HomeMy WebLinkAbout28863.docBEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION
OF QWEST CORPORATION AND HSA
TELECOM OPERATING CO., INC., FOR
APPROVAL OF A WIRELINE
INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT
TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. QWE-T-01-22
IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION
OF VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC. AND DIGITAL
TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., FOR
APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION
AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e).
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. VZN-T-01-12
ORDER NO. 28863
In these cases, the Commission has been asked to approve two new interconnection agreements.
BACKGROUND
Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No. 28427, companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements “may negotiate terms, prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provisions with Section 251(b) or (c).” Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis original). This comports with the FCC’s statement that “a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of [Part 51].” 47 C.F.R. § 51.3.
THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS
The Commission has been asked to approve a wireline interconnection agreement and a resale interconnection agreement. These Agreements are discussed in greater detail below.
Qwest Corporation and HSA Telecom Operating Co., Inc. (Case No. QWE-T-01-22). In this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an agreement addressing interconnection, unbundled network elements (UNE), ancillary services and the resale of telecommunications services. This Agreement is similar to other agreements approved by the Commission.
Verizon Northwest Inc. and Digital Telecommunications, Inc. (Case No. VZN-T-01-12). In this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve a resale interconnection agreement. This Agreement is similar to other agreements approved by the Commission.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Staff has reviewed these Applications and did not find any terms and conditions to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that the interconnection agreements are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act. Accordingly, Staff believes that the Applications merit the Commission’s approval.
COMMISSION DECISION
Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(1). The Commission’s review is limited, however. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Id. Based upon our review of the Applications, Staff’s recommendation and on the fact no other person commented on these Applications, the Commission finds that the above interconnection agreements are consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and do not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that these Applications should be approved. However, approval of these Agreements does not negate the companies interconnecting with Qwest and Verizon from the responsibility to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or from complying with Idaho Code §§ 62-604 and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local exchange services telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code § 62-603.
O R D E R
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interconnection agreements discussed above are approved. Terms of the Agreements that are not already in effect shall be effective as of the date of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the wireline interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and HSA Telecom Operating Co., Inc., in Case No. QWE-T-01-22, is approved.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the resale interconnection agreement between Verizon Northwest, Inc. and Digital Telecommunications, Inc., in Case No. VZN-T-01-12, is approved.
THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order) or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in these Case Nos. QWE-T-01-22 and VZN-T-01-12 may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in these cases. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code §§ 61-626 and 62-619.
DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho, this
day of September 2001.
PAUL KJELLANDER, PRESIDENT
MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER
DENNIS S. HANSEN, COMMISSIONER
ATTEST:
Jean D. Jewell
Commission Secretary
O:qwet0122_vznt0112_jh
ORDER NO. 28863 1
Office of the Secretary
Service Date
October 1, 2001