20240903PAC to Staff Supplemental 151_152.pdf

1407 W North Temple, Suite 330
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
September 3, 2024
Monica Barrios-Sanchez
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
11331 W. Chinden Blvd.
Bldg. 8, Ste. 201-A
Boise, ID 83714
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
RE: ID PAC -E-24-04
IPUC Set 8 (130-154)
Please find enclosed Rocky Mountain Power’s 1st Supplemental Responses to IPUC 8th Set Data
Requests IPUC 151 and 152.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
____/s/____
Mark Alder
Manager, Regulation
Enclosures
C.c.: Eric L. Olsen/IIPA [e-mail] (C)
Lance Kaufman/IIPA [e-mail] (C)
Matthew Nykiel/ICL [e-mail]
Brad Heusinkveld/ICL [e-mail]
Thomas J. Budge/Bayer [e-mail] (C)
Brian C. Collins/Bayer [e-mail]
Greg Meyer/Bayer [e-mail]
Kevin Higgins/Bayer [e-mail] (C)
Neal Townsend/Bayer [e-mail] (C)
Ronald L. Williams/PIIC [e-mail]
Brandon Helgeson/PIIC [e-mail]
Bradley Mullins/PIIC [e-mail]
Val Steiner /PIIC [e-mail]
Kyle Williams/PIIC [e-mail]
RECEIVED
Tuesday, September 3, 2024
IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
PAC-E-24-04 / Rocky Mountain Power
September 3, 2024
IPUC Data Request 151 – 1st Supplemental

IPUC Data Request 151

Please provide the following information for the “U21 Major Inspection Overhaul
- CY23” project referenced in production response PAC-E-24-04 Attach IPUC
15. Please include any available workpapers with formulae intact. If any of the
information requested below cannot be provided or is not available, please explain
why it is not available or cannot be provided.

(a) Please provide a detailed explanation for the need of the project including the
analysis justifying the need.

(b) Please provide a list of all the potential alternatives the Company considered
to fulfill the need and explain why the project was selected among the
alternatives supported by the Company’s economic analysis (costs and
benefits) comparing them.

(c) If a RFP or RFQ was submitted, please provide the following information:

i. A copy of the RFP or RFQ that was submitted;
ii. A detailed explanation of the selection process including the
scorecard and list of the criteria used to select the project;
iii. The short-list bidder scorecard; and
iv. A copy of the winning bid.

(d) Please provide the approved Initial Project Plan including the following:

i. Initial project scope;
ii. Initial project budget;
iii. Initial proposed schedule; and
iv. Evidence that the Initial Project Plan and budget were approved at
the appropriate level.

(e) Please provide the following for the Baseline Construction Project Plan
including the following:

i. Baseline project scope;
ii. Baseline project budget broken down by WBS;
iii. Baseline project schedule broken down by WBS;
iv. If the baseline construction project scope, budget, and/or schedule
deviated from the Initial Project Plan, please explain the
differences, explain the reason for the change, and provide
evidence that the changes were approved at the appropriate level;
v. Project status reports and action items; and
vi. Contractor change orders.

PAC-E-24-04 / Rocky Mountain Power
September 3, 2024
IPUC Data Request 151 – 1st Supplemental

(f) Please provide the following related to completion of the project:

i. Baseline construction budget-to-actual comparison by WBS and by
year;
ii. Baseline construction schedule-to-actual comparison by WBS;
iii. For any budget-to-actual cost overages by major WBS category
that is over 5%, please explain the reason for the differences and
provide evidence that the amount was approved at the appropriate
level; and
iv. Please explain any slips in schedule from the baseline construction
schedule.

1st Supplemental Response to IPUC Data Request 151

Further to the Company’s response to IPUC Data Request 151 dated August 19,
2024, the Company has become aware that it omitted to include in its response the
appropriate confidentiality provisions for the provided confidential attachment.
The Company therefore provides this 1st Supplemental response to assert the
appropriate confidentiality provisions for the provided confidential attachment.
The Company confirms that there are no changes to the Company’s original
response nor the provided confidential attachment which remain unchanged and
valid, however, the Company requests that they be subject to the confidentiality
provisions stated below:

Please refer to Confidential Attachment IPUC 151.

Confidential information is provided subject to protection under IDAPA
31.01.01.067 and 31.01.01.233, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission’s Rules of
Procedure No. 67 – Information Exempt from Public Review, and further subject
to the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) executed in this proceeding.

Recordholder: Matt Murray

Sponsor: Brad Richards

PAC-E-24-04 / Rocky Mountain Power
September 3, 2024
IPUC Data Request 152 – 1st Supplemental

IPUC Data Request 152

Please provide the following information for the “U2 CSA Variable fee - CT2 -
HGP” project referenced in production response PAC-E-24-04 Attach IPUC
15. Please include any available workpapers with formulae intact. If any of the
information requested below cannot be provided or is not available, please explain
why it is not available or cannot be provided.

(a) Please provide a detailed explanation for the need of the project including the
analysis justifying the need.

(b) Please provide a list of all the potential alternatives the Company considered
to fulfill the need and explain why the project was selected among the
alternatives supported by the Company’s economic analysis (costs and
benefits) comparing them.

(c) If a RFP or RFQ was submitted, please provide the following information:

i. A copy of the RFP or RFQ that was submitted;
ii. A detailed explanation of the selection process including the
scorecard and list of the criteria used to select the project;
iii. The short-list bidder scorecard; and
iv. A copy of the winning bid.

(d) Please provide the approved Initial Project Plan including the

i. Initial project scope;
ii. Initial project budget;
iii. Initial proposed schedule; and
iv. Evidence that the Initial Project Plan and budget were approved at
the appropriate level.

(e) Please provide the following for the Baseline Construction Project Plan:

i. Baseline project scope;
ii. Baseline project budget broken down by WBS;
iii. Baseline project schedule broken down by WBS;
iv. If the baseline construction project scope, budget, and/or schedule
deviated from the Initial Project Plan, please explain the
differences, explain the reason for the change, and provide
evidence that the changes were approved at the appropriate level;
v. Project status reports and action items; and
vi. Contractor change orders.

(f) Please provide the following related to completion of the project:
PAC-E-24-04 / Rocky Mountain Power
September 3, 2024
IPUC Data Request 152 – 1st Supplemental

i. Baseline construction budget-to-actual comparison by WBS and by
year;
ii. Baseline construction schedule-to-actual comparison by WBS;
iii. For any budget-to-actual cost overages by major WBS category
that is over 5%, please explain the reason for the differences and
provide evidence that the amount was approved at the appropriate
level; and
iv. Please explain any slips in schedule from the baseline construction
schedule.

1st Supplemental Response to IPUC Data Request 152

Further to the Company’s response to IPUC Data Request 152 dated August 19,
2024, the Company has become aware that it omitted to include in its response the
appropriate confidentiality provisions for the provided confidential attachment.
The Company therefore provides this 1st Supplemental response to assert the
appropriate confidentiality provisions for the provided confidential attachment.
The Company confirms that there are no changes to the Company’s original
response nor the provided confidential attachment which remain unchanged and
valid, however, the Company requests that they be subject to the confidentiality
provisions stated below:

Please refer to Confidential Attachment IPUC 152.

Confidential information is provided subject to protection under IDAPA
31.01.01.067 and 31.01.01.233, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission’s Rules of
Procedure No. 67 – Information Exempt from Public Review, and further subject
to the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) executed in this proceeding.

Recordholder: Matt Murray

Sponsor: Brad Richards