Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002112final_order_no_29155.pdfdi Office of the Secretary(OÑ Service Date November 21,2002 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION )OF QWEST CORPORATION AND BASICPHONE,)CASE NO.QWE-T-02-18 NINC.FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO )AN EXISTING INTERCONNECTION )AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION )OF QWEST CORPORATION AND NEW EDGE )CASE NO.QWE-T-02-20NETWORKS,INC.FOR APPROVAL OF AN )INTERCONNECTIONAGREEMENT PURSUANT )TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION )OF QWEST CORPORATION AND MCIMETRO )CASE NO.QWE-T-02-22ACCESSTRANSMISSIONSERVICESLLCFOR)APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION )AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION )OF QWESTCORPORATION AND TIME )CASE NO.USW-T-00-14 4WARNERTELECOMOFIDAHOFOR)APPROVAL OF TWO AMENDMENTS TO AN )EXISTING WIRELINE INTERCONNECTION )AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION )OF CITIZENS TELECOMMUNCATIONS )CASE NO.CTC-T-02-2COMPANYOFIDAHOANDV&V INC.DBA THE )LOCAL CONNECTION FOR APPROVAL OF A )RESALE WIRELINE INTERCONNECTION )AGREEMENTPURSUANTTO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION )OF VERIZON AND KMC TELECOM V,INC.)CASE NO.VZN-T-02-10FORAPPROVALOFANINTERCONNECTION)AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e).) )ORDER NO.29155 In these cases the Commission is asked to approve new interconnection agreements and amendments to previously approved interconnection agreements. ORDER NO.29155 1 BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(1).The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1)discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement;or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(2)(A).As the Commission recently noted in Order No.28427, companies voluntarilyentering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms,prices and conditions that do n_ot comply with either the FCC rules or with the provisions with Section 251(b)or (c)."Order No.28427 at 11 (emphasis original).This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of [Part 51]."47 C.F.R.§51.3. THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS The Commission has been asked to approve these new agreements and amendments to existing interconnection agreements.These agreements are discussed in greater detail below. 1.Owest Corporation and BasicPhone,Inc.,Case No.QWE-T-02-18.In this Application,the parties request that the Commission approve an amendment to an existing agreement.This amendment adds terms and conditions for Internet Service Provider (ISP)bound traffic. 2.Owest Corporation and New Edge Networks,Inc.,Case No.QWE-T-02-20.In this Application,the parties request that the Commission approve an interconnection agreement.The filing also includes an Amendment regarding DC Power Reduction Procedure and Collocation. 3.Owest Corporation and MCIMetro Access Transmission Services,LLC,Case No. QWE-T-02-22.In this Appl cation,the parties request that the Commission approve an interconnection agreement.The agreement is referred to as Qwest's Statement of Generally Available Terms for interconnection or SGAT. 4.Owest Corporation and Time Warner Telecom of Idaho,Case No.USW-T-00-14.In this Application,the parties request that the Commission approve two amendments to an existing wireline interconnection agreement.The amendments add terms for Unbundled Dark Fiber and Direct Trunked Transport. ORDER NO.29155 2 5.Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho and V &V Inc.dba The Local Connection,Case No.CTC-T-02-2.In this Application,the parties request that the Commission approve a resale wireline interconnection agreement. 6.Verizon Northwest Inc.and KMC Telecom V,Inc.,Case No.VZN-T-02-10.In this Application,the parties request that the Commission approve an interconnection agreement.The parties wish to adopt the agreement between Sprint Communications Company L.P.and Verizon California,Inc.in its entirety. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff has reviewed these Applications and did not find any terms and conditions to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest.Staff believes that these new agreements and amendments to interconnection agreements are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission,the Idaho Legislature,and the federal Telecommunications Act. Accordingly,Staff believes that the Applications merit the Commission's approval. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act,interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval.47 U.S.C.§252 (e)(l).The Commission's review is limited,however.The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation _only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity.Id.Based upon our review of the Applications,the Staff's recommendation and on the fact no other person commented on these Applications,the Commission finds that the new agreements and the amendments to previously approved interconnection agreements are consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity and do not discriminate.Therefore,the Commission finds that these Applications should be approved.However,approval of these new agreements and amendments does not negate the responsibility of any of the parties to these agreements to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or complying with Idaho Code §§62-604 and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code §62-603. ORDER NO.29155 3 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the new agreements and amendments to interconnection agreements discussed above are approved.Terms of the agreements that are not already in effect shall be effective as of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amendment to the interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and BasicPhone,Inc.,Case No.QWE-T-02-18,is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interconnection agreement and amendment regarding DC Power Reduction Procedure and Collocation between Qwest Corporation and New Edge Networks,Inc.,Case No.QWE-T-02-20,is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and MCIMetro Access Transmission Services,LLC,Case No.QWE-T-02-20,is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the two amendments to an existing interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Time Warner Telecom of Idaho,Case No.USW-T- 00-14,is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interconnection agreement between Citizens Communications Company of Idaho and V &V Inc.dba The Local Connection,Case No.CTC- T-02-2,is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interconnection agreement between Verizon Northwest Inc.and KMC Telecom V,Inc.,Case No.VZN-T-02-10,is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order)or in interlocutoryOrders previouslyissued in these Case Nos.QWE-T- 02-18,QWE-T-02-20,QWE-T-02-22,USW-T-00-14,CTC-T-02-2 and VZN-T-02-10 may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21)days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order or in interlocutoryOrders previously issued in these cases.Within seven (7)days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration,any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration.See Idaho Code §§61-626 and 62-619. ORDER NO.29155 4 DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho,this 20 day of November 2002. PAUL KJELL ER,PRESIDENT MARSHA H.SMITH,COMMISSIONER ENNIS S.HAN COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Je D.Jewell Commission Secretary O:QWETO218_QWET0220_QWETO222_USWT0014_CTCO22_VZNTO210 jh ORDER NO.29155 5