20070808Decision Memo.pdf

DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER
COMMISSIONER SMITH
COMMISSIONER REDFORD
COMMISSION SECRETARY
LEGAL
WORKING FILE
FROM:CAROLEE HALL
DATE:JULY 30, 2007
RE:JOINT APPLICATION BETWEEN QWEST CORPORATION ("QWEST"
AND MATREAX, INC. ("MATREAX") FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS
TO THE INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANIES.
CASE NO. QWE-04-31.
BACKGROUND
Under the provision of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection
agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 US.C. 9252(e)(1). The
Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1)
discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation
of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 US.C. 9
252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No. 28427, companies voluntarily entering into
interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms, prices and conditions that do not comply with either
the FCC rules or with the provision of Section 251 (b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis in
original). This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to
approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not
comply with the requirements of (Part 51).
47 C.R. 9 51.3.
CURRENT APPLICATION
Owest and Matreax s Application for Approval of the Amendment to the Interconnection
Agreement ("Amendment"), which was approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission on
December 8, 2004 (the "Agreement"). Case No. OWE- T -04-31.
DECISION MEMORANDUM - 1 -JULY 30, 2007
The Application between Qwest and Matreax states that the parties are jointly filing and that the
Amendments were reached through voluntary negotiations without resort to mediation. The filing
amends the Exhibit A ofthe Agreement by adding Interconnection Distribution Frame (ICDF)
Collocation rates, as set forth in the Exhibit A attached with this filing.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staffhas reviewed the Application for the Amendment and does not find any terms or
conditions that it considers to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes the
Amendments are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho
Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Accordingly, Staff believes that the
Amendments merit the Commission s approval.
COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission agree?
i :udmemos/ Adopting Interconnection Agreements/QWE- T -04-31 Qwest and Matreax, Inc
DECISION MEMORANDUM - 2 -JULY 30, 2007