20240816Application (Redacted).pdf

RECEIVED
Friday, August 16, 2024
IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
_ ROCKY MOUNTAIN 1407 W.North Temple,Suite 330
POWER. Salt Lake City,UT 84116
A DIVISION OF PACIFICORP
August 16, 2024
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
11331 W. Chinden Blvd.
Building 8 Suit 201A
Boise, ID 83714
Attn: Commission Secretary
RE: CASE NO. PAC-E-24-10
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
REQUESTING A PRUDENCY DETERMINATION ON DEMAND SIDE
MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES.
Please find enclosed for filing in the above captioned matter Rocky Mountain Power's
Application requesting an order designating its demand side management expenses as prudently
incurred for 2022 and 2023 program years.
Informal questions related to this matter may be directed to me at(801) 220-4214.
Sincerely,
—fit✓ I ��c�
Michael S. Snow
Manager, Regulatory Affairs
Enclosures

Joseph M. Dallas, (ISB# 10330)
Senior Attorney
PacifiCorp
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000
Portland, Oregon 97232
Telephone: [phone]
Email: j seph.dallasgpacificorp.com
Attorney for Rocky Mountain Power
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION )
OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER ) CASE NO. PAC-E-24-10
REQUESTING A PRUDENCY )
DETERMINATION ON DEMAND-SIDE ) APPLICATION
MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES. )
COMES NOW,Rocky Mountain Power, a division of PacifiCorp (the"Company"), in
accordance with Order No. 32788 and Rule of Procedures 052 and 201, et. seq., and hereby
respectfully applies to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission(the"Commission") for an order
designating Rocky Mountain Power's demand side management ("DSM") expenditures
utilizing collections from Schedule 191 for program years 2022 and 2023 in the amount of
$9,102,982 as prudently incurred("Application").
In support of this Application, Rocky Mountain Power states as follows:
1. Rocky Mountain Power is authorized to do and is doing business in the state of
Idaho as a public utility providing retail electric service to approximately 91,000 customers.
Rocky Mountain Power is a public utility subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission
pursuant to Idaho Code § 61-129.
APPLICATION OF Page 1
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

2. The Company presents the 2022 and 2023 annual energy efficiency and peak
reduction reports ("Annual Reports"),' results of program cost effective analyses,' and third-
party program evaluations.3
BACKGROUND
3. The Company has offered a variety of DSM programs to its customers since the
1970s. All of the DSM programs offered by Rocky Mountain Power in Idaho have been
designed to be cost effective. On March 2, 2006, the Commission approved an enhanced set
of DSM programs and cost recovery of them through the Customer Efficiency Services Rate
Adjustment("Schedule 191"), which was applied to customers' bills beginning May 1, 2006.
4. This Application and the 2022 and 2023 Annual Reports are consistent with the
Memorandum of Understanding the Company entered into in Case No. GNR-E-12-01, and
approved by Order No. 32788 ("MOU"). Pursuant to this MOU, Rocky Mountain Power filed
energy efficiency and peak reduction reports with the Commission for program years 2022 and
2023 under Case No. PAC-E-05-10. These reports follow the format set forth in the MOU and
evaluate DSM program performance, including expenditures, savings, and cost effectiveness.
5. During 2022 and 2023, the Company's DSM portfolio, funded through
Schedule 191, consisted of four energy efficiency programs and two load management
programs, excluding Irrigation Load Control. These programs offered incentives for a wide
variety of energy efficiency measures to the Company's residential, business and agricultural
1 The 2022 and 2023 Annual Reports were filed with the Commission on April 28, 2023, and May 15, 2024,
respectively,are available on the Commission's website under Case No.PAC-E-05-10.
2 See Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B of the 2022 and 2023 Annual Reports.
3 Published program evaluations are available under the"Reports and Program Evaluations by State"section of
the Company's website at the following URL:
hiips://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.html.
APPLICATION OF Page 2
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

customers, as well as incentives for participating in load management events. The Company
continues to work with customers and the Commission to provide a comprehensive suite of
DSM programs that provide the greatest opportunity for participation by all customer sectors.
6. DSM programs offered by the Company provide a wide range of services and
financial incentives to assist customers with energy efficiency projects they wish to pursue.
During the 2022-2023 period, the Company administered the following programs funded
through Schedule 191:
Energy Efficiency Programs:
• Schedule 21 —Low Income Weatherization/Low Income Education("LIW")
• Schedule 118—Residential Energy Efficiency("Wattsmart Homes")
• Schedule 140—Non-Residential Energy Efficiency("Wattsmart Business")
• Home Energy Reports ("HER") - not tariffed
Load Management Programs:
• Schedule 114—Wattsmart Battery Demand Response
• Schedule 114—Commercial and Industrial Demand Response
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
7. The Company requests a Commission determination that the DSM expenditures
utilizing collections from Schedule 191 totaling $9,102,982, which represents $4,194,713 for
2022 and $4,908,269 for 2023, were prudent and in the public interest. The expenditures
submitted in this Application represent the activities that took place during program years 2022
and 2023 through a year-end cost true-up process,and excludes the Company's Irrigation Load
Control("ILC")program expenditures given that ILC program expenditures are not recovered
through Schedule 191.
8. The Company reports its Schedule 191 balancing account quarterly to
Commission Staff. For added convenience, the 2022 and 2023 balancing account activity is
provided in Tables 1 and 2 below.
APPLICATION OF Page 3
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

Table 1 —2022 Schedule 191 Balancing Account Activity
Monthly Monthly net Cash Basis Accrual Basis
Program
Month Accrued Rate Recovery CarryingAccumulated Accumulated
Costs—Fixed Costs Charge Balance Balance
Assets
Dec-21 $(524,625.27) $(180,721.23)
Jan-22 $327,923.72 $14,044.29 $(319,840.29) $(434.00) $(516,975.84) $(159,027.51)
Feb-22 $336,012.49 $(93,313.90) $(321,764.98) $(425.00) $(503,153.33) $(238,518.90)
Mar-22 $300,307.84 $20,670.41 $(311,828.19) $(424.00) $(515,097.68) $(229,792.84)
Apr-22 $264,066.95 $(14,539.92) $(274,750.24) $(434.00) $(526,214.97) $(255,450.05)
May-22 $244,838.29 $(25,842.19) $(301,291.34) $(462.00) $(583,130.02) $(338,207.29)
Jun-22 $484,327.85 $(9,874.01) $(473,610.69) $(481.00) $(572,893.86) $(337,845.14)
Jul-22 $159,101.61 $227,719.21 $(745,493.57) $(722.00) $(1,160,007.82) $(697,239.89)
Aug-22 $375,877.06 $(225,052.17) $(669,823.93) $(1,089.00) $(1,455,043.69) $(1,217,327.93)
Sep-22 $146,416.71 $201,211.43 $(576,706.31) $(1,392.00) $(1,886,725.29) $(1,447,798.10)
Oct-22 $551,233.72 $(183,570.21) $(369,081.95) $(1,496.00) $(1,706,069.52) $(1,450,712.54)
Nov-22 $515,336.99 $477,049.97 $(361,834.60) $(1,358.00) $(1,553,925.13) $(821,518.18)
Dec-22 $508,879.63 $(456,373.76) $(439,466.49) $(1,266.00) $(1,485,777.99) h$,(1,209,744.80)
2022 Totals $4,214,322.86 $(67,870.85) $(5,165,492.58) $(9,983.00)
Table 2 —2023 Schedule 191 Balancing Account Activity
Monthly Monthly net Carrying Cash Basis Accrual Basis
Month Program Costs Charge Rate Recovery Accumulated Accumulated
—Fixed Assets Accrued Costs e Balance Balance
Dec-22 $(1,485,777.99) $(1,209,744.80)
Jan-23 $335,845.03 $(4,944.28) $(417,659.96) $(2,544.00) $(1,570,136.92) $(1,299,048.01)
Feb-23 $92,196.00 $35,678.27 $(405,668.81) $(2,878.00) $(1,886,487.73) $(1,579,720.55)
Mar-23 $431,167.03 $119,098.01 $(372,821.15) $(3,096.00) $(1,831,237.85) $(1,405,372.66)
Apr-23 $360,315.59 $(171,487.46) $(339,269.32) $(3,035.00) $(1,813,226.58) $(1,558,848.85)
May-23 $438,700.25 $22,094.16 $(308,458.54) $(2,914.00) $(1,685,898.87) $(1,409,426.98)
Jun-23 $454,837.16 $(36,360.24) $(462,821.89) $(2,816.00) $(1,696,699.60) $(1,456,587.95)
Jul-23 $276,886.70 $334,724.91 $(825,080.60) $(3,285.00) $(2,248,178.50) $(1,673,341.94)
Aug-23 $426,287.69 $(434,239.03) $(746,797.02) $(4,014.00) $(2,572,701.83) $(2,432,104.30)
Sep-23 $319,894.62 $177,074.12 $(565,638.92) $(4,493.00) $(2,822,939.13) $(2,505,267.48)
Oct-23 $967,383.70 $(161,590.21) $(387,635.28) $(4,222.00) $(2,247,412.71) $(2,091,331.27)
Nov-23 $313,990.72 $117,417.39 $(422,979.85) $(3,837.00) $(2,360,238.84) $(2,086,740.01)
Dec-23 $359,162.87 $2,632,884.78 $(350,036.68) $(3,926.00) $(2,355,038.65) $551,344.96
2023 Totals $4,776,667.36 $2,630,350.42 $(5,604,868.02) $(41,060.00)
DSM SAVINGS AND COST EFFECTIVENESS
9. The annual energy efficiency portfolio savings achieved through the
Company's Schedule 191 DSM programs were 16,017 MWh in 2022 and 18,812 MWh for
APPLICATION OF Page 4
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

2023,measured at generation and first-year savings. The Wattsmart Battery Demand Response
program achieved 47 kW in 2022 and 619 kW in 2023. The Wattsmart Commercial and
Industrial Demand Response program was implemented in 2023, but did not have any called
events as the program was ramping up.
10. The Company examines its programs from all cost effective tests, including the
PacifiCorp Total Resource Cost ("PTRC"), Total Resource Cost ("TRC"), Utility Cost Test
("UCT"), Ratepayer Impact Measure ("RIM"), and Participant Cost Test ("PCT") at the
measure category: program-level, sector-level and portfolio-level. Pursuant to Commission
Order No. 33766,issued May 18,2017,the Company uses the UCT as the primary determinant
for cost effectiveness. However,the Low Income Weatherization program still uses the PTRC
test authorized by Commission Order No. 32788, issued April 12, 2013.
11. In 2022 and 2023, the energy efficiency portfolio as a whole was cost effective
from the UCT perspective. Tables 3 and 4 below summarize the cost effective results from the
2022-2023 period. As avoided costs are considered proprietary, the cost effectiveness results
for load control programs are provided with a "pass" designation, which equates to a benefit
to cost ratio of 1.0 or better. Additional cost effectiveness details for the Company's DSM
programs can be found in Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to the 2022 and 2023
Annual Reports.
Table 3 —2022 Cost Effectiveness Results
Program Benefit/Cost Test
PTRC C UCT PCT RIM
Irrigation Load Control Program PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Battery Control Program (20-year NPV) PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Energy Efficiency Portfolio 1.07 0.97 1.31 3.19 0.42
Energy Efficiency Portfolio(exc. LIW) 1.07 0.97 1.35 3.27 0.43
Wattsmart Business 1.14 1.03 1.19 2.83 0.47
Residential Energy Efficiency Portfolio(inc. NEI) 1.21 1.11 1.36 4.31 0.36
Residential Energy Efficiency Portfolio(exc. NEI) 1.10 1.00 1.36 4.26 0.36
APPLICATION OF Page 5
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

Low Income Weatherization 0.95 0.93 0.20 1.30 0.16
Home Energy Reporting 4.02 3.65 3.65 n/a ?.58
Wattsmart Homes 1.03 0.94 1.32 4.15 .34
Table 4-2023 Cost Effectiveness Results
ir Program Benefit/Cost Test
PTRC TRC UCT PCT RIM
Irrigation Load Control Program PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Battery Control Program (20-year NPV) PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Energy Efficiency Portfolio 0.97 0.88 1.31 2.60 0.42
Energy Efficiency Portfolio(exc. LIW) 0.98 0.89 1.43 2.55 0.43
Wattsmart Business 1.09 0.99 1.72 2.45 0.47
Residential Energy Efficiency Portfolio(inc. NEI) 1.43 1.36 0.73 4.37 0.30
Residential Energy Efficiency Portfolio(exc. NEI) 0.77 0.70 0.73 3.39 3.39
Low Income Weatherization(inc. NEI) 6.79 6.75 0.17 11.88 0.13
Home Energy Reporting 6.32 5.75 5.75 n/a 0.55
Wattsmart Homes 0.54 0.49 0.68 2.31 0.27
As reflected above,the Low Income Weatherization program did not pass the PTRC in
2022, but did pass the PTRC in 2023. As reflected in Table 4, the Wattsmart Homes program
received a UCT result of 0.68 for 2023. The majority of the savings achieved in 2023 came
through the transportation measure category,which is exclusively engine block heater controls.
Poor realization rates in this measure category are the primary driver to the low overall cost
benefit results in the 2023 Wattsmart Homes Program. The engine block heater control
measure was evaluated in 2023 and measure updates took place in early 2024. The program is
also working to diversify participation throughout the measure categories, specifically HVAC
and Whole Building, to improve cost effectiveness results.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY TARGETS
12. Table 5 below is a comparison of the Company's energy efficiency portfolio
performance with the achievable technical potential identified in the Company's conservation
potential assessment ("CPA") and the IRP selections over the 2022-2023 period. Consistent
with the Northwest Power and Conservation Council's regional power plans, the Company's
APPLICATION OF Page 6
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

CPA uses acquisition ramp rates and assumes that 85 percent of the technical potential is
achievable over 20 years to account for real world constraints affecting the acquisition of
energy efficiency resources. Absent the achievability assumption and ramp rates, all
discretionary resources (those that can technically be acquired at any time)would be available
at the start of the planning period, which is unrealistic from both a planning and acquisition
standpoint.
Table 5—Energy Efficiency, Achievable Technical Potential, & IRP Selections
Source of Savings" Idaho MWh Savings atgenerator)
2022 2023 2022-2023 Total
Achievable Technical Potential 47,484 70,310 117,794
Integrated Resource Plan Selections 12,824 12,000 24,824
Energy Efficiency Portfolio Performance 10,544 12,528 23,072
(excluding Home Energy Reports)
Energy Efficiency Portfolio Performance 16,017 18,812 34,829
(including Home Energy Reports)
13. As shown in Table 5, from 2022 through 2023 the Company achieved 23,072
MWh of energy efficiency savings in Idaho, excluding savings from Home Energy Reports,
equating to 93 percent of the 24,824 MWh selected by the IRP. IRP savings are based on
assumed typical acquisition rates,whereas actual program performance can fluctuate from year
to year based on factors such as economic conditions and the timing of large project
completions.
LOW INCOME AUDITS
14. The Company's Low Income Energy Conservation Education program is
administered by two partner agencies, Eastern Idaho Community Action Partnership
("EICAP")and Southeastern Idaho Community Action Agency("SEICAA").Due to reporting
4 Achievable Technical Potential and IRP selections are from the 2019/2021 DSM Potential Study and 2019/2021
IRP Update.
APPLICATION OF Page 7
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

discrepancies for program expenditures and energy savings kit inventory for years 2020-2021,
and pursuant to Order No. 35814 issued May 13, 2023 in Case No. PAC-E-22-12, the
Commission directed the Company to conduct in-house audits of EICAP and SEICAA, and
discuss the findings in its next prudency filing. Accordingly, The Company's Low Income
Program Manager conducted in-house audits in the fall of 2023. The visits occurred
September 27, 2023 with EICAP, and September 28, 2023 with SEICAA. The audits focused
on review of existing tracking mechanisms, kits inventory verification, and the development
and/or improvement of tracking mechanisms.
15. At the time of the audits, both agencies had exhausted energy savings kit
inventory and were in the process of ordering or awaiting shipment of new kits. EICAP had an
established tracking report in their database for kits and expenditures,which has been in place
for several years. EICAP's in-house audit did not disclose any findings requiring corrective
action. Due to personnel changes and the departure of staff overseeing the conservation
education program, SEICAA's in-audit was inconclusive. SIECAA researched through
available tracking records in an attempt to reconcile kit inventory,however due to a lack of kit
inventory tracking records for the years 2020 through 2022 to validate inventory counts, a
completed reconciliation was impracticable. SEICAA confirmed there were nine remaining
kits at the end of 2022 calendar year and kits were distributed prior to the in-house audit in fall
2023. The funding balance and expenditures were reconciled.
16. The Company used the in-house audits to work closely with EICAP and
SIECAA to establish a uniform tracking mechanism to be utilized by both agencies for ongoing
program tracking and reporting. Also, to monitor funding and kits inventory closely, agencies
will provide quarterly program reports versus annual reports in 2024, with reporting cadence
APPLICATION OF Page 8
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

re-evaluated at the end of 2024 calendar year. A Low Income Conservation Education Report
for Calendar Year 2020 through the first quarter of 2024 was provided as Appendix F to the
2023 Annual Report.
REVISED 2022 ANNUAL REPORT
17. Attached to this Application as Exhibit A is a Revised 2022 Annual Report. The
Company's previously submitted 2022 Annual Report inadvertently excluded savings and
expenditure details for the Irrigation Load Control and Wattsmart Battery programs in
Table 3. The Revised 2022 Annual Report includes these details. The Revised 2022 Annual
Report also includes additional details for the Wattsmart Battery program in Table 11, and
added a program evaluation section at the end. No changes were made to the 2022 Annual
Report Appendices,but are included with the Revised 2022 Report for convenience.
PROGRAM EVALUATIONS
18. Evaluations are conducted using best-practice approaches and techniques
including those outlined in the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Program Impact
Evaluation and the California Evaluation Framework guides. The Company conducts process
and/or impact evaluations to ensure the ongoing cost effective of its energy efficiency
programs through validation of energy savings and to provide information to assist in program
management.
19. Process evaluations assess program delivery,from design to implementation,in
order to identify efficiencies, including identifying what worked, what did not work,
constraints, and potential improvements. Identifying opportunities for improvement is
essential to making corrections along the way.
APPLICATION OF Page 9
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

20. Impact evaluations determine the impacts(e.g.energy and demand savings)that
directly result from a program. They also support analyses of cost effectiveness aimed at
identifying relative program costs and benefits.
21. Evaluations are based on credible and transparent methods focused on
successfully capturing the savings created by the programs. Evaluations develop retrospective
estimates of energy savings attributable to a program. While retrospective in nature, the
information obtained will be used to inform future potential assessments, plans, forecasts and
targets.
22. Process and impact evaluations for the Wattsmart Business 2020-2021, Home
Energy Reports 2020-2021, and Low Income Weatherization 2018-2019 programs were
published during the 2022-2023 prudency timeframe and included in the 2022 and 2023
Annual Reports.5
MODIFIED PROCEDURE
23. The Company believes that consideration of the proposals contained in this
Application do not require an evidentiary proceeding, and accordingly requests that this
Application be processed under modified procedure pursuant to RP 201-204,which allows for
consideration of these issues by written submissions rather than by an evidentiary hearing. If,
however,the Commission determines that an evidentiary proceeding is required,the Company
stands ready to provide supporting testimony.
5 See Tables 13 and 14 from the 2022 and 2023 Annual Reports,respectively.
APPLICATION OF Page 10
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

COMMUNICATIONS AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS
24. Communications regarding this Application should be addressed to:
Mark Alder
Michael Snow
1407 W.North Temple, Suite 330
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Telephone: [phone]
[phone]
Email: mark.alder(a�pacificorp.com
michael.snowkpacificorp.com
Joseph Dallas
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000
Portland, Oregon 97232
Telephone: [phone]
Email:joseph.dallaskpacificorp.com
In addition, the Company respectfully requests that all data requests regarding this matter be
addressed to one or more of the following:
By e-mail (preferred) datarequest(&,pacificorp.com
By regular mail Data Request Response Center
PacifiCorp
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000
Portland, OR 97232
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
25. This filing, specifically Appendices B and C to the 2022 Revised Annual
Report, contain confidential information including trade secret and other Company
confidential information exempt from public review under Idaho Code §§ 74-104-109 and
Idaho Public Utilities commission's Rule of Procedure 67.
APPLICATION OF Page 11
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

REQUEST FOR RELIEF
26. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above Rocky Mountain Power
respectfully requests that the Commission approve this Application by: (1) issuing an order
authorizing that this matter be processed by Modified Procedure; and (2) issuing a final order
designating Rocky Mountain Power's 2022 and 2023 total DSM expenditures of$9,102,982
as prudently incurred.
DATED this 16th day of August 2024.
Respectfully submitted,
By v °`
Joseph M. Dallas
Senior Attorney
PacifiCorp
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000
Portland, Oregon 97232
Telephone: [phone]
Email: joseph.dallas(&,pacificorp.com
Attorney for Rocky Mountain Power
APPLICATION OF Page 12
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

EXHIBIT A

_ ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER
POWERING YOUR GREATNESS
r
2022 IDAHO Energy Efficiency and Peak
Reduction Annual Report
Issued 51112023
Updated August 2024
Rocky Mountain Power
1407 West North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management
Page 1 of 19

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.................................................................................................................................3
REGULATORY ACTIVITIES.............................................................................................................................4
MEETINGS WITH COMMISSION STAFF........................................................................................................5
PORTFOLIO OF PROGRAMS .........................................................................................................................6
ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS.................................................................................................................6
WATTSMART HOMES................................................................................................................................. 6
HOME ENERGY REPORTS PROGRAM .............................................................................................................. 7
LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION ................................................................................................................... 8
WATTSMART BUSINESS PROGRAM...........................................................................................................10
WATTSMART BUSINESS.................................................................................................................................10
PEAK REDUCTION PROGRAMS...................................................................................................................12
IRRIGATION LOAD CONTROL.....................................................................................................................12
WATTSMART BATTERIES...............................................................................................................................13
EXPENDITURES ...........................................................................................................................................14
TOTAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY PORTFOLIO SAVINGS AND EXPENDITURES ..........................................................14
GROSS SAVINGS BY MEASURE CATEGORY................................................................................................14
LOAD CONTROL EVENTS.............................................................................................................................16
COST EFFECTIVENESS..................................................................................................................................17
TOTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS BY PORTFOLIO AND PROGRAM...........................................................17
Page 2of19

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Rocky Mountain Power is a multi-jurisdictional electric utility providing retail service to
customers in Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming. Rocky Mountain Power, a division of PacifiCorp, serves
approximately 86,874 customers in southeastern Idaho. Rocky Mountain Power acquires energy
efficiency and peak reduction resources as cost-effective alternatives to the acquisition of supply-
side resources.
PacifiCorp develops an integrated resource plan (IRP)l as a means of balancing cost, risk,
uncertainty, supply reliability/deliverability and long-run public policy goals. The IRP presents a
framework of future actions to ensure that Rocky Mountain Power continues to provide reliable,
reasonably priced service to customers. Energy Efficiency and peak management opportunities
are incorporated into the IRP based on their availability, characteristics, and costs.'
Rocky Mountain Power employs external implementers to administer its energy efficiency and
peak reductions programs.' Evaluations for each program are performed by independent
external evaluators to validate energy and demand savings derived from Rocky Mountain
Power's programs.4
Rocky Mountain Power utilizes earned media, customer communications, education, and
outreach advertising as well as program specific marketing to communicate the value of energy
efficiency, provide information regarding low-cost, no-cost energy efficiency measures and to
educate customers on the availability of programs, services, and incentives.'
This report provides details on program results and activities for the reporting period from
January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. Rocky Mountain Power on behalf of its customers,
invested $4.19 million in energy efficiency and peak reduction resource acquisitions during the
reporting period utilizing collections from Electric Service Schedule 191, Customer Efficiency
Services Rate Adjustment ("Schedule 191"). The investment yielded approximately 16 megawatt
hours ("MWh")at generator in first-year energy savings,and approximately 3 megawatts(UMW")
of capacity reduction from energy efficiency. Net benefits based on the projected value of the
energy savings over the life of the individual measures is estimated at $1.4 million.'
1 Information on PacifiCorp's IRP can be found at https://www.pacificorp.com/energy/integrated-resource-
plan.html.
Z Information on PacifiCorp's planning process can be found at https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-
side-management.html under the"Rocky Mountain Power planning"section.
3 Information on program administration can be found at https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-
management.html under the"Program administration"section.
4 Information on program evaluations can be found at https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-
management.html under the"Reports and program evaluations by state"section.
S Information on communications and outreach can be found at https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-
side-management.html under the"Communications and outreach"section.
6 See cost effectiveness Appendix A, UCT Net Benefits exc. LIM
Page 3of19

The energy efficiency portfolio was cost effective based on the Utility Cost Test (UCT), which is
the primary cost benefit test observed in Idaho. Cost-effectiveness results are provided in Table
12 and Appendix A.
In 2022, Rocky Mountain Power's DSM portfolio included the following programs:
• Energy Efficiency Programs:
■ Wattsmart Homes
■ Home Energy Reports
■ Low Income Weatherization
■ Wattsmart Business
■ Peak Reduction Program:
■ Irrigation Load Control
■ Wattsmart Batteries
Pursuant to Commission Order No. 32196, the Idaho Irrigation Load Control Program is treated
as a system power supply with expenses flowing through base rates in lieu of the Schedule 191
DSM tariff rider. Notwithstanding, information on the Irrigation Load Control Program is provided
in this report.
REGULATORY ACTIVITIES
During the 2022 reporting period, the Company filed compliance and/or informational reports,
updates, notices, and requests with the Commission in support of Company DSM programs. The
following is a list of those activities:
• On January 6, 2022,the Company filed its reply comments in the matter of the Company's
application for authority to implement a battery demand response program, Case No.
PAC-E-21-16. The Commission issued Order No. 35370 approving the Company's
application on April 14, 2022.
• On January 24, 2022, the Company filed an application for authority to revert the Blue-
Sky block value to 100 kilowatt hours from 200 kilowatt hours in Case No. PAC-E-22-02.
The Commission issued Order No. 35362 approving the Company's application on
April 1, 2022.
• On January 24, 2022, the Company filed an application for authority to increase Electric
Service Schedule 191 — Customer Efficiency Services Rate in Case No. PAC-E-22-03. The
Commission issued Order No. 35363 rejecting the Company's application on April 1, 2022.
• On January 24, 2022, consistent with the flexible tariff process, a 45-day notice of changes
was posted to the Company website. Changes consisted of adjustments to incentives for
heat pumps, HVAC, and engine block heater control offerings.
• On February 3, 2022, the Company circulated the DSM balancing account report for the
fourth quarter of 2021.
Page 4 of 19

• On April 22, 2022, the Company submitted a compliance filing in the matter of the
Company's application for authority to implement a battery demand response program,
Case No. PAC-E-21-16.
• On April 27, 2022,the Company submitted a second compliance filing in the matter of the
Company's application for authority to implement a battery demand response program,
Case No. PAC-E-21-16.
• On May 2, 2022, pursuant to Order No. 29976, the Company submitted its $.4M Idaho
Energy Efficiency and Peak Reduction Annual Report in Case No. PAC-E-05-10.
• On May 3, 2022, the Company circulated the DSM balancing account report for the first
quarter of 2022.
• On July 8, 2022,the Company filed an application for authority to increase Electric Service
Schedule 191 — Customer Efficiency Services Rate in Case No. PAC-E-22-10. The
Commission issued Order No. 35546 approving the Company's application on
September 29, 2022.
• On August 2, 2022, the Company circulated the DSM balancing account report for the
second quarter of 2022.
• On August 17, 2022, the Company filed an application requesting a prudency
determination on DSM expenditures for years 2020-2021 in Case No. PAC-E-22-12.
• On August 25, 2022,the Company filed an application in Case No. PAC-E-22-13 requesting
authority to implement a commercial and industrial demand response program.
• On November 11, 2022, the Company circulated the DSM balancing account report for
the third quarter of 2022.
• On December 21, 2022, the Company circulated its 2023 communications plans with
Commission Staff.
MEETINGS WITH COMMISSION STAFF
The Company consulted with Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff throughout 2022, with formal
presentations on the following matters:
June 7, 2022
• Discussed the Company's 2021 Idaho Energy Efficiency and Peak Reduction Annual Report.
• Reviewed the 2022 Year-to-Date Status and forecast.
• Reviewed the status of the Schedule 191 balancing account.
• Discussed the Company's Wattsmart Business Demand Response Application; and
• Discussed the new battery demand response program tracking and reporting metrics.
Page 5of19

PORTFOLIO OF PROGRAMS
ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS
WATTSMART HOMES
Program Description
The Wattsmart Homes program is designed to provide access to incentives for using more
efficient products and services installed or received by residential customers in the following
housing types:
■ New Construction Homes
■ Single Family Existing Homes
■ Multi-family Housing Units
■ Manufactured Homes
The program applies to residential customers under Electrical Service Schedules 1 or 36.
Landlords who own rental property where the tenant is billed under Electric Service Schedules 1
or 36 also qualify.
The Wattsmart Homes program passed the UCT cost tests with a benefit cost ratio of 1.32 for
2022.
Program Performance and Major Achievements in 2022
■ The Wattsmart Homes program generated 2,728,468 kWh savings at the site.
■ Disbursed $233,033 in incentives.
■ The program updated offerings for central air conditioners, smart thermostats,
evaporative coolers,ductless heat pumps,air source heat pumps, and engine block heater
controls homes.
■ The program also discontinued Wattsmart starter kits.
Additional information on the program administration can be found on the Company's website
under the Program administration section:
https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.html
Direct Link to Wattsmart Homes program administration:
https://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pacificorp/environment/dsm/idaho/ld
aho Program Administration Wattsmart Homes 22.pdf
Page 6of19

HOME ENERGY REPORTS PROGRAM
Program Description
The Home Energy Reports program is a behavioral program designed to decrease participant
energy usage by providing comparative energy usage data for similar homes located in the same
geographical area. Additionally, the report provides the participants with tips to decrease their
energy usage.
The Home Energy Reports program passed the UCT with a cost benefit ratio of 3.65 for 2022.
Program Performance and Major Achievements in 2022
■ Total savings for 2022 in MWh was 5,018, which equates to 5,018,450 in kWh savings.
■ In 2022 reports were initially provided to approximately 28,000, which was expanded to
41,000 customers in July 2022.
■ Report highlights
o Individual recommendations to save energy
o Insights on how customers are using energy by appliance type
o Home characteristics included in report with easy access to update home profile
o Monthly usage history included in reports
■ Online portal was improved to provide greater insights for all residential customers.
■ In 2022, only 0.29% of customers (190 customers) have requested to be removed from
the program.
Additional information on the program administration can be found on the Company's website
under the Program administration section:
https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.html
Direct Link to Home Energy Reports program administration:
https://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pacificorp/environment/dsm/idaho/ld
aho Program Administration Home Energy Reports 22.pdf
Page 7 of 3.9

LOW INCOME WEATHERIZATION
Program Description
The Low-Income Weatherization program provides energy efficiency services through a
partnership between the Company and local non-profit agencies to residential customers who
meet the income-eligible guidelines.Services are provided at no cost to the program participants.
The Company contracts with Eastern Idaho Community Action Partnership, Inc. ("EICAP") and
Southeastern Idaho Community Action Agency ("SEICAA") to provide services. The two agencies
receive federal funds allocated to and administered by the Idaho Department of Health and
Welfare ("IDHW"). Energy efficiency measures are installed in the homes of income eligible
households throughout the Company's service territory by EICAP and SEICAA. The Company is
required to fund 85 percent of the cost of approved measures, pursuant to Commission Order
No. 32151. Under Advice No. 19-01 filed with Idaho Public Utilities Commission on January 16,
2019, Commission approved reimbursement of up to 100% of related installed costs of ductless
heat pumps, effective March 6, 2019. Agencies cover remaining costs with the funding received
by IDHW.
The Low-Income Weatherization program did not pass the PTRC with a cost benefit ratio of 0.9S
for 2022. Under direction of Case No. GNR-E12-01, Low Income Weatherization program uses
the 10 percent conservation adder to the total resource cost test as its primary cost test. Cost-
effectiveness was partially affected by the use a single-family heat pump load profile in lieu of a
single-family cooling load profile to value the timing of energy savings.Several measures installed
through the program save energy throughout the year and not just the summer months,
therefore a heat pump load profile was selected to reflect energy savings in non-summer months.
Program Performance and Major Achievements in 2022
■ In 2022, the program achieved savings at site of 31,995
■ Number of homes served 27
Low Income Energy Conservation Education
Commission Order No. 32788 authorized the Company to fund the Low-Income Energy
Conservation Education with $25,000 annually. These education services are provided by EICAP
and SEICAA and target participants who receive Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program
("LIHEAP") funds. EICAP received $16,000 program year ("PY") 2022 funding by the beginning of
their 2022/2023 LIHEAP program year. SEICAA did not request funds in 2022 as they had funds
from PY 2019 and PY 2021 to spend. SEICAA did not purchase kits as they had inventory of kits
purchased in 2019 to distribute. COVID-19 restrictions in operations slowed the distribution of
kits in PY 2020 and PY 2021 and increased in PY 2022
Page 8 of 19

The agencies provided a conservation education curriculum to households and reported the
following activities and program specifics for 2022 in Table 1 below.
Table 1
2022 Conservation Education Activities
EICAP SEICAA
Annual Funds $ 16,000.00 $ 0.00
Expenditures $ 21,674.71 $ 0.00
Balance as of 12/31/22 $ 30,194.04 $ 20,250.00
Households Served 608 45
Distribution
EICAP purchased 500 kits using PY 2022 funds. The new kits include two 9W LED bulbs, a LED
night light, a window insulation kit, a wall plate thermometer, a refrigerator thermometer, a
freezer thermometer, five foam light switch sealing gaskets, five foam electrical outlet sealing
gaskets, a furnace whistle, one 2pk wool dyer balls, a faucet aerator, and one shower timer As
of December 31, 2022, EICAP has 610 kits in their inventory.
EICAP's program objective was to educate Rocky Mountain Power customers on how to conserve
energy through useful tips and tools to help them save year-round. They served Rocky Mountain
Power households that received energy assistance and/or requested energy conservation
education.
SEICAA did not purchase kits in PY2022 and intends to utilize remaining PY2019 funds
combined with the PY2020 and PY2021 funding to purchase new kits as well as reserve some of
the funds for postage and professional fees.
Table 2 below provides information regarding the education offered by the agencies.
Table 2
Additional Information on Conservation Education by Agencies
EICAP SEICAA
Program Design Educate Rocky Mountain Power Reduce electricity usage and
customers about how to monthly bills for participants of
conserve energy. the LIHEAP program.
Target Audience Rocky Mountain Power LIHEAP recipients who have not
customers who receive Low received weatherization program
Income Home Energy Assistance services as a priority. Households
Heat (LIHEAP) Heat and Crisis . can also be identified through
SEICAA's other programs.
Page 9of19

EICAP SEICAA
How Company Funds used to purchase energy Plan to utilize funds to purchase
Funds Were Used efficiency kits in August 2022 and kits in PY 2023 and for shipping
for shipping of kits. of kits.
Additional information on the program administration can be found on the Company's website
under the Program administration section:
https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.html
Direct Link to Low Income Weatherization program administration:
https://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pacificorp/environment/dsm/idaho/ld
aho Program Administration Low Income 22.pdf
WATTSMART BUSINESS PROGRAM
WATTSMART BUSINESS
Program Description
The commercial, industrial, and agricultural energy efficiency program portfolio is offered
through a single Non-Residential Energy Efficiency program called Wattsmart Business.
Wattsmart Business is designed to influence new and existing non-residential customers to
increase the efficiency of electric energy usage both through the installation of efficient
equipment as well as adoption of improved energy management protocols. Qualifying measures
include those which produce verifiable electric energy efficiency improvements compared to an
established baseline.
Wattsmart Business offerings include:
■ Typical Upgrades
■ Midstream/Instant incentives
■ Custom Analysis
■ Energy Management
■ Energy Project Manager Co-funding
The Wattsmart Business program passed the UCT with a cost benefit analysis of 1.49.
Page 10 of 19

Program Performance and Major Achievements in 2022
■ In 2022, the program achieved gross energy savings at site of 6,940,859 kWh.
■ Distributed incentives of$863,132.
■ To foster continued growth and utilization of the Wattsmart Business Vendor Network
(WBVN) and to increase customer satisfaction,the Company continued to employ full-
time outreach specialist dedicated to Idaho. This staff member provides an outreach
and support role to both vendors and customers interested in lighting as well as non-
lighting incentives.
■ In 2022, participating WBVN vendors continued receiving quarterly vendor
performance scorecards to provide timely feedback and encourage vendors to strive
to reach "Premium" status, which entitles qualifying vendors to improved visibility
and enhanced co-branding with Rocky Mountain Power. In 2022, there were three
premium status Wattsmart Business Vendors.
■ Several challenges presented themselves in 2022 leading to lower savings in the
Wattsmart Business Program than in years past.
o Significant supply chain disruptions had a negative effect on program energy
savings achievements.
o Due to supply timelines and project lifecycles, there were no large energy
savings projects completed in CY 2022 by the largest industrial customers
within the utility service territory. The Company expects this to be rectified in
2023 through focused outreach efforts began in 2022.
Additional information on the program administration can be found on the Company's website
under the Program administration section:
https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.htmI
Direct Link to Wattsmart Business program administration:
https://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pacificorp/environment/dsm/idaho/ld
aho Program Administration NonResidential 22.pdf
Page 11 of 19

PEAK REDUCTION PROGRAMS
IRRIGATION LOAD CONTROL
Program Description
The irrigation load control program is offered to irrigation customers receiving electric service on
Schedule 10, Irrigation and Soil Drainage Pumping Power Service. Participants enroll in the
program with a third-party administrator and allow the curtailment of their electricity usage in
exchange for an incentive. Customer incentives are based on the site's average available load
during load control program hours, adjusted by optouts or non-participation.
For most participants, their irrigation pumps are set up with a dispatchable two-way control
system giving Rocky Mountain Power control over their loads. Participants are notified four
hours ahead of control events and have the choice to opt-out of a limited number of dispatch
events per season.
The Irrigation Load control program passed the UCT cost test for 2022.
Program Performance and Major Achievements in 2022
■ There were 17 load control events initiated in 2022. There were 8 mandatory and 9
voluntary events.
■ The available load from the Irrigation Program can be utilized as reserves which provides
value to the program and benefits the customer.
■ Customers were given a 20% incentive bonus for participation in general.
■ Total customers participating in the program are 154, participation sites 1,091.
■ Total enrolled MW (Gross -at Gen) in 2022 is 169, maximum realized MW (at Gen) is 137.
Additional information on the program administration can be found on the Company's website
under the Program administration section:
https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.html
Direct Link to Irrigation Load Control program administration:
https://www.pacificorp.com/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pacificorp/environment/dsm/idaho/ld
aho Program Administration Irrigation Load Control 22.pdf
Page 12 of 19

WATTSMART BATTERIES
Program Performance and Major Achievements in 2022
• Rocky Mountain Power called upon the batteries for a total of 40 minutes which equates
to less than one battery cycle being used by Rocky Mountain Power during 2022.
• All customer batteries enrolled in the program prior to the called events responded.
There were no battery communication failures.
• New customer enrollment with batteries and new solar only installs during the same
period
• No commercial batteries were enrolled in the program during 2022.
• During 2022 there were 486 new customers interconnected with solar with seven
customers completing the enrollment process into the Wattsmart Battery Program. The
enrollment application for customer generation versus the enrollment in Wattsmart
Batteries is a separate unique process. It is expected many of the solar enrollments will
eventually enroll in the battery program.
Program Description
The Wattsmart Batteries program promotes and incentivizes the installation of qualified
individual batteries for system-wide integration and use for overall electric grid management.
Leveraging batteries has created an opportunity to maximize renewable energy for advancing a
sustainable electric grid. The batteries may be used for frequency response, peak load
management, transmission relief, daily load cycling, and other smart grid applications.
Batteries participating in the Wattsmart Battery Program are integrated within PacifiCorp's
Energy Management System to provide real-time grid benefits
Eligible customers who participate in the program receive an enrollment incentive based on the
kW size of their battery and participation commitment, and ongoing annual incentives for
continued participation.
The battery program passed the UCT test using a 20-year NPV because the net benefits exceeded
the program costs, however, did not pass using the 1-year NPV. This is primarily due to the
program having high upfront incentives and limited participation during the first year of the
program.
Program enrollment information can be found on the Company's website:
www.rockymountainpower.net/battery
Page 13 of 19

EXPENDITURES
TOTAL PORTFOLIO SAVINGS AND EXPENDITURES
Table 3
Program Results for January 1,2022—December 31, 20227
Load Management Programs kW/Yr.Savings kW/Yr.Savings Program
(at site) (at gen) Expenditures
Irrigation Load Control 125,370 136,718 $ 3,602,414
Wattsmart Batteries 43 47 $ 43,030
Total Load Management 125,413 136,765 $ 3,645,444
Energy Efficiency Programs kWh/Yr.Savings kWh/Yr.Savings Program
(at site) (at gen) Expenditures
Low Income Weatherization 31,995 34,894 $ 147,975
Home Energy Reporting 5,018,450 5,473,172 $ 87,603
Wattsmart Homes 2,728,468 2,975,695 $ 808,180
Total Residential 7,778,913 8,483,761 $ 1,043,758
Total Wattsmart Business 6,940,859 7,533,097 $ 2,678,130
Total Energy Efficiency 14,719,772 16,016,858 $ 3,721,888
Other Portfolio Expenditures
Commercial&Industrial Evaluation Costs $ 160,361
Residential Evaluation Costs $ 49,508
Outreach&Communications $ 119,099
Potential Study $ 88,184
System Support $ 12,643
Total Other Portfolio Expenditures $ 429,795
Total Idaho Portfolio Expenditures $ 7,797,127
Total Idaho Portfolio Expenditures excluding Irrigation Load Control $ 4,194,713
GROSS SAVINGS BY MEASURE CATEGORY
Table 4
2022 Annual Savings by Wattsmart Homes
Measure Category Total kWh(at Site) Total Incentive Total Measure
Quantity
Appliances 2,591 $ 1,205 39
Building Shell 14,124 $ 5,505 9,520
Electronics 1,159 $ 285 34
Energy Kits 51,135 $ 2,579 408
HVAC 209,605 $ 37,713 187
Lighting 3,777 $ 611 11
Water Heating 26,359 $ 8,700 15
'The energy efficiency reported savings are gross,ex-ante. The values at generation include line losses between the
customer site and the generation source.
Page 14 of 19

Measure Category Total kWh(at Site) Total Incentive Total Measure
Quantity
Whole Building 66,610 $ 20,625 67
Transportation 2,353,107 $ 155,819 1,527
Grand Total 2,768,468 $ 233,033
Table 5
Low Income Homes Served and Measures Installed
Measure Type Installed
Air Sealed/Infiltration 24
Insulation 65
Attic Ventilation 12
Lighting CFL/LED 27
Furnace Repair or Replacement 14
Duct Sealing and/or Insulation 2
Ductless Heat Pump 0
Thermal Doors and/or Window Replacement 28
Water Heater Repair 14
Total Number of Homes Served 27
Total kWh Savings @ Site 31,995
Table 6
Wattsmart Business Savings by Sector
Sector Total kWh (at Site) Total Incentive
Commercial 4,403,907 $ 572,708
Industrial 663,671 $ 29,071
Irrigation 1,874,091 $ 261,352
Grand Total 6,940,859 $ 863,132
Table 7
2022 Annual Net Savings by Wattsmart Business
Measure Category Total kWh(at Site) Total Incentive Total
Projects
ruig Shell 11,946 $ 2,830 2
essed Air 433,569 $ 35,279 2
Management 536,431 $ 10,729 3
HVAC 912,310 $ 176,169 25
Irrigation 2,279,371 $ 302,636 146
Lighting 1,957,959 $ 245,851 276
Motors 392,413 $ 18,139 1
Refrigeration 91,384 $ 3,127 3
Wastewater 325,477 $ 48,822 1
Energy Project Manager Co-Funding - $ 19,551 1
Grand Total 6,940,859 $ 863,132 460
Page 15 of 19

LOAD CONTROL EVENTS
Table 8
Irrigation Load Control Events$
Date Event Times Estimated Load
Reduction at Gen(MW)
7/7/2022 1 7:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 136
7/8/2022 2 5:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 121
7/28/2022 3 5:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 97
7/29/2022 4 5:00 PM—8:00 PM MDT 89
8/15/2022 5 5:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 48
8/16/2022 6 7:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 61
8/17/2022 7 7:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 66
8/18/2022 8 7:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 66
8/30/2022 9 7:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 47
8/31/2022 10 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 29
9/1/2022 11 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 69
9/2/2022 12 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 66
9/3/2022 13 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 27
9/4/2022 14 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 29
9/5/2022 15 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 26
9/6/2022 16 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 56
9/7/2022 17 6:00 PM—9:00 PM MDT 60
Table 9
Irrigation Load Program Performance
Maximum Potential MW(at Site) 154
Maximum Potential MW(Gross—at Gen) 169
Average Realized Load MW(at Gen) 64
Maximum Realized Load MW(at Gen) 137
Participation Customers 154
Participation(Sites) 1,091
Table 10
Battery Control Events
Event Date Mountain Time E%m—nt 'W kW Residential or Reason for Event
Start/End Time achieved Commercial
lAugus7t22,2022 5:29 PM to 5:34 PM 11 Residential Frequency Response
gust 25,2022 4:52 PM to 4:57 PM 14 Residential Frequency Response
September 2,2022 5:08 PM to 5:13 PM 14 Residential Frequency Response
September 18,2022 12:07 PM to 12:12 PM 19 Residential Frequency Response
September 20,2022 2:25 PM to 2:30 PM 19 Residential Frequency Response
October 10,2022 9:16 AM to 9:21 AM 19 Residential Frequency Response
October 29,2022 9:24 PM to 9:29 PM 24 Residential Frequency Response
October 31,2022 9:52 PM to 9:57 PM 24 Residential Frequency Response
a(v) =voluntary events
Page 16 of 19

Table 11:
Battery Control Program Performance
Maximum Potential kW(at Site) 43
Maximum Potential kW(at Gen) 47
Total Participating Batteries 9
COST EFFECTIVENESS
—OTAL COST EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS BY PORTFOLIO AND PROGRAM
Program cost effectiveness is performed using a Company specific modeling tool, created by a
third-party consultant. The tool is designed to incorporate PacifiCorp data and values such as
avoided costs, and generally follows the methodology specified in California's Standard Practice
Manual. The analysis assesses the costs and benefits of DSM resource programs from different
stakeholder perspectives, including participants and non-participants, based on four tests
described in the Standard Practice Manual (TRC, UCT, PCT and RIM) as well as an additional fifth
test, PTRC.
Each of the cost-effectiveness tests for Rocky Mountain Power's programs is outlined below. The
primary cost/benefit test observed in Idaho is the UCT for all programs other than the Low-
Income Weatherization program, which uses the PTRC.9
• PacifiCorp Total Resource Test (PTRC) is the total resource cost test with an additional
10% added to the net benefit side of the benefit/cost formula to account for non-
quantified environmental and non-energy benefits of conservation resources over supply
side alternatives.
• Total Resource Cost (TRC) Test considers the benefits and costs from the perspective of all
utility customers, comparing the total costs and benefits from both the utility and utility customer
perspectives.
• Utility Cost (UCT) Test also called the program administrator cost test, provides a benefit
to cost perspective from the utility only. The test compares the total utility cost incurred
to the benefit/value of the energy and capacity saved and contains no customer costs or
benefits in calculation of the ratio.
• Participant Cost Test (PCT) compares the portion of the resource paid directly by
participants to the savings realized by the participants.
• Ratepayer Impact Cost Test (RIM) examines the impact of energy efficiency expenditures
on non-participating ratepayers overall. Unlike supply-side investments, energy efficiency
programs reduce energy sales. Reduced sales typically lower revenue requirements while
putting near-term upward pressure on the rates remaining fixed costs are spread over
fewer kilowatt-hours.
9 Under direction of Case No. GNR-E-12-01, Low Income Weatherizotion program uses the 10 percent energy
conservation adder to the total resource cost test.
Page 17 of 19

Table 12
2022 Cost-Effectiveness Results by Programlo
Program Benefit/Cost Test"
PTRC TRC UCT PCT RIM
Irrigation Load Control PrograM12 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Battery Control Program(20-year NPV) PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Energy Efficiency Portfolio 1.07 0.97 1.31 3.19 0.42
Energy Efficiency Portfolio(exc. LIW) 1.07 0.97 1.35 3.27 0.43
Wattsmart Business 1.14 1.03 1.19 2.83 0.47
Residential Energy Efficiency Portfolio(inc. NEI) 1.21 1.11 1.36 4.31 0.36
Residential Energy Efficiency Portfolio(exc. NEI) 1.10 1.00 1.36 4.26 0.36
Low Income Weatherization13 0.95 0.93 0.20 1.30 0.16
Home Energy Reporting 4.02 3.65 3.65 n/a 0.58
Wattsmart Homes 1.03 0.94 1.32 4.15 0.34
Portfolio-level cost effectiveness includes portfolio costs, such as the Potential Assessment and
DSM system database. Sector-level cost effectiveness, reported in the Residential and Non-
Residential sections of this report, includes sector-specific evaluation, measurement, and
verification expenditures.
The Company includes quantifiable non-energy impacts at the portfolio and residential level, as
well as the Wattsmart Homes and Low-Income Weatherization program level.
EVALUATIONS
Evaluations are performed by independent external evaluators to validate energy and demand
savings derived from the Company's energy efficiency programs. Industry best practices are
adopted by the Company with regards to principles of operation, methodologies, evaluation
methods, and protocols including those outlined in the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency
Program Impact Evaluation and the California Evaluation Framework guides.
A component of the overall evaluation efforts is aimed at the reasonable verification of
installations of energy efficient measures and associated documentation through review of
documentation, surveys and/or ongoing onsite inspections.
Verification of the potential to achieve savings involves regular inspection and commissioning of
equipment. The Company engages in programmatic verification activities, including inspections,
quality assurance reviews, and tracking checks and balances as part of routine program
10 Cost-effectiveness memo detail is provided in Appendix A.
11 The Low-Income Weatherization and Wattsmart Homes programs include non-energy impacts.
1z A"Pass" designation equates to a benefit cost ratio of 1.0 or better.
13 Low-Income Weatherization conservation education funding is excluded from the program level cost-
effectiveness testing but is included in the portfolio and residential sector cost-effectiveness.
Page 18 of 19

implementation and may rely upon these practices in the verification of installation information
for the purposes of savings verifications in advance of more formal impact evaluation results.
Evaluation, measurement,and verification tasks are segregated within the Company organization
to ensure they are performed and managed by personnel who are not directly responsible for
program management.
Information on evaluation activities completed or in progress during 2022 are summarized in the
chart below. Completed evaluation reports are available at the following link, under the "Reports
and program evaluations by state" section:
https://www.pacificorp.com/environment/demand-side-management.html
Table 13:
Evaluations Completed 2022
Evaluation Responsible Status Published
Consultant
2020 Wattsmart Business Program Evaluation Cadmus Completed 2022
Page 19 of 19

Appendix A

APPENDIX
Appendix A: Energy Efficiency Cost-effectiveness Results'
1 Cost-effectiveness results were generated by Applied Energy Group(AEG) using the approved Cost-effectiveness
methodologies.

'0AEG
APPLIED ENERGY GROUP
MEMORANDUM
To: Alesha Mander, PacifiCorp
From: Andrew Cottrell, Andy Hudson, Elizabeth Applegate, AEG
Date: April 21, 2023
Re: PacifiCorp Idaho Portfolio and Sector Level Cost-Effectiveness Results(including Low-Income) — PY2022
AEG estimated the cost-effectiveness of PacifiCorp's overall energy efficiency portfolio in the state of Idaho based
on Program Year (PY) 2022 costs and savings estimates provided by PacifiCorp. This memo provides cost-
effectiveness results at the portfolio and sector levels. The portfolio (including NEBs) passes the PacifiCorp Total
Resource Cost Test (PTRC), Utility Cost Test (UCT), and the Participant Cost Test (PCT).
This memo provides analysis inputs and results in the following tables:
• Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
• Table 2: Portfolio Level Costs, Nominal - PY2022
• Table 3: Benefit/Cost Ratios by Portfolio Type
• Table 4: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
• Table 5: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
• Table 6: 2022 C&I Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results
• Table 7: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
• Table 8: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
• Table 9: 2022 Low Income NEBs
• Table 10: 2022 Home Energy Savings NEBs by Measure
The following assumptions were utilized in the analysis:
Avoided Costs: Hourly values provided by PacifiCorp based on the 2021 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
Preferred Portfolio, converted into annual values using Idaho load shapes from the same IRP.
Modeling Inputs: measure savings, costs, measure lives, incentive levels, and portfolio costs were based on
estimates provided by PacifiCorp.
Other Economic Assumptions: Discount rate, line loss, retail rate, and inflation rate values were provided by
PacifiCorp and are presented in Table 1 below.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 1

I
Tables 1 and 2 below summarize cost-effectiveness assumptions for the PacifiCorp Idaho energy efficiency
portfolio. All costs and impacts are presented at the portfolio level.
Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
Parameter Value
Discount Rate 6.88%
Residential Line Loss 9.06%
Commercial Line Loss 8.59%
Industrial Line Loss 3.83%
Irrigation Line Loss 9.05%
Residential Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.10
Commercial Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.09
Industrial Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.07
Irrigation Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.09
Inflation Rate 2.16%
Table 2: Portfolio Level Costs, Nominal-PY20221
Category PY2022
C&I Evaluation Costs $160,361
Residential Evaluation Costs $49,508
Low Income Energy Conservation $0
Education
Outreach &Communications $119,099
Potential Study $88,184
System Support $12,643
Total $429,795
Tables 3 through 8 present the cost-effectiveness results at the portfolio and sector levels. Tables 9 and 10 present
NEBs impacts for the low income and HES programs.
1 To align with annual budget expectations,cost-effectiveness inputs are presented in nominal dollars.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 2

Table 3: Benefit/Cost Ratios by Portfolio Type
Program PTRC TRC UCT PCT RIM
Total Portfolio (Including NEBs) 1.07 0.97 1.31 3.19 0.42
Total Portfolio 1.04 0.95 1.31 3.18 0.42
Commercial & Industrial 1.14 1.03 1.49 2.83 0.47
Residential (Including NEBs) 1.21 1.11 1.36 4.31 0.36
Residential 1.10 1.00 1.36 4.26 0.36
Table 4: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC)
$0.06 $5,723,386 $6,110,602 $387,216 1.07
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC)
$0.06 $5,723,386 $5,569,203 ($154,183) 0.97
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.05 $4,151,607 $5,422,114 $1,270,508 1.31
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $3,115,004 $9,941,112 $6,826,108 3.19
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $12,832,197 $5,422,114 ($7,410,083) 0.42
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00034
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
2.51
(yea rs)
Table 5: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.06 $5,723,386 $5,955,388 $232,002 1.04
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.06 $5,723,386 $5,413,989 ($309,397) 0.95
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.05 $4,151,607 $5,422,114 $1,270,508 1.31
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $3,115,004 $9,897,549 $6,782,545 3.18
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $12,832,197 $5,422,114 ($7,410,083) 0.42
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00034
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
2.51
(years)
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 3

11
Table 6: 2022 C&I Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.06 $3,876,580 $4,403,018 $526,438 1.14
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.06 $3,876,580 $4,002,744 $126,164 1.03
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $2,678,130 $4,002,744 $1,324,614 1.49
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $2,357,332 $6,672,963 $4,315,631 2.83
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $8,487,961 $4,002,744 ($4,485,218) 0.47
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00034
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
4.58
(years)
Table 7: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.05 $1,417,012 $1,707,584 $290,573 1.21
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.05 $1,417,012 $1,566,460 $149,448 1.11
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $1,043,682 $1,419,371 $375,689 1.36
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $757,672 $3,268,148 $2,510,476 4.31
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $3,914,441 $1,419,371 ($2,495,070) 0.36
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00010
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
1.04
(years)
Table 8: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.05 $1,417,012 $1,552,370 $135,359 1.10
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.05 $1,417,012 $1,411,246 ($5,766) 1.00
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $1,043,682 $1,419,371 $375,689 1.36
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $757,672 $3,224,586 $2,466,914 4.26
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $3,914,441 $1,419,371 ($2,495,070) 0.36
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00010
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
1.04
(years)
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 4

Table 9: 2022 Low Income NEBs
Non-Energy Benefit Program Perspective
Impact Adjusted
Total NEBs $117,288 PTRC,TRC
Table 10: 2022 Home Energy Savings NEBs by Measure
Total NEBs Total NPV
Measure Name ($�yr) Quantity Measure Life Discount Rate Benefits
Appliances $283 39 13.52 6.88% $2,343
Energy Kits $5,073 408 10.26 6.88% $35,583
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 5

'0AEG
APPLIED ENERGY GROUP
MEMORANDUM
To: Alesha Mander, PacifiCorp
From: Andrew Cottrell, Andy Hudson, Elizabeth Applegate, AEG
Date: April 21, 2023
Re: PacifiCorp Idaho Portfolio and Sector Level Cost-Effectiveness Results (without Low-Income) — PY2022
AEG estimated the cost-effectiveness of PacifiCorp's overall energy efficiency portfolio in the state of Idaho based
on Program Year (PY) 2022 costs and savings estimates provided by PacifiCorp. This memo provides cost-
effectiveness results at the portfolio and sector levels. The portfolio (including NEBs) passes the PacifiCorp Total
Resource Cost Test (PTRC), Utility Cost Test (UCT) and the Participant Cost Test (PCT).
This memo provides analysis inputs and results in the following tables:
• Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
• Table 2: Portfolio Level Costs, Nominal - PY2022
• Table 3: Benefit/Cost Ratios by Portfolio Type
• Table 4: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
• Table 5: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
• Table 6: 2022 C&I Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results
• Table 7: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
• Table 8: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
• Table 9: 2022 Home Energy Savings NEBs by Measure
The following assumptions were utilized in the analysis:
Avoided Costs: Hourly values provided by PacifiCorp based on the 2021 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
Preferred Portfolio, converted into annual values using Idaho load shapes from the same IRP.
Modeling Inputs: measure savings, costs, measure lives, incentive levels, and portfolio costs were based on
estimates provided by PacifiCorp.
Other Economic Assumptions: Discount rate, line loss, retail rate, and inflation rate values were provided by
PacifiCorp and are presented in Table 1 below.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 1

I
Tables 1 and 2 below summarize cost-effectiveness assumptions for the PacifiCorp Idaho energy efficiency
portfolio. All costs and impacts are presented at the portfolio level.
Table 7: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
Parameter Value
Discount Rate 6.88%
Residential Line Loss 9.06%
Commercial Line Loss 8.59%
Industrial Line Loss 3.83%
Irrigation Line Loss 9.05%
Residential Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.10
Commercial Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.09
Industrial Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.07
Irrigation Energy Rate* ($/kWh) $0.09
Inflation Rate 2.16%
Table 2: Portfolio Level Costs, Nominal-PY20221
Category PY2022
C&I Evaluation Costs $160,361
Residential Evaluation Costs $49,508
Low Income Energy Conservation Education $0
Outreach &Communications $119,099
Potential Study $88,184
System Support $12,643
Total $429,795
Tables 3 through 8 present the cost-effectiveness results at the portfolio and sector levels. Table 9 presents the
NEBs impacts for the Home Energy Savings program.
Table 3: Benefit/Cost Ratios by Portfolio Type
Program PTRC TRC UCT PCT RIM
Total Portfolio (Including NEBs) 1.07 0.97 1.35 3.27 0.43
Total Portfolio 1.06 0.97 1.35 3.25 0.43
Commercial & Industrial 1.14 1.03 1.49 2.83 0.47
Residential (Including NEBs) 1.24 1.13 1.55 4.89 0.37
Residential 1.21 1.10 1.55 4.82 0.37
1 To align with annual budget expectations,cost-effectiveness inputs are presented in nominal dollars.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 2

I
Table 4: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.06 $5,575,411 $5,970,483 $395,073 1.07
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.06 $5,575,411 $5,431,160 ($144,251) 0.97
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.05 $4,003,631 $5,393,234 $1,389,603 1.35
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $2,994,220 $9,784,587 $6,790,367 3.27
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $12,648,481 $5,393,234 ($7,255,247) 0.43
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00033
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
2.43
(years)
Table 5: 2022 Total Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.06 $5,575,411 $5,932,557 $357,146 1.06
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.06 $5,575,411 $5,393,234 ($182,177) 0.97
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.05 $4,003,631 $5,393,234 $1,389,603 1.35
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $2,994,220 $9,741,024 $6,746,804 3.25
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $12,648,481 $5,393,234 ($7,255,247) 0.43
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00033
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
2.43
(years)
Table 6: 2022 C&I Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.09 $2,750,562 $2,092,100 ($658,462) 0.76
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.09 $2,750,562 $1,901,909 ($848,653) 0.69
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.07 $2,322,076 $1,901,909 ($420,167) 0.82
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $1,165,466 $3,782,827 $2,617,360 3.25
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $5,597,825 $1,901,909 ($3,695,916) 0.34
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00023
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
4.05
(years)
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 3

11
Table 7: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
Levelized NPV Net
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.05 $1,269,036 $1,567,466 $298,429 1.24
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.05 $1,269,036 $1,428,417 $159,380 1.13
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.03 $895,707 $1,390,490 $494,784 1.55
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $636,888 $3,111,623 $2,474,735 4.89
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $3,730,725 $1,390,490 ($2,340,234) 0.37
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00010
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
0.88
(years)
Table 8: 2022 Residential Energy Efficiency Sector Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs Net Benefits
$/kWh Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC)
$0.05 $1,269,036 $1,529,539 $260,503 1.21
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)
$0.05 $1,269,036 $1,390,490 $121,454 1.10
No Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.03 $895,707 $1,390,490 $494,784 1.55
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $636,888 $3,068,061 $2,431,173 4.82
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $3,730,725 $1,390,490 ($2,340,234) 0.37
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts
( 0.00010
$/kWh)
Discounted Participant Payback
0.88
(years)
Table 9: 2022 Home Energy Savings NEBs by Measure
Total NEBs Measure Total NPV
($/Y
Measure Name ) Quantity Discount Rate
r Life Benefits
Appliances $283 39 13.52 6.88% $2,343
Energy Kits $5,073 408 10.26 6.88% $35,583
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 4

'0AEG
APPLIED ENERGY GROUP
MEMORANDUM
To: Alesha Mander, PacifiCorp
From: Andrew Cottrell, Andy Hudson, Elizabeth Applegate, AEG
Date: April 21, 2023
Re: PacifiCorp Idaho Wattsmart Homes Cost-Effectiveness Results — PY2022
AEG estimated the cost-effectiveness of PacifiCorp's overall energy efficiency portfolio in the state of Idaho based
on Program Year (PY) 2022 costs and savings estimates provided by PacifiCorp. This memo provides cost-
effectiveness results for the Wattsmart Homes (WSH) program. The program (including NEBs) passes the
PacifiCorp Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC), Utility Cost Test (UCT) and the Participant Cost Test (PCT).
This memo provides analysis inputs and results in the following tables:
• Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
• Table 2: WSH Annual Program Costs, Nominal - PY2022
• Table 3: 2022 Home Energy Savings kWh Savings by Measure Category
• Table 4: 2022 Benefit/Cost Ratios by Measure Category
• Table 5: 2022 WSH Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
• Table 6: 2022 Appliances Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape- Residential_ERWH_7P)
• Table 7: 2022 Building Shell Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape -
ID—Single—Family—Heat—pump)
• Table 8: 2022 Electronics Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape- ID—Single Family—Plug)
• Table 9: 2022 Home Energy Kits Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape
Residential_LIGHTING_7P)
• Table 10: 2022 HVAC Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) (Load Shape
ID—Single—Family—Heat—pump)
• Table 11: 2022 Lighting Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) (Load Shape
Residential_LIGHTING_7P)
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 1

I
• Table 12: 2022 Water Heating Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) (Load Shape
Residential_ERWH_7P)
• Table 13: 2022 Whole Building Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) (Load Shape
ID—Single—Family—Heat—pump)
• Table 14: 2022 Transportation Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) (Load Shape
ID—Single—Family—Heating)
• Table 15: Home Energy Savings NEBs by Measure - PY2022
• Table 16: 2022 WSH Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
• Table 17: Appliances Cost-Effectiveness Results (with NEBs) - PY2022 (Load Shape- Residential_ERWH_7P)
• Table 18: Home Energy Kit Cost-Effectiveness Results (with NEBs) - PY2022 (Load Shape -
Residential_LIGHTING_7P)
The following assumptions were utilized in the analysis:
Avoided Costs: Hourly values provided by PacifiCorp based on the 2021 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
Preferred Portfolio, converted into annual values using Idaho load shapes from the same IRP.
Modeling Inputs: measure savings, costs, measure lives, incentive levels, and portfolio costs were based on
estimates provided by PacifiCorp.
Other Economic Assumptions: Discount rate, line loss, retail rate, and inflation rate values were provided by
PacifiCorp and are presented in Table 1 below.
Tables 1 and 2 below summarize cost-effectiveness assumptions for the Home Energy Savings program. All costs
and impacts are presented at the program and measure category level.
Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
Parameter Value
Discount Rate 6.88%
Residential Line Loss 9.06%
Residential Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.10
Inflation Rate' 2.16%
Tables 3 through 15 present the savings and cost-effectiveness results at the program and measure category
levels. Tables 16 and 19 present the NEBs impacts for the WSH program and the cost-effectiveness results
including NEBs at the program and measure category levels.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 2

11
Table 2: WSH Annual Program Costs, Nominal-PY20221
Program Utility Program Total Utility Gross
Measure Category Incentives Customer
Delivery Admin Development Budget
Costs
Appliances $377 $13 $129 $1,205 $1,723 $3,160
Building Shell $2,052 $69 $704 $5,505 $8,331 $12,707
Electronics $168 $6 $58 $285 $517 $462
Energy Kits $4,566 $251 $2,550 $2,579 $9,945 $2,244
HVAC $30,460 $1,029 $10,451 $37,713 $79,653 $131,665
Lighting $32,539 $19 $188 $611 $33,357 $1,294
Water Heating $3,830 $129 $1,314 $8,700 $13,974 $11,728
Whole Building $9,680 $327 $3,321 $20,625 $33,953 $83,727
Transportation $341,954 $11,555 $117,321 $155,819 $626,649 $359,386
Total Program $425,627 $13,398 $136,036 $233,043 $808,104 $606,372
Table 3: 2022 Home Energy Savings kWh Savings by Measure Category
Gross kWh Adjusted Net kWh
Realization Gross kWh Net to Measure
Measure Category Savings at Savings at
Rate Savings at Gross Ratio Life
Site Site
Site
Appliances 2,591 80% 2,073 88% 1,824 14
Building Shell 14,124 61% 8,615 88% 7,582 45
Electronics 1,159 52% 603 97% 585 5
Energy Kits 51,135 55% 28,125 87% 24,468 10
HVAC 209,605 100% 209,605 89% 186,549 13
Lighting 3,777 57% 2,153 87% 1,873 16
Water Heating 26,359 61% 16,079 99% 15,918 13
Whole Building 66,610 100% 66,610 88% 58,617 40
Transportation 2,353,107 100% 2,353,107 100% 2,353,107 10
Total Program 2,728,468 98% 2,686,970 99% 2,650,523 11
1 To align with annual budget expectations,cost-effectiveness inputs are presented in nominal dollars.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 3

I
Table 4: 2022 Benefit/Cost Ratios by Measure Category
Measure Category PTRC TRC UCT PCT RIM
Appliances 0.31 0.28 0.60 0.96 0.26
Appliances (with NEIs) 0.95 0.92 0.60 1.70 0.26
Building Shell 0.62 0.56 1.05 1.57 0.34
Building Shell (with NEIs) 0.62 0.56 1.05 1.57 0.34
Electronics 0.24 0.22 0.29 1.19 0.19
Electronics (with NEIs) 0.24 0.22 0.29 1.19 0.19
Energy Kits 1.44 1.31 1.27 10.79 0.36
Energy Kits (with NEIs) 5.14 5.01 1.27 26.65 0.36
HVAC 0.64 0.58 1.26 1.70 0.34
HVAC (with NEIs) 0.64 0.58 1.26 1.70 0.34
Lighting 0.04 0.04 0.04 2.12 0.03
Lighting (with NEIs) 0.04 0.04 0.04 2.12 0.03
Water Heating 0.56 0.51 0.62 2.12 0.28
Water Heating (with NEIs) 0.56 0.51 0.62 2.12 0.28
Water Heating 0.56 0.51 0.62 2.12 0.28
Water Heating (with NEIs) 0.56 0.51 0.62 2.12 0.28
Total 1.00 0.91 1.32 4.08 0.34
Total with NEBs 1.03 0.94 1.32 4.15 0.34
Table 5: 2022 WSH Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs)
Levelized NPV Net Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs
$/kWh Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) +
$0.05 $1,181,433 $1,177,662 ($3,772) 1.00
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No
$0.05 $1,181,433 $1,070,601 ($110,832) 0.91
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $808,104 $1,070,601 $262,498 1.32
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $636,888 $2,600,361 $1,963,473 4.08
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $3,175,422 $1,070,601 ($2,104,821) 0.34
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00008
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 2.57
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 4

11
Table 6: 2022 Appliances Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape- Residential ERWH_7P)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.20 $3,678 $1,140 ($2,538) 0.31
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.20 $3,678 $1,037 ($2,642) 0.28
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.09 $1,723 $1,037 ($687) 0.60
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $3,590 $3,433 ($158) 0.96
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $3,951 $1,037 ($2,915) 0.26
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 14.14
Table 7: 2022 Building Shell Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape-
ID_Single_Family_Heat pump)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.13 $15,533 $9,638 ($5,895) 0.62
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.13 $15,533 $8,762 ($6,771) 0.56
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.07 $8,331 $8,762 $431 1.05
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $14,439 $22,666 $8,227 1.57
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $25,492 $8,762 ($16,730) 0.34
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 28.67
Table 8: 2022 Electronics Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape-ID—Single Family Plug)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) +
$0.25 $694 $165 ($528) 0.24
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No
$0.25 $694 $150 ($543) 0.22
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.18 $517 $150 ($366) 0.29
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $476 $564 $88 1.19
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $796 $150 ($646) 0.19
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 4.22
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 5

I
Table 9: 2022 Home Energy Kits Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape-
Residential LIGHTING_7P)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.04 $9,610 $13,846 $4,236 1.44
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.04 $9,610 $12,588 $2,978 1.31
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.05 $9,945 $12,588 $2,642 1.27
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $2,579 $27,833 $25,254 10.79
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $35,199 $12,588 ($22,612) 0.36
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 0.95
Table 10: 2022 HVAC Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape- ID_Single_Family_Heat pump)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.09 $173,605 $110,736 ($62,869) 0.64
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.09 $173,605 $100,669 ($72,936) 0.58
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $79,653 $100,669 $21,016 1.26
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $147,938 $251,181 $103,242 1.70
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $293,120 $100,669 ($192,452) 0.34
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00001
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 8
Table 11: 2022 Lighting Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape-Residential LIGHTING_7P)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$1.64 $34,040 $1,359 ($32,682) 0.04
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$1.64 $34,040 $1,235 ($32,805) 0.04
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $1.60 $33,357 $1,235 ($32,122) 0.04
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $1,488 $3,152 $1,664 2.12
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $35,898 $1,235 ($34,663) 0.03
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 7
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 6

Table 12: 2022 Water Heating Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape- Residential ERWH_7P)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.11 $17,002 $9,487 ($7,515) 0.56
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.11 $17,002 $8,625 ($8,378) 0.51
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.09 $13,974 $8,625 ($5,350) 0.62
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $11,847 $25,075 $13,228 2.12
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $30,349 $8,625 ($21,725) 0.28
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 6
Table 13: 2022 Whole Building Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape-
ID_Single_Family_Heat pump)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) +
$0.10 $97,055 $72,718 ($24,337) 0.75
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No
$0.10 $97,055 $66,107 ($30,948) 0.68
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $33,953 $66,107 $32,154 1.95
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $95,144 $149,349 $54,205 1.57
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $162,677 $66,107 ($96,570) 0.41
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 26
Table 14: 2022 Transportation Cost-Effectiveness Results (Without NEBs) - (Load Shape-
ID_Single_Family_Heating)
Levelized NPV Net Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs
$/kWh Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) +
$0.04 $830,217 $958,573 $128,356 1.15
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No
$0.04 $830,217 $871,430 $41,213 1.05
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.03 $626,649 $871,430 $244,781 1.39
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $359,386 $2,117,108 $1,757,722 5.89
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $2,587,939 $871,430 ($1,716,509) 0.34
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00014
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 1.64
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 7

I
Table 15: Home Energy Savings NEBs by Measure- PY2022
Total NEBs Measure Discount Total NPV
Measure Name ($/yr) Quantity
Life Rate Benefits
Appliances $283 39 13.52 6.88% $2,343
Energy Kits $5,073 408 10.26 6.88% $35,583
Table 76: 2022 WSH Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs)
Levelized NPV Net Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs
$/kWh Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) +
$0.05 $1,181,433 $1,215,588 $34,154 1.03
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No Adder $0.05 $1,181,433 $1,108,528 ($72,906) 0.94
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.04 $808,104 $1,070,601 $262,498 1.32
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $636,888 $2,643,924 $2,007,036 4.15
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $3,175,422 $1,070,601 ($2,104,821) 0.34
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00008
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 3
Table 17:Appliances Cost-Effectiveness Results (with NEBs) -PY2022 (Load Shape- Residential ERWH_7P)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV NPV Net Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Costs Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) +
$0.20 $3,678 $3,483 ($195) 0.95
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No Adder $0.20 $3,678 $3,379 ($299) 0.92
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.09 $1,723 $1,037 ($687) 0.60
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $3,590 $6,095 $2,505 1.70
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $3,951 $1,037 ($2,915) 0.26
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 8
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 8

11
Table 78: Home Energy Kit Cost-Effectiveness Results (with NEBs) -PY2022 (Load Shape-
Residential LIGHTING_7P)
Levelized NPV Net Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Costs
$/kWh Benefits Benefits Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test(PTRC) + Conservation
$0.04 $9,610 $49,430 $39,820 5.14
Adder
Total Resource Cost Test(TRC) No Adder $0.04 $9,610 $48,171 $38,561 5.01
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.05 $9,945 $12,588 $2,642 1.27
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $2,579 $68,734 $66,155 26.65
Rate Impact Test (RIM) $35,199 $12,588 ($22,612) 0.36
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00000
Discounted Participant Payback (years) 0.38
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 9

'0AEG
APPLIED ENERGY GROUP
MEMORANDUM
To: Alesha Mander, PacifiCorp
From: Andrew Cottrell, Andy Hudson, Elizabeth Applegate, AEG
Date: April 21, 2023
Re: PacifiCorp Idaho Home Energy Reporting Cost-Effectiveness Results — PY2022
AEG estimated the cost-effectiveness of PacifiCorp's overall energy efficiency portfolio in the state of Idaho based
on Program Year (PY) 2022 costs and savings estimates provided by PacifiCorp. This memo provides cost-
effectiveness results for the Home Energy Reporting program. The program passes all cost effectiveness tests.
This memo provides analysis inputs and results in the following tables:
• Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
• Table 2: Home Energy Reporting Annual Program Costs, Nominal - PY2022
• Table 3: 2022 Home Energy Reporting kWh Savings by Measure Category
• Table 4: 2022 Home Energy Reporting Program Cost-Effectiveness Results - (Load Shape -
ID—Single—Family—Heat—pump)
The following assumptions were utilized in the analysis:
Avoided Costs: Hourly values provided by PacifiCorp based on the 2021 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
Preferred Portfolio, converted into annual values using Idaho load shapes from the same IRP.
Modeling Inputs: measure savings, costs, measure lives, incentive levels, and portfolio costs were based on
estimates provided by PacifiCorp.
Other Economic Assumptions: Discount rate, line loss, retail rate, and inflation rate values were provided by
PacifiCorp and are presented in Table 1 below.
Tables 1 and 2 below summarize cost-effectiveness assumptions for the Home Energy Reporting program. All
costs and impacts are presented at the program level.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 1

Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
Parameter Value
Discount Rate 6.88%
Residential Line Loss 9.06%
Residential Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.10
Inflation Rate' 2.16%
Table 2: Home Energy Reporting Annual Program Costs, Nominal-PY2022'
Program Program Total Utility
Program Year Utility Admin Incentives
Delivery Development Budget
Home Energy Reports $63,000 $4,603 $20,000 $0 $87,603
Total Program $63,000 $4,603 $20,000 $0 $87,603
Tables 3 and 4 present the savings and cost-effectiveness results at the program and measure category levels.
Table 3: 2022 Home Energy Reporting kWh Savings by Measure Category
Gross kWh Adjusted Net to Net kWh
Realization Gross kWh Measure
Program Year Savings at Gross Savings at
Rate Savings at Life
Site Ratio Site
Site
Home Energy
5,018,450 92% 4,616,974 100% 4,616,974 1
Reports
Total Program 5,018,450 92% 4,616,974 100% 4,616,974 1
Table 4: 2022 Home Energy Reporting Program Cost-Effectiveness Results- (Load Shape-
ID_Single_Family_Heat pump)
Levelized NPV Benefit/Cost
Cost-Effectiveness Test NPV Benefits Net Benefits
$/kWh Costs Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.02 $87,603 $351,878 $264,275 4.02
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.02 $87,603 $319,889 $232,286 3.65
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.02 $87,603 $319,889 $232,286 3.65
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $0 $467,699 $467,699 n/a
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $555,303 $319,889 ($235,414) 0.58
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00024
1 To align with annual budget expectations,cost-effectiveness inputs are presented in nominal dollars.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 2

'0AEG
APPLIED ENERGY GROUP
MEMORANDUM
To: Alesha Mander, PacifiCorp
From: Andrew Cottrell, Andy Hudson, Elizabeth Applegate, AEG
Date: April 21, 2023
Re: PacifiCorp Idaho Low-Income Weatherization Cost-Effectiveness Results — PY2022
AEG estimated the cost-effectiveness of PacifiCorp's overall energy efficiency portfolio in the state of Idaho based
on Program Year (PY) 2022 costs and savings estimates provided by PacifiCorp. This memo provides cost-
effectiveness results for the Low-Income Weatherization program. The program does not pass any of the cost
effectiveness tests.
This memo provides analysis inputs and results in the following tables:
• Table 1: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
• Table 2: Low Income Weatherization Annual Program Costs, Nominal - PY2022
• Table 3: 2022 Low Income Weatherization kWh Savings by Measure Category
• Table 4: 2022 Low Income Weatherization Benefit/Cost Ratios by Measure Category
• Table 5: 2022 Low Income Weatherization Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (without NEBs) - (Load
Shape- ID—Single—Family—Heat—pump)
• Table 6: 2022 Low Income Weatherization NEBs
• Table 7: 2022 Low Income Weatherization Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs) - (Load
Shape- ID—Single—Family—Heat—pump)
The following assumptions were utilized in the analysis:
Avoided Costs: Hourly values provided by PacifiCorp based on the 2021 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
Preferred Portfolio, converted into annual values using Idaho load shapes from the same IRP.
Modeling Inputs: measure savings, costs, measure lives, incentive levels, and portfolio costs were based on
estimates provided by PacifiCorp.
Other Economic Assumptions: Discount rate, line loss, retail rate, and inflation rate values were provided by
PacifiCorp and are presented in Table 1 below.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 1

I
Tables 1 and 2 below summarize cost-effectiveness assumptions for the Low Income Weatherization program.
All costs and impacts are presented at the program and measure category level.
Table 7: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Inputs
Parameter Value
Discount Rate 6.88%
Residential Line Loss 9.06%
Residential Energy Rate ($/kWh) $0.10
Inflation Rate' 2.16%
Table 2: Low Income Weatherization Annual Program Costs, Nominal- PY20221
Program Utility Program Total Utility Gross
Program Year Incentives Customer
Delivery Admin Development Budget
Costs
Low Income Weatherization $8,503 $2,516 $16,172 $120,784 $147,975 $120,784
Total Program $8,503 $2,516 $16,172 $120,784 $147,975 $120,784
Tables 3 through 5 present the savings and cost-effectiveness results at the program and measure category levels.
Tables 6 and 7 present the NEB impacts for the Low-Income Weatherization program and the cost-effectiveness
results including NEBs at the program level.
Table 3: 2022 Low Income Weatherization kWh Savings by Measure Category
Gross Adjusted
Net kWh
Program Year
kWh Realization Gross kWh Net to Gross Savings at Measure
Savings at Rate Savings at Ratio Life
Site
Site Site
Home Energy Reports 31,995 72% 23,036 100% 23,036 25
Total Program 31,995 72% 23,036 100% 23,036 25
1 To align with annual budget expectations,cost-effectiveness inputs are presented in nominal dollars.
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 2

Table 4: 2022 Low Income Weatherization Benefit/Cost Ratios by Measure Category
Program Year PTRC TRC UCT RIM PCT
Low Income Weatherization
with NEBs 0.95 0.93 0.20 0.16 n/a
Low Income Weatherization 0.15 0.14 0.20 0.16 n/a
Table 5: 2022 Low Income Weatherization Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (without NEBs) - (Load Shape-
ID_Single_Family_Heat pump)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV Costs NPV Benefits Net Benefits Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.47 $147,975 $22,831 ($125,144) 0.15
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.47 $147,975 $20,755 ($127,220) 0.14
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.47 $147,975 $28,880 ($119,095) 0.20
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $120,784 $156,525 $35,741 1.30
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $183,716 $28,880 ($154,836) 0.16
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00001
Table 6: 2022 Low Income Weatherization NEBs
Non-Energy Benefit Program Perspective
Impact Adjusted
Total NEBs $117,288 PTRC, TRC
Table 7: 2022 Low Income Weatherization Program Cost-Effectiveness Results (Including NEBs) - (Load Shape-
ID_Single_Family_Heat pump)
Cost-Effectiveness Test Levelized NPV Costs NPV Benefits Net Benefits Benefit/Cost
$/kWh Ratio
Total Resource Cost Test (PTRC) +
$0.47 $147,975 $140,119 ($7,856) 0.95
Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC) No
$0.47 $147,975 $138,043 ($9,932) 0.93
Adder
Utility Cost Test (UCT) $0.47 $147,975 $28,880 ($119,095) 0.20
Participant Cost Test (PCT) $120,784 $156,525 $35,741 1.30
Rate Impact Test(RIM) $183,716 $28,880 ($154,836) 0.16
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh) 0.00001
Applied Energy Group,Inc. I appliedenergygroup.com 3

APPENDICES B & C
ARE CONFIDENTIAL IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND
ARE PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER