Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20091009LSO Memo.pdfLegislative Services Offce Idaho State Legislatue Jeff Youtz Director c: §SelÍÃldaýCít'~L~ :: ~r-_ C)::o (" ,~~:~ ..t l j--rtnõ t,-. ..MEMORAUM ~Š, j1 ~:S;~ N Germane Subcommittees for Administrative Rules Review of the ~âte a;dHouse State Affairs Committees ~:~ N Research and Legislation Staff Nugent t' ~ ~ ?Om()rT? ''1'' TO: FROM:/(VL .:-01-03 DATE: October 8, 2009 SUBJECT: Proposed Public Utilties Commission Telephone Rules 31.4 1.01 - Customer Relations Rules for Telephone Corporations Providing Local Exchange or Intrastate MTSIW ATS Service in Idaho Subject to Customer Service Regulation by the Idaho PUC Under the Public Utilties Law or the Telecommunications Act. Of 1988 (The Telephone Customer Relations Rules) - (Docket #3 1-4101 -090 1) 31.41.02 - Information to Customers of Telephone Companies (Docket #31 -41 02-090 1 - Chapter Repeal) 31.42.01 - The Idaho PUC Rules for Telephone Corporations Subject to the Rules of the Idaho PUC Under the Telecommunications Act of 1988 (rne Title 62 Telephone Corp. Rules (Docket #31-4201-0901 - Chapter Repeal) Public Utilties Commission is proposing to repeal two administrative rules chapters relating to regulation of telephone companies and moving some of the strcken language to one rules chapter. In its notice of rule making the Commission states: "The law changes are intended to encourage competition in telephone services, and the proposed rules changes are consistent with that objective by simplifying regulatory requirements and allowing companies more flexibilty to respond to customers' service requests, while maintaining some service quality standards related to basic local exchange service." Mike Nugent, Manager Research & Legislation Cathy Holland-Smith, Manager Budget & Policy Analysis Don H. Berg, Manager Legislative Audits Glenn Harrs, Manager Information Technology Statehouse, P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0054 Tel: 208-334-2475 ww.legislature.idaho.gov We don't have any technical problems with the Commission's rulemakng. We do wish the Commission and the Rules Coordinator would use one docket for the repeal and reenactment or addition of the rules replacing the repealed ones. It seems wasteful to use thee dockets to accomplish this purposè as the repeal and the new adoption are tied together. The Legislatue frequently repeals statutes and enacts statutes in their place in one bil, not two bils or thee bils. cc: Idaho Public Utilties Commission Jean D. Jewell & Weldon Stutzman