Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20040220Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:WAYNE HART DATE:FEBRUARY 20, 2004 RE:STAFF REVIEW OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS AND AMENDMENTS: CASE NOS. USW-99-22; USW-00-5; USW-00-14; USW-00-17; USW-00-21; QWE-02-2; QWE-OI-13; QWE-04- VZN- T -04-1 (AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT). BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only ifit finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation ofthe agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS 1. Qwest and NPCR. Inc. dba Nextel Partners (Case No. USW-99-22). This is an amendment to a previously approved agreement implementing new reciprocal compensation terms based upon a three-month study of traffic between the two companies. 2. Owest and Integra Telecom ofIdaho, Inc. (Case No. USW-OO-5).This Application is for an amendment to an existing interconnection agreement adding terms for the conversion of private line service to Unbundled Dedicated Interoffice Transport (UDIT). 3. Owest and Time Warner Telecom ofIdaho, LLC(Case No. USW-OO-14). This Application seeks approval of two amendments to an existing agreement. The first amendment DECISION MEMORANDUM - 1 -FEBRUARY 20, 2004 COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to approve the Applications for Approval ofthe Interconnection Agreements and Amendments listed above? i:udmemos/intc dmO2 DECISION MEMORANDUM - 3 -FEBRUARY 20, 2004