Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout28370.mod.docBEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF FIRSTEL, INC. AND U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. USW-T-98-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND AVISTA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. DBA ONE EIGHTY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. §252(e). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. USW-T-98-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND CCCID, INC. DBA CONNECT! FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. §252(e). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. USW-T-99-2 IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND DSLNET COMMUNICATIONS, LLC FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WIRELINE INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. USW-T-99-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND PATHNET, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESALE AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. USW-T-99-29 NOTICE OF AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS NOTICE OF MODIFIED PROCEDURE ORDER NO. 28370 NOTICE OF AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that on April 5, 2000, April 21, 2000, and April 12, 2000, respectively, U S WEST Communications, Inc. (U S WEST or Company) submitted amendments to five existing interconnection agreements between itself and FirsTel, Inc.; Avista Communications, Inc. dba One Eighty Communications, Inc.; CCCID, Inc. dba Connect!; DSLnet Communications, LLC; and Pathnet, Inc. for review and approval. The Joint Applications state that the amendments were reached through voluntary negotiations without resort to mediation or arbitration and are submitted for the Commission’s approval pursuant to Section 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Commission approved FirsTel’s underlying interconnection agreement on September 28, 1998, in Order No. 27753. Avista’s underlying interconnection agreement was approved by the Commission on December 18, 1998 by Order No. 27827. On March 3, 1999 in Order No. 27954, the Commission approved Connect!’s underlying interconnection agreement. DSLnet’s previously approved wireline agreement was issued by the Commission on October 19, 1999 in Order No.28180. The Commission approved Pathnet’s interconnection agreement on February 9, 2000 in Order No. 28280. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Joint Application states that FirsTel desires to access certain pre-existing combinations of unbundled network elements in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission’s decision in Docket No. 96-98 issued November 5, 1999. See In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98 (Nov. 5, 1999). YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Joint Application states that Avista desires to access pre-existing combinations of unbundled network elements in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission’s decision in Docket No. 96-98 issued November 5, 1999. See In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98 (Nov. 5, 1999). YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Joint Application states that Connect! desires to modify Section 8, Collocation, by adding terms and conditions regarding Cageless Physical Collocation and deletes Section 3 in its entirety and replaces it with new termination language. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Joint Application states that DSLnet desires to place orders for unbundled dedicated interoffice transport (UDIT), asymmetric digital subscriber loop (ADSL) and line conditioning in the form of load coil and bridge tap removals. DSLnet also desires to access certain pre-existing combinations of unbundled network elements in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission’s decision in Docket No. 96-98 issued November 5, 1999. See In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98 (Nov. 5, 1999). YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Joint Application states that Pathnet desires to amend its interconnection agreement with language that was inadvertently omitted from the agreement. The parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: Add as Section (A)1.8: This Agreement sets forth the terms, conditions and prices under which USW agrees to provide (a) services for resale and (b) certain UNEs, ancillary functions and additional features to Pathnet, all for the sole purpose of providing Telecommunications Services. The Agreement also sets forth the terms, conditions and reciprocal compensation for the exchange of Exchange Service (EAS/Local) and Exchange Access traffic between USW and Pathnet, Jointly Provided Switch Access (InterLATA and IntraLATA presubscribed/dial around) traffice and Special Access between USW, Pathnet and Interexchange Carrier (IXC) for purposes of offering Telecommunications Services. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that Section 252(e)(2) of the Act authorizes a state Commission to reject an agreement reached through voluntary negotiations only if the Commission finds that (i) the agreement (or portions thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. The parties jointly assert that the amendments to the interconnection agreements do not discriminate against other telecommunication carriers and that it is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. NOTICE OF MODIFIED PROCEDURE YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Commission has reviewed the Joint Applications and determined that the public interest may not require a hearing to consider the issues raised by the Joint Applications. Consequently, the Commission has determined that these cases may be processed under Modified Procedure, i.e., by written submission rather than by hearing. See Commission Rules of Procedure, IDAPA 31.01.01.201-.204. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Commission may not hold a hearing in these proceedings unless it receives written protests or comments opposing the use of Modified Procedure and stating why Modified Procedure should not be used. See IDAPA 31.01.01.203. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that any person desiring to state a position on these Joint Applications may file a written comment in support or opposition with the Commission within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Notice. The comment must contain a statement of reasons supporting the comment. Persons desiring a hearing must specifically request a hearing in their written comments. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that written comments concerning Case No. USW-T-98-10 should be mailed to the Commission and U S WEST and FirsTel at the addresses reflected below: COMMISSION SECRETARY IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W WASHINGTON ST BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 PETER J. BUTLER SENIOR ATTORNEY U S WEST LAW DEPARTMENT 1600 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 3206 SEATTLE, WA 98191 BRAD VANLEUR FIRSTEL, INC. 110 S. PHILLIPS, SUITE 202 SOUIX FALLS, SD 57102 YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that written comments concerning Case No. USWT98-19 should be mailed to the Commission and U S WEST and Avista at the addresses reflected below: COMMISSION SECRETARY IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE ID 83720-0074 STREET ADDRESS FOR EXPRESS MAIL: 472 W. WASHINGTON ST. BOISE, ID 83702-5983 PETER J. BUTLER SENIOR ATTORNEY U S WEST LAW DEPARTMENT 1600 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 3206 SEATTLE, WA 98191 SHARON SIERS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/REG AFFAIRS ONE EIGHTY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 118 N. STEVENS SPOKANE, WA 98201 YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that written comments concerning Case No. USWT99-2 should be mailed to the Commission and U S WEST and Connect! at the addresses reflected below: COMMISSION SECRETARY IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE ID 83720-0074 STREET ADDRESS FOR EXPRESS MAIL: 472 W. WASHINGTON ST. BOISE, ID 83702-5983 PETER J. BUTLER SENIOR ATTORNEY U S WEST LAW DEPARTMENT 1600 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 3206 SEATTLE, WA 98191 CINDY LEE CCCID, INC. DBA CONNECT! 124 W. CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 250 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that written comments concerning Case No. USW-T-99-19 should be mailed to the Commission and U S WEST and DSLnet at the addresses reflected below: COMMISSION SECRETARY IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W WASHINGTON ST BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 PETER J. BUTLER SENIOR ATTORNEY U S WEST LAW DEPARTMENT 1600 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 3206 SEATTLE, WA 98191 WENDY BLUEMLINK DIRECTOR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS DSLnet COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 545 LONG WHARF DRIVE, 5TH FLOOR NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that written comments concerning Case No. USW-T-99-29 should be mailed to the Commission and U S WEST and Pathnet at the addresses reflected below: COMMISSION SECRETARY IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W WASHINGTON ST BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 PETER J. BUTLER SENIOR ATTORNEY U S WEST LAW DEPARTMENT 1600 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 3206 SEATTLE, WA 98191 MICHAEL LUBIN GENERAL COUNSEL PATHNET, INC. 1015 31ST STREET NW, SUITE 500 WASHINGTON, DC 20007 All comments should contain the appropriate case caption(s) and the appropriate case number(s) shown on the first page of this document. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that if no written comments or protests are received within the deadline, the Commission will consider the matter on its merits and enter its Order without a formal hearing. If comments or protests are filed within the deadline, the Commission will consider them and in its discretion may set the matter for hearing or may decide the matter and issue its Order on the basis of the written positions before it. See IDAPA 31.01.01.204. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Joint Applications, the Interconnection Agreements and amendments to the Agreements together with supporting workpapers, and exhibits have been filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Commission offices. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that all proceedings in this case will be held pursuant to the Commission's jurisdiction under Title 61 and Title 62 of the Idaho Code and that the Commission may enter any final Order consistent with its authority under Title 61 or Title 62. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that all proceedings in this matter will be conducted pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Procedure, IDAPA 31.01.01.000 et seq. O R D E R IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matters set out above be processed by Modified Procedure, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Procedure 201-204; IDAPA 31.01.01.201-04. Persons interested in submitting written comments in these cases should file the comments with the Commission and the parties within 21 days of the service date of this Order. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho, this day of May 2000. DENNIS S. HANSEN, PRESIDENT MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER PAUL KJELLANDER, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Myrna J. Walters Commission Secretary bls/O:usw_interconnect_amends NOTICE OF AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS NOTICE OF MODIFIED PROCEDURE ORDER NO. 28370 1 Office of the Secretary Service Date May 5, 2000