Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060509final_order_no_30032.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date May 9, 2006 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND XO CASE NO. QWE-02- COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INc. FOR APPROV AL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~ 252(e). IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND CONTACT CASE NO. QWE-03- COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT ORDER NO. 30032 PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~ 252(e) In these cases, the Commission is asked to approve amendments to existing and previously approved Interconnection Agreements. With this Order the Commission approves the Agreements. BACKGROUND Under the provlSlons of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. 9 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement:(1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. 9 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No. 28427, companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of Section 251(b) or (c)." Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis in original). This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. 951.3. THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS 1. Owest Corporation and XO Communications Services, Inc. (Case No. OWE- 02-. The original Agreement was approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission on ORDER NO. 30032 February 28, 2002 as referenced in Order No. 28964. In this filing the Companies agree to amend and add terms, conditions and rates for LNP Managed Cuts as set forth in Attachment and Exhibit A, attached and incorporated into this filing. 2. Qwest Corporation and Contact Communications, Inc. (Case No. QWE-03- The original Agreement was approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission on January 28 2003. See Case No. QWE-02-23. With this filing the Companies agree to incorporate the Triennial Review Order ("TRO") and the Triennial Review Remand Order ("TRRO") into the Interconnection Agreement between the two companies. To the extent applicable, the Agreement will eliminate certain Unbundled Network Elements ("UNEs ) or add terms and conditions for certain UNEs as set forth in Attachment 1 and Exhibit A of this filing. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the Applications and does not find any terms or conditions that it considers to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that the Applications are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. Accordingly, Staff recommended Commission approval of the amendments to the Agreements. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 US.c. 9252(e)(1). The Commission s review is limited. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Id. Based upon our review of the Applications and the Staffs recommendation, the Commission finds that the Agreements are consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and do not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that the Agreements should be approved. However, approval of these Agreements does not negate the responsibility of either of the parties to these Agreements to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or to comply with Idaho Code 99 62-604 and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code 9 62-603. ORDER NO. 30032 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amended Interconnection Agreement of Qwest Corporation and XO Communications Services, Inc., Case No. QWE-02-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amended Interconnection Agreement of Qwest Corporation and Contact Communications, Inc., Case No. QWE-03-, is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code 9 61- 626. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this ?f.f'I- day of May 2006. JJ~, MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Je D. Jewell Co mission Secretary O:QWE- T -02-02 - QWE- T-03-03 _ ORDER NO. 30032