Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180111final_order_no_33964.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date January 11,2018 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF QWEST CORPORATION DBA )CASE NO.QWE-T-04-03 CENTURYLINK QC FOR APPROVAL OF ) AN AMENDMENT TO INTERCONNECTION )AGREEMENT WITH GRANITE )ORDER NO.33964 TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC PURSUANT ) TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) On December 1,2017,Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC (CenturyLink)and Granite Telecommunications,LLC (Granite)applied to the Commission for an Order approving an amendment to their interconnection agreementi (Amended Agreement).With this Order,the Commission approves the Amended Agreement. BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(l).The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1)discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement;or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(2)(A).As the Commission noted in Order No.28427,companies voluntarilyentering into interconnection agreements "may negotiateterms,prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of Section 25 l(b)or (c)." Order No.28427 at 11 (emphasis in original).This comports with the FCC's regulation that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of [Part 51]." 47 C.F.R.§51.3. THE APPLICATION The Application stated that the Amended Agreement was reached through voluntary negotiation without resort to mediation or arbitration and was submitted for approval pursuant to Section 252(e)of the Communications Act of 1934,as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.The Amended Agreement adds terms,conditions and rates for CLEC Requested UNE *CenturyLinkand Granite's original interconnection agreement was approved by this Commission on February 26, 2004.See Order No.29433;Case No.QWE-T-04-03. ORDER NO.33964 1 Construction (CRUNEC),as specifically set forth in Attachment 1 and Exhibit A to the Amended Agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff reviewed the Application,Amended Agreement and Attachment 1 and Exhibit A thereto,and believes the terms and conditions are not discriminatory or contrary to the public interest.Staff also believes the Amended Agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission,the Idaho Legislature,and the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.Accordingly,Staff recommended that the Commission approve the Application. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act,interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(1).The Commission's review is limited.The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity.Id. Based upon our review of the Application,Amended Agreement and Staff's recommendation,the Commission finds that the Amended Agreement is consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity and does not discriminate.Therefore,the Commission finds that the Amended Agreement should be approved.Our approval does not negate either party's responsibility to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they offer local exchange services,or to comply with Idaho Code §§62-604 and 62-606 if they provide other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code §62-603. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Agreement of Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLinkQC and Granite Telecommunications LLC,Case No.QWE-T-04-03,is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one(21)days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order.Within seven (7)days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration,any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration.See Idaho Code §§61- 626 and 62-619. ORDER NO.33964 2 DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho this day of January 2018. PA KJELLAÑDER,PMSIDENT Kl IS¾NE RAPER,CÕMMISSIONER ERIC ANDERSON,COMMISSIONER Diane M.Hanian Commission Secretary I:\Legal\LORDERS\QWETO403 sc.doc ORDER NO.33964 3