Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060703final_order_no_30084.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date July 3, 2006 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR THE STATE OF IDAHO PURSUANT TO 47 e. ~252(e) CASE NO. QWE-06- ORDER NO. 30084 In this case, the Commission is asked to approve a Type 1 and Type 2 Paging Connection Service Agreement. With this Order the Commission approves the Agreement. BACKGROUND Under the prOVlSlons of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252( e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No. 28427, companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of Section 251(b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis in original). This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. ~ 51.3. THE CURRENT APPLICATION On June 12, 2006, Qwest Corporation ("Qwest") filed an Application for approval of the Interconnection Agreement with Gem State Communications, Inc. In this case, the parties request that the Commission approve an Agreement for Type 1 (one-way final route trunk group) and Type 2 (one-way intraLA T A/interstate final route trunk group) Paging Connection Service Agreement, which will deliver calls from Qwest's end users to the paging provider s point of connection. ORDER NO. 30084 ST AFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the Application and does not find any terms or conditions that it considers to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest.Staff believes that the Application is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Accordingly, Staff recommended Commission approval of the amendment to the Agreement. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission s review is limited. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Id. Based upon our review of the Application and the Staffs recommendation, the Commission finds that the Agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and does not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that the Agreement should be approved. However, approval of this Agreement does not negate the responsibility of either of the parties to this Agreement to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or to comply with Idaho Code ~~ 62-604 and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code ~ 62-603. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Type 1 and Type 2 Paging Connection Service Agreement of Qwest Corporation and Gem State Communications, Case No. QWE-06-, is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code ~ 61- 626. ORDER NO. 30084 DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this f.....( day of July 2006. L KJ . DER, PRESIDENT ARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Je . Jewell Co mission Secretary O:QWE-O6- ORDER NO. 30084