurate to include attendee lists and training covered as applicable. 2. Avista concurs that the company did not meet the requirements of§192.605(a)when company managers did not follow written procedures found in Gas Emergency and Service Handbook, Section 13, "Communication with Public Officials". This portion of the company's standards will be followed as described in#1 above. Avista does not concur that the company did not meet the requirements of§192.605(a)when company managers supposedly did not follow written procedures found in Gas Emergency and Service Handbook, Section 13, "Mock Emergencies". Avista managers in all five construction offices did actually perform/participate in mock drills in 2018. Avista may not have shown documentation of the drills during the audit or in follow-up correspondence but has attached documentation herein of the mock drill completions for 2018. Area of Concern#2: It is the recommendation of the IPUC that the wording contained in Avista Operations Damage Prevention Program Spec.4.13 Pg. 6 Paragraph 8 be changed(See Below) Summarization/Description of Findinys for Area of Concern#2: The IPUC recommends that Spec.4.13 be changed to read: When a contract locator notifies Avista's local office of an un-locatable facility,they shall sheald take additional actions to identify the location of the facilities within the prescribed timeline of the locate ticket unless documented arrangements with the excavator have been made. Additional actions may include but are not limited to: Avista Response to Area of Concern#2: Avista will make the recommended change to the 2020 edition of the Gas Standards Manual. k Su i ed, ulkenberry Director,Natural Gas MJF/rkb Enclosure Cc: Paul Good,Compliance Manager IPUC Correspondence File TTX Sign In Sheet TTX Name: Ross Ranch Pipeline Rupture D.te: April 19, 2018 • • DA Service Center Facilitator: Name Department Position Phone NUmbeNEXT CDA qq(a &Cke4k I C-0A �-as c� .�Q� ao - &do- 7S76r l 510ak u dollat /"J. APP-6;) i , �►- Eal- 66-0 0 DOO "k5enbe r (-DA A& c c-i 20V-(,)Szt -z0015 a �ar 5w�bfi;� L CREW r naru a!-f S. — ��PP MA,rIF)7T;rJ- 0q, -Hi - L-tell J1 7 51lb'::J F0.A, [ C-200dlf CV)�j © 13.2� � PA`1�44 �?��y-c �,- /tee j/EGG /d� (P 1)-09 -6 ;0 -0-)-31'? C DA M.i. 4vk/ 50�- Z90-- "S.Ig6- D 5 crro 6,1 cr ©6 - y IV I.6$ / N E o '� bAS �W D$ -! CU IG'.n Cttc)C 1`73c; Lot,", 2 7 7 11 Gl/ 1 , ! ' a p r -Z-0 6 9J -fib C� hl6gj T�1•nr, v ".ICY Y . �1�i v"G /�,Y),��. �1,�� C�QS�!'`.'.S�i lit' ll J`f'�/re,(,y �!!✓ 9 20$ -7 ��►-3 vLt�r - -1iZ�llft yi4t ZGS; ��(L, Additional spaces on back /\<7 7 r TTX Sign In Sheet TTX Name: Ross Ranch Pipeline Rupture Date: April 19, 2018 DA Service Center Facilitator: Steve Schacher !Name Department Position Phone Number/EXT Additional spaces on back Pullman Mock Emergency Sign-in Sheet December 27, 2018 PRINTED NAME WORK EMP # SIGNATURE LOCATION S-po Ia�l� I�c� L Inwa D70 r� l 7o om i Dn �ko�r- 11%14atl' D�9s5 OC)Zrz . J4%Soti LAr"