HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240816Staff Application.pdf RECEIVED
2024 August 16,AM 10:04
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES
ADAM TRIPLETT COMMISSION
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
(208)334-0318
IDAHO BAR NO. 10221
Street Address for Express Mail:
11331 W CHINDEN BVLD,BLDG 8, SUITE 201-A
BOISE, ID 83714
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF COMMISSION ) CASE NO. GNR-E-24-01
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE )
INPUTS TO THE SURROGATE ) STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE
AVOIDED RESOURCE METHOD ) SAR MODEL AND SAR-BASED
AVOIDED COST RATES ) AVOIDED COST RATES
Commission Staff, pursuant to Commission Rule of Procedure 52, the applicable
provisions of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 ("PURPA"), and as directed by
Order No. 34628, respectfully applies to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission("Commission")
for an order updating inputs to the surrogate avoided resource model ("SAR Model"), making
administrative changes to the SAR Model, and approving the SAR-based avoided cost rates
attached to this Application.
I. BACKGROUND
The Commission calculates and publishes SAR Method rates for qualifying facilities
("QF") that are under the applicable resource type project eligibility cap. In Order No. 32697,
the Commission found it was appropriate to annually update the SAR Model with the most
recent gas forecast provided by U.S. Energy Information Administration's ("EIA") Annual
Energy Outlook, specifically the Mountain Region Reference Case forecast. Since then, Staff
has used this data source for the annual natural gas forecast update for the SAR Model.
However, EIA did not publish Annual Energy Outlook in 2024,because their modeling system
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-1-
"requires substantial updates to better model hydrogen, carbon capture, and other emerging
technologies." See https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/.
II. INTRODUCTION
Staff proposes the following in this Application:
• Use of the average of AECO Hub prices, Stanfield Hub prices, Sumas Hub
prices, and Opal Hub prices from the December 2023 natural gas price forecast
published by Northwest Power and Conservation Council ("NWPCC") for this
year's update and for future updates until the EIA forecast becomes available.
This will ensure published avoided cost rates are determined accurately by using
the latest natural gas forecast.
• Separation of the current SAR Model into three utility-specific SAR Models(i.e.
Avista SAR Model, Idaho Power SAR Model, and Rocky Mountain Power SAR
Model.) This will prevent complications and processing delays caused by
multiple model updates from different utilities that occur during the same time.
Staff will discuss each item below in detail.
III. PROPOSED NATURAL GAS FORECAST FOR 2024
To accomplish this year's annual update for the SAR Model, Staff explored different
options to replace the natural gas price forecast until the EIA forecast becomes available. In
considering its options, Staff considered the following criteria:
a) The forecast must be publicly available;
b) The release of the forecast should be close to the time when EIA publishes its forecast;
c) The forecast should reflect prices of the natural gas sourced by Idaho's three regulated
electric utilities;
d) The time horizon of the forecast must have sufficient length for 20-year contracts; and
e) The resulting forecasts from the source chosen should yield similar results to EIA's
forecasts produced in a similar prior time period.
Based on these criteria, Staff proposes to use the average of AECO Hub prices, Stanfield
Hub prices, Sumas Hub prices, and Opal Hub prices from the December 2023 natural gas price
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-2-
forecast published by Northwest Power and Conservation Council ("NWPCC") for this year's
update and for future updates until the EIA forecast becomes available. See
https://www.nwcouncil.or /g energy/energy-forecasts/ The proposed forecast is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Proposed Natural Gas Forecast based on Four Hubs
AECO Sumas Opal Stanfield Average
2024 2.90 4.22 4.21 4.13 3.87
2025 3.15 4.56 4.60 4.51 4.20
2026 3.07 4.46 4.48 4.40 4.10
2027 3.05 5.39 4.88 4.80 4.53
2028 3.00 5.30 4.78 4.71 4.45
2029 2.98 4.33 4.34 4.26 3.98
2030 3.23 4.67 4.72 4.64 4.31
2031 3.38 4.88 4.96 4.87 4.53
2032 3.61 5.20 5.33 5.23 4.84
2033 3.69 5.30 5.45 5.35 4.95
2034 3.84 5.52 5.69 5.59 5.16
2035 4.19 5.99 6.23 6.12 5.63
2036 4.42 6.31 6.59 6.48 5.95
2037 4.50 6.41 6.71 6.59 6.05
2038 4.61 6.57 6.89 6.77 6.21
2039 4.84 6.89 7.25 7.13 6.53
2040 5.26 7.47 7.92 7.78 7.11
2041 5.45 7.72 8.21 8.07 7.36
2042 5.59 7.91 8.43 8.28 7.55
2043 5.79 8.19 8.74 8.59 7.83
2044 5.83 8.25 8.81 8.66 7.89
2045 5.97 8.43 9.02 8.87 8.07
2046 6.12 8.64 9.26 9.10 8.28
2047 6.27 8.85 9.50 9.34 8.49
2048 6.43 9.07 9.75 9.59 8.71
2049 6.59 9.30 10.01 9.84 8.94
2050 6.76 9.53 10.27 10.10 9.16
Public Availability
Like the EIA forecast,the NWPCC forecast is a publicly available dataset,which provides
a higher level of transparency. (The NWPCC forecast was used in the SAR Model before the
Commission adopted the EIA forecast. See Order No. 32697 at 10.)
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-3-
Similar Release Dates
December of 2023 is close to the time when EIA would have updated its natural gas
forecast. Typically, EIA publishes its annual natural gas forecast between January and March of
each year. Staff believes December of 2023 is close to when EIA would have updated its 2024
forecast.
Idaho Utility Sources of Natural Gas aligned geographically with Staff Proposed Forecast
Staff s method uses NWPPC's AECO, Stanfield, Sumas, and Opal hub forecasts, which
are the major hubs utilized by Avista, Idaho Power, and Rocky Mountain Power. Staff believes
that, by using these hubs as a basis for Staffs proposed forecast, it aligns with the rationale for
using EIA's Rocky Mountain Region forecast,which was adopted in Order No. 32697 as the three
Idaho utilities are largely located within Mountain Region.
For example, Avista receives 84% of its gas from AECO Hub and 15% of its gas from
Stanfield Hub. See Avista's Audit Request Response No. 1(b)filed on May 8,2024. Idaho Power
receives 70% of its gas from Sumas Hub and 30% of its gas from Opal Hub. See Idaho Power's
Audit Request Response No. 1(b) filed on April 24, 2024. Rocky Mountain Power receives 74%
of its gas from Opal Hub, 15% of its gas from Sumas Hub, and I I%of its gas from Stanfield Hub.
See Column F of Tab"Blended 0324"of the Confidential Attachment in Rocky Mountain Power's
I sT Supplemental Audit Request Response filed on May 20, 2024.
Sufficient Forecast Time Horizon
The NWPCC forecast reflects natural prices through year 2050,providing a forecast time
horizon sufficient for 20-year contracts that will potentially come online over the next five years.
For example, if a QF is expected to come online in 2029, it would need avoided cost rates from
2029 through 2049, which can be accommodated by the NWPCC forecast.
Forecast Methods Produce Similar Results
Staff compared the 2022 forecast determined under Staffs proposed method to the 2022
EIA Mountain Region forecast as shown in Figure No. 1 below. Because of the similarities of the
two forecasts produced in 2022, Staff believes the proposed forecast from NWPCC data would
likely reflect EIA's forecast,had EIA developed a forecast this year.
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-4-
Average of Four Hubs (May 2022) vs. EIA (March 2022)
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
m 5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042
Average of Four Hubs EIA(Moutain Region)
Figure No. 1: Comparison of Staff s Forecast and EIA's Forecast for Year 2022
IV. SEPARATING SAR MODEL INTO THREE UTILITY-SPECIFIC MODELS
Staff proposes separating the SAR Model into three utility-specific models with the same
calculations and assumptions that are in the current SAR Model to allow Staff to make changes to
the model and publish avoided cost rate updates for each utility separately. Currently, the SAR
Model includes all three utilities' assumptions and resulting avoided cost rates. This could create
two issues.
First, when multiple updates from different utilities occur around the same time, the SAR
Model updated for one utility may contain an early update for another utility that has not yet been
approved. For example, assuming the SAR Model is updated to reflect Idaho Power's new first
capacity deficiency period and is sent to Idaho Power for its review. During its review period, the
SAR Model is updated again to reflect Avista's new first capacity deficiency period in an Avista
case. Then the second SAR Model that reflects Avista's new first capacity deficiency period will
contain the first SAR Model's update that reflects Idaho Power's new first capacity deficiency
period, even though the first update has not yet been approved.
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-5-
Second, because different cases may have different processing times, it is possible that a
newly approved SAR Model for one utility may contain outdated information for another utility.
For example,assuming again the SAR Model is updated to reflect Idaho Power's new first capacity
deficiency period, and later the SAR Model is updated again to reflect Avista's new first capacity
deficiency period. If the second SAR Model that contains Avista's update is approved earlier than
the first SAR Model that contains Idaho Power's update, then the latest approved SAR Model,
which is the first SAR Model in this scenario,will contain outdated first capacity deficiency period
of Avista.
To address these issues, Staff proposes separating the SAR Model into three utility-specific
models with the same calculations and assumptions that are in the current model. The separation
into separate models has no effect on the calculation of the rates or the functionality of the model.
Separating the SAR Model also has the added benefit of allowing better tracking of updates that
occur for each utility based on when the updates are approved by the Commission.
V. UPDATED MODELS AND AVOIDED COST RATES
Staff updated the natural gas forecast in each of the separate utility-specific SAR
Models:
• Avoided Cost Model Order No. XXXX ver XXX XX, 2024 Annual Gas Update
(AVU).xlsm
• Avoided Cost Model Order No. XXXX ver XXX XX, 2024 Annual Gas Update
(PAC).xlsm
• Avoided Cost Model Order No. XXXX ver XXX XX, 2024 Annual Gas Update
(IPCO).xlsm
Staff also calculated avoided cost rates using the utility-specific SAR Models and
provided them as attachments to this Application:
• Attachment A Avista Rates for New Contracts
• Attachment B Avista Rates for Renewal Contracts
• Attachment C PAC Rates for New Contracts
• Attachment D PAC Rates for Renewal Contracts
• Attachment E IPCO Rates for New Contracts
• Attachment F IPCO Rates for Renewal Contracts
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-6-
y 'g o 0 o b
CD
CCD
O
v'
ab CD CD 7 I-D o
a.
CD
CD
CL CD cc n con
CD
CD 0 W CD
CcnQ `4 L oo O O r. o .
CL
Q z o 0 0 0 0 O� a � D CD P
y o o p O C CD CD CD m
CL
Qn CD
CD CA O a� O CD CDCD g
CD
d � o •sCD
a c o
CD
CD
yCDCDCD Ln
.�
tv viEn
¢ N -d ° � p �. y 7�
L bdb ¢ � O
CDrD
CD CD n
m CD
� � CD
ni CD r
CD n C
O �' UQ CD m CD
O O �• CD CD m O
_ CD
Qn
N N O v' O d Vim] N �
CD3 � c o o Z � �* Q- CD
CD ry
CD S O `C r
CD
CD CD ¢ cn
�. CDQ, U5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 16th day of August 2024, I served the foregoing
APPLICATION, in Case No. GNR-E-24-01, Via Electronic Mail to the following:
Donovan Walker Mark Alder
Camille Christen Joe Dallas
Idaho Power Company Rocky Mountain Power
1121 W. Idaho Street 83702 1407 West North Temple, Ste. 330
P.O. Box 70 Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Boise, ID 83707-0070 mark.alderkpacificorp.com
dwalkergidahopower.com joseph.dallaskpacificorp.com
CChristen(&idahopower.com
docketskidahopower.com
energycontracts(cr�,idahopower.com
David Meyer
Shawn Bonfield
Avista Corporation
P.O. Box 3727
1411 East Mission Avenue
Spokane, WA 99220-3727
david.meyer(a,avi stacorp.com
shawn.bonfieldgavistac orp.com
avistadocketskavistacorp.com
KERI J. AWKER
Legal Assistant
STAFF'S APPLICATION TO UPDATE SAR MODEL
AND SAR-BASED AVOIDED COST RATES
-8-