20220224Comment.pdf

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
Jan Noriyuki
Thursday, February 24,2022 5:02 PM
Terri Carlock; Dayn Hardie;Taylor Brooks
NaomiCarr; Keri Hawker
FW: Formal Complaint of Richard Keavy 2/24/22
&^le- T- 2t- tV
From: Cheap Advice <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24,2022 4:55 PM
To: Jan Noriyuki <ja [e-mail] ho.gov>
Subject: Formal Complaint of Richard Keavy 2/24/22
Personal and Conftdential
Commission Secretary
Public Utilities Commission
RE: Formal Complaint of Richard Keavy
I have taken the liberty of asking Mr Daniel Klein an occasional question, periodically, as to PUC protocol and
expectations. He has been very helpful. I learned this morning he will be unavailable (for an on line exchange)
until March 8. While the couple of items below may be inconsequential I will feel better about bringing thon
up...respectfully:
#1 - The latest PUC moves involving QwesVCenturyLink (and enjoining the Hawley Troxell firm in Boise)
were both interesting and fitting. I was reminded of some detail mentioned on your web site about a 14 day
timeallotrrent,afteryorrrreceiptofareplytot@andhadtodowithyourabilityto
respond to that answser. IF/when the respondents get around to doing what is expected of them maybe I could
provide a list, to the Secretary, of matters I would like them to answer? I have asked CenturyLink multiple
times and for years for data they may routinely gather and store. I have asked them also to save and secure
information for access at a hopeful later date...which may apply to their late and next responsibility?
If such an opportunity comes up I would like to make some information requests, of CenturyLink through
(and or silently?) the PUC (?) that will hopefully be complimentary to your information gathering routines.
If what I seek doesn't square with your good attending, to PUC business, my request can be declined or just
put away...without a reply from PUC.
In the past Clink has simply ignored my requests for information/data which I believe they had in their
possession. On occasion they admitted the information they kept to from me was not done for legal or privacy
reasons. It was done according to what they rested on to be 'policy' ... as in like it or lump it...run up the
road. : )
2 - I saw the latest PUC/CenturyLink activity and exchanges on your web site this week. The at your web site
communication from Hawley Troxell indicates that I was copied on the L4th. Today is the 24th and I did
not receive anything from them. As you know overnight delivery of first class mail, in city, is not unheard of.
It is unlikely they copied me ten days ago.
I know of that law firm. It would not sumrise me to learn that/ IF they bailed out of the project completely
and may eventually get around to stating so to your folks. That is totally guesswork on my part and may not be
in the mix at all.
1
I am very much looking forward to lww Centurylink will respond to their responsibility to the State of Idaho
and/or the fine that was righfly put to them.
Tha$txB to you and the Public Utilitie.s Commissisn forbeiqg there.
No response to this nec€ssary.
Richard Keav), 208-322-1383
2