Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout28568.docBEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION AND SILVER STAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e). ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. QWE-T-00-11 ORDER NO. 28568 On September 18, 2000, Qwest Corporation and Silver Star Telephone Company, Inc. filed a Joint Application for approval of a negotiated interconnection agreement between the two Companies. The Joint Application stated that the agreement was reached through voluntary negotiations without resort to mediation or arbitration and is submitted for approval pursuant to Section 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. On October 4, 2000, the Commission issued a Notice of Application and Modified Procedure. Comments were due October 25, 2000. The Commission Staff filed comments recommending approval. Based on the record, the comments and the law, the Commission approves this interconnection agreement. BACKGROUND Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(2)(A). If the Commission does not act to approve or reject the agreement within 90 days after its submission, the agreement is deemed approved. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(4). The Commission’s decision is not reviewable by the state courts. Id. The Joint Application stated that the agreement will allow Silver Star to enter the local exchange market and provide customers with increased choices. Based on its review of the agreement and previously approved agreements, the Staff filed comments maintaining that it is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and does not discriminate against other carriers. Staff recommended this interconnection agreement be approved. No other comments were filed. COMMISSION FINDINGS Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (e)(1). The Commission’s review is limited, however. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunication carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Id. Based upon our review of the Application, the Staff’s recommendation and on the fact no other person commented on the proposed agreement, the Commission finds that the interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Silver Star Telephone Company, Inc. is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and does not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds this interconnection agreement should be approved. However, as the Commission has not determined whether the terms and conditions of Qwest’s Statement of Generally Available Terms (“SGAT”), which this agreement is based upon, complies with the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 it must be made clear that approval of this instant agreement does not represent approval of the SGAT or that its terms are consistent with the Act. O R D E R IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interconnection agreement between Qwest Corporation and Silver Star Telephone Company, Inc. is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order) or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in this Case No. QWE-T-00-11 may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in this case. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code §§ 61626 and 62-619. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this day of November 2000. DENNIS S. HANSEN, PRESIDENT MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER PAUL KJELLANDER, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Jean D. Jewell Commission Secretary O:qwet011_jh ORDER NO. 28568 -1- Office of the Secretary Service Date November 15, 2000