HomeMy WebLinkAbout20030731Application.pdf.- . -. ,
t ",.
:.Cc::.i '.'t.L.:.
5 TO E L
~~,
!IU:=C;
~...
101 S. Capilol Boulevard. Suite 1900
Boise. Idaho 83702
main 208.389.9000
LnG3 JUL 30 Pfll 4: 56 fax 208.389.9040
www.stoel.com
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
c. -ILI..
UTlLY'Tlj~S ' cm1i'c11SSION
July 30, 2003
MARY S. HOBSON
Direct (208) 387-4277
mshobson0stoel.com
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington
Boise, ill 83702-5983
RE:Docket No. QWE-O3-
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed for filing with this Commission is an original and seven (7) copies of the following:
J oint Application of Qwest Corporation and Commission Staff;
Declaration of John F. Souba in Support of the Joint Application of Qwest Corporation
and the Commission Staff; and
Declaration of Beverly A. Barker in Support of the Joint Application of Qwest
Corporation and the Commission Staff.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
tro rtf
0 b s:t:(fO
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
:blg
Enclosurescc: Service List
Oregon
Washington
California
Boise-160014.10029164-00095
Utah
Idaho
-'~' ,. :. ;.
: '. to. Li ,-, " I..
r~'"
Mary S. Hobson (ISB #2142)
Stoel Rives LLP
101 South Capitol Boulevard - Suite 1900
Boise, ID 83702
Telephone: (208) 389-9000
Facsimile: (208) 389-9040
mshobson(2V,stoel.com
~l~.f_.
ZO03 JUL 30 Pr1 ~: 51
i '
. C
: . .
" I :
:; ~. .
UTlU i IL::) :,,;ur',r'1i~~iUN
Adam L. Sherr (WSBA #25291)
Qwest
1600 7th Avenue - Room 3206
Seattle, WA 98191
Telephone: (206) 723-6263
Facsimile: (206) 343-4040
asherr~qwest.com
Attorneys for Qwest Corporation
Donald L. Howell, II (ISB #3366)
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Telephone: (208) 334-0312
Facsimile: (208) 334-3762
dhowell~puc.state.id.
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION
AND THE COMMISSION STAFF FOR
APPROVAL OF THE PARTIES'
AGREEMENT REGARDING TOLL
RESTRICTION SERVICE IN QWEST'
SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN IDAHO
SERVICE AREAS
CASE NO. QWE-O3-
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
Qwest Corporation (Qwest) and the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission
(Staff) Gointly known as "the Parties ), by and through their respective attorneys of record, file
this Joint Application for approval of their agreement concerning the regulatory status of
Qwest's service known as "Toll Restriction.
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
OVERVIEW
1. Toll Restriction prohibits access to long distance carriers from any line on which
it is installed. Briefly, the Parties propose that Toll Restriction be subject to the Commission
Title 61 jurisdiction when offered to residence customers and business customers with five or
fewer lines billed to a single location; the monthly rates for this service be adjusted; that there be
no installation charge for the service when it is ordered by residence customers; and the monthly
rates for Toll Restriction be the same for both northern and southern Idaho.Qwest will
individually notify existing Toll Restriction customers of the proposed changes. The parties
propose an effective date for these changes of October 1 2003.
DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
2. Pursuant to Idaho Public Utilities Commission Rule 41 , IDAPA 31.01.01.41
Qwest designates its attorneys, Mary S. Hobson and Adam L. Sherr, and the Commission Staff
designates its attorney, Donald L. Howell, II, as their respective representatives for this
proceeding. Contact information for the Parties' representatives is provided on page one of this
Application.
BACKGROUND
3. The question of the appropriate regulatory status of Toll Restriction in southern
Idaho was prominent in U S WEST Communications, Inc.s 1997 rate case.1 U S WEST
Communications was a predecessor to Qwest and will hereinafter for purposes of convenience be
referred to as "Qwest." During the rate case proceedings Qwest took the position that Toll
Restriction was offered and properly categorized as a price-deregulated service under Title 62
In the Matter of the Application of U WEST Communications, Inc. for Authority to Increase Its Rates and
Charges for Regulated Title 61 Services Case No. USW-96-
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
Idaho Code ("Title 62 service ), while Staff insisted that the service must be priced regulated
under Title 61 , Idaho Code.
4. In Order No. 27100, issued August 12, 1997, the Commission concluded that Toll
Restriction should be characterized as a price-regulated service under Title 61 , Idaho Code.
Qwest filed a timely Petition for Reconsideration challenging this decision pursuant to Idaho
Code 9 61-626. Reconsideration was subsequently denied and Qwest filed a Notice of Appeal
on December 16, 1997. Thereafter, Qwest and Staff filed various motions and responses relating
to determining the appropriate scope of the record for appeal. On July 27, 1998, the Commission
issued Order No. 27659 granting Qwest rehearing regarding the regulatory status of Toll
Restriction. The parties filed a motion with the Idaho Supreme Court asking that the appeal be
suspended until November 11 , 1998.
5. On September 2, 1998, Qwest and Staff filed a document entitled "Fourth
Stipulation and Settlement" (the "Original Stipulation ), which provided that the parties agreed
that Toll Restriction should remain a Title 62 product, but be offered under certain mutually
agreed terms to residence and single line business customers. These were: (a) residence and
single-line business customers ordering the service would be assessed a non-recurring charge of
$13.50 except that the non-recurring charge would be waived on the first line for residence
customers initiating local service for the first time; (b) residence customers would be charged a
monthly recurring charge of $0., and single line business customers a monthly charge of
$1.00; and (c) customers eligible for the Idaho Telecommunications Service Assistance Program
(IT SAP) would receive Toll Restriction at no charge. The Original Stipulation further provided
that its terms would remain in effect for three years from the date of the Commission s approval
of its terms and that the Original Stipulation would have no precedential effect on the regulatory
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
status of Toll Restriction. Finally the Original Stipulation called for Qwest to voluntarily dismiss
its Supreme Court appeal in the event that the Commission approved its terms.
6. On October 27, 1998, a majority of the Commission approved the terms of the
Original Stipulation in Order No. 27785. That Order provided that the term of the stipulation
should run from the effective date ofthe Order, which was November 17, 1998.
7. Since November 1998 , Qwest has offered Toll Restriction as a Title 62 service
and has acknowledged the applicability of the terms and conditions provided in the Original
Stipulation. However, based upon a customer complaint, Qwest and Staff discovered that Qwest
had inadvertently assessed the non-recurring charge on new customers ordering the service in
conjunction with basic local exchange service and had misbilled some ITSAP customers.
Consequently, Qwest and Staff executed another stipulation dated September 14, 2001. This
stipulation described corrective measures Qwest would take to avoid imposition of improper Toll
Restriction charges, provided refunds to affected customers, and extended the terms of the
Original Stipulation approved in Order No. 27785 through calendar year 2002. This latter
stipulation was approved by the Commission in Order No. 28862, dated October 1 2001.
8. In calendar year 2003, Qwest continues to offer Toll Restriction under the terms
and conditions provided in the Original Stipulation on the basis of an informal agreement as the
Parties explored possibilities for settling the ongoing controversy concerning the regulatory
status and appropriate terms for the provision of Toll Restriction.
9. The recurring rates charged for Toll Restriction in southern Idaho have remained
unchanged since 1998. In most instances, the rates proposed herein are significantly lower than
the rates in the twelve (12) other states in Qwest's territory where a monthly charge is imposed
for Toll Restriction.
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
THE NEW AGREEMENT AND JOINT APPLICATION
10. As a result of the recent negotiations between Staff and Qwest and in recognition
of the foregoing, the Parties have now reached a new Agreement concerning the appropriate
regulatory status of Toll Restriction in southern Idaho.The new Agreement contains the
following terms, which the Parties ask the Commission to approve pursuant to this Application:
(a) Qwest will file a provision for its Basic Local Exchange Tariff in southern
Idaho offering Toll Restriction on the terms provided herein and will file a
revision to its Title 62 services Catalog that removes Toll Restriction as a
service offered to residence customers or business customers with five or
fewer lines billed to a single billing location. A copy of Qwest's proposed
changes to its southern Idaho Basic Local Exchange Tariff provisions
relating to Toll Restriction are attached hereto as Attachment A. A copy
of Qwest's proposed changes to its southern Idaho Network and Exchange
Services Catalog is attached as Attachment B.
(b) The monthly recurring rate for Toll Restriction will be changed to $.75 for
residence and $2.00 for business customers in both northern and southern
Idaho. Qwest will provide individual notice of the proposed rate changes
to all Toll Restriction customers. A copy of the changes to Qwest's
Exchange and Network Services Tariff for northern Idaho is attached as
Attachment C.
(c) Qwest's rate filings for northern and southern Idaho will also reflect the
elimination of the respective $24.00 and $13.50 nonrecurring charges for
residential customers. The filing will also provide that the nonrecurring
charge of $24.00 for northern Idaho business customers will be reduced to
the southern Idaho nonrecurring charge of$13.50.
(d) ITSAP customers will not be charged for Toll Restriction.
( e) Staff will not seek a reduction in Title 61 Toll Restriction rates outside of
a general rate case in either northern or southern Idaho.
11. Qwest and Staff agreed to the foregoing changes to Qwest's Toll Restriction
offerings in northern and southern Idaho to create consistent pricing between the two
jurisdictions and to eliminate the ongoing controversy about the status of Toll Restriction in
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
southern Idaho. The Parties agree that the proposed rates are reasonable and recommend an
effective date of October 1 , 2003.
12. The Parties agree that by entering into the Agreement described in paragraph 10
of this Application they do not waive any arguments they may have about the appropriate
interpretation of the relevant statutes or the scope of Title 61 rate regulation. The Parties further
agree that their Agreement as described herein should not be construed as precedent for any
position espoused by either party except as expressly stated in this Application.
13. Supporting this Application are the Declarations of John F. Souba and Beverly A.
Barker. Copies of the notices Qwest intends to send to its customers in northern and southern
Idaho advising them ofthe proposed price changes are attached to Mr. Souba s Declaration.
14. Pursuant to IDAPA 31.41.02.102.03 attached hereto as Attachment D is a copy of
the press release created by Qwest to advise customers of the proposed rate changes.
15. The Parties respectfully request that the Commission process this matter under
Modified Procedure with a 28-day comment cycle.
PRAYER
Based on the foregoing, Staff and Qwest respectfully request that the Commission
enter its order as follows:
(a) Processing this Application under Modified Procedure;
(b) Approving Qwest's proposed additions to its Basic Local Exchange Tariff
offering Toll Restriction as a Title 61 service under the rates and
conditions provided herein;
(c) Approving Qwest'proposed modifications to its northern Idaho
Exchange and Network Services Tariff; and
(d) Granting such further relief as the Commission deems appropriate.
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
Respectfully submitted thi ay of July 2003.
Attorney for the Commission Staff
-- -- -
Adam L. Sherr
Qwest
Attorneys for Qwest Corporation
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this ~ay of July, 2003, I served JOINT APPLICATION
OF QWEST CORPORATION AND COMMISSION STAFF as follows:
Jean Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Phone: (208) 334-0300
Fax: (208) 334-3762
ii ewell~puc.state.id.
Hand Delivery
U. S. Mail
Overnight Delivery
Facsimile
Email
Donald L. Howell, II (ISB #3366)
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Telephone: (208) 334-0312
Facsimile: (208) 334-3762
Hand Delivery
U. S. Mail
Overnight Delivery
Facsimile
Email
Adam L. Sherr (WSBA #25291)
Qwest
1600 ih Avenue - Room 3206
Seattle, W A 98191
Telephone: (206) 723-6263
Facsimile: (206) 343-4040
asherr~qwest.com
Hand Delivery
U. S. Mail
Overnight Delivery
Facsimile
Email
~A?~
Brandi L. Gearhart, PLS
Legal Secretary to Mary S. Hobson
Stoel Rives LLP
JOINT APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND
COMMISSION STAFF
EXHIBIT"
Qwest Corporation
Basic Local Exchange
Tariff SECTION 1
Page 8
Release 2
Effective:
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
1.2
1.17
10.4
10.4.4
10.4.
20.
1. ApPLICATION AND REFERENCE
T ABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'
SECTION 8. CONNECTIONS OF PREMISES EQUIPMENT
To TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
CONNECTIONS OF EQUIPMENT, COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS AND PREMISES WIRE
..........................................,........
SECTION 9. CENTRAL OFFICE SERVICES
DIAL SWITCHING SYSTEMS
.............................................................
CENTREX21 SERVICE
................................................................
SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
SCREENING/REsTRICTION SERVICES
...............................................
TOLL RESTRICTION
.....................................................................
PAY PER CALL RESTRICTION
........................................,..........
SECTION 20. FACILITIES FOR RADIO CARRIERS
INTERCONNECTION..........................................................................
ADVICE No. 2003-xx-
8102003-022
PAGE
(N)
(T)
Qwest CorporationBasic Local Exchange
Tariff SECTION 1
Page 12
Release 3
Effective:
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
1. ApPLICATION AND REFERENCE
1.3 SUBJECT INDEX (Cont'
Table of Contents ......
............. ...... .......... ....................... ... .............. ............
Tariff Format
..............................................................................................
Telephone Assistance Programs .................................................................
Temporary Construction .............................................................................
Temporary Development Charge ...............................................................
Temporary Suspension of Service - Customer Initiated..............................
Termination of Service - Company Initiated ..................,...........................
Termination of Service ...............................................................................
Toll Restriction............................................................................................
Touch-Tone Calling Service .......................................................................
Trademarks, Service Marks and Trade Names............................................
Transfer of Service Between Customers ....................................................
Tribal Lifeline..............................................................................................
Universal Service Fund Surcharge..............................................................
Unusual Installations........... .............
.... ........................ ..... .........................
Use of Service
......................................................,.....................................
Use of Telephone Alarm Reporting Devices
.............................................
Vacation Service .........................................................................................
ADVICE No. 2003-xx-
8102003-022
SECTION
104
(N)
104
Qwest CorporationBasic Local Exchange
Tariff
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
SECTION 10
Index Page 1
Release 2
Effective:
SUBJECT
10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
Pay Per Call Restriction ..................................,...........................................
Screening/Restriction Services....................................................................
Toll Restriction Service...............................................................................
ADVICE No. 2003-xx-
SID2003-022
PAGE
(T)
(N)
Qwest Corporation
Basic Local Exchange
Tariff SECTION 10
Page 1
Release 2 I
Effective: l i
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
10.4
10.4.4
SCREENING/RESTRICTION SERVICES
TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE
A. Description
1. Toll Restriction Service (TRS) prevents access to the network when one of the
following types of calls is attempted:
. 1+IntraLATA
. 1+InterLATA
. 011+
. 1O1XXXX1+, 101XXXXO11+, 1O1XXXX01+, 1O1XXXXO+
. 1+900, 1 +976, 0+900, 0+976
. 0 , 00+, 01+
. 1+555-1212 0+555-1212, 1+NPA+555-1212, 0+NPA+555-1212, 0+411
US WEST COMPLETE-CALL
When a restricted call is attempted, the caller will hear a pre-recorded
announcement indicating that the call cannot be completed.
2. TRS does not block: local calls; calls to 800 and 888-type toll services; calls to
950 numbers, telephone repair service or 911 emergency services, and 555-1212
411 and 1-411.
B. Terms and Conditions
1. TRS is not available with Pay Per Call Restriction, which blocks calls to 900 and
976 type services offered by Information Providers.
2. TRS is not available on multiparty lines.
3. TRS may be bypassed by some long distance carriers, who do not access a billing
validation system.
4. TRS is designed to prevent certain types of calls from being completed.
However, this service will not prevent all toll charges that may be billed to a
customer account. Provision of TRS does not alleviate the customer
responsibility for payment of completed toll calls charged to their line.
5. TRS will be placed on the customer s line(s) by the date the service order is due.
6. Toll Restriction will be provided at no charge to qualifying Telephone Assistance
Program customers.
(M) Material moved to Page 3.
ADVICE No. 2003-xx-
8102003-022
(M)
(N)
(N)
Qwest CorporationBasic Local Exchange
Tariff
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
SECTION 10
Page 2
~~~f::~ ~
10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
10.4 SCREENING/RESTRICTION SERVICES
10.4.4 TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE (Cont'
C. Rates and Charges
Rates and charges for this service are in addition to the rates and charges for the
class, type and grade of service furnished.
USOC
NONRECURRING
CHARGE
MONTHL Y
RATE
. Business (1)
- Each individual line or
trunk equipped $13.$2.RTY
. Residence
- Each individual line
equipped RTY
(1)Customers subscribing to multi-line business service with more than five lines
should see the Exchange and Network Services catalog for rates.
ADVICE No. 2003-xx-
8102003-022
(~)
(N)
(N)
(N)
Qwest CorporationBasic Local Exchange
Tariff
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
SECTION 10
Page 3
Release 1
Effective:
10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
10.4
10.4.
SCREENING/REsTRICTION SERVICES (Cont'd)
PAY PER CALL RESTRICTION
A. Description
Pay Per Call Restriction prevents calls made from individual residence and
business access lines from reaching information services (for example, those
reached by dialing 900).
B. Terms and Conditions
Pay Per Call Restriction is offered to:
. Single party service
PBX trunk
CENTRON service
C. Rates and Charges
. Per line
Initial installation
- Subsequent installation
on same line
(M) Material moved from Page 1.
ADVICE No. 2003-xx-
8102003-022
USOC
RTVX9
RTVX9
NON-
RECURRING
CHARGE
MONTHLY
RATE
$13.
(T)(M)
(M)
EXHIBIT
Qwest CorporationExchange and Network
Services Catalog SECTION 10
Page 8
Release 2
Effective: 1
SOUTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
10.4 SCREENING/REsTRICTION SERVICES
10.4.TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE (Cont'
C. Rates and Charges
Rates and charges for this service are in addition to the rates and charges for the
class, type and grade of service furnished.
USOC
NONRECURRING
CHARGE
. Business
- Each individual line or
trunk equipped RTY $13.
MONTHLY
RATE
$2.00 (I)
NOTICE
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
SID2003-023
(D)
(D)
EXHIBIT
Qwest CorporationExchange and Network
Services Tariff SECTION 10
Page 5
Release 3
Effective:
NORTHERN IDAHO
Issued:
10. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE OFFERINGS
10.4
10.4.
SCREENINGIRESTRICTION SERVICES (Cont'
TOLL RESTRICTION
A. Description
Toll Restriction prevents access to the toll network, including access to 900 type
toll services. COMPLETE-CALL is not available on a toll restricted line.
When customers dial "0" or "1" from a restricted line the call will be diverted to a
Company-provided intercept announcement.
B. Terms and Conditions
1. Provision of Toll Restriction Service does not alleviate customer s responsibility
for completed toll calls.
2. Toll Restriction will be provided at no charge to qualifying Telephone Assistance
Program customers.
C. Rates and Charges
Rates and charges for this service are in addition to the rates and charges for the
class, type and grade of service furnished.
NONRECURRING MONTHLY
USOC CHARGE RATE
. Business, per line/PBX Trunk RTY $13.50 (R)$2.00 (I)
. Residence, per line RTY (R)75 (I)
ADVICE No. 2003-XX-
NID2003-009
EXHIBIT
Northern Idaho Press Release
Qwest.
Spirit of Service
QWEST, PUC STAFF PROPOSE CHANGES TO RATE AND TERMS FOR QWEST
TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE
BOISE , July 30, 2003 - Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE:Q) and the
staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) today jointly filed an application
regarding the regulation of Qwest's toll restriction service. If approved, the IPUC would
have ongoing regulatory oversight of toll restriction , while allowing Qwest the ability to
adjust the monthly charges for the service. Toll restriction is an optional service that
allows customers to restrict toll calls from being placed on their phone lines.
Under the joint proposal , the price of toll restriction will be set at $0.75 per month for
residence lines and $2.00 per month for business lines. Any future changes to the rates
would again require approval from the IPUC.
The agreement also establishes the same price for the service in Qwest's southern and
northern Idaho operations. As part of the joint filing, Qwest will eliminate the one-time
charge for toll restriction service for residence customers. The proposed Idaho
residence monthly rate is the lowest of the 13. states where Qwest charges a fee for toll
restriction service.
The proposed increase in the monthly charge for toll restriction would be partially offset
by reductions in the one-time charge to establish the service. Qwest will no longer
charge one-time fees to establish toll restriction service for residential customers, and
the one-time fee for business customers will be reduced from $24.00 to $13.50. In
addition , Qwest recently made an investment of over $7 million in a new central office
switching center in Lewiston for which it has not sought recovery through an increase in
local service rates.
The financial impact of this joint application will be less than one-tenth of one percent
increase to Qwest's current annual revenues in Idaho.
Toll Restriction Rate Changes
Residence Business
Old New Old New
Monthly $0.$0.$1.$2.
One Time $24.$24.$13.
Customers who receive support from the Idaho Telecommunications Service Assistance
Program are not charged for toll restriction service.
Qwest hopes to have an IPUC decision on the application within the next 60 days. The
company is sending an individual notice to all current toll restriction customers of the
pending application and the proposed new rates and terms.
The company s application is a proposal which is subject to public review and an IPUC
decision. A copy of the company s application is available at the offices of the Company
and the IPUC and may be reviewed on the IPUC's state website.
About Qwest
Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE: Q) is a leading provider of voice,
video and data services to more than 25 million customers. The company s 50 000
employees are committed to the "Spirit of Service" and providing world-class services
that exceed customers' expectations for quality, value and reliability. For more
information , please visit the Qwest Web site at www.qwestcom
###
This release may contain projections and other forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements
may differ materially from actual future events or results. Readers are referred to the documents filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, specifically the most recent reports which identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to
differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: unanticipated delays in completing the
process of our restatement of historical financial statements and related audits; the duration and extent of the current economic
downturn in our 14-state local service area, including its effect on our customers and suppliers; the effects of our anticipated
restatement of historical financial statements including delays in or restrictions on our ability to access the capital markets or other
adverse effects to our business and financial position; our substantial indebtedness, and our inability to complete any efforts to de-
lever our balance sheet through asset sales or other transactions; any adverse outcome of the SEC's current investigation into our
accounting policies, practices and procedures and certain transactions; any adverse outcome of the current investigation by the U.
Attorney s office in Denver into certain matters relating to us; adverse results of increased review and scrutiny by Congress
regulatory authorities, media and others (including any internal analyses) of financial reporting issues and practices or otherwise; the
failure of our chief executive and chief financial officers to provide certain certifications relating to certain public filings; delays in
making required public filings with the SEC; rapid and significant changes in technology and markets; any adverse developments in
commercial disputes or legal proceedings, including any adverse outcome of current or future legal proceedings related to matters
that are the subject of governmental investigations, and, to the extent not covered by insurance, if any, our inability to satisfy any
resulting obligations from funds available to us, if any; our future ability to provide interLATA services within our 14-state local
service area; potential fluctuations in quarterly results; volatility of our stock price; intense competition in the markets in which we
compete, including the likelihood of certain of our competitors emerging from bankruptcy court protection or otherwise reorganizing
their capital structure and competing effectively against us; changes in demand for our products and services; dependence on new
product development and acceleration of the deployment of advanced new services, such as broadband data, wireless and video
services, which could require substantial expenditure of financial and other resources in excess of contemplated levels; higher than
anticipated employee levels, capital expenditures and operating expenses; adverse changes in the regulatory or legislative
environment affecting our business; and changes in the outcome of future events from the assumed outcome included in our
significant accounting policies.
The information contained in this release is a statement of Owest's present intention, belief or expectation and is based upon
among other things, the existing regulatory environment, industry conditions, market conditions and prices, the economy in general
and Owest's assumptions. Owest may change its intention, belief or expectation, at any time and without notice, based upon any
changes in such factors, in Owest's assumptions or otherwise. The cautionary statements contained or referred to in this release
should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that Owest or persons acting on
its behalf may issue. This release may include analysts' estimates and other information prepared by third parties for which Owest
assumes no responsibility.
Owest undertakes no obligation to review or confirm analysts' expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
By including any information in this release, Owest does not necess:trily acknowledge that disclosure of such information is required
by applicable law or that the information is material.
The Owest logo is a registered trademark of, and CyberCenter is a service mark of, Owest Communications International Inc. in the
S. and certain other countries.
Contacts:Media Contact:
Mike Reynoldson
208-385-2154
mxreyno~Qwest. com
Investor Contact:
Stephanie Comfort
800-567 - 7296
I R(Q;)qwest. com
Southern Idaho Press Release
Qwest.
Spirit of Service
QWEST, PUC STAFF PROPOSE CHANGES TO RATE AND TERMS FOR QWEST
TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE
BOISE, July 30,2003 - Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE:Q) and the
staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) today jointly filed an application
regarding the regulation of Qwest's toll restriction service. If approved , the IPUC would
have ongoing regulatory oversight of toll restriction , while allowing Qwest the ability to
adjust the monthly charges for the service. Toll restriction is an optional service that
allows customers to restrict toll calls from being placed on their phone lines.
Under the joint proposal , the price of toll restriction will be set at $0.75 per month for
residence lines and $2.00 per month for business lines. Any future changes to the rates
would again require approval from the IPUC.
The agreement also establishes the same price for the service in Qwest's southern and
northern Idaho operations. As part of the joint filing, Qwest will eliminate the one-time
charge for toll restriction service for residence customers. The proposed Idaho
residence monthly rate is the lowest of the 11 states where Qwest charges a fee for toll
restriction service.
The proposed increase in the monthly charge for toll restriction would be partially offset
by reductions in the one-time charge to establish the service. Qwest will no longer
charge one-time fees to establish toll restriction service for residential customers.
The financial impact of this joint application will be less than two-tenths of one percent
increase to Qwest's current annual revenues in Idaho.
Toll Restriction Rate Changes
Residence Business
Old New Old New
Monthly $0.$0.$1.$2.
One Time $13.$13.$1 3.
Customers who receive support from the Idaho Telecommunications Service Assistance
Program are not charged for toll restriction service.
Qwest hopes to have an IPUC decision on the application within the next 60 days. The
company is sending an individual notice of the pending application and the proposed
new rates and terms to all current toll restriction customers..
The company s application is a proposal that is subject to public review and an IPUC
decision. A copy of the company s application is available at Qwest offices and the
IPUC and may be reviewed on the IPUC's state website.
About Qwest
Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE: Q) is a leading provider of voice
video and data services to more than 25 million customers. The company s 50 000
employees are committed to the "Spirit of Service" and providing world-class services
that exceed customers' expectations for quality, value and reliability. For more
information , please visit the Qwest Web site at www.qwestcom
###
This release may contain projections and other forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements
may differ materially from actual future events or results. Readers are referred to the documents filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, specifically the most recent reports which identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to
differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: unanticipated delays in completing the
process of our restatement of historical financial statements and related audits; the duration and extent of the current economic
downturn in our 14-state local service area, including its effect on our customers and suppliers; the effects of our anticipated
restatement of historical financial staternents including delays in or restrictions on our ability to access the capital markets or other
adverse effects to our business and financial position; our substantial indebtedness, and our inability to complete any efforts to de-
lever our balance sheet through asset sales or other transactions; any adverse outcorne of the SEC's current investigation into our
accounting policies, practices and procedures and certain transactions; any adverse outcome of the current investigation by the U.
Attorneys office in Denver into certain rnatters relating to us; adverse results of increased review and scrutiny by Congress
regulatory authorities, media and others (including any internal analyses) of financial reporting issues and practices or otherwise; the
failure of our chief executive and chief financial officers to provide certain certifications relating to certain public filings; delays in
making required public filings with the SEC; rapid and significant changes in technology and markets; any adverse developments in
commercial disputes or legal proceedings , including any adverse outcome of current or future legal proceedings related to matters
that are the subject of governrnental investigations, and, to the extent not covered by insurance, if any, our inability to satisfy any
resulting obligations frorn funds available to us, if any; our future ability to provide interLA T A services within our 14-state local
service area; potential fluctuations in quarterly results; volatility of our stock price; intense competition in the markets in which we
corn pete, including the likelihood of certain of our competitors emerging from bankruptcy court protection or otherwise reorganizing
their capital structure and cornpeting effectively against us; changes in demand for our products and services; dependence on new
product development and acceleration of the deployment of advanced new services, such as broadband data, wireless and video
services, which could require substantial expenditure of financial and other resources in excess of contemplated levels; higher than
anticipated employee levels, capital expenditures and operating expenses; adverse changes in the regulatory or legislative
environment affecting our business; and changes in the outcome of future events from the assumed outcome included in our
significant accounting policies.
The inforrnation contained in this release is a statement of Qwest's present intention , belief or expectation and is based upon
arnong other things, the existing regulatory environment, industry conditions, market conditions and prices, the economy in general
and Qwest's assumptions. Qwest may change its intention, belief or expectation, at any time and without notice, based upon any
changes in such factors, in Qwest's assumptions or otherwise. The cautionary statements contained or referred to in this release
should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that Qwest or persons acting on
its behalf may issue. This release may include analysts' estimates and other information prepared by third parties for which Qwest
assumes no responsibility.
Qwest undertakes no obligation to review or confirm analysts' expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
By including any information in this release, Qwest does not necessarily acknowledge that disclosure of such information is required
by applicable law or that the information is material.
The Qwest logo is a registered trademark of, and CyberCenter is a service mark of, Qwest Communications International Inc. in the
S. and certain other countries.
Contacts:Media Contact:
Mike Reynoldson
208-385-2154
mxrevno(Ci).qwest. com
Investor Contact:
Stephanie Comfort
800-567 -7296
IR~qwest.com
" '-'"
'1/'\(cb:..i"L.
FiLED
Mary S. Hobson (ISB #2142)
Stoel Rives LLP
101 South Capitol Boulevard - Suite 1900
Boise, ID 83702
Telephone: (208) 389-9000
Facsimile: (208) 389-9040
mshobson~stoel.com
ZO03 JUL 30 P~1~: 58
. ;,
; t!iJ,
UflLI TiES cm'H"'dSSiOH
Adam L. Sherr (WSBA #25291)
Qwest
1600 ih Avenue - Room 3206
Seattle, W A 98191
Telephone: (206) 723-6263
Facsimile: (206) 343-4040
asherr~qwest. com
Attorneys for Qwest Corporation
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND THE
COMMISSION STAFF FOR APPROVAL OF
THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT REGARDING
TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE IN QWEST'
SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN IDAHO
SERVICE AREAS
Case. No. QWE-O3-
DECLARATION OF JOHN F. SOUBA IN
SUPPORT OF THE JOINT APPLICATION
OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE
COMMISSION STAFF
, JOHN F. SOUBA, make this declaration based upon my personal knowledge. I am
over the age of 18 and am otherwise competent to testify as to the matters set forth herein.
I joined Qwest Corporation (then known as "Mountain Bell" and subsequently as
U S WEST Communications ) in 1979 and have held a variety of management positions with
the Company. Since 1988 I have been employed in the Policy and Law Department and I
currently hold the position oflead Idaho Regulatory Affairs manager.
For ease of reference I will refer to Qwest Corporation and its predecessors as "Qwest" or "the Company
DECLARATION OF JOHN F. SOUBA IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 1
Boise-\59844.\0029164-00012
I became aware that the regulatory status of Qwest's service known as Toll
Restriction was controversial during the Company s 1996 rate case.2 At that time Qwest
defended its position that Toll Restriction was not properly categorized as subject to the
Commission s Title 61 jurisdiction. Qwest maintained that position through a motion for
reconsideration of the Commission s rate case final order. Subsequently, the Company filed an
appeal ofthe Commission s order which retained T61 (price-regulating) status ofthe service to
the Idaho Supreme Court. The litigation over the issues related to Toll Restriction consumed a
considerable amount of time and resources for both the Company and the Commission.
Qwest and the Commission Staff were ultimately able to reach a compromise on
the Toll Restriction issues that was reflected in a filing in the rate case titled
, "
Fourth Stipulation
and Settlement" which resolved the Supreme Court appeal. The agreement reached at that time
represented a reasonable compromise and it was approved by the Commission. Nevertheless, the
agreement only "put off' the ultimate questions about the regulatory status of Toll Restriction for
a period of three years.
After the above-described agreement was reached, it came to the attention of
Qwest and Staff that inadvertently the Company had not properly implemented the agreement
that had been approved by the Commission. After working through the issues with Staff, the
Company agreed to measures designed to correct billing errors and compensate affected
customers. That arrangement also entailed an extension ofthe terms ofthe Fourth Stipulation
and Settlement approved in Order No. 27785 through calendar year 2002. Once again, the
ultimate resolution of the regulatory status of Toll Restriction in southern Idaho was put off for
another day.
In the Matter of the Application of U WEST Communications, Inc. for Authority to Increase Its Rates and
Charges for Regulated Title 61 Services Case No. USW-96-
DECLARATION OF JOHN F. SOUBA IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 2
Boise-159844,10029164-00012
Since the end of calendar year 2002, Qwest has continued to operate as if the
Fourth Stipulation and Settlement were still in effect as it worked with the Commission Staff to
determine whether a more permanent solution to the Toll Restriction issues could be found.
was obvious to Qwest and the Staffthat the matter has taken an inordinate amount of time and
effort and demands a resolution.
Qwest has been concerned throughout this process about the level of the Toll
Restriction monthly rates that were established by the Commission in Qwest's 1997 rate case.
Although Qwest agreed to maintain those rates in the various stipulations that I described above
this has been a continuing issue of concern. The Toll Restriction rates in effect prior to the rate
case were decreased by the rate case order and have not increased since 1998. Further, attached
hereto as Attachment 1 is a chart showing the rate levels for Toll Restriction in Qwest's other
twelve jurisdictions in which the service is offered for a charge. This chart demonstrates that the
current Idaho Toll Restriction rates are very low compared with other states and that the rates
proposed in the Joint Application are very reasonable as compared to these rate levels.
The agreement that is described in the Joint Application represents what Qwest
hopes will be the final chapter in this long controversy. Qwest believes that the agreement is
reasonable for a variety of reasons. First, Qwest agrees that Toll Restriction will be offered
going forward as a Commission price-regulated service to Title 61 customers. This is a big
concession on Qwest's part because it has long held the position that the service cannot be
properly characterized as "basic local exchange service" and that it could not be "clawed back"
under Idaho Code g 62-605(5) because it was not offered prior to the effective date of the statute.
If this Commission approves the Joint Application and orders the relief requested by the parties
these issues will not have to be further litigated before the Commission or the courts.
DECLARATION OF JOHN F. SOUBA IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 3
Boise-159844,10029164-00012
Qwest also believes, as I have said, that the proposed rates are very reasonable
although they do represent an increase to the monthly recurring rates for customers in both
northern and southern Idaho. However, as Attachment 1 indicates the rates are still on the low
end ofthe scale of rates throughout Qwest's territory. In addition , in northern Idaho the
proposed rates include a decrease to the business line non-recurring charge of $1 0.50. In
addition, Qwest will waive the non-recurring charge for all residence customers who order Toll
Restriction. Finally, in Northern Idaho , Qwest has not yet sought any recovery of a $7 million
investment in a new central office switching center in Lewiston. And, customers who qualify for
the Idaho Telecommunications Service Assistance Program (ITSAP) will receive Toll
Restriction without charge. These various measures were designed to assure that the most
vulnerable residence customers are able to obtain Toll Restriction and use it, as long as they need
, at no charge in the case of ITSAP customers or at a very affordable rate for all others.
Qwest also supports the Joint Application because it will allow the Company to
offer Toll Restriction under the same terms and conditions for all Idaho customers whether they
are located in the northern or southern operating territories. This will help the Company and the
Staff serve Idaho customers more efficiently and will serve to minimize customer confusion.
10.Qwest will issue individual customer notices to affected customers in both
northern and southern Idaho advising them of the proposed rate changes. Presently there are
about 35 500 customers in southern Idaho who use Toll Restriction and about 2 500 customers in
northern Idaho. Copies of the Notices to existing Toll Restriction customers in northern and
southern Idaho are attached to this Declaration as Attachments 2 and 3. These Notices will be
sent within seven days of the date ofthe filing of the Joint Application.
DECLARATION OF JOHN F. SOUBA IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 4
Boise-159844.10029164-00012
11.Qwest believes that the solution offered in the Joint Application presents a
reasonable and appropriate resolution of issues that have surrounded the provision of Toll
Restriction in southern Idaho and, to a lesser extent northern Idaho for the last several years.
Granting the relief requested by the Joint Application will allow the Company and Staff to focus
on other issues and avoid the further expenditure of time and expense on this issue.
I declare the foregoing to be true under penalty of perjury and in accordance with the
laws of the State of Idaho.
DATED this ay of July, 2003 , at Boise, Idah .
STATE OF IDAHO
) ss.
COUNTY OF AD A_
..~.."".", " ~ \..
GE-4 ##
SUBSCRIB ... ~NB.
~~~
~ TO before me this of July, 20003.
I::! ~OTA~)-' \~: ~"A:h
.- ~ .
i *
-.-
: * s
NO!~YPUB IC fo I aho
\ C ResIdmg at
-- \ '"'
f.P~y commISSIOn expIres:
..,'. .
# -1 ......
'?- "
## 1'11 OF
\~ ..
""'n.."
DECLARATION OF JOHN F. SOUBA IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 5
Boise-159844.1 0029164-00012
ATTACHMENT 1
TOLL RESTRICTION
STATE RATES
STATE USOC Res Mo. Rate Res NRC Bus Mo. Rate Bus NRC
Colorado RTY 20.
E&NS Tariff &
Price List 10.4.
24.24.
Idaho No.RTY
E&NS Tariff
10.
No NRC on main line;13.
Idaho - So.RTY 13.50 applies on add'
E&NS Catalog lines and 1 chrg p/order
10.4.4
Iowa KX9 Low NRSC applies 4.41 29.10 plus low
E&NS Tariff 13.NRSC 22.
10.4.4
Montana RTY No Charge 27.
E&NS Tariff
10.
Nebraska KX9 ;12.27.
E&NS Catalog
10.
New Mexico RTY No Charge 17.
E&NS Tariff
10.
No. Dakota KX9 NRSC applies 33.75 plus NRSC
E&NS Price currrate 12.curr rate 17.
Schedule
10.
Oregon RTY No Charge 24.
E&NS Tariff
10.
South KX9 25.25.
Dakota
E&NS Catalog
10.4.4
Utah RTY No Charge 26.40
E&NS Tariff 00 for zone C 27.50 for zone C
10.4.4
Washington RTY No Charge 24.
E&NS Tariff
10.4.4 (price list
for bus)
Wyoming RTY 27.27.
E&NS Price
Schedule
10.4.
Note: Telephone Assistance Plan qualified customers are provided Long Distance Restriction at no charge.
* Utah business- $3.00 mo. rate and $27.50 NRC in Competitive Zone
11/21/02
ATTACHMENT 2
Your Qwest Information Update:
For Idaho Business Customers
At Qwest, we make every effort to keep you well informed about any changes in your products
rates and services. Recently, Qwest has filed a proposal with the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission (IPUC) to change the rate for Toll Restriction Service for Qwest Business
Customers in Idaho. If approved, your rate would change as of October 1 , 2003.
Current Monthly Rate
Proposed Monthly Rate
$1.00
$2.
The impact of this rate change will be less than two tenths of one percent increase to Qwest'
annual regulated revenues.
Qwest's application is a proposal , which is subject to public review and an IPUC decision. A
copy of the application is available at the offices of Qwest and the IPUC or may be viewed on the
IPUC's website- www.puc.state.id.
If you have any questions, please call the number at the top ofthe first page of your monthly
phone bill, or call 1-800-603-6000. One of our representatives will be happy to help you.
7/25/03
ATTACHMENT 3
Your Qwest Information Update:
For Idaho Residential Customers
At Qwest, we make every effort to keep you well informed about any changes in your products
rates and services. Recently, Qwest has filed a proposal with the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission (IPUC) to change the rate for Toll Restriction Service for Qwest Residential
Customers in Idaho. If approved, your rate would change as of October 1 , 2003.
Current Monthly Rate
Proposed Monthly Rate
The impact of this rate change will be less than two tenths of one percent increase to Qwest's
annual regulated revenues.
Qwest's application is a proposal , which is subject to public review and an IPUC decision. A
copy of the application is available at the offices of Qwest and the IPUC or may be viewed on the
IPUC's website- www.puc.state.id.
If you have any questions, please call the number at the top ofthe first page of your monthly
phone bill, or call 1-800-244-1111. One of our representatives will be happy to help you.
7/25/03
:ECEi\lED
,,"
,'::-1
jLED
!~'--' ..
DONALD L. HOWELL, II
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
(208) 334-0312
IDAHO BAR NO. 3366
2003 JUL 30 PM 4: 51
i L' i ,
" 'j ,,
; l." I:
UTILITIES COhrilSSION
Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W. WASHINGTON
BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
QWEST CORPORATION AND THE
COMMISSION STAFF FOR APPROVAL OF
THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT REGARDING
TOLL RESTRICTION SERVICE IN QWEST'
SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN IDAHO
SERVICE AREAS
CASE. NO. QWE-03-
DECLARATION OF BEVERLY A. BARKER
IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT APPLICATION
OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE
COMMISSION STAFF
, BEVERLY A. BARKER, make this declaration based upon my personal knowledge.
am over the age of 18 and am otherwise competent to testify as to the matters set forth herein.
I declare the foregoing to be true under penalty of peIjury and in accordance with the
laws of the State ofIdaho.
1. Historically, Staff has advocated that Toll Restriction Service should be subject to the
Commission s rate setting authority found in Title 61. Without repeating all of the arguments
raised in support of its position in past proceedings, Staff notes that its primary goal was to
promote universal service by preserving the means by which customers could obtain and
maintain affordable local exchange service. Toll Restriction Service allows customers the option
of obtaining local exchange service without payment of a deposit. It also allows customers to
obtain or retain local exchange service while making payments on past due or prior bills.
Customers also may choose Toll Restriction Service as a way to limit or prevent toll calls from
being placed, providing the customer a greater degree of control over the amount, and therefore
the affordability, of their bills.
DECLARATION OF BEVERLY A. BARKER IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 1
2. As proposed by Staff and the Company, placing Toll Restriction Service for business
customers with 5 or fewer lines and residential customers under Title 61 in both northern and
southern Idaho provides customers the assurance of full regulatory oversight by the Commission
with respect to the rates, terms and conditions of service. Further, the regulatory certainty
created by the Commission s adoption of the agreement as proposed will allow both the Staff
and Company to move forward in addressing other matters of concern without the specter of this
unresolved issue. Moreover, Staff believes that the proposal is consistent with past Commission
action. In Case No. GNR-98-, Order No. 27715, the Commission designated "toll limitation
as one of the nine core services for basic local exchange service for the purpose of receiving
Telecommunications Universal Service funds.
3. The Joint Application also proposes regulatory consistency between Qwest's two
service territories in Idaho. From an administrative standpoint, the current lack of consistency is
difficult to explain to customers. The same service, offered by the same Company, is offered at
the same monthly rates, but with different non-recurring set-up charges depending on where the
customer lives. Staff is not aware of any cost basis for this variance. Staff agrees with the
Company that the charges, terms and conditions should be the same for both northern and
southern Idaho.
4. Staff views the reduction in non-recurring charges in northern Idaho from $24 to
$13.50 for business customers and the elimination of non-recurring charges for residential
customers in both northern and southern Idaho to be a substantial benefit. This action will lower
the cost that northern Idaho customers who choose Toll Restriction Service will incur when
establishing service, making telephone service more affordable.1 It will particularly benefit
payment-troubled customers, allowing them to retain service that might otherwise be subject to
disconnection. In addition to benefiting individual customers, removing these potential barriers
to obtaining or retaining local service will provide a public benefit by maximizing the number of
customers on the public switched network.
1 Currently, residential customers in northern Idaho are charged a $24 non-recurring charge when setting
up Toll Restriction in conjunction with new or existing local exchange service. In southern Idaho, the $13.50 non-
recurring charge is waived when Toll Restriction Service is set up at the time local exchange service is established
initially for single line customers. However, the $13.50 applies if the customerrequests additional lines at the time
of signing up for local exchange service or if Toll Restriction Service is requested at some time after local exchange
service is initially established.
DECLARATION OF BEVERLY A. BARKER IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - Page 2
5. A proposed increase in monthly charges for Toll Restriction Sen ice is an integral part
of the Joint Application.:Z Staff supports the rate proposal as one componen t of a comprehensive
revision of the rates, tenDS and conditions under which this important servil:e is offered. Staff
also notes that the reduction or elimination of non-recurring charges, as disl ;ussed above
mitigates to some degree the impact of an increase in monthly rates. Since customers often use
Toll Restriction Service as a transitional service to regular, unrestricted 10c.1! exchange service
the proposed rates and charges may reduce the total cost paid by customers who subscribe to the
service for short periods oftime.
6. Staffbetieves that the terms ofthe Agreement are reasonable and. in the public
interest. The Staff urges the Commission to process this Joint Application under Modified
Procedure and ultimately approve the Parties' Agreement.
DATED this
~ ~
day of July 2003 at Boise, Idaho.
f;L It) J,.. ~ER
STATE OF IDAHO
) ss.
COUNTY OF ADA
SUBSCRIBED TO AND SWORN TO before me this J1~ay of July 20)3.\\\\,\1\11""'1/111111
\\ O. Jf:~ IIIII
....... ~ ~ ,
.t "i .
. .."'(: ~
I i
~OTARy\ \ NOTARY PUBLIC forldah)
i*i A
---:*g
Residing at J30(5~.L(~.J\(J ~Co\A.....
'\ \
OB\.\ l j
'\ ... ..~~,!
My commission expires: J:Lq 10 'J~~ .... n~' II;. rr, C \'vf'" ,-ltt,
,-'
III""'UlIIII"'"
Under the proposal, monthly rates for residential customers will increase naIf 25 cents to 75 cents peraccess line. Rates for business customers will increase from $1.00 to $2.00 per access) .ne. CuslOQ)ers who qualify
for the Idaho Telephone Assistance Program will continue to receive Toll Restriction Srrvice without charge.
DECLARATION OF BEVERLY A. BARKER IN SUPPORT OF THE JOINT
APPLICA nON OF QWEST CORPORA nON AND THE COMMISSION STAFF - I age 3