HomeMy WebLinkAbout981218.docxWELDON B. STUTZMAN
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
472 WEST WASHINGTON STREET
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
(208) 334-0318
Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W WASHINGTON
BOISE ID 83702-5983
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION)
OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.) CASE NO. USW-T-98-21
AND NET-TEL COMMUNICATIONS)
CORPORATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN )
AGREEMENT FOR INTERCONNECTION )
PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C.§ 252(e).)COMMENTS OF THE
)COMMISSION STAFF
)
_______________________________________________)
COMES NOW the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its Attorney of record, Weldon B. Stutzman, Deputy Attorney General, in response to Order
No. 27821, the Notice of Joint Application and Notice of Modified Procedure in Case
No. USW-T-98-21 issued December 8, 1998, submits the following comments.
On November 5, 1998, U S WEST Communications, Inc. (USW) and NET-Tel Communications Corporation (NET-Tel), a local exchange service reseller, submitted a Joint Application for approval of an agreement for service resale in accordance with Section 252(e) of the Federal Telecommunications Act. The companies indicated the agreement had been reached through voluntary negotiations and claimed the agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. They requested the Commission approve the agreement without a hearing or intervention by other parties.
Section 252 indicates that such agreements are to be submitted to state commissions for approval. Agreements adopted through negotiation may only be rejected if the state commission finds that:
(i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or
(ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff reviewed the language of this agreement and found the terms and conditions to be essentially identical to the service resale terms contained in the U S WEST-AT&T agreement previously approved by this Commission.
Staff concludes that the terms or conditions in this agreement are not discriminatory. Staff concurs with the companies’ claim that the agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of the Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and therefore is consistent with the public interest.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve this interconnection agreement as filed.
DATED at Boise, Idaho, this day of December 1998.____________________________
Weldon B. Stutzman
Technical Staff: Wayne HartDeputy Attorney General
wh:ws:gdk/uswt9821.wsw/umisc/cmts