Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20031210Final Order No 29398.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date December 10, 2003 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND BRIDGEBAND COMMUNICATIONS, INc. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~ 252(e). IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND ICG TELECOM GROUP, INc. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ~ 252(e). IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INc. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~ 252(e). IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND COV COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ~ 252(e). IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND CONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ~ 252(e). IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND NEVADA WIRELESS LLC FOR APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ~ 252(e). ) CASE NO. QWE-01- ) CASE NO. QWE-02- ) CASE NO. QWE-02- ) CASE NO. USW-99- ) CASE NO. QWE-03- ) CASE NO. QWE- T -03- ) ORDER NO. 29398 In these cases the Commission is asked to approve amendments to previously approved interconnection agreements and a new interconnection agreement. ORDER NO. 29398 BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 US.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 US.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission recently noted in Order No. 28427 companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms, prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provisions of Section 251 (b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis original). This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. ~ 51.3. THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS The Commission has been asked to approve five amendments to existing interconnection agreements. The amendments are discussed in greater detail below. 1. Qwest Corporation and BridgeBand Communications, Inc. (Case No. QWE-01- In this Amendment Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing interconnection agreement. The amendment adds new rates for Exhibit A in Qwest's Statement of Generally Available Terms (SGAT). 2. Qwest Corporation and ICG Telecom Group, Inc. (Case No. QWE- T -02-3).In this Amendment Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing interconnection agreement. The amendment adds new rates for Exhibit A in Qwest' Statement of Generally Available Terms (SGAT). 3. Qwest Corporation and Centel Communications, Inc. (Case No. QWE-02-9). this Amendment Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing interconnection agreement. The amendment adds new rates for Exhibit A in Qwest' Statement of Generally Available Terms (SGA T). 4. Qwest Corporation and Covad Communications Company (Case No. USW-99-3). In this Amendment Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to ORDER NO. 29398 an existing interconnection agreement. The amendment adds new rates for Exhibit A in Qwest's Statement of Generally Available Terms (SGA T). 5. Qwest Corporation and Contact Communications, Inc. (Case No. QWE-03-3). this Amendment Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing interconnection agreement. The amendment adds new rates for Exhibit A in Qwest's Statement of Generally Available Terms (SGA T). 6. Qwest Corporation and Nevada Wireless LLC (Case No. QWE-03-21).In this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve a Type 2 wireless interconnection agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff has reviewed these Applications and did not find any terms and conditions to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that these new agreements and amendments to interconnection agreements are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act. Accordingly, Staff believes that the Applications merit the Commission s approval. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 US.C. ~ 252 (e)(l). The Commission s review is limited, however. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest convenience and necessity. Id. Based upon our review of the Applications , the Staffs recommendation and on the fact no other person commented on these Applications, the Commission finds that the amendments to previously approved interconnection agreements are consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and do not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that these Applications should be approved.However approval of these amendments does not negate the responsibility of any of the parties to these agreements to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or complying with Idaho Code ~~ 62-604 and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code ~ 62-603. ORDER NO. 29398 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the new interconnection agreement and amendments to interconnection agreements discussed above be approved. Terms of the agreements that are not already in effect shall be effective as of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendment to a previously approved interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and BridgeBand Communications, Inc. Case No. QWE-01-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendment to a previously approved interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and ICG Telecom Group, Inc., Case No. QWE-02-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendment to a previously approved interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Centel Communications, Inc., Case No. QWE-02-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendment to a previously approved interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Covad Communications Company, Case No. USW-99-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendment to a previously approved interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Contact Communications, Inc., Case No. QWE-03-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Nevada Wireless LLC, Case No. QWE-03-, is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order) or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in these Case Nos. QWE- 01-, QWE-02-, QWE-02-, USW-99-, QWE-03-, and QWE-03-21 may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in these cases. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code ~ ~ 61-626 and 62-619. ORDER NO. 29398 DONE byOrder of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho, this to rk day of December 2003. ~ J~~~ MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: O:QWETO126- QWETO203 - QWETO209 - USWT9903 - QWETO303 - QWETO321 ORDER NO. 29398