Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051202Decision memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER CO MMISSI 0 NER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:WAYNE HART DATE:DECEMBER 1 , 2005 RE:PROJECT MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE'S BROADBAND TAX CREDIT APPLICATION; CASE NO. PRJ-05-01. BACKGROUND On November 29 2005, the Commission received an Application from Project Mutual Telephone Cooperative (Project Mutual) asking for approval of equipment for the broadband tax credit pursuant to Order No. 28784 and Idaho Code ~ 63-30291(4). To be eligible for the tax credit, the taxpayer must obtain from the Commission an Order confirming that installed equipment qualifies for the tax credit. STAFF ANALYSIS Project Mutual's Application identifies the Company s broadband investments for the year ended December 31 2004. The application indicated Project Mutual had installed central office equipment, remote terminal equipment and fiber optic and copper cables to provide ADSL (asynchronous digital subscriber line), SDSL (synchronous digital subscriber line) and HDSL (high bit rate digital subscriber line) broadband services to Idaho customers. The application included a signed affidavit indicating the submitted investments qualified for the broadband tax credit. The Application identified a total investment under one half of a million dollars. ST AFF REVIEW In order to qualify for the credit, the broadband equipment must be capable of transmitting signals at a rate of at least two hundred thousand (200 000) bits per second to a DECISION MEMORANDUM DECEMBER 1 , 2005 subscriber and at least one hundred twenty-five thousand (125 000) bits per second from a subscriber. Idaho Code ~ 63-30291(3)(b). In addition, for a telecommunications carrier, such equipment must "be necessary to the provision of broadband service and an integral part of a broadband network"Idaho Code ~ 63-30291(3)(b)(i). Staff has reviewed the list ofproposed broadband equipment submitted by Project Mutual and believes that the equipment identified meets this statutory criteria. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the Application and further recommends that the Commission forward the approving Order along with a copy of the original Application to the Idaho Tax Commission. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to approve Project Mutual's Application for an Order confirming that the installed equipment qualifies for the broadband investment tax credit? ,.'... , ./ ., u:dmemos/project mutua12004 bband dm DECISION MEMORANDUM DECEMBER 1 , 2005