Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19990526.doc DECISION MEMORANDUM TO: COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER MYRNA WALTERS RON LAW TONYA CLARK LYNN ANDERSON DON HOWELL STEPHANIE MILLER JOE CUSICK WAYNE HART DAVID SCOTT WORKING FILE FROM: CHERI C. COPSEY DATE: MAY 26, 1999 RE: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND INTELLICALL OPERATOR SERVICES, INC. DBA ILD; CASE NO. USW-T-99-7 On May 19, 1999, U S WEST Communications, Inc. and Intellicall Operator Services, Inc. dba ILD filed a Joint Application for approval of a negotiated wireline interconnection agreement between U S WEST and ILD. The Joint Application states that the agreement was reached through voluntary negotiations without resort to mediation or arbitration and is submitted for approval pursuant to Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C. §252 (e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.S.C. §252 (e)(2)(A). If the Commission does not act to approve or reject the agreement within 90 days after its submission, the agreement is deemed approved. 47 U.S.C. §252 (e)(4). The Commission’s decision is not reviewable by the state courts. Id. Staff recommends that the Joint Application for approval of the interconnection agreement be processed by Modified Procedure. Commission Decision: Should the Joint Application of U S WEST and ILD for approval of the interconnection agreement be processed by Modified Procedure? Cheri C. Copsey Staff: Wayne Hart M:uswt997_cc.doc DECISION MEMORANDUM 2