HomeMy WebLinkAbout20030302Comments.pdfJean JewellFrom:Sent:To:Subject:Ed HowellSunday, March 02 , 2003 12:25 PMJean Jewell; Ed Howell; Gene Fadness; Tonya ClarkComment acknowledgementWWW Form Submission:Sunday, March 02 , 200312 : 2 4 : 4 4 Case: QWE-T-02-Name: Robert & Nicoline BoesterStreet - Addres s: 2009 TaggartCi ty: BoiseState: IDZIP: 83705-3450HomeTelephone: 345-4744E-Mail: boost~earthlink. netCompany: Qwestmailinglist _yes _no: yesCommentdescription: To whom it may concern:Recently, the Statesman newspaper reported thatservice in 7 Idaho ci ties.Qwest wants to deregulate its local phoneI want to go on record that I am vehemently opposed to deregulation! I have seen veryli ttle good come out of deregulation of ANY industry, be it airlines , banking,electricity, etc. I expect that the deregulation of local phone svc., will enhance Qwest Ibottom line , but that it will adversely affect my phone bills.Qwest claims that "packages , that include basic svc. and e-mail would be competi ti ve wi
prices cell phone companies charge . I am not at all interested in "packages " of any kind
thank you very much. I don t use a cell phone. I have an e-mail acount wi th my ISP
(Earthlink). I just want to keep my local phone bill as low as possible -especially in
view of the fact that my wife and I are retired , and are li ving on fixed incomes. I am
afraid that deregulating local svcs. will resul t in higher rates for that service.
Please include these comments in your public record of this case. My wife and I are
OPPOSED TO QWEST I S REQUEST.
Thank you
Robert and Nicoline Boester
Transaction ID: 321224.
Referred by: http: / /www. puc. s tate. id. us scripts /polyform. dll/ ipuc
Use r Add res s: 6 3 . 1 8 7 . 9 6 . 3 0
Us e r Ho s tname: 63. 187 . 96 . 30