HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070227final_order_no_30257.pdfOffice of the Secretary
Service Date
February 27 2007
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
VERIZON NORTHWEST INc. FOR
APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION
AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~
252( e ).
ORDER NO. 30257
CASE NO. VZN-07-
In this case, the Commission is asked to approve a newly negotiated Interconnection
Agreement. With this Order the Commission approves the Agreement.
BACKGROUND
Under the provlSlons of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~
252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that
the agreement: (1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the
agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest
convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No.
28427, companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms
prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of
Section 25 1 (b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis in original). This comports with the
FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection
agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the
requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. ~ 51.3.
THE APPLICATION
On February 13, 2007, Verizon Northwest Inc. submitted an Application for an
interconnection agreement with Metropolitan Telecommunications of Idaho, Inc. dba MetTel. In
this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an agreement that includes
terms and conditions for interconnection, unbundled network elements, collocation, and resale of
telecommunications services.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff has reviewed the Application and does not find any terms or conditions that it
considers to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that the
Application is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho
ORDER NO. 30257
Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Accordingly, Staff recommended
Commission approval of the Agreement.
COMMISSION FINDINGS
Under the terms ofthe Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be
submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission s review is
limited. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that
the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or
implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and
necessity. Id. Based upon our review of the Application and the Staffs recommendation, the
Commission finds that the Agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience and
necessity and does not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that the Application
should be approved. However, approval of this Application does not negate the responsibility of
either of the parties to the Agreement to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or to comply with Idaho Code ~~ 62-604
and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by
Idaho Code ~ 62-603.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Interconnection Agreement between Verizon
Northwest Inc. and Metropolitan Telecommunications of Idaho, Inc. dba MetTel, Case No.
VZN-07-, is approved.
THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order may petition for
reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any
matter decided in this Order. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for
reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code ~ 61-
626.
ORDER NO. 30257
DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this ~ 7 f'I-.
day of February 2007.
Iit~
MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER
ATTEST:
I(\
t...;j
le ri D. Jewell
Co~mission Secretary
O:VZN-07-
ORDER NO. 30257