Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000815_jh.docDECISION MEMORANDUM TO: COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER MYRNA WALTERS RON LAW LOU ANN WESTERFIELD TONYA CLARK LYNN ANDERSON DON HOWELL RANDY LOBB DAVE SCHUNKE JOE CUSICK WAYNE HART WORKING FILE FROM: JOHN R. HAMMOND DATE: AUGUST 15, 2000 RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND CHOCTAW COMMUNICATIONS INC./ DBA SMOKE SIGNAL COMMUNICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e); CASE NO. USW-T-00-19 On June 27, 2000, U S WEST Communications, Inc. and Choctaw Communications Inc./dba Smoke Signal Communications (“Smoke Signal”) filed a Joint Application for approval of a negotiated agreement for interconnection of their respective networks in accordance with the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Joint Application states that the agreement was reached through voluntary negotiations without resort to mediation or arbitration and is submitted for approval pursuant to Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. On July 12, 2000, the Commission issued a Notice of Joint Application and Notice of Modified Procedure. Order No. 28433. The Commission Staff filed its Comments on August 2, 2000. The Staff was the only party to file comments. BACKGROUND Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements and amendments to those agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(2)(A). If the Commission does not act to approve or reject the agreement within 90 days after its submission, the agreement is deemed approved. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(4). The Commission’s decision is not reviewable by the state courts. Id. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff reviewed the language of this Agreement and did not find any terms or conditions that were considered discriminatory. Staff Comments at 1. The Staff also noted that the rates and terms in this Agreement are very similar to those contained in other resale agreements submitted by U S WEST and previously approved by the this Commission. Id. at 1-2. Finally, the Staff concurred with the companies’ claim that the Agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of the Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and therefore is consistent with the public interest. Id. at 2. Based on the foregoing Staff in its Comments recommended that the Joint Application for approval of an interconnection agreement be approved. Commission Decision: Should the Joint Application of U S WEST Communications, Inc. and Smoke Signal for approval of an interconnection agreement be approved? John R. Hammond Staff: Wayne Hart DECISION MEMORANDUM 1