uswt997.ccw.doc

CHERI C. COPSEY
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
[phone]
Idaho Bar No. 5142

Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W WASHINGTON
BOISE ID 83702-5983

Attorney for the Commission Staff

BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND INTELLICALL OPERATOR SERVICES, INC. DBA ILD FOR APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. §252(e). )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. USW-T-99-7

COMMENTS OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF

COMES NOW the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its attorney of record, Cheri C. Copsey, Deputy Attorney General, in response to Order No. 28060, issued June 7, 1999, submits the following comments.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, U S WEST Communications and Intellicall Operator Services, Inc. dba ILD filed a Joint Application on May 19, 1999, requesting approval of Interconnection Agreement. According to the Joint Application, the Agreement was reached through voluntary negotiations between the parties without resort to mediation or arbitration.
The Joint Application states that the agreement will allow ILD to connect to U S WEST facilities to exchange traffic, provide access to unbundled network elements, ancillary network services and retail services available for resale.
Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C.  252 (e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.S.C.  252 (e)(2)(A). If the Commission does not act to approve or reject the agreement within 90 days after its submission, the agreement is deemed approved. 47 U.S.C.  252 (e)(4). The Commission’s decision is not reviewable by the state courts. Id.
U S WEST and ILD jointly assert that the Agreement does not discriminate against other telecommunication carriers and that it is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity.
The Commission reviewed the filings of record in Case No. USW-T-99-7 and determined that the public interest may not require a hearing to consider the issues presented and that the issues raised by the Application may be processed under Modified Procedure, i.e., by written submission rather than by hearing.

STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff reviewed the language of this agreement and found the terms and conditions are not discriminatory. Staff concurs with U S WEST’s and ILD’s claim that the Interconnection Agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of the Commission, the Idaho Legislature and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and finds that the Agreement is consistent with the public interest.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve the Interconnection Agreement as filed.

DATED at Boise, Idaho, this day of June 1999.

______________________________
Cheri C. Copsey
Deputy Attorney General

Technical Staff: Wayne Hart

CCC:WH:gdk:i:word/umisc/comments/uswt997.ccw

STAFF COMMENTS 1 JUNE 28, 1999