Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20030417Order No 29222.pdfOffice ofthe Secretary Service Date April I?, 2003 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND IDACOMM INc. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~ 252(e). CASE NO. QWE-O3- ORDER NO. 29222 In this case, the Commission has been asked to approve an interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and IDACOMM, Inc. BACKGROUND Under the provisions ofthe federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No. 28427, companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms, prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provisions with Section 251(b) or (c). Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis original). This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms ofthe agreement do not comply with the requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C. ~ 51.3. THE CURRENT APPLICATION In this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an interconnection agreement. IDACOMM, Inc. wishes to adopt in its entirety the terms of the agreement approved by this Commission between Sprint Communications and Qwest Corporation (Case No. SPR-Ol-l). STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff has reviewed this Application and did not find any terms and conditions to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that this interconnection agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho ORDER NO. 29222 Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act. Accordingly, Staff believes that the Application merits the Commission s approval. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252 (e)(I). The Commission s review is limited, however. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest convenience and necessity. Id. Based upon our review of this Application, Staff s recommendation and on the fact no other person commented on it, the Commission finds that the above interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and IDACOMM, Inc. is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and does not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that this Application should be approved. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and IDACOMM, Inc. is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order) or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in this Case No. QWE- T -03- may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in this case. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration.See Idaho Code ~ ~ 61-626 and 62-619. ORDER NO. 29222 DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho, this /,,"" day of April 2003. PAU KJELL R, PRESIDENT MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: ~!2/f~l Commission Secretary O:QWET0308jh ORDER NO. 29222